1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

BETTY BRYAN, CATHERINE BRYAN 3745 Adams Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 PLAINTIFFS IN PRO SE 760-458-3977

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BETTY BRYAN, CATHERINE BRYAN and KOPOPELLI COMMUNITY WORKSHOP CORPORATION, Plaintiffs,

10 v. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 MTGLQ INVESTORS, LP, AS A COMPANY OWNED BY, GOLDMAN SACHS BANK, LITTON LOAN SERVICE, AS A COMPANY OWNED BY GOLDMAN SACHS BANK, GOLDMAN SACHS BANK AS ACTING TRUSTEE ON BEHALF OF THE HOLDERS OF THE GSAMP TRUST 2006-HE3 MORTGAGE PASS THRU CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-HE3, DEMARCO FLETCHER, IN HIS CAPACITY AS BROKER AND SALES AGENT FOR GOLDMAN SACHS BANK , BILL KOCH IN HIS CAPACITY AS AGENT FOR SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC. F/K/A FAIRBANKS CAPITAL CORP. STEPHEN C WICHMANN IN HIS CAPACITY AS AGENT FOR GOLDMAN SACHS BANK D/B/A MTGLQ INVESTORS, LP, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. F/K/A FAIRBANKS CAPITAL CORPORATION, RICK ARDISSONI. AND DOES individuals 1 to 100, inclusive; and all other persons and entities unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the real property described in the complaint adverse to Plaintiffs ownership, or any cloud upon Plaintiffs = title thereto, does 1

) Case No: 3:10-CV-01605-CAB-KSC ) ) DECLARATION OF CATHERINE ) BRYAN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS ) REPLY TO DEFENDANTS MTGLQ ) AND LITTONS OPPOSITION TO ) ) PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION TO ) STRIKE A FALSE AND FORGED RIGHT ) TO CANCEL DOCUMENT ) ) ) NO ORAL ARGUMENTS ) REQUESTED ) ) Hearing: ) Time: ) ) Judge: Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

| DECLARATION OF CATHERINE BRYAN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANTS MTGLQ AND LITTONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION TO STRIKE A FALSE AND FORGED RIGHT TO CANCEL DOCUMENT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 4. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 6. 5. 3. 2. 1.

Defendants.

DECLARATION OF CATHERINE BRYAN

I, Catherine Bryan, plaintiff in the above-captioned civil case herein declare all that following statements are true and correct and made according to my personal knowledge. My mother Plaintiff Betty Bryan and I, Catherine Bryan lawfully held the subject property at issue located at 3745 Adams Street in Carlsbad California in joint tenancy until we conveyed the subject property to Kokopelli Workshop Corporation in exchange for full TENDER of our mortgage loan debt and lifetime residency on the subject property on March 23, 2009. (see herein attached exhibits I-III) On the date of November 8, 2005 I attended a document signing of borrower Betty Bryans mortgage loan contact and signed multiple loan documents as co-owner of located at 3745 Adams Street in Carlsbad California. On the date of November 8, 2005 I was not provided an unsigned copy of the alleged RIGHT TO CANCEL document, nor did I sign such a document. I have inspected the document submitted electronically on June 8, 2012; by Defendants MTGLQ L.Q. Investors L.P. and Litton Loan Service (hereinafter Opposing Defendants) entitled; RIGHT TO CANCEL (see document 163-2, (EXHIBIT 3, page two of two) and determined that someone has forged my name on the alleged RIGHT TO CANCEL . Between the years of 2007 and 2009 Kokopelli Workshop Corporation applied for and was qualified to receive a number of grants that would have substantially benefited the subject property and enabled full TENDER of plaintiffs full outstanding mortgage debt. In April of 2009, two separate funding committees toured the subject property and favorably indicated that the subject property would entitled to a land development grant for $2,000,000 $16,000,000 during the period running from 2010-2013.
| DECLARATION OF CATHERINE BRYAN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANTS MTGLQ AND LITTONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION TO STRIKE A FALSE AND FORGED RIGHT TO CANCEL DOCUMENT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

7.

In November of 2009 financial director Andrea Million was notified that all Kokopelli Workshop Corporation 2009-2010 Application for 2011-2013 grant funding must be withdrawn subsequent to a preliminary title report and project examination revealing that MTGLQ Investors L.P. (not Kokopelli Workshop Corporation) was in legal possession of the headquarters property title.(see exhibit IV)

8.

On June 23, 2012 I drafted, printed and caused to be delivered by USPA mail, a FORMAL WRITTEN REQUEST for a personal meeting date for the purpose of negotiating out of court resolution of all outstanding discovery disputes with defendants Litton Loan Service and MTGLQ Investors L.P. by means of a letter addressed to Litton Loan Service and MTGLQ Investors L.P. care of their attorney of record: Sara Attorney Markert Loughran at HOUSER & ALLISON, APC 701 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 200, Carlsbad, California 92011, and as of the date of the drafting of this declaration, attorney Sara Attorney has yet to provide a date she is willing to meet and confer to resolve these issues. A true and valid copy of my above referenced letter dated June 23, 2012 has been attached as Exhibit VI to the supporting memorandum of points and authorities filed concurrently herewith.

