You are on page 1of 25

A review and analysis of microwave absorption in polymer composites filled

with carbonaceous particles


F. Qin and C. Brosseau

Citation: J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012); doi: 10.1063/1.3688435
View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3688435
View Table of Contents: http://jap.aip.org/resource/1/JAPIAU/v111/i6
Published by the American Institute of Physics.

Related Articles
Optical parameters of ZnTe determined using continuous-wave terahertz radiation
J. Appl. Phys. 112, 063104 (2012)
Charge dynamics and electronic structures of monolayer graphene with molecular doping
Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 111907 (2012)
Terahertz transmission ellipsometry of vertically aligned multi-walled carbon nanotubes
Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 111107 (2012)
Generation of high-frequency terahertz waves in periodically poled LiNbO3 based on backward parametric
interaction
Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 111101 (2012)
Terahertz imaging of inhomogeneous electrodynamics in single-layer graphene embedded in dielectrics
Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 091109 (2012)

Additional information on J. Appl. Phys.
Journal Homepage: http://jap.aip.org/
Journal Information: http://jap.aip.org/about/about_the_journal
Top downloads: http://jap.aip.org/features/most_downloaded
Information for Authors: http://jap.aip.org/authors
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
APPLIED PHYSICS REVIEWS
A review and analysis of microwave absorption in polymer composites
filled with carbonaceous particles
F. Qin and C. Brosseau
a)
Universite Europeenne de Bretagne, Lab-STICC, Universite de Brest, CS 93837, 6 avenue Le Gorgeu,
29238 Brest Cedex 3, France
(Received 30 November 2011; accepted 27 January 2012; published online 16 March 2012)
Carbon (C) is a crucial material for many branches of modern technology. A growing number of
demanding applications in electronics and telecommunications rely on the unique properties of C
allotropes. The need for microwave absorbers and radar-absorbing materials is ever growing in
military applications (reduction of radar signature of aircraft, ships, tanks, and targets) as well as in
civilian applications (reduction of electromagnetic interference among components and circuits,
reduction of the back-radiation of microstrip radiators). Whatever the application for which
the absorber is intended, weight reduction and optimization of the operating bandwidth are two
important issues. A composite absorber that uses carbonaceous particles in combination with a
polymer matrix offers a large exibility for design and properties control, as the composite can be
tuned and optimized via changes in both the carbonaceous inclusions (C black, C nanotube, C ber,
graphene) and the embedding matrix (rubber, thermoplastic). This paper offers a perspective on the
experimental efforts toward the development of microwave absorbers composed of carbonaceous
inclusions in a polymer matrix. The absorption properties of such composites can be tailored
through changes in geometry, composition, morphology, and volume fraction of the ller particles.
Polymer composites lled with carbonaceous particles provide a versatile system to probe
physical properties at the nanoscale of fundamental interest and of relevance to a wide range
of potential applications that span radar absorption, electromagnetic protection from natural
phenomena (lightning), shielding for particle accelerators in nuclear physics, nuclear electromag-
netic pulse protection, electromagnetic compatibility for electronic devices, high-intensity radiated
eld protection, anechoic chambers, and human exposure mitigation. Carbonaceous particles are
also relevant to future applications that require environmentally benign and mechanically exible
materials. VC
2012 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3688435]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
A. Carbonaceous materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
B. Filled polymers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
C. Microwave absorbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
D. Objectives and outline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
II. MA THEORY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
A. Microwave interaction with absorbers. . . . . . 5
B. A birds eye view on dielectric
heterostructures theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1. Mixture laws and effective medium
approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2. Computational approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
III. CF-BASED POLYMER COMPOSITES. . . . . . . . 9
A. Continuous-fiber composites. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
B. Short-fiber composites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
IV. CNT-BASED POLYMER COMPOSITES. . . . . . 13
A. MA properties of CNT-based materials . . . . 13
1. CNT loading dependence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2. Geometry of particles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3. Dispersion of particles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4. Interfacial properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
B. Magnetically filled or decorated CNTs . . . . . 15
V. CB-BASED POLYMER COMPOSITES . . . . . . . . 16
A. Single layer microwave absorber . . . . . . . . . . 16
B. Multilayer microwave absorbers. . . . . . . . . . . 16
VI. OTHER TYPES OF C-BASED POLYMER
COMPOSITES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
A. C micro-/nano-coils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
B. Onion-like C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
C. C nanofibers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
D. Graphite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
VII. SUMMARY AND FUTURE PROSPECTS . . . . 19
A. Future prospects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
B. Final thoughts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
a)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail:
brosseau@univ-brest.fr.
0021-8979/2012/111(6)/061301/24/$30.00 VC
2012 American Institute of Physics 111, 061301-1
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Carbonaceous materials
Carbon (C) is the fourth most abundant chemical element
in the universe by mass after hydrogen, helium, and oxygen. It
is the element that is natures choice as a basis for life under
conditions corresponding to those of Earths surface. Pure C
occurs in several ways (see Fig. 1) including diamond, graphite
(carbon black (CB)), graphene, buckminsterfullerene (nano-
sized spheres of rolled-up graphene) and nanotube, each of
which has been a star material at one time, e.g., diamond, the
sp
3
allotrope, was Science magazines molecule of the year in
1988 because for the rst time it could be synthesized as thin
lms by chemical vapor deposition.
1,336
The inherent charge
transport characteristics and the factors that limit the charge
carrier mobility differ signicantly between the various C
nanostructures reecting, on the one hand, the electronic
dimensionality of the structures, and, on the other hand, the
achievable dimensions of the respective p-systems. Bonding
between C and other elements can easily be changed by chemi-
cal reactions and physical interactions. Ever since the develop-
ment of plastic electronics, there has been tremendous interest
in the properties of C-based materials owing to the substantial
p-electron delocalization of fullerenes and C nanotubes
(CNTs). The motivation for the miniaturization of electronics
has continuously pushed the research via the top-down
approach into nanostructures. As one of the most promising
candidates, C nanostructures, either 2D graphene
57
or quasi-
1D CNTs,
8,9
have opened entirely new perspectives toward the
C-based electronics. In many respect CNTs resemble the poly-
mer chains used as composite matrices: both have covalently
bonded structures, similar dimensions, and mechanical exibil-
ity. However, despite considerable interest in adding small
concentrations of CNTs to polymeric materials, what unques-
tionably matters is the ability to disperse them in the polymer
matrix. The difculty to separate bundled tubes, the strong de-
pendence of the conductivity on the CNT structure, and the
lack of techniques for observing their dynamics in molten sus-
pensions, have slowed fundamental progress on their use in
nanotechnology. Over the last decade, through recent techno-
logical advances in nanoplasticsthe fusion of traditional
plastics and the developing eld of nanotechnologymany
exciting results have demonstrated that polymers lled with
C-based materials possess unique properties, including
improved strength and durability, electrical conductivity,
ame resistance, UV absorption, and reduced permeability. In
addition to these properties, the rapid progress in the fabrica-
tion of CNTs and large area % 1 cm
2
graphene akes
10
makes these C structures promising for microwave absorption
(MA) applications, e.g., shielding materials for protection of
electronic devices, reduction in electromagnetic exposure, and
camouage materials for radar and defense projects.
B. Filled polymers
The study of the electromagnetic properties of an ensem-
ble of ller particles embedded in a polymer matrix requires
the determination of not only the intrinsic electromagnetic
properties of the individual particles but also the type and
strength of interparticle interactions, e.g., long-range dipole-
dipole interactions, clustering, and matrix-particle interac-
tions, such as multicontact chain adsorption to the surface of
the ller. It has been well established that spatial inhomogene-
ities, i.e., clusters of ller particles, give rise to polarization
phenomena and therefore to a frequency dependence of the
effective permittivity.
11
However, understanding how elec-
trons are distributed in these ller aggregates remains one out-
standing unresolved problem in mesoscopics of disordered
materials, making it difcult to know which theoretical frame-
work is most appropriate for understanding these compounds,
e.g., localization by disorder is a common cause of insulating
behavior in condensed matter systems.
Among the broad variety of polymers suitable for embed-
ding carbonaceous particles for MA applications, epoxy resins
are good candidates due to their low cost, ease of mixing with
different types of llers, resistance to oxidative photo-
degradation, and stability in sunlight. An epoxy polymer chain
is made up of alternating single and double carbon bonds,
which enables the formation of a spatially delocalized electron
FIG. 1. (Color) Some allotropes of C: (a) diamond; (b) graphite; (c) lonsda-
leite; (df) fullerenes (C60, C540, C70); (g) amorphous carbon; (h) carbon
nanotube (Courtesy of Michael Strock, reprinted from http://en.wikipe-
dia.org/wiki/Carbon); (i) graphene (reprinted with permission from Ref.
338, copyright 2009 Wiley and Sons).
061301-2 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
system. This electronic distribution is strongly affected
by selective chain adsorption on the CB aggregates pro-
viding charge trapping sites.
1116
This effect has previously
been experimentally studied in the context of CB-lled
polymers.
1719
The conductivity of these systems relies on
two distinct carrier types within the CB aggregates and
agglomerates. Such a separation of carriers has been recently
predicted by Brosseau et al.
1719
on the basis of electron spin
resonance experiments. Their results suggest that the majority
of the carriers are conned to the aggregate and agglomerate
surfaces. Localization by disorder is a common cause of insu-
lating behavior in these systems. Yet, some open questions
remain. For instance, it would be desirable to know how
aggregation effects of the ller particles create microstructures
with multiscale and hierarchical structures formed when the
ller particles are immersed in the complex uid environment
formed by polymer chains.
337
The heart of the problem lies in
the strength of the van der Waals attraction among the par-
ticles. Once they come into contact, they form irregular clus-
ters the morphology of which is determined by the kinetics of
aggregation. Another relevant question is how aggregation
and agglomeration of ller particles inuence the conductivity
and the polarization mechanisms. The experimental character-
ization of ller particle clusters polarization and conduction is
a nontrivial task. The experimental determination of the 3D
detailed structure of this ller phase can be complicated
because it requires a difcult tomography analysis, which is
often restricted in spatial resolution. Most data available is ei-
ther very limited or performed in extremely diluted systems
where the average dipolar interaction is very weak. In addi-
tion, most conventional analysis do not take spatial conne-
ment factors into consideration. In this regard, important
information of the electrical connection among the ller
aggregates can be obtained by using local probes, e.g., electric
force microscopy, capacitance probe microscopy, or atomic
force microscopy.
2227
C. Microwave absorbers
To a large extent, the theoretical and experimental
efforts designed to provide microwave absorbers are associ-
ated with two important features of their electromagnetic
properties. The rst is based on enhanced magnetic losses
due to, for example, resonance phenomenon in the higher
frequency region (>300 MHz). Additionally, it has been
argued that the second feature is related to enhanced dielec-
tric losses. The magnetic losses of the spinel ferrites become
small in accordance with Snoeks limit and, thus, these mate-
rials are not adequate in the GHz frequency range. However,
considerable research has been devoted to developing arti-
cial composite media using a wide range of polymers lled
with M-type hexaferrites posessing large tunable anisotropy
eld.
2840
Advances in ferrite technology have given experi-
mentalists unprecedented control over gyromagnetic reso-
nance characteristics for selective frequencies or over a
narrow frequency range, paving the way to fabrication of ra-
dar absorbers.
41
Many recent experiments and simulations
investigated the behavior of ferromagnetic nanoparticles in
combination with a dielectric matrix material for MA.
33,42
MA has also been discussed in the context of aluminum (Al)
akes and CB-lled polymers.
4354
Variations of the content
of the Al and CB constituents allow the real and imaginary
parts of the effective permittivity of the composite to be
tuned independently to match some absorption requirement
at a given frequency. One signicant advantage of these
(lightweight) polymeric composites is that, depending on the
ller particles incorporation-mixing process and by an
adjustment of the nature and geometry of the ller particles,
they offer multiple degrees of freedom to tune the particles
aggregation state and the overall effective permittivity.
There has been a long history for research into C-based
absorbers.
5559
The rst use of C particles into absorber dates
back to 1936 when an absorber based on CB and TiO
2
was
patented in the Netherlands.
60
During World War II (WWII),
the United States developed an absorbing material known as
Halpern anti radiation paint (HARP) based on rubber lled
with CB and Al akes. It was then successfully implemented
in airborne and seaborne vehicles for radar absorption with a
1520 dB absorption at the X-band.
61,62
Broadband absorb-
ers grabbed the attention in the post-WWII period. C-loaded
plaster and graphite were among the most intensively inves-
tigated absorbing materials. In the 1950s, C-based absorbers
started to nd commercial use. For example, Spongex made
of C-coated animal hair, developed by the Sponge Products
Company, was able to give 20 dB attenuation in the range
2.410 GHz with a thickness of 50.8 mm and normal inci-
dence. With the development of absorbers of particular struc-
tures in the 1960s and 1970s, particulate or brous C, among
other materials, were used to ll or coat on the netlike struc-
tures, knitted structures, or honeycomb structures.
63
CB and
graphite remained the favorite absorbing candidates until the
discovery of CNTs in the 1990s, which have been exploited
to a wide range of potential industrial applications, including
MA.
64102
Since the beginning of this millennium, other
forms of C-based absorbers with good absorption character-
istics have appeared, due to advances in synthesis techniques
and optimized design approaches.
103112
Most recently, gra-
phene joined the C family for MA applications.
113115
The characterization of absorbers can be done via stand-
ard measurement methods, i.e., direct measurement of the
reection in free space with transmission eliminated by a
metal substrate attached on the absorbers, or indirect meas-
urements of their electromagnetic parameters. The main
requirements for the absorbers are as follows: (i) it should
minimize the front-face reection and impedance matching
at the air to absorber interface, (ii) it should increase the
absorption of electromagnetic waves through high values of
dielectric and magnetic losses, (iii) it is expected to be
applied in a wide frequency range, and (iv) it does not
require the use of an external magnetic eld.
116121
Micro-
wave absorbing materials, including Salisbury screens, Jau-
mann absorbers, particle laden polymeric layers, and paints
are generally passive systems, although there is some work
dealing with active surfaces, such as variable impedance
surfaces.
Over the last decade, through recent technological
advances in nanoplasticsthe fusion of traditional plastics
and the developing eld of nanotechnologymany exciting
061301-3 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
results have demonstrated that polymers lled with C-based
materials have unique properties including improved
strength and durability, electrical conductivity, ame resist-
ance, UV absorption, and reduced permeability. Excellent
absorbing materials are expected to have not only a strong
MA and a wide absorption bandwidth, but also to be light-
weight, have a ne thickness, and be cost-effective.
122
For
these reasons, C-based polymer materials are useful to mate-
rials scientists in guiding their ongoing efforts to design MA
materials. Since the early 2000s, a number of researchers in
academia and industry have investigated the possibility of
realizing exible electronic device technologies, e.g., arti-
cially structured soft materials with tunable electric and elec-
tromagnetic properties.
123
Flexible circuit technology
attracts much attention in the electronics industry for porta-
ble applications because the exible substrate can be rolled,
bent, and folded to t a limited space where required. To
achieve the control required for technology will require a far
more complete understanding. Of particular interest is the
observation of unexpected physical effects, which emerge as
the size of carbonaceous llers reaches a few nanometers. As
well as the fundamental nature of such question, this issue is
clearly of much interest to experimentalists who try to
explore multifunctionalities in nanostructures.
D. Objectives and outline
In the pursuit of technological advances at the nano-
scale, MA of polymer composites with different allotropes
of C continues to draw substantial research interests both as
a fundamental subject and as a serious reliability concern in
nanoelectronics materials and devices. By controlling the
microstructural heterogeneities in these composites, unique
absorption responses at the macroscale can be achieved. This
necessitates developing systematic fabrication procedures to
optimize the MA. In what follows, we review the MA prop-
erties of polymer composites with C-based particles, includ-
ing carbon bers (CFs), CNTs, CB, graphene, and other
C-based materials. To our knowledge, no dedicated review
paper is available on this topic. We have endeavored to bring
together in one place diverse results so as to provide the
readers a fairly comprehensive panorama of our current
knowledge in terms of the inuence of the carbonaceous
component in their composites on MA. Each of the results is
briey described and, whenever possible, accompanied by
its implications for MA. While the descriptions here are not
extensive for reasons of space, we have provided relevant
pointers to the literature for a more in-depth study. Such a
review will be of much interest to the scientic and engineer-
ing communities, notably those working on nanocomposite
science and technology. We believe it is thus a sensible and
opportune time to revisit the claims made for high MA and
also make a comparison with other microwave absorbent
materials.
In spite of the recent advances, this research program still
presents quite a few challenges related to the following ques-
tions, such as what C-based ller properties determine the
MA features in polymer composites? How does one design
and optimize the C component to obtain the best absorption
characteristics of these composites? Some indications for the
possible answers stem from key experimental observations
that have motivated this review paper. However, despite the
substantial empirical literature on MA, the mechanism by
which various carbonaceous particles inhibit or exalt MA
remains largely unsolved.
The rest of the review is organized as follows. In Sec. II
we provide a brief description of the theoretical methods
most commonly employed to describe MA and dielectric
heterostructures with an eye on their strengths and limita-
tions. Secs. III to VI survey the research to date on MA of
polymer nanocomposites with different types of C-based l-
ler particles. The review is then concluded in Sec. VII with
some prospects given.
II. MATHEORY
Although the phenomenon of MA has been known for
many decades and the cause of the absorption is well formu-
lated, the design of absorbers has occupied the minds of
many materials scientists and engineers for centuries.
Recently, the problem has garnered even more attention and
has become more important than ever. In addition to aca-
demic reasons, its practical impact on society has been rec-
ognized. The growing public concern about possible human
health effects in relation to weak radio frequency (RF) elds,
i.e., health hazards from environmental elds,
124126
moti-
vate the relevant research.
In this section, fundamental knowledge of microwave
absorption will be presented as well as an overview of mix-
ture law theory. These two together provide a theoretical
route to an optimized design of absorbers. Microwave
energy, when incident on a lossy dispersive material, creates
heating within the material through the interactions of the
electromagnetic eld with the materials molecular and elec-
tronic structure. Homogeneous and heterogeneous media an-
alyzed within an effective medium approach are described
by two material parameters: the complex (relative) permittiv-
ity e e
0
je
00
and the magnetic permeability (relative)
l l
0
jl
00
. The terms e
0
(and l
0
) are associated with
energy storage and e
00
(and l
00
) are associated with dielectric
loss or energy dissipation within a material resulting from
conduction, resonance, and relaxation mechanisms. The loss
tangent of the dielectric material is tan d e
00
=e
0
, where d is
the dielectric loss angle of the material. Energy loss in a ma-
terial illuminated by electromagnetic waves comes about
through damping forces acting on polarized atoms and mole-
cules and through the nite conductivity of a material. It is
common knowledge in electromagnetism that the Poynting
theorem governs our understanding of the conservation of
power in linear, dispersive media.
127
It states that the total
power (for a harmonic electromagnetic eld of angular fre-
quency x) entering a volume V through the surface S goes
partially into increasing the eld energy stored inside V and
partially is lost into heat, i.e.,
@u
@t
r:S j:E 2xIm e E j j
2
_ _
l H j j
2
_ _ _ _
; (2.1)
where,
061301-4 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
u Re e
0
d xe
dx
E j j
2
_ _
l
0
d xl
dx
H j j
2
_ _
_ _
; (2.2)
h i denotes the time average over the period of the carrier
frequency, and S E H is the Poynting vector. The quan-
tities e
0
and l
0
are the permittivity and the magnetic perme-
ability of vacuum, respectively. The quantities E and H are
the electric and magnetic eld intensities, respectively. The
quantity j accounts for both conductive and dielectric losses.
We observe that the conductive and dielectric losses are
indistinguishable with respect to the heat generated. Apply-
ing external electromagnetic elds to a composite material
implies that the electromagnetic waves come across a variety
of microscopic boundary conditions due to the inclusions
making the heterostructure. The resulting local eld varia-
tions can have a very strong effect on energy absorption at
such boundaries because absorption depends quadratically
on the electric eld intensity.
A. Microwave interaction with absorbers
Figure 2 shows a multilayer microwave absorber that
consists of n layers of different materials backed by a perfect
electric conductor (PEC). For simplicity, we consider that
the electromagnetic wave is normally incident. Here d
i
, g
i
and c
i
denote the thickness, the complex intrinsic impedance,
and the propagation constant of the ith layer, respectively.
The conductivity for each individual layer of the absorber is
assumed to be zero. According to the transmission-line
theory,
58,128,129
the wave impedance Z
i
of the ith layer is
given by,
Z
i
g
i
Z
i1
g
i
tanh c
i
d
i

