Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Overview
Introduction and explanation of the methodology.
Findings from pre-election day period, starting September 2015 to
16 February 2016.
Findings from election day and post-election coverage.
Findings from social media usage by presidential candidates during
elections.
BACKGROUND
Why monitor media coverage of elections?
The goal of ACMEs project is to contribute to accurate, fair, impartial and
balanced coverage of the 2016 elections. ACMEs specific objectives are:
To monitor, document and share trends in media coverage of the 2016
general elections.
To monitor media compliance with election reporting guidelines and
regulations.
To influence journalists, editors and media owners to provide information
that is more accurate, impartial and fair.
To empower civil society and the public to demand adherence to
professional standards in media coverage of elections.
Methodology (1)
Scope of study
A purposive sample of print and electronic media.
September-March coverage of presidential and parliamentary
elections by newspaper, television and radio.
Media content types: News, current affairs, and commentary.
Social media usage by presidential candidates during elections.
Data collection method
Story/article is the unit of analysis.
Content analysis.
Key informant interviews.
Methodology (2)
Sampling
9 newspapers
5 televisions channels
33 radio stations
Twitter profiles of presidential candidates Yoweri Museveni,
Kizza Besigye and Amama Mbabazi. The choice of Twitter
was informed by the frequency of use of the platform by the
three presidential candidates during elections, compared to
Facebook, for instance.
Methodology (3)
Sampling
PRINT PUBLICATIONS (9)
TELEVISION (5)
SOCIAL MEDIA/TWITTER
@kagutamuseveni
@amamambabazi
@kizzabesigye1
Methodology (4)
Sampling
RADIO (33)
THE RESULTS
September 2015 16 February 2016
Type of election
Presidential election most covered by all three media types;
-Newspapers (65%)
-TV (70.8%)
-Radio (53.8%)
Observation: Radio covered the parliamentary election more
than newspapers and television.
13.3
15.4
21.7
13.8
22.7
23.5
70.8
65.0
53.8
Newspaper
TV
Presidential
Radio
Parliamentary
Both
11.4
16.5
17.1
10.7
11.6
10.6
5.9
19.7
18.8
19.5
23.0
36.8
33.3
50.0
11.1
40.2
Both
69.0
71.5
72.8
55.0
70.1
66.4
57.4
30.3
40.2
Parliamentary
Presidential
15.0
14.9
17.7
16.0
20.9
15.2
12.9
8.0
10.3
64.7
69.9
72.2
74.3
73.7
Bukedde
NBS
NTV Uganda
Presidential
Parliamentary
UBC
Both
WBS
89.6
96.1
98.0
10.4
3.9
2.0
Newspaper
TV
Commentary
Radio
News
Monitor
25.1
New Vision
19.5
Red Pepper
12.9
Bukedde
9.1
The Observer
3.5
The Independent
1.8
Etop
1.2
Rupiny
0.9
Orumuri
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
NBS
26.4
NTV Uganda
17.1
UBC
13.4
Bukedde
WBS
11.5
Central
20.3
Kampala
17.7
Eastern
12.3
Western
11.9
West Nile
8.5
South-Western
Northern
4.5
Monitor
21.2
New Vision
19.6
Red Pepper
12.7
Bukedde
10.2
The Observer
3.2
Etop
2.8
The Independent
Rupiny
Orumuri
