PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN BASIS BIEN DONG 1 PROJEC BD1-00-P-A-0002

0 Rev

21-Sep-10 Date

AFU Description Prep'd Check'd WP App'd BD POC App'd

Title: PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN BASIS Date Page

Document No: BD1-00-P-A-0002 : 21-SEP-10 : Page 2 of 14

PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN BASIS......................................................................2

1.0INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................................................3

2.0SCOPE....................................................................................................................................................................................5

3.0 DEFINITION...........................................................................................................................................................................6

4.0 CODES AND STANDARDS..................................................................................................................................................8

5.0METHODOLOGY..................................................................................................................................................................10

6.0DESIGN PARAMETERS AND ASSUMPTIONS..................................................................................................................12

7.0ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA AND INPUT TO OTHER DISCIPLINES....................................................................................15

8.0 STRESS ANALYSIS REPORT............................................................................................................................................17

APPENDIX A.....................................................................................................18 GENERAL LOAD CASES FOR STRESS ANALYSIS................................................18 APPENDIX B.....................................................................................................22 TYPICAL LOAD CASES FOR BLAST ANALYSIS....................................................22

1.0 1.1

INTRODUCTION Project Description The Bien Dong 1 Project is primary focused on the offshore development of the Hai Thach and Moc Tinh gas/condensate Fields in Blocks 05.2 and 05.3 in the Nam Con Son Basin approximately 340km east of eastern coast of South Vietnam together with the provision of gas and oil export facilities. The Hai Thach and Moc Tinh fields lie approximately 20km apart. The Hai Thach field is predominantly within block 05.2, but a small portion falls within block 05.3. The project is an upstream project and includes:

A Wellhead platform in Moc Tinh (WHP-MT1) A Wellhead platform in Hai Thach (WHP-HT1) A Production and Quarter Platform in Hai Thach (PQP-HT)

1.2 Acronyms and Abbreviations BD POC Bien Dong Petroleum Operating Company WHP HT1 Hai Thach Wellhead Platform PQP HT Hai Thach Production and Quarters Platform FSO Floating Storage and Offloading Vessel WHP MT1 Moc Tinh Wellhead Platform ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers API RP American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice BS British Standards MSS Manufacturers Standardization Society UKOOA United Kingdom Offshore Operators Association EEMUA Engineering Equipment & Materials Users' Association DNV Det Norske Veritas WRC Welding Research Council GRE Glass Fiber Reinforced Epoxy PSV Pressure Safety Valve

A Floating Storage and Offloading (FSO) vessel in Hai Thach An in-field pipeline from the WHP-MT1 to WHP-HT1 A condensate export line from WHP-HT1 to the FSO A gas export pipeline form WHP-HT1 to link up to the existing Nam Con Son pipeline A Subsea Composite Fiber Optic/ Power Cable from WHP-HT1 to the WHP-MT1

Title: PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN BASIS Date Page Rev kPa Kilo Pascal mPa N M MM C PTFE P& ID Mega Pascal Newton Meter Millemeter Degree Centigrade Ploytetrafluroethylene

Document No: BD1-00-P-A-0002 : 21-SEP-10 : Page 5 of 14 :0

Piping & Instrumentation Diagram

1.3 Company General Specifications

i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix.

This Specification shall be read in conjunction with the following reference Specifications. Piping Design Basis, BD-00-P-A-0001 Specification for Piping Classes, BD-00-P-S-0001 Piping Support Standard, BD-00-P-D-2102 Scope of Work for GRE Piping Systems, BD1-00-P-T-0002 Specification for Insulation for Equipment and Piping, BD-00-M-S-0333 Specification for Pressure Vessels, BD-00-M-S-0338 Structural Design Basis, BD-00-S-A-0001 Project P&ID's Project Line List

