r

COST COMPARISON STUDY FOR

WELL WATER VERSES JORDAN VALLEY WATER

CONSERVANCY DISTRICT WATER

1 NOVEMBER 200

PREPARED BY

EPIC ENGINEERING C
P

3341 SOUTH 40gQ WEST

WEST VALLEY CITY UTAH 8412a

t
 I

ACKNUW LEDGMENTS

Successful completion of this study was made possible by the cooperation and assistance
of the RivertonStaff as shown below We sincerely appreciate the coaperation and assistance
provided by these individuals

Riverton City

Mayor
Bill Applegarth

City Council
Brad Markus

Randy Brinkerhoff
Alan Leavitt
Karma Bentson

Roy Tingey

City Staff
Lance Blackwood City Administrator

Scott Hill City Water Director

r
 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The City of Riverton City requested acomparison study be conducted to evaluate the cost of changing
the primary source of culinary water for the City This study was limited to the comparison of two
alternatives Alternative 1 continue pumping water from wells owned by the City far its primary source
and purchasing water from Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District JVWCD as a back up and
secondary culinary water source Alternative 2 convert the water purchased from JVWCD as the primary
source and use well water from up culinary water source This study includes
City owned wells as a back
a
qualitative comparison of the two alternatives and a
quantitative analysis to compare the total cost of
two alternatives The total cost for each alternative
operating the culinary water system under each ofthe
is then converted to rates to evaluate the feasibility of the second alternative
anticipated user

This conducted in effort to explore the s options

Clty to increase water quality The
study is being an

total dissolved solids content in water is associated with water hardness and may affect taste The
TDS
TDS in the water obtained from the City wells is greater than that obtained from JVWCD As a result
s
the City may choose to pursue Alternative 2 of JVWCD water as a primary water source if the cost
using
increase is not significant and no other serious consequences result due to making the change

The benefits that Riverton City would see resulting from the added use of JVWCD water include

Reduction in TDS and thus a perceived increase in water quality

Reduction in power and maintenance costs associated with operating the culinary wells

The disadvantages of converting to NWCD as a single source would include

Increased water purchase rates from JVWCD thus higher monthly costs
System upgrade costs to make the system switch possible
Pump stations wells and reservoirs will still need to be maintained to remain operational
Steeper water rate increases

Potential loss of some City owned culinary water rights

Potential loss of water rights on the effluent from a proposed waste use project
water re

It would take Jordan Valley one upgrade their system making this system switch possible
to two years to

Improvements over and above those identified in this study would be required to achieve adequate system
of the culinary water system for the 10
pressures and fire flows throughout the City The operating costs
year study period 2018
2009 were estimated for each ofthe two alternatives These costs included direct

expenses depreciation professional expenses and operating expenses Alternative 2 also included the

cost for system upgrades that are known to be necessary for the system switch to happen These costs

were estimated based on historical cost data and cost increase ratesprojected growth rates and rate data
and projections provided by JVWCD The total cost for the study period along with a rate summary for
each alternative is shown in the table below

1
Page
 ALTERNATIVE 1 2 COMPARISON
2009 2018 SUMMARY

2009 2018

Base rate Tier 1 rate Base rate Tier 1 rate Average Total Cost to City
Average
per month 1000 gal monthly bill per month 1000 gal monthly bill Study Period
14
19 25
1 99
22 74
21 42
1 11
26 550
347
31
Alternative 1
Alternative 10
25 14
2 69
31 39
36 10
3 95
45 276
142
49
2

Constructing a Membrane Water Treatment Plant

Cost Comparison vs

Another possible alternative quality concerns ofRiverton

to address the water swells would be to

3 This alternative was beyond the scope of this

construct a membrane treatment plant Alternative
study was conducted for this update made in May of2007 The
study However a option with a cost

It is estimated that this

cost per acre
foot of water treated was estimated to be 232 at that tithe figure
sdollars This
foot in today
would be 250 per acre cast could be added to the cost of Alternative 1 to

Alternative 2 The cost per acre

foot for culinary water
compare the membrane treatment alternative to
under Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 are listed for each year of the study period in Table 6 and Table 10

respectively The 2007 cast of the treatment plant study is available in Appendix D Th
update e
follows
comparison ofthese alternatives as

Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3

VWCD Purchased Water AF 620 4592 620

Purchase Cost AF 40
392 37
382 40
392

Total Purchase Cost 2009 00

288
243 755
1
04
843 00
288
243

total O M Cost 20D9 321

2
93
091 040
2
84
878 321
2
93
091

Total
Sub 564
2
93
379 796
3
88
721 564
2
93
379

reated Water 2009 AF 0 0 3972

reatment Cost AF 00
250

otal Treatment Cost 2009 00

OD0
993

Total 564
2
93
379 796
3
88
721 557
3
93
379

Actual Culinary Water Consumed By Residences

Readers evaluating the alternatives need to

recognize the decision of implementing either Alternative 2 or
3 would be made to address a small fraction ofthe total
culinary water that is consumed The average
person only consumes
drinks about a half gallon 64 oz of water each day This would result in less
than four gallons a day per connection on average This amount of water consumed is less than 1 of
the average culinary water usage in Riverton of430 gallons per connection per day

Page 2
 COST COMPAIRISON STUDY FOR
WELL WATER VERSES

JORDAN VALLEY WATER CONSTERVANCY DiSTR

CT WATER

PURPOSE FOR STUDY

This study has been conducted at the request ofRiverton City to determine the cost feasibility of
modifying the City
sprimary source for culinary water Currently the majority of the culinary water is

pumped from City owned deep production wells and the remainder is purchased under a take or pay
contract from Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District JVWCD

The reason for this study is Co explore the s options

City to increase water quality The total dissolved
solids TDS content in water is associated with water hardness and may affect taste The TDS in the
water obtained from the City wells is greater than that obtained from JVWCD The National
s Secondary
Drinking Water Regulations recommend maximum concentration
a for TDS in drinking water of 500 ppm

parts per million These regulations are only secondary standards that are in place for cosmetic or

aesthetic purposes and are not enforceable unless the State adopts them as standards Riverton City
s
current water quality report shows a range from 852 to 1010 ppm of TDS Jordan scurrent report
Valley
shows a range from 117 to 512 ppm ofTDS

In this study the cost of pumping fromproduction wells was compared to the cost of purchasing JVWCD
water for the majority ofthe
s culinary water supply Alternatives 1 and 2 require a second source
City
used as a back up or secondary source Currently water rates for the parts ofthe City served primarily by
production wells are lower than the rates served entirely by JVWCD water This is the result of the

productions well water costing the City less to provide to the public than the JVWCD water

METHOD OF STUDY

The approach taken in this study was to

project the total cost of operating the
culinary water system under
both alternatives over the next 10 years and then estimate user rates that would be
required to meet
projected costs Alternative 1 is to continue pumping water from wells owned by the City for its primary
source and
purchasing water from Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District JVWCD as a back up and
secondary source Alternative 2 is to convert to water purchased from JVWCD as the primary source anal
use well water from City owned wells as a
secondary source

The costs associated with Alternative 1 were estimated based on historical budget data and projections
made in the Riverton Water
System Master Plan Update 2008 The costs associated with
City Culinary
Alternative 2 were estimated based on the same planning projections and by reducing the projected costs

associated with well operations and increasing the projected costs associated with purchasing water from
7VWCD Costs for the JVWCD water will be estimated based on data provided by JVWCD The costs
associated with both alternatives were broken down by the differences in each plan and all assumptions
and limitations of tl
e study were included

t
Page 3
HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED CULINARY WATER USAGE

Culinary water usage has declined in Riverton City since the year 2000 due to the installation of a

secondary water system Prior to the installation of the secondary water system Riverton City had an
average usage rate greater than the Utah State average of approximately 750 gallons per day gpd per
connection The City is now well below the state average at 430 gpd per connection Current projections
estimate that the water usage per connection will remain constant into the future now that the
culinary
secondary water system has reached build out Table 1 contains the historical and projected culinary
water usage per connection for Riverton City from 2000 to 201
8

I
TABLE 1
Riverton City Historical and Projected Culinary Water Usage

Total
Usage Total
Unit 000
1 Usage
Usage
Year Connections connlda
al alions AF

2000 146
6 999 241
2
047 87
6

2001 361
6 705 636
1
844 024
5
2002 680
6 553 348
1
325 138
4

2003 090
7 499 291
1
337 963
3

2004 315
7 480 281
1
588 933
3

2005 505
7 454 243
1
654 817
3
2006 683
8 42 356
1
458 163
4

2007 288
9 430 457
1
081 472
4

2008 392
9 430 473
1
396 522
4

2009 533
9 430 495
1
497 590
4
2010 700
9 430 521
1
668 670
4

2011 430 559

1
710 787
4
942
9
2012 191
10 430 598
1
703 907
4
2013 446
10 430 63
1
670 029
5
2014 707
10 430 679
1
637 155
5

2015 974
10 430 721
1
628 284
5

2016 194
11 430 756
1
061 390
5

2017 418
11 430 791
1
182 497
5

2018 646
11 430 827
1
006 607
5

The 10 Y ear p eriod used for this stud Y was from 2009 to 2018 using the P rojected data from Table 1
Actual usage will vary from the projected data but the relative cost difference between the two
alternatives is valid for the purpose of this study

Page 4
PEAK DEMANDS

During the summer months a higher demand for culinary water still exists even with the installation of

the secondary water system This is partially due to some users including a golf course and several
schools using culinary water for irrigation It has been determined that a peaking factor of 1
76 should be

used to estimate the volume of culinary water used in July compared to the average monthly use
JVWCD uses thepeak usage of its customers during the summer to evaluate what rates to charge the
water year Riverton has been able to keep their rates lower than many by utilizing the
following
production wells during the hottest part of the year Jordan Valley has higher water purchase rates from
May through October so projections for water use by month were made to help estimate water
purchasing casts Roughly 69 of culinary water use ui Riverton is used during that time Table 2 below
provides a monthly breakdown ofthe anticipated culinary water usage for the study period

TABLE 2
Water for Riverton
Projected Monthly Culinary Usage City 1000 gal

Month n of Annual 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
peaking
Factor

Jan 528
63
0 962
78 34
80 35
82 412
84 52
86 68
88 902
90 720
92 57
94 51
96

Feb 51
4
54
0 44
67 62
68 34
70 10
72 90
73 75 64
77 19
79 78
80 43
82

Mar 12
5
n
61
0 569
76 90
77 85
79 85
81 90
83 99
85 14
88 910
89 70
91 58
93

Apr 56
5
n
67
0 150
83 60
84 72
86 88 11
91 38
93 72
95 637
97 59
99 62
101

May 61
9
n
15
1 717
143 232
146 88
149 fi35
153 47
157 41
1fi1 44
165 757
168 13
172 65
175

Jun 22
12
47
1 750
182 94
5
1 59
190 361
195 24
200 252
205 38
210 591
214 882
218 36
223

Jul fi4
14
76
1 941
218 772
222 342
228 050
234 901
239 89
245 04
252 087
257 22
262 59
267

Aug n
99
13
68
1 220
209 881
212 20
218 65
223 25
229 981
234 85
240 673
245 58
250 71
255

Sep n
52
10
26
1 326
157 08
160 082
164 18
168 38
172 69
176 11
181 73
184 432
188 28
192

dct 09
8
g7
O 986
120 10
123 181
126 33
129 56
132 88
135 28
139 06
142 90
144 87
147

Nov 32
5
64
0 560
79 95
80 97
82 051
85 17
87 35
89 591
91 422
93 291
95 241
97

Dec 15
5
62
0 018
77 3fi
78 32
80 333
2 39
84 501
86 66
88 43
90 24
92 13
94

Total 0
100
495 66
1
497 521
1 559
1
71 598 67
1
70 638
1 679 62
1
63 721
1 756
1
84
827
1821
791
0611

CULINARY WATER OPERATION COSTS

Riverton has been operating the culinary water system for its residences since it became
City in 1967 a

Expenses that the

City incurs to operate and maintain the
culinary system generally be divided
water can

into three categories 1 direct expenses 2 professional expenses and 3 operation and maintenance O

M expenses Direct expenses include administration office support wages insurance taxes training
benefits and other expenses Professional expenses include engineering services legal services and

independent auditing costs Operation and maintenance expenses include purchasing water treatment and

Page 5
 Another item that must be included in the is the depreciation ofthe
distribution costs operating costs
system infrastructure Depreciation covers the replacement of existing pipes reservoirs wells etc For
this study the cost for system upgrades was added to Alternative 2 to account for changes that would be

necessary to operate the entire system with only JVWCD water

Table 3 contains a breakdown ofthe operation costs from 2006 and 2007 The general categories as

described above have been divided into categories

sub spent on various operations
to show the amounts

that are of interest to this study Projections were made over the study period for these expenses for each
of the two water supply alternatives
culinary source

TABLE 3

Water Operation Costs

Culinary

2006 2007

Direct Expenses
Transmission Distribution Wages etc 421
0
092 1
672
488
Other 0
205
368 440
8
554
Total
Sub 297
9
7
0 01
227
929

Depreciation Professional Expenses

Depreciation 575
24
982 846
688
Professional Expenses 250
2
0 6
578
69
Total
Sub 2
232
578 758
21
425

Operating Expens
s
Well House Power 191
0
930 213
8
670
Fluoridation 0
947
14 2
690
14
Water Purchase JVWCD 0
829
227 0
804
221
Water Sampling 0
86
13 62
871
20
Well House Security 0
4968
Consumer Confidence Report 0
11 115
1
0
Other 182
0
684 2
198
200
Total
Sub 0
255
836 0
350
672

