STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

) ) Vs Ed

COUNTY OF

CASS

Special Appearance In Pro pria Persona to challenge jurisdiction of agency WithoutPrejudice UCC 1-207. Agency of State is commercial Charter of Maritime jurisdiction; I hereby refute agencyterms of Uniform Commercial Code 3-104 "promise" and reject "unconditional" instruments as "unconscionable" at UCC 2-302. If no contract exists, that was knowingly and willingly signed there can not be an "action" to force acceptance of obligation COMES NOW, EDWARD CURTIS appearing as sovereign, private non-resident, non-domestic, non-person, non individual, specially and not generally or voluntarily but under threat of arrest if failing to do so with this brief covering all charges. I demand ALL my money returned in full and compensation for damages and time wasted. sworn upon the oath of honesty in your own law books. I state my case from the widest perspectives relevant to this case. "...The Honesty Motion represents the evolution to more advanced levels of law and justice -- levels that will I appear pro see being duly

eventually eliminate crimes, wars, and sufferings caused by power usurped through manipulated laws and 'truths. I remain mute beyond these words With express and explicit reservation of all Unalienable, Vested Natural, Inherent, and common Law Rights, whether enumerated or not in the Constitution for the State of North Dakota. That said Ed Curtis. does not spell or capitalize his name any other way, shape or form, and any other spelling or capitalization is a fiction and not me, and must be expunged from the record in this matter, as I have a right to bring this matter in my exact legal appellation. I am NOT welfare enumerated, and not a PERSON, SUBJECT, or CITIZEN within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America, under the separate but equal doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, 16 S.Ct. 1138, 41 L.Ed. 256. AFFIDAVIT OF PROBABLE CAUSE OF MASS CRIMINAL THEFT, extortion, fraud, perfidy, TRESSPASS, sedition,

all the way to high treason from the whole NORTH DAKOTA child support system. This trial is for over $20 and demands a jury trial that is properly instructed in the law to even resemble law. I have met the requirements for my 7th amendment rights per UCC 1-207. I stand as just one pissed off American. Freedom stops when one person attempts to deny another his

natural rights, from this time forward, you will NOT hide behind a word called Government, you stepped out of your office. I want your full name for the record I seek to clear up this matter in the swiftest amount of time.

Petitioner has been unlawfully incarcerated, kidnapped by public officials, falsely arrested without proper warrant on or about 11-08-04, unjustly imprisoned without due process of law, Held for extortion over his will and against his consent and has been unlawfully restrained of his liberty. This is my only warning. DONT TREAD ON ME again. Under VE IT ARMIS, under duress of imprisonment for no crime of mine but of extortion for a fraud labeled as Child Support of an alleged 12

thousand dollars of which I do not nor ever have owed or was obligated to under any contract signed willingly or knowingly by me.. No lawful warrant did issue or was presented at any time to your petitioner by respondents in accordance with the concise rule of law, and as mandated by their oath of office. No supporting affidavits, verification, or pay

subscription nor grand jury indictment as mandated by the concise rule of law was ever used to bring me to trial, in overt contravention to the rule of law, and over my continued objections and against my consent. qualifying signature of Appellant/Petitioner is upon any valid or lawful instrument and/or claim held by respondents in this matter. Affiant files this affidavit because he has probable cause to believe that a major fraud is being committed against the people of the state of NORTH DAKOTA and particularly against Ed Curtis by persons individually and acting in concert whos names I now seek. Has the North Dakota Legislature unlawfully acquiesced or assisted in the No

subjection of the sovereignty of the rightful citizens of North Dakota to the municipal power of the United States Congress (found in Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 17, U.S. Const.) directly be its legislation, or indirectly through agencies created for that purpose, which ultimately led to the unlawful acts and/or omissions of respondents in this matter, and the resultant fraudulent conviction from which your petitioner hereby seeks relief? IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE.

