Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Definitions
a. author b. no definition of Copyright c. originality means that the work owes its creation to the author and this in turn means that the work must not consist of actual copying. It is independently created by the author. No large measure of novelty is necessary. It is enough that the author contributes something more than a merely trivial variation, something recognizably his own. - sculptural works that realistically depict animals are original. - Norma Ribbon & Trimming v. Little: Ribbon flowers do not possess originality having existed since the 18th century.
Basic Principles
a. Works are protected by the sole fact of their creation, irrespective of their mode or form of expression as well as their content, quality and purpose. (This is referred to as the No Formality Rule) b. Protection starts from the moment of creation. (Registration is NOT a condition for protection)
Basic Principles
c. Protection is on the EXPRESSION of the idea not the idea itself. Joaquin v. Drilon, 302 SCRA 225 The general concept or format of the dating game show is not copyrightable. Only the audio visual recording of each episode of Rhoda & Me are covered by copyright Copyright does not prohibit use of the information taught and the forms included as part of the work
Pearl & Dean Inc. v. Shoemart et. Al G.R. No. 148222, August 15, 2003
- Waldman v. Landoll
periodicals and newspapers and other writings - fabric designs, such as art work on sweaters are writings lectures, sermons. Prepared for oral delivery letters dramatic works, choreographic works or entertainment in dumb shows - dramatic works imply a story consisting of plot and incident
WORKS ENTITLED TO PROTECTION (CONTINUED) b. Derivative works In order a work to qualify as a derivative work it must be independently copyrightable. there must be at least some substantial variation from the underlying work, not merely trivial variation. However by, definition, a derivative work is substantially similar to the original work. a license is required to transform it to a derivative work!
Note: that its affectivity is only coterminous with the original work.
Notes: Compilation of Data Facts, as such, are not copyrightable but a compilation of facts may be copyrightable if the author made choices as to which facts to include, in what order to place them, and how to arrange the collected data so that they may be used effectively by readers. Example: copyrightable use can valuation Information v. Mac Lean Hunter Recipes Feist Publication v. Rural Tele Services Co. - as a rule telephone directories are not
See: MAI Systems v. Peak Computer Inc. - copying occurs when a computer program is transferred from a permanent storage device to a computer RAM.
The first public distribution of the original and each copy of the work by sale or other forms of transfer of ownership; Playboy Enterprises Inc. v. George Frena et. al (i) When is the distribution right exhausted? - after the first sale of a particular copy (ii) Other economic rights are not affected
Copyright ownership
a. Original works b. Works of joint authorship c. Works by employees d. Commissioned works Ownership of the work belongs to the person who commissioned the work, but the Copyright to it belongs to the creator.
Assignment of Copyright
Sec. 181. Copyright is distinct from the material object; transfer of one does not include the other.
Limitations on Copyright
a. Recitation/ performance of a work if done privately or for charitable/ religious institution FILSCAP v. Tan, 148 SCRA 461 b. Quotations compatible with fair-use provided source is named Habana v. Robles, 310 SCRA 511 The similarity in style and the manner the books were presented and the identical examples cannot pass as similarities merely because of technical considerations.
Public display not by means of a film, slide, television image or on screen of works that have been published, sold or transferred to others
Note : The foregoing shall be interpreted to allow use of a work in a way which does not conflict with the normal exploitation of the work and does not unreasonably prejudice the right holders legitimate interest
Limitations
-
The fair use of a copyrighted work for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching including multiple copies for classroom use, scholarship, research, and similar purposes is not an infringement of copyright. Decompilation, which is understood here to be the reproduction of the code and translation of the forms of the computer program to achieve the inter operability of an independently created program with other programs may also constitute fair use; the factors to be considered shall include:
a. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for a non-profit educational purpose; b. The nature of the copyrighted work;
Limitations (continued)
c.
The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
d. The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. See: Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios Inc. 464 U.S. 417, Supreme Court 984 MGM v. Grokster 545 U.S. Supreme Court, June 27, 2005
Term of Copyright
Moral Rights
a. Attribution of authorship b. Publication right c. Right to protect the integrity of the work
Droite de Suite
In every sale subsequent to the first sale or lease of an original work of painting or sculpture or manuscript of writer or composition of the author or his heirs is untilled to 5% of the proceeds of the sale or lease
Same as copyright
NEIGHBORING RIGHTS
These are rights of:
Performers in their performances Producers of Sound Recordings in their sound recordings Broadcasting Organizations in their radio & television programs
NEIGHBORING RIGHTS
Definitions
a. performers b. sound Recording means the fixation of the sounds of a performance or of other sounds, or representation of sound, other than in the form of fixation incorporated in a cinematographic or other audiovisual work;
Definitions (continued)
c. audiovisual work or fixation is a work that consists of a series of related images which impart the impression of motion, with or without accompanying sounds, susceptible of being made audible; d. fixation means the embodiment of sounds, or of the representations thereof, from which they can be perceived, reproduced or communicated through a device;
Definitions (continued)
e. producer of sound recording Responsible for the first fixation of sounds of a performance or other sounds or representation of sounds; f. broadcasting means the transmission by wire-less means for the public reception of sounds or of images or of representations thereof; such transmission by satellite is also broadcasting where the means for decrypting are provided to the public by the broadcasting organization or with its consent;
Definitions (continued)
g. Communication to the public of a performance or a sound recording means the transmission to the public, by any medium, otherwise than by broadcasting, of sounds of a performance or the representations of sounds fixed in a sound recording. For purposes of Section 209, communication to the public includes making the sounds or representations of sounds fixed in a sound recording audible to the public.
