Republic of the Philippines

REGIONAL TRIAL COURT

10th Judicial Region
Branch 69
Cagayan de Oro City

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,

Plaintiff, CRIM. CASE NO. 08282
NPS NO.X-06-INV-010A-
0037

-Versus-

For: ESTAFA THRU

FALSIFICATION
OF PUBLIC DOCUMENT
APIPA G. GURO,
Accused,
/
***********************************************************************
******************/
INFORMATION
The undersigned Associate Prosecution Attorney II accuses Apipa
G. Guro of the crime of Estafa thru Falsification of Public Document,
defined and penalized under Article 315, paragraph 2, in relation to
Article 172 and Article 48 of the Revised Penal Code, committed as
follows:

That on October 31, 2007 in the City of Cagayan de Oro,

Philippines, and within the jurisdiction of the Honorable Court,
accused Apipa G. Guro [hereinafter “Accused”] misrepresenting
herself to be Doña Añiqa Macarambon-Bacsarpa, applied for a loan
with South Bank in the amount of PhP 5,000,000.00. A parcel of land
located at Balulang, Cagayan de Oro City, covered by Certificate of
Title No. T-178439, in the name of Don Mario Bacsarpa married to
Doña Añiqa Macarambon-Bacsarpa was then offered by the accused
as collateral. The accused did then and there wilfully, unlawfully, and
feloniously falsify the deed of real estate mortgage and the
promissory note corresponding to the said loan by forging their
signatures when in truth and in fact they did not so participate, to the
damage and prejudice of the complaining bank and the Spouses
Bacsarpas in the aforesaid sum of PhP 5,000,000.00.

Contrary to law.
Cagayan de Oro City, July 19, 2010

AZRIFA A. MAMUTUK
Associate Prosecution
Attoryney II

Approved:

JOANNE N. VELEZ
City Prosecutor

BAILBOND REOCMMENDED: PHP 100,000.00

WITNESSES:

1. Vincy Jane A. Polinar – c/o South Bank, Kausawagan, Cagayan

de Oro City
2. And others.

CERTIFICATION

This is to certify that as shown by the records the undersigned,

an authorized officer, that there is a reasonable ground to believe that
a crime has been committed and that the accused is probably guilty
thereof; that the accused was informed of the complaint and of the
evidence submitted against her and was given an opportunity to
submit controverting evidence.

AZRIFA A. MAMUTUK
Associate Prosecution
Attorney II

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this July 19, 2010 in

the City of Cagayan de Oro, Philippines.