2.0
1.7
NTV Uganda
24.7
NBS
18.6
Bukedde
15.4
UBC
WBS
13.7
Central
22.0
Kampala
14.7
Eastern
13.4
Western
11.2
West Nile
South-Western
Northern
7.8
7.5
Museveni
29.1
Mbabazi
21.3
Besigye
Baryamureeba
2.5
Mabirizi
2.3
Kyalya
2.1
Bwanika
2.0
Biraro
2.0
30.9
44.0
51.3
52.1
43.4
4.2
4.5
1.9
25.0
1.2
1.2
1.9
19.9
27.3
1.6
1.6
3.9
4.7
3.8
26.4
5.4
11.3
23.8
21.6
1.4
2.0
19.3
3.5
1.8
2.0
12.6
0.6
0.5
5.5
5.7
2.1
6.2
16.7
6.4
47.0
Museveni
Kyalya
22.9
5.5
28.6
0.1
0.8
4.6
Mabirizi
Bwanika
Besigye
Biraro
31.9
20.4
1.1
0.4
0.8
1.9
1.9
0.0
24.4
2.3
34.5
41.2
0.5
0.7
0.4
3.0
1.3
3.2
37.6
25.9
33.6
Baryamureeba
Mbabazi
Museveni
21.6
Besigye
19.2
Mbabazi
4.6
Baryamureeba
3.3
Bwanika
Mabirizi
2.2
Kyalya
2.0
Biraro
2.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
39.9
30.2
40.5
49.0
2.2
2.6
72.6
3.3
2.4
2.4
6.1
21.3
2.2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.2
27.6
4.8
28.5
3.8
1.4
2.5
24.0
Bukedde
Mbabazi
1.8
2.2
2.3
4.5
0.4
NBS
Besigye
17.1
12.3
NTV Uganda
Biraro
1.4
2.5
5.2
21.9
20.1
Baryamureeba
20.4
1.1
1.8
8.3
UBC
Bwanika
Mabirizi
WBS
Kyalya
Museveni
Museveni
23.5
Mbabazi
22.8
Besigye
Kyalya
3.2
Baryamureeba
2.9
Bwanika
2.6
Biraro
2.0
Mabirizi
1.9
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50
49
44.2
43.8
40
37
30
39.4
39
29.5
27.6
25.7
39.7
28
21.1
20
26.9
19.8
16.7
22.5
16.4
18.8
10
September
October
November
Museveni
December
Mbabazi
Besigye
January
February
Mabirizi
4.6
Baryamureeba
4.5
Bwanika
4.2
Biraro
3.6
Kyalya
3.4
3.0
2.9
2.6
2.3
2.5
2.1
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.7
0.3
November
December
January
February
32.8
43.8
32.8
Mbabazi
24.2
19.1
NOVEMBER
Besigye
20.2
18.9
DECEMBER
Museveni
18.4
14.8
JANUARY
13.6
FEBRUARY
Biraro
Kyalya
6.6
Bwanika
Baryamureeba
4.5
4.3
3.7
3.5
3.3
4.6
3.5
1.8
1.3
3.4
2.5
1.1
0.9
0.5
0.4
November
December
2.9
2.4
2.4
January
February
45.8
39.3
37.3
33.2
27.5
28.2
24.4
24.4
20.8
17.4
10.8
November
December
Besigye
January
Mbabazi
Museveni
February
4.7
4.6
Biraro
Bwanika
Kyalya
3.5
Baryamureeba
3.1
3.0
2.6
2.9
2.6
2.4
2.3
1.7
1.7
2.2
1.7
1.4
1.3
1.1
0.7
0.5
0.1
November
December
January
February
Museveni
23.1
Mbabazi
22.4
Besigye
Baryamureeba
3.8
Bwanika
3.6
Mabirizi
2.8
Biraro
2.7
Kyalya
2.5
5.2
4.7
3.2
5.5
4.7
18.7
1.1
1.7
1.9
1.9
1.3
29.5
1.3
0.9
2.2
1.3
1.8
31.9
2.3
0.6
2.6
2.3
4.3
1.8
1.8
3.6
5.4
3.6
17.8
26.8
22.3
3.2
5.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
22.3
19.8
21.9
9.6
5.8
23.1
2.7
4.1
4.1
10.8
4.1
14.9
15.3
29.2
23.2
21.3
21.2
27.2
Monitor
33.9
31.4
27.2
RedPepper
28.4
50.4
47.1
43.9
New Vision
5.8
1.9
1.9
The Observer
Bukedde
The
Independent
35.1
Orumuri
30.8
Rupiny
31.1
Etop
Mabirizi
Biraro
Kyalya
Baryamureeba
Bwanika
Mbabazi
Besigye
Museveni
Museveni
26.5
Mbabazi
24.5
Besigye
2.7
Baryamureeba
Biraro
2.2
Mabirizi
2.0
Kyalya
2.0
Bwanika
2.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
11.3
2.8
1.8
1.8
2.8
0.9
1.3
2.6
2.6
2.6
1.3
25.7
1.9
1.9
22.5
3.3
6.7
3.3
6.7
6.7
42.3
8.3
11.1
25.0
11.1
39.5
15.0
11.1
27.5
20.0
Mabirizi
