Professional Documents
Culture Documents
c
c
Ms. Huma Ayub
½?Abid Khan
½?Agha Nawazish
½?Anum Khalid
½?uawwad Mir
½? hrish Mushtaq
!!"#?ººth Jun 20º0
c
$
uirst and for most w ar thankful to Allah for giving us th mind to think h art to f ll and
str ngth to compl t this r port.
W would also lik to thank our cours instructor Maǯam Huma Ayub for h r advic and
sugg stions to this r port. Without th assistanc of h r it would hav b n difficult and
stup ndous for our group with m ag r r sourc s at its disposal to accomplish it
?
?
?
METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................................................... º0
uINDING ...................................................................................................................................................................... ºº
RECOMMENDATION ............................................................................................................................................. 23
CONCLUION ............................................................................................................................................................... 25
?
?
?
?
?
uigur º Risk Manag m nt uram work ............................................................................................................. i
uigur 2: Compon nts of R gulatory Capital of ABL ................................................................................... ii
uigur 3 Capital Ad quacy Ratio ..........................................................................................................................iii
uigur 4 Cr dit Risk Exposur .............................................................................................................................. iv
uigur 5 Loan Classification And Provisioning ............................................................................................. iv
?
?
c
A comm rcial bank acts an int rm diary b tw n surplus units ( ntiti s having xc ss of
fund) and d ficit units ( ntiti s in n d of funds). Th ss ntiality of a comm rcial bank for
a country cannot b d scrib d nough as it plays various rol s for instanc it also plays an
important rol in nhancing conomic conditions of th country by allowing p opl to
ngag in various conomic activiti s using borrow d funds. Banks ar a fundam ntal
compon nt of th financial syst m and ar also activ play rs in financial mark ts.
Th r for it is important to nsur saf ty and soundn ss of financial syst m of th country
by putting up param t rs for banks.
Capital risk is clos ly ti d to th ass t quality and a bank's ov rall risk profil . Banks and
financial institutions ar fac d with long-t rm futur unc rtainti s which th y int nd to
account for. It is in this cont xt that th Bas l Accords w r cr at d aiming to nhanc th
risk manag m nt functions of banks and financial institutions. Bas l II provid s dir ctiv s
on th r gulatory minimum amount of capital that banks should hold against th ir risks
such as cr dit risk mark t risk op rational risk and oth rs. Basically capital provid s a
cushion for banks to absorb loss s and also provid s r ady acc ss to financial mark ts
guards against liquidity probl ms. Th mor risk tak n th gr at r is th amount of capital
r quir d. To hold mor capital m ans forcing banks to hav mor of th ir own funds at risk.
Ev n a bank's divid nd policy aff cts its capital risk by influ ncing r tain d arnings. o
managing th capital risk through diff r nt t chniqu s is th important conc rn of th
bank.
#!' is th s cond of th Bas l Accords which ar r comm ndations on banking laws
and r gulations issu d by th Bas l Committ on Banking up rvision. Th purpos of
Bas l II which was initially publish d in Jun 2004 is to cr at an int rnational standard
that banking r gulators can us wh n cr ating r gulations about how much capital banks
n d to put asid to guard against th typ s of financial and op rational risks banks fac .
Advocat s of Bas l II b li v that such an int rnational standard can h lp prot ct th
int rnational financial syst m from th typ s of probl ms that might aris should a major
bank or a s ri s of banks collaps . In practic Bas l II att mpts to accomplish this by
s tting up rigorous risk and capital manag m nt r quir m nts d sign d to nsur that a
bank holds capital r s rv s appropriat to th risk th bank xpos s its lf to through its
l nding and inv stm nt practic s. G n rally sp aking th s rul s m an that th gr at r
risk to which th bank is xpos d th gr at r th amount of capital th bank n ds to hold
to saf guard its solv ncy and ov rall conomic stability.
÷ ????
?
uinancial stability xists wh n th financial syst m is r sili nt to a wid rang of conomic
and financial shocks and abl to absorb financial crisis loss s with l ast disruption. It
cannot b mphasiz d nough that th soundn ss and ffici ncy of banks to manag
various risk including th capital risk which is important as it matt rs a lot for financial
stability. Th r for in Pakistan Bas l Accords r comm ndations ar nforc d by tat
Bank of Pakistan in th ir guid lin s that ar provid d to th banking industry so that
comm rcial banks can tailor th ir op rations accordingly. W can s that this syst m is
ff ctiv in many ways.
