TFAG and the Weinsteins' deception was first uncovered in or about November Iraq, Westside and TFAG agreed that:. Westside produced and distributed the film Fahrenheit 9 / i#, a. Thought-provoking and critical documentary about the events which lured this country into. War.
TFAG and the Weinsteins' deception was first uncovered in or about November Iraq, Westside and TFAG agreed that:. Westside produced and distributed the film Fahrenheit 9 / i#, a. Thought-provoking and critical documentary about the events which lured this country into. War.
TFAG and the Weinsteins' deception was first uncovered in or about November Iraq, Westside and TFAG agreed that:. Westside produced and distributed the film Fahrenheit 9 / i#, a. Thought-provoking and critical documentary about the events which lured this country into. War.
DOY kenneth. Shoemaue
i
5
s
we a ae
10
uw
12
13
4
15
16
if
18
19
20
2
2
2B
24
28
26
2
Stanton L. Stein, Esq. (SBN: 45997)
Istein@lineriaw.com
Eaward Wein 9, (SBN: 145730 sompog FLED
eklein@linerlaw.com OF a
Daniel R. Gutenplan, Bsq. (SBN: 260412) STEEL SE ata
dgutenpl: linerlaw.com
LINER GRODE STEIN YANKELEVITZ A wv FEB 07 2011
SUNSHINE REGENSTREIF & TAYLOR LLP 1 Join. i, xe fect
1100 Glendon Avenue, 1éth Floor we By, we .
Los Angeles, California 90024-3503 "
Telephone: (310) 500-3500
Facsimile: (310) 500-3501
‘Attomeys for Plaintiff
Westside Productions, LLC, a Limited Liability Company
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
54501
WESTSIDE PRODUCTIONS, LLC, a Limited) BCA
Liability Company, )
Z ) COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF
Plaintiff, ) FIDUCIARY DUTY, CONSTRUCTIVE
) FRAUD, BREACH OF CONTRACT,
vs. } AND AN ACCOUNTING
THE FELLOWSHIP ADVENTURE GROUP, ) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
LLC, a Limited Liability Company; ROBERT =)
WEINSTEIN, an individual; HARVEY )
WEINSTEIN, an individual; and DOES 1 }
through 20, inclusive,
)
Defendant. )
Plaintiff Westside Productions, LLC, a Limited Liability Company (“Plaintiff” or
“Westside”) alleges, on information and belief, as follows:
INTRODUCTION
1, This case is about classic Hollywood accounting tricks and financial dé
ec
perpetrated by The Fellowship Adventure Group ("TFAG"), and its owners, be a
is
ores eae
"4 sata
BIT. Tosvpae £3EV0/8TS
‘roosecsbkOo
‘Weinstein (colletively the “Weinsteins”), against its partner Westside Productions, LLC
(Westside, the "loan out" company for acclaimed filmmaker Michael Moore. TFAG and
Westside are partners in a joint venture that produced and distributed the film Fahrenheit 9/1
28
thought-provoking and critical documentary about the events which lured this country i
COMPLAINT
cososanynasasneoive2Iraq, Westside and ‘TFAG agreed that: (a) Moore would write, direct and produce the film; (b)
TFAG would finance, sell and distribute the film; and (c) the profits would be shared equally
50/50. Although Westside and Moore delivered an award-winning film that achieved major box
office success, TFAG has failed and refused to share equally the fruits of the venture as the partners
had agreed.
2. As Westside's partner, agent and distributor, TFAG assumed fiduciary obligations
awe ow
toward Westside including, among others, the obligation to pay, and to properly account for,
‘Westside’s 50% share. As controlling members of TFAG, the Weinsteins too owed direct fiduciary |
duties to Westside. TFAG and the Weinsteins, however, breached those fiduciary duties and
10 | TFAG's obligations by failing to pay Westside its share, by using bogus accounting methods to
i
2
13
14
15
16
"7
18
19
20
21
hide the true amounts due Westside, and by secretly diverting monies owed Westside to TFAG and
the Weinsteins.
3, TRAG and the Weinsteins” deception was first uncovered in or about November
2008 through an audit commissioned by Westside, That audit (which was later augmented in 2010)
revealed highly irregular accounting practices including, among other things, charges to the
production for the cost of private jets to fly one of the Weinsteins and his assistant to Europe. It
‘was also revealed that ‘TFAG improperly and secretly used money belonging to the TFAG-
‘Westside venture to acquire TFAG's rights in the venture,
THE PARTIES
4. Plaintiff Westside is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a Limited Liability
Company in the business of loaning the services of Michael Moore, the iconic filmmaker known
22
2
24
for such notable films as Roger & Me, Bowling for Columbine, Sicko and Fahrenheit 9/11.
