Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prepared for
Prepared by
Omaer Ahmad [ZR-09] Gaus Samdani [RQ-12] Kawsar Ahmad [ZR-50] Rafaat Wasik Ahmed [ZR-53] Nasim Ul Haque [ZR-54] Rashed Al Ahmad Tarique[ZR-61]
Date Of Submission:
Page 1
CONTENTS
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Effects and changes in business due to Climate change ........................................................................ 5 Regulatory exposure ............................................................................................................................ 5 Automobiles: ................................................................................................................................... 5 Transport: ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Utilities: ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Integrated oil and gas ...................................................................................................................... 5 Competitive exposure .......................................................................................................................... 5 Automobiles: ................................................................................................................................... 6 Utilities: ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Integrated oil and gas ...................................................................................................................... 6 Technology: ..................................................................................................................................... 6 New technological and business opportunities..................................................................................... 6 Automobiles .................................................................................................................................... 6 Utilities: ........................................................................................................................................... 6 International Summits on Environment and Their Outcomes ................................................................... 7 Supply and Demand: The Market Mechanism .......................................................................................... 9 How are prices set? (The supply and demand model) ........................................................................... 9 Demand ............................................................................................................................................... 9 Demand schedule and Demand Curve .................................................................................................. 9 Shifts in the Demand Curve ................................................................................................................ 10 Supply................................................................................................................................................ 10 Shifts in the Supply Curve................................................................................................................... 10 The market and equilibrium pricing ....................................................................................................... 11 Economics Basics: Monopolies, Oligopolies and Perfect Competition .................................................... 11 Externalities .......................................................................................................................................... 12 Tragedy of the Commons ................................................................................................................... 13 Internalization of Externalities ............................................................................................................... 13 Pigovian Taxation ............................................................................................................................... 13 Coase Theorem .................................................................................................................................. 14
Page 2
Definition:.......................................................................................................................................... 14 Calculation of Negative Externalities...................................................................................................... 15 Carbon Footprint ............................................................................................................................... 15 Calculation Standard and Procedure .................................................................................................. 15 Organizational Footprints .............................................................................................................. 16 Product Footprints ......................................................................................................................... 16 Carbon Emissions Trading .................................................................................................................. 16 Sustainability and Sustainable Development.......................................................................................... 17 Transformation to a Sustainable business model................................................................................ 18 Greenwashing ....................................................................................................................................... 18 7 Sins of Greenwashing ...................................................................................................................... 19 1. Sin of the Hidden Trade-off ............................................................................................................ 19 2. Sin of No Proof: .............................................................................................................................. 19 3. Sin of Vagueness: ........................................................................................................................... 19 4. Sin of Irrelevance: .......................................................................................................................... 19 5. Sin of Lesser of Two Evils: ............................................................................................................... 19 6. Sin of Fibbing: ................................................................................................................................ 19 7. The Sin of Worshiping False Labels: ................................................................................................ 19 Frameworks for developing a sustainable business ................................................................................ 19 The Natural Step Framework ............................................................................................................. 19 Strategic planning using The Natural Step framework ..................................................................... 20 The Sustainable Value Framework ..................................................................................................... 21 Creating sustainable value .............................................................................................................. 21 Assessing Your Organizations Sustainable Value Portfolio .............................................................. 23 International Institute for Sustainable Development Model ............................................................... 23 Small business and private company considerations .......................................................................... 25 Clean Development Mechanism ............................................................................................................ 25 Difficulties with the CDM ................................................................................................................... 27 Major Environmental and Related Laws of Bangladesh .......................................................................... 28 The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1989 ............................................................................................... 28 The Smoke Nuisance Act, 1905 .......................................................................................................... 28 Environmental Conservation Act (ECA) 1995 ...................................................................................... 28
Page 3
Environment Conservation Rules (ECR) 1997...................................................................................... 28 International laws .............................................................................................................................. 28 Organizing principles.......................................................................................................................... 29 INTERNATIONAL TREATIES A short list of international treaties pertaining to the environment is described below: ............................................................................................................................ 29 Incentives for companies turning green ................................................................................................. 29 Cost savings ....................................................................................................................................... 29 Enforcement ...................................................................................................................................... 29 Competitive advantage ...................................................................................................................... 30 Companies unwilling to Voluntary GHG reduction: ............................................................................. 30 List of Sources ....................................................................................................................................... 31
Page 4
INTRODUCTION
EFFECTS AND CHANGES IN BUSINESS DUE TO CLIMATE CHANGE
Regions, sectors, and firms, may be impacted through various domains of influence: Regulatory exposure from national and international policies and regulation designed to reduce greenhouse gases emissions; Competitive exposure from a rise in the costs of energy-intensive processes, and a decline in demand for energy-intensive products; New technological and business opportunities resulting from increased demand for low-carbon, high efficiency goods and services.
