UNPRG

ING. CIVIL
2010
Ejercicio: MÉTODO DE LA
DISTRIBUCIÓN DE MOMENTOS

AUTOR:
CÉSAR JESÚS
DÍAZ CORONEL
EST. ING. CIVIL – UNPRG - LAMBAYEQUE
CURSO:
ANÁLISIS ESTRUCTURAL I
DOCENTE:
ING. SERGIO BRAVO IDROGO
 ANALISIS ESTRUCTURAL I

PROBLEMA 1: En la viga cargada como se muestra, por el método de la

distribución de momentos con KR, determinar:
a.- Los momentos de continuidad
b.- Las reacciones en los apoyos (esquema)
c.- Los diagramas de V y M
d.- La deflexión en el extremo centro del tramo 23
e.- La deflexión en el extremo centro del tramo 56
F.- La deflexión en el extremo libre

CÉSAR JESÚS DÍAZ CORONEL

EST. ING. CIVIL - UNPRG -2-
 ANALISIS ESTRUCTURAL I

PROBLEMA 1:

A) CALCULO DE LOS MOMENTOS DE CONTINUIDAD

1.-Factores de Distribución

NUDO 2:

 2 .4 I  0 .4 I 80
K 21     0 . 35 I FD 21  
 6  0 . 795 I 159
 2 . 37 I  0 . 395 I 79
K 23     0 . 395 I FD 21  
 6  0 . 795 I 159
 K  0 .795 I

NUDO 3:
K  0 . 36 I

 2.37 I  0.395I 395

K 32     0.395I FD32  
 6  0.772I 772
 2.64 I  0.377 I 377
K 34     0.3771I FD34  
 7  0.772I 772
 K  0.772I

 K  0.36I
NUDO 4:

 2.64 I  0.377 I 29
K 43     0.3771I FD43  
 7  0.7414I 57
 2.55I  0.364 I 28
K 45     0.364 I FD45  
 7  0.741I 57
 K  0.747 I

CÉSAR JESÚS DÍAZ CORONEL

EST. ING. CIVIL - UNPRG -3-
 ANALISIS ESTRUCTURAL I

NUDO 5:

 2.55 I  0.364 I 182

K 43     0.364 I FD54  
 7  0.774 I 387
 2.46 I  0.41I 205
K 45     0.41I FD45  
 6  0.774 I 387
 K  0.774 I

NUDO 6:

 2.46 I  0.41I 82
K 56     0.41I FD56  
 6  0.725 I 145
3  2 .5 I  0.315 I 63
R
K 67     0.315 I FD67  
4 6  0.725 I 145
 K  0.725I

NUDO 7:

3  2.5I   0.315 
R
K 76     0.315I . FD76    1
4 6   0.315 
 K  0.315I

2.- Momentos de Empotramiento

M12 = -5.048Tm M21 = +14.519Tm

M23 = -15.233Tm M32 = +15.100Tm
M34 = -12.990Tm M43 = +18.981Tm
M45 = -17.897Tm M54 = +12.246Tm
M56 = -15.480Tm M65 = +18.720Tm
M67 = -21.420Tm M76 = +19.530Tm
M78 = -9.100Tm

CÉSAR JESÚS DÍAZ CORONEL

EST. ING. CIVIL - UNPRG -4-
 ANALISIS ESTRUCTURAL I

3.- Distribución de Momentos

1º 7º 5º 6º 3º 4º 2º
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0 80/158 79/158 395/772 377/772 29/57 28/57 182/387 205/387 82/145 63/145 1 ∞
-15.048 14.519 -15.233 15.1 -12.99 18.981 -17.897 12.246 -15.48 18.72 -21.42 19.53 -9.1
-0.54 -1.08 -1.03 -0.515 0.76 1.521 1.713 0.857 -5.215 -10.43
0.315 0.631 0.623 0.312 -0.338 -0.676 -0.653 -0.326 1.996 3.991 3.067
0.007 0.013 0.013 0.006 -0.393 -0.785 -0.885 -0.442
-0.002 -0.004 -0.003 -0.002 0.098 0.197 0.19 0.095 0.125 0.25 0.192
-0.025 -0.049 -0.047 -0.023 -0.052 -0.103 -0.117 -0.058
0.006 0.013 0.012 0.006 0.019 0.038 0.037 0.01 0.016 0.033 0.025
-0.006 -0.013 -0.012 -0.006 -0.006 -0.012 -0.014 -0.007
0.001 0.003 0.003 0.001 0.003 0.006 0.006 0.003 0.002 0.004 0.003
-0.001 -0.002 -0.002 -0.001 -0.001 -0.002 -0.003 -0.001
0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
-0.001
-14.72 15.175 -1750 14.232 -14.232 18.034 -18.034 12.624 -12.624 23.392 -23.392 9.1 -9.1

