se maven 688 6:12-6v-01532 Docu tI OUPRAR Pade 1 of 2 PagelD #: 39 ‘ogiS i pllenner saat sadth informe conan hescn ote repace aor spplerent he fling nd service of pleings oc thes papas as eid aw, excep roid {BLREL GE of saa Te fom, proved by Jul Contren ot tnd Snes September 1 aque sh asco be aak of aas ete pane ae leclll docket see GES ASTREC HONG GY NEAT TAGEOF THSFORA) 1 @) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS Kane Marceaux. Greg Cormier, Scot Poienco, Garie Thompson, LafoyeteCiy-Parich Concoldated Government Nowbert Myers, Novey Stell, Uetom P. Hens, Rogina Briscoe, Lafayete Potce Deparimen, Lester Josep Joey” Dre and Aleeta Me Hating ‘Dee Edvard Stanley, James P. Graf and George “ack” () County of Residence of First Listed Phinstt Lafayette ‘County of Resideace of First Listed Defendant ie eiceProris planinre GaSe) fs moan casts Bi or ‘RERRETEPERSHRS ES room (©) Astcneys re any, rar ond Taper te) ‘Alton om) J. Christopher Alexander, Sr., Esq., 3751 Government St, Ste. A TL BASIS OF JURISDICTION (ise on rom 075) JIM, CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL, PARTIES ime nov bafe Pump (aD Coe Cry) ‘ond On Bat for Dafa) 91 US.Gonnmen 203 deal Qetn Me Dee FIP DEF Pais (iS Gaerne Neve Pas) Giimemmisee OGM teomttertiime 'S'« Bit 82 US Gerenet 94 Biviy Chin ofAnte Sue 2 2 Impl and inp ass 9 5 OS ‘tos ca Cini of Pars He tb ‘sists Ao St Chierorsnjenefs 23. Ponige Nan n6 96 IV. NATURE OF SUIT (wor mom bacon Seamer AS A ee] 9 io mae TENGONALINIURY —FERSONALINIURY [> Dre haiSeam fo coAmalsUEH |OsETNe 3 tsar fo Soninane 0 Usrounligey | ewenasescw: [a cide 8 ose Ropeeemat 5 lina aa Eis Aafs rae Saumtsty fo nsue mies 8 dip aut 3 leone en a 2 vrei 3 phat akin 0 150 Recovery of Overpayment [0 320 Assoat, Libel & Parmaceaical 1D 480 Commence inca eageel Seca res ey aeons 2 So brptin 9 ist inde Josoreet ener Rasen iy Bronce 5 forasece ate 8 esha oes Taam 2 vie Sastre S San cong Ones Sound J sone Seno 0 socom na Ge verm (SH Caw" | peeespsoeecete 55 Socaess o tsiteensyOreaman | Eee HeasOval homers |S 7h Eeoa 5 fsa stented” lo ssonnrve nena * 3 tno fra) ew O iaialaldasis JO ssshawrveice 5 ri emintng [0 notion eo |S saps Oe asay [oodles acim 8 spose Cone Foie lattiy Homer” |S Rokaimaanrae™ Jaansonrac = (0 rose Sans 8 scone tittiy [os00 Santos serutime |Sntemiadsioica —[aasamees 5 tf tae 5 iseacae ee 0 sasiepry ame [0 oa 2 ts ace ron rset robe unity [a nd dortiadse is hat Bene en 2 2 An eee oe sea [SEEDERS 0s Ansa rsne Hit couemats — faTOO Gs Corer ‘Soro patel 9 zt anone ast ace a ostate Scop eae Sitter etiam [2 etmet Iden Cops Josmiits anita, | ssochatatfoe 5 atone tat Basie > Hoes Suse ‘Sats 8 stent sty Acomaities [9 Soncttey — SEEIRRERTORT SBoMoksrtaltaey frashecrwobbine. [3 Soca’ ob Ecpiomee [9 Sochtgae |G aa meer cape J aisnecrosins [5 Ssrtrocntina |?“ nen te ome 3 Socetecee omc on > ais son Scaaeel [oes arborsamn Vs ORIGIN. (racy -t- mone On ae 1 Gopal | 92 Revevelliom 3 Remsndadtom 4 Rainwater Js Tamslined fom oy sguiit Peking © ? Eames Applic ar Eepacd Nigel [ie tie S.C Sa under wash you me ing. Denes clean oie any [42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1986, and the First, Four, Fith are Fourteenth Amendments te the Urited Statee Conetiuion [BriePcesarpcon of eee [Cte for money damges/hjuncve rele e: Lafayete POs “code of sence & abragement of police ofcors Conaltaoal ghis VI. CAUSE OF ACTION Vil. REQUESTEDIN — O clmck IF THIS Is A CLASSACTION DEMANDS ‘CHECK YES oaly i demanded in compa: COMPLAINT: UNDERF.RCP.23 JURY DEMAND: Yer ONo VIII. RELATED CASE(S) IF ANY Geri yp DOCKET NUMBER Bae ‘SERRTUNE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD une §,2012 /s/ John Christopher Alexander, Sr., Esq, (La. Bar Roll No. 26,591) OFTCE TSE ORD RecEPTS anount Amv. sunge as. UDGCase 6:12-cv-01532 Document 1-1 Filed 06/05/12 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #: 40 8 tovens (er 00) INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44 Authotity For Civil Cover Sheet ‘The IS 44 civil cover sheet nd to information contained herein nether replaces nor supplements te filings and service of pleading or ether papers a required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in Septomler 1974, oquired for the use of the Clerk of Court forthe purpose of initating the evil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover shea is subaited tothe Clerk of Court or ach eval ‘complaint filed, The attomey fling case should compete the form as fallow 1 an CEtaitife Defendants, Eater names (last, first midde nia) of plenitfand defendant. the plaintffor defendants government agency, we only {he fullname orstandad abbreviations, Ifthe plain or defendant isan official withina government agency iden Tit the agency and hen teoffical,evis both name and tite. 8) County of Residence. For each civil ease fled, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name ofthe county where the first iste plant resides at the time of ling. fa US. plaintiff cases, enter th name ofthe county in which the frst ist defendant resides atthe ime ofiling. (NOTE: In and condensation ceases, the eounty of residence of the “defendant isthe focsion of the tact of land involved.) {6)Attomeys, Ener the firm name, adres, telephone number, and attorney ofrevord. I there sre several stomeys, list hem on a attachment, noting in his section “see attachment" IL ,lurisdiction. The basis of jrisdiction ist forth under Rule (a), FCP, which requires that jurisdictions be showa in pleadings. Plce un “X" in one ofthe boxes. If theres more than one basis of juradietion, precedence is given inthe order shown below ‘United States plain. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U'S.C. 1345 and 1348, Suits by agencies and officers ofthe United States are inchuded her. ‘United States defindant. (2) When the plsini is suing tho United States its officers or agencies, place an “Xin this box Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment io the Constiution, an act of Congres oa treaty ofthe United States. In cases where the US. is a pany the US. plain or defendant code takes prevalence an box Tor? shouldbe marked. iversity of citizenship. (4) Tis refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where partic are citizens of diffrent tase. When Box 4 is checked, the ctzenship of te diferent parties must be checked. (See Section II bolow federal question actions take prosedcnor ove: diversity cases) Ui. _, Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. Thissection of the 18 44s tobe completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above, Mark this section foreach principal party IV. jg Nutr of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If the nature of suit cannot bo determined, be sue the cause of ation, in Section VI below, ‘sufficient t enable th deputy clerk or the statistical clerks inthe Administative Office to determine the nature of si. Ie eause ie mors then ave maton Gf ‘ut, select the most definitive, Vs Origin. Place 2a “Xin one ofthe seven boxes, Original Proceedings. (1) Cases which originate in the Us Removodffom Sate Court. (2) Proceedings iiated in ate courte may be retmoved tothe district cours under Title 28 U.S.C, Section M44. When the petition for removal is granted, check this box. ‘Remandod from Appellate Cou. (2) Check this box for cases remanded fo the district court for futher action. Use tho date of remand asthe fing dat, Reinsated or Reopened. (4) Check this box for eases reinstated or reopened in he district court. Use the ropening date asthe fing date, ‘Tranafered from Another District (5) For cases transferred under Tile 28 U.S.C, Section 1404(a)- Do not use this for within istrict transfers or maliistrct litigation transfers. Maltiisrct Litigation. (6) Check this box when a mulidistrct case is transferred into the district under authority of Tile 28 U.S.C, Section 1407, Whee this ‘box is checked, donot cheek (5) above. Appeal to Disc Judge fom Magisle Judgment. (7) Check this bax for an appel fom a magistrate judge's dacison, VE___ Catseot ction. Report the civ status directly related tthe cause of sion and givea brief description ofthe caus. Do not ite jurisicttonal statutes ateshcdaiat ee Basi Sescnplo! Cosh reception ofeble sevice Vil, Requested in Complaint. Class Acton, Place an" in this box if you are fing a class ation ude Rue 23, BRLCP. Deaand. In his space enter the dlr amount (in thousands of dolar) beng demands or nda other demand sich a preliminary injunction, ‘ary Demand, Check the appropriate box to indicat whether or nota jury a being densanded VEIL “Related Cases. This section of the JS 44is used to reference related ponding cases if eny, If there are related pending cases insert the docket numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases. ate and Attorney Signature. Dato and sign the civil cover sheet. ited States district coutCase 6:12-cv-01532 Document 1 Filed 06/05/12 Page 1 of 38 PagelD #: 1 UNITED STATES District CouRT ‘WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION KANE MARCEAUX; GREG CormuER; Scorr | CiviL ACTION No. POIENCOT; NORBERT MYERS; GABE ‘THOMPSON; NOVEY STELLY; ULETOM P. | HeEwrrr; REGINA BRISCOE; AND, ALEETA M. HARDING Plaintiffs VERSUS LAFAYETTE CrTy-PARISH CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT; LAFAYETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT THROUGH THE LAFAYETTE Crry-Paris CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT; | LESTER JOSEPH "JOEY" DUREL, JR. IN HIS CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE LAFAYETTE ‘Ciry-PARisi CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT, DEE EDWARD STANLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER OF THE LAFAYETTE CITY-PARISH CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT; JAMES P. JiM” CRAFT, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS CHIEF OF THE LAFAYETTE, POLICE DEPARTMENT; AND, GEORGE “JACKIE” ALFRED, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS PATROL DIVISION COMMANDER (OF THE LAFAYETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT. | Defendants COMPLAINT 1. This is an action for money damages brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988, and the First, Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and under the laws of the State of Louisiana, against Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, Lafayette Police Department through the Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, Lester Joseph "Joey" Durel, Jr. in his capacity as President of the Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government, Dee Edward Stanley, individually and in his “te