.

12, 2010

614.8
.., . . , , ,
.., - . , ., ,
.., . .-. , .,




( )
.
, . ,
,
.
: , , ,

. ( 70 [1])
.
, , , .

, .
.
.
[2-3] , , : ; ;
; .. [4]
,
86

.., .., ..

.
[5],
, ,

r = ( pg ,V , , ) ,

(1)

T pg ; 2 ; V ; Tpg (max) .
.

,
.
. 1 [4].
0,75 /(),
0,45 /().
1

T pg (max)

T pg ,

x1

xi = 0

1023
250

xi = 1

xi = 1

1273

773

x2

3,5

2,5

x3

40

10

50

30

x4

0,1

0,05

0,15

0,05

,
/3
V ,
3

87

 . 12, 2010

. 2
, .
. 1
, ,
(. 1).
2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

x1
-1
1
-1
1
-1
1
-1
1
-1
1
-1
1
-1
1
-1
1

x2
-1
-1
1
1
-1
-1
1
1
-1
-1
1
1
-1
-1
1
1

x3
-1
-1
-1
-1
1
1
1
1
-1
-1
-1
-1
1
1
1
1

x4
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

, .

[5]

23
4,2
1,09
4,08
0,87
0,64
25,5
7,18
5,32
6,6
3,84
2,73
5,28
1,92
0,8
2,68
0,7
0,5
7,94
4,84
3,4
5,1
2,92
1,9
30,1
5,3
1,6
4,86
0,92
0,95
32,8
8,04
5,75
7,36
4,02
3,15
6,68
2,24
1,21
3,1
0,72
0,8
9,3
5,24
3,95
5,58
3,08
2,2

, . 25 27 .

:
88

.., .., ..

t sw = 3, 48 1,35 x1 + 1,37 x2 0,77 x3 + 0,174 x4 +
+0, 496 x1 x3 0,123 x1 x4 0,124 x1 x2 x3

(2)

tbw = 11, 24 6,32 x1 + 1, 27 x2 5,54 x3 + 1, 22 x4 +
4,73 x1 x3 0,92 x1 x4 0,77 x3 x4 + 0,68 x1 x2 x3

(3)

. 1
( . 2)

. 2 , : 1 ; 2 [5];
3

89

 . 12, 2010

.
(2)-(3) [6-7].
. 2 , .
, , , ( ), ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
, . , .
.

.
, . , , ,

, ..
, .

1.
2.
3.
4.

90

.. / .. , .. // . 2009. 26. . 4961.

__ [ ] //
: http://www.jcwiki.ru/ _-_
.
.. - / . , 1985. 311 .
..
, .., .., ..

5.

6.
7.

/ .. , .. ,
.. // . 2010.
27. . 8396.
.. / .. ,
.. , .. // . 2010. 28. . 8392.
.. / .. , .. .: , 1975, 168 .
.. / .. , .. , ..
.: , 1976, 254 .

.., .., ..


(
) . ,
. ,

, - .
: , , ,
Kluchka Yu.P., Krivtsova V.I., Borisenko W.G.
Determination of time of heating cylinders with hydrogen from
composite until their destruction
Obtained regression models, the duration of the heating cylinder with hydrogen (made of fiberglass and basalt fiber) until its destruction. The boundaries
of the areas for the three types of cylinders, causing the possible collapse of the
container. It is established that a container made of basalt fiber is the best choice
in terms of potential damage in case of exposure to elevated temperatures, and
fiberglass - the worst.
Key words: compressed hydrogen gas cylinder, numerical experiment,
factors

91