REGULATORY EXPOSURE
While many within the business community dislike the Kyoto Protocol, viewing it as a suboptimal mechanism for bringing about a business solution to this problem, policy-makers have created what businesses dislike even more uncertainty. Companies need a clear picture of future market environments in order to make strategic decisions. AUTOMOBILES : Car makers are subject to various external regulations, especially in Europe, including: the implementation scheme of the European directive on the trading of greenhouse gas emissions quotas; labeling regulations pursuant to the CO2 directive; tax policies; and green purchasing by public authorities and large corporations. In March 2006, China enacted a 20% tax on large cars in an effort to decrease the demand for those polluting vehicles. TRANSPORT : Airlines would be brought in under an October 2005 European Commission proposal to cap CO2emissions for all aircraft departing from EU airports. This provides for airlines to trade their potential surplus credits on the European Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS).. Emissions from flights within the EU would be included from 2011 and emissions from all flights to and from EU airports from 2012. Assuming airlines fully pass on any extra costs to customers, by 2020 the price of a return flight within the EU could rise between 1.8 and 9. The price of long-haul trips could increase more depending on the journey length as a result of higher environmental impact. UTILITIES: Greenhouse gas regulation presents an immediate financial charge on utilities, as companies are obliged to reduce output, switch fuel sources, invest in new technologies, or purchase carbon credits to reduce their exposure. In Europe, energy activities are covered by the EU ETS, pursuant to which power stations are required to have a permit for each tone of CO2 emitted. In China, while the current regulations focus more on the reduction of SO2 emissions, it is likely that regulations on CO2 emissions will follow. INTEGRATED OIL AND GAS: Because of uncertainties surrounding the future of greenhouse gas legislation and regulation, particularly taxation, industry leaders are allocating more resources to Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects, which are the most viable mechanism for complying with current and likely future regulation. Repsol YPF has invested over $14m in CDM projects that involve energy efficiency, renewable energy, and fuel switching in developing countries.
COMPETITIVE EXPOSURE
As regulation imposes an additional cost on carbon-intensive products, consumers can be expected to shift demand towards less energy- and carbon-intensive products, bringing both commercial challenges
Page 5
and commercial opportunities. These two competitive exposure sides stand to affect particularly the automobile, utilities, integrated oil and gas, mining, and technology sectors. AUTOMOBILES : More stringent fuel economy standards are likely to divert consumer demand towards smaller and more fuel efficient cars. Because Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) product mixes differ with respect to carbon intensity standards, average OEM costs per vehicle to meet new carbon constraints could differ by a factor of 25. UTILITIES: Prices of the fuels used to generate electricity are particularly important to this industry. If the price of electricity is increased by emission regulations, this will be largely passed on to consumers because the industry typically operates with small profit margins. Because coal is more greenhouse gasintensive than other fuels, the price of electricity generated from coal may increase particularly. Consumers may then switch to cleaner generators. INTEGRATED OIL AND GAS: Increases in costs resulting from higher energy prices, especially downstream and in chemicals, may put downward pressure on the sectors profits. Because natural gas emits relatively little CO2 when it is burned, demand for this energy source is projected to increase under more stringent greenhouse gas regulations. Should the price become prohibitively high for consumers, it will accelerate demand for newer technologies. TECHNOLOGY: Consumer awareness is likely to lead to a positive effect on some technology sectors. Particular opportunities may well be created for the telecommunications sector, which has the potential, through improvements in communication over distance and time, to enable interlocutors to meet face to face without their having to use cars or other modes of transport. A similar argument applies to the software sector, to the extent that information technology provides connectivity without the need for physical travel.
Page 6
offset their carbon emissions. It has what it calls a warehouse of technology and forestry carbon offset projects into which would-be off setters can buy and thereby obtain CO2 absolution.