Total Expenses 003 784

2 2 002
3
2 60
of Connections 682
8 288
9
Cost per Connection 80
230 09
254

rates For water from

As described earlier the purchase Jordan Valley varies depending on the time of year
it is used as well as where it is used Riverton City currently has two pressure zones that are serviced by

NWCD sources NWCD can supply s water into the

City current low zone Water can be supplied into

the s other pressure

City through existing pressure reducing stations Water supplied to the City
zones s
lows zone is delivered at a lower cost due to Jordan Valley not requiring an additional booster pump to
service the zone Table 4 provides a summary of the usage of Jordan Valley water by season and pressure

zone far the City in recent years as well as the rates and total costs for this water The winter rates in
Table 4 are separated because NWCD updates the water rates at the beginning ofNovember

Page 6
 I

TABLE 4

NWCD Water Purchase Costs

2006 2007 2008

Rate Rate Usage Rate Usage

Usage
Cost AF Cost
AF AF Cost AF AF AF
West
one A East of 3200
29
1 02
345 50
266 39
52 92
961
13 19
5
2 21
9 627
2
40
Winter Apr
Jan 50
266

Winter 00
0 19
285 38
104 56
767
29 02
278 40
28 895
7
56
Dec
Nov 50
266
95
22 644
7
55 48
356 77
134 29
043
48 53
347 27
291 90
225
101
Summer Oct
May 13
333

one C West of 3200 West

53
275
27 05
317 64
92 65
370
29 10
336 14
69 15
239
23
Winter Apr
Jan 05
317 03
86

Winter 05
317 33
133 13
271
42 10
336 89
34 84
727
11 12
339 86
32 45
143
11
Dec
Nov
OD
553
143 39
407 76
201 03
193
82 63
408 11
189 03
277
77
Summer May
Oct 68
383 15
374

Flat Rate 739

6
80 739
6
80 739
6
80
Charges
Total 03
829
227 09
804
221 28
148
230

Projected October through December

ALTERNATIVE 1 WELL WATER FOR PRIMARY SOURCE

Projections for the operation costs of Alternative 1 were made using the same
assumptions used in the
Water Master Plan Update for Riverton Financial records were updated to be current
2008 Culinary City
as possible but the rates used for theexpected increase in expenses will be the same Direct expenses are
projected to increase at a 0 each year Professional expenses and depreciation are projected at
rate of S

to increase 4
5each year
a3
0increase per year Operating expenses are projected

costs for water were made using the average usage from Table 4 and rates
The projected purchased
increasing at 5per year This rate increase was suggested by Jordan Valley staff For the projected
rates the winter rates were assumed to be constant far each calendar year Table S shows the projected
water purchase cast break down for 2009 2014 and 2018

TABLE 5

Alternative 1 JVWCD Water Purchase Costs

2009 2014 2018

620 620 620

Contract Amount acre
feet
Rate Rate Usage Rate Usage
Usage
AF AF Cost AF AF Cost AF AF Cost

one A East of 3200 West

Winter 45
299 65 22
464
19 18
382 65 82
841
24 54
464 65 39
195
30

Summer 91
364 150 98
735
54 72
465 15D 52
858
69 09
566 150 46
913
84

one C West of 3200 West

91
352 150 75
935
52 41
450 150 92
560
67 47
547 150 72
120
82
Winter
Summer 06
429 255 68
410
109 60
547 255 84
638
139 62
665 255 88
731
169

Flat Rate 739

6
80 739
6
80 739
6
8D
Charges
otal 43
286
243 90
639
308 25
701
373

to 2018 The total

Table 6 shows the projected culinary water operation costs for Alternative 1 from 2009
projected operation costs for Alternative 1 through the study period is 31
55
244
198

Page 7
 N J
CN 47 1 W O N R N O
n O V N 1
4j p j j ap7
1 Q
m N 7 NT 47 M m I 1 D
0 W CO C M c
v O N

4 4i ch Q
N N M N
M
f
e
44 67
d9 d9 43 V3 V3 d9 V3 V3 69 dE
q EA 69 49

1j3
0 1

try N 1
C N v M G
w V O M
Ste Q1
1 8 ti YO N CO N r
r
Q N
OD
1

47
fD

4
N N m O 7 N M 477
1 n u7 41 c7 M C

6A 1
6
V fH E9 69 6H 69 d3 6A 6A 6R fH f9 d4 V 6R

M al N
O O p pp ap c7 O O O M
O C M C D N O cD 1 M 4 4
as
O 41 ttV
c nom
D
F C7 7 C7 O pp Q M
fp C lmn F 4 ab C fp lC N rn M M D
r ir
m c rn
N rn7 M api o

N f
0 fr N S

6H 6H 6s
3 6g 6RT as ug w v yr da ua 6R tr Fr

cM7 4 7
r 7 rn
u i u
i ci o v rn
po O o o d i 4 CV L m ppi
C7 W N
Q
D7 DO O OO H D 1 O ti 7 N D

N
n
uQp
D W 04
p
1Q
Ql i c
N N y7p
Q N
M
O
47

69
M bA E9 EF 69 h V W 69 6A d1 t fR d4 d3 69

o
r rn m p chi i cMn i M
4 M m n rMi 4Qi
V O M
f
0471
C

G
r J
1 r N
J
C O1
OY O V 47 d Q
N
Q N T UJ

rI 1 u7 N a1 ad aD N N 47
N
f 01
Np QOM N p
G p c OMl N l
O N
7

69 69 69 64 6 VT
6R 64 u4 ER 69 fY 69 69 GF

Cho ti I M
6p9 Q N p
Co

7
C M

v
C ado
X077
1
u m rn
4O d

m N 1 a1 v co
p
C1 j p
y
M pp N 11 O 47 N N V N C W

p7 r

Ct0p 1 PJj 4i
N aMO m N N
N

4
CO
C1
47
R
N W G
CJ
69
e9 3
F 6R tg V3 6R 69 WY V3 V3 N3 d4 Eq Eq

N N
iy N C M rn ti D W fp 4 N Q1 N
C7 N nl 01 tp M V N
pMppp i
77i
4
1
N
p o al
opt Q1
N N V C cV
Np
u
N O N Q1

u41
W
ICI
N W W N
N N
N
VY VY
Vl Y3 bR 3 3 di Y
tl V3 G3 69 69 W3

1 Gi T 47 C 4 O D C 6ppR 44j
6 NC 4
Q C7 N ao v N h ao D a0 C7
W C aD N o
p W
r p Q cpo i ado
N N N 9 m m
T 7 Cl M D 1n n ao M 1 W Ql N 1 1

y O Qi 4l W 0
a O N
f M W 7
j u
p j r y7
W N
47 J ti aJ N N N W r

O Eq ER 69 V3 H3 e9 614 6R 69 E9 FH A 69 6R 69

V Y
O OO1
9
6
Vp N
M N

O
N Gl
N lV
W
O
fp
01 47 N N

01 h N M 4 1 4 O O tv N 1

C C p G1 A ti O 1 M1 OJ N V N 1 N C 47

r
N
4 4 ti N N N 1 ff
N

E9 VY VfV3 69 V3 69 6p 6R 69 6R
a b4 Eq 69 ER E14 Eq

1
4 C1 C
u7 aD rn N D M
r ti c o c a1 o v cn co v m rn b C7 V

00 N a m N
Cri
ny p CyOy C LV

cN N 47

Lf N 47 N N N 1
O
N
6R 6R 6M W W
fH 69 H 6q 69 6R 69 Vi 3 e9 3 T
6

U N

d
N

C
y d
d
rn n
x

c
W
y yy
a
m T
C O
v
N O d
d0 a

y
0
udy C N C W j N
W w O
pZS 6 d
N Cn d O C

U y
m p c W H o c v p a
w
K m M m c p a Vi i E Q
C
U
vale
w
0 2 m c
z
m c u o n
L j N C
7
N a
L
i y

c1 Q N

o F
p Q
o a
o
ii U S
in o o
U
ro
o
 ALTERNATIVE 2 JVWCD WATER FOR PRIMARY SOURCE

made in part by information

provided by
Projections for the operation costs of Alternative 2 were
or eliminating some of the
Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District and in part by reducing and
of well pumping operations
expenses that are a direct result

The Transmission anal Distribution item under direct expenses was 000 in 2008 before
reduced by 20

account for the wages that would no longer be paid to

being inflated for the first year of the study to
maintenance personnelfor pump station maintenance

This
Frofessional expenses far 2008 were reduced by 25 before being inflated for the 2009 projection
and fees that are associated with station
was done to account for the reduction in engineering legal pump
maintenance and new pump station design

related to
Certain items under the operating expenses were reduced significantly as they are directly
These items include well house power and fluoridation They
production well pump station operations
were estimated be 3 ofthe values under Alternative 1 for 2009 Water sampling responsibilities and
to
for these were not changed
the Consumer Confidence Report will still fall on the City and so the expenses
that was increased for Alternative 2 the water puxchase expense
for Alternative 2 The only expense was

the next section The inflation rates used to project

The projections for this expense are explained in same

costs for items in Alternative 1 were also used for Alternative 2 after the adjustments were made to the
2009 amount

also added to address the system needed for Alternative 2

An additional item was upgrade costs

ALTERNATIVE 2 WATER PURCHASE PROJECTIONS

The for the cost of purchased water from JVWCD required the most detail and special
projections
attention of all the operation costs for Alternative 2 There components for these
were two main

the rates that Jordan Valley would likely

projections that needed determination The first component was

charge in this scenario these rates would vary as described earlier depending on the time of year and
factor
location where the water is taken from in the Jordan Valley system and due to the assessed peaking
The second component was the amount of usage corresponding to each ofthose rates

Water Purchase Rates

Based on discussions with JVWCD it was decided that three pressure zones would be required to

effectively service the entire City with Jordan Valley water This is one more zone than the City currently
12 connection to the Jordan
takes directly from JVWCD This additional zone would require a new
Aqueduct and take one to two years to be placed online This time delay is due to an upgrade that
JVWCD is plaruiing and completion is projected one to two years out The three pressure zones and two
water In addition
seasons combine to make six different rates that the City can be charged for JVWCD

to these six rates there is also a limited quantity of water available in the highest pressure zone at a year

round rate

This year round rate is significantly less than summer rates in the high pressure zoue the 700 acre
feet

that is available from this source was assumed to be used before taking water at the other rates for this
those for
1 zone Projectedrates used For Alternative 2 are for the same pressure zones than
higher
9
Page
1
the following
Alternative l Thereasoning is the peak usage that would be used to calculate the rates for
As a means of comparison South Jordan City gets all of its culinary water
year would inevitably go up
the
from Jordan Valley It assumed that the Alternative 2 rates for Riverton City would be based
was
on

average of the current Riverton rates and the South Jordan rates Rates for the additional pressure zone

between the two existing pressure zones were assumed to be the average of the high and low zones
rates used
Table 7 contains the current rates for Riverton City and South Jordan City as well as the 2009
for Riverton under Alternative 2

TABLE 7
Increased Capacity Purchase Rates

Riverton current South Jordan Riverton New

Base Zane Winter 02

278 98
324 50
301

Summer 53
347 23
406 88
376

Zone B Winter 83
358 05
332

Summer 08
440 43
407

Zone C Winter 12
339 08
386 60
362

Summer 63
408 33
467 98
437

Zane C BCWTP Year round 06

34fi 06
34G 06
346
has no connections to zone B
Riverton City currently

rates shown in Table 7 were inflated 5 per year just as the Alternative 1 rates were
The 2009 projected
This inflation rate was also at the recommendation of7VWCD

Water Usage Distribution

The total usage for both alternatives was assumed to be the same The amount used during the summer
was assumed to be 69 of the total to match the monthly usage
statistics
season May throughOctober
shown in Table 2 Usage by pressure zone had to be estimated based on pressure zone size and density
s production wells also had to be accounted for It was
The portion ofwater still pumped from the City
on zone size and density 65 ofthe total usage would be used in the low base
determined based
7
6 would be used in the middle zone B pressure zone and 27
4 would be used in the
pressure zone
feet available from the Bingham Copperton Water
zone All of the 700 acre
high zone C pressure
Treatment Plant was utilized in each year ofthe study to minimize the projected costs Table 8 shows
The flat rate charges were increased by 360 par
ratesusage and total cast for select years in the study
of a 12 connection
month compared tq the flat rate charges in Alternative 1 to account far the addition
month and an upgrade of a 10 connection to an 18 connection from 95
140 month to 315 month
s Rules and Regulations fvr Wholesale
These are standard meter base charges found in Jordan Valley
Water Service which can be found in Appendix B

Page 10

1
 TABLE 8
Alternative 2 JVWCD Water Purchase Costs

2014 2018
2009
4600 5200 5600
Contract Amount AF
Rate Rate Usage
Rate Usage Usage
Cost AF AF Cost
AF AF Cost AF AF
Base zone East of 3200 West
80
384 1039 34
897
399 73
467 1130 56
706
528
Winter 50
301 925 05
974
278
2313 112
1
36
632 66
584 2516 471
1
59
017
Summer 88
376 2060 10
188
776 00
481

one 3 3200 to 3600 W it

108 14
832
35 79
423 121 84
363
51 12
515 132 43
908
67
Winter 05
332
43
407 94
848
97 00
520 270 26
262
140 06
632 293 54
441
185
Summer 240

one 4 West of 3600 West

173 69
845
62 78
462 221 83
453
102 51
562 2fi0 86
159
146
Winter 60
362
98
437 386 11
975
168 99
558 493 17
468
275 45
679 578 84
978
392
Summer

one 4 BCWTP West of 3600 West

Winter 217 02
095
75 67
441 217 39
842
95 86
536 217 02
497
116
06
346
06
346 98
146
167 67
441 483 61
326
213 85
536 483 83
299
259
Summer 483

