Professional Documents
Culture Documents
May2012
Introduction
Purpose: Thepurposeofthisguidanceistoassistresourceprofessionals andlandownersinmakinginformeddecisionsaboutseedandplantstobeused onStatefundedrestorationandBMPprojects.Theguidelinesassistwithplant selectionandsourceconsiderationsforseedandplantmaterial(herbaceousand woody)acrossthestateofMinnesota.Goalsoftheguidelinesaretodevelop consistencyamongstateprograms;toavoidtheuseofinvasivespecies;andto ensurethatplantingsfunctionatahighlevel,andmeetprojectgoals.The guidelineswillbeupdatedperiodically,asnewresearchandfieldexperience becomesavailable. Contents: Aslistedbelow,thestructureoftheguidelinesincludeanintroductionsummarizingtheirpurpose, applicabilityanduse;generalconsiderationsforselectingseedandplants;andspecificguidanceforavarietyof projecttypes.Theappendicesincludearecommendedsequenceforfindingplantmaterials,definitionsofterms usedintheguide,andalistofliteraturecited.
Introduction..Page 1 General Considerations....Page 2 Speciesdiversity,Seedandplantsources,Nativevariety/cultivaruse,Seedmixes, Yellowtagseed,Projectbiddingandspecifications,andProtectingnaturalcommunities Guidance by Project Type....Page 8 NativePrairieReconstruction,WetlandRestoration,AgriculturalBMPs,Stormwater Basins,RaingardensandBiofiltrationAreas,Shorelines,Forest/Woodlands, Native/RemnantPlantCommunityRestoration,TemporaryCover Appendix A, Recommended Steps for Obtaining Plant Materials: ..Page 13 Appendix B, Definitions..........Page 14 Appendix C, Literature Cited......Page 15
Applicability: TheseguidelinesapplytoallBWSRprogramsthathavevegetation restorationcomponents,aswellasotherstateprogramsthathaveadoptedtheguidelines. TheseguidelinesreplaceBWSRsInvasiveNonNativeSpeciesPolicy(Sept.8,2004). Afterbecomingfamiliarwiththeguidelines,localresourcestaffwithexpertiseaboutnative seedandplantsshouldbebetterinformedtomakedecisionsaboutappropriatevegetation forprojects.SpecificquestionscanbedirectedtotheBWSRVegetationSpecialist,orothers withsimilarknowledge. Contact Information: DanShaw,BWSRVegetationSpecialist/Landscape
Ecologist,Phone:6512960644,email:dan.shaw@state.mn.us
General Considerations
Species Diversity
Inmostcases,highspeciesdiversityisrecommendedforprojectstoincrease ecologicalfunction.Manystudies(Knopsetal1999,Tilman,1997,1999,Biondini 2007,Piper1996)haveshownbenefitsfromhavinghighdiversity,includingresistance toinvasivespecies,rapidestablishment,improvedplantcommunitystructure, increasedbiomass,decreasedspreadoffungaldiseases,andincreasedrichnessand structureofinsectcommunities. Therearemanyconsiderationswhendeterminingtargetdiversitylevelsforaproject, includingtargetplantcommunities,siteconditions,functionalgoals,andbudget.Asa generalrule,naturalregeneration,includingestablishmentfromtheseedbankshould bemaximizedatrestorationsitestopromotelocalplantestablishment,and contributetodiversitylevels. Therearecertainsituations(particularlyinurbanareas)whereprojectsmaybeplantedinphaseswithlowerdiversity plantedinitiallytoaidweedcontrolandmorediversityaddedinsubsequentyears.Therehavebeenmanyeffortsin Minnesotatoincreasediversitylevelsinexistingprojects.BWSRhasdevelopedinterseedingguidelinestoprovide informationabouttechniquesthatcanbeusedtoincreasediversitylevels(www.bwsr.state.mn.us/native_vegetation). Thefollowingtableprovidesminimumrecommendednativediversitylevelsforarangeofprojectconditionsand functionalgoals.Targetdiversitylevelsforaparticularprojectalsodependonnaturalregenerationpotentialofasite, andthetypeofplantcommunitybeingrestored.Itisimportantthatspeciesabundanceisalsoconsideredalongwith diversity,toensurethatsufficientcoverofindividualspeciesispresenttomeetvegetationgoals.
Recommendedsequencefor obtainingseed/plants:
A)Areaswithsimilarsiteconditionsand locatedasclosetotheprojectsiteas possible(includingseedbankandsite collectedseed) B)EcologicalSubsections C)EcologicalSections D)Workingoutwardfromthesitewith 175milesastherecommended maximumrange.
