SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - NEW YORK COUNTY

PRESENT:

JUDITH J. GiSCHE, J.S.G.

PART

Index Number : 134976/1994

1

10

CARLTON HOUSE
vs.
COURI, JAMES C.

INDEX NO.
MOTION DATE

MOTION SEa. NO.

SEQUENCE NUMBER : 002

MOTION CAL. NO.

REARGUMENT/RECONSIDERATlON

I thls motion tolfor

_.

.. . -.

..

Notice of Motion/ Order to Show Cause - Affidavits - Exhlblta

...

Answering Affldavlts - Exhibits

Replying Affldavlts

Cross-Motion:

Check one:

n 3Yes

M -

k] No

FINAL DtSPOSITION

Check if appropriate:

rl

I ? DO NOT POST

NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
REFERENCE

Supreme Court of the State of N e w York

County of N e w York: Part 10
X

___________________________r_l__r_______-------------------

CARLTON HOUSE, INC.,

DecisiodOrder
Index No.: 134976/94
Seq. No. : 001

Plaintiff,

Present:
Hon. Judith J. Gische
J.S.C.

-againstJAMES C. COURI,
Defendant.
X

________________________l___ll___l____r_-------------------

Recitation, as required by CPLR 2219 [a], of the papers

(these) motion(s) :

d in the review of this

Papers
Pltfs motion
. .
KVG affid in opp
JC reply affid .................................................................
9/9/09 JC letter....................................................................

Numbered
........... 1
2

Defendant James Couri, pro se, moves for to reargue his prior motion for an
order vacating the judgment filed December 21, 1994 which was entered against him in
this action. Kenneth Gomez, as assignee of plaintiff Carlton House, Inc., opposes this
motion. Couri has failed to establish that the court overlooked or misapprehended the
relevant facts, or misapplied any principle of law (CPLR

5 2221 [d] [2]). Rather, Couri is

merely dissatisfied with the result of his prior motion. Dissatisfaction is not a proper
basis for a motion to reargue. Accordingly, the motion is denied in its entirety.
Dated: New York, New York
September 17, 2009

So Ordered:

Page 1 of 1