?
÷ ????
?
DzTo find out how Askari and Alfalah Bank manag s th capital risk and what
typ of t chniqu s th y us s for cr dit risk valuation and ass ssm nt as to
mitigat th ir cr dit risk xposur
?
?
÷ ????
?
$
Banks ar invariably fac d with diff r nt typ s of risks that may hav a pot ntially n gativ
ff ct on th ir busin ss. Risk manag m nt in bank op rations includ s risk id ntification
m asur m nt and ass ssm nt and its obj ctiv is to minimiz n gativ ff cts risks can
hav on th financial r sult and capital of a bank. Banks ar th r for r quir d to form a
sp cial organizational unit in charg of risk manag m nt. Also th y ar r quir d to
pr scrib proc dur s for risk id ntification m asur m nt and ass ssm nt as w ll as
proc dur s for risk manag m nt.
In v ry financial institution risk manag m nt activiti s broadly tak plac simultan ously
at following diff r nt hi rarchy l v ls.
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?
?
Dat Visit d: May 25th 20º0?
÷ ????
?
Th risks to which a bank is particularly xpos d in its op rations ar : liquidity risk cr dit
risk mark t risks (int r st rat risk for ign xchang risk and risk from chang in mark t
pric of s curiti s financial d rivativ s and commoditi s) xposur risks inv stm nt
risks risks r lating to th country of origin of th ntity to which a bank is xpos d
op rational risk l gal risk r putational risk and strat gic risk.2
-
urom º65 to ºº th r w r about ight bank failur s (or bankruptci s) in th Unit d
tat s. Bank failur s w r particularly promin nt during th '0s a tim which is usually
r f rr d to as th "savings and loan crisis". Banks throughout th world w r l nding
xt nsiv ly whil countri s' xt rnal ind bt dn ss was growing at an unsustainabl rat .
As a r sult th pot ntial for th bankruptcy of th major int rnational banks b caus gr w
as a r sult of low s curity. In ord r to pr v nt this risk th Bas l Committ on Banking
up rvision compris d of c ntral banks and sup rvisory authoriti s of º0 countri s m t in
º in Bas l witz rland. Th Bas l Committ consists of r pr s ntativ s from c ntral
banks and r gulatory authoriti s of th Group of T n countri s plus oth rs (sp cifically
Lux mbourg and pain). Th committ do s not hav th authority to nforc
r comm ndations although most m mb r countri s (and oth rs) t nd to impl m nt th
Committ 's polici s. This m ans that r comm ndations ar nforc d through national (or
EU-wid ) laws and r gulations rath r than as a r sult of th committ 's
r comm ndations - thus som tim may pass b tw n r comm ndations and
impl m ntation as law at th national l v l.3
)
&.!/#!'
In º th Bas l I Capital Accord was cr at d. Th g n ral purpos was to:
º. tr ngth n th stability of int rnational banking syst m.
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?
l
Dat Visit d: May 25th 20º0
?
?
Dat Visit d: May 2 th 20º0?
÷ ????
?
2. t up a fair and a consist nt int rnational banking syst m in ord r to d cr as
comp titiv in quality among int rnational banks.
Th basic achi v m nt of Bas l I hav b n to d fin bank capital and th so-call d bank
capital ratio. In ord r to s t up a minimum risk-bas d capital ad quacy applying to all
banks and gov rnm nts in th world a g n ral d finition of capital was r quir d. Ind d
b for this int rnational agr m nt th r was no singl d finition of bank capital. Th first
st p of th agr m nt was thus to d fin it.
0(&c#.#'
Bas l I d fin capital bas d on two ti rs:
º. Ti r º (Cor Capital): Ti r º capital includ s stock issu s (or shar hold rǯs quity) and
d clar d r s rv s such as loan loss r s rv s s t asid to cushion futur loss s or for
smoothing out incom variations.
2. Ti r 2 (uppl m ntary Capital): Ti r 2 capital includ s all oth r capital such as gains on
inv stm nt ass ts long-t rm d bt with maturity gr at r than fiv y ars and hidd n
r s rv s (i. . xc ss allowanc for loss s on loans and l as s).
