You are on page 1of 15

Summary for Samples

A nderson-D arling N ormality Test A -S quared P -V alue M ean S tDev V ariance S kew ness Kurtosis N M inimum 1st Q uartile M edian 3rd Q uartile M aximum 48.892 52.600 9 5 % C onfidence Inter vals
Mean Median 50 55 60 65

0.51 0.158 56.092 11.332 128.408 -1.13158 1.49670 12 29.800 52.575 56.400 66.900 68.700 63.292 66.879 19.240

30

40

50

60

70

95% C onfidence Interv al for M ean 95% C onfidence Interv al for M edian 95% C onfidence Interv al for S tDev 8.027

Dotplot of Samples

30

36

42

48 Samples

54

60

66

Dotplot of Thickness Measuement

1266

1272

1278 1284 1290 Thickness Measuement

1296

1302

1308

Summary for Thickness Measuement


A nderson-D arling N ormality Test A -S quared P -V alue M ean S tDev V ariance S kew ness Kurtosis N M inimum 1st Q uartile M edian 3rd Q uartile M aximum 1273.8 1272.1 9 5 % C onfidence Inter vals
Mean Median 1270 1275 1280 1285 1290 1295 1300

0.26 0.587 1288.4 15.8 249.6 -0.45031 -1.23807 7 1264.0 1275.0 1292.0 1301.0 1307.0 1303.0 1302.6 34.8

1260

1270

1280

1290

1300

1310

95% C onfidence Interv al for M ean 95% C onfidence Interv al for M edian 95% C onfidence Interv al for S tDev 10.2

Dotplot of Visual Interpetation

30

36

42 48 54 Visual Interpetation

60

66

Summary for Visual Interpetation


A nderson-D arling N ormality Test A -S quared P -V alue M ean S tD ev V ariance S kew ness Kurtosis N M inimum 1st Q uartile M edian 3rd Q uartile M aximum 33.697 35.824 9 5 % C onfidence Inter vals
Mean Median 35 40 45 50 55

0.32 0.446 43.975 12.294 151.143 0.85950 1.46268 8 26.720 37.030 40.740 50.505 67.900 54.253 51.872 25.022

24

36

48

60

95% C onfidence Interv al for M ean 95% C onfidence Interv al for M edian 95% C onfidence Interv al for S tDev 8.128

Dotplot of Solar Intensity

Mean=810

490

560

630

700 770 Solar Intensity

840

910

Sample Mean: It a balance the Data on either side .It is considered to be Balance point on Fulcrum. Here 810 is Balance point which balances data on both sides.

Summary for Solar Intensity


A nderson-D arling N ormality Test A -S quared P -V alue M ean S tDev V ariance S kew ness Kurtosis N M inimum 1st Q uartile M edian 3rd Q uartile M aximum 766.44 770.13 9 5 % C onfidence Inter vals
Mean Median 750 775 800 825 850 875 900

0.89 0.021 810.51 128.32 16465.61 -0.752229 -0.296077 35 498.00 708.00 835.00 918.00 960.00 854.59 902.87 168.12

500

600

700

800

900

95% C onfidence Interv al for M ean 95% C onfidence Interv al for M edian 95% C onfidence Interv al for S tDev 103.79

Boxplot of Cycles of Failure


2500

2000

Cycles of Failure

1500

1000

500

Summary for Cycles of Failure


A nderson-D arling N ormality Test A -S quared P -V alue M ean S tD ev V ariance S kew ness Kurtosis N M inimum 1st Q uartile M edian 3rd Q uartile M aximum 1307.7 1263.2 9 5 % C onfidence Inter v als
Mean Median 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550

0.25 0.735 1403.7 402.4 161913.9 -0.025085 -0.444524 70 375.0 1097.8 1436.5 1735.0 2265.0 1499.6 1538.2 482.8

400

800

1200

1600

2000

95% C onfidence Interv al for M ean 95% C onfidence Interv al for M edian 95% C onfidence Interv al for S tD ev 345.0

Median = 1436.5 , 1st Quartile=1098 ,3rd Quartile=1735 ,5th Quartile=0.05(70+1)=(758,785) below this data and 95th Quartile =0.95(70+1)=(2100,2130) above this values 95 % of the data is lying .

Summary for Yeild


A nderson-D arling N ormality Test A -S quared P -V alue M ean S tDev V ariance S kew ness Kurtosis N M inimum 1st Q uartile M edian 3rd Q uartile M aximum 88.472 87.600 9 5 % C onfidence Inter vals
Mean Median 87.5 88.0 88.5 89.0 89.5 90.0 90.5

0.73 0.055 89.376 4.316 18.627 0.101423 -0.746978 90 78.300 86.100 89.250 93.125 98.000 90.280 90.376 5.058

80

84

88

92

96

95% C onfidence Interv al for M ean 95% C onfidence Interv al for M edian 95% C onfidence Interv al for S tDev 3.764

Boxplot of Yeild
100

95

Yeild

90

85

80

Median = 89.25 , 1st Quartile=83.1 ,3rd Quartile=93.15,5th Quartile=0.05(90+1)=(83,83.1) below this data and 95th Quartile =0.95(90+1)=(96.4,96.8) above this values 95 % of the data is lying .