1)

Has your petitioners foundational constitutional right to have a

lawful Bill of Particulars answered as a matter of substantive due process of law in order to inform me of the nature and cause of the accusation been derogated by respondents in this matter by their insolent acts and/or omissions clothed under color of authority, under color of law in direct violation of the concise rule of law? 2) by their various unlawful acts and/or omissions in this matter and unclean hands, base these fraudulent acts and/or omissions based on published Can the respondents in this matter, through the COUNTY OF CASS,

Penal Code 270 Failure to Provide and/or 166(a)(4) Contempt of Court using their positions of power under color of law, and color of authority to use the courts of the COUNTY OF CASS, as an organized crime syndicate in which to usurp your petitioners natural born, common law, constitutional and/or civil rights? 3) Can the respondents in this matter, use an unconscionable

contract, vitiated by fraud by way of inducement; null and void in ab initio, as a foundational basis to use published Penal Code 270 and/or 166(a)(4) under color of law, under color of authority as a basis to usurp your petitioners natural born, common law, constitutional and/or civil rights? 4) Can the respondents in this matter, use the socialist doctrine

(and/or Feminist Doctrine) In the Best Interests of the Child as a supporting basis in which to usurp and controvert the concise rule of law, to the detriment of your petitioner; as enumerated by the Constitution

for the state of NORTH DAKOTA, and/or the Constitution for the united States 5) Has the STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA and/or respondents in this matter

violated the concise rule of law and your petitioners natural born, common law, constitutional, and/or civil rights by derogating the concise rule of law to obtain Title IV-D Welfare remuneration scams and/or schemes? 6) Can the respondents in this matter, through the by their various unlawful acts and/or omissions in this matter and unclean hands, base these fraudulent acts and/or omissions based on published Penal Code 270 Failure to Provide and/or 166(a)(4) Contempt of Court using their positions of power under color of law, and color of authority to use the courts of the COUNTY OF CASS, as an organized crime syndicate in which to usurp your petitioners natural born, common law, constitutional and/or civil rights? 7) Has the respondents the enumerated authority to prosecute an action without grand jury indictment against your petitioner in direct COUNTY OF CASS,

insolence and arrogance to the respondents oath of office, and in direct violation to the concise rule of law as enumerated and mandated by the Constitution of the United States (1787-1791), 8) Can the STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA and/or respondents in this matter

prosecute a matter in the courts of NORTH DAKOTA without lawful jurisdiction? 9) Have the respondents the enumerated authority under the concise

rule of law as mandated by the Constitution of the United States (1787-1791) to arrest your petitioner without a lawful warrant? cause? Not supported by affidavits? With no Governors Warrant? In direct Without probable

contravention to their oaths of office and the aforementioned concise rule of law?? 10) When has NORTH DAKOTA and/or respondents agreed to the

foundational precepts of feminism over the concise rule of law as established and enumerated by the Constitution for the state of NORTH DAKOTA, and/or the Constitution for the united States (1787-1791) and your petitioners natural

born, common law, constitutional, and/or civil rights? 11) Can Respondents be bought off by Federal funding; State funding,

and/or third party funding(s); whose sole intent is to impress an oppression against we the people in order that they may get financial remunerations from or by or through direct or indirect Title 42 U.S.C. Section 651-666 Title IV-D welfare funding? 12) Article I, Section 1 that All men are by nature free and independent and have certain inalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty; acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; and pursing and obtaining safety and happiness, been usurped in favor of respondents acts and/or omissions committed under color of law and under color of authority? Constitution, which was founded upon the concise principle under

BE WARNED 13) 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officers judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this

section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights (3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; or if two or more persons conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of the United States; or to injure any citizen

in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.

Private Re-Affirmation of Oath of Office and Security Agreement Notice of Felony

(To protect unalienable rights - non-statutory) Serial Number: _____________________ WARNING: If you do not understand your rights, or my rights, pursuant to this agreement, then you are hereby advised to consult with competent legal counsel. I, ____________________________, individually and as a public or private officer, employee, or official of (employer's name)________________________________, do solemnly swear, affirm, and attest under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America (Title 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1746), that I will support the Constitution for the united States of America and the Constitution for the ____________________ republic, and all the laws promulgated thereunder in conformance with the Constitution for the united States of America and the above named republic, and will extend and protect the unalienable rights, benefits, and privileges contained therein to the undersigned Accommodation Party, and will