/#''!/#!'
Bas l I Capital Accord has b n criticiz d on s v ral grounds. Th main criticisms includ
th following:
=? //&"#"/+&&!%
Th r ar four broad risk w ightings (0% 20% 50% and º00%) as shown in
uigur º bas d on an % minimum capital ratio.
=? #+#!&//#'&!%
÷ ????
?
Th assumption that a minimum % capital ratio is suffici nt to prot ct banks from
failur do s not tak into account th changing natur of d fault risk.
=? &+*""/&(!&+&/+&&!%
Th capital charg s ar s t at th sam l v l r gardl ss of th maturity of a cr dit
xposur .
=? .'/+#'+'#"/."#'/&+"&.#& &!%
Th curr nt capital r quir m nts ignor th diff r nt l v l of risks associat d with
diff r nt curr nci s and macro conomic risk. In oth r words it assum s a common
mark t to all actors which is not tru in r ality.
=? #+%/&+*""/.&/',&!/+#"//+!
In r ality th sum of individual risk xposur s is not th sam as th risk r duction
through portfolio div rsification. Th r for summing all risks might provid
incorr ct judgm nt of risk. A r m dy would b to cr at an int rnal cr dit risk
mod l - for xampl on similar to th mod l as d v lop d by th bank to calculat
mark t risk. This r mark is also valid for all oth r w akn ss s.
Th s list d criticisms hav l d to th cr ation of a n w Bas l Capital Accord known
as Bas l II which adds op rational risk and also d fin s n w calculations of cr dit
risk. Op rational risk is th risk of loss arising from human rror or manag m nt
failur .4
Bas l Committ on Banking up rvision (BCB) finaliz d th N w Capital Ad quacy
fram work commonly known as Bas l II in Jun 2004. This n w capital ad quacy r gim
off rs a compr h nsiv and mor risk s nsitiv capital allocation m thodology for major
risk cat gori s. Bas l II fram work compris s of thr parts r f rr d to as thr pillars of
th Accord; Pillar I which is about minimum capital r quir m nt pr scrib s th capital
allocation m thodology against cr dit and op rational risks. Th capital r quir m nt for
Mark t risk r mains th sam as nvisag d und r Bas l I in º6. Th risks which ar not
captur d und r pillar I ar cov r d in pillar II. Pillar II of th N w Accord outlin s th
sup rvisory r vi w proc ss of th capital ad quacy of banks. It r quir s banks to stablish
a robust risk manag m nt fram work to id ntify ass ss and manag major risks inh r nt
in th institution and allocat ad quat capital against thos risks. Th sup rvisor has to
r vi w th ad quacy of risk manag m nt function and capital allocation m chanism
against major risks including thos that ar not cov r d und r pillar I i. . Liquidity Risk
Conc ntration risk Int r st rat Risk in Banking Book tc. and nsur s it comm nsurat
with th siz and natur of busin ss of th institution. Th pillar 3 of th Accord s ts out
disclosur r quir m nt d p nding upon which particular approach of Pillar I th
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?
"
#!
$
p
Dat Visit d: May 25th 20º0?
÷ ??!??
?
institutions adopt for calculating Minimum Capital R quir m nt. Th N w Capital Accord is
not mandatory v n for th m mb r countri s of th BCB. How v r th r is cons nsus
among m mb r countri s to adopt Bas l II standardiz d approach by th nd of 2006 and
advanc approach s by 200 . Among Non M mb r countri s Bas l II is xp ct d to b
adopt d by most of th conomi s in 200 or lat r on.
$) #!'1
Th Bas l I had a numb r of flaws. uor instanc it provid d Dzon siz fit all approach and
did not diff r ntiat b tw n ass ts having l ss risk and ass ts having high r risk. Th r
was no capital allocation against op rational risk as w ll as no consid ration was giv n to
oth r risks such as conc ntration risk liquidity risk tc. Th n w accord has risk
manag m nt mb dd d in it; so it will b a driving forc for bringing improv m nt in risk
manag m nt capabiliti s of banks. Bas l II provid s inc ntiv to banks having good risk
manag m nt and punish s thos that ar not managing th ir risk profil appropriat ly by
r quiring high r capital.
