.

MOD STATEMENT
You asked for information and comment about an alleged incident in Rendlesham
Forest in December 1980.

The Ministry of Defence examines any reports of ’unexplained’ aerial sightings it

receives solely to establish whether what was seen might have some defence
significance; namely, whether there is any evidence that the United Kingdom’s
airspace might have been compromised by hostile or unauthorised foreign military
activity.

Unless there is evidence of a potential threat to the United Kingdom rrom an external
military source, and to date no ’UFO’report has revealed such evidence, MOD does
not attempt to identify the precise nature of each reported sighting. We could not
justify expenditure of public funds on investigations which go beyond our specific
defence remit. We believe that rational explanations, such as aircraft lights or natural
phenomena, could be found for them ifresources were diverted for this purpose, but it
is not the function ofthe MOD to provide this kind of aerial identification service.

When the Ministry of Defence was informed ofthe events which are alleged to have
occurred at Rendlesham Forest/RAF Woodbridge in December 1980, all available
substantiated evidence would have been looked at in the usual manner by those within
the Department responsibility for air defence matters. The judgement was that there
was no indication that a breach ofthe United Kingdom’s air defences had occurred on
the nights in question and no further investigation into the matter was deemed to be
necessary. Although a number of allegations have subsequently been made about
these reported events, nothing has emerged over the last 19 years which has given us
reason to believe that the original assessment made by the Department was incorrect.
. am unable to comment on whether or not the MOD has received sighting reports,

letters or any other form of correspondence ITom these individuals.

 ,
~<(~C{-\. 2- ~. B \

~c;(0
..

~ ()
D
"’,
C

-
~...
I

q~
I
cr

t~C-\jD ~
(’.’
’- " C~
c.
,_\~.

r-:,

~""""’" ~\4
./
~.
L.
~-

I.
i
\

-
~.
~/,"’.
I
,

v\
IC,
{/’

~j
\::J
p(~
~
"
(’)

......,...,._.~-’~..,-’,- I

(",-j
\:::’ ( f\J\ l\!
\/

~ (~
’2.- -
It T
S
oc-
-. : Y\
\
\ctcr9
ri-3
p~ 5
4-
S @]
. UFOlol!V in the UK case 1

4.2 Establishing the date,time,and location ofsighting.

Establisbing the date ofthe sighting was relatively straightforward. The witness attended a concert in
Doncaster, and a quick search on the internet revealed that the group he was watching was at that
particular venue on 25/10/99,therefore the sighting was during the early hours of26/10/99.
Establishing the timings proved difficult; the witness’s initial estimates oftime were as follows:
Depart Doncaster: 23:00-23:15
00:15-00:30
Sighting:
Arrive Newcastle-upon-Tyne: 02:00-02:30
It was established that hisdeparture time> was actually 23:35. In spite ofthis error,the witness is still
of70-80
sure that the other times are reasonably accurate. He also believed that he travelled at an average speed
mph over most ofthe route. Using the start time and assuming an average speed of70 mph,
then inputting these details into a route planner, he ought to have arrived at his destination at 01 :46.
This amounts to a relatively large margin oferror in his estimates oftime and/or speed. The most
reasonable explanation for this is that his average speed over thejourney was actually less than he
thought,possibly due to a fuel stop on the way out ofDoncaster,traffic congestion following the
concert, and as a result ofan accident’ which he passed on the AI.
Assuming then that his average speed was 55 mph,his arrival time would be around 02:04,again using
the route planaer to extrapolate thejourney. Ifthe sighting took place between 00:15 and 00:30,this
would have placed him between thejunction ofthe Al and the MI,and the point where the Al
becomes the A I (M)near the village ofHunsingore.
The witness recalls a landmark that he passed some time before the sighting. It was a caf or pub with
the word ’Fox’in its name. Its name was written on the tiled roof ofthe building in large letters, and it
was visible from the Al on its West side. Efforts so far to identify this landmark have failed,the
’Brotherton Fox’ has definitely been eliminated as a possible candidate.

4.3 Sighting details

4.3.1 Assumptions made in the production ofthis report
The sighting details are unsubstantiated, due to lack ofcorrelating evidence regarding time and
location, and a demonstrated inaccuracy ofwitness estimates. The following assumptions have been
made:

1. Departure time &om Doncaster was 23:35 on 25/10/99.(ConfinnedY

2. Average speed was 55 miles per hour (extrapolated from start time and estimated arrival time-this
differs substantially from witness perception).
3. Time ofsighting was between 00:15-00:30 on 26/10/99 (from witness statement, though other
estimates within the witness statement appear to be relatively inaccurate).
4. Location ofsighting was between thejunction ofthe Al and the MI,and the point \\here the Al
becomes the AI(M)near the village of Hunsingore (extrapolated ftom points 1,2, and 3 above)
5. Witness estimates ofthe characteristics ofthe object are reasonably accurate (dueto his pilot
experience).

UFOlogyinuk case I 8/8/00 JMcG page 2 of4

-. .’

1he sighting is so far unwilling to

stale by now.
UFOlol!V in the UK case 1

4.5 Conclusioo:INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION

There are too many variables involved wi1h 1his case to come to any definite conclusion. The witoess
appears to be an accurate observer,1hough his timing discrepancies are a minor cause ofconcern. He
was unable to produce 1he mobile phone records (it was a company mobile, and he has since left 1he
company)which would have confinned 1he time of1he sighting. His friend in 1he preceding car during
co-operate wi1h an investigation,and 1he 1rail has gooe somewhat
Efforts to identify ’1he Fox’ have so far drawn a blank.
In nry opinian, it seems very lilly that this was a military aircraft. In spite oftheflight restrictions in
operation at Leeming and Disliforth I think that this only applies to aircraft based at these sites, and
that it is possible that a visiting aircraft could land at either base. There have been a lot ofsimilar
sightings in the North East, andI suspect thot they may be due to (possibly classified) military
experimental aircraft, thaugh I have no evidence to support this theory. Thepoor condition ofthe
runway at Marne Barrac/rs does notpreclude such operations being carried outfrom there, because in
many sightings, the objects have been seen to haver, which may suggest VTOL capability.
4.6 Suggested fur1her avenues ofenquiry.

The most important ’missing link’ in 1he case is 1he uncertainty of1he locatioo. Identification of1he
’Fox’would certainly help wi1h this.
It may be possible, wi1h the co-operation of1he witness’s previous employer to get 1he mobile phone
bill details for the time in question, but 1his depends on 1he witness’s willingness to allow contact with
his ex-employer, and 1heir willingness to help wi1h 1he investigation.
There is also a chance iliat Yorkshire police would be able to identify the time and location ofthe road
traffic accident referred to by 1he witness, which could help wi1h 1he investigation.
There are a surprising number ofother airfields in 1he area, and it may be worth checking wi1h 1hose.
Ii may be worth re-submitting the sighting report to the MOD, and it is nry intention toforward a copy
ofthis report to them, as they have obviously not recorded the correct details,judgingfrom their
response. Ifthe MOD were to co1ifrm the cause as a ’classified’operation, I would recommend no
further investigation, bul they are unlikely to do this.
4.6 Supporting documentation.
I have all ofthe e-mail exdnmges between 1he witness and myself and between myself and agencies
which I have approached wi1h respect to 1his sighting, and notes oftelephone conversations plus a
record ofthe field trip. I will retain 1hem indefinitely, and subject to agreement /rom the witness, will
produce them to anyone who wishes to review or investigate the sighting fur1her. I also have the
original written responses /rom RAF Leeming and the MOD,and 1he contact details ofthe UPO’s at
Dishforth, Leeming,and Marne Barracks.
Footnotes:
I
Hull UFO Society (HUFOS).
2
Time verified by evidence ofa credit card receipt for petrol (hefilled his tank on the way out of
Doncaster).
’Relatively early on in the journey, he passed an accident involving a transit style van or minibus
which had overtnrned. Two police cars were in attendance.

UFOlogyinuk case 1 8/8/00 JMcO page 4 of4

~;.../<-
r.
" .
. .
-,
-4"-
)
"

.~~-/ - t

- =’"
.;::7 ~ )
\/

}
~_.I-~/ r:::::, /.\’
,yrf ’\"
\\, ""

-;: - /~
’
,’"
--~
,~J
’

~?/;::-:;.~ \’v.\V ’

v
’,’
\
;./
/ ("C,\’

="
~....,./.
;7 )

-$’:"~’
..:::....,,--,-~

,
)
1
.\ ~ )\
..

~~
I

~I~’-ol;)~~
.-
O"tlftd dnIe oIlIIIng

,..;"""....
ot7"~-r.

....1.1.
~ ~~.
.

i\J(
..
Acl4tas

OrigIn

-
-N
’-’~t

S-
"7’"

__
. . ,).

".
.g.r ~~~~ -:"r’~-t
O~ / "
..I4’",.....;.,.....&;’V’l!:f;;...:...
o~ 2.0"l- _I..&~.
\ 1 . .
-
.
SL(".,W’7

. . - 1 ’
-A~.,.t-!I~ i:~
c:~
1
I

4
----..~

oS"’
N

~\-rO~.
4.~
M

~--Rus
.’--,.
\~-10.
J....,~H7
~ ::s z.o ~6’c~ ~=
""’~I....Jl..
.....f!::~Ifl~’":’. ~cc’’’’’;’’’’’;’W~e:&~ ~CJ..""!.I...-.c.....
..
.

LJJ,~Q.."T~;;;
H-oR,
NI......~ ~~.~;. ~, \
ffG?oRT
-, ~_
’........-.

.
I

.::D. ~~: ~E...

t= IA-!L (~ .:!>". . . ;L. i\~-,I.J @.~~~
A - # < -
1Ci~~~g,. C:-M tk::.2. \~..- -
~
~;:: co
’:2X){;: ~d’14T
F

~
.

c; u[\’-.
1.+-: sJ ’ll~<S.... H-I C,fl- =-e-": b.
.

J:.
’orToI........IA"iQIions.....Ot\Iy
L
fO~ 1=1 (%’:;1) TOO
O~~~.""’J Not tw T,lNrniuro"
CO!I)rcl_...... Si,,,..,,,,,. o.
F’It \IU <11’/1

OnQl\ltot

="~... Od.ep~
.
OItJeeof

!Ic......""1fo.1’10.
T
 69-
. Loose Minute

D/Sec(AS)/64/If-top~ oJ}"
I August 2000
DCC(RAF)- S02(EC)
- tct
/3

Copy to:

Gp Capt
- CC,HQSTC
DAO ADGEI
REQUEST FOR FILMING - REAL WORLD PICTURES ’RAFUFO WATCH’
Reference: DCC(RAF)1337/04 dated 24 July 2000

I. Thank you for your minute about Real World’s request and the attachment setting
out their plans for a two-hour special investigating claims of ’UFOs’and alien
abductions. I note that the company’s aim is to show that there is no evidence to
support claims of ’UFOs’and aliens; that belief in such claims can be ’deeply
destructive’ and that despite claims that ’thousands of people are being abducted by
aliens and seeing UFOs, national defence systems are not picking up any alien space
craft’. A laudable aim but we know from a wealth of experience that those who
believe in the ’UFO’phenomena are not swayed by facts that do not meet their own
interpretation of events.
2. Real World say that as part of their effort to bring people ’back to reality’ they
want to ask questions of someone responsible for the security of ’British Air Space’
and film in a radar room. However,the questions they have in mind are wide of any
MOD interests in alleged sightings of ’UFOs’. To date the Department has not
accepted any media requests to participate in ’UFO’-related initiatives because of the
very limited interest it (andthe Government)has in these matters. Agreeing to this
request would compromise the Department’s integrity and we cannot support it. In
reaching this decision I discussed the request with DAO staff; their view was that
there was no value for the RAF in participating in the programme.
3. It might be helpful instead to offer Real World a note about our limited interest and
you may wish to draw on the following paragraphs in your reply:
The integrity of the UK’s airspace in peacetime is maintained through
continuous surveillance of the UK Air Defence Region and the MOD remains
vigilant for any potential military threat. MOD’s interest in reports it receives
from members ofthe public witnessing something they are unable to identify
is limited to establishing whether what has been seen might be of defence
significance, namely whether the integrity ofthe UK Air Defence Region has
been compromised by hostile or unauthorized air activity.
All alleged sighting reports are looked at individually and examined in detail
commensurate with the amount ofinformation provided; the vast majority of
 ’~AN
"’-
,r’
, ARY

04101/99
07101/99
FOlKESTONE.KENT
GlANARFON.UANEW
09101/99 ANSTRUTHER,FIFE
09101/99 FREucHIE.FIFE
09101/99
10101/99
ANSTRUTHeR.
PEN
FIFE
Y GRoes,UANEW
11101/99 HOLYHEAD.ANGLESEA
17101/99 HANwORTH.MIDDLESex
21101/99 CORWAN.LlANEW
21101/99 HARlESDON,LONDON ,-,-
22101/99. SHREWSBURY,SHROPSHIRE "
26101/99 BRISTOL
28101/99 SHIPSTON ON STOUR,WARWICKSHIRE
 ,

"-/
, ,

FEBRUARY
o 1/02/99 BRAMLEY,SOUTH YORKSHIRE
02/02/99 SWANSEA,SOUTH WALES
02/02/99 NORTH LONDON
02/02/99 HULL
04102199 BLACON,CHESTER
05/02199 BRIGHTON,EAST SUSSEX
05102/99 CHISWICK,LONDON
06102199 HADLEIGH,SUFFOLK
07/02/99 BRIGHTON,EAST SUSSEX
07/02/99 WINCHESTER,HAMPSHIRE
07/02199 WEST HAMPSTEAD, LONDON
07/02/99 CHESTER
09/02/99 WANDSWORTH,SOUTH LONDON
10102/99 SWANSEA,WALES
11/02/99 CAERNARFON,NORTH WALES
11/02199 AMBURY,WORCESTERSHIRE
12/02/99 WAKEFIELD,YORKSHIRE
14/02/99 BEXHILL, EAST sussex
14/02/99 BROOK,SURREY
15/02/99 FROM PRESTWICK,SCOTlAND
15/02/99 DIDLlNGTON, EAST YORKSHIRE
17/02/99 CANNING TOWN,lONDON
20/02/99 EAST HORSLEY,SURREY
20/02/99 NANTWICH,CHESHIRE
21/02/99 HUMBER BRIDGE,HULL
22/02/99 BEARSDEN,GLASGOW
22/02/99 PICKERING,NORTH YORKSHIRE
22/02/99 HALIFAX,YORKSHIRE
22/02/99 OVER MERSEYSIDE
22/02/99 SKIPTON,NORTH YORKSHIRE
22/02/99 GREAT MISSENDEN, BUCKlNGHAMSHIRE
22/02/99 SKIPTON,NORTH YORKSHIRE
22/02/99 BRADFORD,NORTH YORKSHIRE
22/02/99 LEEDS, NORTH YORKSHIRE
22/02/99 ARGYLL, SCOTLAND
22/02/99 GLASGOW,SCOTLAND
22/02/99 KINGS LANGLEY, HERTFORDSHIRE
22/02/99 HEATHROW,MIDDLESex
22/02/99 BRISTOL
22/02/99 BRISTOL
22/02/99 .
ST MONANS, FIFE
22/02/99 DERBY
22/02/99 GLENROTHES,FIFE
22/02/99 BOLTON, LANCASHIRE
23/02/99 BURNLEY,LANCASHIRE
24/02/99 NORTH LONDON
25/02/99 BISHOP AUCKLAND, CO DURHAM
28/02/99 CORBRIDGE,CO DURHAM
 MARCH
, ’-/ 04/03199 LlCHFIELD, STAFFORDSHIRE
05103199 MANCHESTER
05103199 FALKiRK,SCOTLAND
06/03199 WORTHING,WEST SUSSEX
07/03199 BALLYKlNLER,CO DOWN,NI
08/03/99 CASTLEWELLAN,CO DOWN,NORTHERN IRELAND
09/03199 AMMANFORD,SOUTH WALES
09/03/99 NEWTON ABBOT, DevON .
10/03199 SCUNTHORPE,LINCOLNSHIRE
10/03199 BANGOR,NORTH WALES
10103199 CHELSEA,LONDON
11/03199 NEWCASTLE EMLYN,DYFED
13103199 RHONDA VALLEY, MID GLAMORGAN
14/03199 MITTON, STAFFORDSHIRE
17/03/99 SHAVlNGTON,CREWE
18/03199 MERSEYSIDE
20103199 SHREWSBURY,SHROPSHIRE
24103199 LANGLEES,FALKIRK
25/03199 CUPAR,FIFE
26/03199 . CARSHALTON,SURREY
26/03/99 ALFORD, HAMPSHIRE
27/03/99 KILMARNOCK,SCOTLAND
29/03/99 TRANENT,EAST LOTHIAN
29/03/99 NEWBURGH,GRAMPIAN
29/03/99 ARDROSS, ROSS-SHIRE
APRIL
o 1/04/99 AMMANFORD,WESTGLAMORGAN
02/04/99 CHATHAM,KENT
1 0/04/99 WEM, NEAR SHREWSBURY
1 0/04/99 WITH ERNSEA,HUMBERSIDE
13/04/99 LEWES,EASTSUSSEX
13/04/99 EAST BELFAST,NI
1 5/04/99 TOOTING, SOUTH LONDON
22/04/99 ROMFORD,ESSEX
29/04/99 MID GLAMORGAN
29/04/99 SOUTH LONDON
MAY
01/05/99 GREENOCK, SCOTLAND
04/05/99 MUDBURY, DEVON
16/05/99 WORCESTER. H&W
16/05199 BOURNEMOUTH,DORSET
18/05/99 BEXHILL. EAST SUSSEX
18/05/99 ELGIN, ROSSHIRE
22/05/99 DAVYHULME,NR CHESHIRE
23105199 KETTON. LEICESTERSHIRE
24/05/99 CRAIG,ISLE OF ARRAN
26/05/99 LIVERPOOL
26/05/99 LOUGHOR,SWANSEA
29/05/99 BONNYBRIDGE,SCOTLAND
\-. . - , JUNE
05/06199 BRIGHTON,EAST sussex
08106199 MARLBOROUGH,WILTSHIRE
08/06/99 MONMOUTH,GWENT
08/06/99 HENGOED,CARDIFF
09/06199 LICHFIELD
11106199 SALISBURY,WILTSHIRE
12106199 FLINT,CHESTER
14/06199 BOW,EAST LONDON
24/06199 HOVE,SUSSEX
25/06199 BAKEWELL,DERBYSHIRE
26/06/99 BLANEFIELD,GLASGOW
30/06/99 KINGSBURY,LONDON
JULY
02107/99 KINGSBURY,LONDON
03107/99 HEMFORD,WELSHPOOL
04/07/99 BUSHEY,HERTFORDSHIRE
04107/99 HOLLAND ON SEA,ESSEX
05107/99 SCUNTHORPE
06/07199 EASTBOURNE,SUSSex
10/07/99 SCUNTHORPE
10/07/99 MANCHESTER
1 % 7/99 RILLlNGTON, NORTH YORKSHIRE
10/07/99 MIG-GLAMORGAN, SOUTH WALES
11/07199 LLANGYNOG,POWYS
12/07/99 FLINT, FLlNTSHIRE
12107/99 WASHINGBOROUGH, LINCOLNSHIRE
12/07/99 BOGNOR REGIS,WEST sussex
12107/99 BLANDFORD,DORSET
13/07/99 EYRESMONSELL,LEICESTERSHIRE
14/07199 PETERLEE,CO DURHAM
15/07/99 HALSTED. SUFFOLK
15/07/99 EASTBOURNE,SUSSEX
15/07/99 PORTHMADDOC,WALES
24/07/99 BRISTOL
25/07/99 COVENTRY
25/07/99 PERTH,SCOTLAND
25/07/99 PORTHCAWL,SOUTH WALES
AUGUST
01/08/99 THORN HAM,ROCHDALE
02/08/99 BOSTON, LINCOLNSHIRE
03/08/99 BRACKNELL, BERKSHIRE
04/08199 GLENROTHES,FIFE
06/08/99 LOVERSALL,DONCASTER
08/08199 ULVERSTON,CUMBR~
13/08/99 TENTER DEN,KENT
1 7/08/99 CARLISLE
21/08/99 TWICKENHAM,MIDDLESex
21/08199 KINLOSS, MORAYSHIRE
22108199 THORNTON,BRADFORD
 SEPTEMBER
’-_/
,

01/09199
10/09199
EALING,LONDON
OLDHAM
11109199 TORQUAY,DevON
11109199 STOWMARKET,SUFFOLK
12/09199 LEWIS,SUSSEX
12/09199 SELLINDGE,KENT
13109199 GUERNSEY
13109/99 CARDIFF
18/09/99 NORTHALL,LONDON
19109/99 MARLBOROUGH,WILTSHIRE
20/09/99 YORK,YORKSHIRE
22/09/99 LONGDEN,SHROPSHIRE
23109199 IRONBRIDGE,SHROPSHIRE
24/09199 CO ANTRIM,NI
25/09199 TINSHILL, LEEDS,YORKSHIRE
28/09199 TROON,SCOTLAND
29/09199 LEWIS,SUSSEX
30/09/99 BROCKENHURST,NEW FOREST
OCTOBER
02/10/99 WARRINGTON
03/10/99 DINNINGTON,SOUTH YORKSHIRE
04/10199 ROSYTH,SCOTLAND
05/10/99 STOCKPORT
09/10/99 CALNE,WILTSHIRE
10/10/99 FOXHAM,WILTSHIRE
11/10/99 CLITHERONE,LANCASHIRE
19/10/99 ILFORD,ESSEX
18/10/99 WIRRAL, MERSEYSIDE
18/10/99 BATH
18/10/99 CONWY,WALES
20/1 0/99 LIVERPOOL
24/10/99 EPPINGHAM,SURREY
24/10/99 KINGSTON-UPON-THAMES
25/1 0199 IPSWICH,SUFFOLK
25/1 0/99 HALIFAX,YORKSHIRE
25/10/00 STOKE-ON-TRENT,S
26/10/99 BENllECH,ANGlESEY
31/10/99 LlSBURN, MIDDLESEX
31/10/99 DULNAlN BRIDGE.SCOTLAND
 NOVEMBER
v 02/1 1/99 URMSTON.MANCHESTER
02/11/99 CAMBERlEY,SURREY
02/11/99 STOKE ON TRENT,STAFFORDSHIRE
06/11/99
06111/99
KNOTT.END-ON SEA.LANCASHIRE
HANLEY,STAFFORDSHIRE
08/11/99 PENICUIK,SCOTlAND
09/11/99 lEOMINSTERlBURlEY GATE HEREFORD
10/11/99 LlTTlEHAMPTON.WEST SUSSEX
15/11/99 BECKENHAM.KENT
16/11/99 GT PlUMPTON.PRESTON,LANCASHIRE
16111/99 WHITBY,NORTH YORKSHIRE
17/11/99 MAIDENHEAD,SURREY
18/11/99 CRICK HOWEll.GWENT,WALES
20/11/99 MARKET DRAYTON,STAFFORDSHIRE
21/11/99 ARB ROATH,SCOTLAND
22/11/99 SKIPTON,WEST YORKSHIRE
26/11/99 DONCASTER
28/11/99 PENTRAETH,WALES
29/11/99 DAGENHAM AND TilBURY. ESSEX
29/11/99 STOCKTON.DURHAM
DECEMBER
02/12/99 LANCING.WORTHING
02/12/99 THETFORD. NORFOLK
03/12199 LIVINGSTON. SCOTLAND
04/12199 SCUNTHORPE.NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE
04/12/99 NEWPORT,GWENT
05/12199 ST PETERPORT.GUERNSEY
07/12/99 NEWPORT,GWENT
09/12199 WOODBRIDGE. SUFFOLK
09/12199 LINFORD. ESSEX
13/12199 NEWBIGGIN.BY.SEA. NORTHUMBERLAND
13/12/99 WINDlESHAM. SURREY
15/12199 WITHAM. ESSEX
15/12199 NEWLANDS. GLASGOW
17/12/99 SWINDON.WilTSHIRE
17/12/99 DUNDEE.SCOTLAND
19/12/99 PORTSMOUTH.HANTS
21/12199 BANCHORY
28/12199 SWINDON.WilTSHIRE
29/12199 DUNDEE SCOTLAND
31/12/99 lEOMINSTER.HEREF
v
’;ry- -
GEOGRAPHICAL
DISTRIBUTION OF
x
SIGHTINGS REPO~IAt
UNEXPLAINED AE
TO THE MINISTRy’r!D
DEfENCE IN 1999 OF

...",...,,,,,\. \
~.:,d
\,

’f-
X
x

/!~;.,(" ’i-
;’f.)(..
- x
.c;. "’Xl’>,>’-
j(..}(.’X’j..;<.
y. ~f.
XX.
J<’