9.

In this same letter of June 23, 2012, I therein requested to personally meet and confer regarding defendants failure to respond to Plaintiffs First Set of Interrogatories and paragraph #4 of my letter inquired as follows:
If defendants Litton Loan Service and MTGLQ Investors

L.P. and their counsel insists on maintaining their former position that formal discovery has commenced; then pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendants were served with Plaintiffs First Set of Interrogatories and it has been almost 45 days and no responses to date have been provided by either defendant so will counsel also agree that our meeting will also serve to meet and confer before Plaintiffs file a motion to compel answers to plaintiff First Set of Interrogatories served separately to Litton Loan Service and MTGLQ Investors L.P..?

These same requests were reiterated in several subsequent emails addressed to defendants attorney Sara Attorney Markert at; Sara L. Markert<smarkert@houser-law.com>; and
3
| DECLARATION OF CATHERINE BRYAN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANTS MTGLQ AND LITTONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION TO STRIKE A FALSE AND FORGED RIGHT TO CANCEL DOCUMENT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4 11. 10.

copies of these requests for a conference date were concurrently sent to all other parties in interest at; Joseph E. Floren; jfloren@morganlewis.com; Gwen Ribar<gribar@wrightlegal.net>; William Idleman <widleman@wrightlegal.net>; "jzak@wrightlegal.net" <jzak@wrightlegal.net>; "cathy.knecht@sbgk.com" <cathy.knecht@sbgk.com>; "Bronk, Michelle M." <mbronk@morganlewis.com>; "mary.do@sbgk.com" mary.do@sbgk.com

As of todays date, July 8, 2012, defendants attorney Sara Attorney Markert has sent several incomprehensible answers that seem to berate plaintiff for their failure meet and confer and concurrently completely fail provide a tentative date for a personal meeting to negotiate an out of Court resolution to ongoing discovery dispute issues . As near as I can tell Sara Attorney Markerts position is that if Plaintiff Betty Bryan cannot leave her sickbed and come to the offices of HOUSER & ALLISON, APC 701 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 200, Carlsbad, California 92011, to discuss these issues Attorney Markerts will not commit to a personal meeting with Plaintiff Catherine Bryan.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America, that all the foregoing information is true and correct. Executed on this day of July 9, 2012,

____________________________ Catherine Bryan, Plaintiff In Pro Se

| DECLARATION OF CATHERINE BRYAN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANTS MTGLQ AND LITTONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION TO STRIKE A FALSE AND FORGED RIGHT TO CANCEL DOCUMENT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 5
| DECLARATION OF CATHERINE BRYAN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANTS MTGLQ AND LITTONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION TO STRIKE A FALSE AND FORGED RIGHT TO CANCEL DOCUMENT

EXHIBIT I

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 6
| DECLARATION OF CATHERINE BRYAN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANTS MTGLQ AND LITTONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION TO STRIKE A FALSE AND FORGED RIGHT TO CANCEL DOCUMENT

EXHIBIT II

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 7
| DECLARATION OF CATHERINE BRYAN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANTS MTGLQ AND LITTONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION TO STRIKE A FALSE AND FORGED RIGHT TO CANCEL DOCUMENT

EXHIBIT III

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 8
| DECLARATION OF CATHERINE BRYAN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANTS MTGLQ AND LITTONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION TO STRIKE A FALSE AND FORGED RIGHT TO CANCEL DOCUMENT

EXHIBIT IV

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 9
| DECLARATION OF CATHERINE BRYAN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANTS MTGLQ AND LITTONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION TO STRIKE A FALSE AND FORGED RIGHT TO CANCEL DOCUMENT

CERTIFICATE OF FILING AND SERVICE I Catherine Bryan plaintiff in the above entitled action do hereby certify that on July 9, 2012, I filed an original signed copy of the above-and-foregoing pleading with to the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA and concurrently served a true and correct copy by mail to the following parties: Litton Loan Service and MTGLQ Investors L.P. c/o Sara L. Markert, Esq.at ATTORNEY SARA L. MARKERT, ESQ. HOUSER & ALLISON, APC 701 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 200, Carlsbad, California 92011 & Select Portfolio Servicing and Bill Koch c/o ; Wright, Finlay and Zak at 4665 MacArthur Court, Suite 280, Newport Beach California 92660. By: __________________________________ Catherine Bryan

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 10
| DECLARATION OF CATHERINE BRYAN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANTS MTGLQ AND LITTONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION TO STRIKE A FALSE AND FORGED RIGHT TO CANCEL DOCUMENT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 11
| DECLARATION OF CATHERINE BRYAN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANTS MTGLQ AND LITTONS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE MOTION TO STRIKE A FALSE AND FORGED RIGHT TO CANCEL DOCUMENT