On th basis of for going and k ping in vi w th global r spons towards Bas l II BP has
in principl d cid d to adopt Bas l II in Pakistan. Th nsuing pag s outlin a propos d
Roadmap for th impl m ntation of Bas l II in Pakistan. Whil pr paring this Roadmap th
tat Bank has conduct d a surv y to ass ss th xisting capacity of th banks and th ir
financial position to m t additional capital r quir m nt. Th plans of oth r countri s for
adoption of Bas l II hav also b n r vi w d. Efforts hav b n mad to draw a r alistic
tim lin so as to giv banks suffici nt tim to pr par th ms lv s for m ting th
r quir m nt of Bas l II.5
c
c
÷ ??%??
?
possibl but must includ th fiv DzCs th s ar ; charact r cr dibility capital collat ral
and cycl ( conomic conditions) in addition to th 5 Cs an xp rt may also tak into
consid ration th int r st rat .
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?
ë
ë
Dat Visit d: May 25th 20º0
?
÷ ??&??
?
As to conduct our proj ct r s arch w will us both primary and s condary data
3
V? Two banks
c c
V? Int rn t
V? N ws Articl s
c
V? Int rvi w with Bank Manag rs.
?
$$
c
$$3
÷ ??#??
?
Askari Bank Limit d tak s prid in b ing on of th comm rcial banks in Pakistan that is
ff ctiv ly managing risk through an ffici nt risk manag m nt fram work. Th Bank
striv s to à ü
i
i. (Risk manag m nt fram work can b r f rr d in Ann xur ; figur º)
According to th Annual R port of 200 Askari Bank njoys th ntity rating:
"*&
)&&-4
Th Bank has provid d an ov rvi w of th ir risk manag m nt in th ir annual r port. Risk
Manag m nt is a cor function at th Bank that p rforms critical activiti s of m asuring
monitoring controlling and r porting cr dit mark t liquidity op rational and oth r risks.
Th risk manag m nt fram work of th Bank cov rs (i) risk polici s and limits structur
(ii) risk infrastructur and (iii) risk m asur m nt m thodologi s.
In th Annual R port of 200 th Bank outlin s its Capital Risk manag m nt as follows:
c
5c
+./..'+#"!
tandardiz d Approach is us d for calculating th Capital Ad quacy for Mark t and Cr dit
risk whil Basic Indicator Approach (BIA) is us d for Op rational Risk Capital Ad quacy
purpos .
Th Bank has two subsidiari s Askari Inv stm nt Manag m nt Limit d (AIML) and Askari
curiti s Limit d (AL). AIML is th wholly-own d subsidiary of Askari Bank Limit d
whil AL is 4% own d by th Bank. Both th s ntiti s ar includ d whil calculating
Capital Ad quacy for th Bank using full consolidation m thod. Th fact that Askari Bank
has n ith r any significant minority inv stm nts in banking s curiti s or any oth r
financial ntiti s nor do s it has any majority or significant minority quity holding in
insuranc xclud s it from a n d for furth r consolidation. uurth rmor th Bank do s
not indulg in any s curitization activity that shi lds it from th risk inh r nt in
s curitization.
÷ ????
?
and off-balanc sh t xposur s. Th total risk-w ight d xposur s compris th cr dit
risk mark t risk and op rational risk.
.!/2.!&!#"c!!
?
uor dom stic claims ECAIs r comm nd d by th tat Bank of Pakistan (BP) nam ly
Pakistan Cr dit Rating Ag ncy Limit d (PACRA) and JCR-VI Cr dit Rating Company
Limit d (JCR-VI) w r us d. uor for ign curr ncy claims on sov r igns risk w ights w r
assign d on th basis of th cr dit ratings assign d by Moodyǯs. uor claims on for ign
ntiti s rating of P Moodyǯs and uitch Ratings w r us d. uor ign xposur s not rat d
by any of th afor m ntion d rating ag nci s w r cat goriz d as unrat d.
Typ of xposur s for which ach ag ncy is us d in th y ar nd d 200 is pr s nt d b low
c#.#'#6#+ &##!#+&7-89::;
Th capital to risk w ight d ass ts ratio calculat d in accordanc with th tat Bank of
Pakistanǯs guid lin s on capital ad quacy using Bas l II standardiz d approach s for cr dit
and mark t risks and basic indicator approach for op rational risk is pr s nt d in uigur 2
3 in Ann xur .
c
?