Climate Change Strategy: The Business Logic behind Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Reductions by Andrew J. Hoffman The Business of Climate Change Challenges and Opportunities by John Llewellyn Down to Business on Climate Change An Overview of Corporate Strategies by Seth Dunn
Page 7
Furthermore, developing countries too were to reduce emissions ultimately, but in a different way. The rich were to help provide means for the developing world to transition to cleaner technologies while moving along the path of development. The Convention provides a framework to tackle a number of issues and had some objectives set, including the following: Recognize that a problem exists. As a result, the ultimate objective is to achieve stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. Continued scientific research is encouraged because the climate is a very complex issue and patterns are likely to continue changing. The Convention recognizes that the current developed and industrialized nations have the largest current and historic emissions and that they should therefore take the lead and burden of helping reduce harmful effects and cut down emissions. This is significant, as it recognizes the right for developing countries to develop economically. The Convention also recognized that it is likely that the poorer nations will suffer the most, as there are less resources and capabilities to adapt to sudden changes of this magnitude. It is also recognized that a more sustainable economy is needed as current consumptive patterns could be destructive. The following table includes the more important COPs and the achievements of these conferences: Event Date and place Principal achievements
Broad international scientific consensus that human actions are influencing the climate
UN Framework Convention 1992, Rio de Janeiro, Committed the global community to stabilizing the level of on Climate Change Brazil. (Entered into greenhouse gases in the atmosphere force 1994) Recognized the primary responsibility of industrialized countries, and the differentiated responsibilities of developing countries IPCC - Second report 1995 Confirmed human influence on climate Stated that risk from climate change is severe enough to justify preventive actions (Governments which have signed the Convention have to accept the findings of the IPCC). Berlin, Established budget, secretariat and institutional mechanisms Established pilot phase of "Activities Implemented Jointly" to reduce greenhouse gas emissions Agreed timetable for setting specific reduction targets for industrialized countries Agreed the Kyoto Protocol which Outlined the greenhouse gas emissions reduction obligation for Annex I countries
Conference of Parties (COP) 2000, The Hague, Negotiations over major political issues were held 6 The Netherlands Consequences for failure to meet emission reduction targets were discussed Most of the EU countries rejected the compromise position proposed
Page 8
Event
Principal achievements
by the US and some other EU countries
Bonn, Agreements were made on Flexible mechanisms Carbon sinks Compliance Financing The parties agreed to use the Adaptation Fund established at COP7 for: Supporting developing countries better adapt to climate change Capacity-building through technology transfer
2007, Indonesia
Bali, Agreement on a timeline and structured negotiation on the post-2012 framework was achieved with the adoption of the Bali Action Plan
2009, Copenhagen, Unsuccessfully tried to establish an ambitious global climate Denmark agreement for the period from 2012 when the first commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol expires.
DEMAND
In economics, demand is the desire to own anything and the ability to pay for it and willingness to pay. The term demand signifies the ability or the willingness to buy a particular commodity at a given point of time.
Page 9
Quantity = a - (b x Price),where a and b are constants that must be determined for each particular demand curve. When price changes, the result is a change in quantity demanded as one moves along the demand curve.
SUPPLY
Supply is the amount of some product producers is willing and able to sell at a given price all other factors being held constant. Usually, supply is plotted as a supply curve showing the relationship of price to the amount of product businesses are willing to sell. A supply schedule is a table which shows how much one or more firms will be willing to supply at particular prices. The supply schedule shows the quantity of goods that a supplier would be willing and able to sell at specific prices under the existing circumstances. Some of the more important factors affecting supply are the goods own price, the price of related goods, production costs, technology and expectations of sellers. As with the demand curve, the convention of the supply curve is to display quantity supplied on the xaxis as the independent variable and price on the yaxis as the dependent variable. The law of supply states that the higher the price, the larger the quantity supplied, all other things constant. The law of supply is demonstrated by the upward slope of the supply curve. As with the demand curve, the supply curve often is approximated as a straight line to simplify analysis. A straight-line supply function would have the following structure: Quantity = a + (b x Price) where a and b are constant for each supply curve. A change in price results in a change in quantity supplied and represents movement along the supply curve. SHIFTS IN THE SUPPLY CURVE While changes in price result in movement along the supply curve, changes in other relevant factors cause a shift in supply, that is, a shift of the supply curve to the left or right. Such a shift results in a change in
Page 10
quantity supplied for a given price level. If the change causes an increase in the quantity supplied at each price, the supply curve would shift to the right.
