Babeu Complaint On Corruption in Pinal County Sheriff Office

Mark Dixon
P.O. Box 12695

Casa Grande, Az. 85130
Md20033@yahoo.com
520-705-2945

September 6, 2010

Pinal County Sheriff's Office
Paul Babeu
971 Jason Lopez Circle
Building C
Florence, AZ 85132
Paul.Babeu@pinalcountyaz.gov

RE: Mulitple complaints regarding Pinal County Sheriff Deputies and citizens

Sheriff Babeu,

In this letter and documentation I am bringing personally to your attention many crimes
and wrong doings done on behalf of members of your staff and several citizens of Pinal
County. These situations which have occurred, mainly perpetrated against myself have
until now gone unresolved. In the interest of justice and the desire to see the fair and
impartial application of justice applied these matters and facts are being brought to you,
as the Sheriff of Pinal County, to proceed forward with your duty and right the wrongs
which have occurred.

I will address these issues by each individual then with a conclusion at the end.

SGT. JOHN ELLSWORTH

Marc A. Appel, Esq has presented as evidence that Sgt. Ellsworth made the
statement that he spoke to me at some point prior to December1, 2009, please see exhibit
2 p.2 ln.3-8. I will assure you that I have never spoken to Sgt Ellsworth regarding any
issues, please see exhibit 2, p 6 ln 24-26, p7 ln1-6. If this is in fact true that Sgt John
Ellsworth has made any statement of the sort then he has committed perjury at the very
least. It should be noted that per Sgt. Ellsworth all communication were verbal no
records are available, please see exhibit 6 p. 1.

SGT. WAYNE CHASHMAN

It is my understanding that you and your office are diligent in performing a fair
and impartial investigation. In the review of Sgt. Cashmans investigation regarding my
notice of claim many inconsistencies come up, following are those inconsistencies.

- 1 -
1) How can Sgt. Cashman perform an impartial and fair investigation when he never
interviewed the list of witnesses included in the Notice of Claim I filed with Pinal
County. To make matters worse not only did he not interview the list of witnesses
but he did not interview myself, yet he interviewed Carol Dixon but failed to list
her as a witness.
2) Sgt. Cashman in his report continually references the re license of my dog Shilo
on 10-28-09. Quite apparently Sgt. Cashman failed to contact the Pinal County
Animal Control to verify any license issues regarding my property. Had he
contacted the Pinal County Animal Control it would have been discovered that
my property was licensed to me and me alone since the original license was
issued on 1-23-08, see exhibit 3 p.1-3. Had he contacted myself or Pinal County
Animal Control he would have discovered this to be a fact. Further he would
have discovered that someone called in on 12-29-09 and canceled my legal dog
license with the explanation MOVE AWAY.
3) Sgt. Cashman states Sgt Leblanc learned of the suspended drivers license well
after he arrived at the traffic stop on Woodruff, yet in Det. Goodes report of the
traffic stop he states that he phoned Sgt. Leblanc, informing him of the suspended
license prior to Sgt. Leblanc reaching the scene with Det. Pile.
4) I was never aware of having a suspended license, I never received any notification
regarding a suspended license nor did I ever represent that I had taken care of a
suspended license. On 12-2-09 I provided proof of taking care of my traffic ticket
with the City of Casa Grande, the document I provided to Sgt Leblanc was the
letter from DMV dated 09-22-09 which voided the suspended license plate on one
of my trucks, exhibit 4, p.4. It should be noted that the traffic ticket issued by
Det. Goode was dismissed by the County Attorney for no reasonable likelihood
of conviction. It amazes me that the explination to the County Attorneys office
was sufficient to dismiss the ticket but not adequate for Sgt. Cashman, or is this
another piece of evidence he chose to overlook. Please see all of exhibit 4.
5) Carol Dixon made statements that she spoke to a clerk at the Casa Grande Justice
Court. I will make a small leap of faith that that clerk was none other than
Mercedes Clark, Cpl Stephen Clarks wife. This is another piece of information
Sgt. Cashman would have found out had he done just a little effort in his
investigation.
6) Carol Dixon also stated that she spoke to a Casa Grande Police officer, an
unknown officer. Here again it would take a very small leap of faith to realize
that that officer was actually Cpl. Mike Bejarano, whose wife, Lizz Bejarano, is
the branch manager in Casa Grande for the Pinal County Federal Credit Union.
This is the same institution and branch Carol Dixon works for and has an intimate
relationship with Lizz Bejarano. It beggs to question why this information was
not disclosed.
7) Had Sgt. Cashman called or otherwise interviewed me he would have found out
that Cpl. Clark first contacted me on 11-17-09 as represented by my phone bill,
see exhibit 9. It would have also been very apparent that at that time I told him in
a 3 minute phone call, Shilo, my dog, was legally my property and all the issues
in question were a civil matter. I also informed him that my dog Shilo had always
been licanced to me, was a gift from my ex wife prior to our marriage and had
- 2 -
been with me since she was given to me. Sgt. Cashman would have also seen the
pattern of events of Carol Dixon going to every institution, but never filing any
paperwork anywhere. It would have also been apparent that Cpl. Clark and the
other deputies then decided to take matters into their own hands and steal my
property from me without regard to any evidence supporting my claim. All of
which was available with a simple phone call to county agencies.

To call the internal investigation report Sgt. Cashman prepared a whitewash would be a
compliment. The report does not even match the theft reports etc. provided by the
officers he was supposed to investigate. His final conclusions were a little accurate in
that this was a civil matter but what little facts that were presented were twisted in a
manner to strictly support the actions of the officers in question, this does nothing for
public trust or his oath of office.

CPL. STEPHEN CLARK

Cpl. Stephen Clark is the beginning of this total breach of public trust and the beginning
of the lies and deceit that has led up to the events of today.

1) Cpl. Clark in any and all reports and statements has failed to mention that he
called me on 11-17-09, see exhibit 9, demanding that I return my dog Shilo to
Carol Dixon. At that point he sent Carol Dixon on a goose chase to the Superior
Court, Justice Court, Casa Grande Police, see exhibit 6 p. 21-22. In his report and
the internal investigation Cpl. Clark represents that the first time he spoke to
Carol Dixon was on 12-1-09, that is nothing less that a bold faced lie when he
called me on 11-17-09.
2) Cpl. Clark never asked me for any evidence to support my claim of ownership,
rather he strictly insisted that I give my property to Carol Dixon or I would be
charged with theft, that in itself is theft by extortion.
3) Cpl. Clark apparently never verified Carol Dixons claim of the dog being
licensed to her, otherwise he would have found through Pinal County Animal
Control the dog had always been licensed to me.
4) Cpl. Clark never verified the microchip information for the dog, rather ran
forward with a false claim.

To put it bluntly, Cpl. Stephen Clark in no way shape or form performed his duties as an
officer of the law. He knowingly took the law into his own hands and used his authority
to pursue his own personal desires. He had from 11-17-09 until 12-01-09 to investigate
this case which could have included asking me to come in and talk to him, there was no
investigation rather a decision to do the bidding of Carol Dixon, a Commercial Loan
Officer. It would be very interesting to see if Cpl. Carks side business Diamondback
Protective Services has received any funding through the Pinal County Federal Credit
Union.

- 3 -
SGT. PHILLIP LEBLANC

Sgt. Leblanc is probably the most despicable individuals involved in this sad state of
affairs. As late as 2007 Sergeant Phil LeBlanc was in the Professional Standards unit
charged with investigating complaints on sworn staff, he served in this unit with Sgt.
John Ellsworth, interesting that apparently Sgt. Ellsworth is willing to lie for his former
partner. The following are the inconsistencies involved with his activities in this matter.