Seed Mixes
Seedharvestedfromlocalremnantpopulationsisoftenthemostdesirablesource.Ifseedfromremnantpopulations, orplantsgrownfromthelocalseedisnotavailable,oriflocallyharvestedseedneedstobesupplementedwith additionalspecies,stateseedmixeshavebeendevelopedformanyprojecttypesandareavailableatthefollowing website:(www.bwsr.state.mn.us/native_vegetation).Specificmixeshavebeendevelopedforwetlandmitigation, conservationandBMPplantings.Themixescontaincombinationsofearlyandlatersuccessionalspecies,warmandcool seasongrasses,forbs,sedgesandrushestomeettheneedsofspecificprojects/programs.Substitutions/sitespecific changesorsitespecificmixesthatfollowsimilardesigncriteriaareacceptableforprojectsiftheymeettheintended goalsofaproject/programandareapprovedbylocalresourcestaff.Additionalspecies,suchastreeandshrubseedcan alsobeaddedtomixes. AguidetodevelopingsitespecificseedmixeshasalsobeendevelopedforMinnesotaandisavailableat: http://www.lrrb.org/PDF/201020.pdf.Afocusoftheguideisondevelopingmixesthatareappropriateforsite conditionsandincorporatingplantguilds(warmseasongrasses,coolseasongrasses,legumes,asters,etc.)thatare importantforweedcompetitionandecologicalfunction. Summary of State Seed Mixes
Seed Mixes Cover Crop 21111 21112 21113 Mid-term Stabilization Native 32241 Stormwater Facilities 33261 33262 33361 Wetland 34171 34181 34261 34262 34271 34361 34371 Native Grassland 35221 35241 35421 35441 35521 35541 35621 35641 Woodland 36211 36311 36411 36711 Name/Description OatsCoverCrop WinterWheatCoverCrop SoilBuildingCoverCrop NativeConstruction StormwaterSouthandWest DrySwale/Pond StormwaterNortheast WetlandRehabilitation EmergentWetland RiparianSouthandWest WetPrairie WetMeadowSouth&West RiparianNortheast WetMeadowNortheast DryPrairieGeneral MesicPrairieGeneral DryPrairieNortheast MesicPrairieNorthwest DryPrairieSouthwest MesicPrairieSoutheast DryPrairieSoutheast MesicPrairieSoutheast WoodlandEdgeSouth&West WoodlandEdgeNortheast WoodlandEdgeNorthwest WoodlandEdgeCentral Mixes Replaced by New Mixes MNDOT110,BWSRUT1 MNDOT100 MNDOT130 BWSRU12,BWSRU11 MNDOT310,MNDOT328 BWSRW4 BWSRW7 BWSRWT3 BWSRW1 BWSRR1 BWSRW3,MNDOT325 BWSRW2 BWSRR1 BWSRW2N MNDOT330 MNDOT350 BWSSRU2 BWSRU1 BWSRU4 BWSRU6 BWSRU6 BWSRU5 BWSRU7, BWSrU13,BWSrU14
Wetland Restoration
General Considerations - Individualconservationandmitigation programsprovideguidanceforgoalsrelatedtonativevegetationestablishmentin wetlands.Invasivespeciescontrol,particularlyreedcanarygrassisoftena concernforwetlandprojectsandneedsufficientcontroltoallownative vegetationtothrive.Nativeseedbankplaysanimportantroleinthe establishmentofwetlandvegetation.Awidevarietyofwetlandspeciesarealso becomingcommerciallyavailableforseedingwetmeadowsandshallowmarshes. Achieving High Function - Wetlandgrasses,sedges,rushesandforbsall playimportantrolesinprovidinghabitatforawiderangeofwildlifespecies.Some researchhasshownthathigherdiversitylevelscanalsoaidinwaterqualityfunctionssuchasdenitrification.Ensuringsufficient controlofinvasivespecieswillaidnativespeciesestablishmentandensurelongtermsustainabilityofecologicalfunctions. Diversity - Nativeseedbankmaysupplementwetlandrestorationprojects,butseedbanksaressometimesunpredictable,and notallspeciesdowellfromseedbank.Mostwetmeadowseedmixescontainaround2030species.Shallowmarshcommunities maybeseededwithmixesof1020species;itisalsocommontousecontainerizedplantswhenestablishingemergentspecies. Specificconservationandmitigationprogramswilldefinediversitygoals.Inmostcases,wetlandbankingandmitigation programsuseStateseedmixes,whileconservationprogramsusecustomdesignedmixes. Source Recommendations - Mostwetlandspeciescommontoprairiepotholesandriversystemslikelyhadawider dispersalthroughwaterfowlandwaterflowthanmanyprairiespecies.Asaresult,awidersourcedistancemaybeappropriate forsomespecies.CalcareousfensarearareplantcommunitytypeinMinnesota,onlyverylocalsourcesshouldbeusedinand aroundcalcareousfens. Information Sources - MinnesotaWetlandRestorationGuidewww.bwsr.state.mn.us/publications/restoration_guide.html
Agricultural BMPs
General Considerations - ThereareawidevarietyofagriculturalBMPs designedtostabilizesoilsandpromotewaterquality,includinggrasswaterways, filterstripsandvegetatedbuffers.Primarygoalsoftheseprojectsaretostabilize soil,andtofilterandinfiltratestormwater.Insomecases,theymayalsoprovide wildlifecoverandfoodsources. Achieving High Function -Deeprootedprairiegrassareoftenamajor componentofurbanBMPplantings,astheyhavemanystems,standuprightin flowingwater,andtheirrootsystemshelpincreaseorganiccontentinsoil,prevent erosionanddeveloprootchannelsthatincreaseinfiltrationrates. Diversity - AgriculturalBMPssometimeshaverelativelylowdiversitylevels(18)species.Forbsmaynotbeafocusof plantingifherbicidedriftisaconcern.Pollinatorsthatareattractedtoforbsmayalsobenegativelyimpactedwhenoverspray occurs. Source Recommendations -CultivarsandvarietiesofnativespeciesshouldnotbeusediftheagriculturalBMPisnextto
aremnantprairie(within1/4mile).