Project Critical Line List Project Datasheets SCOPE General The main objectives of the pipe stress analysis are to: Satisfy the code requirements in ASME B31.3. Confirm that the piping load on sensitive equipment do not exceed the allowable values. Identify the support locations and special support requirements such as springs, rigid struts, etc. 2.2 Load cases to be considered The stress analysis shall be carried using CAESAR II software (version 5.10) and shall comply with the requirements of the codes, standard and specifications defined in Section 4.0, and shall take into consideration the following:
x. xi. 2.0 2.1

Document No: BD1-00-P-A0002 Date : 21-SEP-10 Page : Page 6 of 14 Rev :0 Weight effects - live loads arid dead loads. Design and Operating Temperatures. Design Pressure. Temperature differential of piping, equipment and vessels. Effects of support, anchor and thermal movements. Friction effects. Wind load on exposed piping. Hydrotest. Sea Transportation (Tow / Load out case) Earthquake Blast

3.0 DEFINITION Bien Dong Petroleum Operating Company WorleyParsons, Kuala Lumpur The person, group, or organization responsible for the design, manufacture, testing, and load-out/shipping of the Equipment. The person, group, or organization responsible for the construction of platform The person, group, or organization who places purchase order on VENDOR A schedule of inspection and test activities identifying the stages at which VENDOR, COMPANY, third parties, or independent inspectors are involved and additionally identifying the involved specifications, acceptance criteria, and instructions that are relevant. The person, group, or organization who may be employed by VENDOR to provide services for the design, manufacture, testing, and load-out/shipping of the equipment, or, to provide materials, subcomponents, and sub-assemblies for incorporation in equipment Packages. VIRES (Vietnamese Register of shipping) or Independent Certifying Authority appointed by VENDOR for certifying equipment/equipment packages produced outside Vietnam and issuing certificates to VIRES. COMPANY/PURCHASER appointed person, group, or organization responsible for inspection and testing of equipment/ equipment packages at VENDOR'S shop. Indicates possible course of action. Indicates preferred course of action.

This document is the property of BD POC. Any unauthorised attempt to reproduce it, in any form, is strictly prohibited.

Indicates an intention of action.

COMPANY CONSULTANT VENDOR: CONTRACTOR PURCHASER Inspection &Test Plan (ITP) Sub-Vendor: Third Party Inspector May Shall: Will:

This document is the property of BD POC. Any unauthorised attempt to reproduce it, in any form, is strictly prohibited.

Document No: BD1-00-P-A0002 Date : 21-SEP-10 Page : Page 7 of 14 Rev :0

4.0 CODES AND STANDARDS 4.1 Applicable Codes and Standards CONTRACTOR shall consider the most recent issue of the applicable Codes and Standards listed below as part of the technical requirements for the Piping System. Recommended Practice for Design and Installation of Offshore Production Platform Piping Systems 4.1.1 API Standards Sizing, Selection and Installation of Pressure API RP 14E - Relieving Devices in Refineries, Parti of II API RP 520 Line Pipe API 5L API 610 API 617 Centrifugal Pumps for Petroleum, Petrochemical and Natural API 661 API 674 API 17D Gas Industries API 6AF Axial and Centrifugal Compressors and 4.1.2 ASME Expander-compressors for Petroleum, Standards Chemical and Gas Industry Services. ASME B16.5 ASME B31.3 Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers for General Refinery Services. ASME VIII Positive Displacement Pumps - Reciprocating Specification For Subsea Wellhead And Christmas Tree Equipment Technical Report On Capabilities of API Flanges Under Combinations of Loads Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings Process Piping Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Div I & II - Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels

4.1.3 BS Standards BS 3974

Specification for Pipe Supports

Steel Pipeline Flanges Pipe Hangers and Supports Materials, Design and Manufacture Pipe Hangers and Supports - Selection and Application