Page 11
Examples
Farmer
Automotive manufacturer
Power Company
EXTERNALITIES
An externality (or transaction spillover) is a cost or benefit, not transmitted through prices, incurred by a party who did not agree to the action causing the cost or benefit. A benefit in this case is called a positive externality or external benefit, while a cost is called a negative externality or external cost. 1 A situation in which the private costs or benefits to the producers or purchasers of a good or service differs from the total social costs or benefits, which include the private as well as third party costs and benefits, entailed in its production and consumption. An externality exists whenever one individual's actions affect the well-being of another individual -- whether for the better or for the worse -- in ways that need not be paid for according to the existing definition of property rights in the society. Externalities of either the "positive" or the "negative" sort create a problem for the effective functioning of the market to maximize the total utility of the society. The "external" portions of the costs and benefits of producing a good will not be factored into its supply and demand functions because rational profitmaximizing buyers and sellers do not take into account costs and benefits they do not have to bear. Hence a portion of the costs or benefits will not be reflected in determining the market equilibrium prices and quantities of the good involved. Using a typical supply and demand curve this can be shown as: Externalities of either the "positive" or the "negative" sort create a problem for the effective functioning of the market to maximize the total utility of the society. The "external" portions of the costs and benefits of producing a good will not be factored into its supply and demand functions because rational profitmaximizing buyers and sellers do not take into account costs and benefits they do not have to bear. Hence
a portion of the costs or benefits will not be reflected in determining the market equilibrium prices and quantities of the good involved. Using a typical supply and demand curve this can be shown as:
Page 12
The price of the good or service producing the externality will tend toward equality with the marginal personal cost to the producer and the marginal personal utility to the purchaser, rather than toward equality with the marginal social cost of production and the marginal social utility of consumption. Thus, normal market incentives for the buyer and seller to maximize their personal utilities will lead to the overor under-production of the commodity in question from the point of view of society as a whole, not the socially optimal level of production. Goods involving a positive externality will be "underproduced" from the point of view of society as a whole, while goods involving a negative externality will be "overproduced" from the point of view of society as a whole. In our example above, the individual homeowner pays all the cost of sprucing up his home but realizes only part of the benefits created -- so consequently each homeowner will probably not keep his house up as well as he otherwise might if his neighbors could somehow be induced or required to pay him something for their share of the benefits from his labors. A third type of externality is known as positional externality. Positional externalities refer to a special type of externality that depends on the relative rankings of actors in a situation. Because every actor is attempting to "one up" other actors, the consequences are unintended and economically inefficient.
INTERNALIZATION OF EXTERNALITIES
There are two wide-known approaches to internalization of externalities 1. Centralized Approach; 2. Decentralized Approach (Free Market Operation). To better understand them, we should first look into the theoretical base of these approaches. In the following two sections we will examine Pigovian Taxation and Coase Theorem, the theoretical bases for both the approaches. PIGOVIAN TAXATION A Pigovian tax (also sometimes spelled Pigouvian Tax) is a tax levied to correct negative externalities of a market activity. It is considered as one of the traditional means of bringing about market efficiency in economic situations where externality problem exits. The diagram illustrates the working of a Pigovian tax. A tax shifts the marginal private cost curve up by the amount of the tax. Faced with this cost increase, the producers have an incentive to reduce output to the socially optimum level. This is done by reducing the marginal externality to the marginal tax. The total tax revenue (which could be used to mitigate the effect of the
Page 13
negative externality) is equal to the size of the tax times the new output (the shaded area). As illustrated above the, amount of Pivogian tax to be levied has to be equal to the amount of negative externalities exerted. However, since there is no strict method of calculating negative externalities, the very calculation of Pigovian tax remains questionable. Political factors such as lobbying of government by polluters may also tend to reduce the level of the tax levied, which will tend to reduce the mitigating effect of the tax; lobbying of government by special interests who calculate the negative utility of the externality higher than others may also tend to increase the level of the tax levied, which will tend to result in a sub-optimal level of production. In fact this "knowledge problem" regarding externalities was mention in the very essay of Pigou titled "Some Aspects of the Welfare State" (1954), where he writes, "It must be confessed, however, that we seldom know enough to decide in what fields and to what extent the State, on account of [the gaps between private and public costs] could interfere with individual choice." In other words, the economist's blackboard "model" assumes knowledge we don't possess it's a model with assumed "givens" which are in fact not given to anyone. Despite of all these shortcomings, Pigovian taxes increase the fairness of how costs of negative externalities are borne. Even if the amount of such a tax is not at the perfect level to achieve optimal efficiency, it transfers cost associated with the negative externality (eg pollution) from the public to the polluter. It must be noted that all Ecotax are based on this principle.
COASE THEOREM
In law and economics, the Coase theorem, attributed to Ronald Coase, describes the economic efficiency of an economic allocation or outcome in the presence of externalities. This theorem, along with his 1937 paper on the nature of the firm (which also emphasizes the role of transaction costs), earned Coase the 1991 Nobel Prize in Economics. The Coase theorem is an important basis for most modern economic analyses of government regulation, especially in the case of externalities. George Stigler summarized the resolution of the externality problem in the absence of transaction costs in a 1966 economics textbook in terms of private and social cost, and for the first time called it a "theorem."
DEFINITION:
The Coase Theorem states that if private parties can bargain without cost over the allocation of resources, then the private market will always solve the problem of externalities on its own regardless of who (i.e., polluter or victims) owns the property rights. The socially efficient quantity is attained regardless of whom the property rights were initially assigned. In practice, obstacles to bargaining or poorly defined property rights can prevent Coasian bargaining. Assumptions: Given distribution of wealth and income Complete Information No Transaction Costs Clear Property Rights Problems: Wealth Effect Free-Rider Hold-out Cost to Obtain Information Negotiation Costs Default Ownership
Page 14
Since the Coase theorem asserts that under perfect competition private and social costs will be equal, so only the marginal social cost curve is used taking into account the negative externalities. There can be two possible cases of solutions: One where the steel company has the property rights, another where the community has the property rights.
