UNIVERSITY OF PANGASINAN

Dagupan City
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF PROJECT PROPOSAL
FOR COMMUNITY EXTENSION SERVICES
REVISED SEPTEMBER 2008
MEETS ALL REQUIRE MEETS MEETS MEETS NONE/
MOST SOME
MENTS REQUI REQUI FEW NOT
RE RE
REQUI STATE
MENTS MENTS RE D

MENTS
A. Project Name. (5%)
Clarity in giving the project a clear profile. 5 4 3 2 0
B. Summary. (5%)
Description of the main activities of the project
and its objectives, target group and 5 4 3 2 0
cooperating partners.
C. Partnership (5%)
Clarity of the statement on the project tasks
and areas of responsibility of the implementers 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0
Involvement of partner organizations(Upang
faculty, LGUs, NGOs, GOs) in feasibility study 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0
and other planning activities
D. Community Analysis(15%)
Sufficient and current description of the
infrastructure, economic, health, educational,
socio-cultural, environmental situation of the 15 12 8 5 0
area
E. Target groups(10%)

5 4 3 2 0

5 4 3 2 0

15 12 8 5 0

10 8 6 4 0

5 4 3 2 0

3 2.5 2.0 1.5 0

3 2.5 2.0 1.5 0

3 2.5 2.0 1.5 0

3 2.5 2.0 1.5 0

 3 2.5 2.0 1.5 0

2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0

2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0

2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0

2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0

5 4 3 2 0

NSTP Section: ___________Name and Signature of Panelist:

______________________________________
Date of Evaluation: ___________________________ Over-all Rating :
______________________________