g
i
Z
i1
tanh c
i
d
i

; (2.3)
where g
i
g
0

l
i
=e
_
, c
i
j2pf

le
p
=c, g
0
is the characteris-
tic impedance of the free space; and l
i
and e
i
are the relative
complex permeability and permittivity of the ith layer,
respectively. Considering that the metal plate is a PEC,
g
0
0, the impedance of rst layer reads as:
Z
1
g
1
tanh c
1
d
1
: (2.4)
The reection loss (RL) of normal incident electromagnetic
wave at the absorber surface is given by,
RL 20 log C j j 20 log
Z
n
g
0
Z
n
g
0

; (2.5)
where C is the reection coefcient. Through Eqs. (2.3) to
(2.5), we can see that the combination of the magnetic per-
meability and the permittivity (of both absorbing and sub-
strate layers) satisfying the impedance matching condition
is the key to producing a high-performance microwave
absorber.
Specically, for a single layer of absorber backed by a
PEC, which is a common situation in many studies discussed
above, the reection loss is given as,
RL 20 log

l
e
_
tanh j
2pfd
c

le
p
_ _
1

l
e
_
tanh j
2pfd
c

le
p
_ _
1

: (2.6)
The attenuation constant a (real part of the propagation
factor c), in nepers/m, is dened by,
58,130
a Re c
Re
jx

le
p
c
_ _

2
p
c

l
00
e
00
l
0
e
0

l
02
l
002
e
02
e
002

_
_
;
(2.7)
where c is the speed of light in free space. Here we can see
that the attenuation constant is dependent on complex mag-
netic permeability, permittivity, and frequency. If we con-
sider diamagnetic carbonaceous materials, MA is due to
dielectric losses. Before we proceed to consider the case of
pure dielectrics with l 1 j0, we rst consider for the
purpose of comparison the case of ferrites with strong mag-
netic losses; their absorption being mainly due to the ferro-
magnetic resonance. To satisfy the minimum reection loss,
according to Eq. (2.6) the perfect matching condition is,

l
e
_
tanh j
2pfd
c

le
p
_ _
1: (2.8)
Usually,
2pfd
c

le
p
(1, as the thickness d is much smaller
than the wavelength and e is also small. It follows from
Eq. (2.8) that,
j
2pfd
c
l
0
jl
00
1; (2.9)
which can be reduced to,
l
0
0 and l
00

c
2pfd
: (2.10)
We nd that the matching frequency f
m
is,
f
m

c
2pdl
00
: (2.11)
The matching frequency should be generally the same as the
natural resonance frequency, which can be given by,
131133
FIG. 2. Schematic of a multilayer microwave absorber with a normally inci-
dent wave. d
i
, l
i
, and e
i
denotes the thickness, relative magnetic permeability
and permittivity of the ith layer, respectively.
061301-5 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
f
r
2p
H
a
; (2.12)
where c=2p 2:8 MHz/Oe is the gyromagnetic ratio. The
anisotropy eld H
a
is given by,
134
H
a

2 K
1
j j
l
0
M
s
; (2.13)
where K
1
is the anisotropy constant and M
s
is the saturation
magnetization. Larger saturation magnetization or smaller
anisotropy eld will redshift the resonance frequency, which
also means an improved absorption bandwidth, because there
exists a trade-off between resonance frequency and absorp-
tion bandwidth.
135
We now turn to the case of a dielectric absorbent.
Assuming that l 1 j0, Eq. (2.6) can be written as,
RL 20 log

1
e
_
tanh j
2pfd
c

e
p
_ _
1

1
e
_
tanh j
2pfd
c

e
p
_ _
1

: (2.14)
As

1=e
_
tanh j
2pfd
c

e
p _ _
< 1, the best possible matching, i.e.,

1=e
_
tanh j
2pfd
c

e
p _ _
, achieves maximum. As
2pfd
c

e
p
(1,
the best possible matching condition is,

1
e
_
j
2pfd
c

e
p
: (2.15)
This can be reduced to,
e
0
0; e
00

c
2pfd
: (2.16)
This is quite similar to Eq. (2.10). At the best matching con-
dition, we can calculate the maximum reection loss as
follows:
RL
max
20 log
1
e
1
1
e
1

: (2.17)
After some transformation, we obtain,
RL
max
20 log 1
4
2 e
00
tan d
1
tan d
_ _
_
_
_
_
: (2.18)
Note that tan d
1
tan d
_ _
is monotonically decreasing,
8tan d < 1. Thus, maximum reection loss should be eval-
uated by considering both e
00
and loss tangent. The usual case
is that larger e
00
give rise to larger loss tangents, thus an opti-
mized e
00
and associated loss tangent can be expected to
achieve the maximum absorption condition (too small or too
large e
00
will not be in favor of absorption), as shown in Fig. 3.
This is further conrmed by the attenuation constant,
a
x

2
p
c

e
0

e
02
e
002

_
_
: (2.19)
After some transformation, we obtain,
a
x

2c
p

e
00

1
1
tan
2
d

1
tan d
_
_ _

_
: (2.20)
At the matching frequency, the attenuation constant reads as,
a
x

2d
p

1
e
00

1
1
tan
2
d

1
tan d
_
_ _

_
: (2.21)
B. A birds eye viewon dielectric heterostructures
theory
One long-standing issue and rich area of research in the
theory of composite materials is the determination of their
effective transport properties that relate average ux elds to
average gradient elds. See, e.g., Ref. 136 for a review. A prin-
cipal question with these materials is how the effective permit-
tivity of a composite medium can be evaluated as a function of
the intrinsic permittivity of the phases, their volume fraction,
their shape and size, and their geometrical arrangement associ-
ated with the material mixture. As far as is known, theories and
experiments have been able to highlight some facets of this
issue but not reveal the complete physical picture. The recent
reviews of Sahimi,
137
Milton,
138
and Sihvola
139
summarized a
broad range of theoretical techniques which have, by now, been
applied to solve this central challenge. Complementary to semi-
empirical analytical approaches, accurate computer simulations
(reviewed in, e.g., Ref. 140) have produced a full electromag-
netic description of a suspension of inclusions having arbitrary
shape and size, subject to a complex dielectric environment
as explicit function of the volume fraction of inclusion. The
physical parameters characterizing these systems are numeri-
cally tunable so that it is viable for one to do the theoretical
design and optimization of novel optimized multifunctional
materials.
141
1. Mixture laws and effective medium approaches
It is well known that the ller particles volume fraction
dependence of permittivity exhibits nonlinearity at relatively
FIG. 3. (Color online) Dielectric loss dependence of the maximum reec-
tion loss for different values of e.
061301-6 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
low ller particle contents, i.e., / % 10 15 vol. %. One
common approach to permittivity calculations is based on
mixing laws. For the rest of this section, we consider two
(popular ones) of them among many that have been sug-
gested in the literature; rst, the Maxwell Garnett (MG) law,
e e
1
e 2e
1
/
e
2
e
1
e
2
2e
1
: (2.22)
However, this is a special case dealing with spherical mono-
disperse particles. A second, alternative to the MG mixing
law, i.e., Lichteneker and Rothers law,
e
k
/ e
2

k
1 / e
1

k
; (2.23)
where k is within the range [1,1], is often found in the liter-
ature. Their validity, though widely accepted in the dilute
limit, is sometimes debated on theoretical grounds. In previ-
ous literature, mixing laws have sometimes produced (quan-
titatively) incorrect results in evaluating permittivity.
140
The
advantages as well as the effectiveness of different mixing
laws have been discussed by Brosseau and Beroual.
140
Effective medium analysis (EMA) is widely known for
being an alternate formulation of phenomenological mixing
laws, and appears in many review papers and textbooks as a
useful calculational tool for various statistical dielectric and
mechanical problems within the long-wavelength description
of the wave propagation.
136,137,140,141
Once an order parame-
ter, the CB volume fraction / in the host matrix, has been
identied, one constructs a permittivity functional
e e
1
; e
2
; / that satises the self-consistency requirement in
the long-wavelength physics description. Generally speak-
ing, these approaches make use of the idea that a medium
containing inclusions of another phase can be approximated
as a homogeneous material. The underlying assumption, i.e.,
effective properties depend only on the materials constants
of the pure phases and their volume fractions, is of course an
approximation, and the quality of the theoretical predictions
can hardly be controlled.
136142
A classic example of an
effective model is the Bruggeman symmetric equation which
can be written, for spherical particles, in the form,
1 /
e e
1

e 2e
1
/
e e
2

e 2e
2
0: (2.24)
There are reasons to doubt the validity of the Bruggeman
prediction over a large range of / values. Despite its general-
ity, Eq. (2.1) hinges on certain implicit assumptions. One is
that the typical inhomogeneity length scale in the hetero-
structure is much smaller than the wavelength of the electro-
magnetic wave probing the system. Another one is that only
dipolar interactions contribute to the polarization. All details
of the microstructure are encoded in the order parameter /.
Another assumption is that a continuum representation of the
system is effective. However, incorporation of CB nanopar-
ticles into a polymer material can lead to large property
changes that are difcult to comprehend by extension of the
effects of macroscopic ller additives. Notably, this is due to
the much larger density of interface between the two phases
of different electromagnetic parameters. The nature of the
relations between these interfaces, of nanometric extension,
and macroscopic (effective) properties, such as permittivity,
is not completely understood.
The theory of percolation (critical) phenomena is rele-
vant to a very large number of physics problems. These
include, on the condensed-matter side, the insulator-
conductor transition.
141143
Going back to the critical be-
havior of percolative heterostructures can give rise to a
bewildering array of physical effects,
141,144148
especially
when they are combined with nite-size effects.
143,149153
The experimental activity
141,143,153
has been steady. To
describe how the effective conductivity versus inclusion vol-
ume fraction behaves close to the isotropic percolation
threshold /
c
of the conducting constituent, the following
formulas can be employed,
143,153155
r r
1
/
c
/
s
for / < /
c
; (2.25)
r r
2
r
2
=r
1

