You are on page 1of 34

DETERMINATION

OF TRACES
IN NATURAL
GAS

Prepared By
Wisam Al-Shalchi
Petroleum Expert

Baghdad - 2005
Contents
Summary 2
Chapter one
Analysis of Natural Gas
1-1 The Chemical Composition of Natural Gas 4
1-2 Traces in Natural gas 6
1-3 Analysis of Natural Gas by Gas Chromatography 10
1-4 Analysis of Natural Gas by Spectroscopic Methods 19

Chapter Tow
Determination of Traces in Natural Gas
2-1 Determination of Sulfur Compounds in Natural Gas 21
2-2 Determination of Nitrogen Compounds in Natural Gas 24
2-3 Determination of Halogen Compounds in Natural Gas 25
2-4 Determination of Mercury in Natural Gas 26
2-5 Determination of other Metals in Natural Gas 28

Conclusions and Recommendations 30

References 32
CV of the Researcher

1
Summary
Compared with other fossil fuels, natural gas enjoys a well-deserved
reputation as a clean source of energy. It is of paramount importance to
the gas industry to diligently safeguard this “clean energy” reputation that
natural gas rightfully enjoys. To ensure the environmental safety of
natural gas utilization, every effort should be made to determine if any
potentially harmful constituents exist in natural gas. This will enable the
industry to take appropriate cleanup measures if these constituents are
present. This proactive approach by the gas industry will help maintain
environmental standards, while averting regulatory “surprises” leading to
the unnecessary measurement of non-existing harmful components in
natural gas. In the past few decades after the massive usage of natural gas
as a fuel, and as a raw material for different industries, many destructive
effects were observed concerning the public health of the persons who
work in these fields, or on the equipments used in processing and
industrializing the gas. In the year 2000 for example, it was reported in
Chicago in USA that more than 280,000 homes in northern Illinois will
be tested for mercury contamination, and that clean-up efforts have
commenced as testing continues. This was after a homeowner in the
Chicago suburb of Mount Prospect reported a silvery substance in the
basement. Illinois Attorney General and county prosecutors have filed a
five-count lawsuit against the gas distributing company in Illinois-based
Nicor, Inc. and two contractors in an attempt to quickly clean up mercury
contamination found in homes and buildings. It is known that Mercury,
inhaled over long periods of time, can cause nerve damage, respiratory
failure and kidney damage. The most important question now is how
many other communities are being contaminated with Mercury and other
hazardous materials coming from their gas pipes? Other specific
examples include corrosion of aluminum in cryogenic heat exchangers,
gates and stems of wellhead valves. Such mercury-induced corrosion of
aluminum heat exchangers resulted in catastrophic failure of heat
exchangers at the Skikda LNG plant in Algeria (1975). Thus it is very
important to determine the Trace constituents in natural gas qualitatively
and quantitatively, no matter how small their quantities are in it, for the
sake of the public health and the safety of equipments used in processing
it. In the following sections the author reports the information collected
about analysis methods for speciation and measurement of trace
constituents of natural gas. Also the report contains a list of some modern
instruments used in analysis of natural gas, and their specifications.
The Author*
Wisam Al-Shalchi – Petroleum Expert, Email: wisamalshalchi@yahoo.com

2
Chapter one
Analysis of Natural Gas
Natural gas is a colorless, highly flammable gaseous hydrocarbon
mixture consisting primarily of methane and ethane. It is an important
energy source and widely used as a starting material for many chemical
processes. It contains also different levels of other hydrocarbons and
fixed gases such as Nitrogen, Helium, and Carbon dioxide. Below that
0.01 mole percent concentration level, there may exist a whole population
of gas components and some other metals collectively classified as trace
constituents. The major portion of these trace constituents are naturally
occurring species such as paraffinic and aromatic hydrocarbons, organic
sulfur compounds, hydrogen, and others. However, some compounds are
those inadvertently introduced by gas processing or contamination.
Hydrocarbons heavier than C7 are usually present in natural gas at
small concentrations (ppm levels). Hydrogen Sulfide and other Sulfur
compounds may also be present, either naturally or as added odorants.
Additional components may include polar compounds such as low levels
of water, small amounts of methanol and/or glycol which may have been
added for processing purposes. Natural gases from different sources
usually have the same composition but in different concentration levels.
Regardless of their origin, a number of advanced tests can be used to
identify these trace components.
Major and minor components of natural gas are routinely analyzed by
Gas Chromatography (GC) using a Thermal Conductivity Detector
(TCD). The best results obtained by these methods can report no better
than 0.01 mole percent of each measured component. Even the extended
method of analysis by Flame Ionization Detector (FID) can only improve
on the detection limit of hydrocarbons. The gas industry needs better
information on all trace constituents of natural gas, whether native or
inadvertently added during gas processing that may adversely influence
the operation of equipment or the safety of the consumer. The presence of
Arsenic and Mercury in some gas deposits have now been documented in
international literature as causing not only human toxicity but also
damaging the field equipment. Yet, no standard methods of sampling and
analysis exist to provide this much needed information.
A cryogenic sampler operating at near – 99 oF, and at pipeline
pressures up to 1800 psig has been developed to preconcentrate and

3
recover all trace constituents with boiling points above Butanes. Specific
analytical methods have been developed for speciating and measurement
of many trace components by Gas Chromatography-Atomic Emission
Detector (GC-AED), and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy (GC-
MS) and for determining various target compounds by other techniques.
Moisture, Oxygen and Sulfur contents are measured on site using
dedicated field instruments. Arsenic, Mercury and Radon are sampled by
specific solid sorbents for subsequent laboratory analysis.

1-1 The Chemical Composition of Natural Gas:


The constituents of natural gas vary with geographic location and no
single composition can be considered to be typical. An exact
determination of the composition of natural gas can be made using Mass
Spectrometry (MS) and Gas Chromatography (GC). By using these
highly sensitive instruments any natural gas sample can be fractionated to
its constituents, and the concentration of each specie can be determined as
high as a few parts per million. The analysis of a gas sample taken from
Panhandle natural gas field in Texas in the United States is given in
Table (1).

Boiling Point Concentration


Compound Formula o
C %
Methane CH4 -161.5 76.2
Ethane C2H6 -88.5 6.4
Propane C3H8 -42.2 3.8
n-Butane C4H10 -0.5 1.3
Isobutane C4H10 -120.1 0.8
n-Pentane C5H12 36.1 0.3
Isopentane C5H12 27.9 0.3
Cyclopentane C5H10 49 0.1
Hexane C6H14 69 0.3
Nitrogen N2 -195.8 9.8
Oxygen O2 -183 Trace
Argon Ar -185.8 Trace
Hydrogen H2 -272.7 0
Hydrogen sulphide H2S -61 0
Carbon dioxide CO2 -78.5 0.2
Helium He -218.9 0.45

Table (1): Analysis of a sample of natural gas taken from Panhandle


Field (Texas).