faithfully perform all the duties of my office as it relates to the undersigned Accommodation Party in compliance with the above Constitutions to which I acknowledge that I have already taken an oath to perform said acts and actions to the best of my ability. That I, have knowledge that under Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1986, that failure to extend or protect any unalienable rights secured by the above named Constitutions and failure to correct any violations of said unalienable rights brought to My attention is a civil rights violation actionable against Me under Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1985 as a cause of action and under Title 42, Sec. 1983 as a right of action. That furthermore, I am aware that if I fail to sign this Oath of Office, as it applies to the undersigned Accommodation Party, and if I violate the Accommodation Party's unalienable rights secured thereby, or fail to take corrective action if other persons known to Me violate said rights, that I can be charged with the Federal Crime of "Perjury of Oath of Office", since I am presumed to have already taken an oath of office to protect rights secured under the above named Constitutions, as set forth under Title 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1621, which

carries a five year felony prison sentence and a $2,000.00 fine, under Title 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1746, or both, and that I will be liable personally to the Accommodation Party for civil damages in the amount of one million dollars in silver coin for each count of said violation. That I am aware that if I conspire with another to violate the rights of the Accomodation Party, that under Title 18 U.S.C. Sec. 241 I may be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both, and if death results, I shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life. That I know that I have no immunities against said charges. That I am aware that this "Oath of Office" is a private security agreement with the Accommodation Party, that it is enforceable in a court of Common Law venue. That if I should fail to sign said agreement and then commit, or witness the commission of a willful violation of the Accommodation Party's rights, then the Accommodation Party may sign on my behalf, and that said violation shall be a prima facie cause of action when placed into the common law.

OPEN LETTER TO PUBLIC SERVANTS

At the expense of the American people and with the blessings of unseen hands at high policy-making levels, you have created a subculture for yourselves we will call the bureaucratic class. There are millions of you now and, as of 2002, the bureaucratic class has near carte blanche authority to do anything it wants to the American people. It's as if you and your classmates are blessed with some magic shield that protects you from being held personally accountable for the damage you have inflicted upon the very people who have afforded your existence. You have been used by those unseen hands to morally, spiritually, economically and politically bankrupt the people of this nation. The bureaucratic class in the United States has been growing steadily since the New Deal. From the humble beginnings of a few scattered overworked and underpaid public servants providing government services from impromptu field

offices have sprung legions of high-paid bureaucrats with well-staffed offices centralized in government-owned complexes. The bureaucratic class has forgotten its service-based roots and has come to regard its protected-class status as a birthright. Members of the bureaucratic class make comparatively high-end wages that come with comparatively elaborate benefits packages and the ability to charge many of life's expenses to the American people. Over and above all holidays off with pay, you accumulate sick time, vacation time and are allowed to take x number of personal days off each year -- with pay. No such largesse exists in the private sector as we must work almost half the year just to pay for you. While we have grudgingly afforded you these things with only moderate protest, you have been enforcing upon us increasingly invasive, injurious and absurdist policies. If we complain and attempt to seek a redress of our grievances for your abusive conduct through agency superiors, congresspersons or the courts, we are denied. You are immune from prosecution while functioning in your official capacity -- even if you act abusively or beyond the scope of your

authority. With increased wages, increased benefits, increased authority has come prosecutorial immunity so airtight you may wrongfully imprison and murder ordinary people without fear of repercussion. You have all of these things going for you and the law on your side so you must be doing the right thing, you rationalize. How else could you be allowed to steal the property, the children, the freedom and the life from people you must know in your heart do not deserve your bureaucratic wrath? The ends must justify the means, you assuredly tell yourselves while drowning your conscience in alcohol or medicating it with Prozac. Look around you. As bureaucrats who enforce policies that tie ordinary people up into frustrated statutory knots, how many of them appreciate you? How many ordinary people are happy to see you compared to the ones who are barely able to contain the contempt your mere presence in their lives causes them to feel? How many lives have been improved through the functions of your office compared to the lives that have been destroyed by it? Would you

say that over the last several years angry and destroyed people are beginning to drastically outnumber happy and improved people? Is that why many of you now address the public from behind bullet-proof glass and metal detectors? There is an undercurrent of frustration in this country. Things are not going well for ordinary people because their lives are being taxed and regulated out of existence. Right now most people must content themselves to burden their friends and family members with their frustration because there is no other outlet for their emotions. But, what would happen if the magic shield that has protected you and your classmates is removed? Your protection is not divine. It is the construct of men. As easily as it has been given to you it can be taken away. Have you read the news lately? Enron, the lynx hair fraud, no scientific foundation for cutting off irrigation water to protect Klamath Basin suckerfish last year: Your protection is being removed. The bureaucratic class has been set up to take the fall for a failed society. And, in apparent anticipation of imminent chaos, the Bush administration announced Feb. 3, 2002, that soon it will appoint a four-star