4.1.4 MSS Standards MSS-SP-44 MSS-SP-58 MSS-SP-69

Dat : 21-SEP-10 e : Page 8 of UKOOA Pag 14 e :0 Rev EEMUA 4.1.5 Other Standards Specification and Recommendation Practice for the use of GRP Piping Offshore 90/10 Copper Nickel Alloy Piping for Offshore Application Publications DNV OS-FIOI Offshore Standard-Submarine Pipeline Systems DNV-RP-D101 Structural Analysis of Piping Systems Local Stresses in Spherical and Cylindrical Shells due to External Loadings Local Stresses in Cylindrical Shells due to External Loadings Supplement to WRC Bull No.107

WRC 107 WRC 297

5.0 5.1 5.1.1 5.1.2 5.1.3 5.1.4 5.2

5.2.1

5.2.2

METHODOLOGY Line Identification Table 1 shall serve as the guidelines for the selection of the critical lines. The method of selection is to review the Project Line List and P& ID's, and categorise each line in accordance with Table 1. The lines that require comprehensive analysis shall be listed in Critical Line List. Piping within the Vendor's packaged limits shall be the responsibility of the Vendor. All skid piping shall be analysed in accordance with the criteria given in this specification. All in-skid piping external interface end termination points shall be anchored. Methods of Analysis Based on the review of all information, the category of the analysis shall be determined generally in accordance with the following guidelines. Category 1 - Exempt From Analysis All lines in category 1 shall be first reviewed for material properties and service to ensure that they are not critical. A final review of the system geometry shall be undertaken to evaluate any possible expansion, clearance, equipment interfaces, displacement, support span or support loads problems that may occur. Review of category 1 lines may not be documented. Lines that fall on category 2 or category 3 may be re-classified as category 1 when the subject lines may be readily judged by comparison with previously analysed systems. Category 2 - Simplified Analysis All lines identified in category 2 shall be verified using simplified methods; Guided Cantilever Method Lines are of uniform size and have no more than two points of fixation, no intermediate restraints, and fall within the limitation of equation (ref. Section 319.4.1, ASME B31.3);

D= pipe outside diameter [mm] y = resultant of total displacement strains [mm] to be absorbed by the piping system

Title: PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN BASIS Document No: BD1-00-P-A-0002 Date : 21-SEP-10 Page : Page 9 of 14 Rev :0 L = developed length of piping between anchors [m] U = anchor distance, straight line between anchors [m] K1=208000 SA/Ea [for SI units] SA= allowable displacement stress range per Eq. (1a), ASME B31.3, [MPa] Ea= reference modulus of elasticity at 21C, [MPa] The above methods are generally conservative and will form a quick check to ensure that the line is sufficiently flexible. As supports are generally not considered in the calculations, special attention shall be made when creating the model. Where the line is found to fail the pre-set criteria, it shall be re-classified as category 3 - subject to computer calculation. 5.2.3 Category 3 - Comprehensive Analysis (Computer Calculation) All lines in category 3 shall be analysed using CAESAR II software. Piping geometry will be modelled on the piping routing available during the analysis. Piping stress isometrics will be prepared. Where necessary, the complete piping system shall be modelled to ensure that all interactions have been taken into account. TABLE 1 - Critical Line Selection Criteria SerialLine Description Design Temp. Nominal Diameter Analysis Notes No. Range Range Category (C) 1.Connections to Rotating Equipment (mm)

upto 100 0 < 80 0 < 80 0 >2 3 3 above 100 All 80

2.Connections to Pressure Vessels, Heat Exchangers

upto 150 upto 0 < 100 0> 100 02 3 3 150 above 150 > 80

3.Connections to Reciprocating Equipment 4.Lines subject to external movements (e.g. bridge piping) 5.Pressure Relief / Blow-down systems / Vent Lines 6.Low Temperature Service

All

0 < 50 0 > 50

23

All

0 < 80 0 > 80

23

All

0 < 80 0 > 80

1 or 2 3

-29 > t > -46

0 < 80 0 > 80

1 or 2 3

t < -46

0 < 50 0 > 50

1 or 2 3

Title: PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN BASIS Date Page

Document No: BD1-00-P-A-0002 : 21-SEP-10 : Page 10 of 14

Rev 150 < t < 260 7. High Temperature Service t > 260 0< 100 0> 100 0 < 50 0 > 50

:0 2 3 23

8.