1) Sgt. Lebalnc agrees to take over the case from Cpl. Clark, exhibit 6 p.16 pp 2.
After taking over the case Sgt. Leblanc never verified any of the supposed
evidence, talked to myself or asked for any other version than what was pre
conceived. He never verified any dog license information with Pinal County
Animal Control otherwise he would have realized the dog was always registered
to me.
2) Sgt. Leblanc states that he learned of my drivers license being suspended after
reaching the scene and informing me that I was going to give up the dog and had
no choice in the matter, exhibit 6, p 18 pp4-5. Sgt. Leblanc knew my drivers
license was suspended before he reached the scene of the traffic stop per phone
call from Det. Goode, exhibit 8 p.51 pp.2.
3) In Exhibit 6 p. 19 pp 4-5 implies that I lied to him regarding having a suspended
drivers license and could not produce any paperwork showing I had taken care of
the suspension issue. I DID NOT KNOW MY DRIVERS LICENSE WAS
SUSPENDED. I knew I had a ticket with the City of Casa Grande and believed I
had taken care of that ticket. I provided Sgt. Leblanc with a letter from DMV
showing my registration was suspended in error and informed him that I had
taken that letter to the Casa Grande Justice Court and was told the ticket was
dismissed, see exhibit 4 all inclusive.
4) Sgt. Leblanc did inform me that if I did not give up my dog he would arrest me
for driving on a suspended license and impound my truck, his mind was made up
and he had a plan.
5) In the analysis of Exhibit 6 p20 pp3, it is very clear that the threat of arrest for
driving on a suspended license did in fact occour. Had I not turned over my
property to Sgt. Leblanc he would have arrested me for driving on a suspended
license and taken the dog anyway. At no point in time did I cooperate willingly,
rather I submitted to the threat of extortion. I have 2 children that I am solely
responsible for, what else was I going to do with 3 armed thugs.
6) On 12-8-09 Sgt Leblanc states that he received a packet of paperwork with
statements from individuals stating the dog was mine. Also in that packet was
paperwork showing the dog license information which included pages 4,5,6,8,9 of
exhibit 3. These same exhibits were provided to Sgt. Leblanc on 12-2-09 when he
took my dog. Page 4 clearly shows that Shilo was licensed to me for the entire
year ending 09-04-09. This at the very least should have stopped all actions at
that moment as it completely disproves his statement This dog was licensed to
Mrs. Dixon, Exhibit 8 p20.

- 4 -
Sgt. Leblanc, being the previous head of his area of the Professional Standards Unit does
know the proper procedures of investigation, the rules behind illegal search and seizure,
due process etc. With malice and forethought he decided single handed to help her when
no one else would. He ignored all policy and procedure and rather reverted to the show
of lethal force and extortion to accomplish his personal goals. In the whole process he
never verified any of the allegations represented, but when I presented him with the
evidence I had at the time he choked for a minute but continued forward with the threat
that if I gave him any trouble over this he would come back and arrest me for driving on
a suspended license, well that charged was dismissed by the County Attorney.

CAROL DIXON

If we accept the reports of Sgt. Cashman, Sgt. Lebalnc, Cpl Clark and the public record
of the City of Casa Grande then the following statements are true and factual and should
be delt with accordingly.

1) Carol Dixon reported to Sgt. Cashman that she lived alone with Shilo from mid
May 2009. We did not move out to our old residence until mid June 2009, at
which time Shilo moved with us, exhibit 6 p 21 pp3. False reporting to a police
officer.
2) Carol Dixon reported to Cpl. Clark that I offered to watch the dog for her while
she moved. The dog was always in my possession, licensed to me, living with
me, see statements and affidavits provided. False reporting to a police officer.
3) Carol Dixon reported to Cpl. Clark that I relicensed the dog, naming myself as the
owner. The dog was always licensed to me as the owner, she never owned the
dog, see exhibit 3.
4) Carol Dixon said she had a microchip registered to her, that registration was
acquired by fraudulent means which can be both false reporting to a police officer
and falsifying a public document (a class 6 felony).
5) On 12-29-09 Carol Dixon called the Pinal County Animal Control and had my
valid dog license cancelled giving the explanation of MOVE AWAY. The
license has since been reinstated and is the only valid and legal dog license. This
constitutes a class 6 felony of altering a public document along with a
misdemeanor of removing a dog license.
6) Please see Exhibit 1 all inclusive for the several felonies and misdemeanors
which have occurred in the process of securing a dog license through the City of
Casa Grande.
7) On several occasions within the reports Carol Dixon relies on the fact that she
purchased the dog, which she did, as a gift for me prior to our marriage. It should
be noted that the Hon. Kevin White upheld our divorce decree and stated the
division of property and decree stands as is, see exhibit 8 p.11 item 5d, and
exhibit 11.

I should be noted that these are just a partial list of the charges that should be brought
against Carol Dixon. This whole situation began with Carol Dixon becoming upset
because my daughter, a 14 year old teenager, wanted to go to the mall with her friends
- 5 -
- 6 -
and not babysit when demanded, followed by myself not taking Carol Dixons side over
my daughters. The house of cards made up of lies is falling and the facts can not be
ignored any longer. Whatever the hold Carol Dixon has over the individuals involved
can easily be uncovered through some simple subpoenas and a very small amount of
investigation, which would of course help clean up our whole county system.

RACHEL GUILLEN

Ms. Guillens part of this conspiracy is very simple. On Sunday, January 3, 2010
she opened up the City of Casa Grande finance department and knowingly used
falsified information to procure a dog license for Carol Dixon. She completely
ignored her duty, the law and violated the public trust as a city employee by
participating in the acts as outlined in exhibit 1. Ms. Guillen should be prosecuted
to the fullest extent of the law for betraying the public trust placed in her.

It has become apparent to myself that many of the acts above and many others were
encouraged if not initiated by Deputy Pinal County Attorney Joe A. Albo, along with
more to come. Please review exhibit 2 in its entirety. I am sure that one to come soon
will be an attempt to bring a charge of theft against me for possession of a stolen vehicle,
please see exhibit 7. The situation that is building here smells of the same type of
situation which occurred with Ms. Patti Lee who was indicted for assaulting a sheriffs
deputy over a year after that same deputy severely assaulted her. Our county and county
attorneys office will resort to the most vicious means to accomplish their goals, protect
their friends, keep the good ole boy system intact and ignore their duty.

Every item mentioned here is true and factual. There is an additional 400+ pages of
evidence to back up these charges and many others, in just these cases. I am writing this
letter because Wally Catton among others assures me that you have an extreme desire to
clean up the corruption in Pinal County andwill act swiftly to remedy these problems. I
believe and support the law enforcement agencies and individuals who put their lives on
the line every day for the citizens of this country, it is sad though that a few bad apples do
such deplorable things which results in the honor and integrity of the majority being
tarnished.

I wish to have each and every charge brought and am at your disposal to bring these
charges along with the evidence which has been accumulated.