‘Westside is the successor-in-interest to Dog Eat Dog Films, Ine.
5. Defendant TFAG is, and at all times mentioned herein was, a Limited Liability
25
Company. As set forth herein, TFAG is the suecessor-in-interest to the rights, obligations and
responsibilities of Miramax Film Corp. and Icon Entertainment International with respect to certain
ar
28
agreements.
6. Defendant Robert Weinstein is an individual and a member of TFAG.
2 NO.
COMPLAINT -
pasoszerooasacoivonSe aesa
u
12
13
4
8
16
7
18
19
20
2
22
23
25
26
a
28
7. Defendant Harvey Weinstein is an individual and a member of TFAG.
8. Plaintiff's ignorant of the true names and capacities of the Defendants sued herein
as Does | through 20, inclusive, and therefore sues these Defendants by such fictitious names,
Plaintiff will amend this Complaint to allege their names and capacities when ascertained, Plaintiff|
5 | is informed and believes and, on that basis alleges, that each such fictitiously-named Defendant is
responsible in some manner for the damages alleged herein, and that Plaintiff's losses and damages
‘were proximately caused by such conduct,
9, tall times relevant herein, each of the Defendants was the agent, representative,
and/or employee of each of the remaining Defendants, and in doing the things hereinafter alleged,
‘vas acting within the course and scope of such relationship, and each of the Defendants approved
and ratified the conduct of the each of the remaining Defendants.
FACTS COMMON TO ALL CLAIMS
10, Inor about March 2003, Michael Moore (“Moore”) wrote a concept for a motion
picture entitled Fahrenheit 9/1] (the “Pictue”). Shortly thereafter Moore’s then loan out company,
Dog Eat Dog Films, Inc. (“Dog Eat Dog”) formed a joint venture with Icon Entertainment
Intemational (“Icon”) with respect to the Picture (the “Joint Venture”). Dog Bat Dog and Icon
‘memorialized the terms of the Joint Venture ina document entitled Sales Agency and Distribution
Deal Terms (the “Original Agreement”). That document set forth the basic terms pursuant to
]which the Joint Venture would sell and distribute the Picture, Among other things, Dog Eat Dog,
‘and Icon agreed that Dog Eat Dog would provide Moore’s services to write, direct and produce the
Picture and that Icon would act as Dog Eat Dog’s agent with respect to the distribution of the
Picture. Dog Eat Dog and Icon further agreed that, subject to the payment of various fees and
costs, Dog Eat Dog and Icon would split equally the profits derived from the Picture. The partners
also agreed that Icon would provide financial reports to Dog Eat Dog which had certain rights to
audit those reports.
11. Inor about April 2003, Jeon assigned all ofits rights under the Original Agreement
{to Miramax Film Corp. (“Miramax”), which assumed all of leon’s duties and obligations with
respect (othe Joint Venture. In or about May 2003, Dog Bat Dog and Miramax executed an
3 Case No.
COMPLAINT
305209017 as3co1vonagreement wherein, among other things, they acknowledged that Miramax had assumed all of
Tecon’s obligations with respect to the Joint Venture including all of Icon’s duties in the Original
‘Agreement, In or about May 2003, Dog Eat Dog assigned its rights and obligations in the Joint
Venture to Plaintiff Westside, In or about May 2004, Miramax assigned al of its rights and
obligations in the Joint Venture to defendant TFAG. Accordingly, as of June 2004, the parties to
the Joint Venture are TFAG and Westside.
12, ‘The pasties further agreed that revenues from worldwide sales of the film were to be
split 50/50 after payment to Westside of certain fixed compensation (including a $1 miltion
“producer Fee"), cash on cash recoupment of the budget by TFAG, and recoupment by TRAG of
“its fall permitted sales and distribution fees and recoupment of its ongoing sales and distribution
expenses.” Under their Agreement, TFAG assumed control over al of the incoming revenues and
the corresponding obligation to account for and ensure payment to Westside of its share. In|
connection with those payments, TFAG was required to deliver to Westside accurate and truthful
participation statements setting forth in appropriate detail, among other things, worldwide revenues
forthe film and permissible deductions and expenses.