general to command the American theater of operations for the Homeland Security Agency. Here is the scenario to which you must take heed: The hand that provided immunity to the bureaucratic class while it bankrupted the people of a nation is lifted. Media-triggered events expose the abusive actions of the bureaucratic class to the masses. The masses identify those in the bureaucratic class as the real cause of their misery and frustration and stop beating their children and spouses. Thousands of government offices are suddenly vacated as bureaucrats flee them in fear of their lives or are otherwise prevented from performing their duties. The structure of government begins to collapse. A power vacuum is created. Homeland Security steps in to administrate our socio/political unraveling as a nation. The general is commissioned to call out the armed forces and take military control of our domestic affairs. Think about it. The description of the bureaucratic class and what it has done to the American people with murderous immunity cannot be disputed. The scenario above is not unprecedented in recent world history. It also cannot be

disputed that, by enjoying the benefits of your class in trade for willingly and knowingly damaging innocent people, you have betrayed them. While worthy adversaries may respect one another, no one respects a traitor. *** The purpose of this letter is to inform members of the bureaucratic class that it was created to perform a task that has been accomplished; you are now as expendable as us ordinary folks whose ranks you are about to rejoin. You have been used to destroy the people of this nation. Immunity for your lifestyle is evaporating. You have been positioned as an outlet for the prodigious anger and frustration that enforcement of increasingly injurious and absurd policies has generated in the people who have paid your wages. The only question remaining is, what are you going to do about it? Don Harkins The Idaho Observer

NOTICE

ATTENTION: "PUBLIC SERVANTS"

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT: On December 23, 1913 the United States Congress passed the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT and by that committed the greatest act of TREASON in U.S. history. It surrendered the nation's sovereignty and sold the American people into slavery to a cabal of arch-charlatan bankers who proceeded to plunder, bankrupt, and conquer this nation with a MONEY SWINDLE. The "money" the banks issue is merely bookkeeping entries. It costs them nothing and is not backed by their wealth, efforts, property, or risk. It is not redeemable except in more DEBT paper. The Federal Reserve Act forced us to pay compound interest on thin air. We now use worthless "NOTES" backed by our own credit that we cannot own and are made subject to compelled performance for the "PRIVILEGE." From 1913 until 1933 the U.S. paid "interest" with more and more gold. The structured inevitability soon transpired - the Treasury of the United States' government was empty, the debt was greater than ever, and the

U.S. declared bankruptcy. In exchange for using notes belonging to bankers who create them out of NOTHING on our credit, we are forced to repay in substance (labor, property, land, businesses, resources - life) in ever-increasing amounts. This IS the GREATEST HEIST AND FRAUD of all time. When a government goes bankrupt, it loses its sovereignty. In 1933 the U.S. declared bankruptcy, as expressed in Roosevelt's Executive Order 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260, House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933, confirmed in Perry v. U.S., (1935) 294 U.S. 330, 381; 79 L.ED. 912, also 31 USC 5112, 5119 and 12 USC 95a. The bankrupt U.S. went into receivership, reorganized in favor of 115 creditors and new owners. In 1913, congress turned over America lock, stock and barrel to a handful of criminals whose avowed intent from the beginning was to plunder, bankrupt, conquer and enslave the people of the united States of America and eliminate the nation from the face of the earth. The goal was, and is, to absorb America into a one-world privately owned

commercial government. A "NEW WORLD ORDER." With the Erie R.R. v. Thompkins case of 1938 the Supreme Court confirmed their success. We are now in an international private commercial jurisdiction in colorable admiralty-maritime under the Law Merchant. We have been conned and betrayed out of our sovereignty, rights, property, freedom, common law, Article III courts, and our REPUBLIC. The Bill of Rights has been statutized into "civil rights" in commerce. America has been stolen. We have been made slaves, i.e., permanent debtors, bankrupt, in legal incapacity, rendered commercial "person", residents and corporate franchisees know as "citizens of the United States" under the so-called "14th Amendment," which was never ratified - see Congressional Record, June 12, 1967; Dvett v. Turner (1968) 439 P.2d 266; State v. Phillips, (1975)(affirmed) and created a citizenship for corporations (abstract) statutory entities, which are the products and definitions of the legislature and are fully taxable and regulatable thereby. Thomas Jefferson's prophecy came to pass: "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of currency ... the banks ... will