Carbon Steels, Low -29 < t < 149 Temperature Carbon Steels and Large Diameter Lines Stainless Steel / Duplex Stainless Steel / Alloy Steels t > 70

250 <0 <400 0 > 400 0< 150 0> 150

23

9.

1 or 2 3

Notes:
1. 2. 3. 4.

6.1.1 6.1.2 6.1.3 a) b) c)

6.2.1 6.2.2 6.2.3

The above table is applicable to metallic piping systems only. Stress analysis of all GRE lines shall be analysed by the Vendor. Transportation loads shall be considered. All pipe supports provided for transportation shall be removed after installation of the platform. Blast analysis of GRE lines in Fire Water (WF) service shall be analysed by the Vendor in accordance with section 6.10 of this document. 6.0 DESIGN PARAMETERS AND ASSUMPTIONS 6.1 Temperature Ambient installation temperature shall be considered as 32.4C (max.) and 16C (min.). System design temperature and pressure, as stated in the Project Line List, shall be used for the stress analysis. During analysis the following exceptions in using alternate temperatures, other than the design temperatures, may be made: Lines directly exposed to solar radiation shall be evaluated at a temperature not lower than 60C. Nozzle loads of pumps and other rotating equipments shall be evaluated at operating temperature. Other cases in which the system design temperature is not considered for the analysis shall be documented with necessary justification. 6.2 Miscellaneous design factors Stress range reduction factor for cyclic condition shall be considered as unity, unless otherwise indicated. Insulation thickness shall be as per the Project Line List / Project Insulation Specification and densities shall be in accordance with project specifications. Multiple-case runs, considering variations in operating conditions for equipment and systems shall

Document No: BD1-00-P-A-0002 Date : 21-SEP-10 Page : Page 11 of 14 Rev :0 be performed as necessary. 6.2.4 Cold springing shall not be used for stress analysis. 6.3 Wind Loads Wind loading should be considered on a case-by-case basis. In determining the need for analysis it should be noted that: 10" NB lines and smaller, which are guided in accordance with good practice, generally do not need specific analysis. In well-shielded areas wind loads may become insignificant. When wind load is to be considered a shape factor of 0.65 and wind speed is to be applied in two separate directions only (+/- X and +/- Z direction). Wind loading/speed at 10m above mean sea level to be considered is, 27.5 m/s (1 hr average), 37.9 m/s (3 sec gust).. 6.4 Seismic Loads (Static Equivalent) Earthquake loads (acceleartions in "g") to be used is: 0.15 g (horizontal) in combination with 0.25g vertical. 6.5 Wellhead Growth For wellhead flow lines, the thermal growth and conductor clearances, the following displacements at the Xmas tree shall be used. Vertical = +300 mm to -100 mm Horizontal = +/- 25mm 6.6 Transient Loads Any form of transient load shall be catered for. Lines subject to mixed phase flow shall have additional guides, stops or anchors for piping control 6.7 Sea Transportation Loads Sea transportation loads (accelerations in "g") to be used is Vertical Acceleration: 0.50 g (in addition to gravity) Horizontal Acceleration: 0. 60 g (in any direction) Nozzle loads shall not be evaluated in this condition. 6.8 Differential Displacement For pipes that cross from one platform to another via bridge, platform displacement will be considered. Platform displacement values shall be in accordance with HT Sub-Structure Inplace Analysis Report, Title: PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN BASIS Document No: BD1-00-P-A-0002 Date : 21-SEP-10 Page : Page 12 of 14 Rev :0 WHP-HT1-S-R-0101 and PQP HT Sub-Structure Inplace Analysis Report, PQP-HT-S-R-0101. 6.9 PSV Reaction Forces due to PSV discharge shall be calculated as per API RP 520 if PSV manufacturer data is not available. 6.10 Blast Design Critical Piping shall be analysed for Blast loads per below table: PQP-HT Platform Category 3 lines in the following services: a. GF(Fuel Gas) b. PG (Hydrocarbon Gas) c. PL (Process Hydrocarbon Liquid) d. VH (Pressure Vent High) e. WF (Fire Water) - GRE lines only