Momentos: M1 = - 14.720Tm
M2 = - 15.175Tm
M3 = - 14.232Tm
M4 = - 18.034Tm
M5 = - 12.624Tm
M6 = - 23.392Tm
M7 = - 9.100Tm

CÉSAR JESÚS DÍAZ CORONEL

EST. ING. CIVIL - UNPRG -5-
 ANALISIS ESTRUCTURAL I

B) ALCULO DE LAS REACCIONES EN LOS APOYOS

TRAMO 1-2:

M 2 0

6 R1  14.720  15175  75 342

1
3.94 2 X 4 
2 3 
R1  13.224T

M 1 0

6 R2  15.175  14.720  7  344

1
3.94 4  2
2 3 
R2  13.576T

CÉSAR JESÚS DÍAZ CORONEL

EST. ING. CIVIL - UNPRG -6-
 ANALISIS ESTRUCTURAL I

TRAMO 2-3:

M 3 0

4.54 
1 4
6 R 2  15.175  14.232  61  344   2
2 3 
R 2  14.157T

M 2 0

4.54 4
1 2
6 R3  14.232  15.175  65  342 
2 3 
R3  12.843T

CÉSAR JESÚS DÍAZ CORONEL

EST. ING. CIVIL - UNPRG -7-
 ANALISIS ESTRUCTURAL I

TRAMO 3-4:

M 3 0

6 R2  15.175  14.232  61 344

1
4.54 4  2 
2 3 
R2  14.157T

M 2 0

6 R3  14.232  15.175  65 342

1
4.54 2 4
2 3 
R3  12.843T

CÉSAR JESÚS DÍAZ CORONEL

EST. ING. CIVIL - UNPRG -8-
 ANALISIS ESTRUCTURAL I

TRAMO 4-5:

M 5 0

7 R4  18.034  12.624  5  61 345

1
4.24 2 4 3 
2 3 
R4  17.716T

M 4 0

7 R5  12.624  18.034  5  66 342

1
4.24 4 
2 3
R5  8.684T

CÉSAR JESÚS DÍAZ CORONEL

EST. ING. CIVIL - UNPRG -9-
 ANALISIS ESTRUCTURAL I

TRAMO 5-6:

M 5 0

7 R4  18.034  12.624  5  61 345

1
4.24 2 4 3 
2 3 
R4  17.716T

M 4 0

7 R5  12.624  18.034  5  66 342

1
4.24 4 
2 3
R5  8.684T

CÉSAR JESÚS DÍAZ CORONEL

EST. ING. CIVIL - UNPRG - 10 -
 ANALISIS ESTRUCTURAL I

TRAMO 6-7:

M 7 0

6 R6  23.392  9.1 

21
63 1 3.156 2 6
4 2 3 
R6  24.432T

M 2 0

6 R7  9.1  23.392 

21
63 1 3.156 6 
4 2 3
R7  16.518T

CÉSAR JESÚS DÍAZ CORONEL

EST. ING. CIVIL - UNPRG - 11 -
 ANALISIS ESTRUCTURAL I

TRAMO 7-8:

M P 0
 1  4 
2 R7  9.1  4.2 x 2 x1  1.05 x 2 x  
 2  3 
R7  9.45T

M 2 0
Reacciones: 6 R7  9.1  23.392 
21
63 1 3.156 6 
4 2 3
R7  16R
.518 T
1 = 13.224 T

R2 = 13.576 + 14.157 = 27.733T

R3 = 12.843 + 9.371 = 22.214T

R4 = 18.229 + 17.716 = 35.945T

R5 = 8.684 + 12.605 = 21.289T

R6 = 21.595 + 24.432 = 46.027T

R7 = 16.518 + 9.45 = 26.022T

CÉSAR JESÚS DÍAZ CORONEL

EST. ING. CIVIL - UNPRG - 12 -
 ANALISIS ESTRUCTURAL I

C) ESQUEMA DE REACCIONES Y DIAGRAMA DE V Y M

8 .4 T / m
7 .5 T / m 7 .2 T / m
7T 6 .9 T / m
6T 6T 6T /m

2 4 .4 3 2 4 .2 T / m
3T/m 3 .6 T / m
3T/m 3T/m

5Tm 5Tm
14 .7 2 T m 17 .7 16

13 .2 2 4 T m 2 7 .7 3 3 T1 m 2 2 .2 14 T m 3 5 .9 4 5 T m 2 1.2 8 9 T m 4 6 .0 2 7 T m 2 6 .0 2 2 T m
4 .15 7
13 .2 2 7
12 .6 0 5
2 4 .4 3 2

