You are on page 1of 8

Cercetri Experimentale & Medico-Chirurgicale Anul XIII l Nr.3-4/2006 l Pag.

177-184

Cercetari
e x p e r i m e n ta le & m edico-chirurgicale

PELVIC INFLAMATORY DISEASE WITH ASCITES, INVASION OF THE LAST ILEAL ANSA AND PELVIC WALL, SECONDARY HYDRONEFROSIS - CASE REPORT S. Chiriac1, Eugenia Turescu2, D. Claici3, M. Avramovic1, Daniela Chiriac2, C.Ctu2, C. Andrei1, T. Cojocaru1, Maria Cornianu4
Summary: Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is a nonspecific term that refers to inflammation caused by infection in the upper genital tract 1. It may include the following structures: endometrium (endometritis), oviducts (salpingitis), uterine serosa and broad ligaments (parametritis) and pelvic peritoneum (peritonitis). We present a 20-year-old female patient that has a low life standard and she does not respect the doctors recommendations after birth, addressing the hospital only in the conditions of intense abdominal pain, linked to a significant trauma she has ascites, hydronefrosis, right-sided latero-uterine mixt inhomogenous mass, 10cm diameter, very sensitive at palpation, distended ureter 20mm invasion of the last ileal ansa. The clinic and paraclinic exams lead towards a probability diagnosis. The laparotomy and the laborious surgical procedure do not certificate the diagnosis and prognosis, until the hystopathological exam results arrive, which are in correlation with the evolution of the patient. The fact that PID is basically a medical problem, but may have profound surgical implications8, checks out. We consider having dealt with a particular case of PID, rarely described in medical literature, a case that is challenging therapeutically and scientifically for the physician. Keywords: pelvic inflammatory disease, ascites, hydronefrosis, case report

Received for publication: 03.01.2006 Revised: 15.04.2006

1 - Surgery - Politraumatology Casa Austria - Emergency Clinic County Hospital Timioara 2 - 1st Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology - Dr. D. Popescu Hospital Timioara 3 - Urology Clinic - Emergency Clinic County Hospital Timioara 4 - Anatomo - Pathology Laboratory - Emergency Clinic County Hospital Timioara

Introduction
Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is a nonspecific term that refers to inflammation caused by infection in the upper genital tract 1. It may include the following structures: endometrium (endometritis), oviducts (salpingitis), uterine serosa and broad ligaments (parametritis) and pelvic peritoneum (peritonitis) 1, 2. The process results from ascending infection from vagina and cervix 3 in more than 99% of the cases 1, 4, by lymphatic dissemination (postpartum, postabortum and some device related infection) results extraperitoneal

parametrical cellulites5 and, rarely, hematogenous routes (i.e. genital tuberculosis)5. The organisms may be bacteria, viruses, fungus, or parasites5. More frequent are bacteria: Neisseria gonorhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Escherichia coli1, 3, 4, 5, 6; streptococci and staphylococci are the most common organisms that produce pyogenic PID7. The pyogenic varieties of PID tend to spread via the lymphatics and veins, leading to lymphangitis, phlebitis, and cellulites. The pyogenic organisms are more viable than gonococcus and are usually recoverable for a longer period. If natural resistance or medical interventions are

Correspondence to: Dr. S. Chiriac, Spitalul Clinic Judetean Timioara, Clinica Politrauma, b-ul I. Bulbuca nr. 156 Timioara, Romania
177

