You are on page 1of 14

Differences Between OCIMF 2009 and OCIMF 1991

Division ContiTech of Continental AG

Q1-0185

LRQ 4000491

Differences Between OCIMF 2009 and OCIMF 1991 Old


Guide to Purchasing, Manufacturing and Testing of Loading and Discharge Hoses for Offshore Moorings Fourth Edition 1991

New
Guide to Purchasing and Manufacturing Hoses for Offshore Moorings Fifth Edition 2009

Division ContiTech of Continental AG

Q1-0185

LRQ 4000491

Differences Between OCIMF 2009 and OCIMF 1991 Foreword


Definitions added to clarify terms used Clarification on Double / Single Carcass

Division ContiTech of Continental AG

Q1-0185

LRQ 4000491

Differences Between OCIMF 2009 and OCIMF 1991 Technical Requirements


19 & 21 Bar operating pressures 21m/s flow velocity Aromatic content 50% Internal galvanisation Axial load capability Lining thickness Bolt clearances Weld / MPI requirements for hoses with rings Requirements for hoses with nipple-less flanges Changes to lifting lug SWL and orientations

Division ContiTech of Continental AG

Q1-0185

LRQ 4000491

Division ContiTech of Continental AG

Q1-0185

LRQ 4000491

Differences Between OCIMF 2009 and OCIMF 1991 Technical Requirements


19 & 21 Bar operating pressures 21m/s flow velocity Aromatic content 50% Axial load capability Lining thickness Bolt clearances Weld / MPI requirements for hoses with rings Requirements for hoses with nipple-less flanges Internal galvanisation Changes to lifting lug SWL and orientations Double carcass definition Reeling hose section added Offshore LPG hose section added

Division ContiTech of Continental AG

Q1-0185

LRQ 4000491

Differences Between OCIMF 2009 and OCIMF 1991 Acceptance Tests


Material Testing on lining and cover every three months Traceability Stiffness Test Method changed Torsion Test (Optional) Tensile Test (Optional) Proof Pressure Test (1.5 x WP) Continuity Test Lifting Lug Test Manufacturer's Report expanded Branding Double or Single Carcass

Division ContiTech of Continental AG

Q1-0185

LRQ 4000491

Differences Between OCIMF 2009 and OCIMF 1991 Prototype Tests


Clarification of when a new prototype test is required Prototyping on 600mm & 300mm hoses Material Testing on Lining and Cover Torsion Test Tensile Test Dynamic Test

Division ContiTech of Continental AG

Q1-0185

LRQ 4000491

Division ContiTech of Continental AG

Q1-0185

LRQ 4000491

Differences Between OCIMF 2009 and OCIMF 1991 Prototype Tests


Clarification of when a new prototype test is required Prototyping on 600mm & 300mm hoses Material Testing on Lining and Cover Torsion Test Tensile Test Dynamic Test Crush Test Destructive Lifting Lug Test

Division ContiTech of Continental AG

Q1-0185

LRQ 4000491

Differences Between OCIMF 2009 and OCIMF 1991 Inspection Guide


Inspection procedures expanded Acceptance tests expanded

Division ContiTech of Continental AG

Q1-0185

LRQ 4000491

Differences Between OCIMF 2009 and OCIMF 1991 System Design Considerations
Expanded "Hose System Design Commentary (1993)"

Hose system design diagrams and applicable hose types SPM String length calculation corrected MBM String length calculation Tandem String length calculation Discontinuous Hoses Use of MBCs Surge Event recommendations

Division ContiTech of Continental AG

Q1-0185

LRQ 4000491

Differences Between OCIMF 2009 and OCIMF 1991

OCIMF 2009 to be published very soon OCIMF 1991 will be withdrawn in Dec 2011 Until then hoses can be branded and supplied
in accordance with either OCIMF 1991 or OCIMF 2009

Division ContiTech of Continental AG

Q1-0185

LRQ 4000491

Differences Between OCIMF 2009 and OCIMF 1991

Division ContiTech of Continental AG

Q1-0185

LRQ 4000491

You might also like