13, As Westsde's partner in the Joint Venture, and as agent for Westside, TFAG
assumed fiduciary obligations to Westside, including among other things: (a) the duty to properly
account to Westside fr its 50% share in revenues; (b) the duty of full disclosure, including the duty}
{0 provide complete and accurate financial information; (c) the duty to refrain from self-dealing at
Westside's expense; (d) the duty of care; and (¢) the duty of loyalty
14, From the inception ofthe Original Agreement through the filing ofthis Complaint,
“TFAG breached and continues to breach the express and implied terms of the Agreement (and its
fiduciary duties) by, among other things, failing to pay Westside the full amount of its share of
compensation due, by issuing misleading and false participation statements, by failing to permit
Westside's auditors access to all relevant books and records, and by failing to properly account to
Westside
15. By way of example, Westside's auditors have discovered substantial irregularities in
the accounting for the film which have resulted in a gross underpayment to Westside and which
4 Cave No.
‘COMPLAINT
osnszsion ee CM-010
[Gatomner on ranre wig ATONE (rw, Sa cease o "Fon coun use OMY
piace maine ean
Liner Grode Stein Yankelevitz Sunshine Regenstelf & Taylor LLP
1100 Glendon Avenue, 14th Floor FILED
Los Argos, cAnoze eR TPE SEI
‘reuerHoneno: (310) 500-3500 axa, (310) 500-3501
comer, Poet
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FEB 07 ton
‘smmecraooness: 111 N. Hilf Street Join > Excentive OfficertClerk
‘MAILING ADDRESS: Same as above BY, Depary
errawoze cons: Los Angeles, CA 90012
sewouaue: Central District
‘CASE NAME Westside Productions, LLC v. The Fellowship Adventure Group,
LLG, et al.
| GWIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Cao Belgrave FH CAE ED |
BH Unlimited) Limited C494
(amount (amount C1 Counter [] Joinder —
demended demandedis | Fed with frst eppearance by defendant
exceeds $28,000) $25,000 or less) (Cal, Rules of Court, ula 3.402) oor:
‘Rems_1=6 Solow must be completed (see instructions on pags 2)
‘Check one box bolow for tho caso typo that best doscribes this case:
Auto Tort ‘Sontract Provisionaly Complex Civil Ligation
Ty Auto 22) ‘Breach of conlractvarranty (06) (Cal. Rules of Cour, rules 3.400-2.403)
\Uningured motors (46) Fle 9.740 cottons (09) ( Antirev Trade reputation (03)
‘Other PYPDIWD (Personal IuryProperty Other caitectons (09) 1 constwaton detect (10)
‘QomagerWrongful Death) Tort TE _Insurance coverage (18) Mass tort (40)
(Cy Ascesias (04) Other corvat (7) Seouties gon (28)
Resta Feet Property 1) Emirormona/ Tent ot (20)
Medical malpractice (46) ‘Eminent domalninverse (C1 tneurence coverage cfaims arising from the
TD _ otner euronv0 (za) ‘sendormation (14) abave Fisted provislonally compien case
Non-PUPDMD (Other Tor D1 Wrongtuevicton (33) typeo at)
Busines tonto busines pracive 07) C} ote rel property (26) Enforcement of Judgment
‘Gavi nights (08) ‘Untewtui Detainer Enforcement of judgment (20)
Oetaation (13) ‘Commerc (3) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint
Froud (16) Residential (22) Oricon
{otellecual property (19) C1 one (oe) (Cotter campteint not specified above) (42)
Proessloel negigena (25) Jules! Review isceltnoous Civ Petition
BQ omer non-PuPONVD tort (95) D rawo' Fortoture (05) 1 _Partnarship and corporate governance (21)
Employment () Pettion re: arbitration awerd (11) C) Otter petWon (rot specified above? (43)
(10 wrongtet termination (6) ‘Wit of mandate (02)
Loner es nt (18) Oia: jcc review (99)
Z thiscose [is Pais not complex under rule 3.400 of tie Galfornia Rulos of Court. I the ease ls complex, mark the
{aclots requiring exceptional udical managomont:
2. 1 Large number of separately represented parties d. [] Large number of witnesses.
». [1 Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel e. [) Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts
Issuos that wil bo tino-consuing to resava inother counties, stata, or counties, orn a federal court
. [1 Substantial amount of documentary evience —f.__[]_ Substantial postudgment judicial supervision
3, Remodiee sought (sheck al het apply): 2,02 monetary b. CI nonmonetary: declaratory or injunctive relief c. 5 punitive
4, Number of causes of action (specity: Four
5. Thiscase [] is BQ isnot aciass action suit.
6. tttnere are any known related eases, Me and serve a noice of rooted case, (You may use form CM015.)