deprive the people of all property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." Since 1933 what is called the "United States' Government" is a privately owned corporation of the Federal Reserve System/IMF. It is merely an instrument by which the banksters administer their ongoing rape of human freedom. All "public servants," officials, congressmen, politicians, judges, attorneys, law enforcement, States and their various agencies, teachers, etc., are the express agents of these "Foreign Principals*" who have stolen the country by clever, intentional, and unrelenting fraud, trickery, treachery, non-disclosure, misrepresentation, intrigue, coercion, conspiracy, murder, etc.. * See Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938; 22 USC 286 et seq. 263a, 185g, 267j; 611(c)(ii) & (iii); Treasury Delegation Order #91. An insidious aspect of this is that "officials" like you may think you are "public servants," or upholding the "law," or other hoaxes. In truth you are conscientiously and assiduously serving the archenemies of yourselves, your rights, your fellow citizens, continued human rights and life and

freedom in general. YOU are seditiously administering the plunder, bankruptcy, impoverishment and injury to human life based upon crimes and lies of such magnitude, depth, and proportions as to be beyond human comprehension. By so doing, you are committing TREASON AND PERFIDY so immense as "to make the angels weep." If you and your fellow "officials" do not understand the real situation you are ignorant, naive, deceived and conned. You are sheer dupes. If you do know and are parties to it you are guilty of evil and heinous "betrayal." You are in such case TRAITORS AND CRIMINALS. This invalidates your "authority" and renders NULL AND VOID absolutely, all moral obligation to pay allegiance or to obey the TREASONOUS SYSTEM you enforce with such mechanical avariciousness, viciousness and malice aforethought. If, You, "public servants" have any shred of humanity, awe, heart, clarity, sanity, access to your true being and conscience left, you would instantly resign and do everything possible to inform the American people of their

plight and help us retrieve our rights and our country. Only by such means can you even begin to atone for your endless crimes against humanity and the lives you so arrogantly and mindlessly butcher with the "meat-grinder of the law." You DID NOT CREATE the lives you "legally" assault. They DO NOT belong to you. Ignorance of the law (moral and natural law) is no excuse. You CANNOT engage in bringing harm to life, and like the Nazi's defense at Nuerenberg claim that you were simply doing your duty and following orders. Moral and natural law are NOT obviated by ignorance, hubris and self-righteous militancy. Your entire system - from ground up - is DECEIT AND FRAUD. It is illicit in essence and ab initio. As Broom's Maxims 297, 729 put it: "A right of action cannot arise out of fraud." Honor is earned by honesty and integrity, not under false and fraudulent pretenses. The color of the cloth one wears cannot cover up the usurpations, lies and treachery. "When black

is fraudulently declared to be white, not all will live in darkness." More people are awakening to the truth. What do you think the American people will do as they discover that they have no more country, that they are slaves to mortal enemies, that they have been tricked and betrayed by their "leaders" who sold them out? What do you think they will do when they realize that all their so-called "public servants" are willing or stupidly compliant parties to the plunder, subjugation and ruin of their lives and country? Thomas Jefferson wrote: "An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens." Lincoln said: "Just as I would not be a slave, neither would I be a master." I will NOT participate in your corrupt, arrant and cruel FRAUD, either as perpetrator nor victim. The great Indian poet Tagore wrote: "Power takes as ingratitude the writhing of its victim." I will no longer sit here and writhe. The TYRANNY over this nation MUST END!

If you continue with this course, you will have natural and moral law and higher powers to answer to, not to mention all those you have wronged under the color of law. You also, will have your own laws turned against you, as you have turned the law against us. To transform the shield of protection into a sword of exploitation, subjugation and plunder is PERFIDY. You have now been NOTICED. All further actions on your part will be willful.