4
On the other hand, the analysis of a gas sample taken from south
Jumbour field in the northern region of Iraq is shown in Table (2).

Compound Formula Volume %


Methane CH4 86.78
Ethane C2H6 7.01
Propane C3H8 3.12
n-Butane C4H10 1.49
n-Pentane C5H12 0.60
Hexane C6H14 0.73
Heptane and >C7 - Trace
Carbon dioxide CO2 0.24
Nitrogen N2 Trace
Hydrogen sulphide H2S 10 ppm
Mercaptane - 4.2 ppm
Carbonyl sulphide COS2 28.2 ppm
Moisture - 1200 ppm

Table (2): Chromatographic analysis of a sample of natural gas taken


from South Jumbour in the northern region in Iraq.
In the seventies of the previous century, trace analysis was done for
many natural gas samples taken from different regions of the Iraqi
petroleum and gas fields. The results showed that Helium is present in
different trace concentrations as seen in Table (3) below.
All the hydrocarbon gases in natural gas mixtures are inflammable,
and all are members of the paraffin series. By far the most abundant
component is Methane CH4, which usually found in percentage between
80-95%. Methane dose not condense to a liquid under the temperature
and pressure conditions usually prevailing, and is therefore always
present in the gaseous phase, either in the form of free gas or dissolved in
liquid oil. The second component in this series which is present in natural
gas in considerable percentage is Ethane C2H6 (1-10%). Higher
hydrocarbons of higher boiling points occur only in small proportions in
natural gas, and in general it is easy to find that the higher the boiling
points of the hydrocarbons, the smaller will be their proportion in natural
gas. Inert non-hydrocarbon components such as Carbon dioxide,
Nitrogen, Hydrogen Sulphide, Helium, Argon, Water, Mercury, solid
particles...etc, may be also present in the natural gas. Some of these are
found in substantial percentages (Nitrogen, Hydrogen Sulphide, and
Carbon dioxide) and some (Argon, Helium) are present usually only in

5
small amounts. Of these gases, Helium may be of commercial value in
their own right where their concentrations are relatively high.

Region Concentration in ppm


Kirkuk / Well 59 32
Kirkuk / Well 78 35
Jambour 61
Bai Hassan 66
Ain Zala 157
Khanakeen Nil
Qayara Nil
Abu Ghrab 73
Bauzirgan 85
North Rumaila / medium 18
North Rumaila / light 11
South Rumaila 98
Zubair / degasing station 17
Hamar / degasing station 21
Nahran Omar 17

Table (3): Results of Helium analysis of different samples of Natural


Gas taken from different regions in Iraq.

1-2-Traces in Natural Gas:


Natural Gas contains many kinds of traces. Sulfur compound traces
are probably the most species present in natural gas. Nitrogen
compounds, Halogen compounds, and heavy Metals like Mercury and
Arsenic are also present as traces in many natural gases which are
produced from different fields around the world.
a- Sulfur compounds:
The presence of sulfur compounds in natural gas is undesirable since
many of these compounds have unpleasant odors and are unstable,
corrosive and poisonous to the industrial catalysts. The analysis of the
gaseous sulfur compounds in natural gas usually faces several problems
like:
(1) Difficulties of the chromato-graphic separation of these gases from
the natural gas hydrocarbons.
(2) Hydrocarbon interference with the sulfur response.
(3) Possible adsorption of compounds on reactive surfaces in the
analytical system.

6
Gaseous sulfur compounds like Hydrogen sulfide, Carbonyl sulfide,
and Methyl Mercaptan are separated from natural gas by using a long
methyl silicone column following the guidelines of ASTM method D
5504. Retention time precision is measured. Detection of the target
analytes is with the pulsed flame photometric detector (PFPD) which is
shown to give equimolar response for sulfur components.

Figure (1): Histogram of sulfur compounds separation by Gas


Chromatography method.

b- Nitrogen compounds:
The presence of amines, ammonia, nitrogen oxides (NOx) and other
nitrogen containing compounds can be artifacts of gas-processing
operations or could be naturally occurring. They may cause operational
difficulties and equipment malfunction due to their action as catalyst
poisons. Nitrogen-containing species can affect the coatings, printing,
glass manufacturing, industrial food processing, and the chemical
manufacturing industries. The combustion of nitrogen containing
compounds can produce noxious and corrosive acids in gas flames.

c- Halogen compounds:
Chlorine-containing compounds and other halogens can be naturally
occurring, or result from environmental contamination. Halogens can
affect the coatings, printing, glass manufacturing, industrial food
processing, and the chemical manufacturing industries. The combustion
of halogens can produce noxious and corrosive acids in gas flames. Gas
chromatography coupled with an element selective detector is the
technique most commonly used to determine chlorine- and fluorine-
containing compounds. The element selective detectors respond to
halogens contained in the separated components. These include the
atomic emission detector, the electrolytic conductivity detector, and the
electron capture detector. Total fluorine and total chlorine methods can be

7
performed by oxidative combustion microcoulometry using a fluorine or
chlorine selective electrode system, or by pyrolysis, followed by
detection using an ion selective electrode. The electrolytic conductivity
detector (ELCD) reduces halogen compounds eluting from a GC to HX in
a high temp catalytic converter. The HX is dissolved into a deionized
solvent whose increase in conductivity is directly related to the halogen
concentration. Depending on sample size, 0.05 ppm or lower detection
limits can be achieved. Most interferences originate from the major
components of the gas being analyzed and are seen as an upset in the
baseline prior to the earliest eluting compound. This technique is very
sensitive and simple to use.

