Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A
I
W
A
N
Taiwan Watch
Vol.13, No.2
W
A
T
C
H
2011
2
0
1
1
Taiwan Watch
website: http://www.taiwanwatch.org.tw
2011132
Taiwan Watch
02
03
04
52
62
17
19
06
38
42
William Freudenburg
Robert GramlingDebra
Davidson
41
49
50
Peter Bosshard
Contents
32%
2-3%
6
312
55The overall
situation in Fukushima remains very serious
25
1953
20113119
1979328
1982
1985
1990
1986426
3025
30
(IAEA)
34IAEA
31
;
CO2
BBS
Pripyat River300
3
28
1530
25
Sarcophagus
4
1979
Susquehanna
RiverHarrisburg169
1978
30
1977
80
15
7
15
50
20
10
5-6
20-30
100-200
3-1015,000
11
1957
1957
1999150
1950
3
11130
9.0
32
ECCS
12
23
312314
315315
3/29
320
13
2020-30
7
3,355
10
WTO
250
4010-100
0.2
20-3013
Taiwan Watch Vol.13, No.2 / Summer, 2011
14
25
9
10
1.
40
15,000
45,00025,000
16
15
20
40
10010
20
150
717
20
50
40
50
324
20
18
2.
WHO
50,000
19
414040
40
49
15,000
Taiwan Watch Vol.13, No.2 / Summer, 2011
11
20
21
3.
3a.
12
36
22
nightmare
32
23
24
3b.
12
27
25
20-30
10
4242
42
20
2,0004,000 28
26
4.
CNN
13
200
200
14
29
20
750
2,000
370 31
30
250
50
20-30
32
25
1. 52011318
33
2.
http://www.taiwanwatch.org.tw/
issue/nuclear/SAVE/save026.htm
3.
2
4. Frequently Asked Chernobyl Questions, IAEA (
)
5. Safety case study: the Three Mile Island accident,
Nuclear Installation Safety Net
7.
9.
10.
11.
Google
30
12.20110311
80
15
13. MIT
http://www.techbang.com.tw/posts/5204fukushima-nuclear-power-plant-exploded-mitscholars-how-to-say-bNuclear Energy Crisis in
Japan, the New York Times, March 28, 2011
12
14.
2011320
2011330
Nownews WTO
2011328Greenpeace radiation team
pinpoints need to extend Fukushima evacuation zone,
Greenpeace, March 27, 2011; Japan upgrades nuclear
safety standards after plant disaster, Reuters, March
30, 2011
15. 2520113
24
2011328
16.-Q
A
16
22. 2319
23. No Nukes: How Three Mile Island was Disaster
for Media Credibility, Business & Media Institute,
March 22, 2011Three Mile Island, Pannsylvania
Highways
24.8.9chensumi
http://blog.roodo.com/chensumi/archives/15334149.
htmltorrent
http://blog.roodo.com/torrent/archives/15369273.
html
314
320
324
TVBS
25. 6 12
328
26.
315Nownews
314Nownews
3
14
322
/
325
27.316
28. 2427
29.328
328
http://
blog.roodo.com/elysii/archives/15507085.html
30.
31.3430
46
411
411
32. http://www.feitsui.gov.
tw
41
33.321
426
25
(Stochastic)(Non-Stochastic)
()()
(Sievert)
1(Sv)=1,000
(mSv)=1,000,000(Sv)
/mSv/yr/mSv/h
2
100/
100/ 1,2
1,000
5%201,000
1
?
()
Taiwan Watch Vol.13, No.2 / Summer, 2011
17
(mSv)
50-100
500
550
700
750
900
1,000
4,000
10,000
20,000
23
12
18
2.4 mSv/yr
50 mSv/yr
250 mSv/yr
350 mSv/lifetime
400 mSv/h
1,000 mSv/h
(<1
mSv/yr)7.9mSv
)
(100 mSv/yr)
6-16 Sv
23721
2 mSv/yr
everystockphoto
Sovacool19072007
166
1.
Sovacool, BJ. 2008. The costs of failure: A preliminary assessment
of major energy accidents, 19072007, Energy Policy 3618021820
Taiwan Watch Vol.13, No.2 / Summer, 2011
19
1G
80
7011
20
1.02G
Diablo Canyon
0.76G
2008
AN ASSESSMENT
PLANTSPG&E
0.3G
PG&E
0.4G0.6G
Responsibility
0.6G
Maplecroft
1.
0.3 G
0.4 G
0.4 G
0.4 G
: 7
: 5
: 1.5
: 5
70
0.6G1G
0.45 g
1.02G
PG&E
Diablo
Canyon
0.76g
1.
2. 95
21
22
DCIS
28
2010
23