Table-2: SI. No.PQP-HT Platform 1Sub Cellar Deck Piping 2Cellar Deck Piping 3Mezzanine Deck Piping 4Mezzanine Deck - Flare Boom Piping 5Main Deck Piping Dynamic Drag Pressure 0.04 barg. 0.04 barg. 0.28 barg. 0.08 barg. 0.04 barg.

There is no blast analysis requirement for WHP-HT1 Platform and WHP-MT1 Platform. The Dynamic Drag Pressure shall be applied on the piping as a wind load. Wind shape factor of 1.0 shall be used for blast calculations. Blast loads shall be applied to the piping in the X, Y and Z co-ordinates, in positive and negative directions. Typical load cases to be considered for blast calculations are included as Appendix B. Blast analysis shall be performed at operating parameters (ie. operating temperature and pressure). For allowable stress, 1.8xSh (Sh: allowable stresses at temperature) shall be used. Flange leakage shall be checked, this is to ensure containment of the process fluid. In addition to the flange evaluation method specified in section 7.4 of this document, for blast analysis, bolt allowable multiplier of 1.5 can be used. Piping imposed external forces and moments on Equipment nozzles (pressure vessels, pumps, heat exchanger and skid termination flanges) not to be verified. Restraint loads during blast shall be clearly indicated in the stress isometric.

Dat e Pag e Rev

7.0 7.1

21-SEP-10 Page 13 of 14 0

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA AND INPUT TO OTHER DISCIPLINES Load Cases Stress analysis shall be performed for different load cases as applicable. A list of general load cases to be considered is included as Appendix A 7.2 Piping Stresses All piping stresses shall be within ASME B31.3 code allowable. 7.3 Nozzle Loads 7.3.1 General Allowable nozzle loads on equipment shall fall within the limit specified below based on the worst operating conditions. 7.3.2 Pressure Vessels and Heat Exchangers: Allowable nozzle forces and moments for pressure vessels shall be Specification for Pressure Vessels, BD-00-M-S-0338 Attachment 1. Wherever loads exceed these allowable loads during detail design, vendor shall be contacted to confirm the design of equipment for applicable nozzle loads Pressure vessel nozzles shall be modelled in CAESAR II for thermal growth. Should there be difficulty in meeting the allowable nozzle loads, the nozzle stiffness as calculated/considered by CAESAR II shall be used. 7.3.3 Centrifugal pumps: Centrifugal pump nozzle loads in the operating condition shall not exceed two (2) times API 610 allowable. For technical and for a safe long term operation, the nozzle loads shall not exceed two (2) times API 610 allowable. In case the nozzle loads exceed two times API 610 allowable during working condition, a Technical Query shall be issued for this. 7.3.4 Turbine and Centrifugal Compressor Piping Nozzle displacements for turbine and compressor nozzles shall be obtained from the supplier. Maximum piping load in the operating condition for turbine and compressor nozzles shall be 5.55 times the values obtained from NEMA SM-23 or 3 times the values obtained from API 617. 7.3.5 Air Cooler Piping For piping loads at air-coolers the maximum piping load on the air cooler nozzles shall not exceed three (3) times API 661 allowable. 7.3.6 Other Equipment: Allowable nozzle loads of other equipment not specifically mentioned shall be in accordance with