$( +?,
- ?*
? 3
?*
?
- ? ?
- ÷ ?4 ?*"
÷
+
. ? 5
/0-*-.12? /3*-2
$
?*
??
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
!
?http://www.askaribank.com.pk/R ports/Askari%20uinancials%20200.pdf
??'(?#)?##??
÷ ????
?
#&% !% #"#*" .#&": This d partm nt d v lops and impl m nts th
mark t risk policy and risk m asuring / monitoring m thodology and r vi ws and r ports
mark t risk against r gulatory and int rnal limits. Basically this d partm nt d als with risk
r lat d to bankǯs inv stm nts for .g. tr asury bills pr f r nc shar s tc.
Bas l Accord II is a mor cons rvativ m thod to mitigat cr dit risk which r quir s banks
to k p ch ck on cr dit op rational and mark t risk to manag its capital. Bas l Accord II
r stricts th risk to b born by d positors to minimum l v l arising from th banksǯ l nding
activiti s. It r quir s banks to shar risk by inj cting its own capital wh n inv sting in
riski r ass ts in form of loans and advanc s.
Th typ of capital b ing maintain d at Askari Bank Limit d is r gulatory capital and as th
nam impli s it is r gulat d by th C ntral Bank (BP). Th Bank is r quir d to quantify
risk w ight d ass ts and s t asid capital according to th risk bank und rtak s.
÷ ????
?
Bas l Impl m ntation Division is r sponsibl for:
=? Impl m ntation of Bas l Accords mainly Bas l Accord II in l nding activiti s and
=? Calculations of Capital Ad quacy Ratio bas d on guid lin s of BP.
Wh n th d partm nt r c iv s th r port for loan r qu st th first st p is to cat goriz it
in any on of th following:
=? R tail portfolio
=? Mortgag
=? Corporat
=? Public/ s ctor nt rpris (PE)
=? Gov rnm nt
=? Past du xposur
Th tr atm nt of ach cat gory is uniqu ly d sign d by th Bank und r th BP guid lin .
Th d partm nt th n ch cks th collat ral. A f w xampl s of th collat ral tak n by th
bank as sp cifi d by th BP ar :
=? Cash margins or d posit
=? Gold r s rv s
=? Gov rnm nt s curiti s
Th bank th n calculat s th Risk W ight d Ass ts= Exposur Ȃ Eligibl Collat ral. By
clubbing all th s risk w ight d ass ts th d partm nt calculat s th capital it n ds to s t
asid . Th Cr dit Risk xposur of 200 is in figur 3: c ?
?
??
??
?
?
?
?c ?
?
??
?
?
Th Post uacto R vi ws for borrow rs ar don aft r r gular int rvals to know about th
curr nt position. Bas d on th r sults of various analys s th division rais s alarm if it
cit s probl ms in th loan p rformanc and futur cours of action with th custom r is
plann d. uor xampl Bank is now r stricting its cr dit faciliti s to T xtil s ctor to rar
cas s sinc it has b n mov d from low risk to high risk du to gr at r no. of NPLs arising
÷ ????
?
from r c nt v nts lik strik s d clin in t xtil p rformanc fluctuating gov rnm nt
polici s tc.
c
? c
According to Askari Bank diff r nt nvironm ntal factors hav a dir ct whil som hav
indir ct impact on cr dit risk for bank:
=? uluctuating Gov rnm nt polici s: fluctuations in gov rnm nt polici s hit many
s ctors badly r nd ring th m incapabl to r pay loans l ading to incr as in NPLs.
=? En rgy Crisis: this has l d to d t rioration in p rformanc of many on -tim l ading
and favorabl ntiti s to provid cr dit lik T xtil ctor.
=? Inflation: burd n of individuals/ corporations tc. incr as th y ar lik ly to d fault.