inadequate, a chronic type or subacute infection can occur7. Typically, clinical features of acute PID are fever, systemic signs of toxic illness, lower abdominal pain with tenderness in both iliac fosses, signs of peritonism. Speculum examination of vagina shows: purulent discharge from the external cervical and uterus and annexes are tender4, 8, 9: vagina is hyperemic and extremely warm10. Except for Neisseria gonorhoeae, cultures are not useful for clinical management, infection is usually polimicrobial and time-consuming (by the time the results become available the disease has usually been cured with antimicrobial drug therapy)4. In many cases, it is not possible to grow the pathogenic microbe10. Other diagnostic signs are leucocitosis >10000/mm3, inflammatory pelvic mass on examination or ultrasonography5. In patients requiring further studies, the following can be performed: culdocentesis with purulent material 5, pelvic CT scanning, and laparoscopy 9 direct visualization is the most accurate method of diagnosis 1. Treatment in PID is a medical problem (antibiotics) 5, 9, but may have profound surgical implications 8. Surgery becomes necessary under the following conditions: intraperitoneale rupture of a tubo-ovarian abscess8, 9, the persistence of a pelvic abscess despite antibiotic therapy8, 9 and chronic abdominal pain8, 9. Abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingooophorectomy was in the past the treatment of choice. It may be possible to make unilateral salpingooophorectomy in rupture of tubo-ovarian abscess8,9 or percutaneous or vaginal drainage of Douglas pouch2, salpingostomy5.

Case study
A 20-year-old female patient is admitted through the emergency room, brought by the ambulance from 50km away, with abdominal pain, in state of consciousness, cooperative, hemodynamically stable. She is a patient during the lactating period, 7 months after her second birth, with limited social condition (unemployed, illiterate). She declares the beginning of her illness being 7 days earlier, when she suffered an abdominal trauma (kicks and punches), but the symptoms increased in the last few hours. At hospitalization, the abdomen is sensitive and by palpation in the lower part, mimics muscular defense, intestinal transit present by auscultation, rectal tact characterized by Douglas scream. Laboratory exams: leucositosis (18800 leucocytes/mm3), hemoglobin of 10g/dl, urine exam: microhematuresis (5-10 red cells/field), leucocyteuresis (30-40 leucocytes/field), microbial flora present, Trichomonas present. The diagnosis is that of nonsurgical acute abdomen and the decision is that of surveillance under symptomatic treatment, antibiotherapy until the result of the urine culture arrives and the proceeding of the clinical and paraclinical investigations. Abdominal and vaginal ultrasonography and the urological exam showed moderate quantity of liquid in the Douglas pouch and minimal quantity of liquid in the Morrison space, medium right pielo-caliceal distension (fig. 1), urinary bladder with a thickened wall, wavy and edematous mucosa (>10 mm thick), without postmictional residue. The investigations also showed uterus with normal dimensions and normal echostructure, left ovarus with no ultrasonographical

Figure 1. Abdominal US: perihepatic fluid, right hydronefrosis

Figure 2. Abdominal US: uterus with normal dimensions and echostructure, mixt unhomogenous right latero-uterin mass r 10/10cm, fluid in Douglas pouch.