7
)<. ;<. -
J’.
7y.<1J. <x;:t.
x.
x

~~~
._j ’l .- . . )(.
.
r
)t x.
~
x
)<. x

x "")Co
X
X x

v’
.

16.acWY\S~
:,~;<,~
. ;<’,~r~
..,
~&- -.) e -
, .
d-
-: : : -
\-,0-5 Z 17 e<-j
CA- CO................0-0cL.c"’j
0’-~J k-’\1’e .
v 0 ve. r C> 0
k. JL ’"L
j
e. !’JATo
v<.e.WI.*:.r:: . - y .:B "^-5~/ 12
e:- o~e.

~
I (O’zJ J 6ee
0 r>o

0< eve"
g,
. r
"’.f
~
~l,-ri.peSJ . - E ’ j -
~o ’
Jer-Lf"\lnj
V
00 r : - L &
. . . .,~
’^’ rk’ ’’1’
cr>J":’
L c:) CY> e
I.
C>

,
r’
ry>
nUmber’S
e 5 G<
I

f i’E’o.. r
I

\:\~o-e co--?.Z?-.9 ?. 0-. ~ ~

or- J" k<:e-r ~LeZr enj,’nes rr>(’,..,ZrY>o.1 noise/

~u->Je.. ,<",<,1J~r2e’S blefY"’.

s \ - e .
C0
0"
()"" I6j 0" 0 I
c;.o.. b 0 \’.~. 0
f’ <’<’ / j

lH~ Jf.J
o--Ioou~ v- -<"’
\ - . e . < w \ - . e . < ’ -
~) te~Q-Z<’.. frie,..,J
.)
0... (.>’:>(:>’j,
""’j Lke.,
<.A-rr"iveJ,
00

, .- ~ . - 0- ’-\ 0- \-.’.J-0 b\--eZ,cop&er:s"

L 1 e
3 S
<->-’ v- 7.2 l-e CA. ’r->
\vJ\-e.0
wo-.~ lr- Co--.r CO,--r--L<’’’I cI
r-. e . , - . 7

- o
~ "’" I
’"^
.J
0

I
"<’ \ ’L

.
.’

\’-o-Zki"’j, 0-’- \ol’- s\...e’<""e Z<,-..e~

C/’-. ,( J0. W 7: e uJ I .__
. . \:; w ("u . D (
\ e S

’Zu-rJe !k s<V’o--U cblc.dk

(C>-r<"e <"’J\-.\" over he.r u be. w,",e.,e we
Skoel
"\_e (oo--sb(or--jer

",ol:-~ <-el ~
(oLdl
l\_e
Lir-e
\.-eLC.ofler6 .,.-,0 l,.\-e,. . .-, 0- SL)\-ll
1&/t,} C>.?.:3. :’
\;~e ;GA~
*’0....
llej

See
0 -
J:sf’7ojel
\.-C^-l ~()S~ ....~o
S \ - J - . ~ ~<:
\Jeerel

l....
f7 l
(A(.No"j ove,""
A.....Jwe
....J Z ;j
CO~e
<) ’"’ e 0
F
l: ;

\-ooSi:-
uJ\.- e0 <^-0oller’\--ouse. Of’f’05~~e~Of/0’-’
,Jv-J ....--o,rhL"’jl o.-fbe JCl.....J

’-
0- ~(’jl’"’5 (Llu.ck heZ2-
Of’
cu’
S\-.Oyf’’’’:Ji
~
(ow
.so,<-.-,(~
COf~e(
o U

J \\_00~ i.b h- \-."

j\.-l
( 0- ~ D- .- e.’-’0-
,<,-O-,rouJ’0
0
e 6 l
e. r
flew

k ~c I
.s r- r
e
0
J"-~Je.’
............i:5S.l-r>j

-
W0-5 JOl’--j
j
,-
0 (j
j
u ::,
50
f e.~ Lit.. e
Zow Due,

’J 7 W
l::c lo.-~l
<’ e
0
’L
J
DUr

() r

?" u l
,
’ COf
GL. W
\.
L b

wo--S 0--6
Of’ o u ’<0 ,1

~~e
u
l.~I!:> (}. . 0D--((’OW ’("oa..-J\ JE"S:I< o u & :
L l
r-5 \’j .....cw.
-
\0: \Of’r<"’ l", ’("Y’">or,....
t-espor>Si {,2e.-
5ome~oJjl or <^u0~or’""0 ~ounJ &0 &e
pI’. ~
-f
,
,
~ ’:J\~_\ ’"",
~...-’"
’-
;
^’
...
)
.
1
.." .’j
) i of ,;
’:

"",’
" < 1’,
. . . .’"’"-",)
~~ ~
’(y"
/ ""oi. "’, ’

JJ)
~ ’~Jt~
~~;p’f) .’,!!!i==i~l =~~):~:
ft: 1s td~~
..
":,s,,,
=:i!"
~iU

~~
j,ii:
"’~r’.’i’~ .’Ii’
di!
,jo"I’ ,"’. ’"
(:,)
>J’’’’
,i~; ’"~
:~~! ’~
I""~,;::::;,::::]
~:;wl_II;!IIJ.,5i;;;~,,"’~
. MOD POLICY
The Ministry ofDefence has a very limited interest in alleged sightings of
’unidentified flying objects’. MOD examines any reports it receives solely to establish
whether what was seen might have some defence significance; MOD looks to see
whether there is any evidence that the integrity ofthe United Kingdom’s Air Defence
Region has been breached by any hostile or unauthorised foreign military activity,

Unless there is evidence of a potential threat to the United Kingdom from an external
military source, and to date no ’UFO’reported to us has revealed such evidence, MOD
does not attempt to identify the precise nature of each sighting, We could not justify
the expenditure of public funds on investigations which go beyond our specific
defence remit. We believe that rational explanations could be found for the ’ufo’
sightings reported to the MOD if resources were devoted to so doing, From the types
of descriptions we receive, aircraft or natural phenomena probably account for most
of the observations,

MAVERICK TELEVISION QUESTIONS

Q.I How many UK UFO sightings are reported per year?
A.I 1997: 425, 1998: 193, 1999: 229

I should however, emphasise that these figures relate to reported sightings of

aerial activity the witness was unable to identify. The vast majority ofthese
reports will have mundane explanations, such as aircraft lights, weather
balloons etc.

Q.2 How many so called ’alien abductions’ are reported in the UK per year?
A.2 As eXplained above, MOD has only a very limited interest in alleged sightings
of ’unidentified flying objects’, Abduction is a criminal offence and goes
beyond MOD’s specific defence remit. Anyone who believes that they have
been the victim ofa criminal act should report the matter to their local Police
force or the Home Office,

Q.3 Is the figure rising or falling?

A.3 See A.2 above.
. Q.4
A.4
If a member of the public sees a UFO,whom should they contact?
As explained above, MOD has only a limited interest in these matters.
Anyone witnessing unusual aerial activity that they wish to draw to the
attention ofthe MOD may do so by telephoning 020 7218 2140 or writing to
the following address; Ministry ofDefence, Secretariat (Air Staft)2a,
Room 8245, Main Building, Whitehall, London SW1A 2HB

Q.5 Does the Government have an official position on the existence of UFOs?
A.5 See explanation of MOD policy above.

Q.6 Is the whole UFO/alien phenomenon taken seriously by the MOD,or is it

regarded as the domain of cranks?
A.6 Within the limits of MOD’s interest explained above, investigations into
reported sightings are carried out ifthere is corroborated evidence to suggest
that a breach of the UK Air Defence Region has occurred.

Q.7 Of the well known UFO sightings in the UK,how many remain
unexplained?

A.7 See A.6. To date no ’UFO’sighting reported to us has revealed any evidence
that the UK Air Defence Region has been breached by hostile or unauthorised
military aircraft.

Q.8 I’ve recently seen the following comment:’ there is a D-notice on all
triangle sightings in the UK’ (’triangle’ being, presumably, unfologist
argot for triangnlar-shaped UFOs). Is this true or false?
A.8 The Defence Advisory Notice (formerly known as D Notice) is a system of
providing advice and guidance to the media about defence and counter-
terrorist information, the publication of which would be damaging to national
security. The Defence Press and Broadcasting Advisory Committee have
advised that there is no DA notice about ’flying triangles’.

Q.9 If a member of the pnblic reports a UFO sighting,what steps would the
MOD usnally take to investigate it?
A.9 See A.6. Reports which are usually very brief and vague, are examined by air
defence experts and others as necessary.
. Q.I0 Ufologists state that the MOD department responsible for UFO
investigations is Secretariat (Air Staft) 2A. Is this the correct name?

A.I0 See A.4.

Q.ll Are there any UFO reports in the public domain?
A.ll MOD files are subject to the provisions ofthe Public Records Act of 1958 and
1967 and generally remain closed from public viewing for 30 years after the
last action on the file has been taken. Files have been routinely preserved
since 1967 and are released to the Public Record Office at the 30 year point. It
is therefore the case that files for 1967, 1968 and 1969, and any from the
1950s and early 1960s that have survived are open for access.

Q.12 If so, what is the procedure for obtaining these?

A.12 Members ofthe public are able to view the files that are open at the Public
Record Office, Ruskin Avenue, Kew, Richmond, Surrey.

Questions 1-4 Crop Circles

MOD is aware of no evidence to suggest that these phenomena are caused by
anything of military concern. The investigation of such matters goes beyond
MOD’s specific defence remit.

Questions 1-3 Cattle Maimings

Mutilation of cattle or any other livestock is a matter for the civil police.
 -EIDGEN SSISCHES M’UT OEPARTEMENT
D PARTEMENT MIUT;.:RE F D
DIPARTlMENTO MJUTARE FEOERALE
DE?ARTAMEN FEDERAL fiiiLiTAR

~t:~! EMDDOK
ERSC:’:LO;
Infonnatton
Infol’l1ation
Infonnazlone
Infunnazlun
.......
3003 Beme, Ie 28 mars 1995
~.~F %’cPY4A’tbL
Communiqu de presse

Le D partement militaire f d ral et les OVNI

Le D partement militalre f d ral (DMF)est de temp autre confront la

th se qu’it serai~ en possessior d’informations relatives des objets
volants non identifi s (OVNI),mais qu’iI refuserait de les publier sous
quelque obscure raison. Cette th se est fausse.
Le DMF,comme las autres d partements, transmet ses documents aux Archives
f d rales, d s qu’il n’en n’a plus besoin et les Archives f d rales les tiennent ouverts
aux chercheurs, J’ ance du d !ai de r serve l
toute la litt rature dont
gaI.
elle
La Biblioth que militaire
dispose ce sujet et, de plus, Ie
f d rale tient disposition
Commandement des trcupes d’aviation et de d fense contre avions
des informations ce sujet el mis disposition les documents}’ relatifs en sa
-
(CADC,c.,) a donn
possession.
Le fait est c:ue, comme dans nombre d’autre~ ~dYS, diff rentes instances
administralives du OMF et d’autres d partements, ont eu, par Ie pass , dans Ie CGdre
d’activit s courantes d’appr ciation de situaton, s’int resser une question
d’;3clualit , fond e ou non. Elles ent d s lors collect el interpr t des annonces
sporadiques. Les rect.erches concemant I’histoire de ces effc.,,1s rel vent du domaine
des chercheurs scientifiques, qui ont accs dans :e cadre de levs travaux, aux sources
des Archives f rales, de m me qu’ la litt rature de la Biblioth que militaire f d rale.
~NSTITUT DES HAUTES ETUDES DE LA
DEFENSE NATIONALE
TITRE FRANCAIS: Implications militaires du ph nom ne des
OVNIS
AUTEUR MORAL: DIRECTION DU RENSEIGNEMENT MILITAIRE
TYPE: Etude
EDITEUR : MINISTERE DE LA DEFENSE
DATE EDITION: 02/1995
MOTS CLES: OVNIS, RECHERCHE,
RESUME:
ETAT5-UNIS, FRANCE
Le present rapport, propose de fournir dans un premier temps un aperu des udes
men es aux Etats-Unls, pays o Ies autorits s’int ressent de longue date au problme,
ainsi qu’un aper u des udes men s en France. Dans un second temps,iI dressera un
panorama des implications militaires du ph nom ne ovni, qui peuvent re r pertori es en
6 cat gories : I’ I’utilisation du nparaventn ovnl pour I’espionnage, 2’ la possibilit d’une
menace dlrecte, 3’ la confrontation des forces arm es des objets non Identlfls, 49 la
possibilit d’avoir des t molgnages se rapportant des programmes classifi s, 5’ les liens
entuels entre les tudes men s sur les ovnls aux tats-Unis et certains d veloppements
technologiques,6’I’utilisation du ph nom ne ovnl en guerre psychologique et 7’ Ia
posslblllt d’avoir des t moignages se rapportant des objets ou ph nom nes Imputables
une Intelligence fondamentalement trang re.
Ce rapport fait aussl office de compte-rendu du symposium sur les ovnis qui s’est tenu Ie ler
f vrier 1995 Creil. La DRM a en effet re u deux spialistes de la question: M. Boudier,
qui s’intresse depuis une quarantaine d’ann es aux ph nom ne ovni et M. Gresl , ancien
pilote ayant trois reprises confront des ph nom nes qu’lI n’a pu identifier. A cette
occasion Ies conf nciers ont remis un certain nombre de documents la DRM dont on
trouvera la liste en annexe 6.
TEXTE :
SOMMAIRE
1. INTRODUCTION
2. L’INT RET DES AUTORlT S MILlTAIRES AM RlCAINES
2.1 Le projet "Sign"
2.2 Le projet "Twinklen
2.3 Le rapport Durant
2.4 Blue Book
2.S Le rapport COndon
3. LES TUDES MEN ES EN FRANCE
3.1 Le GEPAN
3.2 Le SEPRA
3.3 Le projet SPOC
3.4 Recherche priv
4. UTILISATION DU npARAVENT" OVNI POUR L’ESPIONNAGE
s. POSSIBILlT D’UNE MENACE DIRECTE
6.CONFRONTATIONS ENTRE OVNIS ET FORCES ARM ES
7. PROGRAMMES CLASSIFI S
8.TRANSFERT DE TECHNOLOGIES ET TRANSFERT DE CONNAISSANCES

~O~ ’:E~ :~;~:>~g:~ ~ ~ ~ E~ ~ ~ ~ RE

8,1 Possibilit d’un transfert de technologies
8.2 Possibilit d’un transfert de connaissances

11. CONCLUSION
ANNEXES
LOCALISATION:
. INSTITUT DES HAUTES ETUDES DE LA
DEFENSE NATIONALE
Les preuves scientifiques
TEXTE :

bgjour O tout a commenc

SO ans de t moignages. D 1947,on parle officiellement d’ovnis,et on ne cessera
-plus d’assister, dans Ie monde entier, des apparitions inexpliqu es.

L’affaire ROSWELL
En France aussi.
Les pilotes parlent. lis sont commandants de bord ou pilotes de chasse. Un jour,its ont
vu quelque chose et, souvent, les radars ont confirm leurs dires.
La vague beige.
Poster. Soucoupes,disques,c nes... Toutes les formes d’ovnis d crites depuis SO ans.
On ne peut plus nier Ie ph nom ne.
Jean-Jacques VELASCO dirige Ie Sepra, organisme fran is charg au sein du tr
s rieux Cnes (Centre national d’ udes spatiales) d’ udler les faits a rospatiaux
inexpllqu . Interview.
Oes objets volants bien identifi .
L’ nigme de la Zone 51.
Les myst res de la Russie.
Les scientifiques brisent Ie mur du silence
Pour la premi re lois, sommlts scJentifiques et mititaires fran is d battent de la
question ovni et abordent tous les th mes sans tabou. Pour eux,Ie ph nom ne existe
bel et bien.
Le dernler rapport OVNI des Am ricains.

Un chanaement total d’orientation.

OVNIS : d’ou viennent-ils ?
Les ovnis viennent-ils de I’espace ? Quel serait leur mode de propulsion? Les
astronomes savent-11s
essentielles.
quelque chose ? Tentatives de r ponse des questions

Les hommes du secret.

LOCAUSATION:
0-283 (1)
. INSmUT DES HAUTES ETUDES DE LA
DEFENSE NATIONALE
MOTS CLES OVNI. FRANCE. DEFENSE
RESUME:
Le texte de Cometa,association regroupant d’anci<<=ns auditeurs de l’Institut des hautes
tudes de d nse nationale (IHEDN)et pFsld par Denis Letty,g n ral de I’arm e de
I’air, reprend une s rle de t molgnages accumuls sur I’apparltlon d’ tranges ph nom nes,
tant dans Ie monde qu’en France.
"L’hypoth se extraterrestre, en d ulsent les auteurs du rapport, est de loin la meilleure
hypoth se sclentlfique; elle n’est certes pas prouv e de fa n cat orique, mais iI existe en
sa faveur de fortes pFsomptions,et si elle est exacte, elle est Grosse de cons quences."
Mime si "aucun accident, et a fortiori aucun acte hostile, n’a eu pour orlglne certalne, du
moins offlclellement, un Owni la perslstance du ph nom ne, estlment-lIs, devralt donner
lieu une "rlexion sur les consquences strat glques, politiques et religieuses
qu’entra nerait une ventuelle confirmation de cette hypoth e".
Le g n ral Bernard Norlain, ancien directeur de I’IHEDN,souligne, dans sa contribution au
dossier,que "des problmes concrets se posent, qui appellent une F ponse en termes
d’action".
TEXTE :
SOMMAIRE
INTRODUCTION
10 PARTIE FAITS ET TEMOIGNAGES
Chapltre 1 FAITS ET TEMOIGNAGES
Chapitre 1 T moignages de pllotes fran ais
Chapitre 2 Des cas a ronautiques dans Ie monde
Chapltre 3 Des cas d’observatlon partir du sol
Chapitre 4 Des rencontres rapproch es en France
Chapitre 5 Contre-exemples de Ph nom nes lucid s
20’PARTlE LE POINT DES CONNAISSANCES
Chapitre 6 Organisation de la recherche en France
Chapltre 7 M thodes et r ultats du GEPAN/S.EPRA
Chapltre 8 OVNI : hypoth es,essais de mod lisation
Chapitre 9 Organisation de la recherche I’ ranger
30 PARTIE LESOVNI ETLA DEFENSE
Chapitre 10 Prospectives stratgiques
Chapltre 11 Implications a ronautiques
Chapltre 12 Implications sdentlflques et techniques
Chapitre 13 Implications politiques et religieuses
Chapitre 14 Implications m iatiques
CONCLUSION ET RECOMMANDATlONS
ANNEXES
Annexe 1 La d ection radar en France
Annexe 2 Observations des astronomes
Annexe 3 La vie dans I’unlvers
Annexe. SL’aff!ilire~SWell -
Annexe 4 La colonlsatton de I’espace
La. d
-
nformation
Annexe 6 Ancienn . du ph nom ne OVNI El ments d’une chronologie
Annexe 7 R flexiol’! SUr divers aspects psychOlogiques, soclologiques et politiques du
ph nom ne OVNI ..
8I8UOGRAPHIE
GLOSSAIRE
 ...

Apr s Ie rapport STURROCK sur les ovni, les

fran aisembo tent la pas aux Am ricains.
Les membres du comit

COMETA
rem~ttent aupr sidentdela R pubHque
et au Premier ministre un
rapport confidentiel sur

"’-",. . . <.:’,. . .; ,..~- ~. ,’f ". ~ .

Les hommes du rapport: L’ing nieur en chef des
mines Christian MARCHAL. Ma tre ALGRIN, avocat
la cour. Le G n ral de I’arm ede I’air Denis
LElTY, I’amiral Marc MERLO, Alain.ORSZAG,
Ing nieur g n ral de I’armement, leprofesseur
Alain LEBEAU, jean Claude RIBES, Ie G n ral
Bernard NORLAIN.

Nota bene.

Si ce rapport strictement confidentiel a t communiqu

aux m dias, ce n’est pas sans avoir obtenu I’autorisation
des plus hautes instances gouvernementales
r

. The I.p..$j:itute for Higher Defence Studies

The Institute for Higher Defence Studies (Institut des Hautes Etudes de D ense Nationale) is the
successor to the pre-World War II College of Defence Studies.
Placed under the authority of the Prime Minister who approves orientations with regard to teaching as
well as research topics,the Institute for Higher Defence Studies is directed by a General Officer.
The Institute’s missions consist in :
. providing in-depth information to senior officials, senior officers, private exealtives from
various sectors (economics, research, law, cultural affairs, social affairs, press and
television,...) with regard to national defence in the wide sense of the term;
.. conductinglgenerating studies or research themes regarding defence;
lending its support to universities and other organisations concerned with teaching, providing
information and conducting studies in the field of defence.
.
The Institute organises several types of sessions composed of male and female auditors aged between
35 and 50 :
a national session organised in Paris each year provides the auditors with information
on the main topics to be discussed, enabling them, through committees, to conduct all
kinds of discussions and reflections in connection with the French
capabilities.
SE!CI.Q
and defence

regional sessions (four per year, held alternately in Paris or overseas every other
year) in which working methods are similar to those of the national sessions, although
the length and content of the studies differ. Two themes are addressed, one relating to
the military aspects of defence, the other to non-military aspects, i.e mainly to civil
defence and economic defence issues.
international sessions (created in 1980):
.
the yearly venue of the African and Madagascan session gathering officers and dvil
servants, both African and French, aims at promoting better understanding of the
French policy towards the countries concerned. In 1996-1997, a number of African
countries which were not classical co-operation partners such as Alge a, Egypt,
Morocco and Tunisia were able to participate. .European sessions which were initiated
in 1988. In 1995, a European session gathered in Paris the 27 member countries,
whether associates or associate partners of the WEU.
The Institute’s will to adapt to current changes, to vary and diversify its activities as well as to widen
its influence is aimed at enhancing the dissemination of the defence spirit together with the link
between the Armed Forces and the Nation. This has led to the recent creation of :
IHEDN seminars for young adults which target an audience of students and workers
aged between 18 and 25 organised in the Paris area and othier areas of France :
Five topics are addressed over one week :
> the geo-strategic context and new threats,> the European and world-wide economic
environment,
> defence as a global issue,
> the military defence policy and its evolution,
> public spirit, individual responsibility and citizen commitment.
spedalised seminars aimed at :
> a targeted audience : Members of Par1iament,. Prefects,. magistrates, company
managers, local representatives...
> students specialising in defence as part of a DESS1 or DEA2.
training sessions in the field of economic intelligence.
Each year, the current auditors as well as the former ones (nearly 6,500 of them), gathered within 29
regional associations holding membership of the Union, introduce new reflections which are the
subject of reports whose summaries are forwarded to the Prime Minister and the ministers concerned.
The works of the various sessions and research committees of the Union of Associations are published
twice a year in the IHEDN review<< ATHENA >>.
The review, which also includes articles written by officers and other lecturers from the IHEDN, is
published and distributed by the French Documentation Centre.

1 - DESS (Dipl me d’ udes sup rieures sp ialiss): post-graduate diploma on a specialised subject
-
lasting one year.
2 DEA (Dipl me d’ tudes approfondies): post-graduate diploma taken before completing a PhD.
TOP ~E-c:RET
<<!sf\RD NSAN"D NA-\"\oN L
Tt-\RE::AT
TO ’~~
S~.o,)(\Tf
uN\\"E\) K\ N~DDI\’\
TD ’WE- R~LEVl\N, Ot=-F\CE.R(S),

~cv
f\&.V\. ~&\
p\eoSe
-thi:- ~V\.~c.-b’()V\
c:
~\-\:;\e LAV\.d-~-ea\=~\MO~.~~
ex\:.C
~au, ~v cl~v

\c(o\e:-;:1\C:~\
D-t &
cl \ \

((3~c:e
\:\A.~ -
e9.~. ’ c\MVV\.~d ~\:e~
,/V\.{Jor\c8J^Bt:)),

6 - ~ese-
\ : : I .
V\7

A . e~ ~- \=~
cSV\.d

- pec~
IV\
SL
&
UvC t~
.~~
JOA~
U^\~ co4tr-tf\I\\<\~(\EjC::\OVV\.
09-(,"~ClJ\\8\r\~
\
-9.c’"evx’d~
V"’^~S~\&
~ \ef)

&102-
- ’
~e.of\~.9- \\.’\

~~\.- ’-~ O~
b~ e,c’~\ U\V\.d:ex’-
r~\c&\Ioe\ei~
\ieAS
CoV\.\:..ro\ o~di.A~.~e.. (-Ides
V\\
~~r Wo:
M~’\ic& or
\\1\ AVV\~r cGh.
 f’
\be
~~ta.. ~
LA~d..~roL"V"\C\ \Od~
w i-\:1r\ X’8x=t OJ\\a~

C The o\~~ O~cl\\ ~\,eV\SJ, - \=~"’-.

.
v~\’.::)’no\..S
&\\~ V\V\VV\&V\. or
J.c::h.e- ef\:\~ ~{-\::A’v"\o.~;,f ~e\@-
’o~&\~clC~
\e \J
~e\\ v\’ ’~C.’v
V() OL
~. o\D

~~8
.

CD0~^,\~cl.
DV\. e

-a~\&-t"’-.e. .\::>-Av,n.e\\\v’\. 6\;-\c- ~-w"^-\.~~

-\::JAV\V\.e\S C’<\’S-"S.-
f\V\~ \-<(\V\o\oVV\ \QV\.\
e. . 6~S
, o\a~J ~ \f’
\ :.- \o~ 1’’"8
\
VV\\\~S fer
~e..
av-. -o\, ~d
&VO\. ~~~<f~\ C>~ ~,,^,e
-ex6IGt\VV\erl
o~~clrw\.o\a~
~e~
\.AV\.o\er
C
~ ~ &1A.d\-’c-h~
wor\
’",e\ W\~\V\
a \\
\
UV\
"oe\eNe"
.
hV\vvtlV’\
C0 \o~J~C V\Qj

0=’^tN\~\o~. .I,^e.. -\: OV\.-S c~

V\. G
C (Yc\\JeS
e><fEX\(’\/\.ey~ ~_V\ \\e,/’\.
o\
CCV\.o\

~~
VJV\\c:h
~&II\ N 2.\
- CCOU\~
Co.l\.c:eV\.~\oV\. CBVV\fB
\l’8V\I\\Y\..[j Du\c:.-~ ~\2
wO<QE>

\ Y\ Nlv\J
,~. Pcr,O,vA-L.- ~D
1.i Df!-
:
e:
h(;l AsA
"It-tIS
U
L6A~-r
N
’:.
~(.."’r f v C , .
:DDVI

t:;p.....u.<n
. . - - r ; . t . 6 ’
Lt>V6

- j
(\JGCGS:Af2.’-1 ’\l) (~’
L-tv;,I\1c, {;rJ-nT’-(,., fD{!. 1f.I6’-j ttf\~
f-CAb f \-R"f’H.
<;6LV0
t I -
. 1
. H
f \
T ’.- t~ y
ON’ -I G- +- iA-~)
Q:fr!t5 N ’THIN’C,
C6L~ ~’VZ.~ 12C5TJ’r N(,
" "’"
.
i
’RC,N
i 1-(2o-rW]fJc.
I So
\i6R.K-I\
~"’f:fI
Ai’

-r/-t {111f ~b~J) ~f5ll..I!:.~M: ’n5R\

Fl6L.{}S y;: wc-;’rIf, "KFt" <;:,Pllur, fo1(’JJ::,ff{6fr" /&)0’-1
6/11

~flf1-rr couw’- (<<srPNC,

0f1
fi,.ll)
Ccw~
I:L<>AW,</i-L
U.c; ;I
vSH,rC.us.:-
A
D5ND</DS

P1I9...lJ
DP-~ 10

Y
C\

I !~fT ’ c.oMPASSfS l1> DOY .AflJP> rr 12> A

cr ."11-tC I.- L’O Fcf2-

f:Rp,e6 \f6-H1CL6>) ~)(~tJf\U.’1. ~f"TtNC:;
~6OP6c-J’61CPo~f
C
Pi6l>--tH6 ~’i
1 -t6PrR-W t>"-tI1ffy
IrJ"’f6rJSi
e.46L’-{
IN gD ID
I
!I
cR6ArC r ,
,
6U_LDN
J - r L v P -
ON
a - l
Y
AtJ PAIL.6/’) AuSD’
.

c..D~L- ~rf2.lT.s{tFC,.frN"TO
~ MiS ,

I’
!
i
’1HC
N~
-:U- :>~
rJ IC;N~ C
~, Lf)vJAL-
.

.hI6J<J H61-WI.--
IlILU S
D

\0
~51\i

-(/-
N -rH’6
DiU15’f2. i)ev-LvNS
Hb~
’j’). o:rr
L

CAA7-’-I, .--rttbIlSf}NMCf’ W~. -ro-I2P-ef’lciJ,

. c:f;-.6D"-.r. -:ThDU~ L S Lf’f
c..<0
V’DL.S, -CAv~tNC1
?:R1f-IfS
6D
--’to.
"JAL N
’
Uf)- 1 U C , ~L.j,
.
~-W,~
~.
fWD
HttD. HAD
C iN
f>LA
Ref
["I ’

.:eJCfIl
,Ht~’1DNi: ..f5t.1G1..itL",
o , - / ..-ifib -m;-\<JNGILC ,~.pS .M{tPPJN~’’:-Gi(li)~~Rrr
UfDN

-:Jf.i.6~")’1iNb\
YDN \
.

I. .,ct:.;:rH<5,’ I~ ,~..rr NAS’NT.PRj~1 . ~Qb ~tv4L

~/}s;fH,6QD 8 J:>Y "f#’Ji>- W.
I1 ,

.j, h}~~’f...~ G{(.~S

I ’.f\WG..

< S V ( ) - t A f!AeF ....w-:

1.,D1i~A~ .~.~ I ~.~S ’{)6"SGF.N fWl!.;O’P ~.
.

6
~~oML’w~.
+,.! -/I’fro.,t)u./:lI...fZiS:J rJ (;)
f)~..)C~ I’>>
~-ro -n-IS- "i:.f’I.e. T ~~.
ff’S&.P,. "SC:;6~0) DfJJ\A-l1’i, W:.,o:>Jt- N~exr- z,;
..0fP6crcF.~~ "s-iRY-
frUi5N f2.A’C Jfll..1t cl::; ~I\bJJ,)~~

~t)
f5l:-TtSIZNf+u:Z.$ .DUA-Llz..st>
c
RN . ()f
r - . ~
,.:+cr ~ t - .
J..: { .
\Ii
I
3
::r&":c.Hf\lO~.’-1
L
.
Q.i"Jr-!NINC,ONJ’t.crrt>Rs rr .~&~
6usf’t1-fJ.NC, ftND
.~.f\.~..D,f0Q...I:.T
..IS:

’" 1 -fr- "1l-/tZ. 6V~-rJtI~!’

P6’~Ct6\l
~OIVW"’SI~-1I-l ~i-!Ao~ -fW-\~
~noS’-"V-\ ~ tfn.!4rJ~
ftND \"16(25 O,fflCU t <{
ftSCENC6D
ONt>
\

A-~’
~ ’Q.U~ ~
I)ISaov’
~~ ~.~
,
~
OYui- "
DDV’r;S
.’
..
+f
8L1
! .
:,

uP aY ’1N

~ ~
.
1
" t> ~e,dbl>Di

~ pSt:,:
m1 n iU.io6\fS of 4
iJ
@6S~\
~~~, ~
tVtNf){<.6t> ~1t21K
fllJW
, q -
p,J.1J..W1
~I~
/
IH
~R.
p/!.S’ ,-a-e/0Ji1,t:
rJ&J..
’1~ r\vr r- ~ S6r-.!/~ ,..ji-I6 fi.-Y
:...
~ ~~D’
.,’-
\
IN
i4ol/Qtf
"
R2\ jUtS\’JtI1 To f1
GoT