d- Metals:
There are tow kinds of metals which are present in Natural Gas.
(1) Mercury (Hg):
Mercury may exists in petroleum or natural gas in it's free form as a
vapor or drops of liquids or as an organometalic compounds. Mercury
only exists in some petroleum or gas fields worldwide, but when it
exists in natural gas, condensate and crude oil it can adversely affect
hydrocarbon production and processing in a variety of ways,
specifically by:
• Forming amalgams with a variety of metals, including aluminum,
copper, brass, zinc, chromium, iron, and nickel. When these
amalgams are formed with the metal components of the processing
equipments, corrosion of these equipments usually results. The
corrosion occurs because either the amalgam is weaker than the
mercury-free metal, or, as is the case of aluminum amalgam, the
amalgam reacts with moisture to form a metal oxide plus free
mercury causing the corrosion process to continue. Specific
examples include corrosion of aluminum in cryogenic heat
exchangers, gates and stems of wellhead valves. Such mercury-
induced corrosion of aluminum heat exchangers resulted in
catastrophic failure of exchangers at the Skikda LNG plant in
Algeria (1975).
• Mercury poisoning of catalysts reduces the catalyst life.
• Mercury amalgam formation on steel pipe walls can result in
classification of production and processing equipment as hazardous
waste.
Mercury concentrations in natural gas are typically reported as
microgram per "normal" cubic meter µg/ Nm3 (1 µg = 10-6 gm), where
normal (N) indicates standard temperature and pressure. Mercury

8
concentrations in natural gas vary from 0 to > 300 µg/Nm3 with some
of the highest concentrations occurring in the Indonesian Arun and
Dutch Groningen fields (see table below). In condensate, Hg
concentrations vary from 10 to 3,000 ppb (part per billion). Published
concentrations for various natural gases and oils include:

Field Location Hydrocarbon Hg Concentration


Groningen Netherlands Gas 0.001-180 µg/Nm3
Unknown Netherlands Gas 0-300 µg/Nm3
Arun Sumatra Gas 180-300 µg/Nm3
Unknown Middle East Gas <50 µg/Nm3
Unknown South Africa Gas 100 µg/Nm3
Unknown Far East Gas 50-300 µg/Nm3
San Joaquin
Cymric Oil 1.9 - 21 ppm
Valy, CA

Table (4): Mercury in some different fields worldwide.


The Mercury species which are present in different petroleum
sectors are listed in the following table:

Species Boiling Point oC Sector


Hg 457 Gas + Petroleum
HgCl2 302 Petroleum
(CH3)2Hg 96 Gas +Petroleum
(C2H5)2Hg 170 Petroleum
(C3H7)2Hg 190 Petroleum
(C4H9)2Hg 206 Petroleum

Table (5): Kinds of Mercury species which are present in different


petroleum sectors.
Mercury occurs in natural gas in the metallic form. In contrast,
condensate associated with natural gas contains Hg in a variety of
forms, including elemental, ionic and organometallic. As a result, Hg is
not limited to a particular boiling fraction of a condensate. For example,
it is reported that the following mercury distribution between the boiling
ranges of a Southeast Asian condensate:

9
Boiling rang oC Description Wt. % of total Hg
<36 ---------- 8.9
36-100 naphtha 27.6
100-170 naphtha 33.8
170-260 kerosene 16.0
260-330 diesel oil 7.4

Table (6): Distribution of mercury between different petroleum


sectors.

(2) Arsenic (As):


Arsenic is present in natural gas only in rare cases. It is not present in
free form as with Mercury, but it is usually present in the organometalic
form. The following table shows the relative concentration of some
Arsenic organic compounds in a sample of natural gas taken from one
of the gas fields which is contaminated with this metal.

Average Percent Molecular Boiling


Compound
(% total arsenic) Weight Point oC
Trimethylarsine (TMA) 60 - 90 120 52
Dimethylethylarsine
10 - 30 134 86
(DMEA)
Methyldiethylarsine
5 - 15 148 110
(MDEA)
Triethylarsine (TEA) 1-5 162 139

Table (7): Relative Concentrations and Basic Properties of


Arsenic Contaminants in Natural Gas

1-3 Analysis of Natural Gas by Gas Chromatography:


There are several ways for determining the composition of Natural
Gas. One of the most important instrumental methods is the analysis by
Gas Chromatography technique. The process of gas chromatography is
carried out in a specially designed instrument. A very small amount of
liquid mixture is injected into the instrument and is volatilized in a hot
injection chamber. Then, it is swept by a stream of inert carrier gas

10
through a heated column which contains the stationary, high-boiling
liquid. As the mixture travels through this column, its components go
back and forth at different rates between the gas phase and dissolution in
the high-boiling liquid, and thus separate into pure components. Just
before each compound exits the instrument, it passes through a detector.
When the detector “sees” a compound, it sends an electronic message to
the recorder, which responds by printing a peak on a piece of paper. The
(GC) consists of an injection block, a column, and a detector. An inert gas
flows through the system. The injection chamber is a heated cavity which
serves to volatilize the compounds.

Figure (2): Diagram of a simple gas chromatography


instrument.
The sample is injected by a syringe into this chamber through a port
which is covered by a rubber septum. Once inside, the sample becomes
vaporized stream and is carried out of the chamber and onto the column
by the carrier gas. The column is an integral part of the GC system. On
the outside, it is a long stainless steel or a glass tube, 0.1 to 10 mm in
diameter and 1 to several meters long. To fit into the temperature-
controlled oven in the gas chromatograph, the column usually must be
bent or coiled. Inside the column is the important component: the
stationary phase which is either small particles of a solid adsorbent, or a
high-boiling liquid which is usually impregnated on a high surface area
solid support like diatomaceous earth, crushed firebrick, or alumina. The
liquid can be applied in various concentrations: the more liquid, the more
sites it has to interact with the compounds. Two categories of columns are
used for gas chromatography, these are:
™ Packed columns: These are columns which contain particles of the
stationary phase packed into a metal or glass tube. The metal tubes are
usually constructed of stainless steel. A packed column generally has a
diameter of between 1 and 10 mm and a length between 1 and 4 m.

11
™ Open tubular columns: These are columns which have the liquid
stationary phase coated on the column's inner walls, or on a thin layer
of a solid support coated on the inner wall of the column. The inner
diameter of an open tubular column is often between 0.2 and o.5 mm,
while its lengths vary from 20 to 80 m, and it is usually made of glass.
There are several types of open tubular columns:
• Wall-Coated Open Tubular (WCOT): This column has a thin
layer of a stationary liquid phase coated directly on the inner wall
of pretreated glass capillary column.
• Support-Coated Open Tubular (SCOT): It has a thin layer of a
solid support coated on the inner wall of the column. The
stationary liquid phase is coated on the solid support.
• Porous-Layer Open Tubular (PLOT): This column has the inner
wall coated with a porous layer of the stationary phase.
The carrier gas is an inert gas, like Nitrogen or Helium. The flow rate
of the gas influences how fast a compound will travel through the
column; the faster the flow rate, the lower the retention time. Generally,
the flow rate is held constant throughout a run. Two devices are used to
record the (GC) traces/areas under peaks:
™ Integrating recorders
™ Computer program
Each type of device records the messages sent to them by the detector
as peaks, calculates the retention time, and calculates the area under each
peak; all of this information is included in the printout. For similar
compounds, the area under a GC peak is roughly proportional to the
amount of compound injected. If a two-component mixture gives relative
areas of 75:25, you may conclude that the mixture contains
approximately 75% of one component and 25% of the other.
The retention time, (RT) is the time it takes for a compound to travel
from the injection port to the detector; it is reported in minutes on our
GCs. The retention time is measured by the recorder as the time between
the moment you press start and the time the detector sees a peak. If you
do not press start at the same time you inject your sample, the RT values
will not be consistent from run to run.