178

in distension (fig. 5) until the crossing with the iliac vessels; there are no hepatic or splenic lesions; retropancreatic adenopathy; there is liquid in the Douglas pouch. For the completion of the documentation, after 36 hours of hospitalization, diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) was performed: clear, yellowish liquid, with no hematic aspect. The cytological exam showed cellular microscopy piece, with rare red cells, isolated and gathered granulocytes, and rare lymphocytes. Bacteriology: Staphilococcus aureus, sensitive to the majority of the antibiotics used in the test. The patient state is improved, with fever above 380C Figure 3. Vaginal US: mixt unhomogenous right in the first 48 hours and subfeverish afterwards. The latero- uterin mass, fluid in Douglas pouch. patient is able too walk and eat. The abdominal pains modifications, a right-sided latero-uterine mixt decrease under analgetics and antibiotic treatment: inhomogenous mass, 10 cm in diameter (fig. 2, 3). Cefort, Gentamicyn, and Metronidazol. The gynecological exam shows: lactation Ultrasonographically, the tumoral mass is persistent, amenorrhea, (negative pregnancy test), cervix with a even increases in size, same as the right hydronefrosis. few unresorbable threads at the commissura with small Due to the persistence of the pelvic mass, the ascites, areas of suppuration, which are suppressed; hard uterus, and the hydronefrosis, the surgical intervention is with the volume a little bit enhanced, touch sensitive. decided. Median subombilical laparotomy is performed, The right latero-uterine mass is hard and sensitive at in the 9th day of hospitalization, in collaboration with the palpation. Antibiotics are recommended, in triple urologist. Clear liquid is found in the peritoneal cavity and association, with suspicion of PID. a tumoral hard block lateral of the uterus, corresponding We asked for an abdomino-pelvic CT-scan, to the right annexa, invading the right pelvic wall (fig. 6). inhomogeneous mass, parenchimatous, holding the We found distended ureter (diameter above 20 mm) (fig. contrast substance, polilobated, situated in the uterine 7), invasion of the last ileal ansa, right iliac adenopathy. projection area, extended towards the parameters, We consider the weakly delimitated tumor as malignant. 11/10 cm in diameter, which determines the Through combined abdomino-pelvic and anterior compression of the urinary bladder and the infiltration of (Retzius space) approach, the tumor is dissected and a its posterior wall (fig. 4). The left ureter has normal subtotal resection is performed (fig. 8), because of the caliber, with its trajectory through the pathological pelvic pelvic invasion, including the ureter. formation; right ureterohydronephrosis, with the ureter

Figure 4. Abdomino-pelvic CT: mixt inhomogenous parenchimatous right latero-uterin mass r 10/11cm with compression on the urinary bladder 179

Figure 5. Abdominal CT: right ureterohydronephrosis

Figure 6. Intraoperative aspect: hard right latero-uterin tumoral block, invading the right pelvic wall

Figure 7. Intraoperative aspect: distended ureter, included in the tumoral block

Figure 8. Resection piece: tumor (hard on section)

180

Figure 9. Intraoperative aspect: segmentary resection of the invaded ileum

Figure 10. Hystopathological exam HEx200 (ob 20): ovarus with acute supurative inflammation and forming of microabscesses limited by a pyogenic membrane

Figure 11. Hystopathological exam HEx200 (ob 20): uterine tube with supurative inflammation and microbial colonies

The ileal segmentary resection (fig. 9) is anastomosed termino-terminal and a biopsy from the iliac nodes is performed. The postsurgical evolution under antibiotherapy for 3 days is favorable, with intestinal transit restarted; the surgical wound has a simple evolution, with no fever. The patient checks out in the 8th day after surgery, with persistent hydronefrosis. The histopathological exam, after another 3 days, surprises us, considering the aspect during surgery and that of the resection piece: ovarian tissue fragment massively infiltrated with lymphoplasmocytes and granulocytes, constituting abscesses hotbed (fig. 10) inflammatory festering process, extended towards the tube, it has no tumoral aspects (fig. 11). The excised intestinal wall presents massive edema of the serosa, massive inflammatory process with lymphocytes, histiomacrocytes, neutrocytes, and eosinocytes, forming rare festering microabscesses (fig. 12).
181

Figure 12. Hystopathological exam HEx200 (ob 20): intestinal wall with supurative inflammation and massive inflammatory process with eosinocytes dissociating the muscular layer

The patient does not return for monitorization and therapy after the histopathological result. Instead, she shows up after aproximately 3 months, without drug therapy, in good health and remission of the hydronephrosis.