80
059
11 80
059
11 80
059
11
Flat Rate Charges
Well Water Used 0 0 0
City
4592 5158 402
2
61
306 5610 179
3
46
069
Total 673
1
84
965

Under Alternative 2
System Upgrades Required

the existing
As described earlier it will be necessary to figure in additional cost to make upgrades to
order to make Alternative 2 functional Amore detailed analysis of the system would need to
system in
cost ofall could be estimated The items listed in Table 9
be made before the accurate required upgrades
known portion of these The 12 meter vault
were used in this as would be a
study they new
upgrades
and 10 waterline would allow service to the middle pressure zone while the upgraded meter vault
new

would allow for peak demands in the low pressure zone to be met The annuity of 81
33 was
888
calculated to pay for these improvements equally over the entire study period

TABLE 9

Required Upgrades

Quantitiy Unit Price Cost

Required Improvement
Construct new 12 meter vault 1 EA 000
200 EA 00
000
200

EA 000
200 EA 00
000
200
Upgrage existing 10 meter vault to 18 1

10 waterline 112 LF
2 1101 LF 00
320
232
Replace existing line with
Total 00
320
632

Annual payment @ 5 for 10 years 33

888
81

in the way water would be

There would likely be more pipes requiring upgrade due to the change
distributed in Alternative 2 The system is set up such that larger pipe is installed closer to the current

primary production wells with smaller and smaller pipe extending

sources to the outer parts of the
extent and exact locations
system Amore detailed study would need to be conducted to determine the
where these pipes would need to be replaced

11
Page
 There several pressure reducing valve
are PRV stations between the higher and lower pressure zones to

allow movement of water from the higher zone to the lower zone when needed Several PRV stations
to meet the The costs
would need to be removed or relocated and adjusted new system requirements
associated with these changes were not included in this study

Cost for Alternative 2

Operation Summary

costs of the
Water purchase and system upgrade costs are the two items that increased the operation
Alternative 2 because it
culinary water system under Alternative 2 The system upgrade item is unique to
includes upgrades necessary to alter the water system primary source from wells to purchased water
only
Several items associated with well operations were reduced The Transmission and Distribution item was
reduced 000 Professional expenses were
by 20 reduced by 25 Well house power and fluoridation
were reduced to 3of the values for Alternative 1 in 2009 Table 10 summarizes the projected operation
casts for Alternative 2 throughout the study period The total cost to operate the culinary water system
under Alternative 2 is 99
275
142
49

12
Page

I
 N ip 4 ONO N l
Q
Ny h
i 4
f W J
N N
O V
m N Q f
e 6 Oi a0 49

N cCp W p

N V tr i C OHO n p fpD N
C N
y
u ate ti 4
C pi f u a1 M M N
N 7
c a i W

V3 69 Vi tl i9 H VJ M 69 9 69 Mt f E T 69
M

Vpi r
aD
pp

ry7
01
N

O
n
f
aN
f0

m
N
r
w
N
t7
N
ui
pp
M
M
DO

pp

b
t
f
ti
u
a

T CV
M
W
N
ILi

4J
n
N
J
o

1
ti
O

T O
O
ti
f
N1
h
O
a1 pp
W

m
4J
Q

W
7
o
p

N
4

4
ti nN ego
r CVGh bR C 7 00

N r
r CV C h

w fR

O
tl 6H

Wjj
l tl

6p9
MQ

O
Vd H

9 6p9 eNp
6
Vf

O
M

O
V3
I
i
O M N
W
N O
p G

ODD
4p Yl M
O ONY M
W 0p OHO D
f N GI Ci
CJ D L N
V
C O
Oa I O W tr t7 C 7
p OD aD ao T CV C 1 M rn
OO C r

IN O ODD Op
69 n M
N t i
K
N
N J h

69 69 tlf 6R
bR V3 tlf f9 M V fH d9 V3 b4 69 tl

W f
D
6Q4
u O ti C J
u

Np
W ti W OO
ppO
tL
pp 17
C 4 47 1
O 4
1 N D 7
d V7
7 N
s

N N d N

OOPpp N
1
c
m
O f
up P 00pp
Cri
47 D 1
e CO R C 47 N N p
N r nl N Sri r

N A V VA d9 fA 69 b9 69 N d 69 E9
A d4

OM OO
69 ti M
My J M eN V
p
M
OpOpp
O

Np CMY
Q
T
C

fQp
m

V
Of

QI
pp
D
fNp
k7 p
f
t10 Q N O N 1 Q CJ 1
e Cl ti Q
vi i u
N of o
ao
oo N
N V N Cn
A N
Cd N N N V

64 69
ff f3 M 6R iR N 3 69
F FR 6R 4A R FR b7 M

C CO N
47 O C C7 KJ i 4 IA CO N O
N O C fD 1
1 M N 4 A Q 7
N
u N 00 C A ti p N O
prp
el CyV W

M N u S QO H C W V 1 tl T rp O
1
c Q d N N O Op L 1 ems
h
N N
O fN0 47 N ONO N CI
1 N 1 p

N N 7

yy
y 64 A
6 M 3 FR
b N M 69 bH T69 69 iR VY Vl H3 9
Q W
1
O T 7 cp
D N D
O Qrl
Ql
7 fp7pp yW W
p Tnp
C
1 T

M N u v o C
IUQ N

6
a0

OO
opi tl
1

ti N
M

7
K
N 1
4 N 9
6 CR Q p
N
b N N v
T

H
6R i9 tl 3 3 M b A HT d3 3 6R
F 69 VY tlT 69 d4

p pp
01

H W 7 N N W C V MO O L O C 7
4
1 d4 CV C7 OD Of Q p O O ti

00 N O 1
M Ol N D f7 OD N J W

O 00 V C1 N CD C11 n W i f 1 to a
N
M1 P

4 ti pp
4 I
N N m
47 u7 1 fA O Qi N

hl

W A MJ
bq b4 VY f9 M VJ V3 d9 d9 b4 e9 K

4 Q N OrO C7 1
0 M
O 7

1
M
p N

1
N

C
Cppp X77
P D M cO 00 N
N
r
O ti
7
u
m
C p
p 7 ems N f N F OO O p 7
N
D u a N m N G of
M1

rn
N N

M
cs v as bs f b
v3 ER M of w us 3 b9
F 6q 6g e3 e

O n ti N p M b C N C7 O N C W
V
D fN i NO
4 pp p T N O V
c pN N
N 1 N I c 6 p ri f N 4 N
ti CJ A a0

C u o N
IL pW
1A 00
r

C
N
W
N
T
N
N
r r r f

N R FR tli M Vb fR
6 49 tl V3 3
F b3 M HT 6F 6q

N
m

W O

p O
U
O
d
w c i a
m
d at5 a
y
y d
y c i c
u7
N
c
O
o
i
c o y
R
U H y
m o a c w N o E H y o a v w
d cn E
A c l a x m

w m
B 1Q
E t N ul n C

v r o m M n io w F U
O O d v ii r U D y
c
Q o V U
1

WATER RATE COMPARCSON

for both alternatives were estimated for the study period and are shown in Table 6 and
Operation costs
Table 10 fnr Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 respectively The total volume of culinary water projected
feet The average cost per acre
940 acre foot for the
to be used by Riverton City during this time was 50
45for Alternative 1 and 964 71 for Alternative 2 In order to
City to provide culinary water was 61 2
cast difference
establish the feasibility of accepting Alternative 2 it was necessary to look into what the
would be to the customers of the City
s culinary water system A simplified user rate analysis was
conducted for each of the alternatives to accomplish this

for west of4800

West who are served
The City currently has a different rate structure set up customers

These are in the highest pressure zone in the City and the City
entirely be Jordan Valley water customers

water from Jordan Valley to serve them If Alternative 2 were

pays the highest rates to purchase the

adopted a similar system would likely be set up to ensure that the cost to service higher pressure zones
would be passed on to the customers of that zone k or the purpose of this study all rates throughout the

City were assumed to be the sarne

The rate structure that the City uses has a base charge flat monthly rate for the first ten
thousand gallons

that a customer uses and then 4 tier rates per thousand gallons used The tier rotas increase with
additional usage to deter aver use Some customers may never use mare than ten thousand gallons in a
month while others may use enough Co put them over the 4 h tier every month To address the uncertainty
in use it was assumed that all connections would the average of430 gallons per day This is the
use

be collected for this study were

equivalent of 080 gallons
13 per month So the water rates assumed to
the base 000 gallons
charge 10 and 3
08 multiplied by 080 gallons Rates far the
the tier 1 rate 3
tiers did not need to be estimated as a result ofthis assumption
higher

The base tier 1 rate and a constant annual rate increase were estimated far each ofthe two
charge
cash Xow meet expenses the study
alternatives The rates were adjusted to ensure adequate to
throughout
there balance of zero between collected rates and operating expenses at the end
period ensuring that was a

of the study Table 11 shows the estimated rates in each year ofthe study for both alternatives

what the ofthe City currently pays and only

The rates under Alternative 1 for 2009 are majority are

42 per year The rates under Alternative 2 for 2009 are projected to increase
projected to increase at 1
at 4
21 per year The average customer bill with the usage 69 in 2009
described above would be 31

95 in 2018 under Alternative 2 This would be

and 45 an 70 in 2009 and 84
increase of 8 19 in 2018
from the average bill under Alternative 1

Page 14
 e o c o o rn o rn
ch
0
N
r N
7 L

N gi
c a rn a
a0 ch 9l I

N O
N O
c N N
d
C7 Pj P P

fA EA H9 N3 fR EA b9 1f Efl EA ER fA A M

C7 O N O C7 d N CO f0 N d 01 01
ct p W CO N O O p
aOp
N N
N
Q V

N QNi n W CJ
ui u
y D p u qq
p
N W
q N
M M P u

Hf H3 69 69 M H3 v3 64 Vi Vi v3 V3 Vi b9

M
ch u N T M 47 O C7 C7
N
N N
N M
N

Q
qpP
N O 4 M

C7 p p
C7 aN0 n O
N V r
cD CV1
ci cM 1
4

EA 64 EA 64 69 49 EA EH ER b9 to V3
ER 4d

M O N d W d7 O Q1
a0 C7 d N N O N M t cD f 1

r o O p O 7 N N p r
p
ry 7
L
N
Vim N
h

Ldp fCOp D

p fop
N
O
N N M N V

h 7

fry FA 69 E9 69 M to 64 b9 E9 M EA H3

ti cM0 N N
d N
O O N m
o o a co n i
ef
M
r

N
o
O 4 r

ti

m ri ui a

rra rrs e e u3 vi yg e yr va 6s v3 wi

4 N M p N CO O a 7
N
N
M
W
rn r aD M SO u N 7

N W N
N y N N N W M
N a0 V d0 7 T N
M
V

N O d O W r
O ni i
O

a a
Z 1 O fJ ti W n Ql Z N p 1

cMcp
N m O N 1 O Ql o0 O a0
M a
M N N W N N
N M Cp M
H V

O r wL
r
N 6 tltltl
Fw
N p a0

ti

N N tF tl
Q

M E9 69 VT 69 M f9 b9 ER E9 64 b4 M EA

l y P a0 C7 W p N 7 O Q1 D

9i N N
Owl p
N N N
r

N W fMri 7
C O N 7
C
N ti N

CV CV

ER 64 b9 64 aA f9 fl b9 fA 6g 64 64 fl A

N b CMO M M M N I
M O
N
p
M O N N N N O d
p O I M W N D
p0
N l
Q a O 4N7 N
n Ql M

V CV M

fA b9 64 69 eA u9 6g 69 H9 aA M fA

u7 M C7 O1 p a0 W O O
ry N M M O p T W W O O p

9i O ai N N
N N M
QM1 M r dN
Qi M u5

fV fV M C7

b9 u3 E9 V 69 d fl fA ER b9 Fy V3 t3 fri
I

r C
C
C i
I

O Ql
Y
U 1
c
Q1 r
cn

y 7nx
l1J y
E
N r
N
Vl

N
W
XQX 7 N
E

r 7

m
o
U
G
ro
m m v
1
u E N

m
m a N
rn
m 9
L v

cg
rn
ro
m
N 9 N 9 O C N 7 7 9 9 G N 7
1
LIMITATIONS AND OTHER CONCERNS

to provide unbiased estimate for the cost of two alternatives for Riverton
It was the intent of this study an

There several limitations that should be noted regarding the

sprimary culinary water source
City are

data and findings ofthis study

I Projections for the culinary

population projections made by
water usage are based on the current average use for