a- Factors affecting the GC separations:


Efficient separation of compounds in GC depends on the compounds
traveling through the column at different rates. The rate at which a
compound travels through a particular GC system also depends on the
following factors:

12
(1) Volatility of compounds: Low boiling (volatile) components will
travel faster through the column than will high boiling
components.
(2) Polarity of compounds: Polar compounds will move more
slowly, especially if the column is polar.
(3) Column temperature: Raising the column temperature speeds up
all the compounds in a mixture.
(4) Column packing polarity: Usually, all compounds will move
slower on polar columns, but polar compounds will show a larger
effect.
(5) Flow rate of the gas through the column: Speeding up the
carrier gas flow increases the speed with which all compounds
move through the column.
(6) Length of the column: The longer the column, the longer it will
take all compounds to elute. Longer columns are employed to
obtain better separation.
Generally the first factor which governs the separation of compounds
on the GCs is the boiling point of the different components. Differences
in polarity of the compounds are only important if the compounds of the
mixture have widely different polarities. Column temperature, polarity of
the material in the column, flow rate, and length of a column are usually
constant in (GC) runs in the Organic Chemistry Laboratories. In Gas
Chromatography analysis (GC), the variety of components in natural gas
requires the separation of both polar/non-polar compounds. Multi-
dimensional (GC) is often required since no single column can separate
this wide variety of natural gas constituents, nor can a single detector
detect all compounds satisfactorily. If more than on column is used in
analyzing natural gas, then these columns are connected by one or more
multiple port valves and the complete separation is obtained by time
switching eluents to each column and detector. Due to the complications
of the multi-dimensional gas chromatography method, many companies
have carried out research to establish new methods, and to develop new
instruments and parts for these chemical experiments. The best modern
columns which are used in determining the composition of natural gas by
Gas Chromatography method are of the Plot type (Porous-Layer Open
Tubular). These kinds of columns are also categorized into several types,
according to the thin porous layer material coated inside the column, the
kind of analysis they are used for and the kind of chromatographic
analysis they are used in. The most important kinds are:
(1) The HP-PLOT Al2O3 column: This column is often used for
hydrocarbon separations and the determination of BTUs.

13
(2) HP-PLOT Molecular Sieve Column: It is used for the separation
of fixed gases such as Oxygen, Nitrogen, Hydrogen, Helium, Neon,
and even Argon from Methane.
(3) Q-type Porous Polymer PLOT Column: This column is used to
separate polar compounds like water, carbon dioxide, and odorants
which are mostly composed from sulfur compound?
(4) Silicagel Column: This column is suitable for the separation of air,
hydrogen, methane, and ethane.
The best column of these kinds used in analyzing the natural gas is the
HP-Plot Q type column (developed by Agilent). The HP-PLOT Q type is
a bonded polystyrene-divinylbenzene (DVB) based column that has been
specially developed for the separation of targeted polar and non polar
compounds including:
• Hydrocarbon (natural gas, refinery gas, ethylene, propylene, all
C1-C3 isomers).
• CO2, methane, air/CO, and water.
• Polar solvents (methanol, acetone, methylene chloride, alcohols,
ketones, aldehydes, esters).
• Sulfur compounds (H2S, mercaptans, COS).
It was found practically that this column is one of the best columns
used in analyzing natural gas. Like the columns, the detectors used in Gas
Chromatography instruments are also of several kinds, these are:
(1) Thermal Conductivity Detector (TCD): A (TCD) detector
consists of an electrically-heated wire or thermistor. The temperature of
the sensing element depends on the thermal conductivity of the gas
flowing around it. Changes in thermal conductivity, such as when
organic molecules displace some of the carrier gas, cause a temperature
rise in the element which is sensed as a change in resistance. The (TCD)
is not as sensitive as other detectors but it is non-specific and non-
destructive. It is cheap and easy to use, thus it is widely used especially
in routine tests.
(2) Flame Ionization Detector (FID): An (FID) consists of a
hydrogen/air flame and a collector plate. The effluent from the GC
column passes through the flame, which breaks down organic
molecules and produces ions. The ions are collected on a biased
electrode and produce an electrical signal. The (FID) is extremely
sensitive with a large dynamic range. Its only disadvantage is that it
destroys the sample.
(3) Electron Captured Detector (ECD): The (ECD) uses a radioactive
Beta emitter (electrons) to ionize some of the carrier gas and produce a

14
current between a biased pair of electrodes. When organic molecules
that contain electronegative functional groups, such as halogens,
phosphorous, and nitro groups pass by the detector, they capture some
of the electrons and reduce the current measured between the electrodes.
The (ECD) is as sensitive as the (FID) but has a limited dynamic range
and finds its greatest application in analysis of halogenated compounds.
(4) Flame Photometric Detector (FPD): The (FPD) combusts the GC
eluent in an H2 rich flame to produce S2 excited species. Energy emitted
upon decay is directly related to the (approx.) square root of the S
concentration. It has a detection limit and range of 20 - 20,000
picograms, with generally three orders of magnitude dynamic range.
However, hydrocarbon quenching from closely eluting HCs can
interfere with the production of S2 species.

b- Analyzing Natural Gas by Gas Chromatography


Instrument:
This experiment was based on the standard D 1945 of ASTM (American
Society for Testing and Materials). Gas chromatography analysis of a
sample of Natural gas was done using an Agilent 6890 gas
chromatograph (GC) instrument with electronic pneumatics control
(EPC), a single Plot type column and a Thermal Conductivity Detector
(TCD). For conventional gas analysis, a six-port valve with a 0.25 cc
sampling loop was used to introduce natural gas sample onto the HP-
PLOT Q column in split mode (split ratio 18:1). The GC parameters are
listed in Table (8) below.

Table (8): Gas Chromatography experimental conditions.