Title: PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN BASIS

Dat : 21-SEP-10 : e Page 14 of Pag 14 e :0 Rev the respective Vendor and/or the governing equipment design code(s). 7.4 Flange Leakage Evaluation. Flange leakage under pipe loads is evaluated by converting piping loads to an "equivalent pressure". This value is then added to the actual system design pressure, the sum of which is then compared with the ASME B16.5 allowable pressure at corresponding load case temperature multiplied by 1.5. If a flange load exceeds the preceding value above, a flange analysis shall be performed according to the requirements of section VIII, Div.l of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Flange leakage shall be evaluated at the corresponding load case temperature. 7.5 Support Loads 7.5.1 Any piping loads in excess of 5KN acting horizontally and 10KN acting vertically will be provided to the structural department for structural integrity checks. 7.5.2 Spring Hanger Supports The use of spring hangers will be minimized in the design of the piping. Spring hanger selection tables shall be extracted from the computer printouts. These types of supports shall conform to BS 3974 or MSS-SP-58 and MSS-SP-69. 7.6 Friction The frictional forces at the pipe supports have a significant effect on the behavior of the piping system. The additional loads due to friction at supports, restraints and equipment nozzles shall be considered. The various frictional factors to be used in the analysis are; 0.10 for PTFE to Stainless Steel / Carbon Steel support 0.20 for Stainless Steel to Stainless Steel support 0.30 for Carbon Steel to Carbon Steel support 7.7 Pipe Spans Pipe spans shall be in line with the Pipe Support Standard, Doc. No. BD-00-P-D-2102. 8.0 STRESS ANALYSIS REPORT At the end of each formal stress analysis, each Caesar II calculation shall be stored by the stress calculation number. At the completion of piping design, pipe stress engineer shall prepare stress reports for all the critical lines. The reports shall include the following: Copy of approved stress sketches CAESAR II graphic plots CAESAR II electronic native input and output files. All electronic files shall be contained in Compact Disc (CD).

This document is the property of BD POC. Any unauthorised attempt to reproduce it, in any form, is strictly prohibited.

Title: PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN BASIS

Document No: BD1-00-P-A-0002

Document No: BD1-00-P-A-0002 Date Page Rev APPENDIX A GENERAL LOAD CASES FOR STRESS ANALYSIS Title: PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN BASIS Date Page Rev

: 21-SEP-10 : Page 1 of 4 :0 Document No: BD1-00-P-A-0002 : 21-SEP-10 : Page 2 of 4 :0

This document is the property of BD POC. Any unauthorised attempt to reproduce it, in any form, is strictly prohibited.

TYPICAL GENERAL LOAD CASES FOR STRESS ANALYSIS Load CaseDescription Case Type Combination MethodRemarks 1WW+ HP 2W+ P1 + T1 + (D1) 3W+ P1 +T2 + (D2) 4W+ P1 + T3 + (D3) 5W+ P1 6W+ P1 + T1 + D1 + WIN1 7W+ P1 + T1 + D1 + WIN2 8W+ P1 +T1 + D1 + WIN3 9W+ P1 +T1 + D1 + WIN4 10W+ P1 + T1 + D1 + U1 11W+ P1 + T1 + D1 + U2 12W+ P1 +T1 + D1 + U3 13W+ P1 + T1 + D1 - U1 14W+ P1 + T1 + D1 - U2 15W+ P1 +T1 + D1 -U3 16L6- L2 17L7- L2 18L8- L2 19L9- L2 20L10- L2 21L11 - L2 22L12-L2 23L13-L2 24L14-L2 25L15- L2 26L5 + L16 27L5 + L17 28L5 + L18 29L5 + L19 30L5 + L20 31L5 + L21 32L5 + L22 33L5 + L23 34L5 + L24 35L5 + L25 36L2- L5 37L3- L5 38L4- L5 39L37-L38 Title: PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN BASIS Date Page Rev HydroOPEOPEOPESUSOPEOPEOPEOPEOPEOPEOPEOPEOPEOPEOCC OCC OCC OCC OCC OCC OCC OCC OCC OCC OCC OCC OCC OCC OCC OCC OCC OCC OCC OCC EXP EXP EXP EXP Hydrotest Note-1 Note-2 Note-3 Sustained OPE + Wind OPE + Wind OPE + Wind OPE + Wind OPE + Seismic OPE + Seismic OPE + Seismic OPE + Seismic OPE + Seismic OPE + Seismic AlgebraicWind Loads AlgebraicWind Loads AlgebraicWind Loads AlgebraicWind Loads AlgebraicSeismic Loads AlgebraicSeismic Loads AlgebraicSeismic Loads AlgebraicSeismic Loads AlgebraicSeismic Loads AlgebraicSeismic Loads ScalarOCC stresses ScalarOCC stresses ScalarOCC stresses ScalarOCC stresses ScalarOCC stresses ScalarOCC stresses ScalarOCC stresses ScalarOCC stresses ScalarOCC stresses ScalarOCC stresses AlgebraicExpansion AlgebraicExpansion AlgebraicExpansion AbsoluteExpansion Document No: BD1-00-P-A-0002 : 21-SEP-10 : Page 3 of 4 :0

