Attendants: Han Kim, Peter Cho, Matthew Park, Jungmin Lynn Lee, Hwan Jung, Jungwook Na, Soojin Lee, Minji Kim
Topic: Future Jobs.
At our KOSEN dinner, we had a diverse group of prospective professionals; dentistry students, pharmacy students, medical students, and practicing nurses. Our focus was to ponder upon how the fast-evolving technology will influence our own future jobs. We started off our discussion by stating the pros and cons of machines replacing human labour. The pro was that machines could eliminate human errors and free the professionals hands to do more sophisticated tasks at demand. On the other hand, we all firmly agreed upon the con that machines dont have the intricate level of intelligence to account for the various aspects of handling patients: the personal and humane issues. Health care professionals are easily accessible to the public not only to answer to medical inquiries, but also to provide emotional support.
For example, there was an article proposing that robots will
start to replace pharmacists in some hospitals; automated computers will electronically receive medication orders from physicians and pharmacists, select and compound medications, then dispense it to the patient through IV. As threatening as the idea of machines jeopardizing pharmacists positions sounds to future pharmacists, we had concluded that in health care, because peoples lives are whats at stake, its more important to accommodate for exceptional circumstances and to take into account each patients unique health care and personal backgrounds, than to try to minimize human labour. Every patient is unique in that they have a unique health background with varying issues regarding their health as well as personal issues. Furthermore, we suggested that the idea of being diagnosed, counselled, and interacting with robots regarding ones health might deter patients from trusting the health care system facilitated by machines and robots, and decrease their adherence to medical care, causing bigger problems that will need to be amended for at even a greater cost; more resources, human labour and money will most likely be needed to amend for the undesirable outcomes and errors. In essence, our discussion lead to the conclusion that unless machines are made intelligent enough to account for every detail and for special circumstances, the act of replacing tasks of health professionals with machines, could lay potential benefits, however should be well supervised and strictly restricted as to not exceed the limits of a robot.
2020 Hales Et Al. Signalling Inclusivity in UG Biology Courses Through Deliberate Framing of Genetics Topics Relevant To Gender Identity Disability and Race