U Census Bureau and the Wasatch Front

the S Regional Council as
each connection and

2008 The rate increases used

reported in the Riverton City Culinary Water System Muster Plan Update
used for
for operation costs were assumed based on average historical cost data The rate increases
These rates will actually vary based on the
purchased water from JVWCD were assumed to be constant
casts for system upgrades to make the switch to Alternative 2 were
peaking factor The
peak usage
estimated without detailed research and analysis These costs may be substantially higher A detailed
ascertain these costs The user rates were
modeling study would need to be conducted to adequately
oughout the City If the City were to accept Alternative 2 and establish water
a
assumed to be the same tlu
rate system similar to the one that it currently has rate increases to customers in higher pressure zones

would be higher than those reported in this study

Some additional concerns should be addressed before establishing that Alternative 2 is feasible The main
concern regards the fate ofthe s s water rights that are not
City water rights The portions of the City
of seven years would be forfeited for nonuse Utah Code Section 73 4 outlines the
1
used for a period
rules regarding nonuse of water rights A copy of this section is in Appendix C Even if the City does not
lase these water rights it would lose the water rights to the effluent created from the culinary water that it
of a use project Another concern that should
would otherwise have proposed waste
as a result water re

be explored before deciding to alter the

public culinary water supply is the overall opinion of the public
Most complaints on culinary water come when there is a significant change in the properties ofthe water
such as total dissolved solids Therefore it would be expected that the majority sculinary
ofRiverton

water customers would notice the difference in the taste of the water under Alternative 2 and perceive this

difference as a bad taste

CONCLUSION

s primary culinary water source production

Concerns regarding the water quality from Riverton City
the City to have this conducted The cost to operate the culinary water system
wells encouraged study
for rates were estimated to cover these
under two alternatives was projected year period and user
a ten

costs The total cost for Alternative 2 was 57 higher than Alternative 1 The user rates to cover these
5

costs under Alternative 2 were also greater with sharper rate increases each year to continue
significantly
to cover costs This study is limited to a general feasibility determination If the City decides that

Alternative 2 is more feasible more detailed studies would be needed to determine all of the necessary

upgrades required to put the system online Financial studies would also be needed to more accurately
water
plan for the increased costs of operating the culinary system

Page 16
 APPENDIX A
WATER QUALITY REPORTS

1
 44 r

1 t

2007
Riverton City Corporation Riverton City is dedicated to serving its citizens with quality water and is pleased to
12830 South Redwood Road present its Water Quality Keport for 2007 According to the 1996 Safe Drinking
Water Act every community is required to provide a report on he water quality every
r

Riverton lJtah 84065

12 months This report contains important information regarding the quality of your i
drinking water r
City Oti
icials
BillApplegarth Mayor
Randy Brinkerhoff Council member Riverton City water is composed of water from wells within Riverton City and water
Alan Leavitt Council member provided from Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District Sources of drinkiug water both
Brad Markus Council member tap water and bottled water include rivers lakes streams ponds reservoirs springs
Karma Bentson Council member and wet Is As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground it dis

Roy Tingey Council member solves minerals and in some cases radioactive material and can pick up substances
Lance Blackwood City Manager resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity The following tables Y
below and on back side of sheet show the results of our monitorhtg for the period of
Water Aepartment Jan 1
thru December 31s 2007

Scott Hill Water Director

Duane Green Culinary Supervisor Because Riverton obtains most of its water from underground wells the risk of con
Contamination due to overland travel is mmtmal

In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink the F

PA prescribes regulations which

limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems

fll
L
IiIti
ARNI
Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population hnmune compromised persons such
as
persons with cancer un

dergoingchemotherapy persons who have undergone organ transplants people with HIV AlD5 or other immune system disorders some elderly and infants can he

particularly at risk from infections these people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers EPA
CD guidelines nn appropriate
Water Hotline 426
800
1
4791
means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptnsporidium and other microbial contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking

ICeyislucatedonbackpage
EN It 1V
t
X
t0I1 y 11111171R1
fCe1 tNf7
lf Groundwater
Source

Contaminant Units MC MCL MIN MAX EX Likely Source

Comments ONI
ATFNC
L G CEEI Y
Ml
IviAX 1
A
I
R NTE1
PC

EsteRepartedet
C9lidad del
Total Coliform 8actcria
Less Ati
NA So than No Nalurfllly occurring in the environment POf3bl0 COntip
5 walisoa infor
in

Turbidity For Ground Water NTIJ 5 TT 0 9

0 No Suspended material front soil runoff Ci641 soure la c
t
a d del
xVAI
q
3L 113

ed
Us consume

ofnatural and roan

made deposds Por favor haE
l
PCB Decay a
Emitters IS 0 0 S No
Alpha L gttZ alguien d
L7ecay of natural and man
made deposits cbntlanza I
pCi 50 0 U 12 No
su
Beta Emitters L traduzca elcon
tenido del mif un

Erosion of naturally Rc
No occurring deposits
Arsenic L
mb 010
0 U OOI
O 003
0
runoff from orchards

Erosion of
L
mg naturally occurring deposits
0
2 D
Z U
D 1
0 Nn
Barium

from steel and pulp mills

L
mg Discharge
Chromium 100
0 100
0 000
0 003
0 No
Erosion ofnatural de sits

l
mg Erosion ofnaturally occurring deposits
2
1 No and from fertilizers Fluoride
Fluoride 0
4 0
4 3
0 discharges
added at source

Runoff from fertilizers leaching from

L
ng
No septic tanks and
Nitrate As Nitrogen D
ID 0
10 0
1 2
4 naturally occurring
oceanic material

from fertilizers
Runot7 leaching fiom
ppg
0 10 No mtd
Nitrate As Nitrogen 1000 1000 septic tanks naturally occurring
urpanic material

m1Jt ETOSion of naturally occurring deposits

05
0 QU5 0 UI
U No
Salemium

Erosion of
L
mg naturally occurring deposits
and runoff from road deicing
Sodium NE NE 0 S
IG No

Erasion of
L
mL naturallyoccurrinGdeposits
000 NF 8S2 IDID Na
fD5
fotalDissolvcdSolids

Corrosion of household plumbing systems

Lead 00
0 ND 014
0 Nn
L
mg UI S erosion of natty ally occumng d
posrts

Corrosion ofhousehold plumbine systems

Copper myL 3 30
1 NU 30
D No erosion of naturally occurring deposits

indicate that water poses rist ritore infmnraiion about wnt

unmants attd
potential Health ell
eas con be obl wined by sthe
callin Enclronmental Protection Al
r
gls ha presence of cantartuuarns does not necessarily health
a
M
e Drinking Wntcr ullind al I RUU
s 5al 4971
42E
 Jordan V
t lley Water Conservancy istrict Water QuaEity Summary 4roundwaterand5miaceWater
Sowre

Contaminant Units MC MC M1N MAyC EXCEED LikelySource

Comments
4 LG MAX
rr

Total Coliform Bacteria Positive Not 0 0 60

0 NO All repeat samples were negative no viola
ermonth S lions were issued

Turbidity for Ground NTU S

3
0 TT 0 3
0 NO MCL is 0
3for surface aterand
a 0 for
5
Water Surface Water 0 groundwater
EPA requies
monitoring of ri i i

over 80 drinking
AI ha Emitters L
Ci 0
15 NE 0
D 4
6 NO Deca of natural and man
made de sits
contaminants
Beta Emitters L
Ci 0
50 NF 0 0
5 NO Ucca of natural and man
made de sits
The contami
Radon Emitters L
Ci NE NE 1191 1750 NO Naturall occurrn in soil
cants listed in
the tables on

both pages are Arsenic L

mg 01
0 0 001
0 003
0 NO Erosion of naturally occuring deposits and
the only ones runoft from orchards

detected in your Barium L

mg 0
2 0
2 0 1
0 NO Erosion of naturall occuring deposits
water Fora Erosion of
Fluoride L
mg 0
4 0
4 3 2
1 NO naturally occuring deposits and
complete list call discharges from fertilizers Fluoride added
the Division Of at source

Water Quality at Mercury L

mg 00
0 00
0 00
0 10
0 NO Errosion of naturally occurring deposits
801 6146
538 2 2 and runoff from landfills
Riverton City Runoff from
Total Nitrate c4r Nitrite L
mg 0
10 0
10 0 2
4 NO fertilizer leaching from septic
also receives
tanks naturally occurring organic mate
wafer from Jor
riot
don Valley yVa Sulfate L
mg 1000 NE 19 49 NO Erosion of naturally occuring deposits
ter Conservancy
Selenium I
mg 05
0 05
0 0 01
0 NO roston of
E naturally occurring deposits
District fora
complete assess Sodium L
mg NE NE 0 5
16 NO Erosion of naturally occurring deposits and i

ment rultoff from road deicing

Total Dissolved Solids L

mg 2000 NE 26 32D NO Erosion of naturally occurring deposits and I
TUS from road dcicin
runoff

Corrosion of household plumhing systems ero

Lead 015
0 0 ND 014
0 NO
mglL Sion of naturall uccurrin d osits

Corrosion of household plumbing s

systeir ern
3
1 L3D NU 30
D NO
oppzr
C 1
mg lion pf naturall occurrin de osits
Ey
1
Action Level ALI The concentration of a contaminant which ifexceeded triggers
Treatment or other requirements which a water system must fallow

Maximum containment Level MCL The Maximum Allowed is the highest level
Of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water MCIs are set as close to the
MCLGs as feasible using the best available water trearinent technology

Maximum Containment Level Goal MCLG The Goal is the level of a contaminant
in drinking water below which there is no known or
expected risk to health MCLGs
allow for a margin of safety
n
vear millirems per year
mretn a measure of radiation absorbed by the body
N None Established t i

NTU Nephelometric Turbidity Units describe water clarity

CPJI picocuries per liter a measure of radioactivity
m
o
parts per million or micrograms per liter Same as one minute in 2 years
t
pDb darts per billiota or micrograms per liter Same as one minute in 2
000 years
t parts per trillion or nanograms per liter Same as one penny in 10 000
echnigue TT A treatment technique is a required process intended to
1
Treatment
reduce the level of acontaminant in drinking water

UR Unregulated at this time

ND None Detected

acts about 12
iverton Water
Riverton City has some of the least
expensive culinary water in the
State of Utah
The secondary water system will
improve the life span ofthe culinary
r
system
Riverton City provides water to

1 i
t
w
more

Riverton
than 600 service connections

City hosts over 140 miles

of culinary pipeline
Culinary water meets State Fed
eral water quality standards

Water comes from undergr

nund
r

wells Jordan Valley Water Con

servancy District

1
 i o
Jl F L
n
O Q
O

J K
U

cOptl
A
l

O
F
O

n F v 7

R
C
O
O
A 7
O
T
Q
C11 Q
k 3 p V O

w e 7 r 7 O
70 p O

r
ri
r tO
O

u G r

H o 5 oNO c3 A
r s
C i
a
W L ar
w 7

a
O o
q a C w
ya is
o a

O o a 3 se o u ca o

N N

Y C y
b F
a tv
on

r cd

3
car
a
a
c
c ev
o
a
o

v O

as ro u w 3 W

oe
d

Q N
U C7
C7 c
ro
3
o

J a mss
1
C

ea Q
q r C
y nj
h
w

C3 7a
C a7 y o
m cC
v
G
aO W 6oaa
 n
a a o
y ai v n
Q
y id
T 3 w v y 3 i

w v cd

F
3 O v s cCC
y
b x
N
w A p z

y 3 eta i
o
v
y
1
y C y v N v p N
y bA U r vi y E Cd O

y 7e
T

O
ayi
C
y

7
G
c U C v
L
y cd O

vo 3
ec
o v
3 v h
y v
a
rn
4a d
o 0 3 o a
v v
z z Z i

O
v

7 r
3
N
p ca n
p
p id
L
U
y
cC
K
3
p
W
O
v
C
ca

y r3

C
t
cd v v o 3 ny ca i c3 N U
y

v
n
o
a a p w
G Q t 4 j
n E
b r h
o as
v 3 ca a Cs q

m
u o o
Y

3 ci

fL

K
a

i
 a I
A

rte

y q
W

1
A
s

o
r 2

a i
A dom r

J
7 b w
y
Rai
1
G U w a 7

e0
A a U

H D
7 y y b T

Q
c n O N

3
u
p U
cttrJ 3 U

O A
W N

w Q
N is
y C d

o 3
w a ova cn c a
v

a
aw c

4 ar v ea b u m o v en
a v a L
a v p a a
v

a G

3 c 3
b c vG v oo d
Y Y o
w y
v a ci o o a o w

Y
ca 7 v
n p
b vi 0 3 y c w o c u o c v a o

cd is U
b
N cc

7 Z
m

L
p
pq
a
p 4
o
v y v

c O
V
a
v m
i
4a
e n
m y
y G G
Q LX v

b E c
C 3
cvi o vai
c Z m a a w
 w y V di w
J q p 3
e4 G
Y ro
G
Ct L
ca rn
j r

c q Q y O c O

ca CA y 7 c rU
p
a cr c o p C nf
b o
a
a

p O
Qp cj p
3 A Q c0 r v 3 O
vy

i S
w jd
S
rn a C
C a
i cwi G V v y w
j
w
7r o
r w rJ w
C rJ
y O 3 G C
4
n O C
w
w

o
y

p 3 h
e p 4 c U y a a
c b 7p o w

ae 3 c o
o p
ccs c
t Q a Q

s5s
4
y c
A Ow C
a L U ice a 3
w
q
04
c
w

i w
r G h 1 p p rj O
C
ytcotl p

G rn
O O G O ZS y
Q
Y
b w C4 cE C v
7 j ctl c
O w T N 7 5
O
C L

v e b v co vi
O q
a
T
w
q a v cs cc 4

r
r

U
D a H ca c G C
s L
w ca
C
p O 4

j W p
w
C7
O
O ttl U n7 W
Gl p m O L3 Q L C
cd

G p q w w U d w
4
b cJ p T U
o

w u

p c C a
i r9i T F O
v O G L w
ti U

y w CL 3 w a3

i s

i a l

F tia

C
f 1

rr
I
1
k i
i
z1

I
 b v
o c

i Y E
c

v Y O
a

b n
N V b
J rt3
o a fl

a a

n
r
I a
3 L
a v rn c

c o
a

r
r
C C
J
Q rev C ro

v
y j 3
C
s C7
p D
Lal
n a n
a
x
N V C d ro T3 4J
a o

N
Y

N fi o
V
y p v n

ul FA U ro H
a
G 0 0 vet E rn o
d y
a z a ac v r G r r N

a 9 ro a
a c c c

a
e a
m
r
vtr
T
o
v
ro
N
a

C
ro y v b O
C
O
N O
UG O Q t0

a
U
p m bA c OO 7 a
C ca
c

Q rot
V

L
N C O o
of L7 O u

3
c c 300 oo
o L
p ov y
e v
mo
i c

O b V N
ro
Q
Q vi d L O
O o o
YO
c c
Y cc
a c O
p1
c c r c is y o
rw
y y rs
c
O
3 a
o
C ia
i ro p 3 cy p a o a 3 c a

