Nov.

29-30 , 2010 1

2010 Conference on Teaching Excellence

Student Engagement

High-impact practices

Academic Behavior Confidence Scale

1-4

20002005
2007

2004

2005b

2008b

1999Astin, 1993
2006

2006102007
87
80
78

2828
43

2007

2008a

2009

2009
PascarellaTerenzini1991

Astin
1993

learning
engagement
NSSENational Survey of Student
EngagementKuh2008a

...
Fletcher,2005,2007HarperQuaye,
2009

Nov. 29-30 , 2010 2

2010 Conference on Teaching Excellence

Student Engagement

94

self-efficacyBandura1977

Bandura1986

SanderSanders2003
Academic Behavioral Confidence

Sander
Sanders, 2009

Sander Sanders,
2009SanderSanders

2007
College
Student Experiences QuestionnaireCSEQ

()
()
()

()

engagement

Krause, 2005, p.3

learning engagement
KearsleyShneiderman1999Cocea
2007

KuhKinzieSchuhWhitt2005

Astin1991
I-E-O model

Pascarella Terenzini
1991, 2005

2006

2006
Coates2008b
value- added

Coates, 2008a

Nov. 29-30 , 2010 3

2010 Conference on Teaching Excellence

Coates, 2008b

Fletcher, 2007Kuh
2008
Pascarella
Terenzini2005, p.602

Krause, 2005

(Astin, 1993; Pascarella

& Terenzini, 1991; Pace, 1980sKuh et al., 2005)

Fletcher, 2007
1999
National Survey of Student Engagement, NSSE

Kuh, 2001

Handelsman, Briggs, Sullivan, Towler, 2005

Ahlfeldt,
Mehta, Sellnow , 2005
Kuh,
2001Kuh2008b
High-impact practices

Kuh2005

Kuh,
2008b

McNaught, Leung, Kember, 2006

19992000

20
2007

1989

Sander
Sanders, 2003

Sander
Sanders, 2009

SanderSanders, 2003, p.4

SanderSanders, 2009
BanduraSelf
efficacy theorySanderStevensonKingCoates
2000Sander
Sanders, 2003

Bandura, 1986,1997

Bandura,1977
(efficacy expectancy)(outcome expectancy)
1200 Bandura, 1977
Student Engagement Questionnaire,
SEQ
Australian Council for Educational Research,
ACER
Coates, 2008a (Bandura, 1997)
University Grants Committee of Hong Kong
2006
(Bandura, 1997)SanderSanders2003