DATED this ______ day of _____________, _______ _____________________________________ An American who demands his country back

The Constitution of the Universe (1976) *The purpose of conscious life is to live creatively, happily,

eternally. *The function of government is to provide the conditions that let individuals fulfill that purpose. The Constitution of the Universe

guarantees those conditions by forbidding the use of initiatory force, fraud, or coercion by any person or group against any individual. Article 1 No person, group of persons, or government shall initiate force, threat of force, or fraud against any individual's self or property. Article 2 Force is morally-and-legally justified only for protection from those who violate Article 1. Article 3 No exceptions shall exist for Articles 1 and 2. * * * Premises *Values exist only relative to life. Whatever benfits to that organism. *Whatever harms a living organism is a disvalue to that organism. nism is a value

* Immoral actions arise (1) from individuals who harm others through force, fraud, or coercion and (2) from individuals who usurp, degrade, or

destroy values created or earned by others. * Moral actions arise from individuals who honestly create and competitively produce values to benefit self, others, and society.

Fully Informed Jury Flyer It's extremely unlikely the judge will tell you this, because the law doesn't require it. Instead, expect the judge to tell you that you may consider "only the facts" of the case and you are not to let your conscience, your opiinion of the law, or the defendant's motives affect your decision. Many people don't get fair trials. Too often, jurors actually end up apologizing to the person they've convicted - or to the community for acquitting when the evidence clearly established guilt. Something is definitely wrong when jurors feel badly about their verdict. They should never be ashamed of their decision, or explain " I wanted to vote my conscience, but the judge said we had to apply the law as it was given to us, like it or not." Most Americans are aware of their right to trial by jury, but how many

know that the jury has more power than anyone else in the courtroom - and that in pursuit of a just verdict, jurors are free to judge the merits of the law itself, its use in the case at hand, or the motives of the accused. If jurors were supposed to judge "only the facts", their job could be done by a computer. It is precisely because people have opinions, wisdom, experience, and conscience that we depend on jurors, not machines, to judge court cases. In a trial by jury, the judge's job is to referee the trial and provide neutral legal advice to the jury, but judges rarely advise jurors of their rights. And judges are not supposed to dismiss prospective jurors because they admit having qualms with the law, or know about their right to judge the law and its application. But such dismissals are routine. We can only speculate on why: disrespect for the vital concept of "government of, by and for the people?" Unwillingness to part with their powers? Ignorance of jurors rights? (Yes, some judges do not even know about

the rights of jurors.) Worse, many judges and prosecutors, apparently anxious to reassure the public that they stand for law and order, do their best to select jurors they know from prior experience to be "conviction prone." Then the judge (wrongly) "instructs" them that they must reach a unanimous decision, and soon, to avoid "overburdening the taxpayers." Jurors are very rarely informed they may vote according to conscience, even after swearing to "apply the law as given" - or told that it's better to "hang" the jury than to violate one's conscience in order to reach consensus. These are some of the reasons FIJA was formed. FIJA stands for Fully Informed Jury Association. We are a network of jury-rights activists and groups. Our current project is also known as FIJA, the Fully Informed Jury Act or Amendment. As law, FIJA would require that trial judges resume the former practice of telling jurors about their right to judge both law and fact regarding each and every charge against a defendant. We want the judge, like everyone else

in the courtroom, to tell the whole truth and nothing but. Yes, it was normal in the early days of our nation and before, in colonial times. America's founders realized that trials by juries of ordinary people, fully aware of their rights as jurors, would be essential to preservation of our freedom. As long as juries had the final say on the laws of the land, the government would remain the servant, not the master, of the people. Our third president, Thomas Jefferson, put it like this: "I consider trial by jury as the only anchor yet imagined by man by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution." John Adams, our second president, had this to say about the juror: "It is not only his right, but his duty...to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgement, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court." Yes. Only decades had passed since the freedom of the press was established in the colonies when a jury decided John Peter Zenger was "not guilty"

of seditious libel. He was charged with this crime for printing true, but damaging, news stories about the Royal Governor of New York Colony. "Truth is no defense", the court told the jury! But the jury decided to reject bad law, and acquitted. Why? Because defense attorney Andrew Hamilton informed the jury of its rights: he told the story of William Penn's trial - of the courageous London jury which refused to find him guilty of preaching what was then an illegal religion (Quakerism). His jurors stood by their verdict even though they were held without food, water, or toilet facilities for four days. They were then fined and imprisoned for acquitting Penn - until England's highest court acknowledged their right to reject both law and fact, and to find a verdict according to conscience. It was exercise of that right in the Penn trial which eventually led to recognotion of free speech, religious freedom, amd peaceable assembly as individual rights. American colonists regularly depended on juries to thwart bad law sent over from England. The British then restricted trial by jury and other