15
A sample of natural gas of the compounds and concentrations listed in
Table (9) below was used in this experiment. This sample was modified
by adding Methanol, Water, and Hydrogen sulfide. During analysis, the
possible leaking of some air in the sampling loop may have also caused
some changes in concentrations.

Table (9): Chemical composition of a Natural Gas sample.


Analyses were run using an HP-PLOT Q porous polymer column. The
column was conditioned at 250°C overnight per manufacturer
recommendation to reduce column bleed. HP-PLOT Q type columns are
coated with porous polymer particles made of Divinylbenzene and
Ethylvinylbenzene and can separate hydrocarbons up to C14 as well as
some polar compounds. The gas sample was introduced to the
chromatographic column by opening the outlet valve of the sample
cylinder and purging the sample through the inlet system and sample loop
as shown in Figure (1). The sample loop pressure was near atmospheric,
and the temperature of the sample was maintained near that of the source
where the sample was taken from.

16
Figure (3): The sampling system used in natural gas analysis.
The upper isothermal and programming temperature limits are 270°C
and 290°C, respectively, and the rate of raising the temperature of the
oven was 30oC/min. The analysis time for this experiment was 9 minutes.
The separation of the constituents in the natural gas sample was done
using a porous polymer HP-PLOT Q column as shown in Figure (4).

Figure (4): Separation of Natural Gas by Gas Chromatography.


Hydrogen sulfide, Water, and Methanol were well-separated from
Ethane, Propane and Isobutane. Although baseline spiking is commonly
associated with this analysis for some commercially available columns,
no baseline spiking was observed with the HP-PLOT Q column,

17
indicating that the stationary phase of this PLOT column provides
excellent immobilization that can withstand: fast oven temperature
ramping (30°C/min), a pressure pulse generated from valve actuation, and
carrier gas pressure ramping at constant flow mode. Resultant column
bleed was very low. This separation capability of the HP-PLOT Q
column also can sufficiently resolve Nitrogen and carbon dioxide from
Methane, even if the Methane peak is tailing due to sample overload. The
starting temperature of 60°C also results in a 30% reduction in GC cycle
time. One of the concerns associated with using PLOT columns for
natural gas analysis is reproducibility. It is well known that when using
alumina PLOT and molesieve PLOT columns, the retention times for
hydrocarbons shift due to deactivation of column absorbants from sample
components such as Water and CO2 during repeated runs.
It was not possible to carry out the analysis of natural gas containing
mercaptans (added to natural gas as odorants) by this kind of experiment,
because most sulfur compounds and even water deactivate Al2O3 and
mole sieve PLOT column coatings.
Although back flushing heavier compounds in natural gas analysis is
very common for all PLOT columns, this technique may not be needed
for HP-PLOT Q columns. Figure (5) shows this possibility, where
heavier alkanes up to C14 were eluted on HP-PLOT Q column at 300°C,
at such a high temperature, the column maintained relatively low bleed.

Figure (5): Elution of C8 to C14 on HP-PLOT Q column


It can be easily concluded that analysis of Natural gas by GC/TCD
operation on a single porous polymer HP-PLOT Q column gives
satisfactory separation using a very simple GC/TCD configuration and
operation. The reproducibility of the analysis is very good. Back flush
may not be needed for hydrocarbons up to C14, which can be eluted at
300°C temperatures.

18
1-4 Analysis of Natural Gas by Spectroscopic
Methods:
Natural gas can be analyzed by Mass Spectroscopic method according
to the standard D 1137 of ASTM. After the recent development of the gas
chromatography method and the combination of gas chromatography and
the mass spectroscopy in one instrument, that method is no longer used in
most of the petroleum laboratories. Other spectroscopic methods like
Atomic Absorption and Atomic Fluorescence spectroscopy are used to
determine some of the traces in natural gas like Mercury and Arsenic.

a- Mass Spectroscopy:
The molecular species making a natural gas are ionized and dissociated
by electron bombardment, the resulting positive ions of different masses
are accelerated in an electric field and are separated magnetically, and
abundance of each mass present is recorded. The mixture spectrogram
thus obtained is solved against the mass spectra of each of the pure
molecular species constituting the mixture.
Mass spectrometry has been described as the smallest scale in the
world, not because of its size but because of the size of the things it
weighs. Mass spectrometry, also called mass spectroscopy, is an
instrumental approach that allows for the mass measurement of
molecules. Mass spectrometers use the difference in mass-to-charge ratio
(m/e) of ionized atoms or molecules to separate them from each other.
Mass spectrometry is therefore useful for quantitation of atoms or
molecules and also for determining chemical and structural information
about molecules. Molecules have distinctive fragmentation patterns that
provide structural information to identify structural components. The
general operations of a mass spectrometer are:
(1) Create gas-phase ions.
(2) Separate the ions in space or time based on their mass-to-charge
ratio.
(3) Measure the quantity of ions of each mass-to-charge ratio.

19
Figure (6): Main parts of a Mass Spectrometer.

b- Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS):


Atomic-absorption (AA) spectroscopy uses the absorption of light to
measure the concentration of gas-phase atoms. Since samples are usually
liquids or solids, the analyte atoms or ions must be vaporized in a flame
or graphite furnace. The atoms absorb ultraviolet or visible light and
make transitions to higher electronic energy levels. The analyte
concentration is determined from the amount of absorption. Applying the
Beer-Lambert law directly in AA spectroscopy is difficult due to
variations in the atomization efficiency from the sample matrix, and
nonuniformity of concentration and path length of analyte atoms (in
graphite furnace AA). Concentration measurements are usually
determined from a working curve after calibrating the instrument with
standards of known concentration.

Figure (7): Diagram of an Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (AAS).

c- Atomic Florescence Spectroscopy (AFS):


Atomic fluorescence is the optical emission from gas-phase atoms that
have been excited to higher energy levels by absorption of
electromagnetic radiation. The main advantage of fluorescence detection
compared to absorption measurements is the greater sensitivity
achievable because the fluorescence signal has a very low background.
The resonant excitation provides selective excitation of the analyte to

20
avoid interferences. AFS is useful to study the electronic structure of
atoms and to make quantitative measurements.
Analysis of solutions or solids requires that the analyte atoms be
desolvated, vaporized, and atomized at a relatively low temperature in a
heat pipe, flame, or graphite furnace. A hollow-cathode lamp or laser
provides the resonant excitation to promote the atoms to higher energy
levels. The atomic fluorescence is dispersed and detected by
monochromators and photomultiplier tubes, similar to atomic-emission
spectroscopy instrumentation.