O b a a w c ro C
v p U a aroi v
q a b o v T i
a Y v rE o a v V c a a
v
G
p
U v h
7 ro O v 7 9 v
ty y
C
5 d
O N d
a
0
T a c
a z
rn
o o a tea
ra v w b v o s a
o o c c
U p
b0 U O C t
j O i
U U td i V1 J Z

3
o U v G o uA 4 to
ro u a T G1
O y L

o
a

U c c v c c o U
c
 G
ti
u
V
p
4
N V m r

C
W Oi Oa i
y O p 3c
a v
Ey
c i
z

N s b a
w
o V G
payy n c E
q
N V C 4
CC
O

a
w a p o o
a
o a
V
D
V E
Q p a a
m
vE
v
2 m a r 3 R
o a v

b
p i
rS
ry NO r n

ate
R
N
Z
a
P
N r4 G
ate N a

O O O O O O O O O O o a

W q E j o

V u v D v yya g i
a v a v c
F o Y7
5 a i7 O ZS Y3 O a O O 9
O
O 6 O 6 O

t 01 a GI O O L71 Q d1 Yh L71 O 3 01 q1 4 Ol T C
i7
Y
c C G o
C C C C C
p C C J C C C C C C
o G

J 3 tl J 7 7 3 J J 3 9 7 3 j J J 7 L C

J v
U
V
C V 4 v
V V

V
V V
E 9 U V
v
V V O d

E
n
d

v
q p
11 1U 1V X7 T
E p C

T
O
VP jyp 1D
C 2i T
T T T N T S C v O T
p
C
T C ryx
m m rn ip e iC
5r iC b A A q A
0C
J

r i r r v C
a r d 7 ate
w A A y A N
i0 0

Q N

c
7 b
E A

j C N
C C C q C G C
E C C C C
v C C C C C n q
O O p O O O O
O Q O y O O O O vOi O N
W G C C
O
C C C C D C C C C a C C C C
T

0
p p O t O
O O O O Q O O O
C
E v O q
m q O O
g
p
J ti
o
W
o
W
o
W
o 0
W ry W
0
W
0
W CG
m o
W
0 0
W
o
W N
g E
o
W
a
UJ
a o o
W
o
W a
v
Q C

J O W O W O W W W W
O
U N 4 Z Z a Z p Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z z z Z Z
Z O
Q

O N
N O v1
Q 1 O oo
u o O w 4 W O W p W fQ QQQ 4 yy
rl
f tr1 CI
fV Z O Z Z Z C vl
C
6 d 4
O p
4
ry ry1
d
y fy
O 1
Z
0
p

W
N

j O O O i
r O
iO 06 N
a b q
r Vd Z
O
Q o p Q 4

A rv o
n n rv vi

U 0 0 O
ca o
o o n m yr
w

o rn
o c5
ao q
o

1
a
ci z o
o
Z Z o
n z
2 V
z
4
T

t7 o rn rn rn a rn a rn rn o rn rn rn rn rn rn p a
o f
v
E E E z E E E
E E E E E E E P E a

o
a
3 i
o
E
a L

O
E n L

Y rn E w
E v
b z gy m
v o w c ran v
o
N Q
s
a
o
o
3
ro
v
u
n a v a
L o
o
ro 7C
io

Q m 4 V li a Z h try spry vii 1 uq Q U V U n nl Fb

I
i
 o
I
a

0 B z
0 a

T T
CD Q

7
C C

a a
i
n a v a
a

a
y
c o y
Y
a a rn v
c
a
Fn rn o

r U
rn
D
3

MC
rC
y

O
C CP
6
y
4
N w m b1 b
ry P
L
A

o 0 o o g
a a 0
s a o
s a
a a a
ro
o

V y a v a a a a a a v a
d O Q V q O 9 O Z7 G C
m
m a
rv
g
i
c c c c m e E E E
O O O
w
j 7 7 j aa 7 N b p C C fc

A
r V v u v u V u a yV
p
c
C N C v a 0 a

Ch Ci G1 T 1 T T T T p c G
T H GAL a
A p A C R
y
S L

f
F io o
C ro v
6 is b C C L
n
C
3 iv O O
a r 7 a O 7 N N aa o
V V V C V tb C O C b D
V d T ro 0 V r t Z

Z u u t
O c c c c c c
c c 3 q S
a
c o 3 o

a i o o

g as c
c c c c c O
0 0 o z
E O O O O O E O
L fTO j Y
O O

nnG
Y Y

ry
Z Z Z Z W z W W LA W W W W A A Z
JC Z V

W
W W W W W W W 1
A W d W M
J W W W W W W W W W W W
2 Z Z Z Z Z
l U Z Z Z Z z Z Z 2 Z Z Z d

z ac
V
c x s ac ac a or x a o w o o n
7 a vi Z co p
J
Q
Q

E
m

t
W

j
a m gyp rv m o o n m rv m m n rv a
ova m ran
n
o o
p iI N p n n O ry
p ry p O N nl V M tdri Cj O p
0 v

O O iA Q

Y
o a 4
ro

m c e o m
u n r N v co m rv a o
N t
CO ry 6
v n hNl m m
ry 9 O Z Z
n m

Q n
Q i N Z Z Z Q m n
o
OC ado O n rv

rv ao
C o
o Z o
a

ri

J a J
J J J
J J J J
J J J J J
J J
J
a
E
Q1 S1 Q O1 Q O CJ1 Qi 01 m m Q1 4 a7 Qf U a1 C71 A pl q1 41
U V l1
E E E E E E E E E E E E a a a cx y E E E E
E Ey 4
a

Y
3
v E

V a o rv
v v v

u
v

Y
r
d y Zf
c

m o
3 E 0
0 c E Y N a
c c

E
o aa c m c a O n

4
a
d N w a
o
b itl C
rn
Y o N v C O C C w
a Q O t7
C U Ov

Q O O O
Y Y O a O m O m
w i 7 V
a

4 Q a U U V 2Q a a in in Z l7 l7 rx F z V F i
 o

Y Q
y
V
r

z
ro
v

ti
o w U p
o 3
3

p
4

C G

7
C 0o cd

w y d
o

o
m p
u c o
a v Ci
i v x
o

V1

ry
V V N
Y w

end o

p
v c

n
act w p

a w b m v y o v
r y

ro U y v a y 7
r fir

C ca
u Jt o
C3 4r d
y j w U in m
O N v

a oO x
o ni
n 3 eui u i
a 3
v

z ro r

O o N N
j i j
 APPENDIX B
dV WCD DOCUMENTS

i
i
1
1
i
1
1
 JORDAN VALLEY WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT

RULES AND REGULATIONS

FOR WHOLESALE WATER SERVICE

Revised Effective as of May 26 2004

1
1

1
 JORDAN VALLEY WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRIGT

RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR WHOLESALE WATER SERVICE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1 1J1

POLICY GUIDELINES FOR ADMINISTRATION OF

WHOLESALE WATER DELIVERY CONTRACTS 11

1 PURPOSE 1
2
1 CONTRAGT CATEGORIES 1
3
1 PRIORITIES AMONG CONTRAGTS 1
4
1 APPROVAL OF NEW CONTRACTS 1
5
1 PAY CONTRACT AMOUNTS
APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE TAKE
OR 2
1
6
1 GUIDELINES FOR NEW CONTRACTS 1
2
7
1 USE OF WHOLESALE WATER DELIVERED BY THE DISTRICT 1
2
8
1 DEFERRED DELIVERY OF PURCHASED WATER 12

CHAPTER 2 1
J
2

WATER RATES CHARGES AND FEES 1

2

1
2 PRICE STRUGTURE 21

2 METER BASE CHARGES

FLAT FEES 1
2

CHAPTER 3 1
3

INVOICES AND PAYMENT 1

3

1
3 METER READING 1
3
2
3 PAYMENT OF INVOICES 3
1

CHAPTER 4 1
4

WHOLESALE METER POLICY 1

4

1
4 OBJECTIVES 1
4
2
4 NEW METER STATIONS 4
1
3
4 MAINTAINING FLOW RATES WITHIN METER CAPACITIES 4
2
4 CONDITIONS 2
4
5
4 ACCESS OPERATION MAINTENANCE AND OWNERSHIP 4 2
6
4 COST SHARING 42

CHAPTER 5 1
5

MISGELLANEOUS POLICIES 5
1

1
5 JORDAN AQUEbUCT LICENSE AGREEMENT FEES 5
1
2
5 LEASES OF DISTRICT REAL PROPERTY TO CUSTOMER AGENCIES
1
5

APPENDIX A 1
A

CATEGORIES AND PRIORITIES OF WATER DELIVERY CONTRACTS 1

A
 CHAPTER 1

POLICY GUIDELINES FOR ADMINISTRATION OF

WHOLESALE WATER DELIVERY CONTRACTS

1 PURPOSE

The purpose of this chapter is to clarify the relationship of various categories of wholesale water

delivery contracts for cases in which water supply limitations may exist The policy clarifies the
relationship and priorities among retail and wholesale water deliveries It also clarifies relationships
between contracts for water delivery to lands within District boundaries and contracts far deliveries to

lands outside District boundaries

2
1 CONTRACT CATEGORIES

The District is party to water delivery contracts with various agencies municipalities districts

departments of state government and private companies These are categorized in categories A
through G These categories are further described in Appendix A

Contracts which include a minimum annual purchase amount are described as take pay
or
contracts Most District water delivery contracts have perpetual terms However some fixed
term
in the contract categories set forth in
contracts are currently in place These are described

Appendix A
I

3
1 PRIORITIES AMONG CONTRACTS
IC
define contract amounts or minimum
The water delivery contracts between the District and recipients
annual volumes to be delivered by the District Most contracts also include contract capacities or

peak day flow rates at which the District contracts to deliver the contract volumes

Shortages in water supply could exist from time to time These shortages may involve a limitation of
water supply volume to meet all demands They may also involve limitations in peak source capacity
or peak infrastructure conveyance pumping or storage capacity Furthermore capacity limitations
could occur throughout the District transmission system or within localized sections of that
transmission system

The various contract categories are assigned priorities in descending order in Appendix A For
example a number priority is ahead of a number 2 priority Various subcategories within a single
1

contract category for example Al and A2 share a priority level

Water and water capacity will be allocated to contract before deliveries

supply higher priority parties
are made to lowerpriorities shortage Allocations may be made far water supply volume
in times of
or for water
and delivery peak capacity Contract subcategories will share proportionally to their
contract volumes and capacities in the case of a limitation in water supply or peak capacity except as

otherwise set forth in Appendix A

4
1 APPROVAL OF NEW CONTRACTS

A the categories of existing and potential future water delivery contracts or

lists
Appendix
by the District The intent of this policy is that future contract requests will fall within
arrangements
one of these categories Each new contract is subject to review and approval by the Board of
Trustees New contract requests may be approved by the Board of Trustees if the Board determines

they are in the District

s best interest

1
5
1 APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE TAKE
Y CONTRACT AMOUNTS
PA
OR

Take contracts for water delivery by the District cannot be reduced unilaterally by either party
pay
or
during the term of the contract The Board of Trustees may consider an application to reduce atake
pay contract amount The Board of Trustees will not approve such a reduction unless another
or
agency applies for a new contract or a contract increase in an equal or greater quantity In this case
the Board of Trustees may approve the reduction and the increase simultaneously ifthey find that the
reduction is in the best interest of the District Limitations and conditions to such a reduction include
the following

5
1 A reduction in contract volume must include a corresponding proportional reduction in

contract capacity

2
5
1 The reduction of contract volume is limited to the amount of the new or increased contract
amount by another customer which may be approved by the Board of Trustees
with the reduction
simultaneously

3
5
1 The reduction of contract capacity must be at least as great as the contract capacity increase
of the new or increased contract approved simultaneously by the Board of Trustees except
for variations in maximum day factors between the two customer agencies

6
1 GUIDELINES FOR NEW CONTRACTS

The District may enter into Category A perpetual wholesale water sales contracts only with the State
ortowns Category A wholesale
of Utah political subdivisions of the State special districts cities and

water sales shall not have annual minimum contract delivery amounts of less than
agreements
500 acre
feet

A sales contracts that were executed prior to September 27 2000 will continue to be
Category
honored for contract agencies which are not the State of Utah political subdivisions of the State
special districts cities or towns and for contracts with annual minimum contract delivery amounts of
less than 500 acre
feet