9 .3 7 1 9 .4 5

17 .7 16
6 .2 2 4

14 .15 7
13 .2 2 7 3 .3 7 1 12 .6 0 5
+ + + + + + +
9 .3 7 1 9 .4 5
V (T )
6 .2 2 4 -
- - 3 .3 7 1
- - -
2 .6 8 4
+ + + + + + +

V (T )
6 .8 4 3 -
- - - - -
2 .6 8 4
8 .6 8 4

6 .8 4 3

2 .8 4 3 8 .6 8 4
13 .5 7 6

2 .8 4 3
13 .5 7 6
16 .5 18
18 .2 2 9 16 .5 18
18 .2 2 9
2 1.5 9 5
2 1.5 9 5

2 2
3 . 33 .43 64 6

18 .0 0 8

15 .16 3 18 .0 0 8
14 .7 2 6
14 .2 8 7
15 .16 3 12 .6 5 0
14 .7 2 6
14 .2 8 7
12 .6 5 0 9 .10 0

9 .10 0
- 1.4 9 6 - - 1.5 0 - 1.2 5 5 - - -
M (T m )
+ + + + + +
4 .7 2 9
3 .5 0 3 .7 4 5
- 1.4 9 6 -5 . 4 5 3 - 1.5 0 - 1.2 5 5 - - -
6 .8 8 1 6 .4 2 9
M (T m )
+ + + + + +
4 .7 2 9
3 .5 0 3 .7 4 5
5 .4 5 3
6 .8 8 1 6 .4 2 9

CÉSAR JESÚS DÍAZ CORONEL

EST. ING. CIVIL - UNPRG - 13 -
 ANALISIS ESTRUCTURAL I

D) CALCULO DE LA FLECHA EN EL CENTRO DEL TRAMO 2-3:

1 2

M 1  14.720Tm
M 2  15.175Tm
M E  8.734Tm

6 A1 a1
 264.513Tm 2
L1

6 AE bE
 30.881Tm 2
LE

 
 M 1 L1  2M 2 L1  LE  M E LE 
6 A1a1 6 AE bE
  6 EI  E 
L1 LE  LE 
 
 14.7206 2 15.1759  8.7343 264.513  30.881  6 E 3.37 I  E 
 3 
 19.468 3
E  Tm
EI

CÉSAR JESÚS DÍAZ CORONEL

EST. ING. CIVIL - UNPRG - 14 -
 ANALISIS ESTRUCTURAL I

E) CALCULO DE LA FLECHA EN EL CENTRO DEL TRAMO 5-6:

4 5

M 4  18.034Tm
M 5  12.624Tm
M F  7.642Tm
6 A4 a 4
 296.720Tm 2
L4
6 AF bF
 28.755Tm 2
LF

6 A4 a 4 6 AF bF  
 M 4 L4  2 M 5 L4  LF  M F LF    6 EI  F 
L4 LF  LF 
 
 18.0347  2 12.624 10   7.642 3 296.72  28.755  6 E 2.46 I  F 
 3 
 15.482 3
F  Tm
EI

CÉSAR JESÚS DÍAZ CORONEL

EST. ING. CIVIL - UNPRG - 15 -
 ANALISIS ESTRUCTURAL I

F) CALCULO DE LA FLECHA EN EL EXTREMO LIBRE:

6 7

M 6  23.392Tm
M 7  9.10Tm
M 8  0Tm

6 A6 a 6
 362.880Tm 2
L6

6 A7b7
 9.520Tm 2
L7

6 A6 a 6 6 A7 b7  
 M 6 L6  2 M 7 L6  L7  M 8 L8    6 EI  8 
L6 L7  L7 
 
 23.3926  2 9.10 8 0 2  362.88  9.520  6 E 1.5 I  8 
 2
19.211 3
8  Tm
EI

CÉSAR JESÚS DÍAZ CORONEL

EST. ING. CIVIL - UNPRG - 16 -