Thank You,

Mark E. Dixon
March 15,2010
City of Casa Grande
Brett Wallace, City Attorney
510 E. Florence Blvd.
SENT BYFAX. CERTIFIED MAILRETURNIRECIEPTREQUESTEDAND EMAIL
Mr. Wallace,
I received an email March 11,2010, from Edith Regan, the City Clerk's Office Assistant
regarding my Public Record Request. She indicated a need for clarification regarding
Section III, item 3. If you would look at the earlier request, dated February 22, 2010,
which this one refers back to, the individual in question is City of Casa Grande employee
Rachel Guillen. To clarify my request please provide all payroll records beginning the
pay period which includes Sunday, January 3, 2010, thru the current pay period,
including all time cards, electronic signatures, official leave and earnings statements, and
all approved comp time/overtime requests for the City of Casa Grande employee Rachel
Guillen.
For clarification on Section III item 1, Ms. Regan replied "We are not in possession of
any responsive documents". The information provided in response to my February 22,
2010 request included a printout from the Casa Grande Animal Hospital. This document
was apparently utilized as the rabies certificate for issuance of the dog license and
receipt# R10-000015. The printout from Casa Grande Animal Hospital had Mark
Dixon's information "marked-out" as the owner and Carol Dixon's name, address and
phone number hand written in, as the owner. The alteration of this document and
subsequent use for receipt# RIO-00015 is in direct violation of ARS 11-1010 and City of
Casa Grande Code. This constitutes a class 6 felony.
For clarification on Section III item 2, Ms Regan replied "we are not in possession of any
responsive documents". The information provided in response to my February 22, 2010
request included a printout from Avid, PETtrac Data Verification. This document was
presented as documentation for receipt# R10-000016, registration of Avid microchip
#036285557. The information attached to my request included a letter from Carter
Metcalf DVM of Casa Grande Animal Hospital, and a certificate from Avid. The above
mentioned printout from Casa Grande Animal Hospital clearly shows that the microchip
was implanted by John McWhirter DVM practicing at Casa Grande Animal Hospital, not
Dr. James Hapak of the Small Animal Clinic PC. Again submitting the altered document
with falsified information as a public record is in direct violation of ARS 11-1010, which
again constitutes a class 6 felony.
In our meeting on Wednesday, March 10,2010, we discussed the City of Casa Grande's
liability caused by the City of Casa Grande's employee Rachel Guillen and Carol Dixon.
Further, we discussed the fact that Rachel Guillen and Carol Dixon are in direct violation
1

mark dixon/pcso complaints/9-5-10
EXHIBIT 1
1 of 14
of ARS 11-1010, as well as ARS 39-161 which constitutes a class 6 felony. I should
remind you that Carol Dixon is in violation of ARS 11-1008 (E), which is a class 2
misdemeanor.
You informed me that you, as City Attorney, did not have the authority to prosecute a
felony charge as this authority is reserved by the Office of the Pinal County Attorney. I
advised you that I would be glad to prefer charges through the Casa Grande Police
Department, but questioned whether they would even take a report without your
authorization, you nodded your head in agreement. Clearly you, as the City Attorney
have the authority to enforce laws broken within the City of Casa Grande.
You have failed to contact me regarding these crucial issues, as you stated you would,
therefore it is implied that you, and/or or the Pinal County Attorneys Office are not
willing to uphold your sworn duty and prosecute these violations. I will caution you at
this time, this is unquestionably a continuance of the conspiracy started by Carol Dixon
and the Pinal County Sheriffs Deputies which began on December 1,2009, as outlined
in District Court Cases CIV'092650PHXSRB and CIV' 100325PHXDKD. By failing to
pursue prosecution of these issues, considering the in depth knowledge you have with
these cases, your inaction clearly implies that you and the City of Casa Grande may be
participants in the conspiracies outlined in these two cases.
I hereby give you formal notice and request that these allegations are to be added as
additional charges to the claim against the City of Casa Grande which was properly
served on the City of Casa Grande on February 2,2010. Please contact me in writing if
my conclusions are unfounded.
Sincerely,
P.O. Box 12695
Phone (520)-705-2945
Email: md20033@yahoo.com
Cc: Tom McMahon, Southwest Risk Services
Scott Barber, City of Casa Grande
2

EXHIBIT 1
2 of 14

EXHIBIT 1
3 of 14

EXHIBIT 1
4 of 14

EXHIBIT 1
5 of 14

EXHIBIT 1
6 of 14

EXHIBIT 1
7 of 14

EXHIBIT 1
8 of 14

EXHIBIT 1
9 of 14

EXHIBIT 1
10 of 14

EXHIBIT 1
11 of 14

EXHIBIT 1
12 of 14

EXHIBIT 1
13 of 14

EXHIBIT 1
14 of 14

-1-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Marc A. Appel, Esq., #010759
APPEL LAW OFFICE, P.L.L.C.
10601 N. Hayden Rd., Suite I-103
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
Telephone: (480) 315-1216
Facsimile: (480) 315-1218
Email: Marc.appel@azbar.org

Attorney for Defendants Pinal County,
James Walsh and Paul Babeu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Mark E. Dixon,

PLAINTIFF,

v.

1. PINAL COUNTY, a Political
Subdividsion;

2. JAMES WALSH, Pinal County Attorney,
in his Official Capacity Only;

3. PAUL BABEU, Pinal County Sheriff,

4. PETE RIOS, Pinal County Supervisor

5. BRYAN MARTYN, Pinal County
Supervisor, in his Official Capacity Only;

6. DAVID SNIDER, Pinal County

et. al.

DEFENDANTS.

No. CIV 10 0325 PHX DGC

PINAL COUNTY DEFENDANTS FIRST
SUPPLEMENTAL RULE 26(a)(1)
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendants Pinal
County, James Walsh and Paul Babeu (hereinafter the Pinal County Defendants) make their
first supplemental disclosure as follows:

EXHIBIT 2
1 of 12

-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
(A) The name and, if know, the address and telephone number of each individual likely to
have discoverable information that the disclosing party may use to support its claims or defenses,
unless solely for impeachment, indentifying the subjects of the information:

1. Sgt. John Ellsworth [Pinal County Sheriffs Office, 971 N. Jason Lopez Circle,
Building C, Florence, Arizona, 85132 (520) 866-5133]: This witness may testify regarding the
following subjects: His conversation with Carol Lee Dixon when Ms. Dixon advised her of her
ex-husbands theft of her dog and Sgt. Ellsworth suggestion that Ms. Dixon see if the issue could
be resolved through the civil courts rather than as a criminal prosecution and his subsequent
conversation with Mr. Dixon.
2. Karna Buckner [Casa Grande Justice Court, Precinct Two, 820 E. Cottonwood
Lane, Casa Grande, Arizona, 85122 (520) 866-7404]: This witness may testify regarding the
following subjects: Her knowledge regarding Mr. Dixons complaints regarding the Casa
Grande Justice Court and any information she has regarding Carol Lee Dixon contacting the
Casa Grande Justice Court concerning the taking of civil action against her husband for his theft
of her dog and Ms. Dixon being referred back to the Pinal County Sheriffs Office because all
the civil courts could do was award her damages.
3. Lt. Tamatha Villar [Pinal County Sheriffs Office, 971 N. Jason Lopez Circle,
Building C, Florence, Arizona, 85132 (520) 866-5133]: This witness may testify regarding the
following subjects: Her knowledge of the Pinal County Sheriffs web site that includes
frequently asked questions and why, based upon her understanding of the facts underlying this
case as they relate to Carol Lee Dixons claim that Mr. Dixon stole her dog, that the matter was
not a civil matter.
DATED this 18
th
day of June, 2010.

By /s/ Marc A. Appel___________________
Marc A. Appel, Esq.
10601 N. Hayden Road, Suite I-103
Attorney for Defendants Pinal County,
James Walsh and Paul Babeu

COPY of the foregoing mailed and emailed
this 18
th
day of June, 2010, to:

EXHIBIT 2
2 of 12

-3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
William J. Pearlman, Esq.
1237 S. Val Vista Dr., Ste. 101
Mesa, AZ 85204
Attorney for Plaintiff
Pearllaw@hotmail.com

/s/ Heather Coover

EXHIBIT 2
3 of 12

EXHIBIT 2
4 of 12

EXHIBIT 2
5 of 12

EXHIBIT 2
6 of 12

EXHIBIT 2
7 of 12

EXHIBIT 2
8 of 12

-1-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Marc A. Appel, Esq., #010759
10601 N. Hayden Rd., Suite I-103
Telephone: (480) 315-1216
Facsimile: (480) 315-1218
Email: Marc.appel@azbar.org

Attorney for Pinal County, James Walsh and Paul Babeu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Mark E. Dixon,

PLAINTIFF,

v.