=? Un mploym nt: downsizing limit d job opportuniti s and so l ads to inability to
pay off loans.
c
c
As Askari Bank has a d c ntraliz d syst m probl m oft n aris s from Manag m nt
Information yst m to gath r data from all sourc s that l ads to probl ms in calculating
CAR. It may happ n that information from som d partm nts mayb d lay d or r ports
may hav flaws; data coll ction and proc ssing of bulk of data tak s tim and bank oft n
fac s tim constraint in submitting th Capital Ad quacy r turn r port r quir d by BP at
r quir d tim du to th s factors.
@
cccc
This is don as p r th typ of facility and according to BPǯs r gulation. uor xampl if
bank has l nt cr dit for auto loans according to BP guid lin s th loan shall b classifi d
and provisioning shall b mad according to uigur 4 in Ann xur .
Askari Bank has mbark d upon a major initiativ of ov rhauling its t chnology
infrastructur with th aim of upgrading busin ss and op rational capabiliti s whil
improving quality of custom r s rvic .
uor this purpos fiv n w softwar application products hav b n acquir d and ar
curr ntly in diff r nt stag s of impl m ntation. On of th s includ s a Risk Manag m nt
yst m. Th bank is in proc ss of impl m nting IuLEX DzR v l us risk manag m nt
softwar of Oracl financial rvic s olution having th ability to g n rat liv Capital
Ad quacy Ratio and at day nd g n rat r port.
÷ ????
?
Th k y f atur s of this product includ :
=? Pr -configur d r ports cov ring Pillar I and Pillar II r porting
=? Enabl s tabular as w ll as graphical r porting
=? Drill-through functionality allows for d tail d analysis
=? Risk m asur s and capital numb rs display d as point in- tim valu s tr nds h at
maps distributions tc.
=? M trics display d across multipl l v ls and risk cat gori s
?
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
%
?http://www.askaribank.com.pk/R ports/Askari%20uinancials%20200.pdf
http://www.oracl .com/us/industri s/financial-s rvic s/046223.pdf
Dat Visit d: Jun th 20º0?
÷ ????
?
?
Bank Alfalah manag s th capital as to saf guard its ability to absorb larg un xp ct d
loss s and to prot ct d positors and oth r claim hold rs. It is th policy of th bank to
maintain a strong capital bas so as to maintain inv stor cr ditor and mark t confid nc
and to sustain futur d v lopm nt of th busin ss. PACRA a pr mi r rating ag ncy of th
country has rat d th bank ǮAAǯ (doubl A) Entity Rating for long t rm and Aº (A on
plus) for th short t rm.
Bank Alfalah has in plac an approv d int grat d risk manag m nt fram work for
managing cr dit risk mark t risk liquidity risk and op rational risk und r risk
manag m nt policy and risk manag m nt and int rnal control manual according to BP
pr scription. In it th risk awar n ss cultur is b ing ncourag d by communicating th
principl s of prop r risk manag m nt to all bank mploy s.
?
uollowing is th gov rnanc structur and important polici s on risk manag m nt of th
bank
=? Th board of dir ctors through sub committ call d board risk manag m nt
committ (BRMC) ov rs s th ov rall risk of bank
÷ ??!??
?
=? Aft r r vi wing th Bas l II th bank has xclusiv ly pursu d th impl m ntation of
Bas l II with th h lp of xt rnal consultants and has compil d with all pillars
r quir m nts of Bas l II.
=? In th light of BP circulars and guid lin s significant progr ss has also b n mad
in r sp ct of advanc approach s of Bas l II.
=? Th bank has acquir d t m nos T24 banking syst m as its cor banking solutions
and its risk manag m nt syst m call d T-Risk us d for managing cr dit mark t and
op rational risk.
=? A watch list proc dur is also functioning which id ntifi s loans showing arly
warning signals of b coming non-p rforming.
c
?
uor managing th cr dit risk und r th r gulatory capital Bank Alfalah has d v lop d a
proc dural manual and proc ss s that hav b n s t for fin -tuning syst ms and
proc dur s informational t chnology capabiliti s and risk gov rnanc structur as to m t
th advanc d approach s as w ll. uor th impl m ntation of Bas l II advanc approach s
bank is consid ring appointm nt of a consultant firm to assist it in this r gard.
Mor ov r Cr dit Risk D partm nt looks aft r all th asp cts of cr dit risk and H ad of th
Cr dit Risk D partm nt r ports dir ctly to th G n ral Manag r (GM) in Risk Manag m nt
Division.
uollowing ar som m asur s th Bank Alfalah conducts b for acc pting th loan r qu st
as to mitigat cr dit risk.