~
..’,
kWRVJ,)~ ft J/ Ib,Cf) udIRs ANt:, fm2
.’1ttIS PAium
i 1U6" N1)c tv.OM
’\l~7b~S , OUr<. o;j-tlC;~T ASPve(
N&:/I. SrJI%S ()1J11-i’s, pl.ft1\lt
S
!.
-PQ-/1t.
HA-~ f2~1FDR- PR.L.o
cJ1)ST
\J’/5
y\
tflC:;UJ DlJW2,;, -O~GW<ro j..Jf{iOf OSJ)

,C.
~A f1~
r~ ’i1-J6 ’3!)C(!-t
! lHbt - \ - ( 6 IYN 16N I 6L611&’1\1 ,
/OM\Gi{>>J. fWD 4t6lP,
K
"’\}J(( DLf1tt QihR.l7)’J6
". I
 I
,.:1,,.
s i
~~
1’192
HAD ~b~’ ’iffiCi-S/- IAt1
A’i:’6 fLIJ(5
p,ND A

~ Pf.2fCP-cFt~-\-lS’ or
TO {2,ySCI)tJ
(BNSci
Lt>-f15Wl, o CDvJso,
’liSf./
g
6I}l{D~,

~C
A-SS[X;1/’f;rfJ
~sOJpf’-(’.1;- DtRuCil.’-{ i47/H
.~ 5l-
,,I’
iI’’
1 110 rJ o C!0>f 11GS rt4v6 IN 4
~ ARKll- f7ftf$ -UP~
,

~~:;.’
I
’I
hUI54

i
hw.
bf
fjLSD

4t~Ic’ N
j
tACH
[bNSq()\JSN5SS tt{t,

C6U6Cflu Cf;::i-’:s;a~Nr>:’S;
Pe>e1~ INc,
H1- f IS. ~
Of’ !’ffir’S
5 fI

i jr
flfrNc
ThfD
uN iM
CffJT) ps(li.w
PL.-US
df ii61qH,
c rJSc:.toLJ
f{:f;:s.,/t:LC f"’D {)) ,.li6~75 6Ui. i
’

~’
\00
N
C;tJ6L6nDSbf7.~ f\1’J1J
S, ft1 "Ti-li Sj

R,(f\!
i6)
IfTc:t:.6SS
’&;f1 IT
INIS fJ6V)~Y AND f<}>Wj$ /I, "y-nS IS
\H,S’ A l2..iC;Jf\J IN AvS.WAufT, ~
\

Df271T7
1f-I,1’s I-15Vr5I.-
.
i (2ANCE tw1C;tC
1,(’f[,~fHT5 NffH ~..f
CW - HALf

t!to\l’<s~
-s6
f’Q:;W. N ND
A5t>-r
~o.rr ~ 6l-~CW~, "m
ck’- 11-fD’
USV
nVD P
(
Of

+tFfvI
,
C1!iN’SCUfV&~S
SctVVS{\/tQ".:, j,.~ I-.: () f’tff
;J
Lt oN NSc!.. S:~; iS
is

PIL Af’D ~- \-t6 "f:,r(;;U.Je:, LtJv’6L of (uJX:-

~~ P6\!i2. PWS 4No 6\lDSdH;j’ f ’ ’1-tIi’

(!(f

~
I
\ liAs
I -i L6VR- a;".J-Sauv ~
i I
IftfPt, i[1ffl6 r2f!rJ46 of’ C:;W IS f12Dn nW fDDT 5!.J1JcN PeEr
~:
I
I
IN ’TI-lfi of’ L . s .
i ~A -I ~ ~’Nc.l-6~T/’-j ~ {2lA-L-nI
i CJaNSQ(JJ~
,tz.J)
(2fW45" or: f li-,C
1rP Ae \3Ac:K ,N iN
ft{:J) R>/2:(0\ -S/;<’
l

LS f/2Df
SN5’SS
/IJ ’1b &’
’
lJ.J’ diIZ()r1 ~ntrs,
(ftoJ PrS ,
I)6 DlQ.Lj f’CtA’j/V t’xJT fTS
cb/PtSf.. \

~ilJ "~ ~ ~ Pi-L~"1l-t -rJ-tU2. ~c.+i~ .

if’ IN ’"1/;f<.oIS: U>vl5L IS uPc,/2.AC: 1#T6 err: INWfW] 1
I’
!" hPrNI~’/)"’; tr N6
"I{M ,~f1/
~LO 13m
rr J" {2JAi., ) IS f’J(5i -,..IL\$
.
()/JR- ~(3lf1’"
f>61N’c:.S" ,Nt<<;> IJJ{#. uuro, A=r
of’ c~~~oJ.sf\.!J’
W\/’tn-
!
d’J21--1’i LS- ,~ R.-~
,.J’SCtcV~s
,

f\.1S V’1
I!
t
1/<;;’

~ ’ ~ Y-6~v ~ALWA<-(..( ~ ~~~~-. l. -v6L.-S

il5V~/,.j’C,,~
r171u 1’1 SALL A
c;,<SU’i OrJ’6
res ,{::6\1
(

tf\Jr, I f)0c0
IS f>6 r

N
S
l.J V II\SC:; j
\
N 14
n\’l
,!

’}
,,,
!
If
’rNr%S
86dlVSD
lf1. v6, 1U6’

’~&D~ .4f1 -f L-cc~~s. ~1N~

i t\)6
; L{i)J
iiHO I
foJ.J
b
U~v.Nk
. / ’
P.
I
’

) L - . o f
f\T’J
-
is

~V15

T7M.!>lNC,
C
\s
f’J T

~~ C~f ~
~,
HAt/1NC; Pr
q>D11bl2.4 i.A>2>S, &INC,
Gte ,’"T4
L{m\/6
L...6t\UD
- tflC,iil fl,Us TIi
t>
Otf 6
HIC.,~/tJ
IN CDrJ OI.
\

I
jPivD

’1\.-t ~
:A H 4t(’
f~,
iONIc, WK
~
Fi:51s,
.’

~cN
U"
f’f’1b tfE’lCH i2Pp..sc,r;
f
-ift
c flP t,1K Ff;Pr,
V1v 1<;;
c/?
/1ffS fJi"iY PI-us "’thJD
’ 1
F
l -
(f tJDC6S~ :s7i5P
~t
/ffift5L- ’~CAN
U
- t/D"\D..11-<(fZI\1
. 461’"
At"O
J5 PIS W1R~
fi

UV?,0
S

’5;’
1V-f ~ {-’f/.6 ~
i
l"i f fWD f1CHifM1;(\ eN t
:11 :
;~f
\J c..cU..i5Cttiv6’
f76(!61<.Lj is Dt P UlO61’d’t UP ’1H
1lfY;Ar61C fI C>F ’1U<> ffll, So i [\ Wb
rtD ’E/h/1’G,
 .
Lt
",
1<\16 ~Av\54-tAO
,,+tIS’ f;~$ - ~C
PovR
NDJOONc..,
AL- ~ L U vd
\)
If’!
,s .
N C. ~V\IANS: AND
(2-
Mp (
U~-
m SLL!(\ tV
~UAi- .
~. 1~h

y. -rut~’ ’-1
16v’-Il>ND

~
f1S
AND 6ncm
6x:tW.LCtSl\!IS
PDNbPR-.nML-LI unNIJ1)
-ro
(8’=S, ":, _ P6Rill’i\11 ’i;k~S A-C:jAIN
lJl’-’~().rf
6f0B(<.(;, HoP6pv(..{.,’-j,
bfNF\L ’1i1e., Cttt
()IN

’+-tAilS
1k0>v~V S
’S,
N
PAiR
.
ND OUfG
()
’rJJ

/N
j
!.(,:-,
’~6~, :S
’~P ~0M,S, GR.f’{cJtY1fIDD~,26"1P ’~+tI - r D c .
(:J’/JI\!

’f~~(
I-i - r-M-rt\o’1 ~c."\1-I!5ttZ ~/6S~ p
’ QQpm Nc; ’11-tb’i ’iS~6’S A2DfT ’&NRLi5 o uPD t’H ’isiLVCS I1
tr (/
6f\
6

DNc.y v- JQ-Y 1H6L.j \<..NON \-MN TV~()

’ I’
I
Gfi f;n0T1DNf1’L. i
UrJfu2..IV(’IA1’tSL-’1
US, ,’!1-l6I(2.
rJr
I -
-
r
:
Ir
-
1f..t6
v
< >
~ ~
L.i ’S.’Nij). jl,. .r~ )NT6LL6C:fV4-LD1
-rH1: :’ D!<~IS. t0AiP-i ,

6f10TIDrJAL- Ct f
~.
IJs,
Y ’A-<fJf)
(bDD/6S
Ce
1v-J’i’Acr.,
;U~
1
r < - b
,rWQH u
ITdfJFrS’
,
,

,- I
’ !i\
i.
I,’,

o
.- .~N’11-I6flfrz.-D ’l1-i6 PAP. "’I1-f1~ ~U’~
f1(61P-’,
~T6l>
()L.l6’C1JfWcD
(05’f\’U~
l;.Vuf’zQR Q,6J2,DL-u’DN Rw5N--i hi
()~t7Lj’1 I>QwpK:.’ ili’I
D B v - ’ 1 - j
if i

hr~(jt.t
+~f’S
. t’ft-tAS
t-L:\. !AY.5, D’:s~,.,s
,---Tk{~
,~’ii2-l
flA6HIN6l2J1 ’111’ AND l

f ’
2 T
- J
< -
t
~1
>
’T1H’ 1 ) -
v-J’5~1>N l 6 ’ ,N"r
\)~I
~’ f t
N’
Ii!.!

U - o r - : :
/G
’ I ~
,

r, I’ , :,’1,1

Bd).j~ v~ ~VJ~~~~~6:~:~~ ae. i(~j

kJr (2cu6S cc> I
’TOd&:6$,t~,~
Ac..:~S ,(2<. ,~tr-S:, ~t AtSD
f

y$ ’W’ . ! I li"i

~ (j ,t5nt

~1J.\;P.
~Wr-!’c.S .N~
41- t:~A-cQ612-~A.
0(2. <)~I/’JC,
PI2-on ~AL-
oNIf1

bf0c f’1iZb
’?f\JlNJUJD
4..0v
1 f - i\
.
Q
" \
ottJ ’1H
AGoL61l
\.
. J - A )

o
NO
F 0; ALL:,VPOs, I " Ij,"
IS

L..DSo \~ j
i ’iii
uN6

- q - u \ ~ , &b--P~
\

vt-lU~L6S
.sfL
.j

i.:t-W-j ~~ "J
I i
bN,
.
II

" 1 : 1
i i!

\.to\.) .
-1U6’ "fl-!t-MA
"iO\ifZ 6!Tl t>N
f1 6~
D~
\12-cMA-L-L "t’11 - tA(U/....4)h~y
~!1bilt,{-J, "ID6f1b’1l i \ J
~
S()\)~{. (.1f’ LlP6~
C.prhJJ2.
4

~M{’TI> Use flN’1

A - L .
AL.1

NblilliS-r:"
6V6N"i
,tJH6tJ Li d\J OA1\lIl
’1 D’t> rJ &r tlNC’’TO \Jf: tW Y ,II’
\l
Nl\1HjlN~
’
/ -
, r
. t
- d-
IIil > :
V
I

DO’1I’s’
4\-tt ~s i’t’l

1-tf’i’\IC’ A- ~1’ N~L-

n
\.s r-Jb’Doro, N~K.-NMs;.
<"
l\!TAL....
l’
’i
. I
\

- r!-iC
f’INC, Nf’ll>
’~ n~A
\rt-01J 6f’ ’(’-{.
N I5TJ
15~f1L. \
ONLy
Jt,6’Y.
AL&t> PJI’.I~ Peo L6f1
I, ’~’1S, fr u I rrAnl)tJ.J crJ
<t1ICi-H ’\J eprqJ A:;’C (\ bif) r-Js’IQW0L
ft.fW
fT
U:>C JC p.wD OD’-SN’T
NrtH

"1 fd(.11
j

- i6o-n OC-’ffiV6".)~NtrL
G" <;iLffl’’’
~ Rf1-f1.L-
~vC,t-I. r>f ’f<-
- 0-Lt.\’1
N?LL
e . E -
IONFSS
CRffi1D[) T
\J PO s
6TN f6N
QU tRt
t%JLj
b: ci1J J.J~R
i N
WiY
I
(N~\W-
f\,t\{Ji1
S
f\j~ ’I
 Ie
CAf’~(lM~
’-
)<.:n512NAL-
(J6T’At L.(.J
r
flA6!+.NaLY
-
11-tj2.{NC,H
L - \eft’!
J L - .
I

I f t
r
N

P -
r 1=kL6
Llf

I J . - j . l
~ll
) frN(.
o{."
~C.H, - r{.I1s’1 A
OK AN"’I

ANc;.61- -
S
.
Af’J G~A-L.- Pu=\r6.
5 ’TD

-~~r1.- ~ n I ssm
Cifb
s;.W6~ f(’<J) Cj D, WHD ATrbr]pns
\

’1~ TO bAS,J"
nA1<.S HA-J
c(2,gmc:qJ
!

I N ~i-vctf!92 -I’--if& 1.-u

DDffTH
DNG W1)I’"
"i1--u2.c;pS. Pil’b " ’ 1 - f epF6t:-T
AS D
oF’
/ i - ArJ
t J
ON

l - ( . D U
11.-
I’

Il’
i
AR-6
~Q<<S of sPAC6
-
I.J612. O,f’S~6D
r v
VCC6l>1:J~ ’
CN

P
nflNl-}
,

O~
f\S ft~H,
’ r -~
~
l-ov6" ~
J I
PLftN6S

wK6i2-6- -
-cHG r t - U ’ - 1
I’

i.rr
l’
r4

~
ptUo
’i. -"1on,!>NI’\t...L..tC,’(.. DP. cf\fficrT’-i-t’O ~~IN
~~ J Y
~ - 1 + . e
;1
,~i:
;it

I
.
iT
~1<.D
~.
rrJ N~
otJ
fi26
is.
~
~ ~1.&- ~~ 6f’1’U./ ~~ ~ ~.~
)
Oftlls( C SCJoVS
I
R
F.-FWR
l.f!1’ lCj’~q "11-l,si2EItss ~sl2-tD or IUC"
Cf’.N ~D 10-#0
F1f’/D
C
ft0r’1
D/v6 1 S

.
~" t 1
($NDVD U P
~(::b f" ti~ LwS(..WV5~ D~Ni:’J
-
A>J<bZI ~Sl)<.. A:. v
AiD I
fLUS T7J
- t ,
~’W()
P t ,, lAN ,’AS
c;..e.t.
fU,iS ’1W " " "{7-t
I
of

~c.
oS <NO ,
~ Cbr-J~o~S.
J"’f-t,ICH
f\i<
fG/6J2 /\t<LJ
I - f C
IS
pLf#’!6T::
v
-:rte6’.-
IT’v-r~
fI1

! qe;.1) N’t
’If-/f)
)

pt2i \
of
tf$ D(~t
U6tL )
f ~ ~,
~
()5 CbJjSaqJ&%3SIN

~
I
i DI()S 1&1 S

-rwo ~ ~ P~PuL.~Gtf(PoR.t/.s"TI-ff)
D~DS, If U&iJA{..IJ1 ’AR
"1H~~S
&
Pr
~ V
U:>~C; P
,. <q)
cK ""’11Y\{)
F,R’iS(

~\{. .t6 A-N"c:j,EUC~~ /U"’AL-fLSj.{~A- ~16SP6l:>r:u-~fZ1 -. t~s.~ ~-W- J1. W .

.11

flS~
e

o1/l512"lN’
ov
1"0
1

C;QJ
OVLb
<J <TU<> RN(
V6(2J1
uP/)
fl.6Si
r
P,\)1j’tJ:)\.t>N ~ff’J
(frVN ,
,

~iJ2D 1>
~Lj
IS

~ -CvD t
C.OtJrf-tltJ.S {11J D SPIlLers.,
1

,I
.I
.!
, I
\HC
Nirffl1
()1JtI ,.J
-
ov6i<.~
C
( ~
rJSCloVS}JS
, 1/ vNnL-
~~Wf-t61J ~ ~ S/-lOOI~!a-i NAL- \.-Xf>R5IA-..f-rJbu-.f5" ~.~c..-i(fJ-.CP~I;,bj-t~,/’~oSLb-1 -l[
fbVl D
-
1
Af2<J
- 6
ISrJr I . {\I 1
N -
li6N S !
\1L
. A N
" l.{IN
IHb
PFfTI’’r{ N

~
C
(yI)f) p,fWJ 51
tp{j1 NlrN - J5f<f1US
y,<f\J Go t
}

.j
AcJ1ItIL
W"j.J.~l
ANI>
- rJ ~
K 1W"Ig..{
f164:Js.
c;
~M<Jf\NC6 of" II-jlS
uc;fi"T""",
AARI"’mlICS"""t1-/(.#- ffJv Lll6S PIN INc.i<.ffiI L>1

1’i.1UPT"--1H
SkAA> cfr’ PV1/1’i::\
(2AIN~ VCIlY Q>JlcK~,
~ B!J’t..
-rA1’C-tU-:> -rf.~IC p. Mt-U/2.~ L-wP.:5{1NP-(1.pJ
I1pD","
Af<.c:;..NO
&>(;1>/) c:
vl’bufll-
t,j D v -r.1/2rJiS ’Th ft -f6> foC
CD
’1D1 C, f’lZM {<rom~.
" "’tf-/6N
(

f’"IJJx,Rfjj
IUR.oUCil1

.
!
6"tV RJf</Jl$ 1f:> ()I:;rR.frVIOI p{)~pU:, 10 fI
,)
L.ll’lbINC,
AND\Cj,{laN.
"I6UDN ~iT6 uCjm-"1Uf\T""" S/-(>tJL>-I
R c:;E,

~I
.~. - M-6j,6,W ~
J
,.
WID’.
I t\~ W r /OtJ-S ’-1’{{1()
1\ "\t.{PlcAL trf-AflPLC P~j5
Atj15s, <J
1
l?F./\t / fVC,S
’t;"Dp(SPJ1fJ) ~D ,rJ ’tF "Si~~ F’F
p66l rk y~c.
10
- r
~ ~ T~ w s N
NDS,

-
,,0 1’/?N<;;, Go A"\’3.-/C! p.m
3. r7 p,ty):\4rt
SDW/’JDS f} ~.2.D p.!f1- AND 161\1 M
S
4-’ .(. I N
I
A
1f)J
JN , D
Au.o
{.Ul\.A5
WU>

~ -J-1H6O
u.o bt~
H~S
Uc.itr ~I C;.ffl1 fIi!. -S ~ N’L.(. . &-I\I D<
\IN\)~
I

o~c,f\NISfk1()’J.s . . - r
Nu
~ ( CJN ID
W
’- l. INOVS

~-s
L

HA’ ~D ,f\fc,s
I UCr
1 f’l 6NCzU)ND Y ANI) ,ND ()()T W \N
MiS, PI ff’.vJ IN vNrb sVffWS , r’l
’’E.
o~AN\.SA11~
L6otv -
- U.f.o. :5f12.~6 A-t6Nol1DNA’ (\’){.Wu ~~,i:.
Ar OfV,U I;;.i1I.{’S ~) S ..1V0.~ Pt~IL ’-/ ~ /. ;.-;
’,.,

CHU~ S,":;" I!ILG)(oea.sns

c.(:\.A. c.l tC
,.
OfM. t..sJ.(.(;JfS rJO\I&f ’5,6.1.
A\)\H6(2.ITl~ -
- A\{IA;1-N PLyS A/(Z1 8(}Z\/({. ,
..

G I.Lt:5Gtf. - LjCIC.. 0Y
-
tJ6It.f.(.tPtP-S - ca. . <A/’Jp
-
-",. vN\ I/ s.rr;ys;... P#/LbSD,57’S ,grS’ bOL{) q
D@IN!
’1ti~{1~ r6bP~ L
f4\-tDC0NQ()c:r P\K~@6~’\l~
i

~
({)nV1tJNI~~ A:;6~()./ -
-"~. ’t-\ ’-1f-l.5’ e.usoP- (fJP1-/. - - ro c N~
..
I
AAvI

~
i

.1 -
I
P. (J~~ Ntt1-I. t-Jo
<

I-.H.t (.,u ~
1. . CO
’"
.,

+ /116
: 15’
1f\lff
a{:2. fwG7 ,crf
Pi
Ft,ere... .
6
,

r oJCS
i’

-l , i
, ..

,
1 !

I,
I: &s~f"’ (r ~ U{<.C() .

..j~~~\C;17-:-\t=c ~ -DIO
!
f)’ \3>
t\
CY1<J3<S-\9 )\.O:S~p.(I\.
1S S,AI1IN; .’ H
PA$ Kvk , t\\ m
t’z,Qi~~’-\SN.c:vLK,\~’1.
is ~,,.
AM Hv M f\1~
II
\\SfllRJJ
\,\<fl KllL.3E.’:SV~~I,-Wt1 T~~KC PEDfl.E 0P?,
.

A~E:-K ~
a. ~o ~
.\
i
’j
~
If\u\2~
\t.~"::,L~\)yt
’Ail:>
I
’ISO ~f+si’<E:~1 -’1 ~\\. fRoM
r\t( T’fb;;:p+iTitIC ’I’lii"l, ’L{\(!,t~\1_
~\\\<; m:::, ,
~j",\~~
,,
I.\\JV . i - \
.f\~CiDU\\.~j~; [kf\
, t \ . ’ n4oU~\{ ~~~0 rN f ~K
~\\\D ~ELW10 \:. 5’
+ ~\,\~ uf~~ GIIQN~
qj\J\\\i\\4f\E

’
_~~O’\)~LO~~d>4-tQU t:-. ’"
C41.W
i
I
I.

...
.

.
... -

.....
J
00\Bt;t~
.
.

~exR,...
. ...

--n~1. 4

~~~.~S
I
’\;\1 ’).A ,\6~O\)A\1 ~l.
.

.
.

\ tJ \N.r,

~~’)
.....

I ..’
I
f\ L C\
\ IN 1’\
..~.. u.~..’\6\f -’~~(J
~’IRiJ .~.
I
~
\~,~\t(~."
~~iI ~~\ \::\~S~
.

...\J\\t>
.

~\’\
0J V
(i
0\\~’.1. \ )

~
~~~ ~ "m-\\~- ’\()~?-. ~~\’-.~ F-\ \-
,

1
i
i
I

’O~
O~’v\.’0V LDW <?tof15:>
1!CJ
Lo\ \-\tl;:)~lf

O\I’R
" ’ \
\\ v <:. +z. V:DRDj
\ I t\

~
’0.{:1)
~
I
W Pit -n’n f\CJi I

<q- f’R-s ~ *-t ~ ~~5

V\ 0
I
~LJf.q\ ’" "SOt\e\M\\~c" OJ\. ~R r c.t\U3=: -n1 ~f( Mt.-I’
{\ii 1’\~) ’.