Dete: February 7, 2011
Edward A. Klein >
REPT See oe AT TOOT,
NOTICE
f+ Pisnt must fie his caver sheet with the frst paper filed in the action or proceeding except small claims cases or cases fled
Under te Provele Code, Femi Code, or Wetare and Inston Code), (Ca Rules of Couto 3.20, Falre to fis may esut
‘sanctions.
ile this cover sheet adcitlon to any cover sheet required by toca court rule
# If this case is complex undar rue 3.400 et seq, of the Calfonia Rules of Cour, you must serve a copy ofthis cover sheet nal
other parties lo the acon or proceeding.
+ Unless this ise colectons case under rte 2.740 ora compex case, tis cover sheet wl be used for statistical purposes ony.
Bie tat
aE CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Thao wa ae TE
oan ee nem
¢’ OF -
@. ®. act
INSTRUBMIONS ON HOW TO COMPLETE THE COVER SHEET
‘To Plaintiffs and Others Filing First Papers. If you are fling a fist paper (for example, @ complain!) in a chill case, you must
‘complete and fte, slong with your first paper, the Civ Case Cover Sheet contained on page 1. This information vil be used to compe
‘statistics about the types and numbers of casas fled. You must complete items 1 through 6 on the sheet, In tem 4, you must check
‘one box for the case type that best describes the case, If he case fils both @ general and a more specific type of case listed in ern 4,
‘heck the more specific one. I the case has mulinle causes of acion, check tha Box that best indicaies the primary cause of action.
‘To ossist you in completing the sheat, examples of the casas thal belong under each case type in item 1 ere provided below. A cover
sheet must be fled only with your itil papar. Faure to Tle a cover sheet with the fst paper filed in a civil case may subject a party,
its counsel, or both to sanctions under rules 2.30 and 3.220 ofthe California Rules of Court
‘To Parties in Rule 3.740 Collactlons Gases, A “collections case" under rule 3.740 is defined as an action for recovery of money
wad in a sum salad to be certain that i ot more than $25,000, exclusive of interest and attorney's fees, erising from a transaction in
‘which property, services, or money wae acqsirad on credit. A collactons case dows not Include an action Geoking tha following: (1) fort
dameges, (2) punitive damages, (3) recovery of real propery, (4) recovery of personal property, or (6) @ prejudgment walt of
tachment. The idenifction of @ case as a rule 3,740 collections caso on Bis form means that it will be exempt from the general
timeorservice requicemenis and case management rules, unless a defendant fies a responsive pleading. A rule 3.740 collections
‘case will ba aubjet to the requirements for service and obiaining a judgment in rule 3.740.
‘To Partios in Complex Cases. In complex cases only, parties must also use the Civil Case Cover Sheet to designate whether the
case Is compléx. Ia plalntif believes the case Is complex undar cule 3.400 of the Califomia Rules of Cour, ths must be indicated by
Completing the appropriate boxes In items 1 and 2. 9 plaintiff designates o case as complex, the cover sheet must be served with the
complaint on all partes (0 the action. A defendant may fle and serve no later than the Ume of Is first eppearance a jolnder in the
plaintfts designation, a counter-designation that the cass not complex, oF, i the plant has made no designation, a dosignation that
the case is complex.
‘CASE TYPES ANO EXAMPLES.
= Auto Tort Contrset Provisionelly Complex Civil Lidgation (Cal.