Discussions
This case was special to us because of the difficulty to precisely diagnose this disease. This aspect has been manifesting from the admission: anamnesis and clinical exam. Further, on, uncertain data were brought by the laboratory, DPL and imagistic exams (ultrasonography and CT-scan) and even the laparotomy. In the end, only the hystopathological exam and the evolution of the case clarified the diagnosis towards a particular type of PID. In the first few hours from admittance, we obtained the following data: anamnesis (a young female patient 20 years old, without any personal or heredo-collateral significant diseases, suffering from lactational amenorrhea, abdominal concussion 7 days old, persistent abdominal pains, increased during the day). The clinical exam was performed (patient in state of consciousness, dehydrated, hemodynamically stable, with pain in the lower segment of the abdomen during palpation, mimicking muscular defense), ultrasonographical exam (fluid in the peritoneal cavity in 2 quadrants medium quantity11, right hydronephrosis, mixed, inhomogenous, right pelvic mass) and laboratory analysis (leucocitosis, mild anemia, microhematuresis, leucocyteuresis, bacteriuria). First, we thought of hemoperitoneum by trauma or ruptured extrauterine pregnancy. The hemoperitoneum by trauma was considered due to the anamnesis, the clinical symptoms, and especially the fluid in the peritoneal cavity, detected by ultrasonography. Never the less, we did not proceed emergency laparotomy, because of the hematological stability, the hemoglobin, and the hydronephrosis which suggests a nontraumatic lesion. The pelvic hematocele in case of rupture of extrauterine pregnancy was under suspicion because of the age, amenorrhea, the pelvic mass, and the fluid in the Douglas space. The negative pregnancy test and the gynecological exam (lactational amenorrhea) dismissed the diagnosis. In the end, DPL with clear citrin liquid, exclude any form of hemoperitoneum, traumatic or pathological. After the first few hours from admission and especially after the DPL we considered the diagnosis to be of nontraumatic pathology: pelvic mass with right secondary ureterohydronephrosis, ascites. The

differential diagnosis of this pelvic tumor was made between PID, ovarian neoplasm (the most common origin of an extrauterine mass7) and genital tuberculosis. The diagnosis of PID was based on the gynecological exam (cervix with a few nonresorbable threads, with small local suppurations, sensitive uterus with an increased volume, sensitive right latero-uterine mass), fever and leucocytosis, bacteriological and cytological exam of the DPL liquid. A series of data, though, do not sustain this diagnosis: evening fever above 38o C, which decreased to a underfever status after 48 hours, before antibiotherapy with triple association; also leucocytosis decreased from 18800/mm3 to 14000/mm3. The usual signs of toxemia were also missing. The intraperitoneal fluid is rarely found and when existent it is described as purulent (torn tubo-ovarian abscess) or blurry (pelvic peritonitis)5,12. In addition, the CT scan and the ultrasonographical exam describe the pelvic mass and the associated hydronefrosis as characteristics of a polimitotic process. The ovarian neoplasm is most likely to appear in good general health (characterizing the initial stages of the cancer) and the aspect of the peritoneal liquid (citrin-like). The imagistic data is even more conclusive: pelvic tumoral mass, associated with ascites is probably a malignant ovarian tumor13,14. The same diagnosis is suggested by the secondary hydronephrosis, associated with the phenomena, which is also a factor of reserved prognosis in ovarian tumors7. The extension to the lateral pelvic wall and urinary bladder can be evaluated as well. Of course, all these signs are ones of great probability, the differential diagnosis between malignant and benign ovarian tumors being uncertain, considering only the ultrasonography7,9,13. Genital tuberculosis, despite its rareness, may be considered, because of the fever, the abdomino-pelvic pain, and the intra-operative aspect of pelvic block, including all the viscera in the region5 (the pseudocarcinomatous ovarian form13). A series of data, though, dismiss this diagnosis: lack of personal and familiar history (even if found in only 55% of the cases 15), negative pulmonary radiography, biochemical exam (lack of proteins) and bacteriological exam of the ascites liquid, the lack of miliary intraperitoneal granulocytes (small nodules, tubercles)5,15,16. During surgery, a hard tumoral mass was established, right lateral of the uterus, with the following aspects pleading for a malignant process: hard tumoral block, fixed to the pelvis14,15, ureterohydronephrosis, the invasion of the small intestine16. The solid ovarian cancer
182

