How much does it cost?

A bioclimatic house needn't be either cheaper nor more expensive, uglier or nicer, than any other. The bioclimatic house doesn't need the purchase and installation of complicated and expensive systems, but it just uses the regular architectural elements to increase the energetic performance and get a natural comfort. To achieve this, the bioclimatic design imposes a set of restrictions, but there still remains a lot of freedom to design according to individual taste.

What are its advantages? There are several reasons to adopt bioclimatic architecture, retrieving ancient techniques and using new ones: Nowadays we've got the energy problem. For example, electricity, that in appearance clean energy that comes home, is "dirty" in its origin: it is produced in a big percentage by burning fuel (oil, coke, gas), with the corresponding gas liberation, as CO2, that leads to the well-known greenhouse effect, increasing planet temperature; or as nitrogen oxides, that leads to the acid rain which is seriously damaging forests. Other big percentage has its origin in nuclear technology, with the well known problem of radioactive waste. To save money, in our electricity or fuel bill. To get on better with environment. We can swap from the hermetic and artificial house that doesn't takes into account environment, using powerful conditioning appliances to solve the problem, to the house that integrates and cleverly uses environment and climate conditions to solve its needs. http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Facility/8776/Pag01I.htm Then, why bioclimatic architecture is not well known? Welfare concept has been evolving in a curious manner. As well as clothes mean much more that the need for thermal protection (and then we evolve towards the concept of fashion), housing means more than the need for a comfortable place to live, and may represent, for example, a status symbol. As that symbol, it must adapt to the established standards of status. Energy saving and taking advantage of sun may not fit these standards, but having an expensive conditioning system to overheat in winter

and overcool in summer every single space in the house (even if it is seldom used) may do. In despite of sporadic awareness campaigns, publicity takes pride every day to associate saving with discomfort and low status, and waste with easy living and prestige. And it gets the point: a lot of people associates saving to poverty. In fact the economical system needs us to consume as much as possible so as to keep the wheel going. It is not possible to see energy supply companies interested in new technologies for saving (how will they increase their benefits?), as well as conditioning manufacturers interested in alternative systems that bust their technology. Architects and builders don't either worry as far as their business goes well, and the consumer, with no information on the topic, cannot demand alternative products he does not know. But governments, aware of the energy waste problem, promote research on the topic and generate new legislation and standards. For example, something as simple as good isolation in buildings to keep heat inside is a topic for legislation of increasing importance. And in a lot of countries institutions are appearing which perform research and spread bioclimatic knowledge among architects and builders (like CIEMAT in Spain). Hundreds of books have been written on the topic, and hundreds of projects related somehow to bioclimatic architecture have been implemented around the world.

Bioclimatic architecture deals exclusively with housing design and materials to achieve energy efficiency. Nevertheless, people interested in alternative architecture will find other terms related to this. Passive solar architecture. It refers to housing design for the efficient use of solar energy. As it doesn't use mechanical systems (thus the term passive), it is closely related to bioclimatic architecture, though the later doesn't only deal with solar energy, but with other climatic elements. That's why the term bioclimatic is a litle bit more general, although both work in the same direction. Active solar architecture. It refers to taking advantage of solar energy by the means of mechanic and/or electric systems for heating (solar collectors) and electric conversion (photovoltaic pannels). They may complement a bioclimatic house. Renewable energy. It refers to sources of energy that cannot be exhausted. Bioclimatic

architecture is related to this topic because it uses solar radiation (renewable) for heating and cooling. Nevertheless, for a house we may consider other kind of energies, as wind or water power for electricity generation, or methane generation from organic waste. Sustainable architecture. This is a very general concept aiming to a minimum environmental impact of all the processes implied in housing, from materials (manufacturing processes that don't produce toxic waste and don't consume much energy), building techniques (for a minimum environmental damage), building location and its environmental impact, energy consumption and its impact, and the recycling of materials when the building has accomplished its function and is demolished. Bioclimatic architecture is related to it because it helps reducing the energy consumption while the building is in use. Self-sufficient house. It refers to a house independent from centralized supply networks (electricity, gas, water, and even food), by getting advantage of locally available resources (water from wells, streams or rain, energy from the sun or the wind, electricity from the sun, food from orchards, etc.). Bioclimatic architecture cooperates with self-sufficiency regarding energy saving for climatisation.