CARBON FOOTPRINT
A carbon footprint is a representation of the effect human activities have on the climate in terms of the total amount of greenhouse gases produced (measured in units of carbon dioxide). Different types of carbon footprint: 1. Individual footprints 2. Organizational footprints 3. Event footprints 4. Product footprints The scope of the presentation limits the types of carbon foot printing to only the organizational footprints and the product footprints.
Page 15
The Global Warming Potential (GWP), as defined in the GHG Protocol, is a factor describing the radiative forcing impact (degree of harm to the atmosphere) of one unit of a given GHG relative to one unit of CO2. For example, the table below shows some gases and their GWP-
Greenhouse Gas Carbon dioxide (CO2) Methane (CH4) Nitrous oxide (N2O) Sulphur Hexafluoride (SF6) Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs)
When calculating carbon emissions, these other gases need to be included in the calculations and related to an equivalent CO2, hence the e after CO2e.
ORGANIZATIONAL FOOTPRINTS
Organizational carbon footprints are done in three distinct steps: 1. Define the boundaries (what you want to assess) 2. Collect the data 3. Calculate emissions and convert GHGs to CO2e The GHG Protocol divides the types of emission sources into three scopes. Scope 1 sources are direct emissions from the facility, such as: Emergency generators, Gas boilers etc. Scope 2 is the electricity purchased for the facility. Both Scope 1 and Scope 2 must be included in the calculations per the GHG Protocol. Scope 3 covers the indirect emissions from the operations such as: employees commuting to/from work. Scope 3 emissions are optional and are not required to be reported per the GHG Protocol.
PRODUCT FOOTPRINTS
Product assessments - 7 steps: 1. Analyze the materials and supply chain processes. 2. Build a supply chain map for the product 3. Define the assessment boundaries. The manufacturer has two choices4. Cradle to Gate. 5. Cradle to Grave. 6. Collect data (same as procedures used in case of organization footprints). 7. Calculate emissions using appropriate factors
Page 16
A cap-and-trade system constrains the aggregate emissions of regulated sources by creating a limited number of tradable emission allowances, which emission sources must secure and surrender in number equal to their emissions. The mechanism is based on the theoretical architecture developed around Coase theorem, along with the works of other economists namely Crocker, Dales, and Montgomery. The mechanism was first launched as a part of the US Acid Rain Interesting Fact: Program. Currently for greenhouse gases the largest of such markets is the European Union Emission Trading Scheme. The latest annual report from the Under this mechanism a central authority (usually a governmental World Bank on the global carbon body) sets a limit or cap on the amount of a pollutant that can be market showed that in 2009 it grew emitted. The limit or cap is allocated or sold to firms in the form of to $144 billion, up 6% from 2008 emissions permits which represent the right to emit or discharge a despite enduring its most specific volume of the specified pollutant. Firms are required to hold a 4 number of permits (or credits) equivalent to their emissions. The total challenging year to date. number of permits cannot exceed the cap, limiting total emissions to that level. Firms that need to increase their emission permits must buy permits from those who require fewer permits. The transfer of permits is referred to as a trade. In effect, the buyer is paying a charge for polluting, while the seller is being rewarded for having reduced emissions. Thus, in theory, those who can reduce emissions most cheaply will do so, achieving the pollution reduction at the lowest cost to society. Although the attributes of this mechanism in theoretical grounds proves to be a very sound solution, there are several criticisms about regarding its practice in realty. Annie Leonard provided a critical view on carbon emissions trading in her 2009 documentary The Story of Cap and Trade. This documentary emphasized three factors: 1. Unjust financial advantages to major polluters resulting from free permits, 2. An ineffectiveness of the system caused by cheating in connection with carbon offsets and 3. A distraction from the search for other solutions.
Calculating Your Carbon Footprint-3rd Vermont GREENING UP YOUR BOTTOM LINE Conference pdf http://www.carbonfootprint.com/calculator.aspx
Page 17
GREENWASHING
Greenwashing is a false advertisement technique used to convince consumers that products and services are environmentally safe and sound, when really they are not. In November of 2007, the Seven Sins of Greenwashing report was published. The reaction was vocal, global and long-lasting. The report exposed a nerve with consumers wanting to do the right thing but who were increasingly suspicious of misleading claims. Since the first study, consumers, journalists, marketers, policymakers and activists have used the Seven Sins of Greenwashing as a tool for analyzing and understanding environmental claims.
