Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Facts: Δs were lost at sea, with no food or water. They ended up killing one of the crew members, and ate him
to survive. They were picked up and saved 4 days after this by another vessel. If they hadn't killed the boy, they
would not have survived, and the boy was very weak, he would have probably died too.
Holding: This is murder unless it can be justified. Court says that killing out of necessity (self-defense) of
another person to save your own life only is justified when the victim was threatening the Δs life, not if the
victim is innocent. But Court also talks about extreme necessity, and discusses whether it can be justified. But
there is no absolute or unqualified necessity to preserve one's life.
o Can't take innocent life to save 3. rejects the utilitarian view of giving one life to save others. More
retributive - it's just wrong, you can't murder.
o In hindsight, what they did saved lives. Court rejects looking at it in hindsight. Look at it from the time
they made the decision to kill. A rescue boat could have come much sooner, and all 4 would have
survived. Must look at it from perspective of time they made that decision. The lesser evil at the time
was to leave all 4 alive.
o Court ultimately says - we don’t care. From retributivist perspective, just wrong to take an innocent life.
o Distinction of this case with case of mountaineer cutting rope of the other that lost his grip
• Imminent - harm to Δ / inevitable death of victim
• Choice of victim - if they had pulled straws it would be more sympathetic because there was
equal risk; all consented
• Cause of death (gravity vs. death)
Notes:
o United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Coop (2001) - case about using medical marijuana, where
CA law permitted it, but federal law prohibited. Federal law preempts, but Δ tries to use the necessity
defense. Court concludes that in passing the statute, Congress clearly did not consider marijuana a drug
that has medical benefits, and so is worthy of an exception to the criminal offense.