P
AI,I $.5;. (J
,." ~.1"
.
~.. ,
I, frI"
d’.

or- ~oW~
..’"
’_ ,
,i

1G(~ .1. .) .’.::;,’~\-ON~ e f!’ ,

oJ-
"’}_/

He\) (5 F\.::V In JfTN~\j, ~

\i.!,
’
I

- \
fJ~iS

~c.f\ PIt-< ~ 0\ t-.>~

U4 ’\
\~s
m OJ ’fOLL0W

~t1f-Ak<;’-t>’~\ ~Rf:.~
-~~
i
fII.i l)"S.t \

cfi T\J.-\\J\:oJ\) U ’FtilS:>~~

I

"’::Q i ~\7~ ( J A ’ - 1 B

~’Ai
.
I
:.
i

I
I
RE:
t\()

~ ~.
q &w v’%:. 10~ U J<f:. ’\ou ?t~11tbRt..
&:R~\.J
Y\ \J\n~
\

~’t:. ’t=o~ f\

’\~~:
qoc:. \’\OiJt2D"\ ’::.\1\ I\J~ ’
i
. .

~,,:"
f ~~
I ’t\1~
’"V- ~.I-\~
TIt

J
Q.;I,~1,r_S,
: I
,\oVMw~
. I,c)() ,~\O\
\
L
- )
-\
~
~o
J..1f>\T
~u"’OV ~,\Jh T)i~CTw\~..
9’E:’~a;.
lCu’ ,,’
. _
GVLD\lSJ.
KWW JH/fT

~bEs
’- \ ~
’igLJ
f1 o ,p~
I\\l . .-Mfl
~-
.)
,
d t’\(SS

~~ 0
0

Q,
"K-~oS ~~~ ~’1 ’1
~R
<\1.
,I
\-\\JYQIJI\
i

i
\ti..\~~S
I’: , ~C)\JR ’
)tiS I2\N TJH

.
~ ~Vj~c;
\T \3 KIM i2RUN’(\.
I
q l\’ tJI \I VI otJ<; ).F DOOY 01>1 "’8AR.,
~(;;:: YouV’LAmi
.ftl ~\,a I~ )f-1’J"\ 0i -,-,/L.
r:.
~I y~ON~ 1.\0 ?ffiu Th IN f\-r,\.{8- ’v~ -tH. ~rrr:s ’-\ U v At4.:

~~~~i~.~~.~~~~~<p?
QlPC) \j
0<;;’1
]
’SGONT
i\:DT L\O\J R0

’Q ~ ~ L- t:~4)<:. ’\ ~\.-:V1’~\J#\"
l’~
\
Pt. I
~\\ 11RE.
g
\,\W& ~
0 ,r}-Rt::
4 . r f
tb_
I 1Jf~ ~~,
L\
’{Ol!

- S \J?
l

&1
.

G’ ~ct:J-
. \

Q) YOO
J
)

~~~\,\’t-\~T
OI-J.
Qj ~()~ .\\\A::X’\

\ ~\\~ ~:\\~\)
E-~~ll-t\\\t,
~ ~ Q . ~ ~K f)
BR0\

~ltl ~(=\’{J:) \s’ \T fI rc’r[~’\\

~\\KIM
.
H8\<:R"
.’

~ ~ R&~~.~\-f ~ ~ ~
\ b .

~
i

fIB 05\ lti

f\’
n,1 ~,~."
~,.~\-\"\.
\\j ~d\~
1.~RJ
~
. . .’0 r-
~~.~. t-i~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~~,~"toN
~ ~~-r
...f’9E
\
..~
VRtf1U~ O
\O.~
,\~.br>\J
~J-tli\.
\’\vR~ FA/’Vl\,-\
..

c;,oo
~-$IRD~LW.
c.IQ:R
~b..
0])\(_

\.~I1KB..
\T4iif’\
U
C)~On1 R
~f<
’If\\’S.SMJl\ I,
~
I"tr\ . .

{\r ’-’8’.$ Kl~

C? A
G;X:1... K,.. f\GIC ili
QVl I
.
I

~ ~ ~ ~c-,
\ . . . ..

\JO
I.H~ LUX:.-
..\\00 ,cxrTC
..JT\::::’.If\L~
r::\\o
~O~...IIfD ~f;N1i2’) Ili .’

~’P"\...I:::c::J.
,~ \-J.I1~~W;.,’-\’J\j ~ ~
~~~\-\\~K . - ~~s ,-, ,il
:

~- ~s~T ~
.,

;~t\~~. Q~ ,-\00
....J.1~ ..~ pcr
.,..

W~7
RiLl..-~..
\ \\1Wb
.~P .

f1~
,.’
. SZt: KINO MD LlFf:’\",
k{(.(-
R
cl
’ - \
. .

,yf’t\l!J:\ c Q
E..vE~V\ J-tBut. Hi.\. ~.. ~o0I To
]

~.T\)
’\00 pNQ
\~~
’1+1
TI\\:::. T/~S ~1:t~ To
~i
DjCj
00

~~D 8Jl2K S
l{OU

"\OJ nf’lli:~ w-cTrt \-’\f: d(

40
i
~LL\
i#1~-
,
\ -
i ’\’E:.f\~c’AcND a\.!
\ A
(;L\...Dl,) ~CJPCE
~~\.J\J ti-\A
HI,~R1<. ’\Dr\T-IE::.
\

P~. \
\7b
H’I’S,
’{ U\-\,~
f\~\.\ ~(( ~ \ii

KNO\-J I;I\.-\f\r ’-\.o ~\~k..

11l \JAl\ \W\\
8. ’-\ ~
IS

,~
,!
.
~’RKffi
K~
I .Pv ~<5Tl\O~-(I-\6Vq.,tTs.TQ
~5
I ,Uil.\ ~~~l-~\m-
~~\\-~
’So ’) "’Ou .f\~ ~()Iv \’. iw M~
11-~AsE.. ~\\ _
’P*’
i
’

cc::’ kc.{\so~ ~o
l\j\j~,
~o\) i4~f\~~I\\J~ l1\
~i\l.Q’
\IE
A~D\ of~’L,~
l\,\ F F\!{IL-I\
\)~~
SlC/

~
<-1
0 I GULk)VS

\\W
\)
\ \

1.
l!
!
i
1
’J/ ( , ’-i’: -k. ~ ~ C~I-\’- \
\ ; . ’"
Q.G. T}.j \-\"’-ou "T’-\,NK\’:- PEC:9LE
\1-tvW r~11: D -
Q

G( T\-1IIN!’-
,Q.. -\~ T~\~k A~~ ~u..
’\’\)\j ’~"’~’:
’\

- \
c

)ThINK
J ~t\DW
\<;~~o~
\-If\\JS A c~<S"’.-D
1)
j \

~a
J\N

’-\’00
l{
\
"\c.N: ,T-
- A ~
Q . \ : . .
IJ \j

, \~~O 0\1
<::if
l:P\S/
~ \f
-n \J ’:;\\C()WJ (1G

I~t<..0 \

A
Q
,

~~ rQt2S"- ~~ " -
\\~ ’<:. .\ ’ 0 t
rJor T9,Js
\ E\
\,
\J

\
G\tRt.qih~~6
~ -l.)i,1~~),
, ~ -
hj

t
11-\
L
If0k...
f\Rb
~D ~ ’\ ~
GI-t~I\J~t:
~l
I
\\1\;b1) t
U
,j
~

y,\
~ v P
TH\:::~~
~ - .
",
.
-
\-)~
C.l1f\S~
~~
’OG
9 . -
\

~’
~\:s; CF-- A
~ i ’ - , ~
\

l
\1-jQ~l+I;;;

. -
I-<.I\P~
u VN
\\

1
\\t\CX
: 1 -\
’,
t\C;K 0/\

=.
Ll.ov~1~
) 1
r
l.l ~ \ ’ J
\~
1’0 CJ l
D
\ .
’\

’ -
SH\!\ R.
> - t ~
:
8 \:)
c , R . \ -
\~
’J\
\

iEIJG
H0ki

DG T
V\iS
\.\o\J
Q,cx)D
: ~
i
{hJ\NL, ’ST~f T4’\:RE

~r ~6\J~ ~ ~P..ILL-~, -,":J\J~ lJ~-Sr-PN~- \\\:ARI

\
, \ , - \ ’ L S
.Ci~ H’-\~
.
! u b,
.<<;<’~-I>..’ .

~
I
- CjC6D
Sr J< \\~ ’fJ-\oV:- IDS f\ Q .~....
}.~ ~ ~~
I

l\Ov?... ~1Ck::R ’S"V~.

10) ~C O{)~ IF lj
~~ f’ ~, Pllk.’STO
d
11\IS

~ ~~,(\O~
A
:
"*:3R,~A3;:;
~ffi"
~.... J\<J)
r

\jI’\(K.PSrf’
Hd.KtfrS
\

o::s Ii \1’{( y ()V FCJ<:JK,DJ ’\01j .\\~

’A4< DO "\a1J():) I’\C)t~li i’:",I)",)
’<~-\ ~ ’1c>\..)\lJj QU .
.
Ii ’1001(

~ ’: .~
’i~S
AP-- ~
..

\ G
o :Des ’-\OV~"T\;) ~R.\~dJt:s.
\.\’
A ~
G. H vMAi’-\::X
Do , I

AU~
~:5 l,\fi\~,
N0\

! " f
)
- -:s~ I~ t< w~ t\~,"",i\’t\
i-\
fi. "’i~s,
IA
r S\~ ~aJ \.-S.J~ \J\""’f\1\
IT
IQ
if)
i0
IS
\

~~ ~ ~U~\~~-+’\K r~l. .I:0N

IS
IT LS
00 "\oU
S
IT
13
\i~RLD ’SPIKIT
\~()I~S
~ ;

! 0
! G\
!A ’A,\;j
00
’bS
Fh.-\b ’\ DO
\\ ’fS~)\.F1S titJ\k, l.(O\,. _ .-Sr
 ~~~~tS
’i’i
:1,,,;.
\
0e@ I 4
’,>!

D\Ff~~~U~r-.~(~’1~/
.....

-J-\’ CJ-I ~~, ~.c-J)~~

.

9- ~
\"~’TA~
.
(J}j IS
AI C) m\b1Ct 1
I ’"’. _. ....
l
ij:)~ f=~1
): .,
MI
~
t:PQL 1?f;t~3

-A..~:si3~../~"-\.
f\.,00 }W(~4
\DietS
\.)<tJt}ErM l1D01,
.

..
....Q;..W4N~~~
.)4t~..~
.~
~..~~, ,~.
.’."
Qt~, : S.2. S
f\
’ -~\ Q V t\~ ’~~I
_ ~U~R:~~
~\tR.-P~\ ~ .
...... .
,

."

~.
.\:)N
,kt}’\\. I .,
,\.)y\,*L.,po~V~U\SCtu;.
~
",’,
"Ql
A’,V\TJ-\\~’;f\~G~ ..~R.{ll’RLK~c)IJ\

.
9
!f\ "i
..,.~J ,)~\H ’ \,\ 0
Dc>

c,., +
~.~~
~~~x;o.~;’-\.o ’S~"~ t:}L

\
’I

,~ .
",

...
t\f.
,., ..
’.

,/

PW\~ O’f<5
~"
TEi

H-j-’"lBf\’T"5 (f1~f\~~L.t~.’.
....,..~.~....~
’. fJ. .,1’5 ~.A\0.",1\:$~.........,. .
.....
’ ,/ ’.’

/: "1\\ir,Ji~TD-\~K"\’~\L
I,: , .’-PvR. U~J . ~;/\ R~.mJJ’.t~
.QJ~6 ~~\.StP f. .\ W. .j, ~’: . .’

~. ~ .
k.

1
/’
\.Mfu-
Qf.t1tJ!(:’\IfM~
~~.. 1:}L-.MAr . 5 . f : : k . f 1 \
DC).

t l J . \ \)~ P\i\\
.’ . ..
.
:
.....

C:g-/
< . \ ( l J Q . C.d\Mb ~/
fllJvlY\~i~.
:/.1’\’-\ ’~l\NO]lJ~;::;J.{l’&
CS
’rfUJf .... ’.’ ’.

’~*- ~s~~f’1;;..3~~C~,~OU~
L{
~I, ~HJr.
t~ ~~Q-)’- \6V \ t-t\J,~~’d:.).
INPtRld\
"\.A)~
’

i f
JJ: . .,i

~~.
" ..

’~. ..
i1
\..Mo", At
,

~j ~t)o"
q \.)\1\- ) 1’J...\f\r \J ro
JN~lL,fC;12~
.

~~
I

IQ \. .A.\ \
Y:t
i\i
Ii! 1’\~i’V’S.
IT ,\.J\1I1t’ 0\bS At"’ 1’t:Bf\\ .
,

~AT1-t\\I:S4,\..H:WQ~v~~ot\j;:
(9.i\\1 ~)
.~c~~ \~L )..:d<LD . HC .

Q’~J.
E\i
\,Jf\ R
HPPP"\
(}j;s ip. T" ’k, SO\lNi) RID v LO’:..\S
~o IC
I
&
I:
,r ’

~ ~ ~ ~~ . .~o"’"-A~ep.~. ~o .
~"
<1i>~. ~"
,
-1 ’
/
~; .-

’ - \ f:\ tiP~ $.
D~
Is. l\
t.}~ 0JR. _HctE.. ~(jKt\ ct:
’DC) ’(ov ~OlJJ Wi{ ’-tOl)
DQ
’1’ ’10\1
ki.oW~~. lo:::J
H8
Th4t\kl4.()O
elf K\\()~
oU;
I’IE
I{ U
<() ’)
,
I

~ ~ 6- CA~ -s’- \(1) G..0~.

L rS 1\ l
AL.11
(}l r
B/(E
W~R~’~ ’0}\l\J~ <;DD1,A~1 rH-/tJR I M c;d0 k"’I
.

WftT \C)c
A~S
T4~4 p~ Da
IlJE.\..j
~Oj)
!,.)EAR. ~(<..llJ
l\O ffi

~ou S L : G :
tJ
- P f KrH l\"

.
. ’.

WU,b :S
..~\JB’"
~
(J\)

t’S"E- -K ~ QR.~ ~
Ai ’
THI~k f\PI:. DC)
KIJLk:..T~ 4 u C(d) 1

~C
~\~~
...q>...IIJI{’A
\\!.
..~.D .~l.\.
Po,
\
V 111 p.\ k ’\~U R~t1::TJ.E
J
ItA\Je:.~
.’
~<roq
t\ _
ex:::;
H

;~ Br~C)
e,~
.1

~ \~,
~
G::iWR rvO\{) .~"t;
’kOl) k/\\J~ \,tou
.
\TIj~WJ;.\c; .~.. ’..

~J~~~Yl~ r~ ~ .
.’~F\c
.._~ ~~.~ I~ k . .\\Id.~ t(~~ ~f 1~Iq-O
()~\

~~~~
’.\’
l)
l.{oJ
.
’.

..’R::1:J.......

..:~,~ ’j=\J~i"~~y
........
......~... TK cr.tJ)0R eDM
.\
I

\"5.rr~Vs~ ~oUf>R~~IRJ:TJ<;60)
...