Judson Jaffe, Matthew Ranson and Robert N. Stavins (2009). "Linking Tradable Permit Systems: A Key Element of Emerging International Climate Policy Architecture". Ecology Law Quarterly 36 (789). World Bank's report on State and Trends of the Carbon Market(2010)
Page 18
HIDDEN TRADE-OFF:
unreasonably narrow set of attributes without attention to other important environmental issues. Paper, for example, is not necessarily environmentally-preferable just because it comes from a sustainablyharvested forest. Other important environmental issues in the paper-making process, including energy, greenhouse gas emissions, and water and air pollution, may be equally or more significant.
2. SIN
OF
NO PROOF:
accessible supporting information or by a reliable third-party certification. Common examples are facial or toilet tissue products that claim various percentages of post-consumer recycled content without providing any evidence.
3. SIN OF VAGUENESS: committed by every claim that is so poorly defined or broad that its real meaning
is likely to be misunderstood by the consumer. All-natural is an example. Arsenic, uranium, mercury, and formaldehyde are all naturally occurring, and poisonous. All natural isnt necessarily green.
4. SIN
unimportant or unhelpful for consumers seeking environmentally preferable products. CFC-free is a common example, since it is a frequent claim despite the fact that CFCs are banned by law.
5. SIN OF LESSER OF TWO EVILS: committed by claims that may be true within the product category,
but that risk distracting the consumer from the greater environmental impacts of the category as a whole. Organic cigarettes are an example of this category, as are fuel-efficient sport-utility vehicles.
6. SIN OF FIBBING: the least frequent Sin, is committed by making environmental claims that are simply
false. The most common examples were products falsely claiming to be Energy Star certified or registered.
7. THE SIN
OF
product that, through either words or images, gives the impression of third-party endorsement where no such endorsement actually exists; fake labels, in other words.
Page 19
principles are not new, the system conditions they form (see Table) are a breakthrough in making complex scientic principles understandable and dening the minimum conditions necessary for a sustainable society. The TNS framework helps us envision sustainability from a systems perspective. The four system conditions The Natural Step (adapted from Robrt1999 and Robrt etal. 1996)
The system conditions are obviously a tall order and cannot be met easily in the current economic system. However, they are not meant to be used as prescriptive rules; rather, they are intended as a tool to help a company envision a future towards which to orient its investments. In this way they act as a compass, helping a company avoid decisions that will have negative environmental and business consequences. At the strategic planning level, the TNS framework claries what is required of business to move from its current resource intensive processes to processes that support a sustainable relationship with nature. Because ecological pressures will increasingly shape the future economy, companies that understand the sustainability challenge are more likely to thrive.
Page 20
1. The participants in the planning exercise learn and discuss The Natural Step framework and agree to use it as a shared mental model. 2. The participants analyze the companys current situation in light of the funnel and the four system conditions. The company examines its current operations, products and services to determine where it is most out of alignment with the principles of sustainability. For example, for system condition one it asks whether the company is dependent on materials from the Earths crust that accumulate in nature. If so, is the company willing and able to phase out its dependence on this type of activity? This is done for each of the four system conditions. 3. Next, the company envisions an ideal future in which it operates in accordance with the principles of sustainability. This includes imagining how the marketplace of the future will view its products and services and how its core competencies can best be positioned to service that market. This can be a tremendous source of creativity and innovation. 4. Finally, the company designs an action plan that will move it from its current reality to its long-term vision. It takes advantage of low-hanging fruit, making sure that each short-term action serves as a platform for longer-term goals that are in alignment with the system conditions. This is necessary to avoid dead ends, or solutions that work in the short term, but pose problems in the long term.
Greening your Business: A Guide to Getting Started, sponsored by the Royal Bank of Canada 9 steps to greening your business by Kevin Slovick, a simple guide to setting up a green business Sustainable Business Models: Time for Innovation By Diane Osgood, Ph.D., Vice President, CSR Strategy, BSR
Page 21
Page 22
For further reading on developing a sustainable business and examples, refer to Capitalism at Crossroads Stuart L. Hart
http://www.iisd.org/business/pdf/business_strategy.pdf
Page 23
1. Perform a stakeholder analysis A stakeholder analysis is required in order to identify all the parties that are directly or indirectly affected by the enterprises operations. It sets out the issues, concerns and information needs of the stakeholders with respect to the organizations sustainable development activities. 2. Set sustainable development policies and objectives The next objective is to articulate the basic values that the enterprise expects its employees to follow with respect to sustainable development, and to set targets for operating performance. 3. Design and execute an implementation plan It is important to draw up a plan for the management system changes that are needed in order to achieve sustainable development objectives. 5. Develop a supportive corporate culture In order to ensure that the organization and its people give their backing to the sustainable development policies, an appropriate corporate culture is essential. 6. Develop measures and standards of performance The implementation of sustainable development objectives, and the preparation of meaningful reports on performance, require appropriate means of measuring performance.