can be a one-sided tumor (or bilateral) having the aspect of a hard mass invading the peritoneum, associated with ascites16. We were a little reticent due to the lack of the extemporaneous hystopathological exam, the normal aspect of the contralateral ovarus in the conditions of a certain local invasion and the complete absence of peritoneal serosa interest in other regions, such as the great epiploon. In the end though, the hystopathological exam and the evolution of the patient determined us to reevaluate the case from the perspective of a particular variety of PID. We succeeded in acquiring the chart from the town hospital where the patient gave birth, 7 months prior to the admission in our service. It was a natural birth with natural deliverance, the rupture of the left commissura of the cervix. Instrumental control was practiced after deliverance and the suture of the cervix. The postpartum evolution was physiological, without any medication. The patient does not return for the suppressing of the suture threads. The principal data that point towards pelvin neoplasm (ascites, secondary hydronephrosis, and invasion of the small bowel) are also described by some authors in PID. Ascites in the Douglas pouch may be found in 50% of the cases with acute PID and in 10% of the chronic cases12. The pelvic cellulites can determine ureteral obstruction, under the form of diffuse infection in the pelvi-subperitoneal cellular tissue15 or concrete parametritis17, the latter being associated with severe overall affection state of prostration17. In some cases of PID, the inflammatory process continues, the pelvic adhesions become more pronounced, with the loss of tissue plans and involvement of the bowel, leading to occlusion5. Primary pelvic peritonitis can be found after obstetrical maneuvers, continuity solutions of the cervix18. In case of a lying-in woman, the infection may lead to pelvic cellulites with a less acute evolution in rare cases, which tends towards forming a hard uneven mass of local infiltration with low resorbtion rate wooden phlegmon of the pelvis, with secondary hydronephrosis. Even more so, some endometritae produced after vaginal births are considered to provoke unnoticed parametrial cellulites18. Another entity used to define the tumoral parametrial block is the tubo-ovarian complex (TOC). It is described as an aglutination of the ovarus, tube and surrounding

structures 4, the abdominal pain being a characteristic. The aspect of the inflammation is differently appreciated by different authors; from the congestive form like an agglutination of the two organs to the surrounding tissues4, to the supurative form (extended, not bordered) such as the tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA)20,21. An appealing explanation would be that TOC and TOA represent different stages in the evolution of PID. As the infection ascends, the tube becomes hyperemic, thickened, covered with pus-forming exudate. The obstruction of the tube may occur, resulting in piosalpinx. If the infection remits in this stage, the hydrosalpinx is formed. If the peritonitis progresses, periovarian adherences may occur, with the fusion between the tube and the ovarus, resulting in TOC. A further progression of the inflammation can lead towards pus forming, in other words TOA22. This kind of stage-by-stage evolution sustains the theory according to which patients can benefit from individualized therapy, taking into consideration the severity of the disease and suggests the necessity of a greater differentiation between the stages of PID22. The minimal cooperation of the patient (she addresses the hospital only in limit situations) and the inefficient dispensary system, may explain the development of a very particular form of PID, in an unusual clinical context.

Conclusions
The patient has a low life standard and she does not respect the doctors recommendations after birth, addressing the hospital only in the conditions of intense abdominal pain, linked to a significant trauma. The clinic and paraclinic exams lead towards a probability diagnosis. The laparotomy and the laborious surgical procedure do not certificate the diagnosis and prognosis, until the hystopathological exam results arrive, which are in correlation with the evolution of the patient. The fact that PID is basically a medical problem, but may have profound surgical implications8, checks out. We consider having dealt with a particular case of PID, rarely described in medical literature, a case that is challenging therapeutically and scientifically for the physician.

