You are on page 1of 3

From: (b) (6)

To: (b) (6)


Subject: Fw: EPCWID#1 Meeting: AAR
Date: Saturday, February 02, 2008 8:11:06 AM
Importance: High

Hey,
I sent this to EPT today to add onto the AAR they submitted. I couldn't forward their first version
because it lacked too much to do (b) (6) any good in helping (b) understand the issue better. I will
get you something this weekend. (6)
(b)
(6)
----- Original Message -----
From: (b) (6)
To: (b) (6)
Cc: (b) (6)
Sent: Sat Feb 02 08:08:52 2008
Subject: Fw: EPCWID#1 Meeting: AAR

(b)
Sounds like quite the meeting...
(6)
I know a lot of work was put into this as with every product your guys produce.

I spoke with Chief Self and he agreed that some points need to be added to the AAR.

1) EPT and EPCWID both prefer the fence placement north of the levee but that options requires the
canal improvement project be undertaken.

2) The floating fence design has not yet been cleared by the engineering teams for use on this levee or
for the 8 mile length of the segment regardless of north or southside of the levee road placement.

3) Explanation of why if floating fence is used, why EPT doesn't want it on the southside of the levee
road as EPCWID would prefer

4) The AAR mentions the option of placing the fence on the northside of the canal road as an option
but never really mentions it again. I believe the AAR needs EPT's preference ranking of this option as
well as why the sector feels the canal road option is 2nd in preference as you did with the support for
the floating fence design

I know these additions are in issue papers but if we wrap this up in one document anyone that reads
this in preparation for next weeks meetings will be all the more knowledgable of EPT's reasoning and
thorough work done on this project.

If you get a chance, I would like to talk with you about this today because I have a need for a final
version of this AAR this weekend. Thanks in advance to all of you.
(b)
(6)
----- Original Message -----
From: (b) (6)
To: (b) (6) SELF, JEFFREY D; (b) (6)
Cc: (b) (6)

Sent: Fri Feb 01 18:04:23 2008


Subject: EPCWID#1 Meeting: AAR

Gentlemen,

Please see attached after action report reference today’s meeting with the El Paso County Water
Improvement District #1.

The report has been included in plain text in case you are not able to open the attachment.

Thanks,

(b) (6)

SBInet Office

(
b
)
(
5
)
,
(
b
)
(
6
)
(
b
)
(
5
)
,
(
b
)
(
6
)

You might also like