“aulo(22)-Persona IjunyPropety Breach of ConvachWarronty (06) Rulon of Court Rules 3,400-8.409)
Darrage/Wrongil Death ‘reach of Reniataase “AntleusTrade Regulation (03)
‘Uninsured Mitr (46) 7 ine ‘Contact (rot unlawful aotiner CConstructon Betas (10)
‘case naive on vansured or wrong avon) ‘Gime tnvelvng Mass Tort (20)
‘motorist claim setject 0 ‘ConvaciWarranty Breach-Saller ‘Secures iteaton (28)
‘abit. check his lem Paint (aot aud or nagigence) Environment Toxic Tor (90)
‘stead of Rut) ‘Nogigent Breath of Contac Insuranes Coverage Claims
‘other PUBDIWD (Persenal injury Wananty (arsig rom provisional comptox
Property DamageMrongful Desth) ‘Omer Broan of ConracuWarrenty 50 pe Bstod above) (41)
Tort ‘Goneetons (6g, money owed, cpan Enforcement of Judgment
Asbestos (04) ook accounts) (08) ‘Enforcement of Judgment (20)
‘Asbesiox Property Damage Collection Coae-Soter Plott ‘Abstrac of Judgment (Out ot
Asbestos Personal niu tne Promissory NetICalectons County)
‘Wrongul Det ‘Case Confession of Judit (non
Product Labial (of aabestow ‘nauranes Gavorage (at provsonaly ‘domes reftions)
‘onlenvirenmanta) (24) ‘complen) (18), Sister Stata Judgment
‘MoctealMatpractce (45) ‘Auta Subrogation ‘Administrative Agency Award
‘edical Nalpracico- Otter Coverage “ot unpaid oxas)
Physidans & Surgeons ‘Othe Cont) ottonCaricaton of Ent of
‘Omar Professionl Health Care Contactal Fraud ‘Judgment on Ungaid Tass
Malractog Ger Contact Dispue ‘otra Enforcement oF Juspment
Othe PUPDIWID 23) Real Property case.
Preses Usb (0.9. ‘einen: Bomainiwverse ‘Wiscallaneous Chil Complaint
‘angel ‘Candermeton (4) fica (7)
Intentional Boy rjuy/POWD rong! Evin (33) ‘Other Complint (rot speciiad
He, assault, vandals) ‘Othar Real Property (eg, qua tv) (26) ‘apove) (2)
Intentenlinficon of ‘Writ of Possession of Real Proper Dedaraton Rel On
"Emosonal Disvoee Morigage Forecocure Injuneive Reef Only fron
eotgent tein of uit Tie arassmant)
molenal Ores ‘Qtrer Res! Property (nat aminant Mcranics Len
‘oher PID ‘domly, indloratenan, ‘Other Commereal Compeint
Nom-PuPDIVD (Other) Tort foreciasur) ‘Case ¢non rune.
‘Businese ToUntair Business Unigytul Detainee ‘Otner Ciull Complaint
Practice (O7) ‘Commercial (1) (
cua tga 9, dscsininaton, Reskiensl (32) : Miscoltangous Gil Petition
{alae ares) (otc Drugs (8) fitho cae involves ifloga! Partnership ane Corporate
Drasamea) (08) ‘rugs, obock this hom othenwise, ‘Governance (21)
Datarration (9, slnder, Re!) ‘pert as Commercial or Resident) ‘Ofer Petton (not specitod
(13) Judltal Review above} (4).
Freus (16) ae! Foie) Gu
Inteectual Property (18) Peston Re: Aroitalion Award (11) ‘Weorksiace Violonce
Professional Neaigence (25) Wit banda (0 Eloeribependent aut
‘al Mabracice ‘Wirtraarriistatve Mandamus ‘Abuse
4 SerPeteson! maprectce ‘Wekebrancamus on Utes Court. iecion Contest
i (pet meee or loge) ‘Case Matter Petiton fortame Chango
@_Otrer Nom-PYEDIND Tor (38) Wut Ota nts Coun Cate Patan er Rel Frome
im
‘ter Judit Ravaw (39) ‘thee Ct Potion
Review of Health Offcer Order
Noi of Aspeal-Labor
Germissiones Appeals
more ew ny 1.207 CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Prmeaa?
toe Farelantvot Tm
Westside Productions, LLC
GIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM AND
STATEMENT OF LOCATION
(CERTIFIGATE OF GROUNDS FOR ASSIGNMENT TO
COURTHOUSE LOCATION)
coca
$4 fp
aa
SPE OraeANeEL oS
FEB 07 2011
doa fie Eecae Or Cek
Br. Deno
“The form is requirod pursuant to LASC Local Rulo 2.0 in all now civil case filings in the Los Angeles Superior Court,
ter 1, Check the types of hearing and fil in the estimated length of hearing expected for this case:
vurvTr? (yes cassacnion?(] ves ummeocaser [ves
TMEESTWATEDFORTRIA,__§ CJ HOURS) 5) DAYS:
Nom Il, Select the corect district and courthouse location (4 steps — If you checked "Limited Case", skip to tiem II, Pg. 4):
Stop 4: Aftor frst completing the Civil Case Cover Sheet Form, find the main civil case cover sheet heading for your
case in the left margin below, and, to the right in Column A, the Civil Case Cover Sheet case type you selected.
‘Step 2: Check one Superior Court type of action in Column B below which best describes the nature ofthis case.