21
Chapter Two
Determination of Traces in
Natural Gas
Routine analysis of Natural Gas for the calculation of heating value,
specific gravity and compressibility is an established measurement
practice by the gas industry worldwide. However, these routine analyses
provide information only on major and minor components. They do not
detect trace constituents at low concentration levels. As detection
technology improves, new analytical methods are constantly being
developed to measure these trace level compounds. The primary
motivation for this is the gas industry’s ever-increasing environmental
awareness along with federal and state requirements to regulate and
monitor air quality emissions. Furthermore, these compounds could have
deleterious effects on the gas distribution system, harm gas-processing
operations or result in operational or end-user difficulties. Natural gas is a
colorless, highly flammable gaseous hydrocarbon mixture consisting
primarily of methane and ethane with lesser amounts of inert gases and
heavier hydrocarbons. Automated gas chromatographs provide gas
composition with excellent precision and accuracy for components such
as N2, CO2, and paraffins from C1 through C5, especially if calibration
gases of known uncertainty are used. These tests have detection limits of
about 0.01 mole percent.
Below 0.01 mole percent concentration level there may exists a whole
population of gas components collectively classified as trace constituents.
The major portion of these trace constituents are naturally occurring
species such as paraffinic and aromatic hydrocarbons, organic sulfur
compounds, hydrogen and others. However, some compounds are those
inadvertently introduced by gas processing or contamination. Regardless
of their origin, a number of advanced tests can be used to identify these
trace components. Tests for certain specific compound classes are
described below.

2-1 Determination of Sulfur Compounds in Natural


Gas:
Sulfur compounds are either naturally occurring or odorants that are
artificially added to natural gas to impart a smell for easy detection. Gas
chromatographic analysis offers speciation information useful for gas

22
quality monitoring. The analysis of a natural gas sample containing
mercaptans (added to natural gas as odorants) was done by Gas
Chromatography method using HP-Plot Q type. The experiment used the
same conditions listed in Table (7), and a temperature starting from 60oC.
Figure (6) shows the chromatogram of a GC separation of four kinds of
mercaptans, carbonyl sulfide and hydrogen sulfide.

Figure (6): Sulfur Compound Separation by GC.

The compounds are well separated and resolved and their elution
positions still fall in between those for Ethane and i-butane in Figure (3)
above. GC systems for sulfur speciation can be designed with several
different detectors. As a rule, element selective detectors will provide the
best data because the detector responds to sulfur contained in the
separated components. The detectors used most generally include:
™ Flame Photometric Detector (FPD):
This detector is used as described before.
™ Pulsed Flame Photometric Detector (PFPD):
The Pulsed Flame Photometric Detector (PFPD) uses the same
excitation technology except the flame is pulsed. Because the
background emissions decay more quickly than the excited S2
species, the detector response is optimized by delaying the signal
monitoring to eliminate background emissions. This can improve the
detection limit at least 10-fold.
™ Sulfur Chemiluminescence Detector (SCD):
The Sulfur Chemiluminescence Detector (SCD) uses a different
combustion chemistry to yield an excited SO radical plus other
reaction products. Reaction of SO with ozone creates electronically

23
excited SO2. The chemiluminescence signal emitted upon decay is
directly (equimolar) related to S concentration. This technique has a
detection limit and range of about 10-1,000,000 picogram with
generally five orders of magnitude dynamic range. The detector
requires precise control of the hydrogen and air flow rates, and the
vacuum system.
™ UV-Fluorescence Detector (UFD):
Another new detector uses UV fluorescence. The GC eluent gas is
combusted with O2 producing SO2. Excitation with UV energy
ultimately generates a fluorescence decay signal that is directly
related to S content. It can detect from the ppm to the % level range,
offering four orders of magnitude dynamic range. However,
combustion byproducts can interfere by contributing to the
fluorescence decay signal.

™ Atomic Emission Detector (AED):


The Atomic Emission Detector (AED) is an analytical tool that is not
found in many laboratories. Instead of combusting the GC eluent, the
gas is introduced into a microwave-induced helium plasma-
producing electronically excited atom. The sample is aspirated in a
nebulizer and is carried by a slower stream of helium directed
centrally toward a point where the sample is heated by conduction
and radiation and may reach 7000ok, where it is completely atomized
and excited. A photodiode array measures the emitted energy upon
decay back to the ground state. Generally, a 1 ppm detection limit
can be achieved with four orders of magnitude dynamic range. The
technique can suffer from spectral interferences from hydrocarbons
and other molecular emission bands, causing baseline upsets. While
it is true that it is expensive to maintain and operate, it is a powerful
tool for elemental speciation, not only for sulfur but also for many
other element specific compounds. It offers a true compound
independent calibration that gives a linear response regardless of the
source molecule.
There are some other techniques for total sulfur determination (no
speciation), or H2S (only) determination which include:
a- Oxidative Combustion Microcoulometry:
The sulfur species are either oxidized or hydrogenated prior to detection.
Again, detection limits are highly dependent on sample matrix.
Incomplete combustion can cause low results. Oxidative combustion
microcoulometry uses an oxygen/argon stream to react with a gas sample
at high temperature-producing SO2. The gas stream is sparged into a

24
reaction cell and titrated by coulometrically generated triiodide ions.
Sulfur is proportional to the electricity required to generate the triiodide.
The dynamic range is from the ppm level to the % level, depending on
the volume of gas sampled.

b- Lead acetate paper tape detection:


The principle of using lead acetate paper tape method is based on that
H2S reacts with lead acetate to form a brown PbS discoloration. The
chemicals are impregnated in a paper tape. Total sulfur can be
determined by a prior hydrogenation. The rate of color change or the
color intensity is measured by photoelectric devices. It is generally used
between 0.1-16 ppm concentration ranges. The chemical reaction is
sensitive to temperature and gas flow changes. This technique is easy and
simple but disposal of used tape can be a problem.

2-2 Determination of Nitrogen Compounds in Natural


Gas:
The presence of amines, ammonia, NOx, and other nitrogen containing
compounds can be artifacts of gas-processing operations, or could be
naturally occurring. They may cause operational difficulties and
equipment malfunction due to their action as catalyst poisons. Nitrogen-
containing species can affect the coatings, printing, glass manufacturing,
industrial food processing, and the chemical manufacturing industries.
The combustion of nitrogen-containing compounds can produce noxious
and corrosive acids in gas flames. Again, gas chromatography coupled
with an element selective detector, is the technique most commonly used
to determine nitrogen-containing compounds. These include:

™ Atomic Emission Detector (AED):


This detector is used as described before.

