Professional Documents
Culture Documents
--- industrys perspective --Nuclear Operating Organizations Cooperation Forum Vienna, September 18, 2012 Takuya HATTORI JAIF
The Gov. of Japan (Jul.2012) The National Diet of Japan (Jul.2012) Rebuild. JN. Initiative Found. (Feb.2012) TEPCO (Jun.2012) Gov. Report to IAEA (Jun./Sep.2011) NISA Report (Feb.2012) USNRC (Jul.2011) JANTI (Oct.2011) INPO (Nov.2011, Aug.2012) ASME (Jun.2012) AESJ (2013)
2
Independent Investigation Commission, established by the National Diet of Japan chaired by Dr. Kurokawa
Recommendations of the Official Report (July 2012) Monitoring of the nuclear regulatory body by the National Diet Reform the crisis management system Government responsibility for public health and welfare Monitoring the operators Criteria for the new regulatory body Reforming laws related to nuclear energy Develop a system of independent investigation commissions
4
The cause of the accident is not inevitable results of Nuclear Power technology itself, but inevitable results of management system.
Institutional defect / Lack of imagination
insufficient robustness and preparations ; - design height of tsunami - prolonged SBO - loss of UHS - SA in multi-units - emergency preparedness etc.
Lessons learned
Robustness of design Emergency preparedness Management system Information release Safety culture Recurrence of such severe situation could
8
Source: Cabinet Secretariat, Government of Japan
Current Status of the Nuclear Power Plants in Japan (as of August 31, 2012)
: Inoperation (2 unit,2.36GWe) :Outagefortheperiodicinspection (35units,30.61GWe) :Shutdownduetotsunami andandthegovernmentrequest (13units,13.18GWe) TOTAL:50 units,46.15 GWe
Abolished
10
April 2012
as of Aug.2012
Evacuees (persons) Appx.58,000 Appx.48,000 August 2012 Area 1: Areas to which evacuation orders are ready to be lifted Area 2: Areas in which residents are not permitted to live Area 3: Areas where it is expected that residents will face difficulties in returning for a long time 11
Source: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, etc
Rearrangement of the areas of evacuation2012.3) -- Annual integral dose Area 1: < 20mSv/y Area 2: > 20mSv/y Area 3: > 50mSv/y where the cumulative dose is expected to be > 20mSv/y within 5 years
12
Decontamination(2)
13
14
- Decommissioning of damaged reactors safely - Enhancing the safety of world nuclear power system based
technology from many countries even after the Fukushima Accident Development of advanced reactor with inherent safety
16
- Sharing the lessons learned and enhance safety of world nuclear installations - Focusing on reassurance of public confidence and trust - Improving literacy on radiation - Promoting R&D on decommissioning of Fukushima as an international project
17
19