1. PINAL COUNTY, a Political
Subdividsion;

2. JAMES WALSH, Pinal County Attorney,

3. PAUL BABEU, Pinal County Sheriff,

4. PETE RIOS, Pinal County Supervisor

5. BRYAN MARTYN, Pinal County

6. DAVID SNIDER, Pinal County

et. al.

DEFENDANTS.

No. CIV 10 0325 PHX DGC

THE PINAL COUNTY
DEFENDANTS SEPARATE
MEMORANDUM SETTING FORTH
THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS
WITH RESPECT TO THE
REMAINDER OF THE CASE

The Pinal County defendants, by and through undersigned counsel, submit the
following separate memorandum setting forth the Pinal County defendants
recommendations with respect to the remainder of the case as ordered by the court. The
Pinal County defendants are submitting a separate memorandum because they do not

Case 2:10-cv-00325-DGC Document 46 Filed 09/03/10 Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT 2
9 of 12

-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
agree with the plaintiffs recommendation that the case proceed to an expedited trial in
a manner consistent with the point and authorities outlined. Rather, the Pinal County
defendants recommend that the case be withdrawn from the expedited trial process and
moved back to the standard track which permits the filing of dispositive motions.
The Pinal County defendants recommendation that the case be removed from
the expedited trial process is supported by the following:
1. The manner in which the plaintiffs complaint is drafted has led to a
confusion of the issues. As the court will recall from the parties proposed final pretrial
order and the discussions during the final pretrial conference, it was clear from the
courts inquiries to the plaintiffs attorney that the plaintiffs attorney was not clear
regarding the issues that were being raised by the plaintiffs complaint. As it was also
made clear during the final pretrial conference that the Pinal County defendants
attorney considered the issues raised by the plaintiffs complaint to be different than
what was at least partially clarified by the courts inquiries to the plaintiffs attorney.
For example, based upon inquiries from the court, it appeared that the plaintiff was
moving from a Fourth Amendment case to a substantive due process case and then to a
whitewashing case. The filing of dispositive motions will resolve that confusion and
narrow the issues.
The confusion of the issues is most recently demonstrated by the plaintiffs
memorandum with respect to the remainder of the case. In that memorandum, the
plaintiff, for the first time, asserts a due process claim. While it is not clear whether
the plaintiff is attempted to assert a substantive or a procedural due process claim, the
words due process are not even contained in the plaintiffs complaint. In addition to
the new claims attempting to be asserted, there are new factual allegations being
asserted that are not related to the allegations contained in the plaintiffs complaint.
Those new factual allegations involve alleged actions by a Deputy County Attorney
(which are denied) that have nothing to do with the plaintiffs complaint which, as
currently understood, alleges a failure to prosecute claim against the County Attorney.
There are also new allegations of withholding and fabricating evidence (which are

EXHIBIT 2
10 of 12

-3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
denied) which are not related to the allegations of the plaintiffs complaint.
All of the foregoing issues, and the more that will probably be raised during a
dispositive motion process, will be resolved through motion practice. Then, if any
issues remain, they can be tried. However, without first resolving the current confusion
of the issues and the narrowing of the issues, it has been made clear that trying the case
will be difficult, if not impossible.
2. There are legal issues involving collateral estoppel and prosecutorial
immunity that are going to be procedurally difficult to deal with in an expedited trial
proceeding. Those procedural issues were raised by the court during the final pretrial
conference. Removing the case from the expedited trial process will permit the court to
resolve those legal issues through dispositive motions.
3. The fact that the plaintiffs attorney has moved to withdraw and that the
plaintiff will soon once again be representing himself has the potential of clarifying and
narrowing the issues without the benefit of dispositive motions even more challenging.
That is most clearly demonstrated by the new legal and factual allegations being raised
by the plaintiffs memorandum setting forth his recommendations with respect to the
remainder of the case.
For the foregoing reasons, and for the additional issues previously raised in the
parties proposed final pretrial order and during the September 3, 2010 final pretrial
conference, the Pinal County defendants request that this case be withdrawn from the
expedited trial process and it be moved to the standard track.
Dated this 3
rd
day of September, 2010.

By /s/ Marc Appel _________________
Marc A. Appel, Esq.
10601 N. Hayden Road, Suite I-103
Attorney for Pinal County, James
Walsh and Paul Babeu


EXHIBIT 2
11 of 12

-4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ORIGINAL of the foregoing electronically filed
this 3
rd
day of September, 2010, to:

United States District Court of Arizona
Clerk of the Court
401 W. Washington
Phoenix, Arizona 85003

COPY of the foregoing mailed and emailed
this 3
rd
day of September, 2010, to:

Mark E. Dixon
PO Box 12695
Casa Grande, Arizona 85130
Pro Se

William J. Pearlman, Esq.
1237 S. Val Vista Dr., Ste. 101
Mesa, AZ 85204
Attorney for Plaintiff
Pearllaw@hotmail.com
(motion to withdraw pending)_

/s/ Heather Coover


EXHIBIT 2
12 of 12

EXHIBIT 3
1 of 19
K
i
l
l
e
d

b
y

c
o
y
o
t
e
s

a
s

e
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
d

b
y

L
a
d
d
y
'
s

c
o
r
p
s
e

d
i
s
c
o
v
e
r
e
d

b
y

p
l
a
i
n
t
i
f
f

d
i
s
c
o
v
e
r
e
d

a
t

a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
l
y

5
:
0
0

a
.
m
.

o
n

t
h
e

m
o
r
n
i
n
g

o
f

S
u
n
d
a
y
,

J
u
n
e

1
4
,

2
0
0
7
.

P
l
a
i
n
t
i
f
f

h
a
d

b
e
e
n

s
e
a
r
c
h
i
n
g

f
o
r

"
L
a
d
d
y
"

s
i
n
c
e

2
:
0
0

a
.
m
.

L
a
d
d
y

i
s

b
u
r
i
e
d

a
t

1
0
3
8
0

W
.

P
a
s
a
d
e
n
a
,

t
h
e

h
o
m
e

t
h
e

P
l
a
i
n
t
i
f
f

b
e
l
i
e
v
e
s

L
a
d
d
y

w
a
s

t
r
y
i
n
g

t
o

g
e
t

b
a
c
k

t
o
o
.

EXHIBIT 3
2 of 19
PINAL-COUNTY
W"Wt oprn "pporlunily
Pinal County Animal Care and Control
764 S. Eleven Mile Comer Road, Casa Grande, AZ 85222
(520) 509-3555 (520) 866-7610 FAX www.pinalcountyaz.gov
Receipt Number: R08-005993
Person Information:MARK DIXON
PO BOX 12695
CASA GRANDE, AZ 85230
Receipt Date: Thursday, September 04,2008
PID: P007938
Received From: MARK DIXON
Check No: 1522 Phone: (520) 705-2945
Item: AnimallD: Reference No: Price: Each: Amount:
L1C UNALTER
Animal Information:
A055356 L08-025851 $20.00 1
Total Fees Due:
Payments: Cash:
Check:
Credit Card:
Total Payments Received:
Thank You!
Change:
Balance Due:
$20.00
$20.00
$0.00
$20.00
$0.00
$20.00
$0.00
$0.00
A055356 SHILOH - OF AGE, FEMALE, AUST SHEPHERD, WHITE DOG
License Information:
Tag Number: Expires: Animal#
L08-025851 09/04/09 A055356
Vacc Date:
07/31/08
Term: Expires: Amount: Type:
36 07/31/11 $20.00 L1CUNALTER
HAL LICENSE FEES: $20.00
Cleric CathyF SHELTER
Shelter Hours
Monday - Friday 8:00AM - 5:00PM" Saturday 9:00AM - 12:00PM"
Shelters CLOSED Sundays and Holidays
Transaction Date: 09/04/08 Print Date: 01/28/10 ware\Chameleon\Crystal\receipt.rpt