‘Step 3: In Column C, circie the reason for the court location choice th
at applies to the type of action you have checked.
Fog any exception to the court location, see Los Angeles Supertor Court Local Rule 2.0,
Applicable Reasons for Choosing Courthouse Location (see Column C below)
4. Cass Aetons must be edn to Stoney Mosk Courhouee, Chal Dave 6, Lecalon of propery or pemanenty garaged vob.
Z Maybo eg in Cont! (Sher eouny. orf 80d) iuryOropeny Damage) 7. Locabon where petoner ese.
5. Uetatonwiere caus of sclon aa. 3 Locaun unaen cetendontrossondentunclons whol.
4: Loom wre body ny. cea of Sorage cures Locator vier ono ere he parte ete.
4 {SSzton Yor petomance raged or dence 10, locaton aber Commasiner Of.
‘Step 4: Fill in the information requested on page 4 in ttem Ill; complete Item IV. Sign the decteration.
A B c. |
| Coa core steet ype al Acton ‘opleaie Reason
z Giopoy he {hack ony on) Boo Stop 3 above
3 ‘Auto (22) 11.A7100. Motor Vehicio - Petzanal inuryiProparty DamageWrangtul Daan | 1.2.4
‘Uningured Motorist (46) | [7] 7110 Personal injury/Property DamageMWrongtul Death - Uninsured Motorist | 1., 2. 4.
Di A0070 asbestos Property Damage 2
‘Aabesion
zs (09 | raat asesee Personal loon Doth 2
& | tence D1 Ar2t0 Prodvet Lilly (rol eseste or txcervronmental) Td
&
22 | wocanaeace ay 1D 7210 Modtat Malpractice Physicians & Surgeons 1.24
3 Aves one Prtestons Heath Caro Mabracboo 1.2.4
Ai pn 1D A7260 Premises Lisbty (99. sp and fat) eae
See erserattonry | [I] A7290 itaonal Body iy Property DanagaMronfu Death (0.0. i
as Property Damage csseut, vandalism, eta) a
pe” eet C1 a7270 imentional inticton of Emotional Disess. 2.8
4 TZ ar2zo oMerPerona nin ropey Oamagarrong Death 1.2
THEW 9 ev. 0977) CIVIL CASE GOVER SHEET ADDENDUM TASC. 120
usc Dan a-o+ AND STATEMENT OF LOCATION Fage 1of4‘ont ree ‘SE RIMBER
‘Westside Productions, LLC v. The Fellowship Adventure Group, LLC, at al
A B" c
Ci Cas Cover Set Type of Action Agplcabie Reasons -
atogry No (Chrck ery on0) Soo Stop 3 Above
5
3 usinss You 07) | EL At029 Oar ormrcavGusines Tor ret faudbreah oteontoc) | 1.208
2
ai Carigns @s) |. A6008 ci Rlmstsednasen 1.203
2B Detanaton 12) | [A800 Patan (andetoay 4.2.8
a
3 Fr (18) Dasors ava (no conta) 1.2.3,
& z PE
58 y As017 Legal salpractice 12.3,
ZG | Protassiona: Neaiaence (25) |) cog omor Professional Malpractice (not medical or legal) $a 2d
‘te (2) Ci reves omer Non PeronaliuryPropry Demag tot 2a
a
engl Teriaton 8) |] ASOT Wong Teaten 188
a2 Oner Erploment Compt Case
=z Otnar Employment (15) o if Tere ec
Aste Later Conmison: Apes 1
[a a
C1 8004 Breach of Ronta}'Laasa Contract not Untewtul Detaingr oF wronghal
‘eveton) hea
Breech of Conuacy waranty | F) aeons conraciWarenty Breach Seller Platt no faudinogtgence) a
(rot insurance) D1 A0019 Negligent Breach of ContaeyWvarrany (no fraud) 128,
C1 As028 otver Sroach of Contaciarany (not fraud or rogigonce) 14.245,
i aa 6002 cotectons Case-Sauer Pani 2,9,6.
g LZ. A6012 omer Promissory Nove/Colectons Case 2,8,
Insurance Coverage (18) | [7] 48018 Insixance Coverage (not ovmplex)
(D1 As008 contractual Fraud
tree Convact (37) |Z) A803¢ TortiousInerterence
1 asczr citer contact Diputenot reacrneurancattaudinanigance)
Emaar Domalninwe=” 11) a7g00 EmlnentDomainCondemation __ Number of parca 2
irongtul Everton (83) | (7) A023 Wrongtul Evicton Case 26
Real Property
‘Ober eat Peper (28)
(C1 As018 Mortgage Foreciosurs
Dacose cuit ie
C1 As0e0 other Real Property (not eminem domain, landiordftenant, foreclosure)
‘Unio Detabor-Comnmeroel
: i ( s00et Lowel OvanerCommeraa rtengscrwmenalenetmny —— [2.6
i | Dose Oeag tases |) sare nanometer ou wor on) 2.8.
