Congresswoman Mary Bono Mack US House Con Resolution 127 How Michael Darland helps Internet Governance to pass

from US To ITU at WCIT 2012. Dear Mary, I enjoyed your letter of July 27, 2012. I congratulate you on all your good works. I noted your statements re: HR. 127: My goal is simple, but critically important: Keep the Internet free of any government control. A vote for my resolution is a vote to keep the Internet free from government control and to prevent Russia, China, India and other nations from succeeding in giving the U.N. unprecedented power over Web content and infrastructure. If this power grab is successful, Im concerned that the next Arab Spring will instead become a Russian winter, where free speech is chilled, not encouraged, and the Internet becomes a wasteland of unfilled hopes, dreams and opportunities. We cant let that happen. You are obviously a wonderful convinced North American patriot. But please take off the blinders. Take a close look at the BRICS world opportunities and its contributions to the global economy. Then pay attention to what really goes on in America. I concede it must be hard for you to do that. IMHO, North America is an isolated island in a sea of worlds which are foreign to most of that islands population. Thus, although America is not humble enough and not diplomatically equipped to rule the waves of change around the globe, it wants to rule the oceans of communications all over the world! (c) Do you honestly believe that the US and/or Google respect Article 19 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights? My web site www.freespeech-internetcontrol.com speaks to the contrary. Reminder: Article 19 states: People shall have the right to access information through any media and regardless of frontiers. According to the evidence throughout my web site, there is no difference between a censor in China, Russia or the Arab States and a despotic biased Judge in America.

Therefore, the world can and should reach consensus for Internet control to pass from the US NGOs to the ITU UN at WCIT 2012 in Dubai in December in order for Article 19 to be respected. Check out my case in point: My true to life story is the one of the little guy from Africa. You can read all about it on www.freespeech-internetcontrol.com A quick insight into how retired Judge Michael Cooper, Ellensburg attorney, Jeff Slothower, and Michael Darland, FreedomWorks, Bellevue, are helping promote consensus in favor of Internet governance passing from a majority of US NGOs to the ITU at WCIT 2012: At the request of Michael Darland, FreedomWorks, Bellevue, (Digital Systems Precursor of Voice Link Mosaix and Avaya) judge Michael Cooper, granted a hasty ruling denying me free speech globally without trial at the end of a marathon hearing. That discriminatory ruling could very well help reach consensus in favor of Internet control passing from US NGOs to the ITU UN organization. Oddly enough, at a timely conference in India, Mr. Ramanjit Singh Chima, Policy Analyst for Google India Pvt. Ltd. pointed out at that conference that US judges are often asked to consider on a matter about regulating content online, whereas they had themselves probably never been largely exposed to the online world. Mr. Singh Chima goes on to say: That brings in the realization that neither lawyers nor judges have the answers all the time. But our life and that of our progeny for generations to come is affected. For the rest of the story check out: http://www.scribd.com/doc/101189655/Kittitas-Superior-Court-Judge-ElectionCandidates-Chief-Prosecutor-Paul-Sander-Judge-Frances-Chmelewski-and-Jim-Denison In the light of all the hard evidence above and thru the links, I pray that you keep an open mind; that you forget HR. 127; that you add your voice to all those around the globe seeking consensus for Internet governance to pass from US NGOs to the ITU UN World Body for the benefit of the family of nations. cc. Henry Waxman, Anna Eshoo.