183

Refrences: 1. Morton A. Stenchever, William Droegemueller, Herbst Arthur L., Daniel R., Jr, Mishell, Arthur L.Herbst - Comprehensive Gynecology 4th edition (September 6, 2002); electronic edition, cap. 23, p. 707 2. Beck Williams W. Jr. Obstetrica si ginecologie. National Medical Series editia a 4-a. Ed. Medicala Amaltea Williams and Wilkins 1998 ISBN 973-98167-0-3 NMS p. 236-245 3. Jonathan S. Berek Novaks Gynecology: 2002 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; electronic edition, cap. 15, p. 23 4. Peter J. Morris, William C. Wood Oxford Textbook of Surgery (3-Volume Set) 2nd edition (January 15, 2000) By Oxford Press, electronic edition, cap 36.3, p. 181 5. Alan H. DeCherney and Lauren Nathan Current Obstetric & Gynecologic Diagnosis & Treatment, 9th Edition 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; electronic ed., cap 38, p. 43 6. Brandon J. Bankowski, Amy E. Hearne, Nicholas C. Lambrou, Harold E. Fox, Edward E. Wallach The Johns Hopkins Manual of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2nd edition (May 2002); The Johns Hopkins University Department (Producer) By Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers; electronic edition, cap. 24 p. 30, cap 43 p. 51 7. The Principles and Practice of Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2nd edition Appleton-Century-Crofts 1980 USA ISBN 0-8386-7955-8; p. 322, 384, 430-440 8. Schwartz S. I., Shires G. T., Spencer F. C., Husser W. C. Principles of Surgery; Mc Graw-Hill International Edition 1994 ISBN 0-07-113676-2; p. 1756-1757 9. Seymour I. Schwartz, Josef E. Fischer, John M. Daly, Aubrey C. Galloway, G. Tom Shires, Frank C. Spencer Principles of Surgery, Companion Handbook 7th edition (December 18, 1998) By McGraw-Hill Professional; electronic edition; cap. 39, p. 46 10. Schwartz S. I., Shires G. T., Spencer F. C., Store E. H. Principles of Surgery 4th edition; International edition by Mc Graw-Hill Book Company 1987 ISBN 0-07-Y66539-7; p. 1800-1801 11. Sirlin C. B., Casola Giovanna, Brown Michele Quantification of Fluid on Screening Ultrasonography for Blunt Abdominal Trauma A Simple Scoring System to Predict Severity of Injury; J. Ultrasound Med. 2001; 20: p. 356-364 12. Callen P. W. Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology 4th edition by W. B. Saunders Company 2000 ISBN 0-7216-8135-8; p. 871 13. Kurja K. Progress in Medical Ultrasound, Exerpta Medica vol I/1980; p. 138 14. Fleischer A., Romero R., Manning F. et. al The Principles and Practice of Ultrasonography in Ostetrics and Gynecology 4th edition by Prentice-Hall International Edition 1991 ISBN 0-8385-7957-4, p. 538 15. Proca E. Tratat de patologie chirurgicaln, Vol VII Ginecologie (coordonator Sirbu P.); Editura Medical Bucureti 1983 ; p. 282-319, 305, 368-387, 434-435, 561 16. Scott J. R., DiSaia P. J., Hammond C. B., Spellacy W. N Danforths Obstetrics and Gynecology 6th edition; p. 954-956 17. Negru I., Rusu O. Ginecologie i obstetricn vol I Editura Didactic i Pedagogic Bucureti 1981; p. 134-155, 223 18. Munteanu I. Tratat de obstetricn Editura Academiei Romne 2000 ISBN 973-27-0789-5; cap. 10, p. 716-718 19. Mangubat Maria Benign Ovarian Tumor HerWord.coms resident OB Gynecologist discussion on ovarian masses 20. Walden M. J., Carter W. R. Tubo-ovarian Abscess MedPixTM Disease topic 6051 21. Silva S., Torriani R. R., Baldeon J. C., Herrera D. J. Complejo tubo-ovrico: Revisin de casos en el Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia (1990-1999) 22. Bulas D. J., Ahlstrom P. A., Sivit C. J. - Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in the Adolescent: Comparison of Transabdominal and Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation and Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation

184

You might also like