[3 RP [Ooertmnaoreroene ne
4 [unos oauine-Oroe ao» |] A602 unto Dtsiner Orage 28
REIT ee CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM TASC, rte 25
tase ort onae ee
AND STATEMENT OF LOGATION7 ——®-_
Serr me “aaeianeen
Westside Productions, LLC v. The Fellowship Adventure Group, LLC, ot al. l
A 8 c
‘out case Cover eet ‘ype of Acton ‘Appleabia Reasons
Category No. {checs oly no) See Sep 3 Above
2 ‘eset Frere (5) |[-] ABtO8 Asset Frere Case 28
z Petiion re Arsixaton (11) |] a8115 Peuton to Compeltcenimyvacate Arbitration 25
3 (C1 Ast5s wt Amine Mandar 20
3 2 asts2 wit-Mancanue on Ute Coun Cato Maree 2
Wt of andate 02)
C1 esse wt Ofer Unite Cour Case Review 2
nner sud Review (8) |] AB180 Ober Writtle Reon 2.8.
AnttrustTrade Reguiason (03) | (_) A6003 Antinus/Trade Regulation 142,
1 [ cenanccn onto 0) | at0or csr cote 1.2.8
3
i Ginsmehing mors Yer 177 psn06 Cals mote Mase Tot ae
; Secures itgaton (28) |] n5095 Secures Litgaton Case 1.2.8
i ETO ng, | C] A5086 Tone Towendronmena 4.2.8,
lance Compce Cine | gear igurnce Covergeuapton (compen ar ony) 442.54
D1 aAst41 Sister State Xdgmant 2.8
a Cy aateo Absracte torent 2.6
5s
ge ast D1 Aat07 Confession of Judgment (nom-domestic relations) 2.8
ES | Seteemen, | ans adninstahe Agency a vga ss)
5s Di sett Pesicnicoieat fr Entry ofutoment on Unga Tax
Ty site omer Entorcementof Judgment Case
oe Rico (er) D1 At0a9 Racketwerng (RIGO) CaBe. 1,2,
ga D1 A8030 Decaratory Refit Oni “
as ae e 1 Aaoso njuncave Reset Onty (rot comesticharassment) 2.0,
Ey | oe RRRET | 008 ote coment oct oie 28
Fi 8000 other Civit Complaint (non-torinon-complx) 442.8,
anne Copsaton 17] serigraphed Copa Gomer Cane 2a
(Cl 6121 Gri Harassment
a2 8128 Worgace Harassment
Be ner pe viaitueasai aamauise ee
ge (Not Speattee Above) |] A61G0 Elecien Contoet 2
Fe en C1 Ast10 Pettion or Change of Nara 2,7,
$ astro patton or Ret tom Lat Cn Law 2.9.48
: Ty acto orc etn 28
eg
TAG 108 ev. FT) CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM ASE, ale
Lasc Detc3.08 Pape 9 of 4
AND STATEMENT OF LOCATION
Saree @iiss e @ ate '
Westside Productions, LUC v. The Fellowship Adventure Group, LLC,
tom I, Statement of Location: Enter the address ofthe accident, paty® residence oF place of business, performance, or other
‘eteumstance indicated in tle IL, Step 3 cn Page 1. asthe proper reason for fing in the court location you selected,
REASON CHECK THE NUMBER UNDER COWUMNG [rouse
WHICH APPLIES IN THIS CASE 111N. Hill Street
01.8203.04.050607.08.09.010
Los Angeles cA | so0r2 |
tem IV, Decteraton of Assignment: | dectare under pensity of perjury under the laws ofthe State of Calfomia that the foregoing Is tuo
‘and correct and that the above-entited matter is properly fled for assignment tothe __Stanloy Mosk __ courthouse inthe
Genvet istrict of tha Los Angeles Superior Court [Code Ci. Proc.,§ 392 et seq., and LASC Local Rule 2.0, subds.