rights which juries had helped secure. Result? The Declaration of Independence and the American Revolution! Afterwards, to protect the rights they'd fought for from future attack, the Founders of the new nation placed trial by jury - meaning tough, fully informed juries - in both the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Bad law - special-interest legislation which tramples our rights - is no longer sent here from Britain. But our own legislatures keep us well supplied... Now, more than ever, we need juries to protect us! In the 1890's, powerful special-interest pressures inspired a series of judicial decisions which tried to limit jury rights. While no court has yet dared to deny that juries can "nullify" or "veto" a law, or "bring in a general verdict", some - hypocritically - have held that jurors need not be told their rights! That is why it is nowadays a rare and courageous attorney who will risk being cited for contmpt of court for informing the jury of its rights without obtaining the judge's prior approval. It's also why the idea of jury rights is not taught in (government) schools. PRESS RELEASE

Child Support SystemDeclared UnconstitutionalMinnesota Supreme Court upholds ruling In 1975, Congress passed a law which included a last minute

amendment to create the Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE). When signing the bill, then President Ford commented that it took the federal government too far into domestic relations and promised to propose legislation to correct the problem. Over the decade that followed, it became clear that OCSE intended to grow in size and power to control all aspects of child support law, seizing that power from the state courts. The size of the OCSE grew, this decade acquiring a staff in excess of 50,000 and costing taxpayers some $3 billion annually. Child support laws were modified, so that simple mathematical formulae are used to make award decisions. This new simplicity is required due to the low level of education of workers who are assigned as "judges" in child support cases. Extreme consequences defined by

new federal laws, often carried out automatically and without trial, give the child support enforcement agency power over tens of millions of individuals that surpasses anything previously seen in the United States. After almost 25 years since its start, judges in Minnesota finally felt that they had seen enough. In June of last year, the Court of Appeals decided that the administrative branch of government had exceeded its constitutional powers. The administrative child support process created by Minn. Stat. 518.5511 (1996) violates the separation of powers doctrine by infringing on the district court's original jurisdiction, by creating a tribunal which is not inferior to the district court, and by permitting child support officers to practice law. Therefore, the statute is unconstitutional." (STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT C7-97-926 C8-97-1132 C9-98-33 C7-97-1512, PRESS RELEASE

Georgia Superior Court Judge Declares States Child Support Guidelines to be Unconstitutional

On February 25, 2002, a courageous Superior Court Judge in the Alapaha Judicial Circuit, by the name of C. Dane Perkins, granted the motion of Michelle L. Sweat, which declared the Georgia Child Support Guidelines to be null and void as the guidelines violate numerous provisions of the constitutions of both the United States and the State of Georgia. Michelle Sweat was divorced on November 12, 1998, and had agreed to allow the father to have custody of the three minor children of the parties while she received visitation, and a provision of the agreement of the parties was that she not be obligated to pay child support. On or about July 14, 2000, * v. 127 * MICHELLE L. SWEAT And SAMUEL SWEAT, SR. * * * * * CIVIL ACTION NO. 2000 C

Defendants

ORDER DECLARING GEORGIAS CHILD SUPPORT GUIDELINES VOID AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION

TINA SULLINS WILSON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CASE NO. DR-97-502272.03-C

DREW CARSON WILSON,

Defendant. _______________________________

Before the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama Honorable Rosemary deJuan Chambers, Circuit Court Judge

AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

FOR

FATHERS ON BEHALF OF DREW CARSON WILSON

IN REGARD TO ISSUES OF PARENTAL ALIENATION AND PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME

Bruce Eden Constitutional Rights Director NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR FATHERS Eastern Office P.O. Box 4075 Wayne, New Jersey 07474 (973)-616-9558

Sixth Circuit rules federal child support act unconstitutional. Trial; January 1, 2001; Magnuson, Carolyn ... ruled the federal Child Support Recovery Act (CSRA) is unconstitutional. The CSRA ... ruling's impact on child support collection efforts is unclear, as even ... advocacy group for child support workers. This is a tool of last ...