~(Tf:~...
/

l.\~f
~-
.
.~AflD.:B
~::s ,,\W..W::QUZk.\’\OV IiAV’ T4~TSCf t{~ (
\ Dt>
..
~J:::IM.
~U~t~OUf1RESF/LL
. \
.

~~~
....~ 01--.JN
H~ ~ Do
.

;--~ .lJ\-IA-r:
......-....+
~Q_..LnQI\ ~
, ""~C05be’\i

’~~ ~ N-r \\.()\j

.. ..

~Ll~i\’ .A
. ..... .
""l’ ’. ’m.’. ..’ .

. ~ - ----

.m~~ \.~ ...

.....~ Hf
~rA- ..

.J
~W:.13
Irk\\’\K T J . \ B
~~\ v;l~\. -tr{O ~I-t
..~S......~I.\.O
lAl~.",\ 1 - 1
\\ U

: - - n : t
KIM..

l
hJ F\

f~l \ k .0&",(1)-
l.
’tou
ci=’ L\.\jlj .~u,.
IS
’ - t ~ kAO,v
, ~’’fi~1
;r

"
’.

Hq ,
- n ; : . ~
.e:f
CM, I

ti!.,
.

J$t:(+W’Sf-k. <; .v ’-~O

\3\\\\0\1)
I Th) .~\,\ov
\ I 0 /)
fit. fOlL9\j

0
~tAR’:)
K fM K
V AAf~ ~ 4f.
\
N,
A D \
 Q),

fi! ~D \r.iV~,~
~~
G{~ c,cd’> l\.()~ fc.~E-
’ ~ A
W[n.1. l.. :4D0Tf-frl. \l<. . a’fJ’~’
Do
i

~~
: WJ,f’- \ \. .)\ \.\..01.\ \\"k.~i2; ~~.’(\ ’) ~.
C) 4

~" ~ "-:r~\~K-\A~T ik’S,~~M~tJllOU~

’_ If ,;
.’. . .’

,~J cJ\~~
c.A~ ’-\O\} \%t-\B’t\~~ \J)~ \,s,
- I-{
.
.’
\\IC) h klt’i ..’
, "

q W()Ls2>~ "0V C{ D.. .

~
",I

....1\V\ \taP
b V fH~...,t TAlk I _.
10’; ~’>}’ S
.

\ ’" :’.’
t-
f1.
~\:}0 Ai>~

;~1~ ~ ~ ~ !~ ~ ~
’.

.....~;\JG
0’A~
’d."
.1:=\J~.<’-\~
(:\
1-3. ~L"
......-~f,;"i;t1~A~~~.......c.~.
.1 . \ .
~~ ~’" ’..

"
HCi.,~.
()
J"Vl~l [ rLt/Nb(
u:;)~.,J"\.. .f:...o
N\:JT,:’
.fir’
\

4
’~!. ’,.

.~Lw ~’I..-+J’$eTQif\ .’

"~~i\~~’~<1J~-
.... .... .

..~Rb
u

CR ’1C::Ajf

- _ : - ; . ~
.... u. ’.

... ...Ql:Sl\R\~S ... ’.. ......

.
’.
I.

’-~j...\\J L;Q~:~Ud~=rfQ~~~..;..u":"~~; ~~~c-- .

.,..
. n._.....

....
.

..Jt
.

-::T
"’i...:.!... ,..):tE~_Ld1bL__
....
~fU\~\t"Q~dJ,~
.)U@:.,~\\~~$06.\~..-~)
i~:J.:S~\IlOOt..
,
.

"".........~~ .:~~’.~;~~~f;.~~b~tt~;f~~.J1ld;t~~LI./~tj._...._..____
...~~.Q.l.91-:’rl)..~~~~.E~...\tb~’~’::~~.
.n..___C.~ni
’. .

- -’
..... e.._<_

--_’ ._’_....__,,_._...___L, ----- ,,--._,-

~
..........
~b.
\$..~Q:Jh,B\VC)IJ~T~.EL .~.f.@J\,Il.l(,~b1l...
.......I.).~t?
....1.),).O\-!...=tHE.~
_m.~__.~~____________.___’___ ..’.,~’__ ~,~ ___,_________.,.,~_~_ ____ _.,___L~{____L,_____~~_..______.____ _ .___,__ ’- ’"__

l
i:KtV.~."’W.\\()Il-
f...)yt<:)(~ ’1 vRE’-I’\\I~\JR\ ~PSoN .~<wl .. . .. ..:.. ......... ..

.
I
I
I An American early warning satellite stationed over the Atlantic Ocean detected a
light in the sky and gave its warning to the American Defence Computer. The
Computer gave a ’War Alert’; the light was assumed to be a hostile missile.
I All American Forces were alerted to this missile threat. A few days later it
was announced by the Americans that there had been no missile; a fault had
I developed in the computer, a wrong tape accidentally inserted into the system.

I In May of 1980 the satellite again detected an object, or intense light on

two separate occasions, it as before told the computer, the system again as

I before gave a misslie war alert to the American Defence Network.

It was then announced the computer was faulty and had been replaced.

I I am however of the opinion that this computer did operate efficiently.

There was great deiiberation at this time as to what may have caused the alert.
I It could have resulted from, it was said, a Nuclear explosion somewhere in the
South African Ocean, did South Africa at this time have a ’bomb’ capability.

I Several sateilites have in the past been allegedly ’blinded’. Britain’s Skynet

I 2 and an American satellite called SDS were hit by Laser type beams. The beams
were thought to have emanated from Soviet Central Asia.

I The Defence Ministry has denied that there was any evidence of
interference with the skynet; a military communications satellite which orbits the
I 22,300 miles above the equator. The skynet and SDS satellites are still working
so if they were hit it was presumably with low powered lasers that did no

I damage. However the American sateilite ’Early Warning’ was blinded for a time;
but it has still not been established that the Russians were the perpetrators.

I Are the Russians responsible for the ’blinding’ of the satellites or could the
actuai cause be something more sinister.
I One coincidence remains, all of the noted events of 1979/80 that occurred in and
around Central Scotland that is; the arrivai of Fireballs, the sighting and
I reporting of UFO, an attack on a member of the public by an alleged Alien
aggressor, also Earth Tremors reported by members of the public and detected by

I the Institute of Geological Science in Edinburgh.

I
I
I
I
I The glow from this Fireball made it appear fairly large and as it came closer to
my location the angle of descent altered to almost vertical.
It was only in view for a few seconds but I determined the outline or shape as
I ’teardrop’, round at the fore or leading edge and tapering to a stream of
yellow/orange fire trail. The front edge appeared white hot and was shaped like
I an arc, very similar to an upturned umbrella which formed the teardrop as I
assume the air flow was forced outwards.

I It was at this point I noticed an Object in the void or space created by the

I umbrella. This smaller object appeared to be almost round and have a silver
exterior as it reflected the intense light from the leading form.
I have no doubt that I was actually observing two separate objects, before both
I fell out of view behind a horizon of low lying hills towards the south.
In conclusion I suspect the first or leading object was a form of Air Deflector, or
I spoiier, moving the air out and away from whatever was following.

I Aerial phenomenon does not appear to arrive at random but follows a set
programme. Objects observed and detected come to ground in the hours just

I previous to the New Moon Phase.

I formulated a programme of arrival times. It was based on previous findings and
allowed 96 hours during the new moon phase for an appearance, but actually
I found that objects being observed at this time arrived on the night previous to
this target ti me.

I In 1996 I predicted a ’target time’, and area, giving an approximate date of

I 23rd September. In 1996 an ’abduction in Fife’ (iater documented in detail) is

claimed by the witnesses involved to have taken place on the 24th of

I September; the alleged incident taking place only one mile from the predicted
target site that I had specified.
This object would have followed a designated flight path that covers the areas of
I sightings and UFO activity that has been observed and investigated by the local
Police Forces.
I ************

I
I
I
I
I
I
I The bright green iridescent object fell
out of the sky to earth in the South
West.
The glow from the Fireball made it
I appear fairly large and as it came
closer to my location the angle of
descent changed to almost vertical. It

I was only in view for a few seconds

but I determined the shape as
teardrop.

I Round at the fore or leading edge and

tapering to a stream of yellow/orange
firetrail.
The front edge appeared white hot
I and shaped like an arc, very similar
to an upturned umbrella which formed
the teardrop as I assume the airflow

I was forced outwards.

The smaller Object in the wake or
tail, seemed almost round and have a
si Iver exterior.
I In conclusion I suspect the first or
leading object to be a form of spoiler,
or air deflector. Moving the airflow

I out and away from the following

object.
The approximate angle of Magnetic

I meridian in Central Scotland is 69

degrees.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I UFO over Scotland Courier and Advertiser September 1979
A spectacular unidentified flying object seen crossing Scotland early yesterday

I morning was sighted by people from Inverness, Strathclyde and Fife.

A Courior reporter wifdfowfing on the river Tay also saw the startling

I phenomenon.
It was exactly 07:19 when a large cone of iridescent green fight, trailing fiery red
passed from North to South.
I "I tracked it for nearly three seconds. It was moving at terrific speed, quite
silently, and came from open sky into cloud, through the layer, and then into

I thicker cloud before disappearing".

"Judging from its height no aeroplane could possibly have been so large or move at

I such a phenomenal pace. From its time of sighting to its disappearance it travelled
at least 15 miles".
RAF Leuchars also confirmed they had two other sightings. Each description was
I similar, particularly in respect of the green cone.
A viation experts said last night thBt the UFO was probably a meteorite or similar
I object.
A RAF spokesman said, "We have heard various descriptions it could be meteorite
I or fireball, but a meteorite is the likeliest explanation.
************

I The Courior reporters account of this object sighting does seem very similar to
what I have personally observed, particularly in respect of the iridescent green
I colour and speed, while there are differences in the direction of travel, and time
of arrival.
I However it could be noted that while he had determined a Cone as the basic
shape, I had no doubt that the object appeared to me as a round bail of light.

I This could suggest although we probably saw similar aerial phenomenon, it was
obviously observed from a different angle of view. This could place the place the

I altitude of the object very near to the Earth’s surface and not 200 miles away as
is often specuiated by our Astronomical and Defence experts.

I I had read with minor interest the news articles printed from time, to time,
of peoples claims of sighting what we could term Unknown Aerial Phenomenon.
I As no evidence existed that would enable me to extend credulity to these stories,
the possibiiity of some untoward or sinister activity taking place was not

I
I
I
I
,...I.
tJi~ OF
’IES .
BOB

THE WOOD
TAYLOR
I yesterday
shawed off his
drawing of a
spacecraft.
,

I And told of the

I
I
strange creatures
he,encountered.
It" !tappened,
accordmg to
West Lothian.
NOISE
on
lonely Deer niU,
BO~l
The 61-year-old
forest!}’ worker spoke
of ahen aggression
after he spotted the
BYBOB 8y JIM DA VIS
legs sticking out, rolled
towards me and tried to
ripped and the craft
and the creatures gone.
His boas Malcolm
Drummond, head of
Livingston Develo~-
craft and creatures in a take me into the craft.
I clearing in the woods.
Bob. of
Broomie knowe Drive,
4
Deans, Livingston. said:
Ii
The craft was round,
.. ment Corporation s ,:
Forestr)/ Department,
There" was no Doise said: "If anyone else
except for the sound at had told
the two balls rolling,
Bob said there was an
me the story, 1-
would have laughed.
,

"But not Mr Taylor, He

I
’

aboul 20 to 30 feet overpowerln~

across.
u
It was a dun grey,
but seemed to change
smell, Is an adult, sensible
which made him choke. man, whom
Just before he lost
consciousness, he said:
I respect."
A police spokesman
"We afe still
_
colours. heard his dog barking.
I II
Two round things
like balls, with metal
investigating.
When he came to. he, "This man definitely
found his trousers S8w something."
8y’ ALEC MURRA Y
BOB TA YLOR
"Round objects."
EXPER1’S were
I WOODlAND HORROR yesterday
investigating
charges of alien
aggression.
I FORESTRY worker Robert Taylor
set out
-
to inspect a plantation of
trees in 1979 and was COD-
fronted by such an awesome sight
he eould hardly believe his eyes.
white. Then,two spherical
with six or more legs and objects
rolled towards spikes
him.
The spikes
attached themselves to his jeans
And sightseers
tramped up Deer
Hill, West Lothian,
I GOd..
As he came to a clearing in
Oeehmont W near the main
road to Glasgow at Livingston,
was stopped in his tracks.
be
ripping them and clragged him
towards the weird dome.
As Robert resisted be eould
smell foul, acrid fumes which soon
overwhelmed him and be eol-
to see marks said
to be left by the
getaway space-
ship:
I In front of him, he says, a 30ft
high, dome-shaped object pulsated
from dull grey to translucent
"\\’hen J came roundgrass.
lapsed on to the damp

.~..
there was

... draggedRobert.
nothing there," says
object bad gone_
"The ,
The close
encounter of’,. the
we ird ’"’kirrd wa
repo!’ted by foreman
s-’
~
myself up and

I half.crawled. half-stag.
gered.to my vehicle."
forester Bob Taylor,
50,

= %~Jto~e’h::
Robert tried to radio in He staggered more
but could not speak.
When he eventually man-
than a m e home on
Friday to 4
::~’!
I
t
Broomieknowe Drive,
in an accident. Livingston Station,
West Lothian. ’

Holes ORDEAL
Later. Robert returned to
I the scene with his boss.
Malcolm Drummond, and
they noticed track-like
marks and holes 3in deep,
which suggested a heavy
And he said he was
grabbed by two
creatures who tried to
drag him into a craft
shaped like a spinning

I I
i
object had rested there.
A police report said: "The
marks indicated that an
-
object of several tons had
stood there but there
was nothing to show it had
top,
He" was"So -shocked. a,
doctor ordered him to
Dearbl Bangour
Hosplta ,

I I
I
I been driven or towed
away." Last night his boss

~ ..
I The official report bv Liv. Malcolm Drummond’
I "’" ingston CID concl ded: said: He had certainly
been through an

I l,:~,~f,),.’,
"Mr Taylor is a respected
and his. trousersordeal
I !
’~’~"!~
member of the community
and is described as a con-
scientious and trustworthy
person who is nol likely to
invent a story."
Several people reported
tom." were
"Whatever caused the
indentations on the
ground must have

I ATTACK: Robert had his jeans ripped

seeing a dull. white. round
oj;)ject in the skies above
the forest around that time.
weighed a ton,"
Stuart Campbell
UFO investigations
ordinator lor the
British UFO Research
co~
Association. said: U I
’take the" repo’rt
I
I
I Early in December 1979 I had endeavoured to formulate a provisional programme
of possible future aerial phenomena sightings.
This programme was based on arrival times, or the alleged incidents which had
I been reported earlier that year. These incidents included the ’fireball’ of
September, and the Deer Hiil, Livingston incident, of November in the Lothian
I Region.
The appearance times were almost the same, being on or around the New Moon

I phase, but seemingly on a two month cycle. I therefore estimated that the next
object to invade the airspace of the central Scottish region, would be sighted on

I this moon phase when it occurred in January of 1980.

************

I However, on the 10th of January, in the early hours of the morning I

received a surprise mysterious visitor. It is because of his ’uniform,’ or dress,
I that I will refer to the visitor as of ’male’ gender.
The ’visitor’, I have estimated only stayed for a few minutes. There was no

I apparent form of communication, but I suspect this appearance was intended in

some way to herald the activities that were soon to take place in the central Fife

I region.
An account of this incident is later included in this document, it is referred to or
is termed, the ’Faceless Warrior’.
I ************

I I personally missed the arrival of the Fireball a few weeks later on January
the 14th 1980, but it was observed on its flight trajectory across Central Fife

I and described by witnesses as a burning object, which dropped pieces off, and
was traiiing biack smoke.

I It was only by ’accident’, and being personally involved with other events that
took place on this day that I was able to witness the Police cars, Fire Engines,
and Ambulances heading off towards the north and central Fife.
I The emergency services had been alerted to what at this time was deemed
I a major incident, and all available units ordered to converge on the small town
of Ladybank. This location is to the north of the Falkland Hill, and the ’Eden’

I Plain!.
It was believed at this time that a burning aircraft had fallen to earth.

I
I
I Pos.. E.

I !Mystery.fireball
I Courior and

I over Fife
A mystery "ball of fire" sighted over Fife at teatime last night led to dozens of reports
.
Advertiser.
Jan. 15 / 1980.

I pouring into ’R.A.F. Leuchars suggesting that an aircraft had exploded in the air.
Some observers, however~
thought the "orange ball" had been a U.F.O.
speculated that it had been a meteorite.
.
while others

I . The majority of the

Ladybankand
. h
sightings came from the
Cupar area but there were reports of
.

slg t i ngs f rom as f ar apart as Dundee, Largo,

going on at seven although some
were drifting away.
"The light in the. sky only
Jasted for about five seconds
The air rt confirmed that
none of their planes was in the
Ladybank area at the time of the
reported. "crash."

I Glenrothes, Arbroath and Carnoustie.

A spokesman at R.A.F. "The Nimrod was released
Leuchars said, "Nearly aU the when cloud cover prevented it
but it’ was. really a weird
~xperience’"
"Low and Cast"
Fife police also received
emergency calls.

I
reports we received spoke or a from being effective’"
white trail of smoke such as you
would normally see from: an The helicopter was also even-
alrcratt. which turned black and tually rC’Callcd.
Mrs Grace McKay, 24 Gram-
pian Gardens, Arbroath, re. t;tD.....~~...H
" "... "
ctI ctI 0 0 t’Dc+
finally exploded.
.,Some said there was a . ball of "Disappeared".
ported seeinR a ball’ of fire
travelling "very low and fast"
~p.. 1~-", . . ..11>.......:~s 0"’[
13
".::>...13
\1> 0 \1>

-:I a. .~ .. . ~
in the sky just before 5 p.m. p
m 0 e

I . fire and othets spoke of a bright She called her husband Q)

t::>".....""...0... CD

~.~. .~ ~.Q)~.I-.,’..
light. Clark Wotherspoon,a 22.year. . through to see the object and I \1> m
old
"The report we attached most Ladybank, labourer of 8 Victoria Street, they watched it until it vanished n ([)
was .driving OQl~
credence to came from a person from work when he sawhome as suddenly as it appeared. <
the ::r
t; fer.....".::>"’"
~. (’t-,(Dc+ro
in Ladybank who said he had explosion in _the sky near Glen- Both agreed it was travelling
seen Ii bright flash in the sky burnie.

I followed by a bang. ’"

..A Nimrod aircraft from Clark,do"and a lot of shooting," said
too fast for an aircraft.
Fife Fire Brigade reported
m.
g:
::> \1> ".r:::.....
.. .. \11>.. .I’>. .. .t’. "
have good eyesight. that two appliances plus. an c+ to
01 III
R.A.F. Kinloss was under the "Up in the sky to my left I saw emergency and a foam tender
had been sent to Ladybank after
m
Po
Q) (() 01
<m 13
<<< \1>
control of Leuchars at 5 p.m., what looked like the lights - or a.
I the time the reports started to plane.
come in, and it was diverted to
carry out a search. "Suddenly a big orange’ball
the alert was received at 5.26
p.n:t.
The appliances were from
CD

am ::r
C
c+
~C+..CIJ "
[II> c+
.. . . .
<<:
::>.,
.. . ..
appeared in the sky and then .

I
"Nimrods are Ihnited to an disappeared as if it had gone
altitude of not less than 2000 behind a cloud.
feet over habited areas. and this
Glenrothes and Auchtermuchty,
the emergency tender from
GJenrothes and the foam tender.
from Dunfermline. I ~ p.....,~c+"1W
~m::T
c+ \1> ’"
......0([1::5.
e;:J"o..p.
c+
c+~1-’- p. \1>\1>C+’< CD (

I
hindeN:d the search.
Fire
"’Weird"
"But there were no clouds to
"The Nimrod reported seeing be seen and it really was a
my~tery.
Flares
At the time the reports were ~::>"-I-’.~r+-I-"I’\)
0:"
t’D fIJ 0
me
me
>\1>

p..’4 ~
I-’:J .....}-’HII>
::rom’ON::r<

~...~.
being received by R.A.F.
outside Ladybank. ..
a Cire on the ground near a farm complete
At first ] thought it was a Leuchars. Tayside police said c fIJ
::5
=’’<0’’&c+
I
"The rescue _helicopter Crom U.F.O. but when] got home the
Leuchars was scrambled butthe centre of Ladybank was soon
rirc turned out to be no more swarminR with police. firemen
Ihan a burning rnrm Up.
..
and ambulances and somebody
said that there had becn a plane
A sector search of the area crash.
they had a caller who reported
what were thought to be white
flares over the Tay.
No source for the narcs could
be found. . ~"
~g’\1><\1>"m
. . . . . . p. ~I;p.’~.
P. g:c+~ 1:1 . . ""
\1> c+

ro c+ t’D
\1> \1>

::sc+
. .,.c+o:...,~
between Ladybank and Cupar Riverside Airport said they
was then begun by the "That was about five o’clock lOO had investigated the flares f<ro"1- 00

I helicopter. and the police activity was still but could not account Cor them.

p.
o::r::5""

I
May 29th / 1987.
I SPACE WATCHERS
Two ’observatories costing mil.

I lions of
built
shire
so
at
pounds are
Buchlyvie,
and Leuc:hars in
G\asgow
be
to
Fife-
Stirling.
scien-
University
tists can study black hoJes in
space and stars breaking up.

I) /

A N;mrod s;milar to the one used ;n yesterday’s search.

I
 ~,
7 / /)
The lettered circles denote areas of South West and East Central
Scotland, where the public and Police Officers have reported the
sighting of unknown aerial objects.
The Police Forces, and RAF, have also been involved in the
investigation of this aerial phenomenon.

~
/

I
I
I
I I
E
B Dundee area
Central Fife
Falkirk and Bonnybridge

I J
D
H
Livingston area
Moffat area
Dumfrles area

I
I
I
I I was not to hear anything more on the matter, the spokesman at the
Royal Observatory had obviously been correct; there was no intimation of any

I kind from the Ministry of Defence.

The situation was to change however in the late 1980s when I had the
opportunity to join an engineering company with access to the Ministry of
I Defence Establishments in Scotland.
************

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I An unexplained ’earth tremor’ detected on the 17th of November 1987 caused
some confusion among the Scientists involved in the investigation which
prompted the following response on the 15th of January 1988.
I Earth Tremor Explained
I An Earth tremor that affected the south-west counties of Scotland shortly
before Christmas was almost certainiy caused by a meteor creating a sonic boom

I high in the atmosphere, according to Education Minister Robert Jackson.

In a Parliamentary written answer he said scientists had ruled out an earthquake

I or a seismic shock under the sea, and believed the tremor on November the 17th
was caused by a meteor travelling a supersonic speed through the upper
atmosphere. Reports of a Fireball in the sky above Ross-Shire tended to confirm
I the theory.
************

I Fireballs have allegediy been observed on several occasions flying in the vicinity

I where an earth tremor has previously been reported or detected.

A spokesperson for the British Geological Survey has made it clear that he does

I not believe in the speculated earth tremor ’light’ phenomenon, but ’tremors’ may
be the result of Meteors moving rapidly through the air.
The arrival of the ’object’ may be intended to coincide with this imminent
I activity, be it a meteor shower, or pressure release in the Earth’s crust. This may
in some way be convenientiy masking tremors which are a created as a direct
I result of the objects activities.
The ’object’ may land in a designated position and carry out some

I ciandestine operation or activity, before moving to a known earth tremor location

to make its departure possibly some days later!.
************
I
I
I
I
I
I
 ~,
7 / /)
The earthquake which took place on the 26th December 1979 had an
estimated Richter scale value of 4:5 and an epicentre near Gretna
Green.
The epicentre is just outside my estimated ’corridor’ where police
officers of severai counties and numerous witnesses have reported the

~
sighting of unexplained aerial phenomena.

~.:"",

1
I
I
I
I
I Earth tremors "Masking" covert activities?

I
I Mild readjustment of the earth’s crust, said the Scientists, was the cause of
the tremors through out central Scotland on December 26th 1979.

I The earthquake had a vaiue of an estimated 4:5 on the Richter scale, large for a
British event, and its epicentre at Gretna Green, oniy a few miles from
Lockerbie, and Dumfries.
I The epicentre is just out of the ’Aerial activity corridor’ where police officers,
and twenty other witnesses were later to report the sighting of a UFO.

I The earth tremors were also felt throughout central Scotiand. In the known

I ’Highland fault’ area of Doune, the ’Lie’ of the River Tay, and Lothian Borders
Region on the south side of the River Forth.
The tremors were also felt at ’obscure’ locations, which in iater years would give
I rise to Scientific speculation that the tremors may be ’airborne.’
They could have resulted, it would be said, from sonic boom created by high
I speed aircraft somewhere over the North Sea. The tremors may have also been
caused by adverse weather conditions, or Meteorites passing through the earth’s

I atmosphere.
Whatever the reason for the tremors, considerable unknown aerial activity took

I place over central Scotland at this time.

The earth tremor was also recorded one month after the UFO incident in
I Lothian Borders Region.
I am tempted to specuiate that the imminent ground movement in central
I Scotland is ’known’, and can be detected by a superior technology. It is then
consequently effectively utilized by some unknown adversary to cover ’tremor’

I effects which they themselves would accidentaily, or intentionally instigate!

************

I
I
I
I
I
I A combination of sonic boom and high pressure resulting in still
air and peculiar local conditions is now thought to have been
responsible for the "earth tremor" which hit Tayport a week ago.
I -’1", Residents of the area experi~
Cnun,., ""d d...(’r1lu.r. enced a rattling and shaking of
their homes at approximately
7.02 p.m. on the night of June 1
that seismic. at Eskdalemuir
Evidence to support their ’Sonic event.
picked
.
event was atmospheric rather event at Tayport, t h e equIpment’
up a,
I

I U’..dnr.dny. Jun~ and some described the effects belief has come from the
9. 19R2. as, "alarming."
A spokesman at the seismolo.
meteorological station at Esk- gy unit said yesterday, "As
dalemuir which has equipment Eskdalemuir is some 100
Scientists at the Global Seis. ror measuring differences in k ilometres from Tayport. a
rnology Unit in Edinburgh are atmospheric pressure. rough caJculation gives us a

I now almost cenain that the

----- Some five minutes after the speed of one third of a kilometre
,
per second.
"This is exactly the speed we
would expect for a sonic event

I Seismic shock sounds a mystery

while a seismic event travels at
about
Small blip
lG-times
that speed.

. "We have picked up a small

I Tbe tremors tbat sbook coastal

areas of Fife and the
Lothians on Tuesday were
By DAVID APPLETON

which showed a possible tre-.

The seismographk equipment But sonic booms could travel a
long distance over water,
mol’ registering 0.9 on the and it was possible that
blip on our recording cq\1I)’-
ment. but quarry blasting in the
area can and does produce a
larger trace than the bHp we
have.
I probably caused by a sonic
boom. investigators said yes.
terday -. but the cause of
the boom remains a mystery.
Richter scale would also pick some foreign aircraft in the
up a sonic boom, Close ana- Nortb Sea bad been tbe
lysis re\’ealed that an
pheric sonic event was
atmos.- ~!r
ca use.
Russell Eberst. of tbe
"This leads me to the view
that it was an at.mospheric,
sonic event caused by an air.
craft.
almost certainly the cause. Ro\-’al
Obser.’atory in Edin-
I Tbe Britisb Geological Survey,
in Edinburgh. wbich oei.
ginaIJy said that tbe most
likelv cause of the tremor
altbougb the RAF bad said burgh, said t~at
sonic booms
that it did not ha\’e any could be caused by tbe entry
aircraft flying supersonically of satellites or meteors to
:.Althougb I have not per.
inally experienced such an[.
rent, witness reports have
)Qken of the ground shaking. i

I
was .an underwater explosion
in Kirkcaldy Bay. wbere two
Royal ~avyships were exer.
in the area at that time,
But an analysis of the
ter tape of readings at dif.
mas-
the atmosphere. Several
large meteors did enter the
eartb’s atmosphere every
"In the conditions an aircraft
.
uite far out to sea,well beyond

I
.
cising, has rewexamined its
seismic records and con-
eluded that the boom was
almost certainly airborne.
~Ir David Redmayne, of the
survey’s seismology depart-
fereDt locations bad sbown
that the event was of
pheric origin. Tbis was
-atmos-
revealed bv the fact that the
soeed of s und in air is much
lo~er than through water or
day, and on average about
500 old satellites
the atmosphere each year.
Debris the size of a cricket
ball eculd cause a sonic
boom which would be aud-
re-entered
.he set limits. can produce a
onic boom which wil1 travel
wards the land carrying quite
lot or nergy-sufficient
cause quite powerful effects.
"It bas become almost pos-
to.
’ock. ible over a wide area. sible to predict wbe we will
ment, said in:tiaI records had have such effects. as the right

I suggested that there had

been some kind of tremor.
conditions come together.
"There have been similar
reports from Kirriemuir and the
Forth Brea during periods of
still weather in the last few

I Exptifsffilt~ shakes Fife weeks.or

I The N3\’Y last nigh! dedled

being responsible for two earth
But Mr Dlwid nC’dmain, of
tbc_ survc)"s sC’h;:mn1or:.Y
I tremors that sbook pArt of

Fife )’t"StcrdA)’ afternoon,
A !<ipokcsman at’tbe British
Geological Survey in Edin.
burgh. said tbe tremors were
I probably cau!;C’d hy a con.
trolled underwater e"plosion In
Kirkcald)’ ay where two
naval ships were on exercise.
I But a NR\’Y sf"Okcsman. COD.
ffrmin~ that detonation of an
abti-mme dc\’icc was !’che-
dnlcd, said: "If It did lake
b~ WR~
pl {"e it not at 1.20 Hod.
E~thst1emor
d(’partment said the tremo~,
which r(’gi:"tercd 0.9 OD the
Ricbtcr !’calc and were fdt
from Kin~born to Crail, were
mO’St likel}’ aUrlhut.IJhle tQ a
naval explosion.
"It was DQt an lmo<;phf’rk
!’Ionic (’vent And we don’t think explained
It WA!’ an c rihquokc. Th(’
cbaracter of the seismo~r~m
nnd tbe location !mS::R(’~t thM it
was a naval explosion in Kirk. AN EARTH tremor that affected soutb.west Scot.
land shortly before Christmas was almost cen.ainly
cHldy Bay," be add(’d,

I would nothin/t like the ~calc

people art lalklnF; shout."
lie added tbat tbe rumhle
CO:l~!guards s:lid tb,:,~’ had
rcport~
~(’a
of ;my (’XpJOSill[l~ fit
<lnd jf,ought it must h:Jve
DO
caused by a meteor creating a sonic boom high in the
atmosphere, according to Education Minister Robert
Jackson.
In’a parliamentary written answer he said scientists
was beard h)’ ODC ship but lIot
~o .air- had ruled out an c.a.rthquake or a seismic shock under
w~s
I the other,

.’We’ did not ha\’c 3DY. dh’crs

b(’(’n a
craft.
Fife
ic boom fmm
Police who
rc(’(’in’d phone {’ails about
a Iso
tbe sea, and believed thc,tremor on NO’YCtn.bcr 17
caused by a meteor travelling at SUpersODlC speed In
tbe upper atmosphere. Reports or a fireball in the sky
abo\’e Ross-shire tended to confirm the theory, be
clearinR uncxplodt’d dcvjc("s tr{’-mor,. lhe
said th(’-rc wcr~ no

I aDd I ba\’(’ no indication that

this ncideDt had nn)"thinr::; to
do wilb us at all:’ tht:’ ~pokcs.
maD Added.
rC’ports or any dnm:\~e and 1"e
(:aus(’ ""liS n I11Y$h.’T)’.
added.

I
I
I UFO Checked by MOD
I
I Seismic shocks, or earth tremors whether caused by movement of the earth’s
surface, or airborne, as a result of meteors passing through the atmosphere, or

I aircraft fiying at supersonic speed, can be scientifically detected and examined.

Equipment used by the Seismology department of The British Geological Survey
can pinpoint a source, or epicentre accurately. However, there are instances
I where the actual cause of the tremor, or seismic shock remains a mystery.

I I have noted over the years that tremors are often detected in the vicinity
where the sighting of a UFO has been previously reported. There are particular

I instances where a tremor is detected but there has been no object sighting. It
can be months later, after the initial tremor, that mysterious light phenomenon

I may appear in the vicinity of the epicentre.

The following incident took place over Kirkcaldy Bay, in Fife, the scene, and
I location of the previous earth tremors recorded and reported in 1985 and 1988.
At that time it was debated if the tremors were actuaily underwater detonations

I instigated by the two ships of the Royal Navy, or even a foreign aircraft flying at
supersonic speed somewhere over the North Sea.

I Fife Free Press November 1 st 1996

I Three local teenagers have become the latest witnesses to testify to lights
in the sky above Kirkcaidy.
The trio spotted the incredible objects over the river Forth after ieaving a
I nightclub and watched them until dawn.
The following morning one of them contacted RAF Leuchars to report the

I sighting, and ask if airmen could shed any light on it.

He also called the Ministry of Defence and now he has revealed the department

I took his story seriously and taped his statement.

The exited 18-year-old, who studied the two objects through binoculars, told the

I press: They were so ciear it was incredible. Three of us saw them as clear as day
through the binoculars and it was something quite out of the ordinary".
Describing one of the objects as boomerang-shaped, he claimed the brightly
I coloured spectral bodies appeared to be made up with dazzling lights and seemed
to have colour flowing through them.

I One object remained stationary but the second repeatedly left it’s position
return to the same spot later on.
o~ly
to

I
I
I "This was no plane, no helicopter, no Comet or anything like that", said the

I youth, who asked not to be named for fear of redicule.

"There is no doubt in my mind as to what it was. I know it sounds absurd but it

I was absolutely unbelievable.

"The three of us witnessed it over the weekend, and it would be interesting to

I find out if other people out there saw it too".

"I told the Ministry of Defence everything and it didn’t seem to surprise them at
all. It was a lenghty conversation".
I A spokesman at the MOD confirmed that a report of a sighting had been
received from a member of the public in the Kirkcaldy area.

I "It would be looked into but there appeared to be nothing in it which could
suggest a security risk, which is the only interest we have", he continued.

I "The purpose of the Ministry of Defence is to protect the security of the country.
