You are on page 1of 2

Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region _____ Division of ______

CLASSROOM OBSERVATION CHECKLIST S. Y._______________


Tttttt TEACHER : GRADE & POSITION:

FOR _____1ST ____ _2ND SEMESTER


SUBJECT AREA OBSERVED: DATE:

I.

CLASSROOM PREPARATION/MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR


1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Classroom was structured to enhance learning (display boards, Seating arrangement, lights, ventilation, etc. All necessary visual aids/instructional materials were prepared ahead of time. Boardwork was prepared before class started. Teacher was flexible in his/her time management. Maintained orderand discipline in the classroom. Sub Rating (Total Score 5) x 20% Example (505) x 20= 20 = 10 x .20 = 2 TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS PERFORMANCE INDICATOR O 10 Average VS S US 8 6 4 Poor 2

O 10

Average VS S US Poor 8 6 4 2

II.

TEACHER 1. Clearly formulated the objectives of the lesson 2. Attained the objectives of the lesson. 3. Showed proficiency in the required language of instruction 4. Presented the lesson in a way which captured the interest of the learner 5. Used real life situations, concrete objects, print & non-print materials in the Presentation/development of the lesson. 6. Considered intervening of task/skills/process and content. 7. Provided meaningful connections between & among learning opportunities prior knowledge, relevant events & the learners lives and experiences. 8. Emplyed utilized integrative strategies. Integration of values in the subject taught Integration of Science & Health in concept in English as content integration of SK/HKS concepts in Filipino content Integration EPP, HKS and MSEP Integrationalon across learning areas 9. Provided varied activities to encourage participation of every one especially the slow learners. 10. Provided activities for interactive/group work/cooperative learning. 11. Acted as facilitator during class discussion. 12. Provided varied learning activities congruent to the objectives of the lesson 13. Recognized pupils individual differences and provided activities for: ---- remediation ---- reinforcement ---- enrichment 14. Asked questions that developed critical thinking skills, higher order thinking skills (HOTS) e. g. open ended questions 15. Gave homework as a follow-up of the lesson. Used textbooks/materials clearly appropriately to get ideas across Used instructional materials creatively to get ideas across. 16. Showed mastery of the subject matter

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

Average

O 10 THE PUPILS 17. Were actively engaged throughout the lesson 18. Asked/answered questions reflecting Higher Order of Thinking Skills (HOTS) 19. Were generally motivated to learn more. 20. Were provided opportunities for free expression of ideas. Sub-rating: (Total Score 20) x 50% =(200 20) x 50 = 10 x .50 = 5

VS 8

S 6

US 4

Poor 2

III.

ASSESSMENT OF PUPILS
Average VS S 8 6

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR THE PUPILS 1. Learning was evaluated through seatwork exercise/paper and pencil tests. 2. Learning was evaluated through portfolio assessment. 3. Learners other heeds were diagnosed after the lesson. 4. The lesson was assessed to determine if the objective were attained within the allotted time.

O 10

US 4

Poor 2

TOTAL SCORE
Sub rating: (Total Score 4) x 20% =(40 4) x 20 = 2 =10 x .20 = 2

IV.

CLASSROOM INTERACTION
RATE THE TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS AS A WHOLE IN TERMS OF INTERACTION

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 1. 2. 3. Teacher pupil Interaction Pupil pupil Interaction Pupil Materials Interaction TOTAL SCORE Sub-rating: (Total Score 3) x 10% =(30 3) x 10 =10 x .10 = 1

O 10

Average VS S 8 6

US 4

Poor 2

V.

OTHER COMMENTS ON THE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION _______________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY OF RATING I. II. III. IV. Classroom Preparation Management Teaching Learning Process Assessment of Pupils Classroom Interaction OVERALL RATING WEIGHT 2 5 2 1 10 SUB RATING

KEY TO DESCRIPTIVE RATING (OVERALL) 8.60 10.00 = Outstanding 6.00 - 8.60 = Very Satisfactory 4.60 - 6.50 = Satisfactory 2.60 - 4.50 = Unsatisfactory 2.50 - & below= Poor CONFORME:

RATED BY: ___________________ _____ School Principal I

_ _____________ _ (Signature Over Printed Name)

___________________ (Date)

You might also like