Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shashikant Jesrani & Ors. Vs. Assistant Registrar & Ors. Mr.Satyajeet Mirajkar i/b.Gabriel Pillai for the Petitioners. Mr.S.N.Patil, A.G.P.for the Respondents. CORAM :- V.C.DAGA,J. DATE : 27TH JANUARY,2009 P.C. ..Petitioners ..Respondents
1. Petition January, is
Heard learned Counsel for Petitioner. This directed 2009 passed against by the the order dated Divisional 13th Joint
2. of hearing, is as under:
3.
the Society entered into the office for a term of five years.
4. Cooperative Managing
As per Section 73(1)(AB) of the Maharashtra Societies Committee were Act,1960, bound the to members execute bond of by the 23rd
August, 2005 (i.e. within 15 days from the date of assuming office).
The members of the Managing Committee failed bonds. Consequently, Committee August, 2005. by operation vacated there was of law, their no
Managing 24th
automatically Thereafter,
6. who August, the further Cooperative resolution Advocate Election, the are
It appears that out of 7 members, 6 members constituted 2005 Society appears till that Managing continued 2008 sensing these 10th as appears of to October, be the an to 2008. validly September, Election have 6 2008 Officer conducted The elected present members Committee to look though action members and to Election in after the the month affairs of of It the adopted appointed conduct in Petitioners of the
unauthorisedly. from
7. Department Petitioners election Managing want Registrar read Societies Challenge also to been in with
The fault was found by the Cooperative with with held regard regard in the to to month could not the the of have contention validity October,2008, held of of since the the old for Assistant 73(1)(AB) Cooperative Administrator. said the order Divisional has Joint
Maharashtra an The by
Registrar, which is impugned in this Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
8.
:3: it were vacated the bond Cooperative no the the legal lapse under is clear elected their that the on office members 8th on by August, 24th them 78(1)(AB) Act,1960. Committee dated 10th in of the 2005, August, leading of Thereafter, the office. 2008 adopted illegally Managing had 2005, failure the there in to Committee automatically view of execute Maharashtra was Therefore, by holding
Managing
Committee,
office could not have adopted resolution to hold fresh election. The action is bad & illegal.
If the aforesaid resolution was the foundation election Committee, The of then Election October, 2008 giving it conducted being birth to suffers by bad the and was the from Society illegal, existing the in the
Cooperative
Department
perfectly
justified in appointing an Administrator under Section 78 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act,1960.
10.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)