Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The completed parking deck will serve the office building in the background.
Combating corrosion
The use of a fusion-bonded epoxy coating on rebars is considered by many engineers to be among the most effective techniques for combating corrosion though it has been in use for only a few years. Other approaches some used in conjunction with epoxy coating have met with varying degrees of success. These include membrane coverings of bridge decks and parking ramps, latex concrete overlays, corrosion inhibiting admixtures, polymer impregnation, use of galvanized rebars, cathodic protection of rebars, and the Iowa method of bonding a dense, low-slump concrete to the base. All these have the purpose of (1) keeping chloride-bearing water from seeping down through the concrete to the rebars or (2) preventing chloride-bearing water in the concrete from touching the reinforcing bars. Costs tend to vary widely. Those of such techniques as polymer impregnation and use of galvanized rebars fall on the high side. Use of epoxy-coated rebars is usually priced considerably lower. The rate of deterioration of a concrete deck due to corroding steel increases with time. As the rebars corrode, the iron oxide which forms causes an expansion in volume of up to 20 times that of the original volume of the portion of the bar that has corroded. The inevitable result is immense pressure between the bars and the surrounding concrete, which causes the all-too-familiar
Coated rebars are tied with plasticcoated wire to ensure stability during concrete placement.
The flexibility of the fusion-bonded epoxy coating must be sufficient to prevent cracks and breaks from occurring in the coating during fabrication bending.
cracking and spalling. The resulting disruption of the surface and the loss of large pieces of concrete, in turn, mean greater vulnerability to waterborne chlorides, which leads to more spalling. Two parking deck projects in the Minneapolis and St. Paul areaone involving new construction and the other repairoffer a dramatic contrast between the cost of p re venting rebar corrosion during new construction, and the cost of repair of an existing structure already damaged by corrosion.
on the upper deck and 140 in the lower section. A low-slump mix was used with a high cement content (588 pounds per cubic yard).2 Special care was taken in selecting the aggregate. The mix contained 6 to 8 percent air, and a retarder was used to delay set over steel beams to eliminate minor cracking. The concrete was placed by pump, enabling the crew on one occasion to install 12,500 square feet in a single day. After curing, a minimum of two coats of sealer was applied. Central to the design was the use of rebars with a fusion-bonded epoxy coating. The 6-inch-thick composite deck slab allowed use of 2 inches of concrete cover over both top and bottom bars, compared with the 3/4 inch of cover often used on earlier parking decks. According to the supplier of the coated rebars, the epoxy coating on projects of this type costs approximately $300 to $350 per ton over the cost of uncoated steel rebars. Number 4 bars were used in the Pa rk d a l e Plaza deck. Assuming a rebar weight of approximately
212 pounds per square foot and a concrete area of 51,360 square feet, the weight of rebars used in the deck could be calculated at a little over 64.2 tonsil For purposes of this example, if the cost of coated rebars were calculated at $860 per ton, and the cost of uncoated rebars at $540 per ton, then the cost differential for the epoxy coating would be about 40 cents per square foot or $20,544 for the entire deckapproximately 3.6 percent of the total cost. By contrast, Conservative estimates of replacement Costs range from $13 to $15 per square foot, which is many times the estimated cost of using the coated re-
bars initially. Various studies, moreover, have shown that use of the epoxy coating can greatly increase the effective lifespan of such structures.
Major spalling on the bottom of a ramp in a St. Paul parking facility that was later repaired.
Entire floors were removed and replaced with fusion-bonded epoxy-coated rebars and new concrete.
placement remains effective long into the future and that spatting does not again become a problem, the architect/engineer specified epoxy-coated rebars and extreme care was taken in the project to ensure that all standards pertaining to the concrete constructionthe mix, the aggregates, air entrainment and other factors were strictly adhered to.
Credits: Owner of Parkdale Plaza: MEPC Properties Inc., St. Louis Park, Minnesota Architects: Baker Associates Inc., Minneapolis Engineers: Clark Engineering, Minneapolis Contractors: Acton Construction Company, Hugo, Minnesota Coated rebar supplier: Simcote Inc., Newport, Minnesota Powdered epoxy supplier: 3M, St. Paul, Minnesota
tomobile-borne deicing salts and the ramps required periodic maintenance and repair during their first 16 years of life. Finally, a repair project that may well cost in excess of $100,000 was undertaken on the 7000-squarefoot structure. In all probability, similar work will have to be done on the larger structure. In this most recent repair-replacement project, half of the 7000-square-foot ramp was replaced, while the other half was repaired with an overlay, since it was originally constructed over the store and could not be removed without serious disruption of business. A major dilemma facing the owners of the parking facility involved repair versus replacement. Both prospects represented a major expense. To ensure that concrete re-
PUBLICATION #C800587
Copyright 1980, The Aberdeen Group All rights reserved