t
st
; (2.26)
r r
2
/ /
c

t
for / > /
c
; (2.27)
where s and t are critical exponents having the so-called uni-
versal values, i.e., s 0:7 and t 2 in 3D, r
1
is the electrical
conductivity of the insulator matrix and r
2
is the electrical
conductivity of the conductive llers. Because the percolation
model is independent of the nature of the ller particles and
the nature of the insulating host matrix, it is possible to apply
to most polymers lled with powdery materials. At this stage
it is worthwhile stressing the fact that while such an approach
can give valuable insights into the CB volume fraction de-
pendence of the effective conductivity, the intrinsic value of
the lling phase is generally unknown. Scher and Zallen pre-
dicted that the percolation threshold is close to 17 vol. % for
conducting spherical particles distributed randomly within a
3D dielectric matrix.
156158
However, it is well established
that the CB particles form aggregates with more or less irregu-
lar and tenuous shapes. For low structure CB the aggregates
are small and regular, while for high structure CB the aggre-
gates typically contain a few hundreds of particles. Because of
their often somewhat elongated shapes the probability of
aggregate-aggregate contact is larger than it would have been
had the aggregate been a compact sphere. Hence, the conduc-
tion threshold is usually lower than the 17 vol. % of ller par-
ticles, as is the case of the composites investigated here. In
addition, the insulator-conductor transition width is often large
due to variations in the particle aggregate size, geometry, and
orientation.
158
During the past decade, different prescriptions to deal
with the problem of modeling the dielectric behavior in multi-
component percolative materials over the entire range of
phase concentration have been proposed in the literature.
Each of these methods improves one failing or another in the
EMA, but they often bear a semiempirical character, and none
can be considered universal and parameter-free. In particular,
McLachlan and co-workers
159163
made an important contri-
bution by proposing a simple two exponent phenomenological
percolation equation (TEPPE) that depends on s and t for
characterizing the effective complex permittivity e / ,
061301-7 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
1 /
e
1=~ s
1
e
1=~ s
1
_ _
e
1=~s
1
1 /
c
=/
c
e
1=~s
1
/
e
1=~t
2
e
1=~t
_ _
e
1=~t
2
1 /
c
=/
c
e
1=~t
0; (2.28)
where e
1
denotes the permittivity of the host matrix.
With regard to Eq. (2.28), several remarks are appropri-
ate. First, because in practice e
1
, e
2
, /
c
, ~ s, and
~
t can be deter-
mined from experimental measurements, the proposed
method requires no empirical t parameters making it ideal
for predicting e /
2
. However, from recent experimental evi-
dence it has become clear that much earlier modeling of
composites is based on values of many quantities that are
difcult to obtain. For example, any attempt to determine
the absolute value of the permittivity of powder materials
can be seriously challenged depending on the experi-
mental conditions and the technique employed in the
measurement.
12,164169
Second, it is worth observing that the
TEPPE is not a mean-eld theory analogous to Eq. (2.24)
that neglects order-parameter uctuations. One attribute of
this equation is that the two behaviors (mean-eld Brugge-
man model for / (/
c
and if one sets ~ s
~
t 1), and criti-
cal percolation model for / % /
c
and if one sets ~ s s and
~
t t) are recovered as limiting cases of Eq. (2.28). It is also
important to remark that while in principle it is possible to
observe a singularity at /
c
1=3 within the symmetric
Bruggeman model as the ratio e
2
=e
1
!1, in practice /
c
in
Eq. (2.28) can be varied between 0 and 1. Third, another fea-
ture of Eq. (2.28) is that it only depends on the volume (sur-
face) fractions, or particle number densities, of constituents
in the mixture. This originates from the important fact that
Bruggemans formulation is based on a dipolar analysis, and
does not take into account the multipole correlations, i.e.,
many-body problem inherent in the electromagnetics of the
particular system. It is now well accepted that for dispersed
two-phase mixtures other interface descriptors (local struc-
ture) should appear in the averaged equation for the permit-
tivity. Furthermore, it turns out that no reference to any
internal length scale is explicitly included. Fourth, in a series
of papers, McLachlan and co-workers explored the validity
of this equation and analyzed many experiments.
159163
To
match the experimental data an appropriate choice of the
unspecied constants ~ s and
~
t in Eq. (2.28) were used and
treated as t parameters. However, while this approach has
been found capable of reproducing the salient trends of
e / e
0
/ ie
00
/ , the empirical nature of the TEPPE
restricts its predictive power.
2. Computational approaches
Note that the present-day numerical techniques allow us
to deal directly with the experimentally relevant range of the
model parameters. The electromagnetic response of composite
materials should be circumvented by the use of validated theo-
retical methods.
144,146,147,149,170173
As both computing power
and the efciency of computational methods are steadily
increasing, it is becoming possible to investigate new compos-
ite materials through computer simulations, before they have
even been synthesized. Many theorists have examined this
subject by performing ab initio calculations, e.g., density-
functional theory (DFT),
174176
or nite element method
(FEM).
177
The nite element method (FEM) has considerable
exibility because arbitrary shapes can be modeled. The FEM
takes much more time and memory than the nite-difference-
time-domain (FDTD) because it is required to solve linear
equations in each time step. Consequently, the FEM is mainly
used in the frequency domain and eigenmode analysis. For a
general presentation of the nite element modeling of non-
destructive material evaluation, we refer the interested reader
to Ref. 178. There is a vast literature on the FEM in the con-
text of engineering. It is also worth noting that FEM software
with exible mesh generators, robust equation solvers, and
versatile post-processors have become available in recent
years. Interested readers are referred to Refs. 179183 for a
general introduction of FEM. Other relevant numerical techni-
ques include the different variants of boundary integral equa-
tion (BIE),
140,184
rst-principles molecular dynamics,
185187
nite integration algorithm,
187189
Monte Carlo (MC),
190
mul-
tipole moments,
191,192
differential evolution (DE),
193
genetic
algorithm (GA),
194
or FDTD.
195197
The widespread use of
the World Wide Web (www) offers the unprecedented oppor-
tunity of delivering information through an easy-to-use and
easy-to-learn interface. Nowadays, the front-end provided by
popular www browsers is known and available to millions of
users, and has become a de-facto standard for the dissemina-
tion of information. Complementary and up to date informa-
tion on the FDTD methods is available at http://www.fdtd.org,
and fast Fourier transform (FFT) method
198,199
on a variety of
systems where only two phases are present. Related to the
problem at hand, the notions of random close packing (RCP)
and maximally random jamming have been discussed by Tor-
quato and co-workers.
141,200
The main problem is that real
calculations are not easy, and the challenge is to nd a reason-
able balance between the choice of method, desired accuracy,
and computational expense. The most desirable approach for
fully harnessing the dielectric properties of heterostructures at
the macroscale must be inherently multiscale (both in time
and space) because its evolution is mediated by a combination
of atomic level dynamics, defect physics, nonequilibrium ther-
modynamics, and transport kinetics. Most numerical analyses
reported thus far have fallen short of this goal for a variety of
reasons. While numerical approaches may be exact in princi-
ple, the true form of the randomness is unknown. The high
computational cost of averaging over a large set of system
congurations makes it difcult to obtain well-converged esti-
mates of the observables. Current research is pushing avail-
able approximations toward the description of uctuations on
the hierarchy of length scales that are relevant to the problem.
Actually, the cross-fertilization between computational and
analytical work in the area of composite materials is rapidly
growing. Unfortunately, current feasible representations for
the a priori knowledge of the microstructure of the composite,
such as the correlation functions that specify the average mi-
croscopic arrangement of the constituents, require signicant
experience in the construction of reliable and solvable micro-
structures. The primary reason for the limitation of exact
061301-8 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
calculations of the property of interest, especially for contin-
uum models, has been the lack of efcient algorithms suited
to generate collections of random packings of particles (disks,
spheres). It is perhaps fair to observe that theories that start
with similar algorithms may arrive at different descriptions of
their properties. Yet even if this disorder representation prob-
lem were solved in its entirety, the would-be composite de-
signer would still face the formidable tasks of (i) nding the
starting entities that will maintain their structural integrity
throughout the synthesis process, and (ii) controlling the mor-
phology he or she wished to engineer. As testimony to these
difculties, it is not uncommon to nd in the literature dis-
agreements over the predictions of the porosity, mean coordi-
nation number, and radial distribution function.
201,202
With the guidance of absorption and dielectric hetero-
structures theories detailed in Sec. II, we will discuss in
detail the polymer absorber with each kind of C ller. The
emphasis is placed on the description and analysis of absorp-
tion features, i.e., maximum absorption, absorption band-
width with respect to the thickness and ller content. The
methods of tailoring the C llers and the design of macro-
scopic structure are also presented. In addition to providing
the readers sufcient information for choosing and designing
C-based absorbers for a targeted MA application, an overall
evaluation of the C-ller loaded polymer composites is also
given to clearly identify their practical value. In view of the
rich class of C-based llers that have been discovered and
produced, we lay out the following discussion in a sequence
conforming to the signicance from the application point of
view. As such, we start from CF-based composites which
have been identied as the core engineering material super-
seding conventional metals and alloys as critical structural
components. This is followed with CNT-based polymer
composites and then with CB-lled materials. Finally, we
complete this presentation by giving a avor of other forms
of C-based polymer materials containing C coils, C onions,
and C nanobers. To make this review easier to follow, Ta-
ble I summarizes the absorption properties for the various
composite materials discussed in this review paper.
III. CF-BASED POLYMER COMPOSITES
Carbon ber reinforced polymer composites (CFRP)
have been the focus of many fundamental and engineering
studies due to their unique mechanical performance compared
with their low density. It was reported that 28000 tons of CF
with an estimated price of US$50200/kg were produced in
2006, yet still cannot meet the demand.
203,204
An increasing
amount of CF is used in the aircraft industry to reduce weight
and, hence, improve the performance of aircraft, although
some issues such as in-ight structural health monitoring
remain unresolved.
204
It is also desirable to know if CF-lled
polymer composites can absorb electromagnetic waves to
reduce interference and radar backscattering. Unfortunately,
CFRP containing large concentrations ($6070 vol. %) of
CFs having typical dc conductivity (10
5
10
6
Xm at micro-
wave frequency) are quasi-reective when they interact with
electromagnetic waves. It is generally believed that
CFRP-polymer composites can be used for electromagnetic
interference shielding application,
205
but these materials are
not fully adapted for MA.
A. Continuous-fiber composites
One of the key aspects in materials engineering is to tai-
lor materials in terms of morphology and structure to modify
their macroscopic properties and meet the requirements of a
specic application. If the material is intrinsically non-
applicable, one can transform it to be applicable via appro-
priate tailoring approaches. In this regard, it is possible to
modify CFs to make them applicable for MA applications.
For example, Zhu et al.
206
coated pitch-based CF (PCF)
using amino-modied polyorganosiloxane with low conduc-
tivity and surface area to increase the contact resistance.
Nonwovens with various PCF contents up to 100 vol. %
were characterized from 8 to 18 GHz. A complicated de-
pendence of the electromagnetic characteristics depending
on PCF content was observed. For small PCF concentrations,
the absorption dominates the attenuation (reection is rather
small), while at larger concentrations, the reection domi-
nates the attenuation. Quantitatively, a maximum absorption
of 18 dB was achieved at 18 GHz for a PCF concentration of
2 wt. %, with a large absorption bandwidth (818 GHz). In
this paper, absorption or reection losses are presented in
absolute values. This absorption level is larger than that of
nonwovens containing CB, such as reported by Lopes and
co-workers,
207
i.e., a 4 GHz (812 GHz) absorption band-
width was obtained for the sample containing 33 wt. % CB.
Wu et al.
208
pointed out that activated CF (ACF) is an effec-
tive way to increase MA because ACF can signicantly exalt
multiple reections with a longer propagation distance inside
the composites. This was later conrmed by Zou et al.
209
who reported an enhanced absorption of 16.6 dB for compo-
sites containing ACF with a 12 GHz absorption bandwidth
(618 GHz). Because wasted CF can be regenerated for the
production of ACF,
210
the excellent microwave properties of
ACF make them materials of choice for MA materials. Other
work worth mentioning is that of Zeng et al.,
211
who showed
that a CuO/Co layer on the surface of CF has a signicant
effect on MA, the maximum absorption is 23.0dB for CuO/CF
and equal to 42.7 dB for CuO/Co/CF at matching thickness of
2 mm. The decoration of CFs surface by magnetic nanopar-
ticles has also a profound impact on MA, arising from the
additional absorption mechanism introduced by these par-
ticles, such as Neel relaxation, and the interface created
between the particles and CF, which can promote interfacial
polarization. Most important, the improvement of impedance
matching when magnetic particles are present leads to an
enhanced absorption as compared to the case of pure CFs.
ACFs can also be structured in a specic design termed CF-
felt screens,
212
in analogy to traditional metallic frequency
selective surface, in either cross-linked (Fig. 4(a)) or vertical
manners, and embedded into an epoxy matrix. When inter-
acting with an incident microwave eld the CF-felt screens
behave as a waveguide when they are cross-linked or as an
antenna when they are vertically aligned. The MA character-
istics are found to be strongly dependent on the geometric
parameters of the ber array, such as the spacing between
061301-9 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
TABLE 1. Summary of the absorption properties for the various polymer composites lled with carbonaceous particles discussed in this review paper.
a
Matrix Filler Configuration of composite Filler fraction, wt% MT, mm [MA]
max
, dB F, GHz A, GHz Ref.
Epoxy PAN-based CF (activated)
b
Single-layer, Felt screen 55.5% 4.0 30.6 12.4 10 (8-18) [212]
Polyester Pitch-based CF (activated) Single-layer, Non-woven 2 % 10.0 18 18 10 (818) [206]
Epoxy CF (activated) Single-layer 0.43 % 4.0 26.8 8.2 12 (618) [209]
Epoxy CF Single-layer 0.43 % 4.0 10.2 11.9 $0 [209]
- Cuo/CF - - 1.7 23 8.2 2.4 (7.69) [211]
- Cuo/Co/CF - - 2.0 42.7 10.8 2.7 (9.312) [211]
Epoxy CF Multilayer structure
CFRCfoam,
18.7% 18.0 31.6 16.5 10 (818) [213]
Epoxy CF Double layer: absorbing
layer(ferrites)
substrate layer (CFRP)
60 % 5.0 38 6.9 4.7 (4.5-9.2) [214]
Linear low density polyethylene
(LLDPE)/Ethyleneoctene
copolymer (POE)
SCF Single layer 30% 2.0 15.66 and 17.37 4.6 and 16.4 GHz 1.2 (4.35.5)
and 2.4 (15.417.8)
[217]
Epoxy SCF Double layer: ferrite SCF 0.2% 1.5 (ferrite) 0.5 (SCF) 18.6 16 5.2 (12.818) [129]
Polyurathane (PU) SCF Graded double layer 0.39% 3.35 (1 g paste) 0.65
(11.1 g paste)
32.5 11 4.2 (8.212.4) [41]
Cross-linked PU SWCNT Single layer 5% 2 22 8.8 2.6 (7.510.1) [76]
Cross-linked PU SWCNT Single layer 2% 2 13.8 13.5 3.1 (12.015.1) [76]
Varnish MWCNT Single layer 20% 1 24.27 15.36 4.8 (13.218) [233]
Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) MWCNT Single layer 4% 2 17 7.6 2.7 (6.59.2) [233]
Phthalazinone ethersulfone
ketone (PPESK)
Ni/MWCNT Single layer 15% 0.9 60.07 27.5 10.9 4 (9.513.5) [269]
PPESK MWCNT Single layer 15% 0.9 60.07 17.9 18 2 (16.018.0) [269]
Parafn Low helicity MWCNT Single layer 30% 3 25.78 7.18 14 (418) [90]
Parafn Worm-like MWCNTs Single layer 30% 2.8 26.39 7.71 2.2 (6.89) [90]
Olen MWCNT Single layer - 2 14 8 3 (69) [83]
Olen MWCNT/Co Single layer - 2 16 8 4 (59) [83]
Epoxy MWCNT/Fe Single layer 16.7% 1.2 24.8 11 16 (218) [66]
Epoxy MWCNT/CoFe
2
O
4
Single layer 16.7% 1.4 18 9 7 (6.513.5) [68]
Epoxy MWCN
x
NT/Fe Single layer 16.7% 2 16 9 16 (218) [72]
Epoxy MWCNT/Fe Single layer 16.7% 2 17.5 11 16 (218) [72]
Parafn MWCNTferrite Single layer 40% ferrite 18.6% CNT 2 21.9 8.5 6 (612) [230]
-
c
Fe/MWCNT - 3.5 22.7 15.6 4.2 (13.417.6) [274]
- Fe/Fe
3
C-MWCNT - 2 12.5 9 2.4 (8.110.5) [268]
- MWCNTs/Er
2
O
3
- 2 27.7 10 2.3 (911.3) [264]
- MWCNTs/ Sm
2
O
3
- 2 21.5 9.4 1.6 (8.710.3) [263]
Epoxy MWCNT/Ag Single layer 10% 1 19.2 7.8 1.8 (7.29.0) [265]
Epoxy MWCNT Single layer 5% 1 22.9 11.4 3 (10.113.1) [265]
Epoxy CNT/Co Single layer 10% 1 21.8 12.2 3.4 (10.814.2) [261]
PU MWCNT Sandwich, GFRCPU
foamCFRC
5% 12.9 (0.7 11.5 0.7) 28.7 10 1.4 (9.711.1) [308]
0
6
1
3
0
1
-
1
0
F
.
Q
i
n
a
n
d
C
.
B
r
o
s
s
e
a
u
J
.
A
p
p
l
.
P
h
y
s
.
1
1
1
,
0
6
1
3
0
1
(
2
0
1
2
)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
TABLE 1. Continued.
Matrix Filler Configuration of composite Filler fraction, wt% MT, mm [MA]
max
, dB F, GHz A, GHz Ref.
PU MWCNT Sandwich GFRCPU foam
GFRCCFRC
5% 12.5 (1 10.5 0.8 0.2) 28.5 9.9 1.2 (9.610.8) [308]
PU MWCNT Sandwich GFRCPU
foamGFRC
PU foamCFRC
5% 9.9 (1 2.7 1 5 0.2) 24 9.5 3 (8.711.7) [308]
Epoxy Polyaniline (PANI)/CB Single layer 30% 2 40 11.3 2.9 (10.113) [294]
GFRP CB Double layer 7% (1
st
layer),
5% (2
nd
layer)
0.65 mm1.9 mm 37.5 9.8 2.8 (8.611.4), [128]
Rubber CB Single layer 10% 1.9 22 11.6 3.9(9.613.5) [295]
Natural Rubber CBCarbonyl iron (CI) Double layer 50% CI, 40% CB 2 2 23.3 14.5 5.5 (4.56.5, 12.716.2) [310]
Parafn heat-treated carbon black Single layer 11.1% 6 22 16.2 5.6, 12.418 [305]
Epoxy CBSiC Single layer 5% CB50% SiC 3 41.5 9 6 (713) [299]
poly-(ethylene oxide) (PEO) Chemically reduced graphene Single layer 2.6% 1.8 38.8 16.5 4.1 (13.918) [113]
Ni coated graphene Single layer 1.5 16.5 12 5 (1015) [114]
Phenol-formaldehyde
cement (PFC)
graphite akes Single layer 25% 2 12.7 14.5 4.4 (13.618) [324]
Nomex honeycomb sandwich Carbon microcoil
(A type, Fig. 11(a))
Sandwich 0.007% 9.6 (0.58 7.34 0.58) 18 12.4 3.2 (10.814) [108]
Nomex honeycomb sandwich Carbon microcoil
(B type, Fig. 11(b))
Sandwich 0.007% 9.6 (0.58 7.34 0.58) 13 12.2 3.3 (1114.3) [108]
Nomex honeycomb sandwich
composites
Carbon nanocoil Sandwich 0.007% 9.6 (0.58 7.34 0.58) 32.23 12 9.1 (8.918) [111]
Epoxy CNF (type 1)
d
Single layer 4% 4 26 18.4 1.8 (1819.8) [107]
Epoxy CNF (type 2) Single layer 4% 4 22 16 1.6 (15.216.8) [107]
a
The results summarized here concern primarily the maximum of the MA, the corresponding frequency, and the absorption bandwidth. The table includes results available from the literature up to August 2011.
MT: matching thickness, [MA]
max
: maximum of MA, F: frequency at [MA]
max
, A: absorption bandwidth over 10 dB.
b
The activation procedure is detailed in the corresponding reference.
c
Information on the matrix is missing here because the absorption results are calculated from the permittivity and magnetic permeability rather than direct measurement on planar samples.
d
Type 1 is different from type 2 in terms of dispersion techniques, which are detailed in the corresponding reference.
0
6
1
3
0
1
-
1
1
F
.
Q
i
n
a
n
d
C
.
B
r
o
s
s
e
a
u
J
.
A
p
p
l
.
P
h
y
s
.
1
1
1
,
0
6
1
3
0
1
(
2
0
1
2
)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
the bers and width of the ber strips (see Fig. 4(b)). For an
optimized conguration, 30 dB maximum absorption and
10 GHz (818) bandwidth can be achieved.
212
The combina-
tion of different types of screens is shown to improve the
absorption. It should be noted that although CFs link together
to form a network, such layering of screens will not make
the composite reective but instead will enhance MA. A
similar design concept can be found in a CFRP grid
absorber, consisting of a CFRP grid and absorbing foam.
213
MA characteristics are driven by thickness and geometry of
the unit cell. An optimal geometry has been suggested and
yields a maximum absorption of 31.63 dB with a wide
absorption bandwidth, 818 GHz. Note that although the
absorber shows strong absorption, its relatively large thick-
ness of 18 mm compromises its performance and limits its
applications.
Two nal comments are in order. In Ref. 214, it has
been observed that the double layer absorber containing CF
can achieve impedance match (Fig. 5), whereas the metal-
backed absorber cannot. Thus the absorption is greatly
enhanced. On the other hand, sandwich structure with meso-
phase pitch C foams
215,216
and glass-ber composite (match-
ing layer) exhibit excellent MA.
B. Short-fiber composites
Different from continuous bers, short bers can be
sparsely dispersed as ller particles in the polymeric
matrix and have been extensively explored for MA
applications.
217221
Two main advantages of these materials
are that they allow broadband MA along with signicant
decrease of the absorbers thickness,
41,222
and they have a
high permittivity even at low volume fractions of inclusion.
223
Different approaches to use short CFs for designing
absorbers have been reported. One method is to randomly
disperse them into the host material. Ling et al.
217
reported a
double absorption peak (4.6 and 16.4 GHz) for composites
containing 30 vol. % short CFs, with diameter 5 mm and av-
erage length 60 mm, and respective absorbing peak values
of 15.66 dB and 17.37 dB. However, the corresponding
absorption bandwidths, which are respectively of 1.2 and
2.4 GHz, are narrow. Another method is to integrate them
into multilayer structures, such as Salisbury or Jaumann
structures. Shen et al.
129,218
designed a double layer
absorber consisting of composites containing ferrites and
short CFs, yielding an improved absorption performance as
compared with single layer structures. Furthermore, two-
layer absorbers have a signicantly enhanced absorption
bandwidth. Neo et al.
41,219
analyzed the dielectric properties
of CF-lled polymer composites, based on Lichteneker and
Rothers law (Eq. (2.23) with k !0), and managed to opti-
mize the absorption properties of multilayered structures
containing these materials in terms of the number of layers
FIG. 4. (a) Geometry of the inductive activated CF felt screens (IACFFSs);
(b) Effect of a/b on the microwave absorbing properties of the composites
containing IACFFSs (reprinted with permission from Ref. 212, copyright
2006 Elsevier).
FIG. 5. Smith chart input impedance for a ferrite-epoxy absorber with a
metal plate and CFRP plate as the substrate, respectively (reprinted with per-
mission from Ref. 214, copyright 2007 Wiley and Sons).
061301-12 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
and the thickness of each layer. They found, both experi-
mentally and theoretically, that a 4 mm double-layer struc-
ture shows the best absorption features with maximum
absorption at 32.5 dB and absorption bandwidth covering the
whole X-band. Within this perspective, another study which
should be highlighted here is that of Mitrano and co-work-
ers:
222
They suggested a model based on genetic algorithm
techniques and the MG formula (Eq. (2.22)) for designing a
Jaumann-type CFRP-based multilayer structure to obtain a
broadband absorption.
222
The third approach is to fabricate
hybrid multilayered composite structures by mixing short
CFs and other types of ller particles. In this way, double
layer structures with lossy layers containing mixtures of fer-
rites and short CFs were developed.
218,221,224
For relatively
small loadings of CFs, the absorption performance is signi-
cantly improved. The possibility that short CFs can act like
bridges to link the ferrite particles was suggested to explain
these observations.
The absorption behavior of composites containing short
CFs can be modeled by an appropriate effective medium
analysis, such as those described in Sec. II. In addition,
recent studies have demonstrated the ability of numerical
techniques
225,226
for the design of single layer and multilay-
ered absorbers containing short CFs.
IV. CNT-BASED POLYMER COMPOSITES
As previously mentioned, an important consideration for
the designer of microwave absorbers concerns the absorption
efciency with respect to weight. In this sense, it goes with-
out question that the composite consists of non-corrosive,
lightweight polymer and the nano-scale particles have abso-
lute advantage. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) meet the criterion
essentially. Compared with CB-lled polymers, they have
stronger mechanical properties with typical values of the
elastic modulus of the order of 1 TPa, and tensile strength
within the range 50500 GPa.
227
More important, CNTs can
be fabricated to yield good semiconducting properties with
charge carrier mobility as high as 10
5
cm
2
/Vs, and current
carrying capacity over 10
9
A/cm.
228,229
An immediate benet
associated with loading a polymer matrix with CNT is that
much smaller CNT content % 0:35% is needed to obtain
the same conductivity level than for CB particles % 20% .
This is of particular attraction for one to realize cost-
effective and lightweight absorbers. As CNTs are nonmag-
netic materials, their MA originates either from polarization,
Ohmic losses, or multiple scattering due to the large specic
surface area. We shall note here that the different types of
CNTs have been graded for their use in MA.
230
Compared
with single-walled CNTs (SWCNTs), multi-walled CNTs
(MWCNTs) have more defects due to their complicated
structure and higher permittivity, and their absorption is
mainly due to dielectric relaxation. In a series of papers,
71,231
it has been shown that defects and impurities of CNTs have
become impediments to properly describing the polarization
mechanisms and Ohmic losses of the composite materi-
als.
71,231
The microwave absorption of CNT composites
depends on multiple factors, which will be discussed at
length in what follows.
A. MA properties of CNT-based materials
1. CNT loading dependence
As the amount of CNT increases from below to above the
percolation threshold of composite samples there will be a
signicant impact on their effective dielectric properties and,
hence, their MA characteristics. Such behavior may be
regarded as arising from passage of an insulating state through
a conducting state, as described by Eq. (2.27). However, the
CNT concentration dependence of the permittivity and con-
ductivity data is generally not consistent with the universal
value of t in Eq. (2.27). The role of aggregates
143
and the ther-
mal activation of electrons
232
have been suggested as possible
mechanisms for explaining this discrepancy. Liu et al.
76
found
that the MA can be optimized at a given concentration close
to the percolation threshold and that the absorption peak shifts
with CNT content. These observations are consistent with
other studies.
233
From the published experimental studies it
appears that the loss tangent increases slightly when the CNT
content is below the threshold. With increasing CNT content
in the sample the dielectric losses rapidly increase due to
wave reection rather than absorption. Some experimental
reports
234,235
claim a correlation of the electrical (geometri-
cal) percolation threshold and mechanical (rheological) perco-
lation. Of particular interest is that the dielectric relaxation of
CNT composites is closely associated with the mechanical
damping properties. We shall note that the CNT content de-
pendence of the dielectric loss tangent resembles that of the
elastic modulus loss tangent.
236
As the typical aspect ratio of
CNTs is usually between 100 and 1000, the percolation
threshold is within the range 0.11 vol. %: this corresponds to
maximum tensile strength and Youngs modulus observed for
CNT/epoxy composites.
237239
The observed redshift of the absorption peak with
increasing CNT content can be explained by the increase of
the dielectric losses
240243
according to Eq. (2.16). Few
papers have quantitatively discussed the dependence of the
absorption resonance frequency with CNT content. As
shown in Fig. 6, tting the experimental data of Ref. 76
FIG. 6. (Color online) Dielectric loss dependence of matching frequency.
The solid (red) line is a t of experimental data
76
to Eq. (2.16).
061301-13 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
yields a reasonable agreement with the behavior predicted
by Eq. (2.16). Clearly, the larger is the dielectric loss, the
lower is the matching frequency. Size and thickness polydis-
persity of the CNTs, as well as the experimental uncertainty
related to the microwave characterization can contribute to
discrepancies of the experimental data with Eq. (2.16).
In addition, CNT concentration can be varied to manipu-
late the absorption bandwidth. For example, Liu et al.
76
showed that the absorption bandwidth broadens from 6.48.2
(1.8 GHz) to 7.510.1 (2.6 GHz) to 12.015.1 GHz (3.1 GHz)
for SWCNTs/PU nanocomposites. Thus, a multilayer struc-
ture with optimized wire concentration in each layer is likely
to realize a broadband MA.
2. Geometry of particles
The aspect ratio of CNTs is a crucial parameter in deter-
mining the charge and wave transport mechanisms in such
composite materials. It is generally understood that a large
aspect ratio implies a large excluded volume, dened as the
volume around an object into which the center of another
similar object is not allowed to enter if overlapping of the
two objects is to be avoided. A smaller percolation threshold
/
c
is expected if the aspect ratio is increased. Despite CNT
being an archetypal material, interpretations of the percola-
tion characteristics in CNT-lled polymers vary dramatically
in the literature depending on which theoretical model is
used. The abundance of literature makes it hard to describe
universal features of the percolation characteristics, which
depend on the details of the model and/or material. Speci-
cally, for stick-shaped llers with large aspect ratio (l ) a),
where a is the radius of the stick, and l denotes its length, the
standard EMA theory predicts that,
244
/
c
/ a=l
2
; (4.1)
whereas the MG formula suggests that,
/
c
/ a=l
1=2
: (4.2)
However, computational studies
244247
revealed that,
/
c
/ a=l: (4.3)
Equation (4.3) was veried over a wide range of aspect ratios
for various CF- and CNT-polymer composites.
240,243,248
The
proportionality constant in Eq. (4.3) was found to be equal to
1,
249,250
or to 1.4.
245,249
However, the theoretical prediction
fails in many real nanocomposite systems by either being too
big
250252
(see Fig. 7) or too small.
253,254
The latter can be
conveniently explained by the poor dispersion of the par-
ticles.
255
The former case is worth some discussion. As the
model does not take into account the inter-particle or
the matrix-particle interactions or kinetic effects such as the
Brownian motion of particles, it is a purely statistical per-
colation. A kinetic theory of percolation was introduced to
take into account these effects.
255
Thus, it is not surprising to
nd out that, due to the increasing mobility of shorter wires,
the (kinetic) percolation threshold decreases with decreasing
aspect ratio.
256
Unfortunately, data were obtained over a
limited range of aspect ratios and a precise understanding
of the relationship between the CNT aspect ratio and the
percolation threshold of the composite material is lacking.
The rationale behind these studies is that by uncovering the
detailed inuence of the aspect ratio of CNT on percolation
threshold, theory may provide guidance to experiments and
even suggest new materials with minimum percolation
thresholds at which maximum absorption can be achieved.
The aspect ratio also plays an important role for CNTs
decorated with lled magnetic particles, i.e., a larger aspect
ratio can increase the magnetic anisotropy eld of lled
CNTs, and consequently inuence the absorption features
induced by natural ferromagnetic resonance as inferred by
Eq. (2.11) and Eq. (2.13). Thinner wires will shift the match-
ing frequency higher. However, thin wires will also have
small content of magnetic nanoparticles. This will decrease
the saturation magnetization and shift the matching fre-
quency lower. The overall absorption characteristic is deter-
mined by the competition between these two mechanisms.
The consensus among computational studies suggests
that MA is favored by large tunneling conduction. Hence,
the contact resistance should be minimized. For example,
Kovacs et al.
234
modeled the contact resistance in CNT-
lled composites as,
r
l
2p
2
U
2x1
R R
c

; (4.4)
where r is the dc conductivity, l is the length of the CNT
particle, r and R denote respectively the radius and resistance
of a single particle, R
c
is the contact resistance, x is an empir-
ical numerical constant, and U is the ller volume fraction.
Within this modeling approach, increasing the diameter of
CNTs has the effect of lowering the contact resistance.
3. Dispersion of particles
It is likely that the morphology of the composite mate-
rial is largely dependent on the dispersion procedure of the
FIG. 7. Theoretical prediction of upper and lower bounds for the percolation
threshold (in wt%) as a function of the particle aspect ratio determined from
the excluded volume approach. As a comparison, the experimentally deter-
mined percolation threshold for CVD-grown MWCNTs in an epoxy resin is
shown (reprinted with permission from Ref. 25, copyright 2004 Elsevier).
061301-14 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
CNTs. For low CNT content (smaller than the threshold con-
centration predicted by the kinetic theory of percolation),
dispersion is easily realized. For larger concentrations, the
aggregation mechanism will be of paramount importance to
determine the percolation transition and, hence, the maxi-
mum absorption, which is expected to occur at percolation
threshold. The best dispersion conditions do not necessarily
lead to the maximum tunneling conductivity, because it is
well recognized that a good dispersion leads to the formation
of an insulating polymer layer between the CNTs. This
absorption layer will eventually reduce the conductivity. To
minimize this polymer sheath effect, various processing
techniques, e.g., solvent processing,
235
have been suggested.
The dependence of the MA characteristics on the dispersion
of particles has been reported in many experimental works;
see, e.g., Refs. 107, 233, 236, and 257. Pre-treatment
258
and
stirring rate
234
were found to be important steps of the dis-
persion process. Generally speaking, a good dispersion is
also crucial for the mechanical performance of CNT-based
polymer composites. This and recent research in stretchable
C nanoelectronics has indicated that further progress requires
multidisciplinary programs, incorporating nearly every eld
of traditional study, from chemistry, materials science,
computation, and physics, to mechanical and electrical
engineering.
4. Interfacial properties
From the published theoretical and experimental studies
on polymer composites it is clear that the interphase and
interface properties are governed by the properties of the
polymer, the type of ller particles, and the fabrication pro-
cess. These interface properties will eventually inuence the
MA characteristics. For example, Fan et al.
233
measured the
microwave absorption spectra of CNT/polyethylene tereph-
thalate (PET) and CNT/varnish composite samples with the
same kind of CNTs and very similar fabrication process.
Larger maximum MA was evidenced for the latter. These
observations led to the suggestion that a large density of
boundaries at the interface is essential for a strong interfacial
polarization. The effect of interfacial polarization was also
demonstrated by comparing the MA characteristics of CNT/
polymer and decorated CNT/polymer composites.
87,99,259
B. Magnetically filled or decorated CNTs
Previous publications have considered magnetized
CNTs by lling
66,68,87,97,259268
or coating
100,101,269272
hollow
CNTs with nanoparticles or nanowires, or unpuried CNTs
with Fe catalyst.
65,257,273
Some of these publications have
indicated that MA is greatly enhanced because of the contribu-
tions of magnetic losses and impedance match (see
Fig. 8).
66,68,87,271,273
For instance, Lin and co-workers
274
reported an enhanced absorption for Fe-lled CNTs compared
with unlled CNTs. It is worth asking if this larger absorption
is due to the magnetic phase. From Eqs. (2.11) and (2.16) one
can show that the answer is that this is not due to the contribu-
tion of the magnetic losses but rather to the increased dielectric
losses. The magnetic particles content is so small that the mag-
netic effects are weak.
83,259,275277
A similar conclusion was
arrived at by Naab and co-workers
278
for similar materials. The
increase of the static magnetization saturation
279,280
and the
dielectric/magnetic losses as the concentration of lled or
coated magnetic particles is increased highlights the complex
interplay between dielectric and magnetic properties and disor-
der.
281
Another area where this interplay has a profound impact
is the signicant increase of coercivity for polymers containing
magnetically loaded CNTs compared with polymers containing
only magnetic particles;
279,280
this has potential for MA
because larger hysteresis losses have been reported.
35,263
Other
mechanisms that could contribute to MA with lled CNTs
include defects that are introduced during the lling process,
which will be the source of multiple scattering and induce inter-
facial polarization;
231,259,282
and the local properties of nanopar-
ticles, which are greatly modied by the quantum connement
effect. Kubo theory
283
predicts that the discrete energy levels of
the encapsulated nanoparticles in the CNTs will absorb the
microwave energy through electrons hopping. It is worth noting
that because these effects are not limited to magnetic nanopar-
ticles, various experiments were performed on CNTs lled with
different kinds of nanoparticles including Ag,
265
Sn,
94
,
Sm
2
O
3
,
263
and Er
2
O
3
,
264
and interesting phenomena such as
enhanced absorption bandwidth
94,263
were observed. However,
it should be noted that the resultant MA performances can be
FIG. 8. MA characteristics over the 218 GHz band of CoFe
2
O
4
particles,
pure CNTs and CNTs/CoFe
2
O
4
nanocomposites (a) and the high-resolution
transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) image of the CNT shows
graphite shells and lattice fringes of CoFe
2
O
4
(b) (reprinted with permission
from Ref. 68, copyright 2006 American Institute of Physics).
061301-15 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
degraded due to the destruction of the CNT integrity during the
lling and decoration processes.
265
Today, our knowledge of the impact of magnetically lled
or decorated CNTs on MA remains limited. Little is known
about the nature of the transition between a situation for which
the absorption mechanism is driven by magnetic losses to its
counterpart, for which dielectric losses are the main contributor
for MA. In the former, the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert formal-
ism,
284
Snoeks law,
135
the Kittel equation,
132
and the effective
medium theory dealing with magnetic permeability should be
considered to evaluate the electromagnetic properties of such
absorbents.
285289
It is also benecial to ask if there is an alter-
native way to circumvent the complex chemical process of dop-
ing CNTs but still be able to take advantage of magnetic
absorbents in order to increase the MA of CNTs. Polymer mat-
rices with embedded ceramic or inorganic ller particles, e.g.,
ZnO (Ref. 290) or TiO
2
,
82
are widely explored materials for
dielectric and magnetic applications.
291
However, a better solu-
tion is to design multilayer structures. Within this context, Park
et al.
292
showed that a sandwich structure (see Fig. 9) with front
layer containing CB particles and several layers of foam con-
taining CNTs achieves excellent MA performances.
V. CB-BASED POLYMER COMPOSITES
Carbon black (CB) particles are common ller particles
used for modifying the mechanical, electrical, and optical
properties of a polymer matrix into which they are dis-
persed.
15,43,293
MA is another important application. Com-
pared with magnetic ferrites, CB particles will lead to a
broader frequency range of application up to the THz (infra-
red) due to their very ne primary particle size (typically,
10 nm) and much smaller density ($2 g/cm
3
). However, their
narrow absorption bandwidth is unfavorable. Then, one has
to resort to multilayer structures in order to broaden the
absorption band. In what follows, we shall discuss MA of
CB composites with single layer and multilayer structures
separately.
A. Single layer microwave absorber
Wu et al.
294
fabricated core-shell polyaniline/CB nano-
composites and found that the maximum absorption of 40 dB
is observed within the X-band with CB concentration of
30 wt. %. However, the absorption bandwidth is quite narrow
(3 GHz). Adding 6 vol. % CB into a glass/epoxy matrix
yields a sample with a maximum absorption of 32 dB within
the X-band and 2.7 GHz absorption bandwidth.
128
Kwon
295
showed that CB/silicone rubber exhibits a 24 dB minimum
reection loss within the X-band and 3.9 GHz absorption
bandwidth. Of particular interest is the observation that these
measurements concern supercolative CB-lled polymer sam-
ples for X-band absorption. These measurements can be
understood by considering that, for low CB volume fractions,
an increase of CB will increase the conductivity by tunnel-
ing, which favors MA. A large CB concentration will pre-
vent the wave from propagating into the absorber due to the
front surface reection. As evident from these measure-
ments, the observed percolation threshold in CB-based
absorbers can be very rich and, as discussed in many
places,
143,155,296,297
the corresponding mechanical, elec-
tronic, and transport properties of percolating networks are
strongly affected by the system percolation. It is well estab-
lished that the ller dispersion becomes difcult for CB con-
centrations well away from the percolation threshold and this
is detrimental to the improvement of the mechanical proper-
ties observed at low CB volume fractions.
298300
From a
practical perspective, we note that our work
123
and recent
results by other groups indicated that improving the MA of
CB-lled composites can be realized by catalyzing the CB
particles with SiC,
301
BaTiO
3
,
302
Fe(Co)
5
,
220,301304
nano-
sized Fe,
305
and ferrite
304,306
particles, which have better
MA performance and larger percolation threshold. On the
other hand, some experiments also showed that that the
absorption features of these composites can be precisely con-
trolled with mechanical stress.
307
The ability to control
the CB mesostructure will be instrumental in developing
CB-based polymer materials for MA.
B. Multilayer microwave absorbers
In general, a multilayer microwave absorber is charac-
terized by a set of layers with different MA materials in
order to enhance the overall absorption features. As was
briey mentioned in Sec. II A, one of the main issues for the
design of such absorbers lies in the minimization of the over-
all reection coefcient in a specic frequency range and a
specic range of incidence angles. The front layer is
expected to give the best impedance match, while the
absorbing layer is supposed to dissipate the microwave
energy as much as possible, and the substrate layer is
expected to be reective to prevent any escape of the micro-
wave. In Ref. 128 (CB2), Oh et al. proposed a double-layer
FIG. 9. Schematic designs of sandwich structured absorbers. The surface
layer consists of glass fabric with carbon black. CB6 and CB5 represents
6 wt% and 5 wt% carbon black, respectively. The main absorbing layer is
PU foam containing MWCNT. The substrate is carbon bre reinforced poly-
mer (CFRP). The sequence and thickness of each model is labelled in the
graph (reprinted with permission from Ref. 308, copyright 2006 Elsevier).
061301-16 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
structure with the same CB/glass/epoxy composite but with
different CB contents. However, it failed to exhibit better
absorption properties than the single layer of the same thick-
ness at optimized content. A multilayer structure consisting
of a thermosetting resin-impregnated brous sheet (such as
glass ber reinforced polymer (GFRC)), a rubber sheet with
CB, and a reinforced resin sheet (such as CFRP) was also
suggested as an efcient microwave absorber.
308
The two
main advantages of these structures are as follows: (i) the
surface layer can act as a matching layer to improve the
absorption as well as to reduce the total thickness of the
absorber;
309
and (ii) more possibilities are available to opti-
mize the MA characteristics. For example, with a double
layer structure containing carbonyl-iron and CB, respec-
tively, we can tune the microwave absorption feature by
varying the parameters of each layer, such as the thickness
ratio and ller content
310
(see Fig. 10). As was found simi-
larly for the case of single layers, other type of llers, e.g.,
SnO
2
,
311
can be exploited to modulate the electromagnetic
parameters of double-layer structures.
VI. OTHER TYPES OF C-BASED POLYMER
COMPOSITES
As previously noted, recent experiments on polymers
lled with conducting components structured at the nano-
scale have shown that these materials form an interesting
class of broadband microwave absorbers.
312
Compared with
absorbents that are structured at larger length scales,
nanocarbon-based composites involve complex absorption
mechanisms related to a hierarchy of scale.
313,314
This is for
many reasons. First, quasi-particles, such as plasmons or
polaritons, rather than the free electrons, are responsible for
the charge transport mechanisms. Second, the macroscopic
(effective) behavior of the composite should be analyzed
within the framework of nano-electromagnetism rather than
based on classical electromagnetism. Third, the tunneling
effect can be important due to the formation of multi-
channels. However, the difculty in dispersing these llers
in polymers can be detrimental to their expected MA per-
formance. All these characteristics distinguish nanocarbon
particles from the micro- and macro-carbonaceous particle
llers. In the following, we discuss some salient features of
the MA properties of such materials.
A. C micro-/nano-coils
Carbon coils (see, e.g., Fig. 11) can be fabricated by the
CVD technique at the micro- or nanoscale. Various electro-
magnetic and MA experiments were performed on C micro-
coils.
108,315,316
These experiments suggested that the absorp-
tion properties depend on the chirality of the micro-coils,
which inuences their dielectric behavior. However, the MA
FIG. 10. (Color) RL curves of double-layer absorber containing CB par-
ticles and carbonyl iron (CI) particles #1#6, of which the thickness of the
matching layer and the absorbing layer is uniform 2 mm. (a) The mass frac-
tion of CI in the matching layer is set to 50%, the mass fraction of CB in the
absorbing layer of samples #1, #2 and #3 are 40%, 50% and 60%, respec-
tively. (b) The mass fraction of CI in the matching layer is set to 70%, the
mass fraction of CB in the absorbing layer of samples #4, #5 and #6 are
40%, 50% and 60%, respectively (reprinted with permission from Ref. 310,
copyright 2009 Elsevier).
FIG. 11. SEM images of C micro-coils with different chiralities, obtained by a
vapor phase catalytic cracking process with different gas ow rate. (a) the coil
diameter is 4 mm, pitch is about 0.5-0.8 l/mm. It was produced with gas ow
rate of 150 ml/min. (b) the coil diameter is 20 mm, pitch is about 1-4 l/m. It
was produced with gas ow rate of 200 ml/min (reprinted with permission
from Ref. 108, copyright 2005 Chinese Academy of Sciences).
061301-17 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
properties are not impressive, with a small bandwidth of
1015 GHz and a maximum absorption of 18 dB. Nano-coils
were also explored for MA application.
109111
These studies
revealed that they exhibit superior MA than micro-coils. For
example, Zhao et al.
111
measured the microwave properties
of Nomex honeycomb sandwich composites lled with C
nano-coils and found that their reection loss has the absorp-
tion bandwidth of 8.918 GHz and a maximum absorption of
32.23 dB at 12 GHz. The substrate and front layer of this
composite structure contain glass bers. The absorption
could be enhanced if glass bers are substituted with CFs for
the substrate layer. Because C coil is a dielectrically lossy
material, coating or catalyzing it with magnetic particles rep-
resents an effective method to improve the MA performance
of polymer composites containing such ller particles.
109,112
B. Onion-like C
Soon after the discovery of onion-like C (OLC) by Kuz-
netsov et al.,
317
electromagnetic studies were performed for
shielding and MA application. OLCs are quasi-spherical
nanoparticles consisting of fullerene-like C layers enclosed
by concentric graphitic shells (Fig. 12). They are predicted
to have different properties from other C nanostructures,
such as graphite, nano-diamond, or CNTs, due to their highly
symmetric structure and may serve uses in different applica-
tions. OLCs can even serve as nanocapsules for drug
delivery systemsthe external graphite layers providing
protection to substances contained within and possibly serv-
ing as a template for the attachment of desirable functional
groups. Until recently the investigation of the unique chemi-
cal and physical properties of OLCs was limited by the lack
of a method that produced them with well-ordered structures
and in sufciently large quantities. Several recent publica-
tions have shown that magnetic nanoparticles encapsulated
within graphite-like layers may nd applications as micro-
wave absorption materials,
318
particularly in the Ka band
which covers the frequencies of 26.540 GHz.
104,319
From
the published experimental studies it is clear that OLCs are
characterized by complex frequency dispersion consistent
with their structure. It was suggested that the MA depends
on a variety of parameters. For instance, increasing the nano-
diamond annealing temperature will promote the extent of
graphitization and the amount of conductive channels within
OLC aggregates, i.e., with annealing temperature increased
from 1400 K to 1800 K, the transmission minimum at
28 GHz decreased from 3 to 13 dB.
314
These experiments
also suggest that aggregate size plays a key role. That is,
larger sizes result in larger polarization,
320
and consequently
larger absorption, e.g., the maximum attenuation at Ka band
was found to increase by 20% when the aggregate size is
increased from 85 to 180 nm.
104
Other observations reveal
that metallic admixtures such as Cr or Fe have strong
impacts on MA. At the Ka band, it was reported
319
that OLC
powders with Fe admixtures present larger attenuation
($4050 dB) than pure OLCs, or OLCs containing other
admixtures. Compared with conventional absorbents such as
iron carbonyl, OLCs present superior MA performances in
the Ka band. Now, what happens when OLCs are embedded
in a polymer matrix? It was reported that when the OLC
concentration is sufciently large ($20 wt. %), smaller
aggregates reduce the percolation threshold,
104
and increase
the MA.
314
It can be drawn from these experimental results
that the electromagnetic response of OLCs and their compo-
sites with polymers can be modulated by annealing tempera-
ture, aggregate size, and of course the types of the initial
diamonds and polymer matrix.
C. C nanofibers
In analogy to CNTs, C nanobers (CNFs) are a one-
dimensional nanocarbon material, characterized with a large
aspect ratio, high mechanical properties, and excellent elec-
trical and thermal properties.
321
However, because CNFs
have a higher density of defects compared to CNTs, their
mechanical properties are reduced. However, one major
advantages of CNFs is their availability and cheaper produc-
tion cost relative to CNTs. The large aspect ratio of the
CNFs promotes larger conductivity and permittivity and a
smaller percolation threshold compared with CNTs. Over the
frequency range 0.518 GHz, a maximum absorption of
18 dB was found close to 10 GHz for CNF/epoxy compo-
sites.
322
This is not as good as for CNT/epoxy and CB/epoxy
composites fabricated in the same conditions, but they
achieve equal absorption bandwidth of 3 GHz for smaller l-
ler loading and matching thickness. As with other types of
nanoparticles, some experimental reports claim that the MA
features of CNF-lled composites are related to the ller
content and dispersion quality. For instance, Nanni et al.
107
reported an improvement of the maximum absorption,
increasing from 0.2 to 18.3 dB over the 820 GHz bandwidth
when the CNF content is increased from 1 wt. % to 4 wt. %
for CNF/epoxy composites. Additionally, these authors
showed that a better dispersion of CNFs into the polymer
permits obtainment of a higher permittivity and a larger MA.
To improve the absorption efciency of CNFs, researchers
also tried to mix them with magnetic absorbents.
323
Both
FIG. 12. HRTEM image of onion-like C powder, which was produced by
annealing of nanodiamonds powder in vacuum at 1800 K (reprinted with
permission from Ref. 318, copyright 2009 Elsevier).
061301-18 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
absorption maximum and bandwidth were found to be signif-
icantly enhanced for a specic mixing ratio. In view of the
likely economic feasibility of CNFs, these materials are via-
ble solutions for microwave absorbers.
D. Graphite
A couple of studies have been devoted to aky graphite.
In the rst one, Fan et al.
324
prepared a phenol-formaldehyde
cement based absorber using ball-milled aky graphite. This
leads to a maximum absorption of 25.5 dB at 14.5 GHz and
absorption bandwidth of 2.9 GHz. A longer ball-milling time
along with a good dispersion of graphite increased the MA. In
the second study, expanded graphite ake/novalac-phenolic
resin was explored.
325
It was shown that this composite mate-
rial exhibits a dielectric loss tangent larger than unity and
absorption smaller than 10 dB in the whole X-band range.
VII. SUMMARYAND FUTURE PROSPECTS
In this review, we have discussed fundamentals of MA and
reported on the development of C-based microwave absorbers.
The development of polymers lled with carbonaceous nano-
structures with tailored dielectric, magnetic, and MA properties
represents a key issue in many technological elds. We have
critically examined both theoretical and experimental aspects
of these topics. On the experimental side we have reviewed
state-of-the-art experiments and stressed the difculty and open
questions in analyzing such experiments. Four interesting fea-
tures of polymer composites lled with carbonaceous particles
are their lightweight structures, their moldability, their thin
matching thickness, and their broad bandwidth; however, most
of the experimental results point out that the carbonaceous ma-
terial needs to be doped or surface modied, for example,
CNTs decorated by magnetic particles, in order to have strong
MA. Even if these smart materials are promising electromag-
netic wave absorbers in the laboratory, it remains a challenge to
develop suitable techniques for mass production of these
polymer-lled nanocomposites.
A. Future prospects
We note that active development in this eld has already
successfully demonstrated the great promise of graphene-
polymer composites for a range of technological advances,
from electronic devices to biosensors.
326330
Of particular in-
terest to us is that researchers have found applications of gra-
phene in microwave absorption. For example, the authors of
Ref. 113 reported a 38.8 dB absorption at 16 GHz with 2.6
vol. % graphene content. Another, more recent, batch of
microwave experiments was conducted on nickel-coated gra-
phene
114
It was demonstrated that MA is due to dielectric
losses, and that nickel coating transforms the graphene from
paramagnetic to ferromagnetic, thus improving the maximum
absorption from 6.5 dB to 16.5 dB at 118 GHz. Zhang
et al.
115
fabricated PMMA/graphene composites (see Figure
13) and found that when the matching thickness is 1.5 mm
and graphene content is 1.8 vol. %, the maximum absorption
is 18 dB at 9.25 GHz and the frequency region in which the
maximum reection loss is more than 10 dB is 9.514.6 GHz.
These experiments that have appeared recently are certainly a
good start, but more are needed in order to have a good mech-
anistic understanding in terms of absorption process and to
optimize the absorption performance.
Other interesting applications such as microwave-
assisted purication and functionalization of CNT par-
ticles,
231,331
or microwave curing of composites,
78,332
add to
the importance and interest of this research eld. Similarly,
multilayer structures offer us unlimited possibilities by intro-
ducing more degrees of freedom for controlling and eventu-
ally ne-tuning the MA characteristics. As commented by
Hirsch,
3
it is likely many novel forms of C will be discov-
ered. Synthetic C allotropes represent a family of fascinating
and esthetically pleasing architectures with outstanding
materials properties.
B. Final thoughts
These last few examplesand what we have discussed
in this reviewshow that the quest to understand MA in
polymer composites lled with carbonaceous materials is far
FIG. 13. (a) SEM image of the cross-section of PMMA nanocomposite
microcellular foam with 1.8 vol % graphene sheets; (b) TEM image of well-
dispersed graphene sheets in a cell wall of the PMMA nanocomposite
micro-cellular foam with 0.8 vol % graphene sheets. The arrows point to the
cell wall surfaces (reprinted with permission from Ref. 115, copyright 2011
American Chemical Society).
061301-19 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
from over. One of the characteristics of these soft materials
is that they have developed in the hands of scientists with
backgrounds in organic chemistry and materials science; this
group is particularly inclined philosophically to mixing. A
characteristic of this work has been its focus on the function
rather than on structure. Regarding technological applica-
tions, nding materials that show either very good MA (for
camouage applications) or very poor MA (for invisibility
cloaks)
333
is needed. There is clearly a need to advance our
theoretical tools substantially. Parallel to the experimental
achievements and insights, the community of plastic nanoe-
lectronics should develop powerful ab initio multifunctional
computational approaches that capture the underlying
physics. On the basis of our longtime experience with the
computational analysis of dielectric heterostructures,
334
we
consider that it is a major undertaking to examine the model-
ing of the effects of strain of carbonaceous materials lled
polymers by multiscale numerical simulation, e.g., Monte
Carlo and molecular dynamics techniques. The multiscale
geometry of these materials is expected to have a signicant
effect on their transport properties. The formation of cracks
under tension, or of bending fatigue tests, eventually affect
the electrical and electromagnetic properties.
307,335
System-
atic ageing studies on polymeric materials are especially in-
formative because the failure mechanisms can be tracked.
The damage and fracture behavior of materials characterized
by microscopic structural disorder is determined by the dis-
tribution properties at the scale of the microstructure. Accu-
rate predicting of the collective chain dynamics of the
elasticity networkthe local strain eld produced by the
external stressis key to predictive modeling of physical
aging in C-lled polymers.
Because of the rapid developments in fundamental sci-
ence and technology and interdisciplinary nature of the eld,
it is formidable to give an exact prediction of future direc-
tions. However, there is no doubt that ingenious ideas will be
put forth and lead to, say, novel nanostructures with opti-
mized MA.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Lab-STICC is UMR CNRS 6185. We acknowledge sup-
port from the Conseil General du Finiste`re post-doctoral fel-
lowship program.
1
A. K. Geim, Science 324, 1530 (2009).
2
F. Diederich and M. Kivala, Adv. Mater. 22, 803 (2010).
3
A. Hirsch, Nature Mater. 9, 868 (2010).
4
W. L. Mao, H.-k. Mao, P. J. Eng, T. P. Trainor, M. Newville, C.-C. Kao,
D. L. Heinz, J. Shu, Y. Meng, and R. J. Hemley, Science 302, 425 (2003).
5
A. K. Geim and K. S. Novoselov, Nature Mater. 6, 183 (2007).
6
K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, M. I. Katsnelson,
I. V. Grigorieva, S. V. Dubonos, and A. A. Firsov, Nature 438, 197
(2005).
7
A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K.
Geim, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009).
8
S. Iijima, Nature 354, 56 (1991).
9
S. Iijima, P. M. Ajayan, and T. Ichihashi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3100
(1992).
10
X. Li, W. Cai, J. An, S. Kim, J. Nah, D. Yang, R. Piner, A. Velamakanni,
I. Jung, E. Tutuc, S. K. Banerjee, L. Colombo, and R. S. Ruoff, Science
324, 1312 (2009).
11
C. Brosseau, in Prospects in Filled Polymers Engineering: Mesostruc-
ture, Elasticity Network, and Macroscopic Properties, edited by C. Bros-
seau (Research Signpost, Trivandrum, India, 2008), pp. 177227.
12
E. Sichel, J. Gittleman, and P. Sheng, J. Electron. Mater. 11, 699 (1982).
13
J. B. Donnet, Compos. Sci. Technol. 63, 1085 (2003).
14
E. K. Sichel, J. I. Gittleman, and P. Sheng, Phys. Rev. B 18, 5712 (1978).
15
E. K. Sichel, Carbon Black Polymer Composites (Marcel Dekker, New
York, 1982).
16
R. H. Norman, Conductive Rubber and Plastics (Elsevier, New York,
1970).
17
C. Brosseau, F. Boulic, P. Queffelec, C. Bourbigot, Y. Le Mest, J. Loaec,
and A. Beroual, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 882 (1997).
18
C. Brosseau, P. Molinie, F. Boulic, and F. Carmona, J. Appl. Phys. 89,
8297 (2001).
19
F. Boulic, C. Brosseau, Y. L. Mest, J. Loaec, and F. Carmona, J. Phys. D:
Appl. Phys. 31, 1904 (1998).
20
K. Guido, Prog. Polym. Sci. 28, 83 (2003).
21
J. Obrzut, J. F. Douglas, S. B. Kharchenko, and K. B. Migler, Phys. Rev.
B 76, 195420 (2007).
22
D. Jeulin and L. Savary, J. Phys. I France 7, 1123 (1997).
23
F. Houze, R. Meyer, O. Schneegans, and L. Boyer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69,
1975 (1996).
24
R. Viswanathan and M. B. Heaney, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4433 (1995).
25
I. Balberg and J. Blanc, Phys. Rev. B 31, 8295 (1985).
26
F. Carmona and J. Ravier, Carbon 40, 151 (2002).
27
J. Ravier, F. Houz, F. Carmona, O. Schneegans, and H. Saadaoui, Carbon
39, 314 (2001).
28
J. Smit and H. P. J. Wijn, Ferrites: Physical Properties of Ferromagnetic
Oxides in Relation to their Technical Applications (Philips Technical
Library, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1959).
29
B. Lax and K. J. Button, Microwave ferrites and ferrimagnetics
(McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962).
30
M. R. Meshram, N. K. Agrawal, B. Sinha, and P. S. Misra, J. Magn.
Magn. Mater. 271, 207 (2004).
31
T. Kagotani, D. Fujiwara, S. Sugimoto, K. Inomata, and M. Homma,
J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 272276, E1813 (2004).
32
Z. Haijun, L. Zhichao, M. Chengliang, Y. Xi, Z. Liangying, and W. Min-
gzhong, Mater. Sci. Eng., B 96, 289 (2002).
33
S. P. Ruan, B. K. Xu, H. Suo, F. Q. Wu, S. Q. Xiang, and M. Y. Zhao,
J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 212, 175 (2000).
34
P. Singh, V. K. Babbar, A. Razdan, S. L. Srivastava, and T. C. Goel,
Mater. Sci. Eng., B 78, 70 (2000).
35
P. Singh, V. K. Babbar, A. Razdan, R. K. Puri, and T. C. Goel, J. Appl.
Phys. 87, 4362 (2000).
36
S. M. Abbas, R. Chatterjee, A. K. Dixit, A. V. R. Kumar, and T. C. Goel,
J. Appl. Phys. 101, 074105 (2007).
37
J. Y. Shin and J. H. Oh, IEEE Trans. Magn. 29, 3437 (1993).
38
M. B. Amin and J. R. James, Radio Electron. Eng. 51, 209 (1981).
39
S. S. Kim, S. B. Jo, K. I. Gueon, K. K. Choi, J. M. Kim, and K. S. Churn,
IEEE Trans. Magn. 27, 5462 (1991).
40
H. S. Cho and S. S. Kim, IEEE Trans. Magn. 35, 3151 (1999).
41
C. P. Neo and V. K. Varadan, IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 46, 102
(2004).
42
V. B. Bregar, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 1679 (2004).
43
S. Wolff and M. J. Wang, Carbon Black, Science and Technology, 2nd
ed. (Dekker, New York, 1993).
44
F. J. Guild, in Polymer Blends, edited by D. R. Paul and C. B. Bucknall
(Wiley, New York, 2000), Vol. 2, Chap. 19, p. 116.
45
G. Wypych, Handbook of Fillers (ChemTec, Toronto, 1999).
46
M. J. Wang, Rubber Chem. Technol. 71, 520 (1998).
47
S. Redner, Physics of Finely Divided Matter (Springer-Verlag, Berlin,
1985).
48
T. S. Chow, Mesoscopic Physics of Complex Materials (Springer, New
York, 2000).
49
L. Karasek and M. Sumita, J. Mater. Sci. 31, 281 (1996).
50
K. Miyasaka, K. Watanabe, E. Jojima, H. Aida, M. Sumita, and K. Ishi-
kawa, J. Mater. Sci. 17, 1610 (1982).
51
M. Sumita, H. Abe, H. Kayaki, and K. Miyasaka, J. Macromol. Sci.,
Phys. B 25, 171 (1986).
52
A. Kumar, Electron. Lett. 23, 184 (1987).
53
C. Brosseau, Prospects in Filled Polymers Engineering: Mesostructure,
Elasticity Network, and Macroscopic Properties (Research Signpost,
Trivandrum, India, 2008).
54
I. J. Youngs and S. Bleay, Mater. World 10, 12 (2002).
061301-20 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
55
P. G. Lederer, An Introduction to Radar Absorbent Materials (RAM)
(Royal Signals and Radar Establishment, Malvern, England, 1986).
56
K. Gaylor, Radar Absorbing MaterialsMechanisms and Materials
(DSTO Materials Research Laboratory, Victoria, Australia, 1989).
57
E. F. Knott, J. F. Shaeffer, and M. T. Tuley, Radar Cross Section, 2nd
rev. ed. (Artech House, Norwood, England, 1993).
58
K. J. Vinoy and R. M. Jha, Radar Absorbing MaterialsFrom Theory to
Design and Characterization (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA,
1996).
59
W. Emerson, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 21, 484-490 (1973).
60
N. V. Machinerieen, FR Pat. No. 802728 (1936).
61
R. Stonier, SAMPE J. 27, 9 (1991).
62
O. Halpern, U.S. Pat. No. 2,923,934 entitled Method and Means For
Minimizing Reection of High Frequency Radio Waves (1960).
63
H. V. G. Stubbs, B. V. A. Wickenden, W. G. Howell, and E. D. Perry,
UK Patent No. 2058469A (1981).
64
J. N. Dahiya, R. Athinarayanan, J. A. Roberts, J. N. Tour, and D. W.
Price, in Microwave and Optical Technology 2003, Vol. 5445,
edited by J. Pistora, K. Postava, M. Hrabovsky, and B. S. Rawat
(SPIEInternational Society of Optical Engineering, Bellingham, WA,
2003), pp. 3237.
65
A. Wadhawan, D. Garrett, and J. M. Perez, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 2683
(2003).
66
R. C. Che, L. M. Peng, X. F. Duan, Q. Chen, and X. L. Liang, Adv.
Mater. 16, 401 (2004).
67
A. Anand, J. A. Roberts, F. Naab, J. N. Dahiya, O. W. Holland, and F. D.
McDaniel, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 241, 511 (2005).
68
R. C. Che, C. Y. Zhi, C. Y. Liang, and X. G. Zhou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88,
033105 (2006).
69
I. V. Korotash, M. M. Nyshchenko, E. M. Rudenko, O. I. Rzheshevska,
G. P. Prykhodko, and N. A. Gavrylyuk, Metalloz. Noveishie Tekhnol.
28, 545 (2006).
70
D. A. Makeiff and T. Huber, Synth. Met. 156, 497 (2006).
71
Z. Ye, W. D. Deering, A. Krokhin, and J. A. Roberts, Phys. Rev. B 74,
075425 (2006).
72
R. C. Che, C. Y. Liang, H. L. Shi, X. G. Zhou, and X. N. Yang, Nano-
technology 18, 355705 (2007).
73
B. Corzilius, S. Agarwal, K. P. Dinse, and K. Hata, Phys. Status Solidi B
244, 3890 (2007).
74
B. Corzilius, K. P. Dinse, J. van Slageren, and K. Hata, Phys. Rev. B 75,
7 (2007).
75
S. Gupta, N. Al Moayed, U. Khan, M. Obol, M. Asfar, and IEEE, Com-
plex Permittivity and Permeability of Single- and Multi-Walled Carbon
Nanotubes at High Microwave Frequencies and Quantifying Microwave
Absorption (IEEE, New York, 2007).
76
Z. F. Liu, G. Bai, Y. Huang, F. F. Li, Y. F. Ma, T. Y. Guo, X. B. He, X.
Lin, H. J. Gao, and Y. S. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 13696 (2007).
77
B. Corzilius, K. P. Dinse, and K. Hata, Physica E 40, 2327 (2008).
78
A. L. Higginbotham, P. G. Moloney, M. C. Waid, J. G. Duque, C. Kittrell,
H. K. Schmidt, J. J. Stephenson, S. Arepalli, L. L. Yowell, and J. M.
Tour, Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 3087 (2008).
79
Y. J. Li, C. Z. Zhu, and C. M. Wang, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41, 125303
(2008).
80
K. R. Paton and A. H. Windle, Carbon 46, 1935 (2008).
81
Z. H. Peng, J. C. Peng, Y. F. Peng, Y. Y. Ou, and Y. T. Ning, Phys. Lett.
A 372, 3714 (2008).
82
S. W. Phang, M. Tadokoro, J. Watanabe, and N. Kuramoto, Synth. Met.
158, 251 (2008).
83
Z. Zheng, B. Xu, L. Huang, L. He, and X. M. Ni, Solid State Sci. 10, 316
(2008).
84
X. C. Gui, W. Ye, J. Q. Wei, K. L. Wang, R. T. Lv, H. W. Zhu, F. Y.
Kang, J. L. Gu, and D. H. Wu, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42, 5 (2009).
85
Y. Li, C. X. Chen, X. Y. Pan, Y. W. Ni, S. Zhang, J. Huang, D. Chen, and
Y. F. Zhang, Physica B 404, 1343 (2009).
86
A. Moradi, Phys. Plasmas 16, 054705 (2009).
87
T. N. Narayanan, V. Sunny, M. M. Shaijumon, P. M. Ajayan, and M. R.
Anantharaman, Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 12, K21 (2009).
88
B. R. Priya and H. J. Byrne, J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 7134 (2009).
89
X. S. Qi, Y. Deng, W. Zhong, Y. Yang, C. A. Qin, C. Au, and Y. W. Du,
J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 808 (2009).
90
X. S. Qi, Y. Yang, W. Zhong, Y. Deng, C. T. Au, and Y. W. Do, J. Solid
State Chem. 182, 2691 (2009).
91
M. V. Shuba, S. A. Maksimenko, and G. Y. Slepyan, J. Comput. Theor.
Nanosci. 6, 2016 (2009).
92
W. L. Song, M. S. Cao, Z. L. Hou, J. Yuan, and X. Y. Fang, Scr. Mater.
61, 201 (2009).
93
H. Y. Zhang, G. X. Zeng, Y. Ge, T. L. Chen, and L. C. Hu, J. Appl. Phys.
105, 054313 (2009).
94
H. Zhu, L. Zhang, L. Z. Zhang, Y. Song, Y. Huang, and Y. M. Zhang,
Mater. Lett. 64, 227 (2009).
95
X. C. Gui, K. L. Wang, A. Y. Cao, J. Q. Wei, R. T. Lv, F. Y. Kang,
Q. K. Shu, Y. Jia, and D. H. Wu, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 10, 1808
(2010).
96
H. F. Li, J. A. Wang, Y. H. Huang, X. Q. Yan, J. J. Qi, J. Liu, and Y.
Zhang, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 175, 81 (2010).
97
R. T. Lv, F. Y. Kang, J. L. Gu, K. L. Wang, and D. H. Wu, Sci. China-
Technol. Sci. 53, 1453 (2010).
98
Z. Ye, Z. Li, J. A. Roberts, P. Zhang, J. T. Wang, and G. L. Zhao,
J. Appl. Phys. 108, 7 (2010).
99
C. L. Zhu, M. L. Zhang, Y. J. Qiao, G. Xiao, F. Zhang, and Y. J. Chen,
J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 16229 (2010).
100
C. Bi, M. F. Zhu, Q. H. Zhang, Y. G. Li, and H. Z. Wang, Mater. Chem.
Phys. 126, 596 (2011).
101
C. Bi, M. F. Zhu, Q. H. Zhang, Y. G. Li, and H. Z. Wang, J. Nanosci.
Nanotechnol. 11, 1030 (2011).
102
K. Q. He, L. M. Yu, L. M. Sheng, K. An, Y. Ando, and X. L. Zhao, Jpn.
J. Appl. Phys. 49, 125101 (2011).
103
A. Y. Ge, B. S. Xu, X. M. Wang, T. B. Li, P. D. Han, and X. G. Liu, Acta
Phys. Chim. Sin. 22, 203 (2006).
104
D. S. Bychanok, S. I. Moseenkov, V. L. Kuznetsov, P. P. Kuzhir, S. A.
Maksimenko, K. G. Batrakov, O. V. Ruhavets, A. V. Gusinski, O. Shen-
derova, and P. Lambin, J. Nanoelectron. Optoelectron. 4, 257 (2009).
105
Q. W. Chen, Y. Chen, and F. Y. Cao, Alignment of Fe
3
O
4
-Carbon
Coaxial Nanobres in a Polymer for Improving Microwave Absorption
(IEEE, New York, 2007).
106
Y. Biryulin, D. Kurdybaylo, T. Volkova, L. Sharonova, V. Shamanin, E.
Terukov, G. Aleksjuk, A. Prikhodko, V. Negrov, and A. Tkatchyov,
Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 16, 634 (2008).
107
F. Nanni, P. Travaglia, and M. Valentini, Compos. Sci. Technol. 69, 485
(2009).
108
Z. M. Shen, M. Ge, and D. L. Zhao, New Carbon Mater. 20, 289 (2005).
109
N. J. Tang, Y. Yang, K. J. Lin, W. Zhong, C. T. Au, and Y. W. Du,
J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 10061 (2008).
110
N. J. Tang, W. Zhong, C. T. Au, Y. Yang, M. G. Han, K. J. Lin, and Y.
W. Du, J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 19316 (2008).
111
D. L. Zhao and Z. M. Shen, Mater. Lett. 62, 3704 (2008).
112
H. Bi, K. C. Kou, K. Ostrikov, L. K. Yan, and Z. C. Wang, J. Alloy.
Compd. 478, 796 (2009).
113
X. Bai, Y. H. Zhai, and Y. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 11673 (2011).
114
J. J. Fang, S. F. Li, W. K. Zha, H. Y. Cong, J. F. Chen, and Z. Z. Chen,
J. Inorg. Mater. 26, 467 (2011).
115
H. B. Zhang, Q. Yan, W. G. Zheng, Z. X. He, and Z. Z. Yu, ACS Appl.
Mater. Interfaces 3, 918 (2011).
116
K. C. Pitman, M. W. Lindley, D. Simkin, and J. F. Cooper, IEE Proc. F,
Radar Signal Process. 138, 223 (1991).
117
X. F. Zhang, X. L. Dong, H. Huang, B. Lv, J. P. Lei, and C. J. Choi,
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40, 5383 (2007).
118
X. Yuan, H. Wang, B. Zha, G. Hou, and P. Hou, Surf. Coat. Technol.
201, 7130 (2007).
119
Y. Xiaojing, W. Hangong, H. Genliang, J. Li, and Y. Chunjiang, IEEE
Trans. Magn. 42, 2115 (2006).
120
K. Sung-Soo, H. Dae-Hee, and C. Sung-Baeg, IEEE Trans. Magn. 30,
4554 (1994).
121
S. Kolev, A. Yanev, and I. Nedkov, Physica Status Solidi (C), Applied
Research 3(5), 1308 (2006).
122
X.-G. Chen, Y. Ye, and J.-P. Cheng, J. Inorg. Mater. 26, 449 (2011).
123
C. Brosseau, Surf. Coating Tech. 206, 753 (2011).
124
W. Stewart, L. Callis, L. Barclay, M.-N. Barton, C. Blakemore, D. Cog-
gon, D. Cox, J. Fellows, M. Repacholi, M. Rugg, A. Swerdlow, and T. R.
K. V. Available, Mobile Phones and Health, Independent Expert Group
on Mobile Phones, National Radiological Protection Board, Oxon, U.K.,
2000).
125
T. W. Dawson, K. Caputa, M. A. Stuchly, R. B. Shepard, R. Kavet, and
A. Sastre, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 49, 254 (2002).
126
T. W. Dawson, M. A. Stuchly, K. Caputa, A. Sastre, R. B. Shepard, and
R. Kavet, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47, 1211 (2000).
127
R. E. Colin, Foundations of Microwave Engineering (McGraw Hill, New
York, 1966).
061301-21 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
128
J.-H. Oh, K.-S. Oh, C.-G. Kim, and C.-S. Hong, Composites, Part B 35,
49 (2004).
129
G. Z. Shen, Z. Xu, and Y. Li, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 301, 325 (2006).
130
S. J. Yan, L. Zhen, C. Y. Xu, J. T. Jiang, and W. Z. Shao, J. Phys. D:
Appl. Phys. 43, 245003 (2010).
131
R. Gerber, C. D. Wright, and G. A. (Eds.), Applied Magnetism (Kluwer
Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1992).
132
C. Kittel, Phys. Rev. 73, 155 (1948).
133
T. Maeda, S. Sugimoto, T. Kagotani, N. Tezuka, and K. Inomata, J.
Magn. Magn. Mater. 281, 195 (2004).
134
B. D. Cullity, Introduction to Magnetic Materials (Addison-Wesley,
Reading, MA, 1972).
135
O. Acher and S. Dubourg, Phys. Rev. B 77, 104440 (2008).
136
C. Brosseau, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39, 1277 (2006).
137
M. Sahimi, Heterogeneous Materials I: Linear Transport and Optical
Properties (Springer, New York, 2003).
138
G. W. Milton, The Theory of Composites (Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, England, 2002).
139
A. H. Sihvola, Electromagnetic Mixing Formulas and Applications (IEE
Publishing, London, 1999).
140
C. Brosseau and A. Beroual, Prog. Mater Sci. 48, 373 (2003).
141
S. Torquato, Random Heterogeneous Materials (Springer, New York,
2001).
142
M. Sahimi, Applications of Percolation Theory (Taylor and Francis, Bris-
tol, PA, 1994).
143
D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction to Percolation Theory (Taylor
and Francis, Bristol, PA, 1994).
144
A. Mejdoubi and C. Brosseau, Phys. Rev. E 73, 031405 (2006).
145
B. Sareni, L. Krahenbuhl, A. Beroual, and C. Brosseau, J. Appl. Phys. 80,
1688 (1996).
146
B. Sareni, L. Kranhenbuhl, A. Beroual, and C. Brosseau, J. Appl. Phys.
80, 4560 (1996).
147
B. Sareni, L. Krahenbuhl, A. Beroual, and C. Brosseau, J. Appl. Phys. 81,
2375 (1997).
148
A. Mejdoubi and C. Brosseau, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 024110 (2009).
149
V. Myroshnychenko and C. Brosseau, Phys Rev E 71, 016701 (2005).
150
V. Myroshnychenko and C. Brosseau, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 044101 (2005).
151
V. Myroshnychenko and C. Brosseau, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41, 095401
(2008).
152
S. E. Bouazzaoui, A. Droussi, M. E. Achour, and C. Brosseau, J. Appl.
Phys. 106, 104107 (2009).
153
D. Achlioptas, R. M. DSouza, and J. Spencer, Science 323, 1453
(2009).
154
A. L. Efros and B. I. Shklovskii, Phys Status Solidi B 76, 475 (1976).
155
J. P. Clerc, J. M. Laugier, G. Giraud, and J. M. Luck, Adv. Phys 39, 191
(1990).
156
H. Scher and R. Zallen, J. Chem. Phys. 53, 3759 (1970).
157
M. B. Heaney, Phys. Rev. B 52, 12477 (1995).
158
D. H. McQueen, K.-M. Jager, and M. Pel skova, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
37, 2160 (2004).
159
D. S. McLachlan, M. Blaszkiewicz, and R. E. Newnham, J. Am. Ceram.
Soc. 73, 2187 (1990).
160
J. Wu and D. S. McLachlan, Phys. Rev. B 58, 14880 (1998).
161
J. Wu and D. S. McLachlan, Phys. Rev. B 56, 1236 (1997).
162
D. S. McLachlan, W. D. Heiss, C. Chiteme, and J. Wu, Phys. Rev. B 58,
13558 (1998).
163
C. Chiteme and D. S. McLachlan, Phys. Rev. B 67, 024206 (2003).
164
P. Sheng, E. K. Sichel, and J. I. Gittleman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1197
(1978).
165
T. A. Ezquerra, M. Mohammadi, F. Kremer, T. Vilgis, and G. Wegner, J.
Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 21, 927 (1988).
166
F. Kremer, T. A. Ezquerra, M. Mohammadi, W. Bauhofer, T. A. Vilgis,
and G. Wegner, Solid State Commun. 66, 153 (1988).
167
K. L. Ngai and R. W. Rendell, Phys. Rev. B 61, 9393 (2000).
168
P. Sheng, in Macroscopic Properties of Disordered Media, Vol. 154
(Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 1982).
169
T. A. Ezquerra, F. Kremer, and G. Wegner, in Dielectric Properties of
Heterogeneous Materials, edited by A. Priou, Progress in Electromag-
netics Research (Elsevier, New York, 1992), Vol. 6.
170
A. Mejdoubi and C. Brosseau, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 063502 (2006).
171
J. P. Calame, A. Birman, Y. Carmel, D. Gershon, B. Levush, A. A. Soro-
kin, V. E. Semenov, D. Dadon, L. P. Martin, and M. Rosen, J. Appl.
Phys. 80, 3992 (1996).
172
J. P. Calame, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 084101 (2006).
173
J. P. Calame, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 5945 (2003).
174
L. P. Horwitz and H. Neumann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 765 (1967).
175
J. W. Evans, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 1281 (1993).
176
R. G. Parr and W. Yang, Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Mole-
cules (Oxford University Press and Clarendon Press, New York and
Oxford, 1989).
177
O. C. Zienkiewicz and R. L. Taylor, The Finite Element Method (Mc
Graw-Hill, New York, 1994).
178
J. Mackerle, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 7, 107 (1999).
179
G. Strang and G. J. Fix, An Analysis of The Finite Element Method (Pren-
tice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1973).
180
K. J. Bathe and E. L. Wilson, Numerical Methods in Finite Element Anal-
ysis (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1976).
181
J. Jin, The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics (Wiley, New
York, 1993).
182
P. P. Sylvester and R. L. Ferrari, Finite Elements for Electrical Engi-
neers, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1991).
183
C. Johnson, Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations by the
Finite Element Method (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Eng-
land, 1987).
184
V. Rokhlin, J. Comput. Phys. 60, 187 (1985).
185
J. M. Haile, C. Massobrio, and S. Torquato, J. Chem. Phys 83, 4075
(1985).
186
J. M. Haile, Molecular Dynamics Simulation: Elementary Methods
(Wiley, New York, 1992).
187
S. Stolzle, A. Enders, and G. Nimtz, J. Phys. (France) 2, 401 (1992).
188
T. Weiland, Part. Accel. 17, 227 (1985).
189
T. Weiland, Part Accel. 15, 245 (1984).
190
K. Binder and D. W. Heermann, Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical
Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988).
191
A. W. Appel, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 6, 85 (1985).
192
L. Greengard and V. Rokhlin, The Rapid Evaluation of Potential Fields
in Three Dimensions (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988).
193
N. I. Dib, M. Asi, and A. Sabbah, Prog. Electromagn. Res. C 13, 171
(2010).
194
I. A. Youngs, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys 35, 3127 (2002).
195
K. K. Karkkainen, A. H. Sihvola, and K. I. Nikoskinen, IEEE Trans. Geo-
sci. Remote Sens. 38, 1303 (2000).
196
K. L. Shlager and J. B. Schneider, IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 37, 39
(1995).
197
K. S. Kunz and R. J. Luebbers, The FDTD Method for Electromagnetics
(CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1993).
198
H. Ma, B. Zhang, W. Y. Tam, and P. Sheng, Phys. Rev. B 61, 962
(2000).
199
J. C. Michel, H. Moulinec, and P. Suquet, Comput. Mod. Eng. Sci. 1, 79
(2000).
200
S. Torquato, T. M. Truskett, and P. G. Debenedetti, Phys. Rev. Lett 84,
2064 (2000).
201
J. V. Milewski, Packing concepts in the use of ller and reinforcement
combinations, in Handbook of Fillers and Reinforcements for Plastics,
2nd ed., edited by H. S. Kata and J. V. Milewski (Van Nostrand Reinhold,
New York, 1987).
202
R. M. German, Particle Packing Characteristics (Metal Powder Indus-
tries Federation, Princeton, NJ, 1989).
203
A. Serkov and M. Radishevskii, Fibre Chem. 40, 24 (2008).
204
A. Jacob, Reinf. Plast. 51, 38 (2007).
205
D. D. L. Chung, Carbon 39, 279 (2001).
206
H. Zhu, P. Chen, R. Wu, and H. Zhang, Indian J. Fibre Text. Res. 32, 391
(2007).
207
C. M. A. Lopes, G. G. Peixoto, and M. C. Rezende, Microwave Absorp-
tion Effectiveness of Nonwoven Support Impregnated with Carbon Black
(IEEE, New York, 2003).
208
J. Wu and D. D. L. Chung, Carbon 40, 445 (2002).
209
T. Zou, N. Zhao, C. Shi, and J. Li, Bull. Mater. Sci., 1 (2011).
210
M. A. Nahil and P. T. Williams, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 91, 67.
211
J. Zeng and J. Xu, J. Alloys Compd. 493, L39 (2010).
212
N. Zhao, T. Zou, C. Shi, J. Li, and W. Guo, Mater. Sci. Eng., B 127, 207
(2006).
213
H. L. Fan, W. Yang, and Z. M. Chao, Compos. Sci. Technol. 67, 3472
(2007).
214
S.-H. Kim, Y.-G. Park, and S.-S. Kim, Phys. Status Solidi C 4, 4602
(2007).
215
J. Klett, R. Hardy, E. Romine, C. Walls, and T. Burchell, Carbon 38, 953
(2000).
061301-22 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
216
G. Min, S. Zengmin, C. Weidong, and L. Hui, Carbon 45, 141 (2007).
217
Q. C. Ling, J. Z. Sun, Q. Zhao, and Q. Y. Zhou, Mater. Sci. Eng., B 162,
162 (2009).
218
G. Z. Shen, M. Xu, and Z. Xu, Mater. Chem. Phys. 105, 268 (2007).
219
C. P. Neo and V. K. Varadan, Smart Mater. Struct. 10, 1107 (2001).
220
X. Z. Shen, S. M. Xie, J. Guo, and Z. C. Liu, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 114,
3434 (2009).
221
G. Z. Shen, C. Yu, and L. J. Wu, Microwave Absorption Properties of
Cement Composites Containing Carbon Fibers and Ferrites (World Aca-
demic Union-World Academic, Liverpool, England 2010).
222
C. Mitrano, A. Balzano, M. Bertacca, M. Flaccavento, R. Mancinelli, and
IEEE, in 2008 IEEE Radar Conference, Vol. 14 (IEEE, New York,
2008), pp. 701706.
223
X. Xu, A. Qing, Y. B. Gan, and Y. P. Feng, Microwave Opt. Technol.
Lett. 49, 185 (2007).
224
X. Zhang and W. Sun, in Multi-Functional Materials and Structures II,
Pts 1 and 2; Vol. 7982, edited by Y. S. Yin and X. Wang (Trans Tech
Publications, Stafa-Zurich, Switzerland, 2009), pp. 18431846.
225
M. Y. Koledintseva, G. Antonini, J. Zhang, A. Orlandi, K. N. Rozanov,
and J. L. Drewniak, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium
on Electromagnetic Compatibility, Boston, MA, Aug. 1822, 2003
(IEEE, New York, 2003), Vol. 2, pp. 898903.
226
M. Y. Koledintseva, J. L. Drewniak, R. E. DuBroff, K. N. Rozanov, and
B. Archambeault, Prog. Electromagn. Res. B 15, 197 (2009).
227
P. M. Ajayan and T. W. Ebbesen, Rep. Prog. Phys. 60, 1025 (1997).
228
Y. Zhou, A. Gaur, S.-H. Hur, C. Kocabas, M. A. Meitl, M. Shim, and J.
A. Rogers, Nano Lett. 4, 2031 (2004).
229
T. Takenobu, T. Takano, M. Shiraishi, Y. Murakami, M. Ata, H. Kataura,
Y. Achiba, and Y. Iwasa, Nature Mater. 2, 683 (2003).
230
X. C. Gui, K. L. Wang, J. Q. Wei, R. T. Lu, Q. K. Shu, Y. Jia, C. Wang,
H. W. Zhu, and D. H. Wu, Sci. China Ser. E: Technol. Sci. 52, 227
(2009).
231
E. Vazquez and M. Prato, ACS Nano 3, 3819 (2009).
232
M. Reghu, C. O. Yoon, C. Y. Yang, D. Moses, P. Smith, A. J. Heeger,
and Y. Cao, Phys. Rev. B 50, 13931 (1994).
233
Z. J. Fan, G. H. Luo, Z. F. Zhang, L. Zhou, and F. Wei, Mater. Sci. Eng.
B 132, 85 (2006).
234
J. Z. Kovacs, B. S. Velagala, K. Schulte, and W. Bauhofer, Compos. Sci.
Technol. 67, 922 (2007).
235
R. H. Schmidt, I. A. Kinloch, A. N. Burgess, and A. H. Windle, Langmuir
23, 5707 (2007).
236
A. Saib, L. Bednarz, R. Daussin, C. Bailly, L. Xudong, J. M. Thomassin,
C. Pagnoulle, C. Detrembleur, R. Jerome, and I. Huynen, IEEE Trans.
Microwave Theory Tech. 54, 2745 (2006).
237
F. H. Gojny, M. H. G. Wichmann, B. Fiedler, and K. Schulte, Compos.
Sci. Technol. 65, 2300 (2005).
238
F. H. Gojny, M. H. G. Wichmann, U. Kopke, B. Fiedler, and K. Schulte,
Compos. Sci. Technol. 64, 2363 (2004).
239
Y. Zhou, F. Pervin, L. Lewis, and S. Jeelani, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A
452453, 657 (2007).
240
B. Kim, J. Lee, and I. Yu, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 6724 (2003).
241
P. Saini, V. Choudhary, B. P. Singh, R. B. Mathur, and S. K. Dhawan,
Mater. Chem. Phys. 113, 919 (2009).
242
J. Wu and L. Kong, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 4956 (2004).
243
L. Liu, S. Matitsine, Y. B. Gan, L. F. Chen, L. B. Kong, and K. N. Roza-
nov, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 094106 (2007).
244
I. Balberg, N. Binenbaum, and N. Wagner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1465
(1984).
245
I. Balberg, C. H. Anderson, S. Alexander, and N. Wagner, Phys. Rev. B
30, 3933 (1984).
246
I. Balberg, N. Binenbaum, and C. H. Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1605
(1983).
247
A. N. Lagarkov and A. K. Sarychev, Phys. Rev. B 53, 6318 (1996).
248
A. N. Lagarkov, S. M. Matytsin, K. N. Rozanov, and A. K. Sarychev, J.
Appl. Phys. 84, 3806 (1998).
249
A. Celzard, E. McRae, C. Deleuze, M. Dufort, G. Furdin, Mar, ecirc, ch,
eacute, and, J. F. Phys. Rev. B 53, 6209 (1996).
250
C. A. Martin, J. K. W. Sandler, M. S. P. Shaffer, M.-K. Schwarz, W.
Bauhofer, K. Schulte, and A. H. Windle, Compos. Sci. Technol. 64, 2309
(2004).
251
J. K. W. Sandler, J. E. Kirk, I. A. Kinloch, M. S. P. Shaffer, and A. H.
Windle, Polymer 44, 5893 (2003).
252
M. B. Bryning, M. F. Islam, J. M. Kikkawa, and A. G. Yodh, Adv. Mater.
17, 1186 (2005).
253
L. Flandin, J. Y. Cavaille, G. Bidan, and Y. Brechet, Polym. Compos. 21,
165 (2000).
254
B. J. P. Adohi, A. Mdarhri, C. Prunier, B. Haidar, and C. Brosseau,
J. Appl. Phys. 108, 074108.
255
W. Bauhofer and J. Z. Kovacs, Compos. Sci. Technol. 69, 1486 (2009).
256
S. Z. Shen, S. Bateman, C. Huynh, M. DellOlio, S. Hawkins, W. Yang,
Q. Y. Yang, and K. F. Cai, Advanced Materials Research 66, 198 (2009).
257
Z. F. Zhang, G. H. Luo, Z. J. Fan, R. Xiang, L. Zhou, and F. Wei, Acta
Phys. Chim. Sin. 22, 296 (2006).
258
S. Bose, R. A. Khare, and P. Moldenaers, Polymer 51, 975.
259
D. L. Zhao, J. M. Zhang, X. Li, and Z. M. Shen, J. Alloys Compd. 505,
712 (2010).
260
H. Y. Lin, H. Zhu, H. F. Guo, and L. F. Yu, Mater. Res. Bull. 43, 2697
(2008).
261
D. L. Zhao, X. Li, and Z. M. Shen, J. Alloys Compd. 471, 457 (2009).
262
R. T. Lv, F. Y. Kang, J. L. Gu, X. C. Gui, J. Q. Wei, K. L. Wang, and
D. H. Wu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 3 (2008).
263
L. Zhang and H. Zhu, Mater. Lett. 63, 272 (2009).
264
L. Zhang, H. Zhu, Y. Song, Y. M. Zhang, and Y. Huang, Mater. Sci. Eng.
B 153, 78 (2008).
265
D. L. Zhao, X. Li, and Z. M. Shen, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 150, 105 (2008).
266
T. C. Zou, H. P. Li, N. G. Zhao, and C. S. Shi, J. Alloy. Compd. 496, L22
(2010).
267
H. B. Yi, F. S. Wen, L. Qiao, and F. S. Li, J. Appl. Phys. 106, 4 (2009).
268
P. Xu, X. J. Han, X. R. Liu, B. Zhang, C. Wang, and X. H. Wang, Mater.
Chem. Phys. 114, 556 (2009).
269
X. Feng, G. Liao, J. Du, L. Dong, K. Jin, and X. Jian, Polym. Eng. Sci.
48, 1007 (2008).
270
D. L. Zhao, X. Li, and Z. M. Shen, Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 2902 (2008).
271
X. Shen, R. Z. Gong, Y. Nie, and J. H. Nie, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 288,
397 (2005).
272
C. Bi, M. F. Zhu, Q. H. Zhang, Y. G. Li, and H. Z. Wang, J. Inorg. Mater.
25, 829 (2010).
273
H. M. Kim, K. Kim, C. Y. Lee, J. Joo, S. J. CHo, H. S. Yoon, D. A. Peja-
kovic, J. W. Yoo, and A. J. Epstein, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 589 (2004).
274
H. Lin, H. Zhu, H. Guo, and L. Yu, Mater. Lett. 61, 3547 (2007).
275
S. Liu, J. Zhu, Y. Mastai, I. Felner, and A. Gedanken, Chem. Mater. 12,
2205 (2000).
276
M. Han, W. Zhang, C. Gao, Y. Liang, Z. Xu, J. Zhu, and J. He, Carbon
44, 211 (2006).
277
K. Lafdi, A. Chin, N. Ali, and J. F. Despres, J. Appl. Phys. 79, 6007 (1996).
278
F. Naab, M. Dhoubhadel, O. W. Holland, J. L. Duggan, J. Roberts, and
F. D. McDaniel, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on
Particle Induced X-ray Emission and Its Analytical Applications
(Portoroz, Slovenia, 2004), p. 601.1.
279
S. Pal, S. Chandra, M.-H. Phan, P. Mukherjee, and H. Srikanth, Nano-
technology 20, 485604 (2009).
280
S. Moseenkov, V. Kuznetsov, A. Usoltseva, I. Mazov, A. Ischenko, T.
Buryakov, O. Anikeeva, A. Romanenko, P. Kuzhir, D. Bychenok, K.
Batrakov, and S. Maksimenko, in Proceedings of the 1st Wseas Interna-
tional Conference on Recent Advances in Nanotechnology, edited by L.
Trilling, D. Perkins, D. Dionysios, L. Perlovsky, K. Davey, D. Landgrebe,
M. A. Marino, S. H. Collicott, M. Ceccarelli, and J. W. Lund (World Sci-
entic and Engineering Academy and Society, Athens, 2009), pp. 9295.
281
Y. Zhan, R. Zhao, Y. Lei, F. Meng, J. Zhong, and X. Liu, J. Magn. Magn.
Mater. 323, 1006 (2011).
282
A. Moradi, Appl. Optics 49, 1728 (2010).
283
A. Kawabata and R. Kubo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 21, 1765 (1966).
284
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media,
Course of Theoretical PhysicsPergamon International Library of Sci-
ence, Technology, Engineering and Social Studies (Pergamon, Oxford,
England, 1975), 4th rev. English ed.
285
W. Chen, M. Han, and L. Deng, Physica B 405, 1484 (2010).
286
W. Chen, M. Han, and L.-J. Deng, PIERS Online 6, 1 (2010).
287
X. Chi, H. Yi, W. Zuo, L. Qiao, T. Wang, and F. Li, J. Phys. D: Appl.
Phys. 44, 295001 (2011).
288
K. N. Rozanov, Z. W. Li, L. F. Chen, and M. Y. Koledintseva, J. Appl.
Phys. 97, 013905 (2005).
289
H. Shahid, I. J. Youngs, and I. J. Ford, J. Phys. D-Appl. Phys. 40, 5331
(2007).
290
H. Li, J. Wang, Y. Huang, X. Yan, J. Qi, J. Liu, and Y. Zhang, Materials
Science and Engineering: B 175, 81-85.
291
C. Ingrosso, A.-M. Panniello, R. Comparelli, and M. L. Striccoli, Mater.
Des. 3, 1316 (2010).
061301-23 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
292
M. X. Chen, Y. Zhu, Y. B. Pan, H. M. Kou, H. Xu, and J. K. Guo, Mater.
Des. 32, 3013.
293
J. B. Donnet and A. Voet, Carbon Black Physics, Chemistry and Elasto-
mer Reinforcement (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1976).
294
K. H. Wu, T. H. Ting, G. P. Wang, W. D. Ho, and C. C. Shih, Polym.
Degrad. Stab. 93, 483 (2008).
295
S. K. Kwon, J. M. Ahn, G. H. Kim, C. H. Chun, J. S. Hwang, and J. H.
Lee, Polym. Eng. Sci. 42, 2165 (2002).
296
R. G. Geyer, J. B. Jarvis, M. D. Janezic, and R. Kaiser, Natl. Inst. Stand.
Tech. Note 1529 (2003).
297
N. Ce-Wen, Prog. Mater. Sci. 37, 1 (1993).
298
Q. Ling, J. Sun, Q. Zhao, and Q. Zhou, Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 50,
89 (2011).
299
X. X. Liu, Z. Y. Zhang, and Y. P. Wu, ComposItes, Part B 42, 326 (2011).
300
G. Q. Wang, X. D. Chen, Y. P. Duan, and S. H. Liu, J. Alloys Compd.
454, 340 (2008).
301
L. D. Liu, Y. P. Duan, L. Y. Chen, and S. H. Liu, Study on the Microwave
Absorption Properties of Carbonyl-Iron Powder/Carbon Black Compos-
ite Coating (Sci. Res. Publ. Inc. USA, Paseo Segovia, Irvin, CA, 2010).
302
L. D. Liu, Y. P. Duan, L. X. Ma, S. H. Liu, and Z. Yu, Appl. Surf. Sci.
257, 842 (2010).
303
M. S. Pinho, R. D. Lima, M. R. da Silva, and R. C. R. Nunes, Mater.
Technol. 21, 27 (2006).
304
M. A. Soloman, P. Kurian, M. R. Anantharaman, and P. A. Joy, J. Appl.
Polym. Sci. 89, 769 (2003).
305
B. Wen, J. J. Zhao, Y. P. Duan, X. G. Zhang, Y. B. Zhao, C. Dong, S. H.
Liu, and T. J. Li, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39, 1960 (2006).
306
K. Ishizaki and K. Nagata, ISIJ Int. 47, 811 (2007).
307
C. Brosseau, W. Ndong, and A. Mdarhri, J. Appl. Phys. 104, 7 (2008).
308
K.-Y. Park, S.-E. Lee, C.-G. Kim, and J.-H. Han, Compos. Sci. Technol.
66, 576 (2006).
309
Y. P. Duan, Y. Yang, M. He, S. H. Liu, X. D. Cui, and H. F. Chen,
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41, 6 (2008).
310
M. Wang, Y. P. Duan, S. H. Liu, X. G. Li, and Z. J. Ji, J. Magn. Magn.
Mater. 321, 3442 (2009).
311
L. Y. Chen, Y. P. Duan, L. D. Liu, J. B. Guo, and S. H. Liu, Mater. Des.
32, 570 (2010).
312
D. D. L. Chung, Nanostructured Carbon for Advanced Applications, Vol.
24 (Kluwer Academic, London, 2001).
313
M. V. Shuba, G. Y. Slepyan, S. A. Maksimenko, C. Thomsen, and A.
Lakhtakia, Phys. Rev. B 79, 155403 (2009).
314
S. Maksimenko, P. Kuzhir, G. Slepyan, V. Kuznetsov, O. Shenderova, A.
Okotrub, L. G. Bulusheva, J. Macutkevic, and P. Lambin, in Carbon
Onions for Electromagnetic Applications, in Proceedings of the Electro-
magnetic Theory (EMTS), edited by Gerhard Kristensson (URSI Interna-
tional Symposium, Berlin, 2010), pp. 756759.
315
S. Motojima, Y. Itoh, S. Asakura, and H. Iwanaga, J. Mater. Sci. 30, 5049
(1995).
316
J.-H. Du, C. Sun, S. Bai, G. Su, Z. Ying, and H.-M. Cheng, J. Mater.
Res., 1232 (2002).
317
V. L. Kuznetsov, A. L. Chuvilin, Y. V. Butenko, I. Y. Malkov, and
V. M. Titov, Chem. Phys. Lett. 222, 343 (1994).
318
P. Kuzhir, S. Maksimenko, D. Bychanok, V. Kuznetsov, S. Moseenkov,
I. Mazov, O. Shenderova, and P. Lambin, Metamaterials 3, 148 (2009).
319
S. A. Maksimenko, V. N. Rodionova, G. Y. Slepyan, V. A. Karpovich,
O. Shenderova, J. Walsh, V. L. Kuznetsov, I. N. Mazov, S. I. Moseenkov,
A. V. Okotrub, and P. Lambin, Diamond Relat. Mater. 16, 1231 (2007).
320
R. Langlet, P. Lambin, A. Mayer, P. Kuzhir, and S. Maksimenko, Nano-
technology 19, 115706 (2008).
321
X. Lv, S. Yang, J. Jin, L. Zhang, G. Li, and J. Jiang, J. Macromol. Sci.
Part B Phys. 49, 355 (2011).
322
J.-B. Kim, S.-K. Lee, and C.-G. Kim, Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 2909
(2008).
323
K.-Y. Park, J.-H. Han, S.-B. Lee, J.-B. Kim, J.-W. Yi, and S.-K. Lee,
Compos. Sci. Technol. 69, 1271 (2009).
324
Y. Fan, H. Yang, M. Li, and G. Zou, Mater. Chem. Phys. 115, 696 (2009).
325
J. P. Gogoi, N. S. Bhattacharyya, and K. C. James Raju, Composites, Part
B 42, 1291.
326
J. R. Potts, D. R. Dreyer, C. W. Bielawski, and R. S. Ruoff, Polymer 52, 5.
327
S. Stankovich, D. A. Dikin, G. H. B. Dommett, K. M. Kohlhaas, E. J.
Zimney, E. A. Stach, R. D. Piner, S. T. Nguyen, and R. S. Ruoff, Nature
442, 282 (2006).
328
D. Li and R. B. Kaner, Science 320, 1170 (2008).
329
X. Huang, Z. Yin, S. Wu, X. Qi, Q. He, Q. Zhang, Q. Yan, F. Boey, and
H. Zhang, Small 7, 1876 (2011).
330
V. Singh, D. Joung, L. Zhai, S. Das, S. I. Khondaker, and S. Seal, Prog.
Mater. Sci. 56, 1178 (2011).
331
K. MacKenzie, O. Dunens, and A. T. Harris, Sep. Purif. Technol. 66, 209
(2009).
332
H. Mi, X. Zhang, S. An, X. Ye, and S. Yang, Electrochem. Commun. 9,
2859 (2007).
333
D. Schurig, J. J. Mock, B. J. Justice, S. A. Cummer, J. B. Pendry, A. F.
Starr, and D. R. Smith, Science 314, 977 (2006).
334
C. Brosseau, Computational Electromagnetics: From the Design of
Heterostructures to the Modeling of Biostructures, in press.
335
M. Burghard, H. Klauk, and K. Kern, Adv. Mater. 21, 2586 (2009).
336
The isolated C atom has a 1s
2
2s
2
2p
2
conguration with lled 1s and 2s states
and two electrons in the 2p state. Nanotubes, fullerenes, and graphene are
forms of sp
2
C. Through sp
2
hybridization of the atomic orbitals, two neigh-
boring atoms can bond strongly via both s- and p-states. As a result of the
high p-bonding energy, graphite is energetically slightly more stable than
sp
3
-bonded diamond-like structures under ambient temperature and pressure.
The ability of C to form a wide variety of anisotropic and stable 2D struc-
tures is in contrast to clusters of nearly all other elements, which are essen-
tially always 3D. Graphene, consisting of single layers of sp
2
C, is presently
the most exciting form of C, ever since it was made by the mechanical exfo-
liation of graphite. Its unique band structure of mass-less fermions due to the
Dirac cone structure, and the possibility of huge carrier mobilities with inhib-
ited carrier scattering, has led to intense fundamental research activity with
the hope that practical applications in elds ranging from electronics to
energy science will emerge (Ref. 1). The gap-less band structure requires the
two C atoms in the planar unit cell to be symmetry equivalent, unlike in the
Bernal graphite structure. With advances in synthetic tools, a variety of elu-
sive C allotropes such as 1D sp-carbyne, 2D sp-sp
2
-graphyne, and 3D sp-
sp
3
-yne diamond, were also obtained or predicted (for review see, e.g., Refs.
2 and 3). It should also be noted that recently, an allotrope of C has been
obtained by compressing graphite with pressure over 17 GPa, whose
hardness is even higher than diamond, while its structure is unknown so far
(Ref. 4).
337
There are three main approaches for introducing particle llers into a
polymer matrix. The rst one is the mechanical mixing of the molten
polymer phase with the particles. A second one is based on the in situ for-
mation of the particles in the presence of the already formed polymer ma-
trix. The third strategy consists in dispersing the particles in a monomer
solution (precursor of the host matrix), which is then polymerized
(Ref. 20). The effective utilization of particles in composite applications
depends strongly on the ability to disperse the particles homogeneously
throughout the matrix without destroying the integrity of the particles.
Rational design of any device requires a fundamental understanding of
the physical properties of these materials, and how they depend on the
way in which ller particles and polymer chains are connected, ller-
ller interactions, and the state of dispersion of ller particles. Modern
technologies aim to tailor such properties for specic applications in the
aforementioned industries enabling composites to be cost-effectively
manufactured by injection molding or extrusion techniques. On the other
hand, these materials have also proved to be model systems to examine
the underlying molecular level underpinnings of the mesostructure and
macroscopic properties of conned polymer systems. Essential to under-
standing these issues is a clear delineation of the intrinsic vs extrinsic
properties of the ller particles. However, studies of interactions between
polymer chains and ller particles are inuenced by complex factors
including particle size, surface area, aggregate structure and surface activ-
ity that have precluded the development of a rst-principles understand-
ing of particle-lled composite materials. For example, Obrzut and
co-workers (Ref. 21) have shown that the blending of CNTs into
polymer matrices leads to composite materials whose properties can
depend strongly on the ow history to which the materials have been
subjected.
061301-24 F. Qin and C. Brosseau J. Appl. Phys. 111, 061301 (2012)
Downloaded 27 Sep 2012 to 150.162.10.235. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions

You might also like