Professional Documents
Culture Documents
tid=8221&highlight=staad
CIVILEA POSTGEN JOIN GROUP! IMAGE HOST SEARCH MEMBER LIST HELP Current time: 10-22-2010, 01:12 AM
Welcome back, taifur. You last visited: Yesterday, 05:34 PM View New Posts | View Today's Posts | View Unread Posts
(User CP — Open Buddy List — Log Out) Private Messages (Unread 0, Total 0) | Profile Comments
Last Posts
Civil Engineering Forum / Civil Engineering Discussion / Problems / earthquake design in STAAD PRO
Dear User:
Please Rate Us & Write a Review on alexa site for CivilEA (You need to log in alexa).
Please Download & Install Alexa Toolbar
dins12 Posts: 1
Inactive User Threads: 1
Joined: Jan 2010
Thanks: 0
Registration No.: 12377 Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
Shout: Points: 51.6 [Donate]
vinnunsam
Posts: 87
Active Engineer
Threads: 21
Joined: Aug 2009
Thanks: 155
Given 408 thank(s) in 57 post(s)
Registration No.: 3932 Points: 652.0 [Donate]
Shout: Gooooo Civilea !!!!
1893 LOAD X 1
LOAD 2 SEISMIC ALONG -X DIRECTION
1893 LOAD X -1
LOAD 3 SEISMIC ALONG Z DIRECTION
1893 LOAD Z 1
LOAD 4 SEISMIC ALONG -Z DIRECTION
1893 LOAD Z -1
LOAD 5 SELF WEIGHT
SELFWEIGHT Y -1
load case 6 is dead load
load case 7 is earth pressure and surcharge load
load case 8 is live load
LOAD COMB 9 WORKING LOAD (DL+LL)
5 1.0 6 1.0 8 1.0
LOAD COMB 10 FACTORED LOAD (DL+LL)
5 1.5 6 1.5 8 1.5
LOAD COMB 11 WORKING LOAD (DL+LL+EP)
5 1.0 6 1.0 7 1.0 8 1.0
LOAD COMB 12 FACTORED LOAD (DL+LL+EP)
5 1.5 6 1.5 7 1.5 8 1.5
**********SEISMIC WITH (DL+LL+EP)************
********* ALONG +X DIRECTION **********
LOAD COMB 13 COMB1 SEISMIC (1.2 EQ + 1.2 D.L +1.2 E.P+ 1.2 L.L)
1 1.2 5 1.2 6 1.2 7 1.2 8 1.2
LOAD COMB 14 COMB2 SEISMIC (1.5 EQ + 1.5 D.L+1.5 E.P)
1 1.5 5 1.5 6 1.5 7 1.5
LOAD COMB 15 COMB3 SEISMIC (1.5 EQ + 0.9 D.L+0.9 E.P)
1 1.5 5 0.9 6 0.9 7 0.9
********* ALONG -X DIRECTION **********
LOAD COMB 16 COMB1 SEISMIC (1.2 EQ + 1.2 D.L +1.2 E.P+ 1.2 L.L)
2 1.2 5 1.2 6 1.2 7 1.2 8 1.2
LOAD COMB 17 COMB2 SEISMIC (1.5 EQ + 1.5 D.L+1.5 E.P)
2 1.5 5 1.5 6 1.5 7 1.5
LOAD COMB 18 COMB3 SEISMIC (1.5 EQ + 0.9 D.L+0.9 E.P)
2 1.5 5 0.9 6 0.9 7 0.9
********* ALONG +Z DIRECTION **********
LOAD COMB 19 COMB1 SEISMIC (1.2 EQ + 1.2 D.L + 1.2 E.P+1.2 L.L)
3 1.2 5 1.2 6 1.2 7 1.2 8 1.2
LOAD COMB 20 COMB2 SEISMIC (1.5 EQ + 1.5 D.L+ 1.5 E.P)
3 1.5 5 1.5 6 1.5 7 1.5
LOAD COMB 21 COMB3 SEISMIC (1.5 EQ + 0.9 D.L+ 0.9 E.P)
3 1.5 5 0.9 6 0.9 7 0.9
********* ALONG -Z DIRECTION **********
LOAD COMB 22 COMB1 SEISMIC (1.2 EQ + 1.2 D.L + 1.2 E.P + 1.2 L.L)
4 1.2 5 1.2 6 1.2 7 1.2 8 1.2
LOAD COMB 23 COMB2 SEISMIC (1.5 EQ + 1.5 D.L +1.5 E.P)
4 1.5 5 1.5 6 1.5 7 1.5
LOAD COMB 24 COMB3 SEISMIC (1.5 EQ + 0.9 D.L+0.9 E.P)
4 1.5 5 0.9 6 0.9 7 0.9
****** STOREY DRIFT LIMITATION ********
********* ALONG +X DIRECTION **********
LOAD COMB 25 COMB1 SEISMIC (1.0 EQ + 1.0 D.L + 1.0 E.P + 1.0 L.L)
1 1.0 5 1.0 6 1.0 7 1.0 8 1.0
LOAD COMB 26 COMB2 SEISMIC (1.0 EQ + 1.0 D.L+1.0 E.P)
1 1.0 5 1.0 6 1.0 7 1.0
********* ALONG -X DIRECTION **********
LOAD COMB 27 COMB1 SEISMIC (1.0 EQ + 1.0 D.L +1.0 E.P+ 1.0 L.L)
2 1.0 5 1.0 6 1.0 7 1.0 8 1.0
LOAD COMB 28 COMB2 SEISMIC (1.0 EQ + 1.0 D.L+1.0 E.P)
2 1.0 5 1.0 6 1.0 7 1.0
********* ALONG +Z DIRECTION **********
LOAD COMB 29 COMB1 SEISMIC (1.0 EQ + 1.0 D.L + 1.0 E.P +1.0 L.L)
3 1.0 5 1.0 6 1.0 7 1.0 8 1.0
LOAD COMB 30 COMB2 SEISMIC (1.0 EQ + 1.0 D.L+1.0 E.P)
3 1.0 5 1.0 6 1.0 7 1.0
********* ALONG -Z DIRECTION **********
LOAD COMB 31 COMB1 SEISMIC (1.0 EQ + 1.0 D.L + 1.0 E.P + 1.0 L.L)
4 1.0 5 1.0 6 1.0 7 1.0 8 1.0
LOAD COMB 32 COMB2 SEISMIC (1.0 EQ + 1.0 D.L+1.0 E.P)
4 1.0 5 1.0 6 1.0 7 1.0
**********SEISMIC WITH (DL+LL) ONLY **********
********* ALONG +X DIRECTION **********
LOAD COMB 33 COMB1 SEISMIC (1.2 EQ + 1.2 D.L + 1.2 L.L)
1 1.2 5 1.2 6 1.2 8 1.2
LOAD COMB 34 COMB2 SEISMIC (1.5 EQ + 1.5 D.L)
1 1.5 5 1.5 6 1.5
Regards,
Vinu...