Biraro
Kyalya
33.3
32.1
18.4
33.3
23.3
26.9
Bwanika
Mbabazi
58.8
50.0
32.1
New Vision
Baryamureeba
Monitor
31.6
RedPepper
30.0
26.9
The
Observer
Bukedde
Orumuri
33.3
Rupiny
33.3
Etop
Besigye
Museveni
Mbabazi
30.3
Museveni
23.7
Besigye
3.6
Baryamureeba
Biraro
2.7
Kyalya
2.5
Bwanika
2.4
Mabirizi
2.3
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
33.8
30.8
27.9
34.6
3.3
2.5
2.5
2.8
2.8
2.8
30.8
19.7
2.8
4.2
7.7
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.6
3.6
1.0
1.0
1.5
6.8
6.8
18.2
3.4
4.4
6.8
25.4
Monitor
New Vision
20.8
1.0
1.5
28.6
29.6
0.8
0.8
0.8
Kyalya
21.4
24.8
7.1
Museveni
Mabirizi
Bwanika
0.8
1.6
Besigye
Biraro
9.1
28.3
Etop
6.8
22.0
15.4
Bukedde
29.2
28.3
15.4
31.0
27.3
Baryamureeba
44.1
42.9
40.8
18.2
Orumuri
RedPepper
Rupiny
The
Observer
Mbabazi
40.2
33.6
32.9
26.8
39.6
36.1
31.5
28.8
35.2
30.2
27.8
21
20.8
20.8
23.1
18.7
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
7.3
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
Mbabazi
Besigye
Museveni
Politics
10.0
Economy
Security
7.9
Infrastructure
7.9
Health
7.6
6.6
Education
Agriculture
5.5
Human rights
5.1
Corruption
3.6
Energy
2.8
Natural resources
Land
Television(%) n=4,707
Politics
44.4
Politics
Economy
10.4
Security
Infrastructure
10.0
Economy
7.7
Infrastructure
7.0
Education
6.1
Health
5.5
Human rights
5.1
Agriculture
4.1
3.2
9.2
Security
8.1
Health
7.1
Education
5.8
Agriculture
Human rights
4.4
10.1
Energy
3.3
Corruption
2.5
Corruption
3.1
Energy
1.6
2.3
Natural resources
2.9
Natural resources
1.5
2.8
Other
1.5
Other
1.2
Land
Foreign affairs
0.7
Other
1.5
Land
1.4
Petition
0.0
Foreign affairs
0.7
Foreign affairs
0.9
Politics
Economy
Human rights
Security
Other
Education
Infrastructure
Agriculture
Corruption
Health
Land
Natural resources
Energy
Foreign Affairs
6.6
6.1
5.0
3.2
2.7
2.7
2.3
1.8
1.8
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.0
Politics
59.2
Politics
Human rights
Security
Economy
Other
Corruption
Infrastructure
Education
Health
Agriculture
Energy
Natural resources
Land
Foreign Affairs
7.3
7.1
4.7
3.6
3.5
3.2
2.9
2.5
2.4
1.5
0.8
0.7
0.7
Economy
Education
Infrastructure
Security
Health
Agriculture
Corruption
Human rights
Energy
Natural resources
Land
Other
Foreign affairs
28.1
11.4
9.3
8.4
8.3
7.6
6.7
5.4
4.0
3.3
2.6
2.25
1.85
0.9
Politics
30.5
Politics
11.2
Economy
10.4
Economy
Health
10.0
Infrastructure
8.6
Security
8.1
8.7
Infrastructure
Security
7.4
Health
7.9
Education
7.4
Education
7.4
Agriculture
6.9
7.0
Agriculture
4.8
Human rights
4.5
Human rights
Corruption
4.4
Natural resources
3.7
Corruption
3.5
2.3
Energy
3.1
2.3
Land
3.0
Energy
Land
Natural resources
other
Foreign affairs
3.0
0.9
0.4
Other
0.8
Foreign affairs
0.8
31.9
Politics
11.2
Economy
10.4
Security
Infrastructure
8.7
Health
8.5
6.5
Education
Humanrights
3.9
Energy
3.9
Agriculture
3.9
Corruption
3.5
Natural resources
3.0
Land
2.6
Foreign affairs
Other
1.6
0.7
Tone of coverage
Generally, the tone of coverage by all three media types
was neutral, averaging 60%.