(). (0) ane (6)
Dated; February 7, 2014 —L- 2,
Bonita wirna HRT
Eoward A. Klein
PLEASE HAVE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS COMPLETED AND READY TO BE FILED IN ORDER TO
PROPERLY COMMENCE YOUR NEW COURT CASE:
1. Original Comptaint or Petition,
If fling @ Complaint, a completed Summons form for issuance by the Clerk
Givi Case Cover Sheet form CM-010.
Complete Addendum to Civil Case Cover Sheet form LASC Approved CIV 109 (Rev. 01/07).
Payment in full ofthe filing foe, unless fees have been waived.
‘Signed order appointing the Guardian ad Litem, JIC form FL-936, if the plaintiff or petitioner is a minor under 18
years of age, oF if aquired by Court,
7. Additional copies of documents to bo conformed by the Clerk. Copias of the cover sheet and this addendum
‘must be served along with the summons and complaint, or other initiating pleading in the case,
eesen
g
8
THEW TH or TY CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM ASC. ralo 20
Lasc Dra 0-04 AND STATEMENT OF LOCATION Page 4 ol
(Racca
eeetoeatatonsnSUMMONS: FR COURT USE OMY
(CITACION JUDICIAL) “FILED”
NOTICE TO DEFENDAN’ ‘SUPERIOR COURT OF ¢
(AVISO AL DEMANDADO): CONN OLS RUES
THE FELLOWSHIP ADVENTURE GROUP, LLC, a Limited Libity Company: FEB 07 2011
ROBERT WEINSTEIN, an individual; HARVEY WEINSTEIN, an individu
DOES # through 20, inclusive Join. Pie, Sxcexve Ofer
YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF: By, @ Depay
(0 ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE):
WESTSIDE PRODUCTIONS, LLC, a Limited Liability Company
NOTICE! You have been avec. The cout ay decte eganst you wihout you being heard unless you respond win 30 days, Read ta hfornalon
rere ae ch esl equirenen Yu ey van ta cal an atomey rah way iy dort know an aoe, you may wan cl nat
ural sae yo cavot fore an ator you ty beef egal sowens hen operate ceseeee oven an
ina nna rune at Bo Cates Legal Sevoes Wey she rine the Gatos Coss onkes Bethe ones,
(cui ages aby etic yout eal eau occa aceecuton NOTE: The ea ea eee ston aed
ison ary ellen cr arian svar of $10}00 rove a ai case. The Guts in repos Does ol ee eos
{AvI80 Lean demanded. Sime responds deo co 3 es, Gots pus aaron sont an Stcher ea Looks eae
‘Staci
ene 30 Oks DE CALENDARIO dnt de use ntequn sn ean pple gue pare presnarune puss po eso on ota
There ad acs tw on eae,
(Elombrayaacetén dla cone es): =
Los Angeles Superior Court, Central District BC45450]
‘1141. Hil Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
‘Ths namo, address, and telephone numberof plinifs atomey, or plaintiff without an attomey, is:
(E/nombre, la drecclén y of nomero de telson de! abogado del aemandanto, o del demandanite que no tiene ebogado, 65)
‘Stanton L. Stein (SBN 45997), Edward A, Klein (SBN: 145736), Danial R. Gutenplan (SBN 260812)
Liner Grode Stein Yankelevitz Sunshine if & Taylor LLP
1100 Glendon Avenue, 14th Floor, Los Ang ee (310) 500-3500
ate ‘ bY fo _ Deputy
ifecra) FEB 07-2011 ‘adunty
(Forp ca ofthis summons, use Proof of Service of Summons (
rng de esta citation use el formuario Proof of Sorvieo of Sum
NOTICE TO THE PERSON SERVED: You are served
1. Clasan individual dofendant,
2, [asthe person sued under the fcthious namo of (specify):
3. Clon behat ot spect):
under, [] CGP 416.10 (corporation) Dicer 416.60 ¢inor)
CCP 446.20 (dafunct corporation) cop 416.70 (consorvatoo)
CCP 448.40 (association or porrership) _ [] GCP 416.90 (authorized person)
D other (specity):
4. Dy porsnal delve on fat)
rags
Fama a aay oe SUMMONS Ta] Coma ware a2 at
sie Rec yam rome er So nosso
Complaint For Violation of The One Action Rule, Violation of Rosenthal Act, Wrongful Foreclosure, Conversion, Fraud, Misrepresentation, Unfair Business Practices
Law School Survival Guide (Volume I of II) - Outlines and Case Summaries for Torts, Civil Procedure, Property, Contracts & Sales: Law School Survival Guides