7
1 USE OF WHOLESALE WATER DELIVERED BY THE DISTRICT

Water delivered by the District to a wholesale contract customer shall be used only within the

boundaries of the District for contract categories A1 A2 B1 C1 C2 C3 and D1

8
1 EFERRfD DELIVERY OF PURCHASED WATER

8
1 A wholesale customer that does not take delivery during any calendar year of all of its
minimum amount of water allotted for purchase under its water purchase agreement with
the District may take delivery in the immediately following calendar year of so much of the
amount not taken as doss oat exceed five percent 5 of its alto ted minimum purchase

amount Dsfsrred Water provided that i calculation of the amount of Deferred Water
shall not include any water besides the minimum amount allotted for purchase specifically

excluding the additional water a customer may purchase at its discretion ii water cannot
be deferred from any calendar year in which the customer is to take delivery of Deferred
Water from a prior ysar iii deferral is subject to water availability and system capacity as

reasonably determined by the District iv Deferred Water shall have a priority in the year of
its delivery which is lower than the priority of the minimum amount of water allotted that year
for purchase v the customer may take delivery of Deferred Water only after it has taken

delivery of all of the minimum amount of water allotted

to it for purchase that calendar year

to be for this policy the customer shall at all relevant times be in

and vi eligible
compliance with the terms and conditions of its water purchase agreement with the District
specifically including payment of manias and fees owed the District
2
1
 2
8
1 If a wholesale customer takes delivery of its water allotment from the District over a fiscal
shall be
year then all references in the preceding paragraph to calendar year replaced
with fiscal yeas that includes the period from July 1 through June 30

3
1
 CHAPTER2

WATFR RATES CHARGES AND FEES

1
2 PRICE STRUCTURE

Appendix A For categories A B C and D

The price structure for contract categories is set forth in

the structure involves one of the following

price

1
2 A formula defined in the contract which follows the American Water Works Association

AWWA extra capacity method as updated annually in a wholesale water rate study
base

by the District

1
2 The annual retail water price as determined by an annual water rate study performed by
the District

3
1
2 As otherwise set forth in previous contracts or court orders

E1 and G1 involve formulas which can be calculated at the time

Gertain other categories including
of need

2 METER BASE CHARGES

FLAT FEES

Meter base shall be charged monthly to each active wholesale and retail meter
flat fees
charges
regardless of the actual volume of water taken through the meter The charges recover in part the
s expenses associated with the meter including but not limited to meter reading account
District
service and maintenance repair replacement and other overhead items For all wholesale
billing
customers the charges will constitute the flat fee defined in the water purchase agreements and
will the fee of 00
10per
month
beginning on January 1 2004 these charges replace existing flat
000 gpm installed meter capacity
1

METER SIZE BASE CHARGE

FIAT FEE

8
5 4
3 50
2

1 35
3

2
1 15
4

2 65
6

3 50
12

4 85
20

g 65
41

g 00
65

10 00
95

12 00
140

14 00
190

16 00
250

1 00
315

24 00
560

30 00
875

1
2
 CHAPTERS

INVOICES AND PAYMENT

1
3 METER READING

Wholesale meter stations will be read twice a month Real time monitoring may be installed from time
to time the District for peak period monitoring Meter reading and real time monitoring data will be
by
made available to customer agencies upon request

2
3 PAYMENT OF INVOICES

An invoice shall be due and within 30 from the date the invoice is received by
1
2
3 payable days
the customer agency

2
3 An invoice that is not paid by its due date will be considered delinquent and shall incur and
of one
interest charge percent per month 12 APR on the delinquent balance

1
3
 CHAPTER4

WHOLESALE METER POLICY

1
4 OBJECTIVES

The of this chapter are follows

objectives as

A To encourage and assist existing wholesale customers to purchase additional water from

the District

B To obtain new wholesale water customers for the District

C To share certain and financial requirements for wholesale customers to receive

capital
additional wholesale water deliveries from the tistrict

in meter station costs that avoids unfair

D To provide a uniform method for District participation
or uneven subsidies among District wholesale customers

E To avoid avast policy which encourages wholesale customers to proliferate

participation
meter stations along the District transmission system in preference to constructing customer
internal distribution system improvements

F To resolve ownership access operation and maintenance issues

G To set forth criteria for wholesale meter stations and

acceptable design

wholesale meter station

H To define customer responsibilities and Qistrict remedies for keeping
peak flow rates within meter capacities for accurate operation

2
4 NEW METER STATIONS

A New Customers For a new wholesale water customer which joins the District and executes
a water District engineer will provide the Board of Trustees for their
purchase contract the s
approval an estimate of the District
s shared costs The District will pay 50 percent of the

capital cost of one meter station with a limit of 1

00
0 00 per ten acre
feet ofwater purchase
contract amount

B Existing Customers The District will finance up to 50 percent of the capital cost of each new

wholesale meter station with a limit of 000 per ten acre

1
00 feat of increased water
contract amount corresponding to the new meter station capacity Financing shall
purchase
not exceed ten years The cost shall be amortized and billed to the customer agency on a

monthly basis No interest will be charged the customer agency

C Ex and Ca acit of Existin Meter Stations The District will finance up to 50 percent of the
i

capital cost of
expanding the capacity of each wholesale meter station with a limit of
000 en acre
1
00per feet of increased water purchase contract amount which specifically

corresponds to the meter station capacity increase The agency will repay the District
s
financed capital by means of a surcharge on the District
s monthly billing to the wholesale

customer The customer may make monthly payments of up to ten years No interest shall
accrue on the debt

1
4
3
4 MAINTAINING FLOW RATES WITHIN METER CAPACITIES

It shall be the responsibility of each customer agency to ensure that peak flow rates at its wholesale
meter stations do not exceed meter capacities and that meter station capacities are increased if

higher peak flows are needed The District reserves the right to throttle or close isolation valves to
meter stations if customers do not maintain their flows within meter station capacities Such
peak
of isolation valves will occur only after notification to the customer by the District
throttling or closing

4 CONDITIONS

of any
The following conditions apply to the initial construction or subsequent capacity expansion
wholesale meter station

rates are of
A The wholesale meter station location and delivery subject to the availability
District system capacity as determined by a District engineering review

B Meter stations may be expanded for additional capacity only if the expanded facilities meet

District design requirements for accurate metering and

coordination shall meet the criteria and

C All meter statian design review and design
guidelines as explained in the District
s Wholesale Meter Station Requirements and
B of this policy Capital costs of new or expanded
Guidelines located in Appendix
wholesale meter stations include engineering costs all of which shall be paid by the

wholesale customer except as

provided for in Section 4
2 above

5
4 ACCESS OPERATION MAINTENANCE AND OWNERSHIP

A Access Both the District and the customer agency have right of access to each wholesale

meter station

and fittings
B Operation and Maintenance The District shall operate and maintain all piping
upstream of the wholesale meter station and within the meter station downstream to and

including the meter If however a pressure or flow control valve pump or miscellaneous
of the it shall be and maintained by the customer
device exists upstream meter operated
agency The customer agency shall operate and maintain all piping and fittings downstream
of the meter and the flow or pressure control valve pump or miscellaneous device wherever
it exists The downstream valve will be operated by the District as required to maintain

piping meters and fittings owned by the District

C Ownership The District and the customer agency shall each own the same piping and

fittings which they operate and maintain In addition the vault and structural appurtenances
shall be owned jointly by the District and the customer agency

6
4 COST SHARING

sharing any meter costs described in this policy the District shall enter into a
Prior to the District

contract with the customer agency containing terms compatible with this policy Each contract will

require Board approval for authorization

I
I

2
4
 CHAPTER 5

MISCELLANEOUS POLICIES

1
5 JORDAN AQUEDUCT LICENSE AGREEMENT FEES

The District shall 00 fee from a Jordan Aqueduct license agreement

charge and collect a 150
applicant prior to reviewing and processing any proposed Jordan Aqueduct license agreement

2
5 LEASES OF DISTRICT REAL PROPERTY TO CUSTOMER AGENCIES

s Board of Trustees may approve leases of District property or granting

The District rights
way
of
or easements across real property owned by the District to wholesale customer
and agencies for
purposes of
pumping or otherwise taking delivery of District water under a wholesale water purchase

agreement The following guidelines apply

easement ar
1
2
5 The lease right will not impair
way
of the District
s existing use or any
foreseeable future use of the subject property

2
5 way shall be for a fixed term nat to exceed 20 years The
The lease easement or right
of
lease may be renewed after its expiration as agreed to by the District and Lessee

3
2
5 If the District at some future time determines that the subject lease property is needed for
District purposes the Lessee will vacate the subject property and remove all facilities which
would interfere with the District
s intended use or secure such other alternative real property
as necessary for District uses completely at Lessee
s cost

4
2
5 The Lessee or Grantee will be responsible to construct and maintain buildings and
landscaping improvements which are architecturally compatible with the District
s existing
and future improvements or as otherwise directed by the District or by a municipal planning
and zoning jurisdiction

2
5 The Lessee or Grantee shall agree to a reciprocal arrangement in which a comparable lease
easement way will
of
orright be granted to the District on any of Lessee
s real property if the

District identifies an existing or future need for such a lease easement or way
of
right

6
2
5 If Lessee has a category Al wholesale water purchase contract with the District the District
will not require compensation for the lease other than nominal consideration for the lease
easement or way
of
right

Far District will

7
2
5 agencies with other than category Al wholesale water purchase contracts the
require market value compensation for the lease easement orright
way
of

8
2
5 of a lease easement orright
way is subject to approval by the District Board of
of
Any grant
Trustees after a determination that such a grant is in the best interest of the District

9
2
5 The Board may place other conditions deemed necessary lease
as or
appropriate on any
easement orright
way
of

1
5
 L s q
N
U
3 3o 30
1 m
y
C
L
m

3
m
N
C
L
O
m N
rnaa
C L O
N
rn
C
L

r ro Y C t p r p

m ro N
U 1 U N U V U Ui f6 U fn q7 U
3 7 p

on
c c a
a C
3
a
ca
ca ca a

fCd U N fC6 U C
R v ci4 cCa V U
7 fd L l6 L 7 b r
ro
w
X
LS X D 9
C X
0
C C Q7 O
S
O N O N L 7 O X C1 O

U O U
V
N C
N
U
C
U
N U
C
O

6
o o a

U y U N Q
v1 Q NQ
N U
Q
z U

f6

C
d f6
fV

G
N
I

C f N Q Q
N y

C
0
ro Q
y
n C m

U O
w F N m w N N N N

U a r r
v

d
W U
7
U
z W O

d W a N N N y N N N

O p
z
w o
w
a cn

QF
r c r T r N

J
J Q
o om c
j o o N
N Y f N
cam N 4
D a V 1
a aro o m
c n n m mU m a3 m
Q cn to
Q aci a C
w

U
N c0Y Q ni N
TO i
m
X O R
NN 0U O
roa o C
W a m a m 3 m s cY N ti
m y a
ce
R ca
m u
y o p
o
3r
O ca o a rn
a c
3
U E a
O
O
c N C q L
V O y N
N Y
N
tT O C
U cV

p ca m
ti
O cv a c m O c c
ani n mU
nqJ ivy a
U
NmE cs
3
cacd o OEvi
as
O
rov rn o p t a c

w c3m E
0
cc fl
cro roxN

m c

YS
33
3m Ewa
vpia N
3ymc
nw ma
m
a
apn
a
U
Z 3 Q
N

am a
x3a
a U mm ED No
u
c am3 cow Co a
3
v v

U I6 d U V y N
o c e N N O t

00 fV O O N SAC E
O O L COE O
O
O O 7 6 C S O
N Vl O
c
ru 3cvm c
or 3mn c
u u sc tscu
HZ U

U
O
c r n co

Q Q m
zH
UU

1
 N N N
N N
N
Nom LN
N f6

3 O
3 D
y O O d O O
G t h
q ro a ro

CL C N N
N
d N
W 9 O a O
7

v ro
oro
ro ca
m
ro roa
cu co
a
my
m o

c m m c m ro c api ro c N U C n c
m
y c c
a ro s cy
ca L

w x x 3 0 N r
N
a N
n
U
U C
N
U
n T
N
N
O V N
T
A
L4
G

j f T ro A C

n
j c
rs jn Uc di o

U N Q N Q y u1 Q u N
Q
m y m N N
tna N a
ro
n

c
m m
c
m c
a
ca

cn v
d d o
w H N
Z
U i
a Z z Z Z

r
U
w
Q
U

Y m

Z Z 2
0

lf CO
7 M R

1a
m om n
m c
co c a io
v
m
o m
a
m
0 o j v
A c
wx
dO
N N ro
o
L
rot m
a m ro a o
D
6
i
Qrn
EUU
0 Q
ro w
n
in7
C c C
t O
ro
Q
Q 3 0 3 v
m
r N
n

7
oaU
m o o
U
N
y N
O S
N i N
v 0
N C m V
C w yyS N
E c
rn 5
c
E
Q E m
a
mt r ro
mz m v m m c
m F ro v
c mF m m n
m
m c
m
m

c
C ro
c a
a
m
ti
o m Q E 3 o 0
v
o v
a c p c c o c 3 L n N
m

N j p td N n O N
N O V N
N p p 3 E N O S N qNj U N

o
O A c
EA ro E CL
i
c
n a
o E
a
ER ro m ro N a

i p
H ro o U o U 6 ro U ro
a

p
c 3 roh m c nL
a
s3 ro ro
n
v j3 v aai c n rov
r
U
7j E ua m c
U
cn c roU E a7
m
m
a
ro uv g
m m
3 m