New york

A U.S. district court in New York has held that the Child Support Recovery Act (CSRA) violates the Tenth Amendment because it exceeds Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce. The statute imposes criminal sanctions on noncustodial parents who have willfully failed to make court-ordered support payments for their children living in another state. (United States v. King, No. S1 00 CR. 653 (RWS), 2001 WL 111278 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 2001).) A U.S. district court in New York has held that the Child Support Recovery Act (CSRA) violates the Tenth Amendment because it exceeds Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce. The statute imposes criminal sanctions on noncustodial parents who have willfully failed to make court-ordered support payments for their children living in another state. (United States v. King, No. S1 00 CR. 653 (RWS), 2001 WL 111278 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 2001).)

14. CASE

MISSOURI'S SYSTEM FOR CHILD SUPPORT RULINGS IS CHALLENGED IN

STATE SUPREME COURT HEARS ARGUMENTS

PLEASE FORWARD TO ALL CONCERNED AMERICANS, YOUR NEIGHBORS AND FRIENDS!!! *****************************************************************

North Dakota Officials Dissolve State

Dickinson, N.D. -City, county, and state officials failed to appear at a scheduled news conference Friday in response to a demand that representatives of the law, Constitution, and People of North Dakota appear, explain their positions, and arrange settlement in their default of a decade long civil racketeering and torture case. The announcement was distributed twice, Wednesday and Thursday, to the White House, Congress, FBI, Justice Department, state and federal officials, media, and American citizens. "Officials or their representatives clearly had another reasonable opportunity to show up and demonstrate who's in charge here," said independent federal prosecutor Michael Nowik of Dickinson, who called the news conference to have officials appear in public, end their constant threats to his life,

Closing statement: A much better world is on the way because of your actions. I seek A world were everyone is prosperous and happy. YOU are directly stopping that for all. 100s of friends and allies received my case today via e-mail and I will fill in the blanks with real peoples names. Look up Honesty* Justice* Freedom on a google search. Follow the links. I seek justice and that means smashing all illusions and exposing the thieves that dare tread on me. The bigger the pot the better! You have been lured into a P.H. Products trap. I was waiting for you! I want to know your name and witch side you are on for the record. Write me, phproducts123@hotmail.com tell me about

your self. Ask to review my plans before I launch them, ask for your name to be removed and answer why it should be? Write me and Learn what thousands of others have and will when they receive the e- mail about this international incident! Your name will appear in other ways if this does not end here and now. All the way to the hall of shame if you desire! Your name will be On my writ of habitus corpus if needed, On my charges filed if necessary, or ??? I trained well in taking this country back for Shawn and Ashleys future. I do care, you didnt. I need no gun. This is a silent war of words and exposure. In my own silly way, I will help bring our future to all for a broken taillight? I Will defend myself and add you to the P.H. game. I am NOT relying on my knowledge of your I will not fight my case as a sucker to your rules but as a terror to you terrorist who tread on America. People are dieing in the name of freedom and color of law System.

you sit here stealing it?

America has been destroyed, Stolen from me,

Ashley, and everyones future. NO ONE EVEN KNOWS IT, but the battle is almost over, you lost. Your every attack will back fire, be documented and published for all. I am forced to work twice as long earning a living to pay your way. WHY should I be afraid of the people I pay to protect MY freedoms? If you are not protecting my freedom you are a parasite on me and all America and will face honest justice, You are a traitor to your Country and will be exposed Like a child molester. More and more are waking to the truth, you have molested a nation. I am acting for Ashleys best interest and her future. I will push this case till you shoot me dead and Show your only real power or dismissal, PAID IN FULL by you and your class mates in crime. you can destroy me, not the truth. I seek dismissal and full damages of $150,000 from the state of Washington. And $25,000 by the state of North Dakota paid to The real victims of this fraud. Ashley and Shawn. I also seek all money stolen from

me returned in full. I will pursue justice until this is solved, You tread on me. The Sheriffs of the State of North Dakota will be directed to take the above named persons into custody. If this matter is not settled by 2005. YOU dragged me into this and you deserve no mercy from the truth FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT

__________________ (__________) Before me, the undersigned authority, did personally appear in court personally and known to be the person described above who acknowledged that he did in fact prepare the foregoing document under his own free will this 18th day of November 2004. __________________________________