™ Nitrogen-Phosphorus Detector (NPD):


The Nitrogen Phosphorus Detector (NPD) is similar in design to the
FID, except that the hydrogen flow rate is reduced to about 3
ml/min and an electrically heated thermionic bead (NPD bead) is
positioned near the jet orifice. Nitrogen or phosphorus containing
molecules exiting the column collide with the hot bead and undergo
a catalytic surface chemistry reaction. The ions created in this
reaction are attracted to a collector electrode, amplified, and output
to the data system.

25
™ Nitrogen Chemiluminescence Detector (NCD):
The NCD works similarly to the sulfur chemiluminescence
detector. Combustion of the GC eluent gas with air under H2 rich
conditions yields NO. The NO molecule reacts with ozone to create
electronically excited NO2. A chemiluminescence signal emitted
upon decay back to the ground state is directly related to N
concentration. A typical detection limit is 1 ppm. While diatomic
nitrogen (N2) is not generally detected, there is a slight response to
N2 so air leaks can be a problem. Like the (SCD), the detector
requires precise control of the hydrogen and air flow rates, and the
vacuum system

2-3 Determination of Halogen Compounds in Natural


Gas:
Chlorine-containing compounds and other halogens can be naturally
occurring, or result from environmental contamination. Halogens can
affect the coatings, printing, glass manufacturing, industrial food
processing, and the chemical manufacturing industries. The combustion
of halogens can produce noxious and corrosive acids in gas flames. Gas
chromatography coupled with an element selective detector is the
technique most commonly used to determine chlorine- and fluorine-
containing compounds. The element selective detectors respond to
halogens contained in the separated components. These include:

™ Electron Capture Detector (ECD):


™ Atomic Emission Detector (AED):
For these two detectors, the procedure employed with them is as
described before.
™ Electrolytic Conductivity Detector (ElCD):
This detector reduces halogen compounds eluting from a GC to HX
in a high temp catalytic converter. The HX is dissolved into a
deionized solvent whose increase in conductivity is directly related
to the halogen concentration. Depending on sample size, 0.05 ppm
or lower detection limits can be achieved. Most interferences
originate from the major components of the gas being analyzed and
are seen as an upset in the baseline prior to the earliest eluting
compound. This technique is very sensitive and simple to use.

Total fluorine and total chlorine methods can be also performed by


Oxidative Combustion Microcoulometry method, using a fluorine or
chlorine selective electrode system, or by pyrolysis, followed by
detection using an ion selective electrode.

26
2-4 Determination of Mercury in Natural Gas:
Varying levels of mercury in natural gas have been encountered
industry-wide throughout the world. It is typically a trace constituent, but
in certain gas formations, significant amounts have been found in raw gas
direct from the wellhead. Some of the mercury found in gas downstream
of the wellhead has been introduced anthropologically. Although mercury
is a toxicological and environmental problem, the primary impact that the
presence of mercury has on gas-processing concerns is its potential to
forms amalgams with a variety of metals, including aluminum. Mercury
occurs in natural gas in the metallic form. In contrast, condensate
associated with natural gas contains Hg in a variety of forms, including
elemental, ionic and organometallic. As a result, Hg is not limited to a
particular boiling fraction of a condensate.
Mercury in a hydrocarbon gas matrix at low concentrations is difficult
to detect directly by spectroscopic methods (UV, Visible, IR, X-ray)
because of interference by the hydrocarbon. Pre-concentration of the
mercury in gas to a collector facilitates analysis. Collection methods for
mercury in natural gas are used primarily because of the low
concentrations that are often present. By using a collector, the total
amount of mercury present in a large volume of gas can be concentrated
into a liquid or solid matrix. This method will make it possible to use the
ordinary methods to determine the Mercury in Natural Gas. To achieve
better detection limits, samples must be analyzed off-site. However,
mercury must be collected from a gas sample before the gas enters a
pipeline, due to potential loss of mercury to the pipeline walls. For
example, it is observed that a 60 % reduction in mercury content
(30 µg/Nm3) during gas transit through a 68-mile pipeline. Similarly,
accurate Hg measurements cannot be made on stored natural gas samples
or on bottom hole samples, since loss of mercury to container walls and
small gas sample volumes render such analyses spurious. In light of these
constraints, preferred Hg sampling methods include:

a- The dry method:


In this method a solid sorbent material is exposed to a large volume of
natural gas in order to collect and concentrate the mercury in small
sample. Then this sample is transferred to the laboratory for analysis
where the mercury is desorbed by heating and evaporation. Also there are
two methods used by the try method.
(1) Using gold collector sputtered on an inert material: In this
method natural gas is flown across a gold (or silver) collector

27
sputtered (coated) on inert material like quartz or silica. Gold is less
susceptible to deactivation by poisoning and oxidation than silver. The
gold amalgamates with mercury to scavenge elemental mercury.
Organic mercury amalgamates as well but slower than elemental
necessitating low flow rates and long sampling times if the total
mercury concentration is required. Bulk sorbent traps consisting of
foil or wire should be avoided because mercury may diffuse into the
metallic structure over an extended storage time, making complete
recovery difficult.
(2) Using Iodated Carbon: Carbon impregnated with potassium
iodide is also used to scavenge mercury from gas matrices resulting in
concentration of a sufficient quantity of mercury on the solid
adsorbent for routine digestive analysis. Iodated carbon traps are less
sensitive to contaminants in hydrocarbons than gold traps. Iodated
carbon traps also have complete capture capability for elemental and
dialkyl mercury and a high capacity. In view of these attributes, the
iodated carbon trap is used for unprocessed gas where reasonably high
concentrations are expected.

b- The wet method:


A prevalent wet collection method is to bubble gas (containing mercury)
through a solution from which the mercury precipitates as a mercury salt.
Usually permanganate solution is used where all mercury species are
converted to mercuric ion. Mercuric ion is then reduced to elemental
mercury and separated by volatilization into an inert gas stream for
quantitative detection.
The instruments used in determining mercury in natural gas are:
(1) Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS): Mercury atoms are
detected by measuring their absorbance of light from a mercury
source lamp at a characteristic wavelength. If a sorbent tube is used,
air is the carrier gas, allowing combustion and removal of some
interferents. Field based instruments are not common; however, one
manufacturer uses a direct (AAS) analysis technique with Zeeman
background correction to reduce interferences.
(2) Atomic Fluorescence Spectroscopy (AFS): mercury atoms are
detected by excitation of the sample stream using a laser or
conventional line source. After the energy is absorbed, it decays,
and the emitted light is measured perpendicular to the excitation
beam. If a sorbent tube is used, argon is the carrier gas. Air
interferes with atomic fluorescence so interferences that might have
deposited on a sorbent tube cannot be removed by combustion.

