Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Fifth postulate or also known as the parallel postulate which proposed by Euclid in The Elements has been made subject to be proven by mathematicians throughout the many centuries past. Some of these attempts put forward their own theorem to prove that Euclids parallel postulate is invalid for despite many attempts, failed to be deduced from the four previous postulates. However, some others tried to form less difficult explanation on matters involving paralleling lines, thus using the proof to verify the existence of such lines. One of these notable proofs was proposed by Al-Haytham, an Arabic physicist, mathematician and astronomer. Parallel postulate by Euclid was stated as follows; That, if a straight line falling on two straight lines make the interior angles on the same side less than two right angles, the two straight lines, if produced indefinitely, meet on that side on which are the angles less than the two right angles.
In the Figure 1 above, if +<180, then L1 and L2 will intersect on the right, on the side which the sum of the two interior angles is less than two right angle that also equal to 180. On the other hand, if +=180, L1 and L2 will never intersect each other, notwithstanding how long these two lines extended. The fact that L1 and L2 will never intersect in Figure 2 is actually described what Euclid had proposed as a nature of parallel lines. As mentioned above, Al-Haytham was one of the mathematicians that had put his own proof forward as a verification of Euclids parallel postulate. The following sections in this report will discuss the steps that involved in developing Al-Haythams proof as a complement to the theorem being
empezar_dc@ymail.com 1
Figure 3. Step 1 of Al-Haytham proof The second step in his proof is to construct another line horizontally from the endpoint A thus forming a line of AC that also produce a right angle to AB. empezar_dc@ymail.com 2
Figure 4. Step 2 of Al-Haytham proof Similarly, he constructs a line of BD which also forms a right angle to AB. The result of right angle here shows that both lines CA and DB are perpendicular to the line AB.
Figure 5. Step 3 of Al-Haytham proof He then drops a straight line from endpoint C to the point D thus completing the rectangle ABCD. This proof at this point was actually regarded as equivalent to the parallel postulate since Euclid himself had proposed in his later postulates of the existence of parallelogram and this is obtained using the result of the parallel postulate.
empezar_dc@ymail.com 3
Figure 6. Step 4 of Al-Haytham proof As verification, the measurement tool provided by the Geometers Sketchpad can be utilized to get the accurate length and the angles value of the sketch we are working on. Shown in the Figure 7 below are the lengths of four sides of rectangle ABCD along with the included angles value. As what has been claimed by Al-Haytham, side AC is equal to BD and side CD is equal to AB. These four sides perfectly forming four right angles included in rectangle ABCD.
empezar_dc@ymail.com 4
Figure 8. Step 6 of Al-Haytham proof After that, the line of AE will be cut upon reaching the point where its length is equal to CA. And from endpoint E, he drops a perpendicular line downward which extends until it intersects with the prolonged line of BF through point B. Shown in Figure 9 below are two adjoining rectangles with common side of AB. To the right of the sketch are the angle values of vertex E and F which are a right angle.
empezar_dc@ymail.com 5
Figure 9. Step 7 of Al-Haytham proof After that he draws two lines diagonally from C and E to the same endpoint of B. Logically, and supported by the characteristics of these two rectangles from the previous steps alone, we can actually see that these rectangles are congruent. However, following Al-Haytham proof necessitate us to prove that they are congruent regardless the measurement shown.
Figure 11. Step 9 of Al-Haytham proof To further emphasis his claims, the figure is slightly altered by moving point A vertically downward. Still, the triangles of CAB and EAB must still be equal since both are sharing a common side of AB. By assumption, he claims that CD and EF now are longer than AB.
empezar_dc@ymail.com 7
Figure 12. Step 10 of Al-Haytham proof Next in his proof, point C and E reconnected with the midpoint H. Al-Haytham then says to imagine the side of EF to move along FB and remains perpendicular to it so throughout the motion the right angle of EFB is maintained. When point F coincides with point B, the line of EF will also become overlapped with AB forming a straight vertical line. However, since point A was downwardly altered and its length is now less than EF, point E will lies outside AB and EF now is equal in length with HB. Next, the side of BH will be slid along BD. Gradually when point B coincides with point D, HB will become overlapped with DC because angles HBF and CDB are equal. Since BH=EF=CD, Al-Haytham claims that point H will coincides with C. Similarly, if EF is to move along FD, the point E and F will coincides with C and D respectively. To conclude his proof, he notes that if any straight line moves in this way then its ends will describe a straight line. Hence, point E describes the straight line of EHC. Since H is not lying on AB, as long as it is extended along EHC, no matter how infinite it might be, it will never coincides with point A.
empezar_dc@ymail.com 8
Figure 13. Step 11 of Al-Haytham proof In relation to the parallel postulate, Al-Haytham has proved through these steps that parallel line is exists as what proposed by Euclid. And towards the end of the conclusion of his proof, he had shown that it is in accordance with his earlier statements that; Parallel straight lines are coplanar lines such that if produced indefinitely in both directions they do not intersect in either direction and; If a straight line moves so that one end always lies on a second straight line and so that it always remains perpendicular to that line, then the other end of the moving line will trace out a straight line parallel to the second line. As mentioned before, the Geometers Sketchpad application is used during the process of discussing the selected theorem. Throughout the process, specifically where drawing is involved, GSP had made it possible for our group to easily illustrate the pertaining figure neatly. Even though we took quite a long period to get familiar with the workspace, as this is the first time for everyone in the group using the program, but after a while we manage to utilize it as necessary.
empezar_dc@ymail.com 9
However, there are also few noticeable drawbacks of this program that we encountered throughout our study of the theorem. It is not an overstatement to say that using GSP is a time-consuming process as each and every step will be illustrated on the separate file. And especially for those who are empezar_dc@ymail.com 10
empezar_dc@ymail.com 11