Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction New technologies which may be of particular interest in the Brazilian Pulp & Paper Industry
Customized discharge electrodes to reduce outlet emissions High frequency SMPS to replace conventional T/R sets New techniques for better gas distribution Top-rapped ESP design advantages compared to European design ESP Conversion Tumbling Hammer to Toprapped design a case study
Customized RDEs Increase Electrical Sectionalization Increase Rapping Sectionalization Enhance ESP Flow Distribution by Modeling Enhance Hopper & Anti-Sneakage Baffling Advanced SMPS Power Supplies Convert Tumbling Hammer to Top-Rapped design
Your logo
Rapping System
Design Objectives:
To Clean Collecting and Discharge Electrodes Minimize Re-entrainment, Stack Puffs, and Back Corona
Maintenance Needs:
Reliability, Low Maintenance, and Serviceability
Types:
Electromagnetic, Hammer, and Vibrators
SMPS
80 60 40 20
ESP
Current [mA]
Conventional T/R
0
[ms]
Time (ms)
SMPS INSTALLATIONS
Results and Benefits More power into ESP Lower emissions Less line power consumed
Tumbling Hammer
Four point suspension Tumbling hammers Rappers in gas stream Variable rapping frequency Fixed rapping intensity Large (2 m 5.5 m) fields 1.5 m 5.5 m between-field space required Insulator Compartments Panel plate assembly DEs subject to breakage & tension loss
Multiple CE plates per rapper Typical CE rapping ratio < 138 m2 per rapper Customizable DE emitter points Straightforward assy of DE Bottom frame simplifies alignment More shop fabrication lower field erection cost
One CE plate per rapper Rapping ratio could be higher w/long field Limited customization possible Frame assembly is fieldlabor intensive No bottom frame Overall field erection is labor intensive
TOP RAPPED Typically smaller ESP for a given gas flow Greater cost effective electrical sectionalization available Minimal internal maintenance Routine maintenance can be performed on line Typically better performance for a given SCA (f value) Typically more cost-effective for a given gas volume
Tumbling Hammer
Typically larger ESP for a given gas flow Minimal sectionalization; larger TR sets Internals are maintenance intensive Most routine maintenance performed off line Typically Inferior performance for a given SCA Typically less cost-effective for a given gas volume
SHORT TIME
a Case History
This shows that the unit was originally a tumbling hammer design
Day 8 Lowering the pre-assembled ring/roof girder onto the prepared flange
Contact Information
Charles Hayes Regional Sales Director SOUTHERNenvironmental,INC. 6690 West Nine Mile Road Pensacola, Florida 32526 850-941-3001 chayes@sei-group.com Renato Greco New Technologies Development Manager ENFIL Renato.greco@enfil.com