Limitations
Same as in copyright (mutatis mutandis)
Single equitable remuneration to the performers the producer of the sound recording if a sound recording is used for broadcasting or for other communication to the public for profit.
Broadcasting organizations shall enjoy the exclusive right to carry out, authorize or prevent any of the following acts:
a. The REBROADCASTING of their broadcast; b. The RECORDING in any manner, including the making of films or the use of video tape, of their broadcasts for the purpose of communication to the public of television broadcasts of the same; c. The use of such records for FRESH TRANSMISSIONS or for fresh recordings.
ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp. v. Philippine Multi-Media System, Inc. (PMSI) G.R. Nos. 17569-70, January 19, 2009
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
What constitutes copyright infringement? Columbia Pictures v. Court of Appeal 260, SCRA 144 - To constitute infringement, it is not necessary that the whole or even a large portion of the work shall have been copied. If so much is taken that the value of the original is sensibly diminished, or the labors or the original author are substantially and to an injurious extent appropriated by another, that is sufficient in point of law to constitute a piracy;
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
Remedies a. Judicial: Civil or Criminal (Bureau of Legal Affairs, IPO Jurisdiction : RTC (Commercial Courts) b. Administrative: and DTI Regional Offices)
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
Other principles mere possession of infringing articles for sale, distribution or exhibit punishable presumption of authorship The natural person whose name is indicated on a work is presumed to be the author of the work Notice to the defendant that work is copyrighted is not required but proof of access to the work must be established
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
Essential Elements of Copyright Infringement: Defendant had access to the copyrighted work The defendants work is substantially similar to the copyrighted work The ordinary observer test (Habana v. Robles)
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
Civil Remedies for Infringement injunction restraining infringement payments of actual, moral and exemplary damages impounding of sales invoices, all articles and their packaging during pendency of the action Destruction without compensation of all of any article which may serve as evidence in court proceedings
1 year to 3 years P50,000.00 to P150,000.00 3 years and 1 day to 6 years P150,000.00 to P500,000.00 6 years and 1 day to 9 years P500,000.00 to P1,500,000.00
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
Jurisdiction: RTC (Commercial Courts) Bureau of Legal Affairs, Intellectual Property Office and DTI Regional Offices
To obtain a search warrant in a criminal action for infringement, is presentation of master tapes of movies allegedly infringed necessary to establish probable cause? a. 20th Century Fox v. Court of Appeal
164 SCRA 6555 b. Columbia Pictures v. Court of Appeals 260 SCRA 144 The requirement for the presentation of the master tapes of the copyrighted films for the validity of the search warrants merely serve as a guidepost in determining the existence of probable cause.where there is doubt as toe the true nexus of the master tapes and the pirated copies.
COPYRIGHT
1. A textbook in bookkeeping was published, claiming to propose a less cumbersome and more logical arrangement of recording data. Which one of the following is prohibited by the copyright on the book? Choose one answer. ! a. the use of the bookkeeping systems in the accounting schools for teaching purposes the use of the recommended forms by bookkeepers for the recordal of quotation of the short passages of the book, naming the author as the
! data ! source !
b.
c.
d.
COPYRIGHT
2. The author of a textbook entitled College English of Today (CET) sued the author and publisher of Developing English Proficiency (DEP), a textbook for English grammar, for copyright infringement. CET alleges that DEP copied extensively CETs style, manner and presentation and used examples that are identical to those used by CET. DEP did not acknowledge at all that the identical examples and the similarities in the style and manner of presentation is sourced from CET. Will the action prosper? Choose one answer. ! a. No, CET has no copyright on the rules on English grammar No, what are taught in both CET and DEP are sourced from foreign authors. Yes, because DEP did not comply with the provision of law that in case of the source and the should be mentioned. No, because even assuming CET enjoys copyright protection, DEP can fair use limitation done for
! !
b. c.