O c
jc o o p
ro
c ro m
cNV c m c
C qci m v
c
c E c

L
a
7 U L o
U O a
7
L d
U C
V y C
N fa
n ro N

3
r
ro E
n v
c c ro E m Q
3 rn ca
n
cd
2
c m N
mU m n c
rc a n o a x c c
m N da n

o
U m

o a o e E C aroi m N nd
m 3 N
c U
rnro n m m ro ro c cc N
o U
a
roe C
rn
47 Q
j
ca

t C C Lb
cao O
E
i
a iC
NC L
i

p 4 V C N O G O N ro
j yro 77
0 i O d
E
O
3
O y
E
O
a
C Q7
tL n
U 7 0 N Q S 7 3 7 7 ro
1t
Ua n v tLa ca
ti mU v tL
a o o

Ua
U p p W ii
zw
F

U
 N G N N d O
Q1 Vl tq N Vi
ryam N N f6 O R nU
O 2H N to N

1
C a
U
7 7
a
C m t
O O O
jIti U

N
0 N
O
P H 73 R ro U

W
i
a
o
cmmp
m o m

rn p
u

p O C O
U v
m m
m mm m
C7
p
v

r o
Q
m mrn o
w rm
c
m E o

iy
U CO N N
7Q U O

p ro c
or
U N
y
Q
Uc
m

N o G p c

m
NY N

c aro ie m
d
mo o

o o
m a
m 1
v

n o a
m
r

o
Qrn
U Z Z n a
d
r m

o m

c p E
O C N

a wa
H
o
Z
o o t
3 m
Z
w U
a o
Q N
O NvN Q

f6 f0 U TO

3 c E 7
C
aY rn

r
c
o z a a c

t
0 cD

O
m nN N
3 C p U N U
f6 C C W
U

O p h
N CO
O L A U
N N N O N
OC O U
U 7
fd N
C
4
U

N O
w
N
O N U N
G
C U
T C
O U
p Op i
U d
O CU C a L

Ct O
C OU Q7
SL3 J

O
m oU N 3 0
F
d T E E m
m
n a
U
z m r

U
a U
T7 A N N O
L j O a

N y
7 m N
O

Cl
L 4 N
O

A
I
C
O
0
O
4r
O
W N Yt
0
C U N f6
Q T
C
U
O O
N C x O

C
O
7
m
b O V N N ip i can p U
p
U
C
O C C

N N O N O O
N Q
1 O N

tp aT O
N U
Op
C
Q
Q7 7 N Q Ia O p
O 6
r
7f6 4 yN O S N C O x
N
7 7 U 7
Q N N
O

Q Q
N
LL
U
N G
N U U
c
U w U

z w
O
f d a O
p U C
O
O
UU o
U
U U Q
U 7
I
Q D
 APPENDIX C
UTAH STATE CODE

1
 abandonment forfeiture for nonuse within seven
1a4 Reversion
73 to tl
e public by or

years Nonuse application

l As used in this section

Public entity means

a
i the United States

ii an
agency of the United States

the
iii state

state
iv a agency

v apolitical subdivision of the state or

political subdivision of the state

vi an
agency of a

b Public water
supplier means an entity that

i supplies water directly or indirectly to the public for municipal domestic or

industrial use and

is
ii
A a
public entity
water 1 that is
defined in Section 54
2 regulated by the Public
B a
corporation as

Service Commission

C a community water system

I that

Aa supplies water to at least 100 service connections used round residents

by year or

at least 200 year residents and

Bb regularly serves round

II whose voting members

Aa own a share in the community water system
receive water from the community water system in proportion to the member
s
Bb
and
1
share m the community water system
the community water system based the water the member
Cc pay the rate set by on

receives or

D a water users association

at least 70 of the and

I in which one or more public entities own
outstanding shares
local sponsor of a water constructed by the United States Bureau of
II that is a project
Reclamation
 c Shareholder is as defined in Section 73
5
3

Water company is defined in Section 73

5
3
d as

entity that supplies water service for

e Water supply entity means an as a
utility or

irrigation purposes and is also

i a municipality water conservancy district metropolitan water district irrigation

1 district or other public agency

ii a water company regulated by the Public Service Caininission or

any other of a coinrnumty water system

iii owner

2 a When an
ssuccessor in interest abandons
appropriator or the appropriator or

of seven years the water right the

ceases to use all or a
portion of a water right for a
period or

unused portion of that water right is subject to forfeiture in accordance with Subsection c
2

unless the the in interest files a nonuse application

appropriator or s
appropriator successor

with the state engineer

A filed on all portion of the water right
bi nonuse application maybe or a

including water rights held by a water company

ii After giving written notice to the water company a shareholder may file a nonuse

application with the state engineer on the water represented by the stock

c i A water right or a
portiori of the water right may not be forfeited unless a

action to declare the right forfeited is commenced within 15 years from the end of the
judicial
latest period of nonuse of at least seven years

ii If forfeiture is asserted in an action for general deterininatian of rights in

conformance with the of Chapter 4 Determination of Water Rights the year

15
provisions
limitation period shall commence to run back in time from the date the state s
engineer

ination of rights
proposed deteria is served upon each claimant

A decree entered in action for general deterininatian of rights under Chapter 4

iii an

Determination of Water Rights shall bar any claim of forfeiture for prior nonuse
against any
determined to be valid in the decree but does riot bar claim for periods of nonuse that
right a

occur after the entry of the decree

determination the state engineer in action for general

iv A proposed by an
r

determination ofrights under Determination of Water Rights bars claim of

Chapter 4 a

1 forfeiture for prior nonuse against any right proposed to be valid unless a
timely objection has

been filed within the tune allowed in Chapter 4 Determination of Water Rights
action a court declares water right forfeited the date which
v If in a
judicial a on on

the water right is forfeited

the to the water reverts to the public and

A right use

the made available forfeiture

B water
by the
in order of priority date
I first satisfies other water rights in the hydrologic system
and

may be in this title

II second appropriated as provided
abandoned portion of the
d This section applies whether the unused or water or a

water is

to
i permitted to run waste or

used others without of the water right holder

ii by right with the knowledge
e This section does not apply to

i the use of water according to a lease or other agreement with the appropriator or the

ssuccessor in interest
appropriator
ii a water
right if its place of use is contracted under an
approved state agreement or

federal conservation fallowing program

those of time when surface water or groundwater fails to yield

iii periods a source

sufficient water to satisfy the water right

iv a water nght when water is unavailable because of the water s priority date
right
water to store water in a surface reservoir aquifer in accordance with
v a
right or an

Groundwater and Recovery if

Title 73 Chapter 3b Recharge Act

A the water is stored for present or future use or

restraint that the

B storage is limited by a
safety regulatory or
engineering
in interest cannot reasonably correct
appropriator or the appropriator
ssuccessor
water if a water has beneficially used substantially all ofthe water
vi a
right user

within aseven
year period that this exemption does not
apply to the
right provided
 determination of water rights under Chapter 4
adjudication of a water right in a
general
1 Determination of Water Rights
Subsection g a water right
2
vii except as provided by
A I owned by a public water supplier
public water supplier interest in water company or
II represented by a
sownership a

to which the right of use and

III a
public water supplier owns

B conserved or held for the reasonable future water requirement of the public which
is determined according to Subsection f
2
viii a suppleamental water right during a
period of time when another water right
the sufficient water
available to appropriator or the appropriator
ssuccessor in interest provides
to not of the ental water right
supplerr
so as
require use or

water right subject to approved change application where the applicant is

ix a an

diligently pursuing certification

The reasonable future water requirement of the public is the amount of water
fj i
needed in the next 40 years by the persons within the public water supplier
sprojected service

based demand
area on
projected population growth or other water use

ii For purposes of Subsection ia conununity

f
2 water s projected
system service

area

is the served by the community water s

system distribution facilities and
A area

the distribution facilities in

B expands as the community water system expands
accordance with Title 19 Chapter 4 Safe Drinking Water Act

For water right acquired by water after May 5 2008

g a a
public supplier on or

Subsection vii applies if

e
2
i the public water supplier submits a
change application under Section 3 and
73

the state engineer approves the change application

ii
The state engineer shall fiunish form requiring the
3 a anonuse
application
following information
and address of the
i the name applicant
of the water right portion of the water right including the point
ii a
description or a
 of diversion place of use and priority
the of water
iii quantity
iv the period of use

v the extension of time applied for

statement of the for the of the water and
vi a reason nonuse

the state
vii any other information that engineer requires

b i filing the nonuse

application extends the time during which nonuse may

continue until the state issues artier the application

engineer an on nonuse

ii Approval of a nonuse
application protects a water
right from forfeiture for nonuse

from the date until the date

sfiling
application approved application
sexpiration
of the application the state engineer shall publish notice of the
c i Upon receipt a

week for two successive weeks in newspaper of general circulation in the

application once a a

county in which the source of the water supply is located and where the water is to be used

ii The notice shall

state that application has been made and

A an

B specify where the interested party may obtain additional information relating to the

application

d Any interested person may file a written with the state engineer against the
protest
granting of the application
i within 20 daY s after the notice is P ublished if the adjudicative proceeding is

infornal and

ii within 30 days after the notice is published if the adjudicative proceeding is

formal

e In any proceedings to determine whether the nonuse

application should be

approved or
rejected the state engineer shall follow the procedures and requirements of Title

63G Chapter 4 Administrative Procedures Act

After further the state engineer may reject the

i investigation approve or
application
all
4 a The state engineer shall grant a nonuse
application on or a
portion of a water
right far aperiod of tune not exceeding seven years if the applicant shows a reasonable cause

I
1
1

for nonuse

b A reasonable cause for nonuse includes

i a demonstrable financial hardship or economic depression

ii the initiation of water conservation or

efficiency practices or the operation of a

the state
groundwater recharge recovery program approved by engineer

iii operation of legal proceedings

iv the holding of a water right or stock in a mutual water company without use
by
to meet the reasonable future requirements of the public
any water supply entity
situations where in the opinion of the state the would assist in
v engineer nonuse

implementing an existing approved water management plan or

vi the loss of capacity caused by deterioration of the water

supply or delivery
if the with the specific plan to full of
equipment applicant submits application a resume use

the the
water right by replacing restoring or improving equipment
before the of a the state engineer s11a11
S a Sixty days expiration nonuse
application
notify the applicant by mail or by any fonn of electronic communication through which receipt
is verifiable ofthe date when the nonuse application will expire
b An applicant may file a
subsequent nonuse application in accordance with this

section

i
 APPENDIX D
2007 COST UPDATE
TO RIVERTON TREATMENT PLANT

t
 Date 15 Updated 07
1
2006 14
5

z En nomeerin C
P of 9
Epic
CIVIL MUNICIPAL PkOJECT MANAGEMENT WATEt KESOURCES
Page

By
1

T WORTHEN

Subject RIVERTON CITY

RO EDR TREATMENT COSTS

WELL NAME Qw N
TDS G
TDS WHERE

HILL 2400 GPM 1248 PPM 500 PPM QsloesrREAM PERMEATE FLOW

GEDGE 2400 GPM 1113 PPM 50D PPM Qw WELL FLOW

MAYNARD 880 GPM 1289 PPM 500 PPM N NORMAL WELL TDS
TDS

HAMILTON 80D GPM 1060 PPM 5D0 PPM P PERMEATE TD5

TDS

GARAMANDI 480 GPM 950 PPM 500 PPM TDS BLENDED WATER TDS GOAL

STEFFENOFF 380 GPM 1150 PPM 500 PPM

CENTRAL WTP 7340 GPM 1164 PPM 500 PPM

SYSTEM P
TD5 RECOVERY

RO 20 PPM 76

EDR 359 PPM 73

1 RO BLENDING RATIO CALCULATIONS Qw

Q51oesTREAM
WELL NAME PX
TDS REC Qw X TDS G X Qw
N TDS QSIOPSrREnM RATIO

HILL 8
1112 1795200 1613 GPM 67

GEDGE 8
977 1471200 1505 GPM 63

MAYNARD 8
1153 694320 602 GPM 68

HAMILTON 8
924 448000 484 GPM 61

8
814 216D00 z6S GPM 55
GARAMANDI
STEFFENOFF 8
1D14 247000 243 GPM 64

CENTRAL WTP 5271

1028 487X720 62174
9736 65

EDR BLENDING RATIO CALCULATIONS QSIDESTREAM QW

X REC Qw X TDS
N G X Qw
TDS QSIDESfREAM RATIO
WELL NAME R
TDS
HILL 93
850 1795200 2110 GPM a
8

GEDGE 93
715 1471200 2055 GPM 86

MAYNARD 93
891 694320 778 GPM 88

HAMILTON 93
662 000
44 676 GPM 84

GARAMANDI 93
552 216000 391 GPM 81

STEFFENOFF 93
752 247000 328 GPM a
86

CENTRAL WTP 65207

766 4871720 53837
6354 87

Updated RO EDR BUDGET PRICING May14 2007

x1s
 1 Date 15 Updated 07
1
2006 14
5

Epic Engineering PC Page 2 of 9

CIVIL MUNICIPAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT WATER RESOURCES By T WORTHEN

Subject RIVERTON CITY

RO EDR TREATMENT COSTS

81ue Original Number Inflated at 5per year ever 33 Years

1 Rom an 06 to May 07

HILL WELL Red Original Number Inflated at 10 per year over 33 Years
1 From Jan 06 to May 07