EXHIBIT 3
3 of 19
PINAL-COUNTY
Mb uptll DpprmlmilJ
Pinal County Animal Care And Control
P.O. Box 3061RS
Casa Grande, AZ 85222
(520)509-3555
License Tag: L 0 8 ~ 0 2 5 8 5 1
Tag Expiration Date: 09/04/09
Rabies Expiration Date: 07/31/11
Dog's Name: SHILOH
Breed: AUST SHEPHERD
Color: WHITE
Sex: Female
DOB: 01/01/07
Payment Due: $20.00
Want to help us save money to care for the animals and get your renewal notices faster? Give us your email address
and we can send your next renewal notice electronically!
MARK DIXON
PO BOX 12695
Email: _
Phone: (520) 705-2945
RETURN THIS PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT, RABIES AND ALTER CERTIFICATES IF REQUIRED
MARK DIXON
License Expires: 09/04/09
Rabies Vaccination Expires: 07/31/11
Avoid penalties. Renew by: 10/04109
L08-025851
License Fee Due: $20.00
* If your t has
veterinarian to rec
ltered, you m t Include a copy of the altering certificate issued by your
a reduced cost license.
We are sending you this notice to inform you that your dog's license will expire on 09/04/09. A $2.00 late penalty will be added
if the license is not renewed by the end of the 30-day grace period.
As of June 1, 2003, the dog licensing fees are as follows:
* Altered: $12.00 per year
* Unaltered: $20.00 per year.
* Altered $30.00 for three years.
* Senior Citizen (Based on Owner's Age) Altered $6.00 per year.
* Senior Citizen (Based on Owner's Age) Altered $18.00 for three years.
You may buy a multiple year license, depending on the rabies vaccination expiration. The rabies vaccination must be valid
through the full license period.
You may renew your dog's license at our office Monday - Friday from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM and 9:00 AM to 12:00 PM on
Saturdays. You may also renew your dog's license by mail.
Please make the check payable to: Pinal County Animal Care and Control.
Please contact our office immediately if you have moved or no longer have your dog.
Please call with any questions.
P007938 A055356
101
EXHIBIT 3
4 of 19

......
764 . Eleven :viile Comer Road, Casa Grande, AZ 5222
C20) 509-3555 (520) 66-7610 fAX www.pinalcoun '3Z.g0'v
Receipt Number. R09.Q1&465
PO BOX 12695
CASA GRANDE, AZ. 85194
Received From; MARl< DIXO Checlc. No:
Rece;pt Date: Wednesday. October 28, 2009
PID. P064051
Phone: (520) 2052945
Item: AnlmallD' Reference 0: Price Each. I',moun
UCUNALTER A093285 l09-Q38672 520.00 20.00
$0.00
$000
$20.00
$20.00
$0.00
$0.00
S20.00
Total Fees Due:
Oayments: Cash.
Ched<.:
Credrt Card:
=====
Thank You!
Change:
Balance Due'
Animal Information:
A09328S SHILO OF AGE. FEMALE. AUST SHEPHERD. BROWN AND WHITE DOG
Ucense inform<rtion:
Tag Number: Expires; Animal# Vacc Date: Tenn: Expires: Amount: Type:
L09038672 10128110 A093285 10J2a109 12 101281 0 $20.00 LIe NALTER
>TAL UCENSE FEES: S20.OO
Cieri<' CathyF SHELTER
.er HOUrS
Monday Friday 8':ooAM - 5:00PM' Saturday 9-00AM. 12:00PM' EXHI BIT 2
Shelters CLOSED Sundays and Holidays
Transaction Date 1012 9 Porn Date

EXHIBIT 3
5 of 19
I 036285557 I
MICROCHIP UM2>ER
1l1lllllll11lllll1llllII,
AVID*036*285*557
AVID
MicroChip
DATe
This Certifies t at__ --lo..C.aa..un.L!:jn.l.lOe _
,,"ol,e SpeCiES
Ausmman Shepherd ;tt4-30-0i
has been identified with the above number by:
John McWhirter, DVM
Address
BroWriJ White
1645 North Pinal Avenue, Casa Grande, AZ
The holder of said animal 15 .,...........,.-,..,......-- _
'Jo."e Mark Dixon
P.O:1fox12695 Casa Grande, AZ 85230
transferable 0 lyon he books of Avid by the holder hereof in person or by attorney upon
surrender of this certifica e properly endorsed.
111llli IfIDll[nll1
AVID*036*285*557

EXHIBIT 3
6 of 19
RABIES VACClNATIO.. CERTni'ICAIT
A LEGAL DOClJME iT ISSlJED 10-28-09 BY CASA GRANDE ANIMAL HOSPlTAi.
Patient. arne: ShilCl
'. pecie.:
Breed:
Color:
ex:
Canine
ustralian Shepherd
Brown/Whit
r
Date r)f f->irrh: 04-30-07
Weight: 39.00 IDs
Mic ochip#: 036285557
O'vmer Information: Mark Dixon
P.O. B x12695
Casa Grande. AI. 85230
(520)205-294-
Date of Vaccination: 10-28-09 Expiration Date: 10-28-10
Rabie: Vaccine Information- MFG: MERlA. L<>t #: 12531 A Vaccine Exp: 19MAYI0
Casa Grande .A..nimal Hospilal
1645 onh Pinal Avenue
Casa Grande. Arizona 85222
Phone: (520) 836-5979 Fax: (520) 836-0391
VeterinaI'ian:
License Number:
John McW1rirter, DVM
3090
D 1's Signature: EXHIBIT 3

EXHIBIT 3
7 of 19
RABIES VACCINATION CERTIFICATE
A LEGAL DOCUMENT ISSUED 10-28-09 BY CASA GRANDE ANIMAL HOSPITAL
Patient Name: Shilo
Date of birth: 04-30-07
Microchip#: 036285557
39.00 Ibs
BrownlWhite
Australian Shepherd
Canine
F
Owner Information: Mark Dixon
P.O. Box 12695
Weight:
Color:
Sex:
Breed:
Species:
(520)705-2945
Date of Vaccination: 10-28-09 Expiration Date: 10-28-10
Rabies Vaccine Information- MFG: MERIA Lot #: 12531A Vaccine Exp: 19MAY1 0
Casa Grande Animal Hospital
1645 North Pinal Avenue
Casa Grande, Arizona 85122
Phone: (520) 836-5979 Fax: (520) 836-0391
Veterinarian: John McWhirter, DVM
License Number: 3090
g ~ ~ ~ g n ~ W ~ ~ pJY)

EXHIBIT 3
8 of 19
INVOICE
Casa Grande Animal Hospital
1645 N. Pinal Ave.
520-836-5979
FOR: MarK Dixon
P.O. Box12OO5
Printed:
Date;
Account:
Invoice:
10-28-09 at 336p
10-28-09
6753
298089
Date For Net Price
Services by John McWhirter, DVM
10-28-09 SMo
10-28-09
1028-09
10-28-09
10-28-09
10-28-09
10-28-09
1 DHLPP+Corona - Booster
1 Bordatella Canine - Intranasal
1 Rabies - Canine 1 Year
1 HeartwormlErt1lichiaflymeslAP Test
1 Microchip Placement
1 OffiCe Visit - We!lness Exam - Sm Animal
6 Heartgard Plus Green 1 month
16.00
8.00
8.00
30.00 ....
33.00
24.00
3499
Services by
10-28-09 Visa. payment -153.99
Old balance
0.00
Charges payments
153.99 153.99
Discount
22,00-
New balance
0.00
Your invoice total reflects our (unnamed) discou.nt.
10-28-09
1028-09
10-28-09
10-28-09