=? Know your custom r
=? Purpos of l nding
=? uinancial stat m nts including ratio analysis
=? Working styl : wh th r th custom rs do busin ss on cr dit or cash?
=? As to know th int grity of th custom r th y ch ck th CIB r port which provid a
consolidat d pictur of a borrow r as of a giv n dat bas d on th information/data
suppli d by th banks.
=? Mark t r putation
=? D bt history tc
÷ ??%??
?
#"#&A..&#+)"&"#'#"*#!
Bank Alfalah us s both approach s.
#"#&A..&#+)
Th bank as p r tat Bank of Pakistanǯs guid lin has migrat d to Bas l II as on January
0º 200 with tandardiz d Approach. o for th purpos of stimating cr dit risk
w ight d ass ts th Bank Alfalah limit d is using standard approach of BP Bas l II accord.
"&"#'#"*#!
A sophisticat d Int rnal Cr dit Rating yst m has b n d v lop d by th bank which is
capabl of m asuring count r party risk in accordanc with b st practic s. Th syst m
tak s into consid ration qualitativ and quantitativ factors of th count r party and
g n rat s an int rnal rating of that count r party. Th syst m has b n statistically t st d
validat d and ch ck d for complianc with th tat Bank of Pakistanǯs guid lin s for
Int rnal Cr dit Rating. Th syst m is back d by s cur d databas with back up support and
÷ ??&??
?
is capabl of g n rating MI r port providing snapshot of th ntir portfolio for d cision
making. This syst m supports th Int rnal Rating Bas d Approach.
Und r th Int rnal Rating yst m th bank is allow d to monitor risk of count rparti s
against diff r nt grad /scor s ranging from º-º2 (º b ing b st and º0-º2 for d fault rs.
Diff r nt variabl s hav b n id ntifi d according to which scor s ar mark d. Lik
busin ss op ration history l gal ntity mark t r putation tc.
=? Bank Alfalah l nds mon y to th individual ME comm rcial and corporat firms. It
rang s from small to big firms th r for bank is of th vi w that not all of th firms
or individuals can g t rat d from xt rnal cr dit rating ag nci s as th y ar v ry
xp nsiv .
=? Mor ov r th y canǯt r ly only on th xt rnal cr dit rating ag nci s.
c''#&#'
÷ ??#??
?
&2#.'
Bank Alfalah l nds Rs 40 million to a particular count rparty which is s cur d by collat ral
worth Rs 30 million. Rating of th count r part is B wh r as th collat ral consists of
s curiti s issu d by an A-rat d company. o th risk w ight for th count rparty is º50%
and th risk w ight for th collat ral is 50%.
Und r th Compr h nsiv Approach: Assum that th adjustm nt to xposur to allow for
possibl futur incr as s in th xposur is º0% and th adjustm nt to th collat ral to
allow for possibl futur d cr as s in its valu is -º5%. Th n w xposur is:
º.º X 40 -0.5 X 30 = º.5 million
A risk w ight of º50% is appli d to this xposur
Risk-adjust d ass ts = º.5 X º.5 = Rs. 2 . 5 M
.!/c''#&#'
Th d cision on th typ and quantum of collat ral for ach transaction is tak n by th
Cr dit Approving Authority as p r th cr dit approving authorization approv d by th
Board of Dir ctors. Collat ral us d includ : gov rnm nt of Pakistan guarant s gold cash
shar s gov rnm nt s curiti s all that fall in ligibl collat ral.
Bank Alfalah limit d d t rmin s th appropriat collat ral for ach facility bas d on th
typ of product and count r party.
=? In cas of corporat and ME financing fix d ass ts ar g n rally tak n as s curity
for long r t nor loans and curr nt ass ts for working capital financ .
=? uor proj ct financ s curity of th ass ts of th borrow r and assignm nt of th
und rlying proj ct contracts is g n rally obtain d. Additional s curiti s such as
pl dg of shar s cash collat ral tc may also b tak n. Bank Alfalah markup for
shar s is 35- 50% and for cash and all A cat gory s curiti s is º0%.
