Usually I hear about expressions, thoughts, moods, feelings and reality, etc.

So me would say most of them reffer to inner matters, to self introspection. In par t, I find this correct but there is one problem, people are usually dominated by their rational side. They preceive expressions, thoughts, moods, feelings and r eality mostly in a rational way. And this, ladies and gentlemen, is the general and materialist idea of reality, a description of the ordinary and observable ev eryday world. Those kind of expressions, thoughts, moods, feelings and ideas of reality can be easily recognized by crowds because all them belong to a predefined idea which most people agree. That means they cannot bring anything new, it's just a reafir mation of what already exists. It's not bad at all, but an 'only rational Art' which lacks of depth. Realism ha s mostly to do with skills and technique that are also important for emotive Art s. For example, a very skilled painter whose talent is the perception of lights and shadows, some of them can make a painting almost like a photography. Which i s great as well, those painters are very very skilled, talented also but their r ational side seems to be still their stronger side. Otherwise, there is an aesthetic or emotive side of Art, which has to do with th e emotive part, dreams, imagination, fantasy, all that one cannot describe preci sly with words, etc. Some consider this a non-important part of their lives, so they cast it off, for most Realists all this fantasy is unreal and unexistent. As we can consider that it's what I do that defines me, and what I do depends of what I want, so what I want depends of my dreams and fantasies. That's the fuel which gives us the force to achieve and fight for what we want, to live with fi erce passion and not just survive. That's what I call THE FORCE, and that force would lead us and our spirit to perceive far beyond the ordinary. The Talent mea ns the hability to find that force in what we do. Coming back to the painter example, it would be like perceiveing far beyond the lights and shadows. It's said that we can only see things by the light they refl ect, and that's what a realist painter perceive, reflections. The emotive side h as to do with figuring out what cause those reflections, one cannot simply see i t, one must achieve a CONTEMPLATION to see far beyond of what's visible, to perc eive the spirit as looking directly through the eyes of Nature. We must to elevate and reach a SEVENTH SENSE which has to do with finding the hi gher expression for what we have perceived, it has to do with understanding for giving it a shape in a ethereal world, for then bring it down to our world as an act of creation. And finally our skills and technique would help us to translat e it into a material piece. So, What's the correct way to translate that divine contemplation? What kind of shot sizes, angles and movements I'm gonna use for m y scene and why? Sometimes the emotive side can achieve death, destruction, hate and even murder as something beautiful, which a rationalist/realist would automatically find it as repulsive. The target of rational art is mostly their exhibition, but emotive art shall be like a manifest of your divine part, it's like a challenge of you with yourself, where you're the only one who can really criticize your own work, let you share your opinion of your work with yourself, you're your hardest judg e.