Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DYNAMICS 8.1
Module 2
Modal Analysis
Module 2
Modal Analysis Training Manual
DYNAMICS 8.1
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
Modal Analysis
A. Definition & Purpose Training Manual
DYNAMICS 8.1
– Natural frequencies
– Mode shapes
– Mode participation factors (how much a given mode participates
in a given direction)
DYNAMICS 8.1
–
Recommendation: Because a structure’s vibration characteristics
determine how it responds to any type of dynamic load, always
perform a modal analysis first before trying any other dynamic
analysis.
DYNAMICS 8.1
•
[ M]{ u } + [ C]{ u } + [ K ]{ u} = { F( t )}
•
•
[ M ]{ u} + [ K ]{ u} = { 0}
u = U sin(ωt )
([ K ] − ω [ M] ){ u} = {0}
2
DYNAMICS 8.1
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
Modal Analysis
… Terminology & Concepts (cont.) Training Manual
DYNAMICS 8.1
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
Modal Analysis - Terminology & Concepts
Mode Extraction Methods Training Manual
DYNAMICS 8.1
– Block Lanczos (default)
– Subspace
– PowerDynamics
– Reduced
– Unsymmetric
– Damped (full)
– QR Damped
DYNAMICS 8.1
– Efficient extraction of large number of modes (40+) in most
models
– Typically used in complex models with mixture of
solids/shells/beams etc.
– Efficient extraction of modes in a frequency range
– Handles rigid-body modes well
DYNAMICS 8.1
– Requires relatively less memory but large diskspace
– May have convergence problems when rigid body modes are
present.
– Not recommended when constraint equations are present.
– Generally superseded by Block Lanczos
DYNAMICS 8.1
– Requires large amount of memory.
– May not converge with poorly shaped elements or an ill-
conditioned matrix.
– May miss modes (No Sturm sequence check)
– Recommended only as a last resort for large models.
–
DYNAMICS 8.1
– Memory and disk requirements are low.
– In general fastest eigen solver
– Employs matrix reduction, a technique to reduce the size of [K]
and [M] by selecting a subset of DOF called master DOF.
– Reduction of [K] is exact but [M] loses some accuracy
– Accuracy of [M] depends on number and location of master DOF.
– Generally not recommended due to
• Expertise required in picking master DOF
• Efficient alternatives such as Block Lanczos
• reduced cost of hardware
DYNAMICS 8.1
– Calculates complex eigenvalues and eigenvectors:
• Real part is the natural frequency.
• Imaginary part indicates stability - negative means stable,
positive means unstable.
DYNAMICS 8.1
– Typical application is rotor dynamics, where gyroscopic damping
effects are important.
– Two ANSYS elements, BEAM4 and PIPE16, allow gyroscopic
effects to be specified in the form of real constant SPIN
(rotational speed, radians/time).
– Calculates complex eigenvalues and eigenvectors:
• Imaginary part is the natural frequency.
• Real part indicates stability - negative means stable,
positive means unstable.
DYNAMICS 8.1
– Faster and more stable than the existing Damped Solver
– Works with poorly conditioned models
– All forms of damping allowed including damper elements
– Combines the best features of the real eigensolution method
(Block Lanczos) and the Complex Hessenberg method (QR
Algorithm)
– Outputs complex eigenvalues ( frequency and stability) and
damping ratio of each mode
– Supports the use of a material dependent damping ratio
[MP,DMPR] in a subsequent mode superposition harmonic
analysis
DYNAMICS 8.1
MODOPT,QRDAMP,NMODE
DYNAMICS 8.1
Comparison Demonstrating the Superior Solution Performance
of the QR Damped Mode Extraction Method
140000
120000
100000
CPU (sec)
80000 ELAPSE (sec)
60000
40000
20000
0
QRDAMP DAMP July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
Modal Analysis - Terminology & Concepts
Summary for symmetric, undamped solvers Training Manual
DYNAMICS 8.1
Extraction Linear Solver
Remarks
method Used
Block Lanczos Sparse Matrix Recommended for most applications; Most stable;
Stable but slow; Requires large disk space; Has
Subspace Frontal Solver difficulty with constraint equations / rigid body
modes
Same as subspace but with PCG solver; Can
handle very large models; Lumped mass only; May
Powerdynamics PCG solver
miss modes; Modes cannot be used in
subsequent spectrum and PSD analyses
In general fastest; Accuracy depends on Master
DOF selection; Limitations similar to Subspace;
Reduced Frontal Solver
Not recommended due to expertise required in
selecting Master DOF.
DYNAMICS 8.1
•
DYNAMICS 8.1
•
DYNAMICS 8.1
ü Build the model
•
*Discussed next
DYNAMICS 8.1
Mode extraction options
defaults to 1e8
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
Modal Analysis Procedure
… Choose Analysis Type & Options Training Manual
DYNAMICS 8.1
– Normalization to mass matrix is the default, and is required for a
spectrum analysis or if a subsequent mode superposition
analysis is planned.
– Choose normalization to unity when you want to easily compare
relative values of displacements throughout the structure.
• Modes normalized to unity cannot be used in subsequent
mode superposition analyses (transient, harmonic,
spectrum or random vibration)
DYNAMICS 8.1
– Have element stresses calculated.
– Do a subsequent spectrum or mode superposition analysis.
DYNAMICS 8.1
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
Modal Analysis Procedure
… Choose Analysis Type & Options Training Manual
DYNAMICS 8.1
– Mainly used for slender beams and thin shells, or for wave
propagation problems.
– Automatically chosen for PowerDynamics method.
DYNAMICS 8.1
ü Build the model
DYNAMICS 8.1
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
Modal Analysis Procedure
... Apply BC’s and Solve Training Manual
DYNAMICS 8.1
Full Model
Symmetry BC Anti-Symmetry BC
DYNAMICS 8.1
For the plate-with-hole model, the lowest non-zero mode for the full
and the quarter-symmetry case is shown below. The 53-Hz mode
was missed by the anti-symmetry case because ROTX is non-zero
along the symmetry boundaries.
DYNAMICS 8.1
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
Modal Analysis Procedure
Review Results Training Manual
DYNAMICS 8.1
ü Build the model
DYNAMICS 8.1
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
Modal Analysis Procedure
… Review Results Training Manual
DYNAMICS 8.1
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
Modal Analysis Procedure
… Review Results Training Manual
DYNAMICS 8.1
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
Modal Analysis Procedure
… Review Results Training Manual
DYNAMICS 8.1
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
Modal Analysis Procedure
… Review Results Training Manual
DYNAMICS 8.1
Modal stresses:
DYNAMICS 8.1
Mode shapes
normalized to
unity
DYNAMICS 8.1
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
July 22, 2004Inventory #
D. Workshop - Modal Analysis Training Manual
DYNAMICS 8.1
– A step-by-step description of how to do the analysis.
– You may choose to run this problem yourself, or your instructor
may show it as a demonstration.
– Follow the instructions in your Dynamics Workshop supplement (
WS2: Modal Analysis - Plate with a Hole, Page WS-17 ).