Newspaper: Orumuri (97%), Etop (74%) and New Vision (73%)
had stories with the most neutral tone.
Television: Bukedde (66.7), NTV (66%) and UBC (60%) aired
stories with the most neutral tone.
Candidates: Mbabazi and Besigye had the most number of
stories with negative tone across all three media.
100%
15.5
9.3
11.0
61.3
60.5
29.4
28.5
90%
80%
70%
60%
60.7
50%
40%
30%
20%
23.8
10%
0%
Newspaper
TV
Positive
Neutral
Radio
Negative
15.7
15.5
9.3
27.2
14.5
12.5
0.0
22.1
36.3
73.3
60.7
62.5
61.6
74.5
57.2
97.6
67.5
54.4
17.2
23.6
22.9
25.0
15.6
Positive
10.9
Neutral
Negative
2.4
10.4
3.2
9.9
13.3
13.5
59.9
66.7
55.6
27.2
31.1
Bukedde
NBS
55.2
66.1
36.9
24.0
NTV Uganda
Positive
Neutral
UBC
Negative
31.3
WBS
5.7
5.4
62.0
63.4
4.5
5.8
5.2
67.3
67.5
63.5
28.2
26.7
31.3
62.1
62.2
19.0
17.8
32.3
31.3
20.2
Positive
Neutral
Negative
14.8
59.5
25.7
3.3
4.7
62.5
58.8
4.0
60.5
61.3
62.6
22.1
10.8
34.2
36.5
28.0
Positive
35.5
Neutral
7.5
62.3
30.2
Negative
6.9
55.2
37.9
7.5
61.9
30.7
2.2
2.1
58.0
52.8
1.1
2.7
52.6
49.3
2.8
57.6
59.7
61.4
26.0
11.0
39.8
46.3
45.1
47.9
29.2
Positive
Neutral
Negative
39.6
9.0
58.6
32.4
58.2
56.4
21.4
20.5
28.2
30.4
SEPTEMBER
13.6
13.2
17.7
15.6
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
Positive
Neutral
Negative
63.3
21.6
15.1
JANUARY
62.6
25.5
11.9
FEBRUARY
64.1
27.9
26.9
62.1
29.3
20.1
10
10.0
9.0
8.6
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
Positive
Neutral
Negative
63.5
50.7
37.2
32
24.3
18.8
12.2
9.9
November
December
Positive
January
Neutral
Negative
12.1
February
Reporting approach
The most dominant reporting approach by all three media types
was Conventional.
Among the newspapers, Etop, The Independent, The Observer
stood out for having a fair mix of the four reporting approaches.
Overall trend:
Conventional reporting highest between November and
February.
Dominance of conventional reporting pronounced in radio and
TV.
8.6
11.1
5.5
4.7
6.7
7.9
4.6
4.9
83.1
82.7
10.3
69.9
Newspaper
Conventional
TV
Interpretive
Radio
Investigative
Enterprise
9.9
10.4
11.0
8.2
16.4
16.0
12.8
3.2
3.6
3.0
9.2
32.2
16.1
77.7
13.6
4.2
16.7
11.8
4.4
16.7
1.5
16.2
16.1
24.7
90.1
66.9
56.4
24.7
66.7
65.2
67.6
50.0
34.4
Conventional
Interpretive
Investigative
Enterprise
2.1
0.7
0.7
11.0
8.5
7.5
7.5
8.6
Bukedde
NBS
Conventional
7.2
8.8
96.4
73.0
3.9
2.9
4.3
0.9
4.9
86.2
78.8
NTV Uganda
Interpretive
85.9
UBC
Investigative
WBS
Enterprise
63.0
56.6
50.7
37.0
43.4
49.3
Newspaper
TV
No
Radio
Yes
49.4
35.9
78.2
50.6
55.2
62.0
62.1
54.5
76.1
79.7
64.1
44.8
38.0
37.9
21.8
23.9
20.3
No
45.5
Yes
47.9
52.1
Bukedde
52.1
47.9
NBS
60.9
66.1
59.6
39.1
33.9
40.4
NTV Uganda
No
UBC
Yes
WBS
70.6
65.6
62.8
54.9
45.1
32.3
SEPTEMBER
34.4
52.3
47.7
No
37.2
Yes
29.4
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
59.8
50.3
49.7
40.2
39.3
32.4
November
December
January
No
Yes
February
61
59.0
52.2
52.4
47.6
November
47.8
39
41.0
December
January
No
Yes
February
Interrogation of claims
Generally, the media did not interrogate claims and promises
made by presidential candidates.