Tlll: 15'11

IW\IIl!\ t1

I: ,5
OCT tS, a,
S/liCIH is!
..__ .... _.__...
1028-10 DHLPP+Corona - Booster
10-28-10 Heartworm Test
10-28-10 Bordatella - Canine - Jntranas
10-2810 Rabies - Canine - 3 Year
0426-10 Heartgard Plus Preventative
Doctor's Instructions
Microchip Placement
If any changes to your acklress and phone please oonlact Casa Grande Animal
Hospital so we can update your microchip lnfonnation.
TOTAL
51.53.99
Rabies - Canine - 1 Year
Pinal County Rabies/Animal Control, P.O. Box 3061
Cass Grande, p,;z 85294 Phone: 509-3555
Cass Grande City Hall. 510 E. Florence Blvd.
! AERiE 10 PQ'I
IittORliIIlt 10 C..
AGRitm iF
CGP'i
EXHIBIT 4

EXHIBIT 3
9 of 19

EXHIBIT 3
10 of 19
City of Casa Grande
510 E Florence Blvd, Casa Grande, AZ 85222
(520) 421-8601 City Hall (520) 426-9300 Animal Control (520) 876-5992 Fax
Legal Document - Keep Safe and Available at All Times
Receipt Number: R10-000016
Person Information:CAROL DIXON
720 W O'NEIL DR #232
Receipt Date: Sunday, January 03,2010
PID: P006228
Received From: CAROL DIXON Check No:
Phone: (480) 794-0844
Item:
MICROCHIP
Tag Expires
11/1/29
AnimallD:
A011442
Reference No:
036285557
Price:
$.00
Each:
1
Amount
$.00
Anima/Information:
Total Fees Due:
Payments: Cash:
Check:
Credit Card:
Thank You!
Change:
Balance Due:
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
A011442 SHILOH - 3 YEARS OF AGE, FEMALE, AUST SHEPHERD, BROWN AND WHITE DOG
Vaccination Information:
Animal#: Vaccine:
A011442
Serial No.:
AVID
Vacc. Date: Term: Expires:
o
Veterinarian:
HAPAK
10
G001419
RGuilien
SHELTER

CitY Hall: Friday8:00Ml.
Shelter: Monday Friday 8:00AM 4:00PM
Sheller CLOSED Weekends and Holidays
Transaction Dale: 01103110 Print Date: 02J04110 on software\chameleon\crystal\receipl.rpt

EXHIBIT 3
11 of 19
City of Casa Grande
510 E Florence Blvd, Casa Grande! AZ 85222
(520) 421-8601 City Hall (520) 426-9300 Animal Control (520) 876-5992 Fax
Legal Document - Keep Safe and Available at An Times
Receipt Number. R1D-OOOO15
Person Informafiol'l:CAROl DIXON
720 WO'NEIL DR #232
Receipt nate: Sunday, January 03,2010
PIO: P006228
Received From: CAROL DIXON Check No: phone: (480) 794-0844
Item: Tag Expires Animal 10: Reference No: Price: Each: Amount:
10128/10 A011442 L09-009186 $25.00 1
Tetal Fees Due:
Payments: Cash:
Check:
CrdCarrJ:
Total Payments ReceIved:
ThankYoul
Change:
Balance Due:
$25.00
$25.00
$0.00
$25.00
$0.00
$25.00
$0.00
$0.00
Animallnfonnation:
A011442 SHILOH -3 YEARS OF AGE, FEMALE, AUST SHEPHERD, BROWN AND WHITE DOG
Vaccination Infonnation:
Animal#: Vaccine:
A011442 MER IMRAB3
Serial No.:
12531A
Vacc. Date:
10128109
Term:
12
Expires:
10128110
Veterinarian:
NELSON
10
GOO1802
)feric RGuillen
SHELTER
How"sol'Operations
City Halt Monday - Friday 8:00AM 5:00PM
ShelteI: Monday-Frlday8:OOAM - 4:00PM
SIlellwClOSEDWeekends ami HollGays
TfllllSaClIon Date: 01103/10

EXHIBIT 3
12 of 19
PINAL'COU 'TV

764 S. Eleven Mile Comer Road Casa Grand , AZ 85222
(520) 509-3555 (520) 866-7610 FAX www.pinalcountyaz.go
Receipt Number. R10-021242
PO BOX 12695
Received From: MARK DIXON Check No:
Receipt Date: Wednesday, February 03,2010
PID: P064051
Phone: (520) 205-2945
Item: AnimallD: Reference No: Price: Each: Amount:
L1C REP A093285 L10-041767 $5.00 1 $5.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5.00
$5.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5.00
Total Fees Due:
Payments: Cash:
Check:
Credit Card:
=====
Thank You!
Change:
Balance Due:
Animal Information:
A093285 SHILO - OF AGE, FEMALE, AUST SHEPHERD, BROWN AND WHITE DOG
License Information:
Tag Number: Expires: Animal# Vacc Date: Term: Expires: Amount: Type:
L1 0-041767 10/28/10 A093285 10/28/09 12 10/28/10 $5.00 L1C REP
)TAL ICENSE FEES: $5.00
Monday - Friday 8:00AM - 5.
Shelters CLOS
Clerk: FRNTDESK SHELTER
s
aturday 9:00AM - 12:00PM"
Sl.-lOa,fS and Holidays
Print Date: 02103/10 vare\Chameleon\Crystal\Receipt.rpt

EXHIBIT 3
13 of 19
PERSON INFORMATION
P007938
MARK DIXON
7496 N EVANS RD
COOLIDGE, AZ 85228
TAG INFORMATION
PERSON DOCUMENT
02/03/10
(520) 705-2945
520-705-2945
ANIMAL 10
A009396
A055356
A055356
NAME
LADDY
SHILOH
SHILOH
TAG NO
L04-032221
L08-018400
L08-025851
TYPE
Lie SN
L1C UNALTER
L1C UNALTER
TAGEXP
08/02/05
08/15/08
09/04/09
C:\Proaram Files\Chameleon Software\Chameleon\Crvstal\Person.rot

EXHIBIT 3
14 of 19
PERSON INFORMATION
P064051
MARK DIXON
10380 W PASADENA DR
TAG INFORMATION
PERSON DOCUMENT
02/03/10
(520) 205-2945
ANIMALID
A093285
NAME
SHILO
TAG NO
L09-038672
TYPE
L1C UNALTER
TAG EXP
10/28/10
MEMO HISTORY
MEMO NO DATE TYPE
M10-037336 01/29/1012:00 NOTE
1-29-10
released copies of the license information for Shiloh to Mr. Dixon. He presented a written request.
f. valenzuela
M10-037708 02/03/1012:00 NOTE
***
On 2-3-10 Mark Dixon came into the office seeking information on his dog "Shilo" He purchased a replacement tag for the
amount of $5.00. I (Faye) told him the dogs record had been marked as "Moved Away" He stated to me that he had not
moved and has been separatedldivorced from his wife and would like this license to be re-activated again in his name.
F. Valenzuela
C:\Proaram Files\Chameleon Soflware\Chameleon\Crvstal\Person.rot