COPYRIGHT
3. Sony Corporation manufactures and sells videotape records (known as betamax) which are capable of recording movies immediately at later time (hometime shifting use) shown in television networks. The users also record educational, religious or sports or current events which are not covered by copyright. The movie producers who owned the copyright of the movie sued Sony for contributory infringement. Will the action prosper? Choose one answer. ! works ! ! b. c. Yes, because the sale of betamax is for commercial purpose No, because the VTR or betamax is capable of substantial non-infringing use, hence it use Yes, because it will affect the potential market of the movie producers a. Yes, because it induces the unauthorized reproduction of copyrighted
constitutes fair ! d.
COPYRIGHT
4. Pearl and Dean manufactures advertising display units (light boxes) --printed posters sandwiched between plastic sheets and illuminated with black lights --- sued shoemart for installing exact copies thereof in its establishments. Shoemart once offered to lease the light boxes/ The action was for infringement of copyright on the light boxes. Will the action prosper? Choose one answer. ! Dean ! Pearl and ! c. b. Yes, because Shoemart is in bad faith since it knew that the light boxeswere conceptualized by Dean No, because the copyright of Pearl and Dean covers only the technical drawings of the light not the light boxes themselves Yes, because Shoemart took advantage of its dominant position as a huge establishment to enrich itself at the expense of small entrepreneurs a. Yes, because Shoemart uses light boxes which are identical to those designed by Pearl and
boxes and ! d.
COPYRIGHT
5. You bought a textbook on Corporation Law written by Dean Cesar Villanueva. Which of the following are you allowed to do by the Copyright Law? Choose one answer. ! a. to scan the book and store it in the hard drive of your computer to copy and reproduce substantial portions of the textbook for use in thesis ! c. to summarize and make an outline of the book to sell the book after you decide to take up nursing
! your
b.
d.
COPYRIGHT
6.
Source: WIPO
The music of a famous composer of the 18th century was performed by an Australian pianist in a concert hall. The local radio station recorded that concert with a view to transmitting it to the public without seeking anyones permission. Is this action lawful? Choose one answer. ! a. No, it is not. The heirs of the composer are alive and entitled to remuneration Yes, it is. The radio company has only a limited capacity to transmit the music and only within small area Yes, it is. The music was composed in the 18th century and thus it is now in the public domain does not enjoy any kind of protection No, it is not. The radio company needs to seek the permission of the pianist to record the concert because she is still enjoying related rights
! one ! and !
b.
c.
d.
COPYRIGHT
7. Which of the following acts refers to the moral rights of the author: Choose one answer. ! ! ! ! ! ! a. b. c. d. e. f. To object to the translation of the work To authorize distribution of copies of work To authorize the performance of the work To object to the work being distorted To object to photocopying of his/her work To authorize advertising of his/her work
Source: WIPO
COPYRIGHT
8.
Source: WIPO
Mr. Gil is a renowned author who has written more than 50 books. He does not know how to use the Internet. One day, with the help of his son, by chance he was able to access the website where an unknown company B was selling all his books online via the Internet. Mr. Gill did not know what to do. He approaches you for advice on what he should do regarding this matter. Does he have any right regarding his works sold on the Internet? Choose one answer. ! a. Mr. Gill has the right on his books sold via the Internet, and Company Bs action should be considered as an infringement Mr. Gill does not have any right on his books sold on the Internet as the delivery mechanism is different Mr. Gill cannot prevent others from selling books on the Internet since they are in the public domain Mr. Gill has only moral right on the book sold via the Internet, but not the economic rights Mr. Gills rights are limited to the printed books, not electronic ones, as he did not contribute to putting
b.
c.
d.
e.
COPYRIGHT
9.
A group of students at Mixit High School started an internet based rap music file sharing through their rap music website without asking permission from right holders. The website was a success, with tens of millions of web hits per day. The rap singers whose songs were exchanged through this website saw their music sales soar by 20 per cent. Nevertheless, the music producers of the labels got together and brought a legal action alleging that the act of downloading music through this website constituted an illegal activity and was tantamount to copyright infringement. They seek your advice on the damages. Which statement is correct: Choose one answer. ! which do ! b. a. The website does not infringes anyones rights since the music sharing was only among students not constitute the public The website was a good promotional tool for artists as evidenced by the soaring sales and was therefore not a copyright infringement Only the rap musicians can bring a legal action since they were the true rights owners The rap musicians and music producers should be awarded damages since only they have the right to authorize the distribution of their
c.
d.
COPYRIGHT
10. Which of the following works cannot be protected under copyright: Choose one answer. ! ! ! ! ! a. b. c. d. e. Musical compositions with words Musical compositions without words The conception of a novel An original work of poetry Computer programs
Source: WIPO