Stephen Hawkings discovery that a black hole can radiate energy due to quantum uncertainty rules and that

the galaxys formed due to the imperfection of the distribution of matter was explained by him as "there is imperfection in everything." "Imperfection drives the universe" was also his statement in a recent film I watched. Entropy is indeed in everything and perfection is not allowed. What if the so-called red-shift of the expansion of the universe could be explained as the frequency of light being downshifted over time by entropy? What if that is the case in even a small part and also still allow for expansion? In my conceptual view of gravity, I have considered the probability that gravity is an entropic force which would eventually reduce all forms of electromagnetic radiation energy. Over a long enough time, only the field mass would be left and that could be what dark matter and energy is about. In the film I recently watched, the point was that if everything was perfectly ordered, there would be no energy flow. Imbalance causes flow and without it the entire universe would be completly static. I am reminded of the ancient symbol of the Yin and Yang where in the dark swirl, there is a dot of white and in the white sworl, there is a spot of dark. Then in all darkness, there is a small bit of light and in all light there must still be allowed some darkness. The idea is 12,000 years or more old. Smart guys those ancients. What is the result of my proposal of entropy acting on photons from all possible directions is that the universe could be younger than the present concept allows for. Further, I propose that entropy may be a variable wherein at the beginning of the universe it was larger than now. This would make it appear that the expansion was accelerating as we look at the fringes of creation. Entropy is a fundamental law of thermodynamics in our universe and only God can escape its rule since only God can be perfect. --Jerry Hi Jerry, > Interesting ideas you have there. May I offer the opposite view and > throw it out for consideration? > It isn't imperfection that drives the universe. It is perfection, the > perfection necessary to maintain > stability of everything, to keep it from all flying apart. Entropy, in > theory, is just the natural winding down > of momentum exchange from a high temperature (activity level) to a lower > one. However, life > itself is the opposite of entropy, being self organizing creating order > of out disorder. > > It may be that matter and energy are special properties of space > itself. "Empty" space may exhibit > mysterious properties such as "dark energy" or "dark matter" but only > can be detected at the galactic > and intergalactic scales. It's another mystery to be worked out. It > doesn't seem likely to me that > where supposed dark matter has been detect in intergalactic space would > be "cold galaxies" where > all stars have stopped shining and gone dark. > > It seems to me that gravity is not an entropic force because something > like a neutron star or black hole > would be the highest form of order. A neutron star should be a single > crystal of solid neutrons or > at least in a trillion years cool off to that state. That is assuming > that we are defining entropy as > always moving from order to disorder and higher temperature to lower > temperature to where, in theory, > there is the "heat death" of the universe. Then everything is at the > same temperature everywhere. > > So I don't buy Hawking's explanation of imperfection driving the > universe. It just doesn't ring true. > I can see how he might come to that conclusion, but it just doesn't sit > right somehow. > > Best regard, > Dave > > On 9/29/2012 8:46 PM, jebayles2001 wrote: >> > > Sept. 29,2012 >> > > Stephen Hawkings discovery that a black hole can radiate energy due to > > quantum uncertainty rules and that the galaxys formed due to the > > imperfection of the distribution of matter was explained by him as > > "there is imperfection in everything." "Imperfection drives the > > universe" was also his statement in a recent film I watched. >> > > Entropy is indeed in everything and perfection is not allowed. >>

> > What if the so-called red-shift of the expansion of the universe could > > be explained as the frequency of light being downshifted over time by > > entropy? What if that is the case in even a small part and also still > > allow for expansion? >> > > In my conceptual view of gravity, I have considered the probability > > that gravity is an entropic force which would eventually reduce all > > forms of electromagnetic radiation energy. Over a long enough time, > > only the field mass would be left and that could be what dark matter > > and energy is about