Load CaseDescription 40T1+(D1) 41T2+(D2) 42T3+(D3) 43L2 - L40 44L3 - L41 45L4 - L42

Case Type Combination Method Remarks EXP EXP EXP SUS SUS SUS Algebraic Algebraic Algebraic Expansion Expansion Expansion Hot Sustained Hot Sustained Hot Sustained

Legend WW HP W L T1 T2 T3 P1 D1,D2, D3 WIN 1 WIN 2 WIN 3 WIN 4 U1 U2 U3 Notes

1) 2) 3) 4)

= Weight of Pipe (with Water) = Hydrotest Pressure = Weight of Pipe (with process Fluid) Load Case (for example, L6 = Load Case 6 =W+P1+T1+D1+WIN1) = Operating Temp = Design Temperature = Low Temp Case (if applicable) = Design Pressure = Initial Displacement @ T1, T2, T3 (if applicable) = Wind in (+) X - direction = Wind in (-) X - direction = Wind in (+)Z - direction = Wind in (-) Z - direction = Seismic Acceleration in "X" direction = Seismic Acceleration in "Y" direction = Seismic Acceleration in "Z" direction

To be used for spring design / rotating equipment nozzle loads To be used for static equipment nozzle loads / stress calculation. To be used for low temp cases eg. Blow down / relief systems. The Cartesian axis system used in the analysis shall be as follows: "-X" represents North direction. "Y" represents vertical axis. "-Z" represents East direction.

PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN BASIS..................................................................2

1.0INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................................................3

2.0SCOPE.............................................................................................................................................................................5

3.0 DEFINITION....................................................................................................................................................................6

4.0 CODES AND STANDARDS...........................................................................................................................................8

5.0METHODOLOGY...........................................................................................................................................................10

6.0DESIGN PARAMETERS AND ASSUMPTIONS...........................................................................................................12

7.0ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA AND INPUT TO OTHER DISCIPLINES.............................................................................15

8.0 STRESS ANALYSIS REPORT.....................................................................................................................................17

APPENDIX A....................................................................................................18 GENERAL LOAD CASES FOR STRESS ANALYSIS...............................................18 APPENDIX B....................................................................................................22 TYPICAL LOAD CASES FOR BLAST ANALYSIS...................................................22
Speed m / Sec. Pipe size nominal diameter in mm Marking of Support Loads on Stress Sketches: Support loads shall be marked as follows: 1. Highest of all the Loadcases (Including Hydro, Earthquake & Wind).

Title: PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN BASIS

Document No: BD1-00-P-A-0002

APPENDIX B TYPICAL LOAD CASES FOR BLAST ANALYSIS

Date Page Rev

21-SEP-10 Page 1 of 3 0

This document is the property of BD POC. Any unauthorised attempt to reproduce it, in any form, is strictly prohibited.