Boxplot of Joint Temperatures


90

80

Joint Temperatures

70

60

50

40

30

Summary for Joint Temperatures


A nderson-D arling N ormality Test A -S quared P -V alue M ean S tDev V ariance S kew ness Kurtosis N M inimum 1st Q uartile M edian 3rd Q uartile M aximum 61.747 62.471 9 5 % C onfidence Inter vals
Mean Median 62 64 66 68 70

0.58 0.122 65.861 12.159 147.837 -0.918150 0.843190 36 31.000 58.500 67.500 75.000 84.000 69.975 70.529 15.860

36

48

60

72

84

95% C onfidence Interv al for M ean 95% C onfidence Interv al for M edian 95% C onfidence Interv al for S tDev 9.862

Boxplot of Joint Temperatures_1


90

80

Joint Temperatures_1

70

60

50

40

Summary for Joint Temperatures_1


A nderson-D arling N ormality Test A -S quared P -V alue M ean S tDev V ariance S kew ness Kurtosis N M inimum 1st Q uartile M edian 3rd Q uartile M aximum 63.167 63.914 9 5 % C onfidence Inter vals
Mean Median 62 64 66 68 70 72

0.37 0.398 66.857 10.743 115.420 -0.602478 0.005899 35 40.000 60.000 68.000 75.000 84.000 70.548 71.391 14.076

40

50

60

70

80

95% C onfidence Interv al for M ean 95% C onfidence Interv al for M edian 95% C onfidence Interv al for S tDev 8.690

Boxplot of Inside Diameters


0.058 0.056 0.054

Inside Diameters

0.052 0.050 0.048 0.046 0.044 0.042 0.040

Summary for Inside Diameters


A nderson-D arling N ormality Test A -S quared P -V alue M ean S tDev V ariance S kew ness Kurtosis N M inimum 1st Q uartile M edian 3rd Q uartile M aximum 0.047537 0.048524 9 5 % C onfidence Inter vals
Mean Median 0.047 0.048 0.049 0.050 0.051

0.36 0.405 0.049390 0.003959 0.000016 -0.41300 1.17399 20 0.039500 0.047375 0.049750 0.051300 0.057100 0.051243 0.050400 0.005783

0.040

0.044

0.048

0.052

0.056

95% C onfidence Interv al for M ean 95% C onfidence Interv al for M edian 95% C onfidence Interv al for S tDev 0.003011

5th and 95th Percentile calculations:

Scatterplot of y vs x3
225 200 175 150

y
125 100 75 50 3 4 5 6 7 x3 8 9 10 11

Pearson correlation of y and x3 = 0.995 P-Value = 0.000

Scatterplot of y vs x1
225 200 175 150

y
125 100 75 50 14.0 14.5 15.0 x1 15.5 16.0

Pearson correlation of y and x1 = -0.883 P-Value = 0.000

Scatterplot of y vs x2
225 200 175 150

y
125 100 75 50 220 225 x2 230 235 240

Pearson correlation of y and x3 = 0.995 P-Value = 0.000

Scatterplot of y_1 vs x1_1


250

200

150

y_1
100 50 0 0 10 20 x1_1 30 40

Pearson correlation of y_1 and x1_1 = -0.852 P-Value = 0.031

Scatterplot of y_1 vs x2_1


240 220 200 180

y_1

160 140 120 100 800 900 1000 1100 x2_1 1200 1300 1400

Pearson correlation of y_1 and x2_1 = -0.898 P-Value = 0.015

Interptaion with respect Pearson Correlation value /r value :If 0<r<0.8 and 0.8<r<1

3 Chapter

rd

Main Difference will be identifying which of them are whole numbers and which of them are not.

Discrete & Continuous Data:


Discrete data can only take particular values. There may potentially be an infinite number of those values, but each is distinct and there's no grey area in between. Discrete data can be numeric -- like numbers of apples -- but it can also be categorical -- like red or blue, or male or female, or good or bad. Continuous data are not restricted to defined separate values, but can occupy any value over a continuous range. Between any two continuous data values there may be an infinite number of others. Continuous data are always essentially numeric. It sometimes makes sense to treat numeric data that is properly of one type as being of the other. For example, something like height is continuous, but often we don't really care too much about tiny differences and instead group heights into a number of discrete bins. Conversely, if we're counting large amounts of some discrete entity -- grains of rice, or termites, or pennies in the economy -- we may choose not to think of 2,000,006 and 2,000,008 as crucially different values but instead as nearby points on an approximate continuum. It can also sometimes be useful to treat numeric data as categorical, eg: underweight, normal, obese. This is usually just another kind of binning. It seldom makes sense to consider categorical data as continuous.

1. If years then Discrete and if Days then continuous. 2. Discrete 3. Continous 4. Discrete 5. Continous 6. Continous 7.Discrete 8.Continous 9.Continous

You might also like