EXHIBIT 3
15 of 19
PERSON INFORMATION
P064051
MARK DIXON
10380 W PASADENA DR
TAG INFORMATION
PERSON DOCUMENT
02/03/10
(520) 205-2945
ANIMALID
A093285
A093285
A093285
NAME
SHILO
SHILO
SHILO
TAG NO
L10-041767
036285557
L09-038672
TYPE
L1C REP
MICROCHIP
Lie UNALTER
TAG EXP
10/28/10
10/28/10
10/28/10
MEMO HISTORY
MEMONO DATE TYPE
M10-037336 01/29/1012:00 NOTE
1-29-10
released copies of the license information for Shiloh to Mr. Dixon. He presented a written request.
f. valenzuela
M10-037708 02/03/1012:00 NOTE
***
On 2-3-10 Mark Dixon came into the office seeking information on his dog "Shilo" He purchased a replacement tag for the
amount of $5.00. I (Faye) told him the dogs record had been marked as "Moved Away" He stated to me that he had not
moved and has been separated/divorced from his wife and would like this license to be re-activated again in his name.
F. Valenzuela
C:\Proaram Files\Chameleon Software\Chameleon\Crvstal\Person.mt

EXHIBIT 3
16 of 19

EXHIBIT 3
17 of 19

EXHIBIT 3
18 of 19

EXHIBIT 3
19 of 19

EXHIBIT 4
1 of 7

EXHIBIT 4
2 of 7

EXHIBIT 4
3 of 7

EXHIBIT 4
4 of 7

EXHIBIT 4
5 of 7

EXHIBIT 4
6 of 7

EXHIBIT 4
7 of 7

EXHIBIT 5
1 of 4

EXHIBIT 5
2 of 4

EXHIBIT 5
3 of 4

EXHIBIT 5
4 of 4

EXHIBIT 6
1 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
2 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
3 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
4 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
5 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
6 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
7 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
8 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
9 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
10 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
11 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
12 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
13 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
14 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
15 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
16 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
17 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
18 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
19 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
20 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
21 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
22 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
23 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
24 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
25 of 26

EXHIBIT 6
26 of 26

EXHIBIT 7
1 of 7

EXHIBIT 7
2 of 7

EXHIBIT 7
3 of 7

EXHIBIT 7
4 of 7

EXHIBIT 7
5 of 7

EXHIBIT 7
6 of 7

EXHIBIT 7
7 of 7

EXHIBIT 8
1 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
2 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
3 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
4 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
5 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
6 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
7 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
8 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
9 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
10 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
11 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
12 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
13 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
14 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
15 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
16 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
17 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
18 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
19 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
20 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
21 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
22 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
23 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
24 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
25 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
26 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
27 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
28 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
29 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
30 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
31 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
32 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
33 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
34 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
35 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
36 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
37 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
38 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
39 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
40 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
41 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
42 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
43 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
44 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
45 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
46 of 52

EXHIBIT 8
47 of 52
01/26/2010
13:29
PINAL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
LAW Incident Table: Page;
259
Incident Number: 091202091
Natura, TRAFFIC OFFENSE Case !iumber: 091201072 tIllage:
10360 W PASADENA OR Area: C16
City: CASh GRANDE St: AZ Zip: Contact: A GOODE
Complainant& 3131295
Lst: 1457 GOODE Fst: ANDREW Mid,
DOB: /! SSN: Adr: peso
Rae: Sx; Tel: ( Cty: FLORENCE St: liZ Zip: 85232
Reported: 5499

Narrative 1 (See below)
Supplement:
Observed: 5405
CAD Call rD: CS774S4
15,01,01 12/02/2009 98
CLR CLEARED BY ARREST
S Disp Date: 12/02/2009
Agency: PCSO
Last RadLog:
Clear,mce,
Disposition,
Judicial Sts;
Misc Entry:
5405
LT13
1\ GOODE
A GOODE
N ESTRADA
o OFFICER REPORT
14,54,33 12/02/2009
14:25:38 12/02/2009
14:54:33 12/02/2009
Offense Codes:
Circumstances:
Rspndg Officers;
Rspnsbl Officer,
Received By:
HOW Received:
When Repor<ted:
Occurrd between:

INVOLVEMEN'1"S:
Type Record #
091201072
NM 000044907
NM 3131295
CT 493560
VR 136792
CA C577494
DS 40986
OS 40694
Date
12/01/2009
/ /
/ /
12/02/2009
/ /
12/02/2009
01/11/2010
12/17/2009
Description
THEFT
DIXON, MARK EDWARD
1457 GOOOE, ANDREW
DRIVE W/LIC SUSPENDED FTA/FTP
WHI 2002 FORD FIS0
14,54 12/02/2009 TRAFFIC OFFEN
DET. ANDREW GOODE #1457
CAO
Relationship
CONNECTED CASE
SUSPECT/CITED
-Complainant
CIT!M. nIXON
VEHICLE
*Illitiating Call
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
Lsw Incident Case Numbers,
Case Numben.
Seq Number
1 091201072
LAW Incident Offenses
Offense Codes
Seq Code
1 5405 DRIVING SUSP/REVOKED DRIV LIC
Amount
0.00
Oissetninatlon '$ restficted to criminat
Ju.sttGe AgOOO$$ atlt1
ONLY Secf>ndnr'j
to'unau\tlO(iled fi9J;;.iOCICS is PROHI8IT_v.
PlNALCOUNTYSBERIFFSCPT.OATE 1-;;..10 ! 0
Cq l:a-Oa-oq I

EXHIBIT 8
48 of 52
HIGHWAY/ROAD/ALLEY
LAW Incident. C.l;r;cumstances;
ContxihuUng Circumst"u';es
Comme.nts
WOODRUFF/MANCHESTER
Seq Code
1 LT13
LAW Incident Responders Detail
Responding Officers
Name Unit
1 A GOODE 1457
Main Radio Log Tahle:
Time/Date
15:09:01 12/02/2009
14:55:04 12/02/2009 1
Unit
1457
1457
Code Zone
98 ClS
ARRVO C1a
Aguc Description
peso DCS AND 8 dis
PCSO incid#m091202091 Traffic StOP

EXHIBIT 8
49 of 52
Narrat,ive:
PINALCOUNTY SHERI FF 'S OFFICE
INCIDENT REPORT
DR II: 091202091
BY: Detective A. Goode 111457
APPROVED BY: Sgt. P. LeBlanc #466
INCIDENT TYPE, Driving while Suspended
CASE TYPE: Drive with license suspe.nded for FTA/r"l'P
ATTACHMENTS: Arizona Traffic Ticket and Complaint 493560
EVIDENCE LIST: None
!l.'\JZR.. "'TIVE: On 12/02/09, I was assigned as a Detective to the Pinal County
Sheriff's Office (peSO), Criminal Investigations Bureau (CIS) Property Crimes
Division. On this day 1 was driving my agency assigned unmarked vehicle #23314
which is equipped with emergency lights and siren and I was dressed in plain
clothes with a metal Pinal County Sheriff's Office badge affixed to my belt
beside my d.uty we.apon_ As part of Detective Sergeant LeBlanc'S inve-stigati,ou,
Departme.ntal Report #091201072, r was conducting am:veil1a:nce in the area, of
N01.-th Bel Air Road and West Pa.sadena Drive in Casa Grande (Final County)}
Arizona. Sergeant LeBlanc and Detective Pile were on their way to meet me aft.er
I discovered the suspect under investigation may be in the residence allowing us
to conduct a and talk, instead of a search warrant.
At approximately 1423 hours, I observed a white male exit the residence located
at 10380 W. Pasadena Drive, Casa Grande, Arizona. The male paused before
getting into a white Ford pick-up truck, bearing Arizona license plate 794RDII.
I phoned Sergeant LeBlanc and advised 1 would be following the vehicle from the
residence. Sergeant LeBlanc advised they on their way from the area of
McCartney Road. The truck headed north on Sel Air Road to the stop sign at
woodruff Road. I followed. The vehicle came to a complete stop AAnd then turned
east (right) on Woodruff Road, fail'ing to signal his turn. r advised peso
Dispatch of my traffic stop and activated my emergency light-ing, giving two
short bursts of my siren. The vehicle yielded to the south gravel shoulder of
Woodruff Road, west of Manchester Road. I exited my vehicle and approached the
driver's side of the Ford making contact with the driver.
I introduced myself to the driver and requested his driver's license,
registration and insurance. Lying in the passenger seat was a brown &
white dog, possibly the Collie as reported stolen in Sergeant case.
The driver asked me why he was being stopped and stated to me, "I suppose your
st-opping me about my ex .. wife and the dog". I advised him he was stopped for
tailing to signal his turn from the stop sign at Bell\ir Road. The driver said
was just on my way to see you guygN. ! asked if he was planning on turning
dog over Co Ull and he said "no". The white male pl:ovided me with an Arizona
Drivers License B14794295, identifying himself as Mark Edward Dixon (DOa,
11/12/64l. Mark asked it he could get out of the vehicle and 1 asked him to
remain seated in the vehicle. Mark could provide me registration or

EXHIBIT 8
50 of 52
1.

