Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=epw.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Economic and Political Weekly.
http://www.jstor.org
Feminine Identity and National Ethos in Indian
Calendar Art
Patricia Uberoi
Women have been and still are excluded from the production of and representation in many social and cultural
activities, but even when they are included they do not receive their due recognition. In many genres of representa-
tion however, women are not only visible: they are prominent'objects of attention. The issue is then transformed
into one of the correctness or incorrectness of the representation, or of the socially constraining nature of the
stereotypical imagery, or of the relationship between women's subjectivity and objectivity.
This paper looks at the representation of women in a little discussed genre of Indian popular art-what has
been called 'calendar art' or 'bazaar art'. These representations are seen as instancing two processes, the com-
moditisation of women and the tropising of the feminine, within an overallculturalcontext that was both homogenis-
ing and hegemonising.
I that it is possible to hold to both positions becomeobjectsor thingsto be appropriated,
simultaneously in a form such as the follow- possessed and exchanigedin the social rela-
Problematics of 'Invisibility' and ing: NWomenhave been and still are excluded tions of co-operation and competition
'Visibility' from the production of and representation among men. Of particularinterestfrom this
in many social anid cultural activities, but point of view has been the interpretationof
IN India, as elsewhere, a Ilmost important even wheni they are included they do not the representationof womeil in one of the
thrust of feminist social science hlas been receive their duc recognition. This double- privilegedgenresof modernEuropeanart-
that of-makingwoomen'visible',their voices barrelled proposition lies at the base of a the traditionof 'nude'painting,coveringthe
audible,in historyand society [Sharma1982; great deal of academic feminism and social period roughly from the 15th to the end of
Mazumdar1985;Banerjee1988;Chakravarti activism. It is a plea for inclusion, for equali- the 19thcentury.There seems to have been
and Roy 1988, etc]. This is a project on ty and for justice, and the.chief issue is to an historicalconvergenceinvolvingthe sub-
which all are agreed, but it is one which is decide whether -remedy should be sought in ject matter of painting (the nude female
not, in fact, quite so straightforwardas it policies of affirmative action ('reservations) form being a major type), the establishment
may at first appear. or in conscientisation: provision trom above of the new medium of oil painting (giving
Some take the position, for instance,that or action from below. texture,depth and a sense of tactility to the
women have alwaysmade a very significant objectsdepicted),the masteryof techniques
In many genres of representation,
contribution to their societies, but that a of perspective (creating a sense of veri-
however, women are not only visible: they
patriarchal conspiracy has prevented similitudeor realism)and the institution of
are prominent objects of attention-even of
women'scontributionfrom receivingits due a new socio-economic order, that is,
admiration and of worship-and one can
recognition. The reason is that society's capitalism. Indeed, the social order of
hardly complain of their invisibility and
legitimating myths, the creation of written capitalismis especially implicatedas one in
neglect. The issue is then transformed into
historical records and the production of which the objectificationand commodifica-
one of the correctness or incorrectniessof the
authoritative self-knowledge have all been tion of women has reached unprecedented
representation, or of the socially constraini-
enterprisescontrolledby males.The implica- heights.
ing nature of the stereotypical imagery,
tion is that a self-conscious effort must be
made to locate women's voices within especially for those who do not naturally fit Originally,works of art displayed in the'
the bill (see the discussion of deviant per- homes of the aristocraticand the wealthy
patriarchaldiscourse, to 'retrieve'women's'
sonality types in Mead 1935), or of the rela- functioned as signs of individual rank and
history, to bear witness to their contem-
tionship between women's subjectivity and wealth, the nude female body an object of
poraryproductivityand to ensurethat threir
objectivity. This latter is rather a vexed ques- the privilegedgaze of the male patron and
labour is both recognised and properly
tion, for it is patently not the case that all his friends [Berger 1972:ch 3]. Techniques
rewarded[Kleinberg 1988; Lerner 1986].
women at all times speak in women's voices. of mechanical reproduction (lithography,
The other proposition is signalled in the
They, too, are captives of society's dominant oleography and photography) have been
key-term'marginalisation'.Quite to the con-
ideologies, self-alienated as gendered sub- crucialin increasinglygeneralisingthis mode
traryit is maintainedthat women havenever
jects, and very often the most immediate and of appropriation to a class of mass con-
lbeenallowed to make their full and proper conspicuous oppressors of their own sex [see
contributionto society. They are not visible sumers [Benjamin 1973], a process which
Nany 1980: 34-35]. The authentic voices and reachedits apogee in the inventionof cheap
because, expresslyor by default, they have
genres of women, and the modes and colour photographya few-decadesago. Col-
been excludedfrom certaindomains of acti-
moments of their resistance to patriarchal our photography, as John Berger has
vity, notably the politica,, and relatively
domination have to be located and cele- written:
speaking confined to doniestic space. This
brated in a self-consciously subaltern pro- Can reproducethe colour and textureand
hierarchicaldivision of labour and of social
ject [e g, Chakravarti 1983, 1988; Das 1989a, tangibilityof objectsas only oil paint had
space constrains feminine activity and ex- 1989b; Karlekar 1989, etc], while converse-
pressionand projectswomen as dependents beenableto do before.Colourphotography
ly commending those males who, despite what oil paintwas
is to the spectator-buyer
of mren In this case the implication is that
themselves as it were, have succeeded in ex- to the spectator-owner.Both media use
women should fight for the right to enter
into those domains from which they were pressing a genuinely feminine sensibility [e similar,highlytactilemeansto playuponthe
previouslyexcludedand to ensurethat their g, Millett 1969; ch 81. spectator'ssenseof acquiringthe realthing
More than this, however, the 'objectifica- whichtheimageshows.Inbothcaseshis feel-
formal legal rights are actually availed of. ing that he can almosttouch what is in the
The different groundings of these two tion' of women in those genres where they
are the prominent objects of attention is read image remindshim how he might or does
arguments (i e, that women are unrecog- possessthe realthing[Berger1972:140-141].
nised, or that women are excluded)are not as something problematic in itself, in par-
ticular as an indication that women have In otherwordsit is arguedthat in modern
usually interrogated.Perhaps the reason is