The only interest we have is to establish that any object reported to us does not

I appear to represent an invasion of our air space by a hostile party. Once we have
established that does not appear to be the case, which is the way it has always
come out every single time, we lose interest".
I The above incident was first reported by the witnesses on the night of 18th/19th

I of October 1996, but not published in the press until the first of November.
Several earth tremors had taken place in the weeks prior to this Incident on the

I outskirts of Edinburgh, and I suspected the sightlngs of UFO in Kirkcaldy district

may have been Earth Quake light phenomenon.

I After contacting the British Geological Institute in Edinburgh, a spokesman

informed me that he did not think this was possible as he did not believe in the
light phenomenon.
I The lights, or Objects seen from Kirkcaldy on the 18th/19th of October he
suggested to be UFO.

I On November the 8th other residents of Kirkcaldy came forward and would
appear to support and give credence to the previous story.

I Pensioner Supports Youth’s Story

More local people have come foreward to back up a Kirkcaldy teenager’s
I tale of bright lights in the skies above the town.
The youth’s encounter was investigated by the Ministry of Defence after he
I reported studying the two strange bright objects, including one shaped like a
boomerang, through binoculars.

I No sooner had the Fife Free Press revealed details of the sighting than a local
pensioner declared: "I’ve seen it too".

I
I
I She confirmed she had seen a boomerang-shaped configuration of lights in the

I sky during the early hours of the morning.

A second woman contacted the press to say she had also spotted a fast moving

I object while driving towards the town.

"It was a really bright light and I thought it strange to see it so clearly on a

I cloudy night like that", she said, "The lights dimmed down and it moved to the
left then moved off to the right and disappeared under the ciouds. At first I
thought it was a helicopter, but what really got me was the speed it moved from
I one way to another. When it moved it was a light Blue or Violet colour and from
a distance iooked oval-shaped".

I The claims of the witnesses were just the latest in a string of sightings

I above Kirkcaldy that year and although experts believe that most such reports
have a logical explanation, a tiny percentage remain a mystery.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ;YA’"
I l1T’EMO’S.’
PLANE
CAUSEIJ
I
I
I
.
MASSIVE.
coast
. .,
were_"ca.used by IeCr’et
to e Scota - air bue:.
o..
earth tr whICh’: roc1
1&. WIll,’delm

and not an eBfthquake _ or : meteor shower. .

.~.
Their IIndlngs heve been
,...
~lIlIIlIIlIIllIIlIlIill1~
’"
up b)’
faat-movIn& contact which tlaaheel IIClO8I air
_~~__
the DuIclJ
plane on its .....
Jut
ScleQUsta probinl’ 1ut month’., incident believe

control acreena in Prest.

..’
. m,bt.WBY. I
ENWlUClE
.
the. mOlt likely explana~
sonic boom from a hUdt..peed pl was to blame- ,.-~tlon tor th1a incidenL
’~ere have been
.
of porta In n>ecla1Iat
thet the Americana heve

u.s. de-
Mach3-plua BOY plane..
_nt
in developmenL~r-.
. Mr HaaIt IBid Amari-’
. .

pope..
’
I
re-

I ~~ CHANNEL fnTI/’:2 fence

,"u.s:hed< toward. aecret
;: 110’" . off Eaal-:2
bourne, -Susscz
;: cl1me ff’Om
:2 wo.k displaJ/.
-’

-.
l
ehlef.,.heve

Eii Machrthanllh" Oft; the

;: 11M found IheJ/;: Kintyre peninsula. ’.
" ft,...:2
;:
HeIn Haak, head, of
_01011)’
at the .Royal
can .tatt at. the
E Stena _ _ Londonef’ E up to" eight- b ~, dol!"’ Machrlhanlah baae hed
developina__
th-.neW refused to conftrin or
pJane.. at. remote deny, h1a IUlpidOna.

I E
. .
.

:;111111111111111111 EIimJ= Netherlailda MeteoroIC:aI

1nstI.tute. said: "A IUper-
80nie militarY. pJane Ia

I
I FLYING SAUCER
I
I
’ISSafPEANE’
A STRING of nying saucer Sightin. was last night
blamed on a space age nghter plane.,
doesn’t
Police
exist. that officially -."
from Shetland to sOuth west Scotland have noises,
.
probably sonic
I .,. NIALL FRAIER
I
a . high- booms." _ "UFO"
I been
speed
deJuged with callers who ALL spotted
white light -
flashing across the sky: The lat
But US defence expert BW Sweetman claims it’s sighting was over Shet~
st
not a UFO invasion....... but the Yanks testing their land last weekend.
top secret spy jet Aurora. He is’ convinced test Police chief inspector
flights have been carried Farquar MacGregor told
I I. out from the US Air how he and 17 others
Force,~ base at remote saw "8 very bright light
I
Machrihanish, Argyll."... in the sky."
I
. The Americans: deny
.------- -. ----.

~
the. S.300mpb Aurora

I even exists but experts

claim it was used in the
Gulf War.
Sweetman sa : ’’’There
has been a radar sighting
of something very fast,

I and locals talk of strange

7- 93,
I
I RIDDLI OF ’SPYJIT’
A TOP-secret spy plane.is believed to have
crashed near Stonehenge, sparking a - the
close paralJels to the film in order to hide
evidence of a crash which killed

I cover-up uncannily like the plot of the hit

film Defence of the Realm.
The 1985 thriller starred Greta Scacchi, -
ArneMcan pilots and wrecked a prototype
plane codenamed Black Manta. Distress
calls were logged on air-band radios at
two

;~7
Gabriel Byrne and Denholm Elliott in a midnight on September 26 in the area of

qk Cq;~
story about journalists probing a mysteri- Boscombe Down, Wilts.

I ~ n 5 P i
ous plane crash at a secret air base in East
Anglia. Now a group of plane spotters are
claiming that the BMtish and US govem-
le
Next day there were road blocks around
the top-secret base. But the British Gov.
ernment and the Pentagon have dismISsed
the claims as ~rubbish".

I (~~).
I
I Area B Dundee

I
I Two Lunar months after the Fireball incident in Central Fife, the aerial activity
reported in Central Scotland was now appearing to follow a pattern or cycle.

I The first arrivals in Central Scotland was heralded with the Fireball of
September 1979, followed by the Deerhill incident, at Livingston. This was to the
south of Fife in November of 1979.
I January 1980 brought the Fireball, and UFO, encounter investigated by the RAF
in the region of the Lomond Hills in Central Fife.

I Now it was possibiy the turn of an area to the North Fife to receive a visit.
The following incident Involving several Police officers took place in Tayside

I region.

I The Courior and Advertiser Monday March 31st 1980

A full scale was carried out in the rural area to the west of Dundee early
yesterday morning after one of the most credible and dramatic UFO sightings ever
I made in the district.
The sighting was made by an off duty Police Officer from the Tayside Police, and
I two milk boys in the Menziehil1 area.
Another police officer heard unexplained noises about the same time while two

I other officers in a Panda car confirmed the sighting over the Menzihi11 area.

The officer was asleep in his home in the Gowrie Park housing estate when he
I and his wife were wakened about 4:45 am by a "hollow metallic hum" which grew
increasingly louder.
I From his bedroom window, facing north-west, he saw four "glows" moving slowly
in a diamond formation.

I All the time the noises grew louder and changed in pitch. After several minutes one
of the lights detached itself from the formation and slowly alighted in the vicinity

I of the hamlet Benvie, between the Perth road and Muirhead.

The first police officer on the scene said he also heard similar noises after he

I was sent to the scene investigate his colleagues report.

Last night the off duty policeman told the "Courior" what he had heard and
I seen, and admitted during the 30 minutes he had witnessed the sighting, he was
somewhat alarmed by what had happened.

I "[ came off duty at llpm and went home to bed after my shift", he said.
"We went to bed about lam, [ am a light sleeper and we left the bedroom window

I
I
I open to get some fresh air. The window faces the Carse of Gowrie.
I "1 looked at my watch when 1 was wakened and the time was 4:55am".
"What had roused us was a strange noise similar to the amplified sound of a child’s

I spinning top. It was a sort of hollow, metal sound- quite loud".

"There was different types of sound throughout the half hour. It could be

I described as something slowing down and then accelerating at various levels, first a
high then a low pitch. 1 got to the window a few seconds after first
hearing the noises. 1 know all the normal noises around the house but these were
I totally different- they quite alarmed me. What 1 actually saw were four dull lights.
There was a full, or almost full Moon and it looked as though the light was
I reflecting off four objects. They were a dull glow and looked like metallic objects
reflecting the light of the Moon. They were about three quarters of a mile away, to

I the north west, moving slowly in a diamond shape. They appeared to stop at one
point and hover over the Star Inn Road, near Benvie".
"At this point the noise died down a bit and for a moment 1 thought 1 was
I imagining things, so 1 went back to bed and 10 and behold 1 heard the noise getting
louder"
I "1 went to the window again, looked out and saw one of the lights moving slowly
down to ground level. It descended like a lift- there was no shape just a glow".
I "At ground level it just disappeared, but there were noises from where it came
down. For a time the noise seemed to intensify".

I "One of the officers first on the scene told me he, too, had heard noises when he
arrived. When 1 looked for the other three lights they had disappeared".

I A spokesman for RAF Leuchars confirmed that there was no air traffic in
the area at the time.
I A full police search of the area proved negative.
The two milk boys who were interviewed by police said they had heard noises

I similar to those described by the off duty police officer.

An anonymous caller also phoned police headquarters in Dundee and reported

I hearing a "buzzing-cum-whooshing" noise in the Menziehill area at the same

time.
************
I This was not to be the end of the matter however, and exactly two years
I later in the month of March 1982, Dundee received another visit by unknown
aerial phenomenon to the same location as before.

I
I
I
I Courior and Advertiser Wednesday June 9th 1982
I Sonic boom may have caused "earth tremor"

I A combination of somc boom and high pressure resulting in still air and
peculiar local conditions is now thought to have been responsible for the "earth

I tremor" which hit tayport a week ago.

Residents of the area experienced a rattling and shaking of their homes at
approximately 7:02pm on the night of June 1st and some described the effects as,
I "alarming",

I Scientists at the Global Seismology Unit in Edinburgh are now almost certain
that the event was atmospheric rather than seismic.

I Evidence to support their belief has come from the meteorological station at
Eskdalemuir which has equipment for measuring differences in atmospheric

I pressure.
Some five minutes after the event at Tayport, the equipment at Eskdalemuir picked
up a sonic event.
I A spokesman at the Seismology unit said, "As Eskdalemuir is some hundred
I miles from Tayport, a rough calculation gives us a speed of one third of a
kilometre per second"

I "This is exactly the speed we would expect for a sonic event, while a seismic event
travels at about lO-times that speed ".
"We have picked up a small blip on our recording equipment, but quarry blasting
I in the area cand and does produce a larger trace than the blip we have".
"This leads me to the view that it was an atmospheric, sonic event caused by an
I aircraft ".
"Although I have not personnaly experienced such an event, witness reports have

I spoken of the ground shaking. In the conditions of an aircraft far out to sea, well
beyond the set limits, can produce a sonic boom which will travel towards the land

I carrying quite a lot of energy- sufficient to cause quite powerful effects"

"It has become almost possible to predict when we will have such effects, as the
right effects come together. There have been similar reports from Kirriemuir and
I the Forth area during periods of still weather in the last few weeks".
************
I
I
I
I
I Arrival Prediction

I
I On September the 20th 1995, the appearance in the sky of familiar phenomenon
prompted me to hurriedly forward a target site, and possible times for the

I imminent sighting of aerial objects, to RAF Leuchars. They would no doubt be in

the forefront of any activities, if there was to be Involvement with a mysterious
object’s intrusion into Scotland’s airspace.
I I had spoken with a Flight Lieutenant on a previous occasion, and he
appreciated the existence of some form of unknown aerial phenomenon which

I had been discussed with his colleagues. The questions he forwarded for my
opinion were, "What do we do in an encounter situation? ,- we have not been

I briefed by our Superiors?,-could they be possibly hostile?,-should we open

fire? ",

I I replied, "There was no way of being certain of the intent of a mysterious party.
However, over the past years there had been several alleged assaults on
members of the public, sightings by the Military at American Air force bases. At
I no time had this party intimated its intentions, nor has it volunteered any form of
recognizable communication".

I "In conclusion I suspected that any hostile Intention of the party, would only be
determined on the day of encounter"!.

I The Flight Lieutenant replied, "Yes, but then it’s too late".

I The Fireball activity had resumed on the 25th of August 1995 with the
incident reported near Turnhouse, as in the likeness of a burning plane falling to
earth.
I There was, however, a lull until January 14th 1996 when a giant fireball
said to be the size of a large house, fell into fields near Newliston, West Lothian.

I The object split in two, but Police who scoured the area could find no trace of it.
On Thursday the 28th of March 1996 a large fireball was seen to fall below a

I horizon of low lying hills at Glenrothes, in central Fife.

I The sighting of the objects in the months of September, January, and

March had been noted in the past as the arrival times. If an object did appeared
in November then it had obviously been unobserved.
I Three fireballs had been noted to come to earth in the region of Fife. I expected
at any time, a member of the public to report the sighting of some mysterious

I aerial object.

I
I
I It is unfortunate that the witnesses involved in this alleged incident near

I Falkland in central Fife, did not notify the local Police, but chose to contact a
’hotline’ to a magazine.

I I have no doubt officers from the Fife force would have been at the scene in
minutes, and if required, with the assistance of the Royal Air Force.

I There is no way of knowing what the witnesses saw, or encountered, except

I expected an Object to make an appearance in that area, at that time.

I One of the UFO investigators giving an account in a newspaper article, said

that despite extensive enquiries, ’with his years of experience investigating

I paranormal claims’- says he found no evidence of a rationai explanation for this

supposed incident. But he was persuaded not only that these witnesses were

I telling the truth, but the events they perceived actually took place.
"I wouidn’t be surprised", he said, "If people find this story hard to believe; in

I some respects I found it hard to believe myself".

"But your readers can be assured that, as someone who has dealt with this
subject, I’m convince of the sincerity of these witnesses.
I I would like to have talked with the witnesses, but keen to protect the
I people who were traumatised and fearful of ridicule, the investigator refused to
divulge anything which could lead to their identities being uncovered.

I A press reporter concluded; The anonymous witnesses interviewed by the

investigator can’t be quizzed on their experience.

I I July 1999, the alleged encounter once again made the press as it
proclaimed, ’Expert concedes Fife incident might have been a hoax’.
The UFOlogist who first revealed details of the eerie close encounter said to have
I been endured by a group of terrified Fifer’s now says the whole thing may have
been made up!

I The witnesses who wanted to remain annonymous in order to be saved from

ridicule; their identities to be concealed from their friends, and colleagues; do

I not wish to come forward. They have chosen not to have anything more to do
with their case; does this make it a hoax?

I The witnesses may be regretting their involvement with certain parties and
may now have preferred, to have approached an established Authority.
I can only suggest to people wishing to report an alleged encounter, to follow the
I advice forwarded to me by NASA. It was in response to my enquiry concerning
the United States Government and Unidentified Flying Objects.

I "Persons wishing to report UFO sightings are advised to contact law enforcement
agencies".

I
I
I ’Beacon’ Earth Surface Navigation

I The fireball’s final descent to earth in central Fife I have estimated at between

I 65 and 70 degrees. This angle is very close to the magnetic meridian.

In close proximity to the ground the fireball breaks up into several pieces, and

I the craft which was in a pursuit position depioys to another area in the vicinity.
The descent from the upper atmosphere, to finally disappearing behind a horizon
of hillside at ground level, is rapid; does the object then turn into horizontal
I flight only fractions of a second before impacting the ground?
I have read oniy part of a document, ’Top Secret for Majic Eyes only’.
I This documentation released under the terms of the American freedom of
information act is claimed to have been prepared on the 18th of November 1952

I as a preliminary briefing for President-Elect Eisenhower. This report alleges that

on the 6th of December 1950 an object impacted the earth at high speed.
This incident is said to have taken place on the EI- Indio Guerro area of the
I Texas-Mexican border after the ’craft’ followed a long trajectory through the
atmosphere.
I By the time a search team arrived, what remained of the object was almost
totally incinerated, but what material could be recovered was transported to an

I AEC facility at Sandia, New Mexico.

I This was however following the discovery of another impacted object on

the 7th of July 1947, which had been reported by a farmer in a remote region of

I New Mexico, the location approximately seventy five miles north west of
Rosewell Army Air Base. A secret operation was then instigated to retrieve the
wreckage for scientific study.
I During this activity aerial reconnaissance discovered that four small human- iike
beings had apparently ejected from the craft before it exploded. The bodies had

I evidently fallen to earth about two miles east of the crash site.
All four occupants were dead, and badly decomposed due to the action of

I predators, and exposure to the elements over the period of time it took to find
the remains.

I A special scientific team took the bodies away for study, and the wreckage of
the craft removed to several different locations.
Civilians and military witnesses were debriefed, while press reporters were given
I a cover story that the object had been a misguided weather research bailoon.
What actually happened in the desert region of New Mexico is a mystery. It

I will probably never be solved because there are so many counter tales of events.
The United States Government and Unidentified Flying Object information leaflet

I
I
I However, to make a hurried successful landing in this position wouid no doubt
I require a most sophisticated control, and manoeuvrability, well beyond the
present technical capabilities.

I Referring to the United States Government and Unidentified Flying Objects, it

states (2) there was no evidence submitted to, or discovered by the Air Force

I that sightings categorized as "unidentified" represented technologicai

developments or principles beyond the range of scientific knowledge.

I Out with this alleged landing site there are large, open ground areas, more
suitable for the purpose of contacting the earth safely!

I Just off this main road there are several sports venues, a Rugger field, Bowling
greens, Tennis courts and cricket pitch, out of sight and relatively secluded at

I 5:15 on a November morning, for what might be an intended covert operation.

I Was there an awesome technology present in Todmorden that morning. A

craft that knows, or can determine the terrain, and then manoeuvre its contour
’exactiy’. Piace itself in the middle of a roadway, the occupants of the craft
I having the intention of carrying out a medical examination on a Police Officer
they know, will approach, in a matter of minutes.

I They also know their mission will be successful. The officer propped his clipboard
on the windscreen, and carefully sketched the object. Did they also know he

I wouldn’t radio for assistance?

The mission we assume was compieted and they left the scene. But were they

I aware that they had been observed by four other police officers, and a School
Caretaker.

I The deployment of this alleged object was indeed efficient, was it possibly
using some form of ground beacon to target itself? A form of sophisticated

I gound implant that may have been dormant for countless years? Was this device
somewhere In the region of the cow field? Did the object initially land in the

I fieid of cows before manoeuvring to straddle the A646 roadway. The animals
would probably stampede. As farmers will no doubt agree, cows are very capable

I of jumping fences when they so desire.

************

I Could there possibly have been successful deployment of objects in the years
following the alleged UFO ground impacts in the Mexican desert in 1947 and

I 1950? One of the most spectacular of all "light in the sky" phenomenon allegediy
took place over the city formerly known as Tananarvie, now Malagasy, capital of

I
I
I
I Central Fife the Target Area

I
I Many changes have taken place over the years in the central belt of Scotland.
What used to be forest land is now townships, or cities, with motorways,
railways, and housing estates.
I Secluded areas that may have been used in the past for a visitors clandestine
activities are now heavily populated.

I This may be one of the reasons why many peoples are now claiming to witness,
and are reporting a phenomenon that a few years ago would probably have gone

I unnoticed!

I Over a period of several years it is clai med that al most two thousand
people in the central Scottish towns of Bonnybridge and Falkirk have reported
sightings and some even claim inexplicable experiences involving unidentified
I flying objects. Information gleaned from my visits to this area tempts me to
agree that there is an aerial phenomena mysteriously presenting itseif on very

I rare occasions, but not in the quantity of number alleged by the local population.
Only on one occasion In my visits did I witness an object that was not readily

I recognized as normal air traffic.

I Research into the 1979/80 activities would effectively place the towns of
Bonnybridge and Falkirk out of any established target zone.
In November 1979 a group of three UFO were observed by roadworkers at
I Auchmuir Bridge, a smail village near the town of Leslie in Central Fife.
The objects were seen to pass overhead, then turn and head off in the westerly

I direction towards Stirling.

This UFO presence near Stirling may have been confirmed one month later in

I December 1979 by the reporting and detection of an Earth Tremor near Dollar.
This particular tremor caused considerable damage to the underground workings
pit.
I of Dollar

The area of Dollar and the surrounding countryside would I assume be the
I nearest UFO position to Bonnybridge and Falklrk. However If we accept that the
claimed UFO sightings in the towns are genuine, then this object phenomenon

I may not be intentional but accidental, and could have been caused as a direct
consequence of ground excavations being carried out over many years in Central

I
I
I There is also some evidence that Timber and Stone Circles, whether built within

I Henges or not, may have had some function associated with simple astronomical
observations. Perhaps to do with the timing of rituals at different seasons of the

I year.

I Balfarg is said not to be alone as a major religious and burial complex of

the Neolithic and Bronze Age. Tayside in Particular, just across the river Tay from
the North East coast of Fife, has other such sites.
I In Forteviot a number of small Henges and burial mounds lie, in and around, a
huge enclosure bounded by large posts.

I At Huntingtower which is just to the west of Perth, there are a number of Henges
and a huge burial mound.

I It would seem at this time that none of these sites have been excavated to
any extent, however the excavations at Balfarg in Fife would appear to have
yielded a considerable amount of information on the type of structures used for
I the purpose of religion, ritual and burial by the people living in this part of Fife
from before 4000BC to after 2000BC and it wouid seem that we are still at the
I earliest stages of understanding what may have been done, and why, at these
Prehistoric Monument Sites.

I It is agreed by scholars, that probably sometime after 2000BC seems to be the

end of an era in this area for the use of these sites for ritual and burial activity.

I There is some evidence that in later ’times’, religious activities In the

British Isles no longer took place in this type of large structure but were
conducted and concentrated in and around natural features of the land, such as
I wooded groves and fresh water ponds.

I It has already been noted, that the way Henges were used Is not clearly
understood. It has been suggested that they were used for large scale communal

I ceremonies but there Is also some evidence that the Timber and Stone Circles
whether built within the Henges or not, may have had some function associated

I with simple astronomical observations perhaps to do with the timing of rituals, or

seasons of the year.

I If we travel eastward through the Kingdom of Fife, along the coast at

Lundin Links we find two standing stones 4:3 metres high just of the road, also to
I the north of these stones is a smaller stone about 100 metres away.
From these stones the Bass Rock can be seen at almost 20 kilometres in the

I south east. The Moon rising near this southerly position will just graze the summit
of the rock. The stones could thus have been used in the Bronze Age as a

I
I
I primitive form of Lunar observatory.

I It was when examining a burial cist at Balbirnie Stone Circle part of the
Balfarg Henge complex that I photographed a section of a small cist internment

I area where one of the stones of the low kerb forming the sides, had been carved
or decorated with Cup and Ring markings.

I At the Clava Cairns, a group of three chambered cairns near Inverness,

there is also two single stones with the familiar cup and ring depressions. While
I these are not so well defined as at Balbirnie stone circle in Fife, there is
obviously an Importance associated in their construction and emplacement.

I Balfarg Henge, and the Clava Cairns are both early Bronze Age sites of

I considerable size covering quite a large area, but at each site there is found only
one, or two relatively small marked stones.
The placement of the stones may also be significant, they would appear to not
I have been installed in prominent positions, but are intended for concealment.
At Clava Cairns the markings are to be found on a stone at the rear of the north
I east cairn, in this position they are at the opposite side from the Cairn entrance
and the Headstone and not readily found. They are engraved on the face of a

I base, or lower wall stone and not to be readily removed. In a short period of time
they would probably become overgrown with grass making them obscured from

I vision.
At Balbirnie stone circle the markings are on the Cist Kerb stone, as part of an
internment they were at ground level and would probably followed the same fate
I as the Cup and Ring markings at the Clava Cairns.

I Stone markings of this type are found frequently at prehistoric sites in

Scotland but scholars admit for what purpose the marks were made Is still

I unknown.
I wouid like to suggest that the stones may have been carved in secret and

I placed unobtrusively in their position.

Earl Bronze Age Man, although lacking in technology was probably very clever.
Examining the original layout of Balfarg Henge and comparing it to the stone
I markings he may have created for us a stone map, or plan of the Henge site.
The stone carvings at the Clava Cairns may also contain this site plan
I information but in this instance the stone may have been carved after placement.

I
I
I
I Location of the Balfarg Henge, in Fife, Central Scotland

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,,,"’,,,,^, . ’:~:i"’""".,"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I While noting the location of the Baifarg Henge and its associated
prehistoric monuments, it is also interesting to note how in very close

I proximity they are to the ’Eden’ plain towards the north.

Also the Fireball, UFO, and earth tremor incidents reported in this area
November/December 1979 and January/February 1980.

I
I
I
I LeQends of Central Fife

I There are many legends associated with the history of Scotland. One story in

I particular concerns the West Lomond Hill in Central Fife. This hill is slightly
higher, and about 2 miles to the west of the Falkland Hill which almost shadows
the Balfarg Henge,
I Carlin Maggie was, it is said, a local powerful Witch who wanted to be even more
powerful. In order to accomplish her aims she climbed the West Lomond Hill in an

I attempt to call on, and seek a pact with the Devil.

The Devil came to the hill, but instead of forming a pact with Carlin Maggie, he

I turned her into a pillar of stone, which we are informed can be seen to this day!

I There is also a legend concerning the flat plane at the north of the
Falkland Hill. The river which runs from the catchment area at the base of the
hills is called the river ’Eden’. It is said that the river flowed out of the
I Eden Garden.

I It Is esti mated that Scotland was made open for colonisation in or around
the 9th Millennium BC when the ice covering of the Pleistocene period finally

I retreated. The first and earliest inhabitants would seem to have arrived about
6000BC in the County of Fife.

I These Mesolithic people were Nomadic Hunters and Fishers, therefore

unfortunately have left very few obvious traces. The large sea shell heaps on the
coast of Argyll, and the Firth of Forth, with the dense concentrations of flints as
I at Dryburgh are the clearest obvious traces, but large numbers of the shells and
flints do not necessarily indicate a great number of people. It has also been

I estimated that there were perhaps only about fifty of these Nomadic peoples
living in Central Scotland at this time.

I If we are to accept the findings of the scientists, the natural environment,

I particularly the levels of the oceans changed during this Mesolithic, and the
later periods. Raised beaches and dry sea beds can be clearly seen in places like
the Mull of Kintyre and the Forth Valley.
I The climate is suggested to have altered several times and it should always be
remembered that six thousand years ago the lower part of Scotland was covered

I with dense forests. These have, and stiil are being removed by man and nature
to be replaced by the peat bogs of bare moorland which are a striking feature of

I
I
I the country at this time especially in the north, and on the islands off the

I northern coast of mainland Scotland towards the Arctic Circle.

I Sometime between 6000BC and 4000BC Fife Bronze Age Man discovered, or
may have been instructed in the art of Agriculture. This instruction may have

I come from the Europeans who could have settled in Fife.

I now look to another circumstance that may explain Bronze Age Man’s
I education, although scholars wiil condemn this as a far fetched possibiiity.
Was a small group of peoples in the Central Fife area visited at this time by an

I advanced aerial technology. If this were to be the case, over the centuries this
personage would probably have been worshipped as Gods and would therefore

I have instigated the buiiding of the Henge type Monuments.

If we imagine several visits being made to this primitive people, and each time
to a designated target site, then the purpose of the Lunar observatories may not
I only have been to determine the seasons, but to also prepare the peoples for the
month and the day when this aerial phenomenon would make its next
I appearance.
With each appearance, or possible landing at the target site did someone make a

I record of this Form or Objects relative ground position on a stone, and then
secretly place the single stone in the Henge complex.

I I assume if this were to be the case Bronze Age Man may have witnessed
something beyond his understanding and he thought it necessary to make a form
of record intending to keep this information for someone else to find?
I If visits by a superior intellectual to Central Fife were to continue over a
I long period of time it may have been beneficial to establish a function or facility
at the position where the Balfarg Henge now stands, to aid navigation and site

I location.
Balfarg Henge had remained virtually untouched for thousands of years until the

I 1980s, after this ti me and over a wide area the site was completely excavated
and largely built over.