28
These methods measure mercury concentrations down to the ng/m3
level, depending on the volume of gas sampled. In AFS is more sensitive
than (AAS), detection limits are typically 10-fold lower for the same
volume of gas sampled. Because of its greater sensitivity, many portable
instruments are available that allow field-based measurements. They
might measure a gas stream directly, or cycle through a set of sorbent
tubes in sequence.

2-5 Determination of other Metals in Natural Gas:


Although elemental contamination is not usually present in natural
gas, arsenic has been occasionally found in some raw natural gas wells at
ppmv or sub-ppmv levels. Problems can occur if distribution control
devices become contaminated, especially if the arsenic reacts with other
components in the gas and precipitates form with substantial changes in
gas pressure. Trace levels of metals can also affect end-user industries
such as coatings, printing, glass manufacturing, industrial food
processing, and chemical manufacturing. Sample collection procedures
were investigated using a patented iron chloride impregnated sorbent for
arsenic, and a sparger method for arsenic and other metals except
mercury. Long sampling times are required for the best detection limits.

29
Conclusions and Recomendations
1- Natural gas like other petroleum products contains number of
dangerous materials like Sulfur compounds, Nitrogen compounds,
Mercury, Arsenic...etc, which may harm the human health and
damage the industrial equipments.
2- Some of these materials find their way to the environment during the
burning of unused natural gas in the fields or in the refineries, or
through its utilization like a fuel or raw material to other industries.
3- Though these materials are only present in natural gas in very small
quantities (traces), their accumulative effects due to the long
utilization of natural gas can be very dangerous to the public health
and to the downstream equipments.
4- Two kinds of damages can be produced due to the presence of these
trace constituents:
a- Corrosion of equipments, tanks, and transferring pipes.
b- Poisonous effects on the health of the working, and utilizing
persons.
5- There are no routine tests performed to determine these traces in most
laboratories of the Iraqi oil and gas companies.
6- No routine medical tests are done to the check the health of the people
who work in gas production, and gas processing.
7- No environmental surveys are performed to detect the poisonous
traces which find their way to the environment during the gas
production, gas processing, and gas utilization.
8- There are no health researches in the country which study the disease
symptoms, and the toxic effects that may be caused by these toxic
trace constituents.

According to the above conclusions the following suggestions are


recommended:

1- The determination of traces in natural gas (and other petroleum


products) should be performed as routine tests during all the
possessing stages starting from production to marketing.
2- The petroleum laboratories must be equipped with new modern
analytical instruments, which are capable to determine toxic traces in
the natural gas and petroleum products however small they are.
3- High level training courses must be opened to qualify the analysts on
the new methods used in determining the traces in natural gas and
petroleum products.

30
4- Annual routine medical tests must be done to check and monitor the
health of the persons who work in the fields of gas production and gas
processing.
5- The medical and scientific organizations must be encouraged to
perform researches to study any unusual symptoms on the health of
the natural gas consumers.
6- The environmental organizations must be charged to perform surveys
to detect any toxic materials like Mercury and Arsenic in the houses of
the LPG consumers.
7- If the presence of the heavy metals in natural gas is confirmed then
new processing units must be constructed and installed to remove
these materials however small quantities of them are detected.

31
References
1- Introduction to Chemical Analysis – Robert D. Braun / 1983
2- Instrumental Methods Chemical Analysis – Galen W. Ewing 1985
3- ASTM standards Part 24
4- ASTM standards Part 25
5- ASTM standards Part 26
6- ASTM standards Part 42
7- Pipeline & Gas Journal / July 2003
8- http://www.psanalytical.com/whats_ new.html
9- http://www.hgtech.com/basic/toc.htm
10- http://www.pipelineandgasjournal.com
11- http://www.varianinc.com
12- http://www.analytic-jena.de/e/bu/as/contact.html
13- http://eichem.kaist.ac.kr/vt/chem-
ed/optics/source//amps.htm#hollow-cathode
14- http://www.chem.agilent.com/scripts/cac_requestaquote.asp
15- http://www.chem.agilent.com/cac/cabu/gccolchoose.htm
16- http://www.agilent.com
17- http://oiltracers.com/sampl.html
18- http://www.gascape.org/
19- http://masspec.scripps.edu
20- http://orgchem.colorado.edu
21- http://www.chem.vt.edu
22- http://www.cmsfieldproducts.com
23- http://www.globalspec.com/
24- http://www.ionicsinstruments.com/
25- http://www.my-link.ws/set

32
The Researcher
Name: Wisam Al-Shalchi
Date and Place of Birth: Baghdad / Iraq - 1956
Nationality: Iraqi
Place of Residence: Amman – Jordan
Telephone No.: 00962-6-5621049,
Mobile: 00962-785200764
E-mail: wisamalshalchi@yahoo.com
Level of Education:
1) M.Sc. in Petroleum Chemistry - University of Essex / UK
2) B.Sc. in Chemistry- University of Baghdad
Experience:
1) Working as Process Engineer at Shwaikhat Oil Refinery which
belongs to OMV Petroleum Company/ Vienna – Austria.
2) Working as Process Engineer at Dora Oil Refinery/ Baghdad – Iraq
3) Working as Technical Lecturer in the Iraqi Oil Institute.
4) Working as Head of Oil & Gas Technologies in the Iraqi Oil Institute.
5) Working as Senior Technical Observer in the United Nations
Development Programme (UNDP).
6) Working as Petroleum Expert in the Directorate of Studies &
Planning & Follow-up – Ministry of Oil / Iraq.
Publications:
1) Petroleum Environment Directory – Iraq, 2007
2) Industrial Safety – Iraq, 2007
3) Environment Protection – Iraq, 2006.
4) Instrumental Chemical Analysis – Iraq, 1994.
5) Oil and Gas Technology – Iraq, 1992
Published Researches and Studies:
1) Carbon Capture & Storage - 2008
2) Gas To Liquids Technology (GTL) – 2006 / Won the international
annual prize of the Oapec Organization for the year 2006.
3) Determination of Traces in Natural Gas. – 2005
4) Using Natural Gas Derivatives as Fuels for Vehicles – 2005 / Won an
appreciation prize from UNEP.
5) Compressed Natural Gas (CNG). – 2004
6) Comprehensive Petroleum Education and Training in Iraq - 1996
7) Development of Phenolic Plastics prepared in acidic medium. – 1990
8) Mechanism of the acid catalysed hydrolysis of esters. - 1988

33

You might also like