Professional Documents
Culture Documents
School of Physics & Electronic Engineering, Taizhou University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China (zhoumx940@126.com)
2)
3)
Electrical Engineering Department, Zhejiang College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
(luoyx@zjwchc.com)
4)
School of Computer Science & software, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou Zhejiang, China (wwl@zjut.edu.cn)
AbstractThe paper develops research of feasibility and validity of Culture AlgorithmCA in unit commitment optimization. The
mathematic model of the optimization problem is established. Realization method of CA is presented, including design of population
space and culture space, design of acceptance function and influence function, and design of evolution strategies for two spaces. Solving
steps of CA is realized, and Optimization calculation program based on MATLAB language is compiled. The results of example shows
that CAs perfect advantage is faster speed and better convergence performance, which is viable and efficient for unit commitment
optimization.
KeywordsCultural Algorithm, Unit Commitment Optimization, Population Space, Culture Space, Acceptance Function, Influence
Function
1 2 3 4
1)
3)
4)
MATLAB
1.
60374056
Y505360
[1- 3]
3320
[4-5]
Genetic AlgorithmGA
[6]
3.1
[7-8]Culture AlgorithmCA
GA
2.
[9]
min Q = min q j u j
Belief Space
j =1
1 K
P = p ju j
(Update)
j =1
u j p min
p j u j p j min
j
u j p j max p j u j p
max
j
Population Space
1 NUM
(Generate)
14 Q m 3 / s
M
j = 1,2," , M p j j
1 CA
kW
q j j m 3 / s
u j
j u j = 1
u j = 0 P
p min
p max
j
j
j
p j min p j max j
3.2
3.2.1
14
p min
P M
2 M
u p
i i = (u i1 , u i 2 ," , u iN , pi1 , pi 2 ," , piN )
3321
P 5
i = (1,0,1,1,0; p1 ,0, p 2 , p3 ,0) 25
( 0 < < 1 )
0134
ait > s it
p a s it
i =1
p a
pi = P
popu NUM
0.6-1, p a 0-0.5
t
i
num t i popu
s it
t 0 =300
t
i
t =10 =0.98-1.0
t
i
K S ,
3.2.3
A
S s it t i
Generate
t t
t < t 1 t > t 1
a it t
a it =
t
si
t
s min
t
s min
F F
t
s max
finess = K Q k1 p1 k 2 p 2
Fstmax F
= F
t
+ (1 ) F
t
savg
i =1
a it t i
i =1
Fsit t i Fstmin
K f k 1k 2
t Fstmax t
34
t
t
Fsavg
[0,1]
K
NUM K K
K L < K < K U
3.2.2
Update
a1 a 2
i popu it fit it t 1
1
Fstmin
1
1, fit it > Fstmin
Accept ( ) =
0, otherwise
K
s kt +1 = a1 * s it + a 2 * s tj
0
t
si ai
3322
s kt +1 = 0.6 * sit
K
sit +1 = sit
K sit =
3.3
2
q/m3.s-1
p/mW
1#
2#
3#
10
16.0
13.0
10.7
20
25.3
23.4
22.3
30
34.7
33.3
34.1
40
44.1
44.7
46.5
50
54.2
56.6
60.7
2
50mW
1# 54.2m3/s
1#
3# 54.12m3/s
0.08m3/s 50mW
7000m3 4m3/kW.h
1750
1
CA
CA GA
GA
CA
80mW
3 4
3 4 CA
GA GA
20 CA CA
GA
2 CA
CA 30
CA
[9]
3 50mW
1
100m 0-150mW
MATLAB
100 7
20 620
0.8 0.02 20
3 CA
3323
pj/mW
P/mW
1#
2#
3#
1#
2#
3#
m3.s-1
30
28.99
1.01
33.28
50
47.65
2.35
54.12
70
50.00
20.00
76.50
80
47.57
29.96
2.47
87.41
90
49.97
31.50
8.53
98.16
100
50.00
36.26
13.74
109.50
115
50.00
40.00
25.00
127.05
130
49.97
49.40
30.63
144.91
145
50.00
49.90
45.10
164.12
[2]
[3]
[4]
4 GA
[5]
[6]
[7]
CA
MATLAB
CA
GA
Systems ,vol.2,no.2,pp.339-350,1987.
Tong S K, Shahidepour S M, Ouyang Z, A Heuristic
Short-Term Unit Commitment, Transactions on Power
System, vol.6, no.3, pp.1210-1216, 1991.
Wang S J, Shahidehpour S M, Kirschen D S.
Short-Term Generation Scheduling with Transmission
and Environmental Constraint s Using an Augmented
Lagrangian Relaxation, IEEE Trans on Power Systems ,
vol.10,no.3,pp.1294-301,1995.
,. .
,vol.22, no.1, pp. 27-29, 2006.
,.
.,vol.27, no.5, pp.5-9, 2008.
,.
.,vol.33, no.5, pp.47-50, 2007.
.(Memetic Algorithm) .
,vol.26, no.11, pp.1-5, 2007.
[1]
Q/
3324