Its however noteworthy that Daily Monitor introduced the
Factchecker and Truthometer as a way of interrogating claims
and promises by presidential candidates.
38.2
61.8
Newspaper
22.3
26.3
77.7
73.7
TV
Radio
No
Yes
46.2
42.0
28.7
37.5
46.0
48.8
52.9
91.4
69.9
53.8
58.0
71.3
62.5
54.0
No
Yes
47.1
51.2
91.0
69.8
Bukedde
NBS
21.5
20.0
78.5
80.0
NTV Uganda
No
UBC
Yes
30.6
69.4
WBS
63.4
62.2
61.8
38.1
36.6
37.8
38.2
65.1
60.1
39.9
34.9
No
Yes
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
76.8
70.8
No
Yes
29.2
23.8
23.2
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
18.5
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
70.8
30
29.2
23.8
17.2
November
December
January
No
Yes
February
Sourcing
Number of sources
Overall, most election stories were single-sourced.
The problem of single sourcing more pronounced in radio.
Overall trend: An increase in the use of at least two sources.
Gender of sources
Male voices dominant in election stories.
Overall trend: Increase in number of female sources between January
and February across all three media types.
9.8
75.0
62.0
57.2
One source
16.3
21.0
19.1
Newspaper
3.1
5.6
8.4
8.6
13.8
TV
Two sources
Radio
Three sources
Multiple sources
84.2
85.4
87.1
15.8
14.6
12.9
Newspaper
TV
Female
Radio
Male
82.8
17.2
86.1
13.9
85.7
14.3
85.9
14.1
85.6
14.4
Female
67.9
32.1
Male
66.3
33.7
81.3
90.4
18.7
9.6
79.5
87.1
86.0
89.7
87.1
20.5
12.9
14.0
10.3
12.9
Bukedde
NBS
NTV Uganda
Female
UBC
Male
WBS
82.2
84.1
82.7
85.3
83.6
Male
Female
15.7
SEPTEMBER
17.8
OCTOBER
15.9
17.4
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
14.7
16.4
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
84.0
88.5
85.7
Female
Male
12.6
NOVEMBER
16.0
DECEMBER
11.5
JANUARY
14.3
FEBRUARY
86.7
87.8
85.9
11.4
13.3
12.2
14.1
November
December
January
February
Female
Male
Sourcing by occupation
Presidential candidates are dominant sources in election stories.
Dearth in the use of experts as sources, particularly by radio (2%).
Inclusion of ordinary persons voices in election stories was
encouraging.
26.0
Presidential candidate
16.1
15.4
13.1
Ordinary person
Party official
Parliamentary candidate
Candidates agent
Expert
Police Representative
Electoral Commission
Anonymous
NGO/CSO official
Executive
Religious leader
Election observer
Judicial Officer
Business person
Army
Donor
4.3
4.2
3.6
3.6
3.6
2.8
1.9
1.6
1.2
1.1
0.6
0.5
0.2
15.4
Ordinary person
10.7
Party official
9.8
Electoral Commission
6.0
Expert
4.4
Candidates agent
4.0
NGO/CSO official
3.7
Police Representative
3.7
Religious leader
1.8
Executive
1.4
Judicial Officer
1.2
Election observer
0.9
Anonymous
0.9
Army
0.6
Donor 0.2
Business person 0.2
Other (Specify) 0.1
Parliamentary candidate
34.9
Presidential candidate
18.1
Party official
13.9
Electoral Commission
9.7
Ordinary person
6.4