Nov. 29-30 , 2010 4

2010 Conference on Teaching Excellence

Sander2000

Eccles Adler
FutternanGoffKaczalaMeeceMidgley1983
expectation-value theory

Eccles et at., 1983; Wigfield &Eccles, 2002

Eccles
1983

Sander Sanders,
2009

805
SPSS

4-1
4-1

3.36
3.17
3.26
3.39
3.35

3.23
3.00
3.16
3.51
3.19

2.48
2.28
2.51
2.53
2.55

3.21
3.27
3.41
3.23
3.01

3.52
3.37
3.48
3.51
3.67

4-1
2.48
2.28
4-2

14
53

18.7
70.7

30
33

40
44

40

53.3

39

52

10

13.3

19

25.3

35
2
9

46.7
2.7
12

34
21
19

45.3
28
25.3

17

22.7

30

40

4-3

80

Likert

SanderSanders
2009
Likert

14
7

8
10

11
13

10

15

15

19
9
13

8
8
7

6
3
15

15
9
15

11

16

11

17

2
13

4-2

4-3

Nov. 29-30 , 2010 5

2010 Conference on Teaching Excellence

4-4

Scheffe

21.554

.000

15.538

.000

p0.05

4-4

3.38

3.13

3.39

3.10

3.08

3.02

3.13

2.82

3.23

3.00

3.36

3.17

3.58

3.47

3.52

3.18

3.48

3.03

3.49

3.23

4-7

4-8

4-4

1
4-5 t

37
38
37
38

134.86
142.11
54.08
57.18

11.008
12.089
6.029
6.264

2.710

.008

2.185

.032

p0.05

4-5

2
4-6

ANOVA

.581

.743

.000

.362

Scheffe

1.495

.223

5.909

.001

p0.05

4-6

3
4-7

ANOVA

**

.647

.001
.392

**

.440

.126

.211

.144

.282
*
.469

.070

.217

.217

.039

.062
*
.405

.000

**

**

.000
*
.329

.239

.165

.001

.000

.004

.157

.000

.202

.241

.295

.246

.102

.083

.037

.010

.034

.385

p0.05

4-8

4-9

**

-.038

.631**

.000

p0.05

4-9

2.48

2010 Conference on Teaching Excellence

2003

PascarellaTerenzini, 1991

SanderSanders2009
3.63
3.183.674.43

19922003

REFERENCES
[1] 2009

Nov. 29-30 , 2010 6

219-13
[2] 2003
122123-136
[3] 1992
1152235-2341
[4] 2007
-
48-55
[5] 2005
29-38
[6] 2009
2019-21.
[7] 2003
NSC91-2413-H-007-003
[8] 1999.
[9] 1989
[10] 2000
9161-200
[11] 2006
50-71
[12] 2008a
431-20
[13] 2008b
159-14.
[14] 2000
8417-32
[15] 2007
523
91-114
[16] 20062

[17] 2007
-39-41
.
[18] Ahlfeldt, S., Mehta, S., Sellnow, T.(2005).Measurement and
analysis of student engagement in university classes where
varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in
use .Higher Education Research & Development. 24 (1), 5-20.
[19] Astin, A. W. (1991). What really matters in general education:

Provocative findings from a national study of student

outcomes. Address presented at the Association of General and
liberal Studies Meeting, Seattle.
[20] Astin, A.W.(1993). What matters in college? Four critical
years revisited. San FranciscoJossey-Bass.
[21] Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory . New York: General
Learning Press.
[22] Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action .
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[23] Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.
New York: W.H. Freeman.
[24] Coates, H.(2008a). Attracting, engaging and retaining: New
conversations about learning. Australasian Student
Engagement Report Australasian Survey of Student Engagement.
Australian Council for
Educational Research. Available:
http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/AUSSE_ASER-Report.pdf
[25] Coates, H.(2008b).Whats the difference? Models for
assessing quality and value added in higher education.
Available: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/4/1/41319232.pdf
[26] Cocea, M.(2007). Learning engagement: What actions of
learners could best predict itAvailabl e:
http://www.dcs.bbk.ac.uk/~mihaela/publications/2007/AIED2
007.pdf

2010 Conference on Teaching Excellence

[27] Fletcher, A. (2005). Guide to students as partners in school
change. Available: http://www.soundout.org/MSIGuide.pdf
[28] Fletcher,
A.(2007).Defining
student engagement: A
literature
review.
Available:
http://www.soundout.org/student-engagement-AF.pdf
[29] Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., &Towler, A.
(2005). A measure of college student course engagement.
Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-191.
[30] Kearsley, G., Shneiderman, B. (1999). Engagement theory: A
framework for technology-based teaching and learning.
Available: http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm
[31] Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student
learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement.
Change, 3(3), 10-17,66.
[32] Kuh, G. D. (2008a). F: Promoting engagement for all students:
The imperative to look within. Available:
http://nsse.iub.edu/NSSE%5F2008%5FResults/docs/withhold/N
SSE2008_Results_revised_11-14-2008.pdf
[33] Kuh, G. D. (2008b). High-impact educational practices: What
they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. AAC&U,
Washington, D.C.
[34] Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J. , Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E.
J.(2005).Assessing conditions to enhance educational

effectiveness: The inventory for student engagement and

success. San FranciscoJossey-Bass.
[35] Pace, C.R. (1980). Measuring the quality of student effort.
Current Issues in Higher Education, 2, 10-16.
[36] Pascarella, E. T. & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college

affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of

research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[37] Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How college
affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
[38] Sander
P., Stevenson
K., King
M., Coates
D.
(2000).University
Students'
Expectations
of
Teaching .Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 309-323.
[39] Sander ,P. Sanders, L.(2003). Measuring confidence in
academic study: A summary report. Electronic Journal of
Research in Educational Psychology and Psychopedagogy , 1(1).
Available:
http://www.investigacionpsicopedagogica.org/revista/engli
sh/index.php3
[40] Sander ,P. Sanders, L.(2009). Measuring academic
behavioural confidence: the ABC scale revisited. Studies in
Higher Education, 34(1), 19-35.
[41] McNaught, C., Leung, D., Kember, D. (2006). Report on the
Student Engagement Project. Available:
http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/clear/download/SEP_Report_UGCinst_
Oct06.pdf

Nov. 29-30 , 2010 7