Page 24
7. Prepare reports The next step in the process is to develop meaningful reports for internal management and stakeholders, outlining the enterprises sustainable development objectives and comparing performance against them. 8. Enhance internal monitoring processes On an ongoing basis it will be important to develop mechanisms to help directors and senior managers ensure that the sustainable development policies are being implemented.
http://www.nikebiz.com/crreport/content/strategy/2-1-4-a-new-model-and-shift-tosustainable-business-and-innovation.php?cat=cr-strategy
Page 25
regulation is generally weaker than it is in developed countries. Thus, it is widely thought that there is greater potential for developing countries to reduce their emissions than developed countries. The greenhouse gas benefits of each CDM project will be measured according to internationally agreed methods and will be quantified in standard units, to be known as 'Certified Emission Reductions' (CERs). These are expressed in tons of CO2emission avoided. When the Kyoto Protocol becomes fully operational, it is anticipated that these 'carbon credits' will be bought and sold in a new environmental market; they are already becoming a commodity. CDM projects need to seek approval by the CDM Executive Board. A number of rules and conditions will apply, some to all project types and others specifically to afforestation and reforestation projects. While several of the detailed procedures to be applied to CDM forestry projects are still to be agreed, the overall framework is already established for approving projects and accounting for the carbon credits generated: Only areas that were not forest on 31st December 1989 are likely to meet the CDM definitions of afforestation or reforestation. Afforestation is the direct human-induced conversion of land that has not been forested for a period of at least 50 years to forested land through planting, seeding and/or the human-induced promotion of natural seed sources. Reforestation is the direct human-induced conversion of non-forested land to forested land through planting, seeding or human-induced promotion of natural seed sources, on land that was forested but that has been converted to non-forested land. For the first commitment period (2008-2012), reforestation activities will be limited to reforestation occurring on those lands that did not contain forest on 31 December 1989. Projects must result in real, measurable and long-term emission reductions, as certified by a third party agency ('operational entities' in the language of the convention). The carbon stocks generated by the project need to be secure over the long term (a point referred to as 'permanence'), and any future emissions that might arise from these stocks need to be accounted for. Emission reductions or sequestration must be additional to any that would occur without the project. They must result in a net storage of carbon and therefore a net removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. This is called 'additionality' and is assessed by comparing the carbon stocks and flows of the project activities with those that would have occurred without the project (its 'baseline'). For example, the project may be proposing to afforest farmland with native tree species, increasing its stocks of carbon. By comparing the carbon stored in the 'project' plantations (high carbon) with the carbon that would have been stored in the 'baseline' abandoned farmland (low carbon) it is possible to calculate the net carbon benefit. There are still a number of technical discussions regarding the interpretation of the 'additionality' requirement for specific contexts. Projects must be in line with sustainable development objectives, as defined by the government that is hosting them.
Page 26
Projects must contribute to biodiversity conservation and sustainable use of natural resources. Only projects starting from the year 2000 onwards will be eligible.
Two percent of the carbon credits awarded to a CDM project will be allocated to a fund to help cover the costs of adaptation in countries severely affected by climate change (the 'adaptation levy'). This adaptation fund may provide support for land use activities that are not presently eligible under the CDM, for example conservation of existing forest resources. Some of the proceeds from carbon credit sales from all CDM projects will be used to cover administrative expenses of the CDM (a proportion still to be decided). Projects need to select a crediting period for activities, either a maximum of seven years that can be renewed at most two times, or a maximum of ten years with no renewal option. The funding for CDM projects must not come from a diversion of official development assistance (ODA) funds. Each CDM project's management plan must address and account for potential leakage. Leakage is the unplanned, indirect emission of CO2, resulting from the project activities. For example, if the project involves the establishment of plantations on agricultural land, then leakage could occur if people who were farming on this land migrated to clear forest elsewhere.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_Development_Mechanism http://www.cdmcapacity.org/what_is_CDM/rules_conditions.html
Page 27
true except in cases where the allocation of emissions rights (i.e., the amount of emissions that each country is allowed to emit) in the ETS is particularly favorable to developing countries.
INTERNATIONAL LAWS
Pollution does not respect political boundaries, making international law an important aspect of environmental law. A plethora of legally binding international agreements now encompass a wide variety of issue-areas, from terrestrial, marine and atmospheric pollution through to wildlife and biodiversity protection. While the bodies that proposed, argued, agreed upon and ultimately adopted existing international agreements vary according to each agreement, certain conferences have been particularly important.