I Recently the towns of Bonnybridge and Falkirk have reported aerial

phenomena, but this may be ’lost’ phenomena. Has a function or facility that had
I remained, and had been used for countless years at the Balfarg Henge no longer
available.

I Could this Object Aerial activity that I expect to continue for the foreseeable
future be intent on re-establishing or re-Iocating a navigation facility.

I
I
I The Balfarg Henge ’Housi~.Development’
I
I
I
I
I
I STONE I
(ORIGI
Oposm
LE
’L,.

I STONE CIRCLE
(NEWPOSmoNJ
I ..,:0
I tIW.’!!11!.N’
, PARK
,,
I ,,
...
I .I’
I

I ...~01oG\tM
j\RC"""",
’f1V\.
I
I
I
I The above Henge layout designed by the Graphics Section of Development
and Planning, Fife Regional Council, Fife House, Glenrothes, shows in detail
the considerable housing construction which has, and is stili taking place in

I the immediate vicinity of this prehistoric site.

I
I
I The US Air Force and NASA have had intermittent, independent investigations of

I the possibiiity of Alien Life on other planets; however none of these has produced
factuai evidence that life exists on other planets, nor that UFOs are related to

I Aiiens. From 1947 to 1969, the Air Force investigated UFOs; then in 1977, NASA
was asked to examine the possibility of resuming UFO investigations. After

I studying all the facts available, it was determined that nothing could be gained
by further investigation, since there was an absence of tangible evidence.
In October 1992, NASA was directed by Congress to begin a detailed search for
I artificial radio signals from other civilizations under the NASA Towards Other
Planet Systems/High Resolution Microwave Survey programme (also known as the

I Search For Extraterrestriai Intelligence project). Congress directed NASA to end

this project in October 1993, citing pressures on the US Federal Budget. The

I HRMS did not detect any confirmed signal before it was stopped. However,
similar work will continue in a more limited manner through the efforts of private

I groups and through academic institutions.

ext.2 During several space missions, NASA Astronauts have reports phenomena
not immediately explainable; however, in every instance NASA determined that
I the observations could not be termed "abnormal" in the space environment.
The 1947 to 1969 USAF investigations studied UFOs under Project Blue Book. The

I Project Headquarters at Wright Patterson Air Force base, Ohio, was terminated
December 17, 1969. Of the total 12,618 sightings reported to Project Blue Book,

I 701 remain "unidentified".

The decision to discontinue UFO investigations was based on an evaluation

I of a report prepared by the University of Colorado entitled, "Scientific Study of

Unidentified Flying Objects;" a review of the University of Colorado’s report by
the National Academy of Sciences; previous UFO studies; and the Air Force
I experience investigating UFO reports during the 1940s, 50, and 60. As a result of
experience, investigations, and studies since 1948, the conclusion of Project Blue

I Book were; (1) no UFO reported, investigated, and evaluated by the Air Force
was ever a threat to our nationai security; (2) there was no evidence submitted

I to, or discovered by, the Air Force that sightings categorized as "unidentified"
represented technological developments or principles beyond the range of
modern scientific knowledge; categorized as "unidentified" were extraterrestrial
I vehicles.

I ext.3 Since the termination of Project Blue Book, nothing has occurred that
would support a resumption of UFO investigations by the USAF or NASA. Given

I the current environment of steadily decreasing defence and space budgets, it is

unlikely that the Air Force or NASA will be more involved in this type of costly

I
I
I project in the foreseeable future.

I Costs would also seem to be the concern of the Ministry of Defence.

Secretariat (Air Staff 2a) Main Building Whitehall has said; "If no threat is

I discerned, and in connection with unexplained aerial sightings this has been the
case in all instances to date, we make no further attempt to investigate and

I establish exactly what may been seen".

"We believe that rational explanations could be found for these reports- if
defence resources were diverted for this purpose, it would be an inappropriate
I use of defence resources to provide this kind of aerial defence service."
************

I A British Government Minister denied on Thursday the fourth of March 1982, that

I there was a ’cover up’ by the Ministry of Defence over the sighting of UFOs.
Defence spokesman Viscount Long told the House of Lords that over the

I last four years there had been 2250 UFO sightings reported, and all had been
passed to staff who examine them for possible defence implications.
He told the Leader of the Lords all-party UFO group, Earl Clancarty, "If you
I are suspicious that the Ministry of Defence is covering up in any way, I can
assure you there is no reason why we shouid".

I The Ministry of Defence was interested in UFOs in case they disclosed a Russian
aircraft, or an unidentified piane breaching the security systems.

I Former Chief of the Defence Staff, Lord Hill Norton, asked if it was true

I that records of all slghtings received by the ministry before 1963, had been
destroyed because they were considered to be of no interest.
"If this were true, who was It who decided they were of no interest", he
I demanded.
Lord Long said all UFO reports since 1967 had been preserved. Before that,

I they had generally been destroyed after five years.

************

I In December of 1994, the Hungarian Defence Minister in respect of UFO sightings

I being reported, has announced that an invasion was taking place in his country
but there was absolutely nothing that they could do about it.
An unknown aerial phenomena that can penetrate World Defence networks
I without fear of detection, an ’Alien’ form that would seem to have chosen to
ignore the Worlds elected established authorities, which we should assume they

I are aware exists. Invaders who are quite prepared to carry out clandestine
operations on the Earth that possibly involve actual bodiiy harm on members of

I
I
I the public. Could this activity also involve ’alleged’ abductions of the human

I race. Our mysterious adversary is apparently confident, or without fear of

’proved’ detection; and therefore secure from any possible retaliation. A situation

I that would obviously merit defence concern.

But how could a responsible authority inform the general public that there is

I absolutely nothing it can do to protect them from an undetectable threat?

Are possible Alien visitors a threat? If we assume that an unknown aerial
phenomenon may have appeared over Central Scotland, and to the Fife
I population in past centuries; the early nomadic inhabiants and Pict peoples may
have given us a possible answer recorded in stone.

I ************

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Fig. 1

I
I At the entrance to Abdie Old Churchyard is a small building which houses a

I carved symbol stone. This stone originally stood on a low hiil overlooking the
village of Lindores.
Over the years it has served several functions. Most recently It has been
I re-used as a Sundial and as an Ordnance Survey bench mark. The original use of
the stone, however, was as a Pictish symbol stone.
I The Pictish symbols are well carved and are still clearly visible. Two of the
carvings may be seen on the front face of the stone. The upper design (Fig. 1) is

I known a a triple disc symbol and is thought to represent a Cauldron.

The lower design (Fig. 2) is a crescent V Rod symbol. The V Rod Is interpreted as

I a broken arrow. A third design, interpreted as the mirror symbol, is carved on

one side of the stone.

I There are almost 200 stones incised with carvings throughout Scotland;
from Fife to the Shetlands.
I Some symbols are recognizable particularly the naturalistic wildlife, and what are
claimed familiar object such as mirrors, combs, and tongs.

I Incised symbols are almost always found two to a stone, with sometimes a comb,
and mirror added. It is speculated that this may indicate a female. The animal

I symbols are sometimes found alone, particularly around the Moray Firth.
The meaning of the carved symbols, and the erection of the stones is unknown.
At present a growing body of circumstantiai evidence suggests the symbol stones
I were gravestones.

I There are also apparently abstract designs which may have been carved as
early as 10 AD. Scholars suggest they are simplified views of other objects; thus

I it is claimed that the triple disc, or three discs and bar Is a Cauldron, but seen
from above?

I
I
I Three local teenagers In Klrkcaldy, Fife, reported ’lights’ in the skies as

I they left a night club.

One 18 year old studied the two forms through binoculars and claims to have

I seen them as clear as day, and it was something quite out of the ordinary.
He described one of the objects as ’boomerang shaped’, he also claimed the

I brightly coloured spectral bodies appeared to be made up with dazzling lights and
seemed to have colour flowi ng through them.
A ministry of Defence spokesman confirmed that a report of this sighting
I had been received from a member of the public in the Kirkcaldy area.
The spokesman stated at the time: "It would be looked into but there appeared to

I be nothing in it which could suggest a security risk, which is the only interest we
have", he continued, "The purpose of the Ministry of Defence is to protect the

I security of the country. The oniy interest we have is to establish that any object
reported to us does not appear to represent an invasion of our air space by a

I hostile party. Once we have established that does not appear to be the case,
which is the way it always comes out every single time, we lose interest.

I Is the crescent form, or ’boomerang’ a stylized representation of what may

have been observed at Kirkcaldy? If it was, could it be a defence threat?

I What is the purpose of the broken ’arrow’ or ’spear’ etched across the
’boomerang’ form.

I Is this embellishment as scholars assume, intended to represent a truce between

tribes. Or is it possible they could have been originally inscribed by the early

I peoples of Scotland, to indicate that near, or at the places where the stones are
to be found; they encountered a vastly superior hosti Ie technology against whom
their primitive weapons proved ineffective!.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Crescent or ’Boomerang’ with V Rod Symbol

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Fig. 3

I This crescent and V Rod symbol is actually the same diameter as the triple disc
and bar "cauldron" in the previous pages. I have not drawn them to scale.

I In all stone etchings of this form, there are changes in the crescent design. In
this particular instance the ’face’ on Fig. 3 would seem to portray a "Serpent!".
-_;P"d~.,oughsent
--
.
for to the tri of and
ups, near
A acros
Arnold ON
claim aliens small whole saucers inside
saucers In "flying would saucer
The against He
oc ur ed The ,some operation
and Government broadened have They ngles. modern
incdet,
Bequt, squadron
Telphone: UFO their
to
world
have and
the the
swerving Sudenly, Mountains

-
most have spheres described
saucer", become would
control ing been and menagerie have last journalist
just
withpossibly to
wil . have of Mount was June
CAULDRON a famous darkly-hinted-at take
phenomenon many
been
Wreckage
to
been
mytholg, become
"lite
the

50
coined
writing
water",
if
and
them nine he
of
01592. few even conspiracy, been them. contacted
of
a
a you busines man
in

742
of
extra-ter estrials
of people
sighted enormous
shapes, joined although green
years. world.famous term
about
named
behaving, as I
saw flying 24,
Independent days Some
’lb. 92
all
purose.
State
of
stories has .
abducted by all cornerstone skipped
"like flut ering
silvery
Washington Rainier
co- cover-
12 by
after these also even the
claim over flying from the men" flying which
the Bill enormous what his 1947,
of a it a
United
Anderso DRavi.d Research se
around
air in
sheriff
no
made was miles the
been
The nearby. crashed saucer
New Air gence story carried front
On
ing objects
in
named an
KIngdom KY63LF SoUand Fif. LesIi. Drive Craig curity-sensi
base.
turn,
in
Brazel one

could
from
material
consist

of
later
from
JB Brazel,

Foster
a found in
pos es ion

Mexico
Force
stationed

at
bombardment
of ice that
the
Roswel

page
July

8,
saucer"
Kenneth
speds. ap eared Sta e. the
private

a wreckage Daily
Roswel with a by the which of the of the Arnold’s travel ing
The contacted Roswell alerted foreman to

-
reported a sightn.
Kenneth American
base the of 1947,
identfy.
substance foil- ike
Roswel. ranch was astounding Cascade aircraft
ti

ve was area the who, the

struts
to It 75 on
Wil iam
had
desert
had
flying
in in
Roswel group 509th
intel i- Record
the the -ylf" at
be
a
strewn
thre-quartes Marcel
Major A nuclear
few
because
with Jesse the
Photograph
the
days bomber
later
of 509th
Marcel, of
a later,
weather
isued, Press A strange wing. a
substance mile testified was,
day flying
returned the at
saying or long
debris. to
bal o n staemnt. so that
to base’s
was the by saucer
after finding the time,
its and a 200
that
debris the to

300
an
site
intel igence the taken
.~gisterdat Prb1tedan The tinfoil
the came retraction release area
with
world’s
in
feet
Brazel.
silvery from of
oficer,
California
the published We kly radar
a was
the wide, about only

Post
Ofliceas
by
D;
there said In crash. saucer, crew
that grow. had in
News, he 1978,
recov d. the Rumours
reflctor.
had
C;ThOmsoD of already

a.4CWsper &
June been thought Major
had

also
killed the bodies But
the
Decmbr,

Co., a in begun
2J, of 1952.
I
I The published photographs in the previous pages are taken off an article which

I was in regular use in the Mills, and industrialized areas of Fife, and Central
Scotland.

I For a number of years initially from the 1940/45 period; this high luminosity
yield lamp unit was an important source of artificial lighting. It being eventually
replaced in the later 1950s with the then revolutionary fluorescent units.
I This luminary fitment consisted of several individual pieces formed in tin,
or other similar light gauge plate. The completed assembly being held together by
I a single bolt which passed through the centre of the column base, and each
section in turn, to engage with a nut mounted externally at the top. This nut was

I incorporated with a ring to allow the fittings suspension by a chain.

The assembly was designed to accommodate several lamps (bulbs). The

I lamps in groups of three, and possibly four as illustrated in the drawing, were
mounted horizontally into Brass, or Porcelain holders. The holders were mounted
and fixed inside the central column.
I Internal wiring was originally bare copper, usually a single core, but
covered along its entire length with numerous small porcelain beads. This method
I was at this time, an accepted as satisfactory form of electrical insulation.
Later models were insulated in Vuicanized rubber and covered with a flexible

I woven Glass or Mica sleeve to offer protection from the prolonged intense heat
which was generated by this multi/lamp unit.

I To assist in cooling the internals of the fitment, several large ventilation

holes in groups of three, were installed around the circumference at the top, with
similar holes at the base.
I It is the overall shape of the fitting and the inclusion of the numerous
I ventilation holes, reminiscent of porthole windows, which I suspect prompted the
taking of the photographs and the probable fraudulent claims of the objects

I origins.

I The reflector was so formed that the lamps when secured in position were
semi-recessed. The reflective surface being of White Stove Enamel finish.
The overall diameter across the reflector, widest part of the fitting, is estimated
I at between 20 and 24 inches (51-61) centimetres.

I This particular style of fitting may be an adaptation from an original Gas

design, where instead of filament lamps there would have been ’piping’ and

I mantl es
In the mid 1950s REVO became a subsidiary of the Philips Electrical Corporation.

I
I
I And it came to pass, when man began to multiply on the face of the Earth,

I and daughters were born unto them.

And the Sons of God saw that the daughters of men that they were fair, and

I they took them wives all of which they chose.

And the Lord said: "My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is

I flesh, yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years".

There were Giants in the Earth in those days, and also after that, when the Sons
of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the
I same became mighty men which were of old, men of reknown.

I And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the Earth, and that
every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was oniy evil continually.

I And it repenteth the Lord that he had made man on the Earth, and it grieved him
at his heart.
And the Lord said: "I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the
I Earth, both man and beast and the creeping thing, for it repenteth me that 1
have made them.
I ************

I The Gospel states that God had decided to destroy all living things on the
Earth. All it would seem except Noah and his family, and two of every kind of

I living flesh.
Could we suspect that the Sons of God and their families also perished, did they

I in someway contribute to the wickedness of man.

However, God intended to destroy man and beast and every creeping thing, but
we could speculate that there were other creatures, or creations which did
I actually survive.
In Genesis 20 God said: "Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving

I creature that have life".

And God created great Whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the

I waters brought forth abundantly.

************

I Then all whom God intended boarded the Ark; and they that went in, went in
male and female of all flesh as God had commanded, and the Lord shut them in.
I If the Lord actively shut them inside the Ark, was it therefore found necessary to
I airtight seal the enclosure. An air seal in order to maintain the integrity of the
vessel from a dangerous atmospheric environment that was known would prevail.

I
I
I Genesis continues: It rained for forty days and forty nights, and the waters

I prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth. And all the hills that were
under the whole Heaven were covered.

I Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail, and the mountains were covered.
The water prevailed 15 cubits, however it is interesting to note that the

I dimensions of the Ark are given as 300 cubits long, and 30 cubits high.
Would 15 cubits of water cover the mountains?, or did the water prevail 15
cubits from the normal sea level?, or does the text from Genesis infer that the
I water prevailed 15 cubits on the side of the Ark, impiying the Ark was possibly
half submerged.

I Noah and his family were sealed in the Ark but fairly comprehensive information
is forwarded in Genesis on the water levels that prevailed, but it was only after

I the Ark rested after the flood that Noah could remove the covering and confirm
the water had dispersed.
The mountains were covered, and the Earth was submerged for 150 days,
I after which God made a wind to pass over the Earth and the waters asswaged.
And the waters returned from of the Earth continually: and after the end of 150
I days the waters were abated.
The Ark rested on the seventeenth day of the seventh month on Mount Ararat.

I The waters continued to decrease until the tenth month, on the first day of the
month the mountains were seen. But it was at the end of forty days that Noah

I opened a window that he had made in the Ark and released the Raven which
went to and fro until the waters were dried up from of the Earth.
He also sent forth a Dove to see if the waters were abated from the face of the
I ground, but it was seven days before the Dove returned to the Ark with an 01ive
leaf, seven days later he released the Dove again, but this time it did not
I return,
Genesis ch 9v13, tells that after a year, month and a day of being enclosed in

I the Ark, Noah removed the covering of the Ark, and looked, and behold the
ground was dry!. And in the second month, on the twenty seventh day the Earth

I was dry. It would seem Noah could only confirm the water levels by removing the
covering of the Ark.
The window that he had constructed on God’s instructions, was large enough only
I to permit the deployment of the Birds.
God spake unto Noah saying, "Go for th of the Ark, thou and thy wife, and thy
I sons, and thy son’s wives with thee. Bring forth with thee every living thing that
is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and every creeping thing

I that creepeth upon the Earth; that they may breed abundantly in the Earth, and
be fruitful, and multiply upon the Earth.

I
I
I Noah’s fi rst priority was to embark on a course of action that may seem

I strange!. After being instructed by God to bring the animals forth from the Ark;
that they may breed abundantly on the Earth. He proceeded to build an Altar

I unto the Lord; and took of every ciean beast, and of every fowl, and offered
burnt offerings on the Altar.

I The Ark had been afloat for many months and no doubt in that time several
animals and fowl would have been bred on board. Instead of being angry at
Noah’s actions which could have jeopardized a critical breeding programme.
I Genesis tells us; the Lord smelled a sweet savour; and the Lord said in his heart,

I I will not curse the ground anymore for mans sake; for the imagination of a mans
heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite anymore any living thing as

I I have done. While the Earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and
heat, summer and winter, day and night shall not cease.

I God blessed Noah and his sons and said unto them; "Be fruitful and multiply, and
replenish the Earth". They were also instructed on the form of animal, fowl, fish
I and herb that could be consumed.
Finally, the promise of a covenant between God and creatures of all flesh, a

I ’Bow’ in the sky. Never again would the waters become a flood to destroy all
nostril breathing life.

I ************

Many years ago, as a youngster in Sunday School, my attention was often

I drawn to the large prints of paintings which covered the walls. The prints were
artists interpretations of prominent Biblical characters, or depicted some miracle
I or event which had taken place in the Gospels.
One painting in particular portrayed the story of Noah, and the building of the

I Ark.
It had always seemed an awesome task and accomplishment for one man to have

I built this huge, incredible, ship. A craft, without power, sails, or steerage, that
was required to float effectively without any major problems and not having the
benefit of any form of sea trials.
I But Noah had another great task to accomplish. Noah was instructed or ordered
by God, to collect or attempt to gather ’pairs’ of animals and fowl, from allover
I the Earth, they intended for preservation from the imminent catastrophic
destruction that was to follow.

I Before attempting to give an opinion, or personal interpretation of a Gospel

story I recall the threat in Revelations.

I
I
I ’For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of this prophesy of this

I book, if any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues
that are written in this book.

I And if any man shall take away from the words of this book of his prophesy, God
shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the Holy City, and

I from the things which are written in this book.

I am honestly not wishing to tempt fate, but could we however suspect that the
I writer of Genesis may have omitted details, or information which may have
indicated another scenario. Is there possibly more to the Biblical story than is

I documented in the Gospel.

I Scientists claimed to having discovered the skeleton of an alieged maritime

craft 515 feet long on Mount Ararat on the Turkish Iranian border, and have
proclaimed that it could be the remains of Noah’s Ark.
I There are other dimensions of the vessel given in Genesis which wouid make it
of immense size for a prehistory construction.
I The overall length of the Ark is determined at 300 cubits which according to the
scientists is approximately 515 feet. A measurement of exact, or very similar to

I the remains uncovered on Mount Ararat in 1994.

The breadth of the Ark, given to be 50 cubits, would be over 70 feet, and the

I height of 30 cubits approxi mately 50 feet.

This construction made from Gopher wood, is almost as large in dimension as the
Pocket Aircraft Carriers currentiy in use with the British Navy.
I The awesome task of this crafts completion, and the capturing and
I collecting of all manner of animals and birds would seem to be greatly beyond
the capability of one man, no matter how many years he was allocated to

I complete this labour.

(Genesis ch 9 vs 29. The days of Noah’s life were nine hundred and fifty years,

I then he died).
************

I
I
I
I
I
I One of Hollywood’s first major Sci-fi disaster film movies, where the very
I existence of mankind and the Earth is at stake was titled. ’When World’s Collide’.
The film tells the story of a Planet, and its moon, detected in deep space by long

I range telescopes. The celestial duo are later found to be on collision course,
however the Planet will miss on its trajectory, but its Moon will Impact the Earth.

I All over the World observatories track the approach of these immense bodies that
will no doubt destroy the Planet and all existing life.
A plan is formulated. Over the coming months, before the oncoming catastrophe
I it is decided to build a Space Ship. This craft would possibly allow the escape of
a small body of people and animals to the Planet; which they hope is able to

I support life, before its moon Impacts.

I Scientists and technicians from many countries are involved in the

development and construction of this Space ’Ark’, and as the months progress we
are given glimpses of the fast approaching, ever-Iarging objects, that are
I bringing imminent doom to the World.
The space ’ark’ nears completion, but who will be installed as crew and
I passengers? Who will be found worthy to lead the Human Race in its quest for
survival; capable of nurturing, and striving to maintain its very existence.

I After much deliberation it was decided to put place allocations in a ’hat’ and
allow the people involved with the project to ’lucky draw’ their ticket to safety.

I All does not go as planned. The places have all been allocated, but as imminent
death looms, those who have had no opportunity for salvation decide to take
over the craft by force of arms. A battle ensues, but needless to say the hero
I and his friends are eventually able to soar away to the new world.
************
I Who then built the ’Ark’, was it Noah by his own endeavour, or did he

I possibly have a team or a large group of helpers who assisted in this massive
undertaking. Part of the timber frame sections required in the construction of a

I wooden hulled seagoing vessel, in the proportions of a 515 feet long

Aircraft Carrier, would no doubt have have been immense, and weighed several
tonnes. This would no doubt require considerable available labour for its
I installation and completion before the deluge.. All of this labour, and helpers,
aware that doom for the world as they new it was approaching.
I Genesis tells us that Noah had found grace in the eyes of the Lord. Noah, his
wife, Sons and their families were chosen to embark!

I God also came in personage to ’seal’ Noah in the Ark. What could this possibly
infer?.

I
I
I Did the Ark require to be ’airtight’, the craft was pitched outside, and inside. This

I would seem to be impossible and impracticable, totally enclosed with animals on

a ’voyage’ that lasted for over a year!.
I God found it necessary to appear in person endeavouring to seal Noah and

I his people in the Ark, could this imply that they may have changed their minds,
and refused to embark!.
If indeed God found it necessary to be present at the imminent launch of this
I life preserving craft, could suggest that a problem had arisen, or was expected.
Had there been a rebellion, or an attempted armed takeover of the Ark by

I others, possibly helpers of Noah who had assisted In the construction and had
elected to fight for their place of salvation.

I Could we speculate that Noah was virtually entombed with his people and
animals for what the Bible terms one year, one month, and twenty seven days.
I Entombed, for the reason that the Ark had only one window, and that, I suspect
was so small it only purposed to allow the deployment of the Raven, and several
I days later the Dove. We can then imagine the possible existence, and conditions
for the occupants on board the Ark over the time stipulated, to be horrific.

I The Ark grounded on Mount Ararat as the flood subsided, and God told

I Noah to disembark the animals that they may breed and multiply on the Earth.
Noah’s first priority at this time was to build an ’Altar’; and then he proceeded to
sacrifice of every clean beast, and every fowl, as a burnt offering to God.
I And God we are told, smelied the sweet savour, and the Lord made a covenant
with man.
I Couid it be that Noah disembarked the Ark in which he and his people had

I been enclosed for over a year in dark imprisonment to find the Earth totally
alien. Pastures that were once lush and fertile had been changed into muddy

I swamp, and a whole population of friends, and helpers had vanished.

In an act of rage and defiance at this scene of total destruction he demonstrated
his anger by building a ’pyre’, then commenced to incinerate and destroy the life
I that God was desperate to preserve.
God ’smelled’ the burning and came to investigate what may not have been
I intended as sacrifice, but was instead an act of rebellion, and destruction. The
imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth said God in Genesis,

I Ch 8 vs 21, or does Genesis suggest that the heart of a man is defiant from his
youth.

I
I
I God found it necessary to make a covenant and he spoke unto Noah and to his
I sons with him saying,
"And I will establish my covenant with you; and with your seed after you; neither

I shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of a flood; neither shall there be
any more flood to destroy the Earth; I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be

I a token of a covenant between me and the Earth".

Noah we are told in Genesis Ch 6 vs 8 had found grace in the eyes of the
I Lord; Noah was a just man; and perfect in his generations; and Noah walked with
God. However, later after the floods had departed, and Noah and his brethren are

I the only members of the human race to have survived, God refers to them in this
manner. "And the fear of you, and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of
I the Earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the Earth,
and upon all fishes of the sea; unto your hand are they delivered.

I God had found Noah to be changed in his personality, before the flood he
had been deemed a just man and perfect in his generations; but now, after the
I event he was a person to be wary of, a man to be feared.
Was this covenant between God and Man an agreement? Had Noah shown his

I destructive capabilities by ’sacrificing’ every clean beast and every fowl that
God required to be protected; that they may breed abundantly in the Earth; and

I be fruitful and multiply upon the Earth.

Is it possible; if man would endeavour to ensure the continuity of a critical
breeding programme; and guarantee not to destroy the creatures in his care, as
I Noah may have threatened, and demonstrated. Then God would agree to leave
him and his people in peace to re-establish mankind in the Earth; on the promise
I from God that there would never again be another Divine devastation.
************

I The three Sons of Noah went forth from the Ark. They were Shem , Ham,

I and Jah-pheth; theses are the three Sons of Noah; and from them the whole
World was overspread.
Before the flood had found grace in the eyes of the Lord, and walked with God!.
I After the flood had Noah changed in personality. According to Genesis he
became a Husbandman, and planned a vineyard, drank of the wine and became a
I drunkard.
Noah was uncovered within his tent and Ham saw his fathers nakedness and told

I his two brothers Sham and Ja-pheth. They then covered their fathers nakedness
with a garment.

I
I
I The Gospel tells of Noah’s drunken condition on only this one occasion, but
I we could assume that it may have happened, or been noted several ti mes to
merit the specific mention in the Old Testament.

I Had Noah become a drunkard? or was he simply lost in despair at the

devastation he had witnessed; the living conditions he and his family had

I survived for over a year; and now this awesome task that was laid before him,
without the help of lost friends and the labour that had been destroyed.
Or was it his demotion. Noah had previously walked with ’God’; now he was a
I tiller of the soil with no more access to what may have gone before.
Noah lived for nine hundred an fifty years: and then he died.

I The generations of the sons of Noah were delegated the task of re-

I populating the land. And the generations of the families formed in their nations.
And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.

