Professional Documents
Culture Documents
doc
http://dc343.4shared.com/doc/sfmsz-Qy/preview.html
HRH Limited
Gas Analysis
Continuous Phase
In this situation the hydrocarbon exists in sufficient saturation to enable direct pore to pore continuity of the hydrocarbon column. This can occur where the hydrocarbon saturation is between 10% and 90% within the rock pore spaces. This is the only accumulation that is of commercial interest as this is the only situation where the hydrocarbon is free to flow towards production wellbores.
Residual Phase
In this case the oil or gas presence is as discrete droplets within the water-bearing pore space. These will usually stick to or even coat the rock matrix grains. Hydrocarbon of this type will not flow towards a wellbore. In reservoirs of this type only the water will be mobile. Such an accumulation would be characteristic of a hydrocarbon migration pathway between source and trap, or would also be characteristic of a reservoir from which production has already taken place.
Dissolved Hydrocarbons
At the molecular level it is widely accepted that formation waters contain significant quantities of hydrocarbons in solution. These are released from water produced by drilling or production and will tend to appear as free gas at the surface. However, this is unlikely to saturate the pore space of the reservoir in sufficient quantity to create commercially productive traps.
Version 2.0
6-1
1 of 10
2012-06-18 23:02
http://dc343.4shared.com/doc/sfmsz-Qy/preview.html
HRH Limited :
Gas Analysis
Insoluble kerogenaceous materials will tend to have associated free soluble hydrocarbons contained within the main organic mass. These can be released by drilling, but will not flow through the rock to enable production. Significant gas shows from highly kerogenaceous rocks can indicate the presence of a viable source rock.
Conc (% in Air)
4.8%
3%
2.2% 1.8% 1.4%
Table 6-1:
The various hydrocarbon gases released by the drilling fluid into the atmosphere will ignite in the presence of oxygen and sufficient heat at the concentrations indicated in table 6-1 above. These explosive concentrations are termed Lower Explosive Limits (LEL). It is essential that spark-producing activities at the wellsite are only performed when the total gas values are significantly below these levels. The most critical is that of methane, since this is the most commonly occurring gas at surface. Hence total gas is usually calibrated and quoted in the artificial assumption that it is comprised entirely of
Version 2.0
6-2
2 of 10
2012-06-18 23:02
http://dc343.4shared.com/doc/sfmsz-Qy/preview.html
HRH Limited methane. The control system employed at the wellsite is called the Permit to Work system, with all spark-producing activities classified as Hot Work.
Gas Analysis
One's first instinct may be to sum these to establish the associated value of total gas, i.e. C n = 2967 ppm
This value is called total carbon when used in the Total/ENI Gas While Drilling analysis (Kandel et al 2000, section 6.5.1, QC). When gas levels are measured using the flame ionisation detector (FID) it is known that the response is proportional to the mass flow-rate of carbon through the flame (section 1.3.1). Hydrocarbon molecules having more than one carbon atom will give a greater response than a single-carbon molecule of methane. A rule of thumb that may be applied is that the measured concentration of each alkane should be multiplied by the number of carbon atoms present in that molecule. These multiples can then be summed to give a rough total gas. Continuing the example above: 1 2 3 4 5 x C1 x C2 x C3 4 x iC 4 x nC 4 5 x iC 5 x nC 5 C corr = = = = = = = = (2 x 756) (3 x 456) (4 x 238) (4 x 221) (5 x 100) (5 x 98) = = = = = = 1098 ppm 1512 ppm 1368 ppm 952 ppm 884 ppm 500 ppm 492 ppm 5708 ppm
This parameter is called corrected total carbon in the Total/ENI Gas While Drilling analysis (Kandel et al 2000, section 6.5.1, QC).
Version 2.0
6-3
3 of 10
2012-06-18 23:02
http://dc343.4shared.com/doc/sfmsz-Qy/preview.html
HRH Limited
Gas Analysis
Where the difference between the summed chromatograph products and the measured total gas is significant, this could be due to the presence of contaminant hydrocarbons (for example from oil-based drilling fluids), or to a fault in the gas detection system. It must be remembered that this is a rule of thumb only. The precise relationship is more complex with consequent effects on the summed values.
Version 2.0
6-4
4 of 10
2012-06-18 23:02
http://dc343.4shared.com/doc/sfmsz-Qy/preview.html
HRH Limited
Gas Analysis
3 1
10 100
Fig 6-1:
Previously, gas ratio analysis enabled the user to define only non-productive or productive oil and gas, using logarithmic (Pixler 1969) or triangular ratio plots (discussed below). The triangular plots are produced from data gathered at a single depth, and so are unable to produce a continuous log. Pixler plots can be single depth, or can be incorporated into logs as
Version 2.0
6-5
5 of 10
2012-06-18 23:02
http://dc343.4shared.com/doc/sfmsz-Qy/preview.html
HRH Limited
Gas Analysis
depth based traces. Zones of interest can be further analysed using the older ratio plots if desired. Whittaker & Sellens and Pixler ratio plots are included in the attached example gas log. It should be noted that permeability of the formations will influence the amount of higher hydrocarbon gases that are released from cuttings into the mud stream. Tight rocks such as shales may retain a significant proportion of the larger molecules, thus affecting the results of the ratio equations. Interpretations of gas ratio data must be made only after referring to cuttings samples and drilling data to evaluate the associated rock type. .
x 100
Likely Hydrocarbon Type extremely light gas, poor productivity potential productive gas potentially productive oil residual oil, low productivity potential
Table 6-2:
and C
to C 3 , C 4 , and
As the hydrocarbon gravity increases from light gas to residual oil the balance ratio falls. W and B h have an inverse relationship and when plotted on the same scale, can further improve evaluation. Eventually the curves will cross. To resolve the resultant ambiguity, the hydrocarbon character ratio C h (section 6.2.3) was developed.