Page 28
ORGANIZING PRINCIPLES
International environmental law's development has included the statement and adoption of a number of important guiding principles. As with all international law, international environmental law implicates questions of sovereignty, comity and even perhaps the Golden Rule. Other guiding principles include the polluter pays principle, the precautionary principle, the principle of sustainable development, environmental procedural rights, common but differentiated responsibilities, intergenerational and intergenerational equity, the "common concern of humankind", and the common heritage.
INTERNATIONAL TREATIES A SHORT LIST OF INTERNATIONAL TREATIES PERTAINING TO THE ENVIRONMENT IS DESCRIBED BELOW :
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty: A proposed treaty to prohibit all testing of nuclear weapons in all environments: underground, underwater, in the atmosphere and in space. In 1999, the U.S. Senate refused to ratify the treaty. The Kyoto Protocol: An international agreement setting binding limits on emissions of greenhouse gases from industrialized countries. This agreement was adopted in Kyoto Japan in December 1997 and supplements the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change adopted in 1992. Montreal Protocol: International agreement signed by more than 150 countries to limit the production of substances harmful to the stratospheric ozone layer, such as CFCs. Non-Proliferation Treaty: A multilateral treaty signed in 1968 which aims to control the spread of nuclear weapons; extended indefinitely in May 1995. The treaty has been signed by over 175 nations. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: An international agreement for dealing with climate change, adopted at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (the "Earth Summit") in Rio in 1992. AKA Climate Change Convention; Climate Treaty.
COST SAVINGS
Cost incentives are perhaps the biggest catalyst behind the green agenda. As businesses across the globe have to deal with a turbulent economy and ever nearing carbon reduction directives, cost, as in much of the outsourcing community, is indeed king. Escalating energy prices are also fueling the green fire.
ENFORCEMENT
The growing legislation surrounding climate change and in turn carbon reduction will affect everybody, regardless of whether a company is a supplier or end user. The enforcement of carbon reduction directives will have a direct impact on the outsourcing market, ultimately determining just how important
Page 29
the green agenda is.. As time goes by the number of regulations wont reduce, organisations will only face more regulatory compliance. If voluntary targets are not met, then sanctions, penalties and enforcement will only get tougher.
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
Manufacturers and service providers are looking to the green agenda to give them the competitive advantage. Developing green initiatives and implementing the strategies, means that businesses can prove exactly how green they are. Organizations not taking the green agenda seriously will find themselves very quickly ignored at the procurement stage. Not having green credentials will mean not even considered for the business. Green Business Cases (Pioneers of the industry) Sony Electronics: Innovation in Design Toyota: The Future of Propulsion BASF: Beyond Eco-Efficiency Chevron: The Power of Human Energy Whirlpool Alcoa
Page 30
LIST OF SOURCES
Down to Business on Climate Change: An Overview of Corporate Strategies by Seth Dunn Climate Change Strategy: The Business Logic behind Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Reductions by Andrew J. Hoffman The Business of Climate Change Challenges and Opportunities by John Llewellyn http://www.globalissues.org/article/521/un-framework-convention-on-climate-change http://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/background/items/1349.php http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Framework_Convention_on_Climate_Change Externality vs Public Goods, Hanming Fang, Duke University. http://www.auburn.edu/~johnspm/gloss/externality Calculating Your Carbon Footprint-3rd Vermont GREENING UP YOUR BOTTOM LINE Conference pdf http://www.carbonfootprint.com/calculator.aspx Judson Jaffe, Matthew Ranson and Robert N. Stavins (2009). "Linking Tradable Permit Systems: A Key Element of Emerging International Climate Policy Architecture". Ecology Law Quarterly 36 (789). World Bank's report on State and Trends of the Carbon Market(2010) Hart, S. and Milstein, M. 2003. Creating sustainable value Academy of Management Executive; http://e4sw.org/papers/Hart_Milstein.pdf Greening your Business: A Guide to Getting Started, sponsored by the Royal Bank of Canada 9 steps to greening your business by Kevin Slovick, a simple guide to setting up a green business Sustainable Business Models: Time for Innovation By Diane Osgood, Ph.D., Vice President, CSR Strategy, BSR http://www.iisd.org/business/pdf/business_strategy.pdf http://www.nikebiz.com/crreport/content/strategy/2-1-4-a-new-model-and-shift-tosustainable-business-and-innovation.php?cat=cr-strategy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_Development_Mechanism http://www.cdmcapacity.org/what_is_CDM/rules_conditions.html Design for Environment - A Guide to Sustainable Product Development (E-book) http://www.business.gov/manage/green-business/case-studies/
Page 31