Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Victor is not merely constructing a being of proportionate measures, but something above and beyond maleness he creates a super man a being eight foot in height, and proportionably large. Again and again we can see the issue of male arrogance/responsibility/accountability playing a key role in Frankenstein. For doesnt Victors dogged arrogance kill the innocent? One can in this way construct a feminist view where important parallels can be made between the fictional character of Victor Frankenstein and the lover and husband of the author Mary Shelley. For in the same way that innocence is murdered and indeed so are all the female characters in the story, by the monster created by Victor Frankensteins immovable beliefs, so is Mary Shelleys innocence lost in the realms of Percy Shelley; his genius, his arrogance, his beliefs, his insensitivity, his circle of ;friends, his absences and of course his love It is a general truth that from the moment one mind is penetrated by the influence of another, its own native power over other minds has gone, and for ever. And Mary parted with the power at sixteen, before she knew she was to have it. (Mrs Julian Marshall 1889 Life and Letters of Mary Shelley This is not to say that Mary Shelley was an naive captive to Percy, she was an intelligent willing disciple, but she was also a sixteen-year-old girl who fell deeply in love; a love that .was frowned upon by friends and indeed Marys own father William Godwin Indeed Frankenstein is full of feminist issues that have particular reference to Mary Shelleys life, for instance when we look at the treatment of the female characters in the book we can only wonder at what Shelley was trying to convey, there are three main female characters in Frankenstein, the Mother, Elizabeth and Justine, all three characters are killed off by Mary Shelley; the Mother dies (as did Marys own Mother) and both Elizabeth and Justine are killed by the monster. In Shelleys description of the two women, her treatment is reminiscent ;of Mary Wollstonecrafts writings on what quite definitely a women should not be She was docile and goodI loved to tend on her, as I should on a favourite animalShe was continually endeavouring to contribute to the happiness of others, entirely forgetful of herself Elizabeths character is submissive and subjugated, she has nothing else other than Victor and his family, she is not educated in the same way that Victor is, or even Clervill who learns languages, Elizabeth remains at home while Victor pursues his education, and is expected to wait for him in reserved obedience. We can see the shadows of autobiography slipping into the text, as it was a bitter pill that Mary Shelleys two brothers and indeed her sister Jane Clairmont were educated at boarding schools whereas Marys education was minimal and I feel, a little forgotten by her emotionally errant father William Godwin. Jane might be well
educatedbut Mary could stay at home and mend the Stockings. Justine is also given the same kind of description, she is spoken of as being the most grateful little creature in the world Is Shelley mocking this type of woman? Is she mocking herself? Is she promoting emancipation from the bonds of the waiting female is she saying that if one does not free oneself emotional death is the outcome? For indeed we know that her mother Mary ;Wollstonecraft did not agree with belief of the docile creature as the vision of womanhood when he tells us that women are formed for softness and sweet attractive grace, I cannot comprehend this meaning, unlesshe meant to deprive us of souls, and insinuate we were beings only designed by sweet attractive grace, and docile blind obedienceHow grossly do !they insult us who thus advise us only to render ourselves gentle, domestic brutes So then to the question as to the reason why Mary Shelley wrote these two female characters into the novel, is she making a feminist comment about a certain type of female and this is why she sacrifices them to Frankenstein/the creature? Is she making a valid comment about the death of femininity through a dominating male presence? For no-where in the book is there a strong female character, Elizabeths strengths are only seen in her capacity to assist others mainly Frankenstein and his family. Is this book a testament to male domination and ?the slaughter of innocents at the hands of male arrogance For are not all of the innocents murdered, even the Monsters innocence is sacrificed at the hands of Victor Frankensteins lack of care for the being he has created, Victor just isnt there for the creature, much in the same way that perhaps William Godwin and indeed Percy .Shelleys absences and insensitivity had an effect on the young Mary Shelley It seemed sometimes that he had an extraordinary and fatal capacity for wrecking the lives and happiness of his family by pandering to some mad impulse which .he, and only he, decided was the right course to pursue This quote is very reminiscent of Victor Frankenstein and his insatiable appetite for acquiring the secret of life at all costs and in the end his vision costs him all of his loved ones and indeed his own life. This previous quote is in reference to Percy Shelleys behaviour concerning the transporting of his ill daughter Clara across Italy, Clara was already ill, and Shelleys insistence on travel proved to be the fatal blow for his daughter, Clara died on the 24th of September 1818 in the same year that Frankenstein was published. We do not know if Mary blamed him for the death of Clara, but one cannot help to see the same selfish parallels .in Victor Frankenstein and Percy Shelley Since 1814 Mary Godwin/Shelley had been in the hands of Percy Shelley and his vision of free love, a new human race enlightened by knowledge and the rejection of God, he dreamed of living in a free community, free from the bondage of marriage, his views were seen as radical and monstrous by some but it was his vision gleaned from the literary life that he ;immersed himself in His literary life consisted of ransacking booksto find hints and suggestions that pointed towards the nature of supposed realityThese fragments were then used in conjunction with his own imagination to aide him in the representation of an unknown future. Mary was soon to describe Victor Frankenstein constructing his creature in a similar way, stitching it .together from bits and pieces, from stray fragments So Mary Shelley lived with Percys vision, she shared her marriage with other women and indeed other men, Shelley encouraged Mary to engage in sexual partnership with Thomas Jefferson Hogg; which Mary only then seemed to do because of the lack of emotional support from her husband and his fascination with Claire Clairmont. Mary trekked across Europe, followed Shelley blindly, lived in poverty and estrangement from her father who she loved
again somewhat blindly. Mary Shelleys story is of female sacrifice, Percy Shelleys story is that of selfishness and arrogance, he is the proverbial spoilt child, he forever was getting his .own way Mary Shelleys fictional writing of Frankenstein seems to be steeped in autobiography; this makes her life all-important in a feminist reading of her work. If we look at the concept of Frankenstein and his creature being one and the same and both being a metaphor for male dominance we can consider that femininity is the main victim of arrogance in the pursuit of .a vision