Version 2.0
6-6
6 of 10
2012-06-18 23:02
http://dc343.4shared.com/doc/sfmsz-Qy/preview.html
HRH Limited
Gas Analysis
Balance Ratio Likely Hydrocarbon Type B h > 100.0 light dry gas, unlikely to be productive 0.5 < W h < 17.5 W h < B h <100.0 productive gas 0.5 < W h < 17.5 Bh < W h productive gas condensate or high gravity, high GOR oil B h < W h productive oil 17.5 < W h < 40 17.5 < W h < 40 B h << W h nonproductive residual oil .Table
6-3:
h h
gas
C C
Table 6-4: Use of Character Ratio To Resolve Ambiguity in Zone C 6.3.4 Coal Gas Shows
A special case is illustrated in zone D of figure 6-1 above. This is the response of the Balance ratio to coal gas shows. In such a situation, the gas is rich in ethane (C 2 ) but propane and the other higher hydrocarbons are absent. Character ratio therefore has a value of zero, while balance approaches infinity.
/C 3 , C 3 /nC 4 and nC 4 /C 2 .
Version 2.0
6-7
7 of 10
2012-06-18 23:02
http://dc343.4shared.com/doc/sfmsz-Qy/preview.html
HRH Limited
Gas Analysis
Fig 6-2:
If each side of the triangle is taken to be length = 1, then these ratios can be found by C2 C3 nC 4 , , ( C 2 + C 3 ) ( C 3 + nC 4 ) ( C 2 + nC 4 ) This gives a value up to 1 for each ratio. Plot these points onto the sides of the triangle. The next step is to construct lines from each point to the opposite corner of the triangle (figure 6-3). The intersection of these lines defines the productivity of the show. If the intersection falls within the ellipsoid, the formation is likely to be productive. If it falls outside then the show is probably non-productive. An intersection falling near to the edges of the ellipsoid would indicate a marginal show. The ellipsoid shape is empirically derived from study of real wells.
Fig 6-3:
Productivity Potential
Version 2.0
6-8
8 of 10
2012-06-18 23:02
http://dc343.4shared.com/doc/sfmsz-Qy/preview.html
HRH Limited To discover whether the show represents oil or gas, consider the ratios C nC 4 /C tot , where C tot is the simple sum of all the alkanes present, i.e. C section 6.5.1, QC).
Gas Analysis
2 /C tot , C 3 /C tot and to C 5 . (total carbon,
Fig 6-4:
A triangular graph is now constructed such that each side reads from 0 to 0.17. This is superimposed onto the existing triangular plot (figure 6-4). Each of the above ratios is calculated and plotted onto the relevant side of the triangle using this scale. Should the ratio value exceed 0.17 simply extrapolate the scale beyond this value and plot as normal.
Fig 6-5:
Finally construct a line through each of these ratio points such that it parallels the side opposite to the C 2 , C 3 or nC 4 apex (figure 6-5). The three lines will form a triangle whose way up will indicate whether the C n /C tot ratios represent oil or gas.
Version 2.0
6-9
9 of 10
2012-06-18 23:02
http://dc343.4shared.com/doc/sfmsz-Qy/preview.html
HRH Limited
Gas Analysis
Pixler
These ratios are plotted onto the vertical axes of the plot (figure 6-6). Analysis of real well data has shown that these ratios can indicate whether a formation bears oil, gas or water and whether or not it is productive. The points corresponding to each ratio are then joined together to produce a slope, shown in figure 6-6 below as a red line. If this slope is positive, i.e. increases from left to right, the show is likely to be productive. Any negative slope, e.g. C 1 /C 4 < C 1 /C 3 , suggests that the formation is likely to be non-productive or water-bearing. Generally speaking, an extremely steep slope, e.g. C the gas zone, would suggest very tight formations.
1
/C 4 high in
On the left, the above show (section 6.3.1) represents productive gas condensate (?) from a reservoir that may be considered to be a little tight. The red line crossing the oil/gas zone boundary shows the hydrocarbon to be transitional between gas and oil. The example on the right is a non-productive water-bearing zone.
C 1 /C 1000
2
C 1 /C 3
C 1 /C
C 1 /C 5 1000
C 1 /C
C 1 /C
C 1 /C
C 1 /C 5
Non-Productive Gas
Non-Productive Gas
100
100
65.0
Gas
Gas
15.0
10 10
Oil
Oil
2.0
Non-Productive Oil
1 1
Non-Productive Oil
Fig 6-6:
These conclusions were confirmed by later production tests. On the example log (and figure 6-7 below), the Pixler ratios are plotted against depth. The geologist should look for the presence of each ratio on the plot. Above the C 1 /C 2 shading is at the left of the column and is transparent. The difference between C 1 /C 2 and C 1 /C 3 is shaded as yellow, C 1 /C 3 and C 1 /C 4 difference is shaded green, and C 1 /C 4 to C 1 /C 5 difference is shaded blue.
Version 2.0
6-10
10 of 10
2012-06-18 23:02