Title: PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN BASIS Document No: BD1-00-P-A-0002 Date : 21-SEP-10 Page : Page 2 of 3 Rev :0 TYPICAL LOAD CASES FOR BLAST ANALYSIS BLAST IN POSITIVE DIRECTION Load CaseDescription Case Type CombinationRemarks Method 1W+T1+P1 OPEOPE 2W+ P1 + T1 + WIN1 OPEFor Support loading and Flange Leakage 3W+ P1 + T1 + WIN2 OPEFor Support loading and Flange Leakage 4W + P 1 + T 1 + WIN3 OPEFor Support loading and Flange Leakage 5W+ P1 SUS6L 2 - L 1 SUS Algebraic 7L 3 - L 1 SUS Algebraic 8L 4 - L 1 SUS Algebraic 9L5 + L6 SUS ScalarStress Check 10L5 + L7 SUS ScalarStress Check 11L5 + L8 SUS ScalarStress Check 12L1 - L5 EXP AlgebraicExpansion

W L T1 P1 WIN 1 WIN 2 WIN 3

= = = = = = =

Legend Weight of Pipe (with process Fluid) Load Case (for example, L1 = Load Case 1 =W+P1+T1) Operating Temperature Operating Pressure Dynamic Drag Pressure in (+) X - direction Dynamic Drag Pressure in (+) Y - direction Dynamic Drag Pressure in (+) Z - direction

Load CaseDescription 1W+T1+P1 2W + P 1 + T 1 + WIN1 3W+ P1 + T1 + WIN2 4W+ P1 + T1 + WIN3 5W+ P1 6L 2 - L 1 7L 3 - L 1 8L 4 - L 1 9L5 + L6 10L5 + L7 11L5 + L8 12L1 - L5

BLAST IN NEGATIVE DIRECTION Case Type CombinationRemarks Method OPEOPE OPEFor Support loading and Flange Leakage OPEFor Support loading and Flange Leakage OPEFor Support loading and Flange Leakage SUSSUS Algebraic SUS Algebraic SUS Algebraic SUS ScalarStress Check SUS ScalarStress Check SUS ScalarStress Check EXP AlgebraicExpansion

Document No: BD1-00-P-A-0002 Date : 21-SEP-10 Page : Page 3 of 3 Rev :0 Legend W = Weight of Pipe (with process Fluid) L = Load Case (for example, L1 = Load Case 1 =W+P1+T1) T1 = Operating Temperature P1 = Operating Pressure WIN 1 = Dynamic Drag Pressure in (-) X - direction WIN 2 = Dynamic Drag Pressure in (-) Y - direction WIN 3 = Dynamic Drag Pressure in (-) Z - direction Notes 1) The Cartesian axis system used in the analysis shall be as follows: "-X" represents North direction. "Y" represents vertical axis. "-Z" represents East direction.

PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS DESIGN BASIS......................................................................2

1.0INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................................................3

2.0SCOPE..............................................................................................................................................................................................5

3.0 DEFINITION......................................................................................................................................................................................6

4.0 CODES AND STANDARDS.............................................................................................................................................................8

5.0METHODOLOGY............................................................................................................................................................................10

6.0DESIGN PARAMETERS AND ASSUMPTIONS.............................................................................................................................12

7.0ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA AND INPUT TO OTHER DISCIPLINES..............................................................................................15

8.0 STRESS ANALYSIS REPORT......................................................................................................................................................17

APPENDIX A.....................................................................................................18 GENERAL LOAD CASES FOR STRESS ANALYSIS................................................18 APPENDIX B.....................................................................................................22 TYPICAL LOAD CASES FOR BLAST ANALYSIS....................................................22
Speed m / Sec. Pipe size nominal diameter in mm Marking of Support Loads on Stress Sketches: Support loads shall be marked as follows: 1. Maximum load of the positive and negative blast cases shall be marked.