2.

3.
insurance paperwork.
I return.ed t.o my vehicle to run a wants and warrancs search on Ma.x-k and his
vehicle. On the return I was advised hy peso Dispatch Mark's driving privileges
has been suspended. I phoned Sergeant LeBlanc to let him know my location and
information. I reque9ted a. driving history on Ma"rk and was advised driver'S
license was suspended (X3) for failure to appear hy the Casa Gr<lnde City CO\lrt
on 11/03/09 ,md he was mai.led the sus.pension on the S<lme date.
At approximately 1429 hours, Sergeant LeBlallC and Detective Pile arrived
on my traffic stop. Sergeant LeBlanc spoke to Mark whUe he was still seated in
the vehicle. Mark was advised by Sergeant LeBlanc to drive his vehicle back to
his residence and ",'e would follow him there. We arr!VflO h",ck at the residence
and sergeant LeBlanc continued his investigation. Mark advised he had taken
care of the issues with the court and there must be some kind ot mistake causing
his license to be Mark could not provide any documentation to
support his claim. I asked Mark if he received the notification from the court
and he said it is probably in his unopened mail in the house. I served Mark
with an Arizona Traffic Ticket and Complaint #493560 for Arizona Revised Statute
28-3473.C, DriVing while Suspended for Failure to Appear (FTA) / Failure to Pay
(FTP) .
Mark signed the citation, ,,,'as provided with a copy and was the.D released with a
verbal warning for the turn signall registra-tion and insurance violar.ions.
Hark'S vehicle which was now parked in his driveway was turned over to his son.
effecting the immobilization per ARS, 28-3511. Mark was advised if he were to
drive the vehicle again before reinstat'i?ment of hi-a license it "ould be
impounded for 30 days. Mark'S driver's license was later secured in the MVD
Destruction box at the peso San Tan Substation.
For further related case information, see Sergeant LeBlano's Case Report
091201072 .
rnere is nothing further to report at this time.
CASE STATUS, Closed

EXHIBIT 8
51 of 52
3.

4.

5.

6.

7.
Anwna lOUnc 1leJ<el anu UlmpillW<
__ i
must appear at: -,.= 1
at the date and time indicated

avnt
-- ------------------_ .. _--
----I
ORIGINAl COMPLAINT

EXHIBIT 8
52 of 52
Invoice Number Account Number Date Due Page
0823775382 963292042-00001 01/05/10 11 of 58
Detail for Dixon Mark: 520-705-2945
Voice, continued
Airtime Long Dist/
Date Time Number Rate Usage Type Origination Destination Min. Charges Other Chgs Total
11/17 8:47A 602-712-1515 Peak PlanAllow Casa Grand AZ Phoenix AZ 1 -- -- --
11/17 8:49A 602-542-1525 Peak PlanAllow Casa Grand AZ Phoenix AZ 3 -- -- --
11/17 8:52A 602-542-1525 Peak PlanAllow Sacaton AZ Phoenix AZ 3 -- -- --
11/17 9:04A 602-332-2053 Peak M2MAllow Sacaton AZ Phoenix AZ 1 -- -- --
11/17 10:01A 602-881-0696 Peak M2MAllow Sacaton AZ Gilbert AZ 1 -- -- --
11/17 10:02A 480-283-3740 Peak M2MAllow,CallWait Sacaton AZ Incoming CL 20 -- -- --
11/17 10:22A 000-000-0086 Peak PlanAllow,CallVM Sacaton AZ Voice Mail CL 1 -- -- --
11/17 10:33A 520-483-9697 Peak M2MAllow Casa Grand AZ Casagrande AZ 9 -- -- --
11/17 11:14A 480-283-3740 Peak M2MAllow Casa Grand AZ Tempe AZ 2 -- -- --
11/17 11:21A 480-330-5225 Peak M2MAllow Casa Grand AZ Mesa AZ 5 -- -- --
11/17 12:07P 480-283-3740 Peak M2MAllow Casa Grand AZ Tempe AZ 1 -- -- --
11/17 12:08P 520-483-9697 Peak M2MAllow Casa Grand AZ Casagrande AZ 6 -- -- --
11/17 12:13P 602-577-5286 Peak M2MAllow,CallWait Sacaton AZ Incoming CL 3 -- -- --
11/17 12:15P 520-866-7417 Peak PlanAllow,CallWait Sacaton AZ Incoming CL 3 -- -- --
11/17 12:20P 480-292-0255 Peak M2MAllow,CallWait Casa Grand AZ Incoming CL 11 -- -- --
11/17 12:38P 520-483-9697 Peak M2MAllow Sacaton AZ Casagrande AZ 4 -- -- --
11/17 1:14P 480-283-3740 Peak M2MAllow Sacaton AZ Tempe AZ 1 -- -- --
11/17 1:34P 602-881-0696 Peak M2MAllow Casa Grand AZ Incoming CL 1 -- -- --
11/17 2:03P 480-505-3332 Peak PlanAllow Sacaton AZ Incoming CL 9 -- -- --
11/17 2:12P 480-320-2262 Peak PlanAllow Casa Grand AZ Incoming CL 6 -- -- --
11/17 2:46P 520-709-3098 Peak M2MAllow,CallWait Sacaton AZ Incoming CL 1 -- -- --
11/17 3:34P 602-332-2053 Peak M2MAllow Sacaton AZ Phoenix AZ 4 -- -- --
11/17 4:39P 480-283-3740 Peak M2MAllow Sacaton AZ Incoming CL 2 -- -- --
11/17 4:40P Unavailable Peak PlanAllow,CallWait Sacaton AZ Incoming CL 2 -- -- --
11/17 5:18P 520-709-3098 Peak M2MAllow Sacaton AZ Incoming CL 1 -- -- --
11/18 4:59A 520-483-9697 Off-Peak M2MAllow Sacaton AZ Casagrande AZ 2 -- -- --
11/18 5:26A 520-483-9697 Off-Peak M2MAllow Casa Grand AZ Casagrande AZ 2 -- -- --
11/18 6:21A 602-332-2053 Peak M2MAllow Sacaton AZ Incoming CL 4 -- -- --
11/18 7:18A 520-251-1449 Peak PlanAllow Sacaton AZ Casagrande AZ 7 -- -- --
11/18 7:30A 520-251-1449 Peak PlanAllow Casa Grand AZ Incoming CL 15 -- -- --
Cpl. Stephen Clark
office phone number

Babeu Complaint On Corruption in Pinal County Sheriff Office

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Babeu Complaint On Corruption in Pinal County Sheriff Office

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mark Dixon

P.O. Box 12695

You might also like