Police Representative
5.2
Candidates agent
4.8
NGO/CSO official
4.6
Executive
2.4
Religious leader
2.3
Expert
2.0
Anonymous
1.2
Judicial Officer
1.2
Election observer
0.8
Army
0.6
Donor 0.2
Other 0.1
Business person 0.1
Parliamentary candidate
26.5
POST-ELECTION COVERAGE
Period: 18 February - 31 March 2016
Key events: Election day, the petition and activities of the opposition
New Vision
18.5
Red Pepper
17.0
Monitor
14.1
The Observer
11.0
Bukedde
7.1
The Independent
Orumuri
Etop
Rupiny
3.2
2.9
2.6
NTV Uganda
31.8
NBS
15.9
WBS
Bukedde
UBC
4.8
4.2
Museveni
30.8
Besigye
27.5
Mbabazi
Mabirizi
0.9
Bwanika
0.8
Biraro
0.7
Baryamureeba
0.6
Kyalya
0.5
Besigye
34.7
Mbabazi
21.3
Museveni
2.5
Biraro
Baryamureeba
1.7
Bwanika
1.6
Kyalya
0.5
18.6
23.8
18.0
28.5
2.2
0.9
1.2
0.4
2.0
2.9
9.3
54.2
44.0
Bukedde
Kyalya
Bwanika
37.2
Besigye
2.4
25.2
29.5
Museveni
33.0
NBS
Biraro
5.4
1.3
59.3
50.3
Mbabazi
29.9
NTV Uganda
Baryamureeba
UBC
WBS
Besigye
29.9
Museveni
23.8
Mbabazi
3.7
Mabirizi
Bwanika
2.5
Baryamureeba
2.3
Biraro
2.3
Kyalya
2.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
15.5
1.4
1.1
24.1
23.1
23.8
22.1
21.7
29.8
39.5
36.7
29.8
Newspaper
Results
17.1
Administration
TV
Transparency&Accountability
Radio
Voter Education
Voter Information
3.7
1.9
3.0
15.7
26.9
33.0
32.7
0.6
13.2
20.6
11.8
17.6
3.8
6.7
20.0
27.3
23.1
23.1
24.2
21.6
29.4
24.3
29.4
34.6
Voter Education
19.0
73.3
72.7
Transparency&Accountability
58.2
43.2
29.4
37.4
Voter Information
36.8
41.2
38.5
Administration
Results
33.3
21.0
1.0
33.3
20.4
6.7
20.0
21.4
27.0
18.9
23.8
25.2
42.9
13.3
40.0
26.7
Bukedde
Results
32.0
4.8
54.1
19.0
NBS
Administration
NTV Uganda
Transparency&Accountability
UBC
WBS
Voter Education
Voter Information
39.7
16.4
11.7
11.6
4.0
3.9
2.3
2.1
1.9
1.7
1.3
1.2
1.2
0.6
0.4
Politics
25.06
Petition
17.52
Security
15.09
Human rights
Corruption
Other
Foreign affairs
Economy
Education
Natural resources
Health
Land
Energy
Agriculture
Infrastructure
3.16
2.43
1.22
0.73
0.49
0.24
0.24
0
0
0
0
42.8
19.1
18.1
12.2
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.1
0.8
0.7
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.0
Candidate tone
Tone of coverage for presidential candidates was
dominantly neutral across all three media types.
21.4
73.8
50.0
13.4
17.6
23.8
47.1
26.7
26.7
40.0
33.3
33.3
40.0
64.4
28.6
35.3
11.9
Positive
Neutral
Negative
30.8
38.5
30.8
15.3
66.5
18.2
33.3
69.2
12.7
25.3
100.0
66.7
16.7
62.7
100.0
Neutral
72.7
14.5
12.0
Positive
100.0
Negative
70.4
23.7
3.9
10.6
66.7
58.3
33.3
41.7
61.9
69.6
68.4
69.8
38.1
30.4
31.6
26.3
63.5
25.9
Positive
Neutral
Negative
Sourcing
Single-sourced stories dominant in post-election coverage
with Bukedde newspaper and UBC TV having the highest
number of single-sourced stories.
Judicial officers were the most quoted sources in postelection reporting.