=? Mor ov r in ord r to cov r th ntir xposur P rsonal Guarant of Dir ctors is
also obtain d by th bank.
=? uor r tail products th s curity to b tak n is d fin d by th product policy for th
r sp ctiv products.
=? Housing loans and automobil loans ar s cur d by th s curity of th prop rty
b ing financ d. Th valuation of th prop rti s is carri d out by an approv d
valuation ag ncy. H r th Bank Alfalah markup for prop rty is 40%.
÷ ????
?
Bank alfalah usually avoid litigation th r for if th cli nt hasnǯt payback th cr dit th n
l v rag of 3-6months is giv n and th y ch ck on it.
Proactiv cr dit risk manag m nt practic s in th form of studi s r s arch work int rnal
rating syst m int grat d bank-wid risk manag m nt and int rnal control fram work
adh r nc to Bas l II accord portfolio monitoring ar only som of th prud nt m asur s
th bank is ngag d in for mitigating risk xposur s.
?
÷ ????
?
c
?
? ?
?
=? Askari Bank at pr s nt r quir s th ntiti s from small st (individual) to larg st
(MNC) to g t ratings from xt rnal rating ag nci s. How v r it may b losing
custom rs for loans as th y may not afford th cost of valuation and docum ntation.
Askari bank do s off r s rvic s at charg th r for burd n r mains on ntiti s.
Askari Bank should form polici s to giv r laxation to ntiti s for loan proc ss.
=? Th Bank should mak an organization wid n tworking with a c ntral databas
wh r information from all th d partm nts from bank is availabl and can b us d
for risk mitigation purpos s wh n v r n d d. It will sav tim .
=? Askari Bank can initiat th proc ss of impl m nting IRB d spit th tim cost and
fforts involv d. This would allow th Bank to k p asid capital as clos to th risk
it is taking with th xposur s.
=? Th bank should impl m nt VAR syst m for Cr dit Risk Mitigation as w ll as it is
b ing us d for Mark t Risk manag m nt. Bas l II is shifting its focus from r gulatory
capital to conomic capital. Economic capital r quir s banks to s t asid capital
bas d on actual xp ct d and un xp ct d loss s bas d on historic data th syst m
is abl to calculat th possibl risk associat d with sampl s t and it would h lp th
bank also pr par for un xp ct d loss.
=? Th Bank can formulat polici s to provid insuranc to th ntiti s that p rform
w ll on an av rag but may d fault for loan r paym nt du to unfor s n
involuntary factors such as natural disast rs. This will incr as bankǯs custom r
bas .
? ?
÷ ????
?
? ?
?
÷ ????
?
c c
Bas d on our proj ct w can say that th banking syst m and in turn financial syst m is
saf and sound du to th impl m ntation of Bas l Accord II in BP r gulation. Th banks
ar abl to pr v nt or limit risk to th ir capitals by s tting asid part of th ir total capital
risk for risk and also g t d posits without d positors f aring loss du to risk from banksǯ
activiti s. W can s many of its advantag s in form of:
=? R duction in th l v l of risk bank cr ditors ar xpos d to (i. . to prot ct
d positors)
=? R duction in yst mic risk r duction that is r duction in possibiliti s that may
caus multipl or major bank failur s
=? Avoid misus of banks for ill gal and un thical purpos s
=? Cr dit allocation -- to dir ct cr dit to favor d s ctors
=? Incr as in th confid nc of inv stors local and for ign rs du to ff ctiv risk
mitigation fram work in plac .
But still bank has to k p th ms lv s up-to-dat to th n w t chnologi s and softwar
which can mak th ir proc dur s and way of managing cr dit risk mor ff ctiv . Now
Bas l Committ has introduc d Bas l III mor conc ntrating on liquidity risk. Th r for
banks hav to focus on that too as cr dit risk canǯt b analyz d in isolation.
?
? ?
÷ ????
?
?
? ?
÷ ????
?
?
?
÷ ??!??
?
?
*&-!%#"#*"�&%
÷ ??
??
?
?
*&9c.""!/*'#& c#.#'/
÷ ??
??
?
?
*&7c#.#'6#+ #
÷ ??
??
?
?
*&Cc&!%2.!&
*&D#"c'#!!/+#"" &,!""*
÷ ??
"??
?
5 $?
÷ ??"??
?