comment that conveys a meaning indirectly by the use of comparison, analogy, or the like. - This case brings about the debate of an Individual Vs the group ethic., super ordinate , subordinate goals and leadership The case facts - Author McCoy was on a six month sabbatical. - He along with his friend Stephen were on "once in a lifetime" trip to Muklinath a place in Nepal for which they had to cross a 18000ft pass over a crest. - They were camping at 14500 ft. where they were joined by four New- Zealanders, a Swiss couple and a Japanese hiking club. - The New-Zealanders left first followed by Steffen and Mccoy with their porters and Sherpa followed by the Swiss, and the Japanese. - They were resting at 15500ft with Stefen suffering altitude sickness also some porters were suffering from the height. - The New- Zealanders found a half naked sadhu in the mountains. - The New-Zealander asked Mccoy to help the sadhu as they had porters and went back to join his team. The case facts - Mccoy found that the Sadhu was suffering from Hypothermia but he was alive. - Stefen and the Swiss couple immediately clothed Sadhu. - Mc Coy & the Swiss couple left soon after leaving Stephen alone with the Sadhu and some of the porters. - Stefen asked the Japanese to help shift the Sadhu to a village down below as the Japanese team had a horse with them. The Japanese refused but gave Sadhu some food and left. - Stefen asked the Sherpas to carry the Sadhu to the hut but they also refused as they thought it was not possible to shift the Sadhu to a hut below and crossed the crest before the snow melted. - They didn't know whether the Sadhu lived or dead. Breakdown between individual ethic and corporate ethic No one was willing to take responsibility for the sadhu. - Each was willing to do his bit as long as it was not too inconvenient. - No person willing to assume ultimate responsibility. - Where is the limit to our responsibility ? - No one on the mountain was willing to commit himself beyond a certain self imposed limits. Individual Vs Group Ethic
- Stress is the real test of personal and
corporate values. - Not every ethical dilemma has the right solution. It is essential that managers agree on a process for dealing with the dilemmas. - The group reacted instinctively as individuals. - The cross cultural nature of the group added a layer further of complexity Ethical Choice - Immediate response - Decision to act. - Action & implementation together. - Not developing consensus. - Group reaction as individual under stress. - Cross cultural group. - No leader identified. - Only Stephen, but not support. - Should have mutually accepted & shared value. - Members need to have preconceived notions. - Correct behavior or business ethics. Parallel to business situations - Failure to act was a decision in itself. - Managers come up with answers to problems. - Organizations that do not have mutually accepted , shared values tend to become unhinged during stress.
Preconceived Notion “Business Think of it as a positive
of correct behavior Ethic” force, not a constraint Effective managers can not run away from risk. - Need to confront & deal with the risk. - Notion of shared value & agreed on process to be at the heart of ethical issues. - Need leaders to understand, interpret to manage corporate value system. - Need effective managers, who are action oriented, conflict resolving, tolerance of ambiguity, stress, change, strong sense of purpose of themselves & the organization. - One can fulfill the need for individual success along with group support, corporate support. Without corporate support, individual is lost. The lesson
- Individual requires deserves support of the
group. - With support forthcoming, individual can contribute to the success of the group. - Managements challenge is to be sensitive to individual needs,to shape them direct focus them for the benefit of the group as a whole. The Sadhu lives………
- For each of us the Sadhu lives
- Whether to stop to comfort him or to rush up towards the high pass. - Which is more ethical? - Perhaps, the best decision would have been to change the value of the group and with all its resources,act the otherway.