26.1
21.5
58.1
14.6
20.5
6.3
10.8
68.8
38.7
24.8
Newspaper
One source
TV
Two sources
Radio
Three sources
Multiple sources
20.0
21.0
43.4
27.2
15.6
7.9
4.8
10.0
17.5
30.0
14.4
27.2
11.8
28.2
24.7
60.0
50.0
31.6
30.3
One source
Two sources
29.6
14.8
47.4
69.8
50.0
16.7
33.3
14.5
24.3
5.3
15.8
Three sources
Multiple sources
55.6
30.8
0.0
30.8
52.6
54.3
7.7
79.2
30.8
5.3
7.4
8.6
38.5
Bukedde
2.6
29.6
NBS
One source
10.5
61.5
31.6
10.4
7.8
NTV Uganda
Two sources
Three sources
UBC
WBS
Multiple sources
15.6
12.5
11.0
9.9
9.2
8.4
7.3
6.7
4.6
3.0
2.7
2.3
2.1
2.0
1.4
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.1
18.46
16.8
12.49
9.37
8.63
7.44
6.98
4.96
4.96
4.13
1.74
1.56
0.83
0.83
0.55
0.28
14.5
13.0
12.2
12.1
11.7
11.0
5.9
4.6
3.6
3.2
2.8
2.4
1.0
0.7
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
Introduction
Three candidates Museveni, Mbabazi, Besigye - were chosen on the
basis of the frequency of their use of Twitter and the level of influence of
their tweets.
Searchable conversations.
Tools
Socialbakers, Yoast and Twitter internal analytics.
Twitter handles
@kagutamuseveni
@amamambabazi
@kizzabesigye1
Definitions - 1
Total followers: The total number of profile followers during a
selected time range.
Relative change in followers: The percentage change in followers
during a selected time range.
Absolute change in followers: The total change in followers during a
selected time range.
Interactions are both outgoing and incoming
Total tweets: The total number of tweets made by a profile during
the selected time range.
Average tweets per day: The sum of all engagement rates of original
tweets made over the month divided by the total tweets made during
the same time period.
Definitions -2
100,000
50,000
December
January
Yoweri Museveni
February
Amama Mbabazi
Kizza Besigye
March
March
Yoweri Museveni
4.37%
3.84%
Amama Mbabazi
3.37%
5.19%
Kizza Besigye
32.22%
16.27%
December
Yoweri Museveni
January
February
Amama Mbabazi
March
KizzaBesigye
Following
There is a significant difference in the approach of candidates to
receiving information through their Twitter timelines, indicated by the
number of profiles they follow. Yet the larger and more diverse your
following, the wider ones topics and the more likely one is to engage
in discussion, share information and respond to queries.
January
February
March
14
16
17
17
6,241
6,326
6,342
6,579
319
323
325
331
January
Yoweri Museveni
February
Amama Mbabazi
March
Kizza Besigye
January
February
March
4.6
5.4
4.9
1.4
0.4
8.6
4.1
0.2
0.9
0.9
1.4
2.1
S
E
L
E
C
T
T
W
E
E
T
S
S
E
L
E
C
T
T
W
E
E
T
S
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
December
Yoweri Museveni
January
February
Amama Mbabazi
March
Kizza Besigye
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
-
December
Yoweri Museveni
January
February
Amama Mbabazi
March
Kizza Besigye
December
Yoweri Museveni
January
February
Amama Mbabazi
March
Kizza Besigye
@amamambabazi
@kizzabesigye1
1. @TeamSevo
992 mentions
1. @Tjozra
899 mentions
1. @FDCOfficial1
731 mentions
2. @lenonmullar
908 mentions
(Just one month- Jan)
2. @talemwa2008
806 mentions
2. @ByamugishaMoses
322 mentions
3. @amonrukundo
635 mentions
3. @jude_mugabi
749 mentions
3. @jude_mugabi
302 mentions
4. @kiryowakk
626 mentions
4. @Amama2016
643 mentions
4. @BMKGift
214 mentions
5. @hkashillingi
376 mentions
5. @JMNkangi
595 mentions
5. @#vote4change
212 mentions
December
Yoweri Museveni
January
February
Amama Mbabazi
March
Kizza Besigye
Summary of conclusions
All three presidential candidates used Twitter in the same manner that
they use traditional media platforms: as a space to provide information,
but not a space to listen, respond and debate.
There were numerous opportunities lost by the presidential candites in
engaging with large following; such as answering questions and
distinguishing themselves from their rivals by mentioning them by
name (handle).
While supporters of the three candidates were quite combative on
Twitter, they kept the conversation cordial, only hinting on their rivalry
in covert ways.