verongskey
Posts: 144
Professional Engineer
Threads: 36
Joined: Dec 2008
Thanks: 175
Given 796 thank(s) in 122 post(s)
Registration No.: 46 Points: 989.6 [Donate]
Shout:
In the latter version of Staad, you can just copy paste the loads from the load cases to the seismic definition and let Staad do the
entire process of analysing weights but of course there is a need to carefully change some load name, e.g. instead of floor load
that will be floor weights etc. It's much easier.
In the latter version of Staad, you can just copy paste the loads from the load cases to the seismic definition and let Staad do
the entire process of analysing weights but of course there is a need to carefully change some load name, e.g. instead of floor
load that will be floor weights etc. It's much easier.
Hy
Can you upload any sample file of the same done in staadpro
so that we can be able to understand
byee
ASEC
Posts: 43
Active Member
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2010
Thanks: 13
Given 61 thank(s) in 26 post(s)
Registration No.: 13344 Points: 286.1 [Donate]
Shout:
I don't see the logic of doing the joint load applied to the nodes and also having those nodes as hinge support.
my two cents.
M. ASEP; M. PICE
PICE Structural Engineering Specialist
verongskey
Posts: 144
Professional Engineer
Threads: 36
Joined: Dec 2008
Thanks: 175
Given 796 thank(s) in 122 post(s)
Registration No.: 46 Points: 989.6 [Donate]
Shout:
I don't see the logic of doing the joint load applied to the nodes and also having those nodes as hinge support.
my two cents.
They are doing the procedure above to precisely estimate the weights from the Load Cases, because before the loading option in
Earthquake Definition in older version of Staad is very limited there were only selft weights, member weights & joint weight as far
as I can remember.
At present time, I agree that the above procedure is not only tedious but also outdated. The above procedure is no longer
necessary.
king12
Posts: 112
Professional Engineer
Threads: 40
Joined: Mar 2009
Thanks: 44
Given 193 thank(s) in 39 post(s)
Registration No.: 835 Points: 593.9 [Donate]
Shout:
I don't see the logic of doing the joint load applied to the nodes and also having those nodes as hinge support.
my two cents.
They are doing the procedure above to precisely estimate the weights from the Load Cases, because before the loading option
in Earthquake Definition in older version of Staad is very limited there were only selft weights, member weights & joint weight
as far as I can remember.
At present time, I agree that the above procedure is not only tedious but also outdated. The above procedure is no longer
necessary.
In India most of the places its followed as mentioned but can you please elaborate please. I also love to know this procedure.
Help the fellow engineers can you please give example of applying wind and earthquake
02-05-2010, 02:08 AM (THIS POST WAS LAST MODIFIED: 02-05-2010 02:14 AM BY ASEC. EDIT REASON: ) POST: #9
ASEC
Posts: 43
Active Member
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2010
Thanks: 13
Given 61 thank(s) in 26 post(s)
Registration No.: 13344 Points: 286.1 [Donate]
Shout:
You have to do it the other way around define first the seismic weight and if you want you can then copy paste the seismic
weight to be your load cases for much easier process but changing the syntax from weight to load and also adding load direction.
even with the old version of staad it still the same process then and now.
M. ASEP; M. PICE
PICE Structural Engineering Specialist
verongskey
Posts: 144
Professional Engineer
Threads: 36
Joined: Dec 2008
Thanks: 175
Given 796 thank(s) in 122 post(s)
Registration No.: 46 Points: 989.6 [Donate]
Shout:
You have to do it the other way around define first the seismic weight and if you want you can then copy paste the seismic
weight to be your load cases for much easier process but changing the syntax from weight to load and also adding load
direction.
even with the old version of staad it still the same process then and now.
In Seismic Definition especially in UBC 1997, the visual representation of assigning load is relatively less. It will only highlight the
member where the load is assigned. You will not see how the load looks like.
In Load Case Details, the member, plates, etc. will be highlighted and the shape of the load will be shown graphically.
So, it is easier to assign loads in Load Cases Details and then just copy paste it to Seismic Definition with minor editing of course
of the load title in the STAAD Editor.
In Staad whether you are working forward or backward, it doen't matter for as long as you know how to properly edit them in
Staad Editor.
1 2 Next »
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this
message here.
Font Text Size
Signature
Disable Smilies
Smilies
[get more]
Contact Us | Civil Engineering Association | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication