Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • The Safety of Our Children Is Paramount

    Uploaded by

    Tommy Peters
    29 views4 pages
    In seeking clarification from a young Hindraf (Hindu Rights Action Force) member, I asked him if the issues were mainly about compensation and constitutional rights, as widely reported. He said by and large, the destruction of Hindu temples is the core issue, everything else is complementary. He added that when temple demolitions are seen as desecration, the issue takes on another dimension. According to him, in 2006 alone, about 70 temples were brought down. It comes to an average of five to six temples a month. He said that Hindraf members are aware of the statistics and are ready to remobilize on short notice. I reminded him of 1969 when people ran ‘amok’ and racial strife ensued. I told him the government of the day misread the tealeaves and allowed people their constitutional right to assemble. When violence erupted and Malaysians at large faced the specter of the ‘amok’ it was too late. In essence, the constitutional rights of a few jeopardized the freedom and safety of many. I pointed out that there was no religious factor in the equation then and that subsequent governments faced the delicate balancing act of pleasing a myriad of cultures and religions, managing to keep the peace so far, which is an amazing feat by any standards and with the Article 11 road shows, the government had to micro-manage the religious factor to avoid the specter and although constitutional rights were compromised in the process, the safety of the masses in general were ensured. I pointed out that a Malay minister said, "It is not for no reason that the word ‘amok’ comes from the Malay community” and that although the minister's self-critique was misplaced I am certain he was managing the balance even when he bandied the Internal Security Act then, as he is doing now. I told the Hindraf member that history has shown that religions have an impetus to actions, sometimes detrimental ones. I told him that destruction of temples, churches and even mosques, pales in comparison when the safety and wellbeing of our children are at stake. Therefore, defending religion in the public domain should not even be considered if the response is likely to result in anarchy. I told him to look at “religious and cultural oppression” in other parts of the world and he will realize that the safety and wellbeing of our children is paramount, everything else is complementary. Words – Tommy Peters

    Original Title

    The Safety of Our Children is Paramount

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    In seeking clarification from a young Hindraf (Hindu Rights Action Force) member, I asked him if the issues were mainly about compensation and constitutional rights, as widely reported. He said by and large, the destruction of Hindu temples is the core issue, everything else is complementary. He added that when temple demolitions are seen as desecration, the issue takes on another dimension. According to him, in 2006 alone, about 70 temples were brought down. It comes to an average of five to six temples a month. He said that Hindraf members are aware of the statistics and are ready to remobilize on short notice. I reminded him of 1969 when people ran ‘amok’ and racial strife ensued. I told him the government of the day misread the tealeaves and allowed people their constitutional right to assemble. When violence erupted and Malaysians at large faced the specter of the ‘amok’ it was too late. In essence, the constitutional rights of a few jeopardized the freedom and safety of many. I pointed out that there was no religious factor in the equation then and that subsequent governments faced the delicate balancing act of pleasing a myriad of cultures and religions, managing to keep the peace so far, which is an amazing feat by any standards and with the Article 11 road shows, the government had to micro-manage the religious factor to avoid the specter and although constitutional rights were compromised in the process, the safety of the masses in general were ensured. I pointed out that a Malay minister said, "It is not for no reason that the word ‘amok’ comes from the Malay community” and that although the minister's self-critique was misplaced I am certain he was managing the balance even when he bandied the Internal Security Act then, as he is doing now. I told the Hindraf member that history has shown that religions have an impetus to actions, sometimes detrimental ones. I told him that destruction of temples, churches and even mosques, pales in comparison when the safety and wellbeing of our children are at stake. Therefore, defending religion in the public domain should not even be considered if the response is likely to result in anarchy. I told him to look at “religious and cultural oppression” in other parts of the world and he will realize that the safety and wellbeing of our children is paramount, everything else is complementary. Words – Tommy Peters

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    29 views4 pages

    The Safety of Our Children Is Paramount

    Uploaded by

    Tommy Peters
    In seeking clarification from a young Hindraf (Hindu Rights Action Force) member, I asked him if the issues were mainly about compensation and constitutional rights, as widely reported. He said by and large, the destruction of Hindu temples is the core issue, everything else is complementary. He added that when temple demolitions are seen as desecration, the issue takes on another dimension. According to him, in 2006 alone, about 70 temples were brought down. It comes to an average of five to six temples a month. He said that Hindraf members are aware of the statistics and are ready to remobilize on short notice. I reminded him of 1969 when people ran ‘amok’ and racial strife ensued. I told him the government of the day misread the tealeaves and allowed people their constitutional right to assemble. When violence erupted and Malaysians at large faced the specter of the ‘amok’ it was too late. In essence, the constitutional rights of a few jeopardized the freedom and safety of many. I pointed out that there was no religious factor in the equation then and that subsequent governments faced the delicate balancing act of pleasing a myriad of cultures and religions, managing to keep the peace so far, which is an amazing feat by any standards and with the Article 11 road shows, the government had to micro-manage the religious factor to avoid the specter and although constitutional rights were compromised in the process, the safety of the masses in general were ensured. I pointed out that a Malay minister said, "It is not for no reason that the word ‘amok’ comes from the Malay community” and that although the minister's self-critique was misplaced I am certain he was managing the balance even when he bandied the Internal Security Act then, as he is doing now. I told the Hindraf member that history has shown that religions have an impetus to actions, sometimes detrimental ones. I told him that destruction of temples, churches and even mosques, pales in comparison when the safety and wellbeing of our children are at stake. Therefore, defending religion in the public domain should not even be considered if the response is likely to result in anarchy. I told him to look at “religious and cultural oppression” in other parts of the world and he will realize that the safety and wellbeing of our children is paramount, everything else is complementary. Words – Tommy Peters

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 4

    The safety of our children is paramount

    " # ENGLISH | B.MALAYSIA | | " #

    SUBSCRIBE NOW | RENEW | E-COUPON | ADVERTISE | ABOUT US | JOIN

    Welcome TOMMY PETERS

    Expiry date: 2 -Jul -2008

    Renew/Upgrade

    LETTERS

    CLA Adjust font size:


    + -

    Najib, you really can't be bothered, can you? NS good but needs more commonsense The 'social contract' and May 13 May 13 'a blessing': Mukhriz sick The leaving of the suppressed Whither self-identity of the Malays ? NCR - Masing owes Dayaks one big explanation English right choice for science and maths No place for NRD to make moral judgments Umno gov't nothing more than pet-killers
    NEWS

    The safety of our children is paramount


    Tommy Peters | Nov 29, 07 5:33pm

    EVENTS

    Syarahan Umum
    CLASSIFIEDS

    Seeking clarification from a young Hindraf member, I asked him if the issues were mainly about compensation and constitutional rights, as widely reported. He said by and large, the destruction of Hindu temples is the core issue, everything else is complementary. He added that when such temple demolition is being seen as desecration, the issue takes on another dimension. According to him, in 2006 alone, about 70 temples were brought down. It comes to an average of five to six temples a month. He said that Hindraf members are aware of the statistics and are ready to remobilise on short notice. I reminded him of 1969 when people ran amok and racial strife ensued. I told him the government at that time misread this and allowed people their constitutional right to assemble. When violence erupted and Malaysians at large faced the specter of the amok, it was too late. In essence, the constitutional rights of a few jeopardised the freedom and safety of many. There was no religious factor in the equation then. Subsequent governments faced the delicate balancing act of pleasing a myriad of cultures and religions, managing to keep the peace so far, which is an amazing feat by any standards. With the Article 11 road shows recently, the government micro-managed this to avoid the specter. Although constitutional rights were compromised in the process, the safety of the masses were ensured. I remember one Malay minister who said, "It is not for no reason that the word amok comes from the Malay community." I thought the minister's self-critique was misplaced but I am certain he was managing the balance even when he bandied the Internal Security Act then, as he is doing now. I told the Hindraf member that history has shown religions to be impetus to actions, sometimes detrimental ones. I told him destruction of temples, churches and even mosques, pales in comparison when the safety and well-being of our children are at stake. Therefore defending religion in the public domain should not even be considered if the response is likely to result in anarchy. I told him to look at religious and cultural oppression in other parts of the world and he will realise that the safety and well-being of our children is paramount, everything else is complementary.

    Special Home Loan / Selling books..... Speak English NOW

    Bengkel Latihtubi Per

    A gift for yourself & y

    Submit your classifieds h

    ADVE

    Commission: Act against Dr M, five others The royal commission's key findings Litigants should now 'seek review of Lingam cases' Hindraf chief's passport 'revoked' Gov't slammed for passport cancellation Passport cancellation: 'Gov't owes an explanation' Half-a-mil gone in 44 days, residents turn to ACA Cop admits Tian could not have breached police cordon Ex -commando trainer defends 'robust' methods Uthayakumar given medical treatment 10 times
    COLUMNS

    After Nargis, security dilemma Harassing Haris and snuffing candles Alas, the mainstream media sloth awake Keep hunting 'dem rats Cyclones Nargis and Najib The power paradigm Sedition Act or Sedation Act? Umno must go! DAP, a mirror version of MCA + MIC? Is saying 'swine' seditious?
    OPINIONS

    Guidelines for Letters

    Food riots coming to the US Hybrid rice not the answer for M'sia Time for the daring questions Sultan Azlan Shah,

    RELATED STORIES

    Diy D

    http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/75472

    The Safety Of Our Children Is Paramount


    everything else is complementary Published November 2007 Malaysiakini

    In seeking clarification from a young Hindraf (Hindu Rights Action Force) member, I asked him if the issues were mainly about compensation and constitutional rights, as widely reported. He said by and large, the destruction of Hindu temples is the core issue, everything else is complementary. He added that when temple demolitions are seen as desecration, the issue takes on another dimension. According to him, in 2006 alone, about 70 temples were brought down. It comes to an average of five to six temples a month. He said that Hindraf members are aware of the statistics and are ready to remobilize on short notice. I reminded him of 1969 when people ran amok and racial strife ensued. I told him the government of the day misread the tealeaves and allowed people their constitutional right to assemble. When violence erupted and Malaysians at large faced the specter of the amok it was too late. In essence, the constitutional rights of a few jeopardized the freedom and safety of many.
    continued

    I pointed out that there was no religious factor in the equation then and that subsequent governments faced the delicate balancing act of pleasing a myriad of cultures and religions, managing to keep the peace so far, which is an amazing feat by any standards and with the Article 11 road shows, the government had to micro-manage the religious factor to avoid the specter and although constitutional rights were compromised in the process, the safety of the masses in general were ensured. I pointed out that a Malay minister said, "It is not for no reason that the word amok comes from the Malay community and that although the minister's self- critique was misplaced I am certain he was managing the balance even when he bandied the Internal Security Act then, as he is doing now. I told the Hindraf member that history has shown that religions have an impetus to actions, sometimes detrimental ones. I told him that destruction of temples, churches and even mosques, pales in comparison when the safety and wellbeing of our children are at stake. Therefore, defending religion in the public domain should not even be considered if the response is likely to result in anarchy. I told him to look at religious and cultural oppression in other parts of the world and he will realize that the safety and wellbeing of our children is paramount, everything else is complementary. Words Tommy Peters

    You might also like