CAPITAL C05T5 RO SYSTEM EDR SYSTEM

MEMBRANES PROCESS EQUIP 227

1
D50 027
2
300

INSTALLATION COSTS 410

245 2D 279
466 a
Z3
ANTISCALANT FEED SYSTEM 700
1D6

DECARBONATION SYSTEM 700

106

ACID FEED SYSTEM 700

10E

BUILDING 531
743 3750 5F 397 7D50 SF
1
839

ENGINEERING CM @15 409

364 718
599

LEGAL ADMINISTRATION @2 588

48 962
79

TOTAL 842
2
388 677
4
798

COST PER GALLON CAPACITY 98

0 77
1

FT PRODUCED
COST PER ACRE 3D
48 76
82

BASED ON 20 YEAR LIFE

lODO GAL RO SYSTEM EDR SYSTEM

0 M C05T5 PER
5 CENTS
6 H
KW 27
0 46
D
ELECTRICITY @
CHEMICALS 04
0 DS
D

PREFILTER CARTRIDGES 04
D 03
0

MEMBRANES 08
0 YEAR LIFE
5 D7
O YEAR LIFE
15

OTHER EQUIPMENT Db
D 04
0

TOTAL 49
D 65
0

LABOR @ 35 PER HOUR 75 FIE

600 D
54 600 0
54 75 FIE

C05T PER ACRE

FT 178 231

Updated RO EDR BUDGET PRICING

May14 2007
x1s
 li Date 15 Updated D7
1
2006 14
5

J Epic Engi
neerinl
CIVIL MUNICIPAL
C
P
PROJECT MANAGEMENT WATER RESOURCES
Page

By
3

T WORTMEN
of 9

Subject RIVERTON CITY

RO EDR TREATMENT COSTS

61ue Original Number Inflated at 5per year over 33 Years

1 Rom an 06 to May 07
LEDGE WELL Red Original Number Inflated at 10 per year over 33 Years
1 From an 06 to May 07

CAPITAL COSTS RO SYSTEM EDR SYSTEM

MEMBRANES PROCESS EQUIP 227

1
050 027
2
300

INSTALLATION COSTS 410

245 20 279
466 23
ANTISCALANT FEED SYSTEM 700
106

DECARBONATION SYSTEM 7D0

106

ACID FEED SYSTEM 700

106

BUILDING 531
743 3750 SF 397 7050 SF
1
839
ENGINEERING CM @15 409
364 718
599
LEGAL ADMINISTRATION @2 588
48 962
79
TOTAL 842
2
388 677
4
798

COST PER GALLON CAPACITY 97

0 76
1

COST PER ACRE

Fl PRODUCEb 30
48 76
82

BASED ON 20 YEAR LIFE

O M CDSTS PER 100D GAL Rp SYSTEM EDR SYSTEM

ELECTRICITY @ 6
5 CENTS H
KW 27
0 46
0

CHEMICALS 04
0 05
0

PREFILTER CARTRIDGES 04
0 03
0

MEMBRANES 08
0 YEAR LIFE
5 07
0 YEAR LIFE
15
OTHER EQUIPMENT 06
0 04
0

TOTAL 49
0 65
0

i LABOR @ 35 PER HOUR 600 0

54 75 FIE 600 0
54 75 FIE

C05T PER ACRE

FT 178 231

May14 2007
Updated RO EDR BUDGET PRICING x1s
 Vi Date 15 Updated 07
1
2006 14
5

J
c En
EUi ineerin P
C Page 4 0 9

CIVIL MUNICIPAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT WA7kR RESOURCES By T WORTHEN

t
Subject RIVERTON CITY

RO EDR TREATMENT COSTS

Blue Original Number Inflated at 5per year over 33 Years

1 Rom Jan 06 tp May 07

MAYNARp WELL Red Original Number Inflated at 10 per year over 33 Years
1 From an 06 to May 07

CAPITAL COSTS RO SYSTEM EDR SYSTEM

MEMBRANES PROCESS EQUIP 918

449 343
743

INSTALLATION COSTS 984 20

89 969
170 Z3
ANTISCALANT FEED SYSTEM 123
39

DECARBONATIpN SYSTEM 123

39

ACID FEED SYSTEM 123

39

BUILDING 628
272 541
512

ENGINEERING CM @15 617

133 896
219

LEGAL ADMINISTRATION @2 816

17 320
29

TOTAL 042
1
209 715
1
193

CO5T PER GALLON CAPACITI 98

0 78
1

COST PER ACRE

FT PRODUCED 30
48 76
82

BASED pN 20 YEAR LIFE

O M COSTS PER lODO GAL RO SYSTEM EDR SYSTEM

ELECTRICITY @ 6
5 CENTS H
KW 27
0 46
0

CHEMICALS 04
0 05
0

PREFILTER CARTRIDGES 04
0 03
0

MEMBRANES 08
0 YEAR LIFE
5 07
0 YEAR LIFE
15

OTHER EQUIPMENT 06
0 04
0

TOTAL 49
0 65
0

LABOR @ 35 PER HOUR 600 0

54 75 FTE 600 0
54 75 FTE

COST PER ACRE

FT 210 264

Updated RO EDR BUDGET May14 2007

PRICING x1s
 elf Date 15 Updated 07
1
2006 14
5

J
Epic Engineering C
P Page 5 of 9

CIVIE MUNICIPAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT WATER RESOURCES By T WORTHEN

Subject RIVERTON CITY

RO EDR TREATMENT COSTS

Blue Original Number Inflated at 5per year aver 33 Years

1 Rom Jan 06 to May 07

HAMILTON WELL Red Original Number Inflated at 10 per year over 33 Years
1 From Jan 06 to May 07

CAPITAL COSTS RO SYSTEM EDR SYSTEM

MEMBRANES PROCE55 EQUIP 017

409 767
675

INSTALLATION COS75 803 20

81 426
155 23

ANTISCALANT FEED 5Y5TEM 567

35

DECARBONATION 5Y5TEM 567

35

ACID FEED SY5TEM 567

35

BUILDING 844
247 946
465

ENGINEERING CM @15 470

121 906
199

LEGAL ADMINISTRATION @2 196

16 654
26

TOTAL 463
947 559
1
266

COST PER GALLON CAPACITY 96

0 75
1

COST PER ACRE

FT PRODUCED 30
48 76
82

BA5ED ON 20 YEAR LIFE

O M CO5T5 PER 1000 GAL RO SYSTEM EDR SY5TEM

S CEN7S H
KW 27
0 46
0
ELECTRICITY @ 6
CHEMICALS p4
O 05
0

PREFILTER CARTRIDGES 04
0 03
0

MEMBRANES 08
0 YEAR LIFE
5 07
0 YEAR LIFE
15

OTHER EQUIPMENT 06
D 04
0

TOTAL 49
0 65
0

LABOR @ 35 PER HOUR 600 0

54 75 FIE 600 OJ5 FIE
54

COST PER ACRE

FT 215 270

Updated RO EDR BUDGET PRICING

May14 Z007
x15
 Pate 15 Updated 07
1
2006 14
5

Epic Engineering C
P Page 6 of 9

f CIVIL MIJNIGIPAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT WATER RESOl1RCES By T WORTHEN

Subject RIVERTON CITY

RO EDR TREATMENT C05T5

Blue Original Number Inflated at 5per year over 33 Years

1 Rom Jan 06 to May 07

GARAMANDI WELL Red Original Number Infated at 10 per year over 33 Years
1 From Jan 06 to May 07

CAPITAL COSTS RO SYSTEM EDR SYSTEM

MEMBRANES PROCESS EQUIP 410

245 460
405

INSTALLATION COSTS 082 20

49 256 23
93

ANTISCALANT FEED SYSTEM 340

21

DECARBONATION SYSTEM 340

21
ACID FEED SYSTEM 340
21
BUILDING 706
148 568
279

ENGINEERING CM a
@15 882
72 944
119

LEGAL ADMINISTRATION @2 718

9 992
15
TOTAL 478
568 560
935

COST PER GALLON CAPACITY 95

0 73
1

C05T PER ACRE

FT PRODUCED 3D
48 82J6

BASED ON 20 YEAR LIFE

0 M CDSTS PER 1000 GAL RO SYSTEM EDR SYSTEM

ELECTRICITY @ 6
5 CENTS H
KW 27
0 46
0

CHEMICALS 04
0 05
0

PREFILTER CARTRIDGES 04
0 03
0

MEMBRANES 08
0 YEAR LIFE
5 07
0 YEAR LIFE
15
OTHER EQUIPMENT 06
0 04
0

TOTAL 49
0 65
0
i

LABOR @ 35 PER HOUR 600 0

54 75 FIE 600 0
54 75 FIE

COST PER ACRE

FT 252 308

Updated RO EDR BUDGET May14 2007

PRICING x15
 i Date 15 Updated 07
1
2006 14
5

Epie EnQri
neerin C
P Page 7 of 9

CIVIL MUNICIPAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT WATER RESOURCES By T WORTH EN

Subject RIVERTON CITY

RO EDR TREATMENT COSTS

Blue Original Number InFlated at 5per year over 33 Years

1 Rom Jan 06 to May 07

STEFFENOFF WELL Red Original Number InFlated at 10 per year over 1

3 3 Years From an 06 to May 07

CAPITAL COSTS RO SYSTEM EDR SYSTEM

MEMBRANES PROCESS EQUIP 283

194 989
0
37
INSTALLATION C05T5 857 20
38 828 23
73

ANTISCALAN7 FEED SYSTEM 894

16

DECARBONATION SYSTEM 894

16

ACID FEED SYSTEM 894

16

BUILDING 7x6
117 324
221

ENGINEERING CM @15 698

57 955
94

LEGAL ADMINISTRATION @2 693

7 661
12

TOTAL 045
450 651
74Q

COST PER GALLON CAPACITI 97

0 76
1

COST PER FT PRODUCED

ACRE 30
48 76
82

BASED ON 20 YEAR LIFE

0 M CO5T5 PER 1000 GAL RO 5Y5TEM EDR SYSTEM

ELECTRICITY @ 6
5 CENTS H
KW 27
0 46
0

CHEMICALS 04
0 05
0

PREFILTER CARTRIDGES 04
0 03
0

MEMBRANES 08
0 YEAR LIFE
5 07
0 YEAR LIFE
15 i

OTHER EQUIPMENT 06
0 04
0

TOTAL 49
0 65
0

LA80R CaT 35 PER HOUR 600 0

54 75 FTE 600 0
54 75 FTE

COST PER ACRE

FT 277 334

Updated RO EDR BUDGET May14 2007

PRICING x1s
r

ji Date 15 Updated 07
1
2006 14
5

sy E is En neerin C
P Page 8 of 9

CIVIL MUNICIPAL PF7gJGC7 MANAGEMENT WATER RESOURCES By T WORTHEN

Subject RIVERTON CI
Tl

RO EDR TREATMENT COSTS

Blue Original Number Inflated at 5per year over 33 Years

1 Rom Jan 06 to May 07

CENTRAL WTP Red Original Number Inflated at o

10 per year aver 33 Years
1 From an 06 to May 07

CAPITAL COSTS RO SYSTEM EDR SYSTEM

MEMBRANES PROCE55 EQUIP 752

3
728 200
6
159

INSTALLATION COSTS 546

750 20 426 23
1
037

ANTISCALANT FEED SYSTEM 324

326

DECARBONATION SYSTEM 324

326

ACID FEED SYSTEM 324

326

BUILDING 181 11000 SF

2
025 965 20D00 SF
3
50D

ENGINEERING CM @15 100

1
542 787
1
703

LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 2 739

146 360
238

TOTAL 584
8
228 D83
944
13

COST PER GALLON CAPACITY 96

0 72
1

FT PRODUCED
C057 PER ACRE 48 81

BASED ON 2D YEAR LIFE

RD SYSTEM EDR SYSTEM

O M COSTS PER 1000 GAL
5CENTS
6 H
KW 27
0 46
0
ELECTRICITY @
04
0 DS
O
CHEMICALS
PREFILTER D4
O 03
0
CARTRIDGES
MEMBRANES DB
O YEAR LIFE
5 07
0 YEAR LIFE
15

OTHER EQUIPMENT 06
0 04
0

TOTAL 49
0 65
0

LABOR C 35 PER HOUR 400

218 3 FTE 400
218 3 FTE

C05T PER ACRE

FT 184 237

Updated RO EDR BUDGET May14 2007

PRICING x1s

1
 tiji Date 15 Updated 07
1
2006 14
5

Epic En neerin C
P Page 9 of 9

CIVIL MUNICIPAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT WATER RESOURCES By T WORTHEN

Subject RIVERTON CITY

RO EDR TREATMENT CO5T5

SUMMARY

CAPITAL M
O CAPITAL M
O

WELL NAME RO GAL CAPACITY RO FT

ACRE EDR GAL CAPACITY EDR FT
ACRE

HILL 98
0 178 77
1 231

GEDGE 97
D 178 76
1 231

MAYNARD 9
0 21D 78
1 264

HAMILTON 96
D 215 75
1 270

GARAMANDI 95
0 252 73
1 3D8

STEFFENOFF 97
0 277 76
1 334

CENTRAL WTP 96
0 183 72
1 Z37

WELL NAME RO FT
ACRE EDR FT
ACRE

HILL 226 314

GEDGE 226 314

MAYNARD 259 347

HAMILTON 264 352

GARAMANDI 301 391

STEFFENOFF 325 417

CENTRAL WTP 237 318

t Updated RO EDR BUDGET May14

PRICING x1s
2007