Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Overview
The National Invasive Species Act of 1996 (NISA) directed the United States Coast Guard in conjunction with the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center (SERC) to develop a clearinghouse for the synthesis, analysis, and interpretation of national data concerning ballast water management and ballast-mediated invasions. As a result, the National Ballast Water Information Clearinghouse (hereafter Clearinghouse) was established in 1997 at SERC. NISA calls for a variety of measures to reduce the risk of exotic species invasions associated with release of ballast water by ships. Among these, NISA requests that all ships arriving to U.S. ports from outside the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) follow voluntary guidelines for open-ocean exchange of ballast tanks that are to be discharged in U.S. waters. This management practice is intended to minimize the transfer of nonindigenous species (see Box 1 for discussion of ballast water, ballast water management, and relevant legislation). A key element of this legislation is tracking the effectiveness of voluntary guidelines for ballast water management. This assessment includes measuring: (a) the level of compliance with voluntary guidelines, (b) changes in the rate and patterns of ballast water delivery, and (c) reduction in the rate of ballast-mediated invasions. The Clearinghouse was created to provide synthesis and analysis of these measures on a national scale. More generally, the Clearinghouse will function as a central source of information on ballast water and ballast-mediated invasion to include: Spatial and temporal patterns of ballast water delivery and management; Patterns and rates of marine and estuarine invasions; Directory of ongoing and past research on ballast water and ballast-mediated invasions; General information on a broad range of topics relevant to this issue.
Together, these elements will provide a valuable resource, which is now lacking for ballast water management and ballast-mediated invasions. The Clearinghouse will produce reports on national patterns of ballast water management and invasion, as well as databases, that are available via the Internet. This approach is intended to provide access to a rich source of information for education, management, policy, and research.
The U.S. Coast Guard and the Clearinghouse are implementing a nationwide program, the National Ballast Survey (NABS), to measure ballast water management and delivery patterns for commercial vessels that arrive to U.S. ports from outside of the EEZ (see Box 1). The National Ballast Survey is designed explicitly to create a national database on ballast water that will allow us to: Measure patterns of ballast water delivery and management (including especially exchange); Measure among-year changes in ballast water management by vessel type, geographic region, and season; Assess the accuracy of data through use of multiple, independent data sources and direct water testing.
The data from NABS will be used to measure the rate of voluntary compliance with guidelines for openocean ballast exchange. We expect to estimate rates of ballast water exchange, both in terms of the frequency of vessels that undergo exchange and the percentage of ballast water exchanged, for different vessel types (e.g., bulk carriers, oil tankers, container ships, etc.). Furthermore, we plan to test for differences in space and time for (1) the rate of exchange and (b) the amount of foreign ballast release. The design phase for NABS is now nearing completion, and various aspects of the program have already been implemented. We expect this program to be fully implemented during 1999. The Clearinghouse is responsible for management and analysis of the extensive data collected under this program, and is assisting U.S. Coast Guard in the development and implementation of data collection techniques.
The National Ballast Survey will result in a comprehensive analysis and biennial report to the U.S. Congress on the status of ballast water delivery throughout the country. The first report and its underlying data will provide a nationwide baseline on the current status of ballast delivery and management patterns, and subsequent biennial reports will measure trends or changes in ballast water management. Although the Clearinghouse will provide analyses and interpretation of patterns for ballast water management, policy recommendations will be made by other groups outside the Clearinghouse.
Box 1. Ballast Water Introductions of Nonindigenous Species and Present Management Strategies.
Ballast water is carried by ships to provide stability and adjust a vessel's trim for optimal steering and propulsion. The use of ballast water varies among vessel types, among port systems, and according to cargo and sea conditions. Ballast water often originates from ports and other coastal regions, which are rich in planktonic organisms. It is variously released at sea, along coastlines, and in port systems. As a result, a diverse mix of organisms is transported and released around the world with the ballast water of ships. Today, ballast water appears to be the most important vector for marine species transfer throughout the world. The transfer of organisms in ballast water has resulted in the unintentional introduction of tens to hundreds of freshwater and marine species to the U.S. and elsewhere (Carlton and Geller 1993, NRC 1995, Carlton and Cohen 1998). Furthermore, the rate of new invasions from ballast water has increased in recent years (e.g., Mills et al. 1993, Carlton and Cohen 1998). Although the effects of many introductions remain unmeasured, it is clear that some invaders are having significant economic and ecological impacts as well as human-health consequences. Ballastmediated introductions such as the zebra mussel in the U.S. Great Lakes and toxic dinoflagellates in Australia have had tremendous ecological and economic impacts. Presently, ballast water exchange is the only effective management tool to reduce the risk of ballastmediated invasion. Ballast water exchange involves replacing coastal water with open-ocean water during a voyage. This process reduces the density of coastal organisms in ballast tanks that may be able to invade a recipient port, replacing them with oceanic organisms with a lower probability of survival in nearshore waters. Ballast water exchange is recommended as a voluntary measure by the International Maritime
Organization (IMO). However, it is important to recognize two short-comings of this procedure. First, the ability to safely conduct ballast water exchange depends upon weather and sea surface conditions, and it is not always possible to perform an exchange. Second, there is still some residual density of coastal organisms in ballast tanks following exchange, so this process is only partly effective. The Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-646) required that all vessels entering Great Lakes Ports from beyond the EEZ undergo ballast exchange or some comparably effective ballast treatment which conforms to discharge requirements of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251). These requirements were extended to vessels arriving in ports of the upper Hudson River, north of the George Washington Bridge on November 4, 1992. The National Invasive Species Act (NISA) of 1996 (P.L. 104-332) reauthorized and amended the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990. NISA issued mandatory ballast management reporting and voluntary ballast exchange guidelines to all vessels that enter U.S. waters from outside the EEZ, with the exception military vessels, crude oil tankers that carry out coastwise trade, and some passenger ships that are equipped with ballast treatment systems. If compliance with the voluntary guidelines is low, NISA authorizes the use of mandatory guidelines for vessels arriving to selected regions or the entire country. The National Ballast Water Information Clearinghouse will provide data and analysis to estimate the national patterns of ballast water management (see text). Policy decisions about the adequacy of voluntary guidelines and the acceptable rate of compliance will be based upon criteria and evaluation by a committee of the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force.