I The generations of Noah have bowed to their task but retained the knowledge of
the presence of this God form, and may have decided, if they could reach to the
heights of Heaven where this God may be found, they may themselves become
I as God’s!.
The story continues in Genesis chapter 11. As they journeyed from the

I east they found a plain in the land of Shi-nar; and they dwelt there. They them
decided to make bricks and mortar, and they said: "Go to, let us build us a city

I and a tower, whose top may reach into heaven; and let us make us a name, lest
we be scattered abroad upon the face of the earth".

I God looked down on the tower which the children of men were intently
building and he said: "Behold the people is one, they have all one language; and
I this the begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they
have imagined to do".

I "Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not
understand one another’s speech"

I The generations of the sons of Noah were then scattered: ’upon the face of all
the earth: and they left off to build the city’.

I It was after several generations had passed, that God came to confuse the
language of the people, and scatter them to other parts of the world!
I There are colossal ruins in the jungles of Guatemala and Yucatan. The Pyramid
fieid of Teotihuacan, 30 miles north of Mexico City.

I For generations the peoples of these lands also built tempies, Pyramids, and
cities. The work lasting for more than a millennium, and then it is suggested that

I
I
I an incredible thing happened. Suddenly, and for no apparent reason, a whole
I people left its laboriously and solidly built cities and moved to the barren north.
This was leaving the jungle to eat its way through buildings, breaking up the

I masonry, and turning everything into a vast landscape of ruins. And we are told
no inhabitant ever returned.

I It is said the oldest text about Teotihuacan, tells that the Gods assembled
there and took council about man, even it is claimed before homo sapiens
existed.
I When the Gods took council with the Mayas were they delegated a task, as in
the time of Noah. Were the Mayas instructed in their generations to populate the

I central Americas? Did they however elect to build a city, in an attempt to

represent a ’form’, or to copy in their stone construction, something that the

I Gods may have used, or related to. The Mayas with an intent to become as
Gods?.
Then possibly after generations, did the Gods return and see the built
I cities, massive Pyramid constructions, of which was not their intention. Was the
language then confounded, and the peoples scattered throughout the land?
I ************
Is it possible that a God form also came to central Scotland; to the areas

I of prehistoric ceremonial sites.

Were the first inhabitants in Fife delegated a task. Could these early Nomadic

I peoples have been instructed in the art of agriculture at the place of ’Eden’, just
to the north of the FalklandHill.
I The Gods may have returned to the Central Fife area after several generations,
and, as with the Mayan Temples and Pyramid constructions, also found the
Balfarg Henge.
I Was the language then confused, and the peoples scattered, consequently
leaving off the building of their vast monuments.

I Just how accurate are the text of the Gospels. In Biblical times there was

I many sightings of strange psychical events; strange flying ’discs’, alleged moving
stars. It may be unfortunate, if the account of an alleged event was written and
forwarded, by the UFO investigator of that bygone age!.
I ************

I There is one last question I will reflect on, referring back to the Ark.
Noah was instructed by God to pitch the Ark outside, and inside!. The ark was

I then completely covered, except for one small window. After one year, this
would allow the release of the Raven.

I
I
I Could this elaborate pitching have rendered the Ark ’airtight’. The ark we could
I assume was completely covered, except for one small window Installed
specifically to allow the release of the raven. This window was apparently too

I small for Noah to determine the height of the waters which only became evident
after he was able to remove the covering of the vessel.

I Could Noah in the construction of this ’ship’ have created, by Gods instruction,
some form of possible ’charcoal’ air filter?
I There was probably a large local population at the time of Noah. There
I would have been fishermen, others may also have possessed seaworthy craft.
The flood lasted for over a year, but may not have been world wide. We could

I therefore assume, that the boat people made an attempt to survive the
holocaust, this however was not to be permitted.

I After the year at sea Noah opened the small airsealed window and released the
Raven. The Raven then flew backwards, and forwards, until the flood subsided.
What was the purpose of releasing the bird, was it to test for a poisoned
I atmosphere?, could the population at the time of the flood, have been ’gassed’.
************

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I A published report said ’experts’ had estimated the height of the object as
I possibly 80 miles above the Earth.
I had heard the estimates before on numerous occasions by experts who had not

I witnessed the actual phenomena.

In January of 1980 the object that arrived with a fireball which an expert had

I estimated as probably 200 miles away from my position, and nearer Aberdeen,
was actually on the same hillside.

I In February 1980, following the incident on the Falkland Hill, an earth

tremor was detected in the area local to the sighting.

I If an object similar to what had appeared at that time arrived in the Pershire
area on the 14th of February, it is possible an earth tremor appromimately 1 :2-

I 2:4 on the Richter Scale would be detected in the following weeks, however In
this particular instance we did not have long to wait!.
I An Earthquake shook a Perthshire village on Sunday the 20th of February.
Experts estimate it had the equivelant power of 5 tonnes of TNT.
I The tremor measured 2:3 on the Richter Scale and had its epicentre just outside
Deanston, a mile and a half away. Terrified locals at first thought it was a gas

I explosion. The tremor moved through the village following what was described as
a crack and a rumble.

I Central Scotland Police called in the Edinburgh-based British Geological

Survey, which monitors earthquakes.

I A spokesman for the British Geological Survey said Doune appeared to be

susceptible to small tremors running along the Highland Fault which passes near
the village. Ten tremors hit Doune in one three month period in 1997, rising to a
I maximum of 2:7 on the Richter Scale.

I If there was to be another position or a site preparation required by a

’visitor’ in order to facilitate future activities in central Scotland, I suspect it

I would be in the Methven area where I would also expect an earth tremor of a
similar or smaller value.

I The clandestine operations of a ’visitor’ may still be continuing. Are the small
earth tremors we are now experiencing, seemingly emanating from fractures in
the Scottish terrain, effectively masking their activities?
I ************

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I The coloured highlight on the map above shows the approximate fJjghtpath of the
I fireball which appeared on Monday the 14th of February 2000.
I had expected any future ’object’ or fireball activity to continue in central

I Scotland on or around the 6th of January 2000, with the possibility of reports up
and until the first quarter of the moon on the 14th of themonth.
Apparently January passed without an incident being reported however on Monday
the 14th of February a mysterious fiery object described as a ’sphere’ of iridescent
I light was seen travelling across the sky
This object was reported to Police at around 6pm with sightings to airports and
emergency services from as far away as Falkirk, Tayside, Argyll and the Borders.

I It was thought to have been a Meteor passing 80 miles above Scotland,

A telephone conversation with the Police Spokesperson at St. Andrews
confirmed witness sightings of an object approaching the County of Fife from over
I the North Sea,
I asked the spokesperson how near the object was to Kingsbarnes. He was a little
bemused as he confirmed that the object apparently flew directly over this location,
I position ’C’ on the Fife map,
The object is then reported by witneses, to have continued on a flightpath towards
the City of Perth and position ’A ’.

I This enclosed diagram is intended as a guide, there may be slight variation

from the actual site positions.

I n
I
I Return of the Pearl Carrier
I If we imagine that all the preparations, whatever they may be, have been

I completed to enable a return of some mysterious ’Cosmic entity,’ could we at

some future date expect a ’visit’, and what may appear?

I There have been numerous claims of the sighting of UFO. An alleged craft,
usually comparatively smail and compact, and often described as highly
manoeuvrable; but I suspect that this object is only part of the whole!
I If we assume, or even imagine that highly advanced extraterrestrial beings
arrived on the earth in prehistoric times; It would probably have been in craft, or

I creations that the peoples of that time may have attempted to emulate, and
copy in stone.

I It has been assumed by scholars, that at some mysterious date, several

I thousand years BC; an Egyptian King may have looked out of his window and
observed the rays of the Sun beaming through the clouds. It has also been
suggested that beams spreading from this point source of light may have given
I the Egyptians the original idea for pyramid design.
They then assume that the Egyptians, at some later date, sailed off around the

I world to instruct other cultures in the arts of pyramid design and construction.
The pyramid complex at Teotihuacan, 30 miles north of Mexico City, covers an

I area of over 8 square miles, and all the edifices are aligned according to the
stars.

I Ruins in the Jungle of Guatemala and Yucatan, can bear comparison with the
colossal edifices ofEgypt.
I Is it possible the Egyptians also came to England; we also have a form of
pyramid in this country.

I Our ’Pyramid’ was constructed thousands of years ago and is the largest artificial
mound in Europe. Silbury Hill is 130 feet high, and lies a mile to the south of

I Avenbury.
Accurate information as to why it was built, and for what purpose is virtualiy

I non-existent, but many scholars have presumed it to be connected in some

mysterious way to the great ’stone circle’ complex of which Avebury could be the
centre.
I It has been suggested in the past that Silbury Hill has Roman connections i.e.
burial ground, but it has been accepted that it was formed earlier. A straight
a

I Roman road was actually diverted from its customary straight course to skirt the
mound, which would effectively date it before the Roman occupation.

I
I
I It is possible that Silbury Hill dates from the Bronze Age. This places its

I construction at the same time as the building of the Clava Cairns, near Inverness.
In the eighteenth century a shaft was sunk through the core of the hi II from the

I summit to the original ground level, but nothing of any importance was found.
If the mound had been created on the pyramid concept, that Is a single chamber

I containing the remains of a high Priestly class, then a single probe may have
missed any evidence that might remain there.
In 1922 excavations were dug into the sides of the mound in the hope of finding
I a burial chamber, but this proved to be unsatisfactory as nothing of any
significance was unearthed.

I Silbury Hill was once surrounded by a deep ditch almost twenty feet deep, and
excavations here found materials compatible with the theory that the date of the

I construction of Silbury Hill is similar to that of Avebury.

It has been suggested the only way to learn the secrets of the hill would be by

I complete excavation.
In the absence of significant evidence it can only be inferred that, like
Stonehenge, Woodhenge and Avebury, it’s original purpose was religious and may
I contain a tomb.

I Is it possible, that a pyramidal form may have appeared or was sighted in

prehistoric times over southern England?

I With the construction of the pyramid, there is also recorded in stone, the
consultation of man with the ’God’s’.

I This is also recorded in the scriptures when it describes a ’Lords House’, ie

’The Mountain of the Lords House will be established on the mountains’.
I From various records it could be specuiated that this immense object is of
Pyramidal, Step, or multi-foundation construction; and appears, or is expected to

I descend from the sky!.

I Scholars have asked, ’why did the Egyptians manhandle large blocks of
stone several miles across land from the quarries to a place of construction.?

I I can only specuiate that they built their ’copy’ pyramid on the exact spot, where
sometime before, an immense creation or craft bearing the God entity may have
appeared, or landed.
I I have included in the text an illustration forwarded by the Watch Tower,
I Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania. I had requested them for a magazine
issued in the 1980s but this was not to be found, instead they enclosed a

I
I
I Watchtower from January 1 st 1996.

I What these particular publications had in common was an artists interpretation of

a text taken from the The Revelation of St. John The Devine Ch 21 v 10.

I It was a painting of a New Jerusalem, a ’Golden City’, coming down from

’Heaven’.

I In both illustrations the shape is drawn as cube, or square, as the dimensions of

the city are given as the height, breadth and width as equal.
It could be interpreted another way. The wall is determined as being great
I and high, however, this does not necessarily define the wall as ’perpendicular’! if
the city lies four-square, with the height being equal; could in fact describe a

I Pyramid!.
This would also imply, if the Cheops Pyramid in Egypt, was intended to be a

I representation of a Golden City, a Mountain of a Lords House, it will be the

wrong shape. It shouid actually be higher!

I J.D. Cole of the Survey Department of the Egyptian Government,

ascertained that the following were the original measurements of the four sides
I at the base of the Cheops pyramid. 755:43ft 756:08ft 755:88ft 755:77ft. The
difference between the longest and shortest sides was only 7:9 inches. When

I completed it rose 481 :4ft, but the top 31 ft are now missing. At 481 :4ft, the four
sides incline at an angle from the ground of 51 :52 degrees.

I The term, "length of the height", has not been determined in the scripture.
Is this intended to be the measurement from a corner to the apex, or wall base

I centre to the apex? If we assume that this measurement is perpendicuiar from

the apex to the centre base, the height of the pyramid should measure
approxi mately 755+feet.
I The Egyptian builders may have at first attempted a construction height of 755ft
but this may have rendered the walls unstable and prone to slip, or even

I collapse!.

I I would also have imagined the Cheops Pyramid to be highly decorated on

its completion and not the naked stone surface which remains today.

I The scriptures describe the walls of the ’Golden City’ as jasper, and the city was
pure ’Gold,’ like unto clear glass.
It is also defined as having 12 foundations; each foundation garnished with all
I manner of precious stones.
The first foundation was jasper, 2nd sapphire, 3rd chalcedony; 4th emerald; 5th

I sardonyx; 6th sardius; 7th chrysolite; 8th beryl; 9th Topaz; 10th chrysoprasus
11th jacinth; and 12th amethyst.
I
I
I There were also twelve gates at the base of the Golden City, and in each

I gate was a ’Pearl’. And the street of the city was pure gold, as it were
transparent glass.

I I don’t expect the Cheops Pyramid would have had a wall of Jasper, or
Gold, but it may have been completely covered with some other shining material.
I This could probably have been fitted on a wooden framework fitted to the sides.
If a wooden frame was installed, we would find deep round holes cut into the
I stone at various points to take the ’dook’ pegs, on which to ’nail’ the timbers.
And Is It remotely possible, if we couid survey the base we may also find

I although concealed at the present time, 12 gates with pearls?, or representations

of the gates and pearls. Three gates on each side of the pyramid.

I Twelve foundations of jewels; each a different colour?

If we stand at Dalgety Bay, in Fife, on a dark night, and look across the river
Forth towards the City of Edinburgh, Is it the cities ’jewels’ that we see reflecting
I on the surface of the water?

I Was Silbury Hill an intended representation of a Pyramidal form that came,

or appeared in this country during our prehistoric times.

I And what were the ’Pearls’, did they then ’deploy’ from out off this pyramid!.
Were they the ’Pearls of the Skies’ as from the Chinese, and Tibetan mythology?

I There are ancient Egyptian scrolls describing a huge ’circle of fire’ that
appeared in the sky, and the later arrival of many flying ’fire circles’ which are

I said to have landed, and had the ability to take off again!
A fascinating extract from ancient Egyptian text the Papyrus of Nu states:
’I have alighted like the Hawk by the devine clouds, and the great dew. I have

I journeyed from the Earth to the Heaven.’

A second paragraph recalls Osiris in his ’sacred boat’ and It describes a sight

I very reminicent of the light ’object’ that I observed leave the hillside in January
of 1980.

I ’".the ’boat’ saileth about in heaven, rising like the Sun in the darkness.’

Are the ’circles of fire’ the ’fireballs’ which have been seen and reported
I several times over a number of years in the skies of central Scotland.
And could this ’fireball’ contain, or on some way protect the ’Pearl’, or what
I ancient Egyptian text may refer to as a winged disc, an object which has the
ability to take off again?

I The pearls may have subsequently been observed at Cairnpapple, the Clava
Cairns near Inverness, and the Balfarg Henge in Central Fife!; where the

I
I
I mysterious God entity occupants may have had consultations with early mankind.
I I suspect the flying ’Pearls’ were so called because of their ability to

I change colour and Hue, possibly comparable to the ’Mother of Pearl’ effect.
If we accept Silbury Hills construction to the time of the Bronze Age, and date it

I with the Clava Cairns, there may be buried in the lower sides of the hill
representation of the ’Pearls’ formed in twelve gateways, three on each side.

I Another fascinating coincidence presents itself near the SilburyHill.

There are several White Horses carved on the hillsides in Southern England.

I Oldbury Castle, other horses are near Marlborough and Pewsey.

In the Vale of White Horse, Berkshire, there is a prehistoric entrenchment that is

I named Uffingdon Castle; on the hiilside carved out of the turf is a White Horse
which has given the name to the valley.
The Castie is an Iron-Age fortified village, but the date of the White Horse
I is certainly much oider than is suggested by the tradition which relates it to one
of King Alfreds victories over the Danes. It may be contemporary with the Iron-
I age viliage or possibly earlier. Some authorities relate it to the Ridgeway, the
ancient trackway which runs along part of the Downs, and was probably used in

I the New Stone Age.

************

I Could this White Horse carved on a hillside be there to relate to a past

I victory of King Alfred; or may it have been carved for some other purpose.
If we accept Silbury Hill as ’pyramid’ representation, and with Stonehenge,
Woodhenge, and Avebury, as a place of religious activities; or where early man
I may have encountered a mysterious advanced technology; may we also expect
to find the White Horse.

I Angels described as riding ’White Horses’ are mentioned in scripture several

times. At the time of the second coming, the Angel that will rule the Earth for a

I thousand years wiil arrive, or be seen mounted on the back of a White Horse!.
Were the carvings on the southern English hillside intended as a permanent

I signal, or sign of allegiance to this entity?

************

I
I
I
I
I This illustration forwarded by the Bible Tract Society of Pennsylvania, depicts

I their interpretation of the ’New Jerusalem’, or ’Golden City’, descending to the

Earth from Heaven.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I eventually taking the place of the previous head as travelled in the same
direction and at a similar pace.
This head was slightly different to the first it now became evident that the
I posture was changing instead of being erect the head was now partly reclined
from the vertical turning towards my direction and the face now taken on an
I unmistakable expression of agonized pained despair.
Each and every detail of feature captured in cloud, from the eyelid with a

I faint hint of an eyelash to the small tight curls of hair covering the scalp, a
perfectiy formed nose and nostrils, and an ear with what could have been a type

I of single Pearl decoration suspended from the lobe.

There was however no mistaking the masculinity of the cloud forms and
I worn just above each ear surrounding the rear of the head was a woven leaf
decorative head-dress, a leaf similar to the laurel leaving me to suspect a Greek

I influence from some bygone age, but as each head in turn made its appearance
the faces continued to hold an expression of what seemed unbelievable torture,

I or horror.

I In all there were five Human likeness formed in cioud but as the last moved
out of view to my left its place was taken by two Skulls facing directly towards
my position and also moving at the same pace and altitude from North to South.
I The Skulls although perfectly formed were not of equal size, the first being the
larger and almost four times that of the following.
I This spectacular aerial display lasted only for what I estimated as a few

I minutes and terminated when the smaller skull moved out of vision.
It is impossible to determine how soon the images developed before being seen,

I or even how quickly they dissolved as they went out of frame, but measurements
confirm that the images traversed twenty degrees of sky from North to South. I
also had the impression of the cloud being quite dense leaving me in no doubt
I that the formations would have been detected on RADAR?

I Is it therefore possible that not all, but many of the large unexplained
Aerial objects alleged to be seen by witnesses all around the World, some

I reported to be as large as Battleships, may be formed out of manifested cloud.

************

I
I
I
I
I I could suggest that the objects seen at West Freu, may have been formed out of a
cloud manifestation by some as yet unknown phenomenon.
************
I The following extract is taken from the UMI Thomason Tracts microfilm series
I number 55:E.340[3] and is copied from the original text held in the Early Printed
Collections in the British Museum at 96 Euston Road in London.

I On the recommendation of The British Library I have contacted the National

Library of Scotland in Edinburgh. I am advised of their willingness to assist as

I they have in their possession copies of the original text, as is held by the British
Library in London.
The following extract is confirmed by the National Library of Scotland as
I being an almost word for word transcription of the original tract.

I ’Signs from Heaven: or SEVERALL APPARITIONS...’, 1646.

Seen and heard in the Ayre, in the Coun es of Cambridge and Norfolke on the 21st

I day of May last past in the afternoon 1646.

LONDON

I Printed by T.Forcet, dwelling in Old Fish-Street, in Heydon-court, 1646.

Strange Signes from Heaven, to warne and awaken the Eastern Association,
I with the Southern parts of the Kingdome.
XXX Pan the one and twentieth day of May in the afternoone...
I XVX in the year of 1646, there were very strange sights seen..
XXX and unwonted sounds heard in the Ayre, in several places as followeth.

I About New-Market in the county of Cambridge, there were seen by divers

I honest, sober and civill persons, and men of good credit, three men in the Ayre
striving, struggling, and tugging together, one of them having a drawn Sword in
his hand, from which Judgement God in in mercy preserve these three Kingdomes,
I of England, Scotland, and Ireland, from further conflicts and effusion of blood.
Betwixt New-Market and Thetford in the aforesaid County of Suffolk, there
I was observed a pillar or a cloud to ascend from the earth, with the bright hilts of a
sword towards the bottom of if, which pillar did ascend in a pyramidall form, and

I fashioned itself into the form of a spire or broach steeple, and there descended also
out of the sky the form of a Pike or Lance, with a very accute point out of the sky
self.
I like-wise, which was ready to interpose, but did not engage it

I
I
I
I The first Speare which came down from Heaven point blanck, was after a
while clean elevated higher, and that spire or Speare which went up from the earth,
ascended after it, to encounter with it a second time.
I This continued about an houre and a halfe.
At Sopham in the County of Cambridge aforesaid, a ball of wilde-fire fell upon the
I earth, which burnt up and spoiled about an Aker of graine, and when it had rolled
and runne up and down to the terror of many people and some Townesmen that

I it.
see it, it dissolved and left a most sulpherous stinck behind
Also at Camberton in the County aforesaid, divers of the trayned bands

I being being met at a muster, did behold the forme of a spire Steeple in the Skye,
with divers Swords set round about it.
Also at Brandon in the County of Norfolke the inhabitants were forced to
I come out of their houses to behold a Pike or Lance descending downward from
Heaven. The Lord in mercy bless and preserve his Church, and settle Peace and
I truth among our Church men.
In Brandon in the County aforesaid, was seen at the same time a Navie or

I Fleet of Ships in the Ayre, swiftly passing under Sayle, with Flags and streamers
hanged out, as if they were ready to give encounter.

I In Marshland in the County of of Norfolke, aforesaid, within three miles of

Kings Linne, a Captain, and a Lieutenant, with divers other persons of credit, did
heare in the time of Thunder, a sound as of a whole Regiment of Drums beating a
I call with perfect notes and stops, much admired by all that heardit.
And the like Military sound was heard in Suffolk upon the same day, and in
I other parts of the Eastern Association.
In all these places there was great thunder, with Raine and Hailestones of

I extraordinary bigness and round, and some hollow like rings.

The Lord grant that all the people of this Kingdom may take heed to every

I warning Trumpet of his, that we may speedily awaken out of our sins, and truly
turn to the Lord, fight his battles against our spiritual Enemies, and get those
inward riches of which we cannot be plundered of, and so seek an inward
I Kingdome of Righteousness and Peace, that we may be capable in his good time of
a settled peace, and stare in the outward Kingdome, and all through our Lord
I Jesus Christ.
************

I
I
I
I
I
I There was observed a pillar or a cloud to ascend from the earth, with the
bright hilts of a sword towards the bottom of it, which pillar did ascend in a
pyramidall form, and fashioned itself into the form of of a Pike or broach Steeple,
I and there descended also out of the skye the form of a Pike or Lance, with a very
accute point out of the skye likewise, which was ready to interpose but did not
I engage itself.
The first Speare which came down from Heaven point blanck, was after a

I while clean elevated higher, and the Spire or Spear which went up from the earth,
ascended after it, to encounter with it a second time. Also at Brandon in the

I County of Norfolke the inhabitants were forced to come out of their houses to
behold a Pike or Lance descending downward from Heaven.

I This is also very descriptive text, but in this particular instance it is of a

known phenomenon especially recognisable when we include...
I ’In all these places there was great Thunder, with Raine and Hailstones of

I extraordinary bigness and round, and some hollow like rings.

I I would doubt very much if this activity could be associated with the
alleged phenomenon of UFO, or that an Alien visitor was in someway intent on
gathering energy by the use of an extension or ’Sword.’
I The Pyramidal cloud descending from Heaven is actually termed ’Wall Cloud’ and
can extend beneath the ’Anvil’ of a ’Super Cell’.

I The pyramidal cloud ascending from the earth is probably the dust and
debris drawn upwards by the ’Speare, Lance or Pike’.

I The descriptions of atmospheric "weaponry," I have no doubt we would normally

refer to as the Vortex or Funnel.
I i therefore suspect that what was being witnessed and described in this
particular instance by the peoples of the 1646 English Counties, is is not some
I covert or clandestine activity by mysterious ’Alien’ visitors; but is actually the
known and familiar phenomenon of Tornado.
I ************

I
I
I
I
I
I The Faceless Warrior

I It is an experience fascinating yet foreboding to be the sole witness to a ghostiy

presence, or alien form of existence that is not at this time proved, neither
I accepted by the scientific world.
A form or apparition, that can fabricate or project human like appearance, but
I intent on concealing its features therefore remaining unrecognized.
Capable of presenting itself without warning in spectacular manner, but makes no

I attempt to communicate though I suspect it Is perfectly capable.

There is audible sounds of movement, a gentle creak of heavy garb clothing as

I the figure slowly changes its stance, and emits a sigh as it alters posture
drawing back its head to stand erect like a soldier ordered to attention.
It has an awareness of your attitude and position, and gives the observer the
I impression that it could converse if it so desired; but has chosen not to.
This encounter has taken place on its terms. And later, after what seems a pre-
I designated period of time the apparition gradually disappears. Leaving with the
same mysterious silent efficiency as had brought its arrival.

I Over the years from 1979 until 1982 several spectacular events occurred which

I unfortunately to this day, or to my knowiedge, have never been repeated.

It seems almost as if at this period in time, for whatever reason, I was being
allowed one privileged glimpse, a possible verification or the confirmation of
I another form of existence.

I On the 10th of January 1980 only days before the arrival of a Fireball on
the Lomond Hills in Central Fife I had a mysterious visitor. He arrived

I unannounced in the early hours of the morning and I ventured to name him the
"Faceless Warrior".

I It is now many years later that I have agreed to have a written account,
and a water colour sketch of my visitor forwarded to the Scottish Society for
Psychical Research. While have submitted the incident content; there were
I however, other very sinister aspects or activity that occurred around this time
which were related to this particular event.
I These details have not been made available, and are consequently withheld from
this Society.

I
I
I
I
I The Faceless Warrior

I The figure on this page was seen by a member of the public, who has asked my
opinion on his experience. The experiencer, who must remain anonymous under
I the case confidentially rules of the SSPR, was happy for me to publish his report
and drawing of the figure. He wonders if any reader has seen a similar figure

I under any circumstances, or would care to comment on it.

The National Museum of Scotland has been contacted to see if their experts on

I arm our etc. could identify the "uniform ", but they have written back to say that
they feel that the figure is not dressed or armed in any historical way. They
commented that they feel it looked more theatrical. Now for the experiencer’s
I report:
Rep: I was awakened at approximately 3am by the sound of gentle creaking, it
I seemed in close proximity and without switching on any lighting, I turned to face
the direction of this mysterious noise. Looking round the room I could see quite

I clearly by the illumination of the street light outside the window. There was a
movement behind me in the corner, cautiously taking two steps slowly forward to

I peer into the part shadow that was cast by the wardrobe from the street light, I
was aware of a presence.

I A figure stood about six feet tall and was dressed in black, which appeared to be of
leather or similar garb. As it slowly swayed in its position it gently creaked,
I sounding very like a leather coat when we bend the arm at the elbow.

I Very prominent and to the fore was a shield that also looked of leathery material
which stood on the floor, supported behind by an unseen right hand. The shield

I had one vertical central strip and three short horizontal strips dividing the face into
eight sections.

I On its left hand it held a form of lance or spear, I could not see the top or point
as it disappeared into darkness near the ceiling.
I On the head was worn a black leather type helmet which had a narrow strip of the
same material projecting downwards covering the nose completely; on each side of

I the helmet two ’Viking’ or similar emblems; I have drawn them as horns but this is
not accurate as only the lower part of this decoration was in view, but these

I extensions may have been in the form of a wing.