r:

WILLIAMS CUKER BEREZOFSKY

Woodland Falls Corporate Park
210 Lake Drive East, Suite 101
Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002 FILED
(856) 667-0500
DEC 1 4 2007
Attorneys for PlaintifJ(s) JUdge Jamie D. Happas

TERRI REX and CHARLES REX, w/h, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
LAW DIVISION
Plaintiffs, MIDDLESEX COUNTY
v.
DOCKET NO. MID-L-7IIO-07-MT
ORTHO-McNEIL
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON CIVIL ACTION
& JOHNSON; JOHNSON & JOHNSON IN RE: ORTHO EVRA BIRTH CONTROL
PHARMACEUTICALS RESEARCH and PATCH LITIGATION
DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. f/k/a R.W.
JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL CASE NO. 275
RESEARCH INSTITUTE; JANE DOE
DISTRIBUTORS (1-50); JILL DOE NOTICE OF MOTION AND ORDER
MANUFACTURERS (1-50); JACK DOE FOR ADMISSION TO PRACTICE
WHOLESALERS (1-50); JAKE DOE PRO HAC VICE
SELLERS (1-50); JOHN DOE
MARKETERS (1-50); JOAN DOE
FORMULATORS (1-50); JIM DOE
HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS (1-50); and
JEAN DOE (1-50),

Defendants.

Plaintiffs, Terri Rex and Charles Rex, request entry of an Order for the admission of

counsel pro hac vice. By their signatures below counsel warrant for purposes of this motion that

the representations set forth in Case Management Order # I, are true and applicable herein and

agree as a condition to the entry of an order granting this motion to comply with the terms and

conditions for admission pro hac vice set forth in Case Management Order # 1.

@"..)~ 1."1"
v '" , !
• . . • 1_"'),_
 Attorney Seeking Admission: Robert 1. Patterson, Esquire
Bar member, State of: State Bar of Texas, Bar No. 15604500
Motion Return Date: Friday, , 2007
Yes No

Motion Fee Paid: o

Consent of Adversary: o
Service Upon Counsel of Record: o
Address of Counsel to be Admitted:

Phone Number:

E-Mail:

G4---­
Robert 1. Patterson, Esquire
(Signature of Pro Hac Vice Attorney)

Dated: October 31, 2007 Dated:~ 1-- t), 0 1-­

ORDERED, that Robert J. Patterson, ESQ. is admitted pro hac vice in these matters

subject to the conditions set forth in Case Management Order #1.

Date: ----f-~---'-----+-----

~:v' E'''<9,~.OC
AS, J.S.C.

Having reviewed the above motion, I find it

to be meritorious on its face and is
unonoosed. Pursuant to BJ:6-2, it
tlerefore will be granted essentially for the
reasons setforth in the moving papers.