Stormwater Basins
General Considerations - Stormwaterbasinsareoftenareasofhigh disturbanceduetofluctuatingwaterlevels,pollutantsandsedimentation.Plants areoftenneededthatcanhandletheseconditionssuchasfloodplainforestspecies. Morewatertolerantspeciesarecommonlyplantedinthebaseofdetentionbasins, whiledryprairie,mesicprairieorwoodlandspeciesaretypicallyplantedonside slope.Stormwaterbasinsarepronetoinvasionofweedspecies,soroutineweed controlisoftenneeded. Achieving High Function - Akeytoachievinghighfunctioninstormwater pondsinvolvescreatingsuitableconditionsforspeciesastheyestablish;and plantingspeciesthatcanthriveinthesiteconditionsasplantsthatarehealthywill aidwaterinfiltration,filtering,toxinremediation,andevapotranspiration. Diversity - Mediumdiversitylevelsareoftenusedforstormwaterbasinsideslope(1030species).Acombinationofnative grassesandforbsonsideslopeswillhelpprovidecompetitionfromweedspecies.Lowerdiversityisoftenusedinthebaseof stormwaterbasins,aslessspeciesareadaptedtothehydrologyconditionsassociatedwiththeseareas. Source Recommendations - Stormwaterbasinsaretypicallyconnectedtodownstreamwetlandsandother waterbodies,sospeciesshouldnotbeusedthatmaynegativelyinfluencedownstreamresources.Itisalsoimportantthat invasivespeciesbecontrolledinstormwaterbasinstoavoiddownstreamimpacts. Information Sources - PlantsforStormwaterDesignwww.pca.state.mn.us/publications/manuals/stormwaterplants.html
10
Shorelines
General Considerations - Shorelineprojectsincludelakeshores,pondsand streambanks.Thesearetypicallyareasofhighwildlifeuseandcanplayan importantroleforwaterqualityimprovementandslopestability. Achieving High Function - Avarietyoftreesshrubs,grasses,sedgesand flowerscanbeusedalongshorelinestoprovidewildlifeandwaterquality functions.Shrubsandvariousbioengineeringtechniquesaresometimesusedif thereisafocusonstabilizingsoilsalongsteepbanks. Diversity - Mediumtohighdiversitylevels(2040+species)aretypicallyplanted toprovidehabitatforavarietyofwildlifespeciesrangingfrompollinatorstoamphibians,reptilesandbirdspecies. Source Recommendations -Localsourcesofseedandplantsarerecommendedforshorelineprojects,astheseareas
mayhavedirectconnectionstonaturalplantcommunitieswheregeneticinteractionsmaybeaconsideration.Theseed/plant sourcesequenceoutlinedintheguideisrecommendedforshorelineprojects.
Forest/Woodlands
General Considerations - Thegoalsofforestplantingscanvarygreatly fromnaturalregenerationeffortsfollowingloggingoperationstotheseedingor plantingoftreesandshrubsintoagriculturalfieldstoestablishforeststands. Achieving High Function - Targetspeciesforforest/woodlandprojectswill varydependingontheplantcommunitybeingrestored,andprojectgoalsforwater quality,wildlifeandlumberproduction.Asageneralrule,higherdiversityplantings willincreasewildlifevalue. Diversity - Highdiversitylevelsof10to25speciesarerecommendedfor wildlifehabitatfocusedprojects.Diversitylevelswilloftenbelimitedbythenumberofspeciesavailablethataresuitablefora projectsite.Herbaceousspeciesmayalsobeplantedatthesametimeastreesandshrubsifthesiteistransitioningfroma disturbedconditions(agriculturalfield,etc.).Mixdiversitywilldependonsiteconditionsandprojectgoals.Relativelylow diversitymixesmaybeusediftreesandshrubsareplantedclosetogether,orifwoodlandforbs,fern,andgrassesmayre establishattheprojectsite. Source Recommendations - Manyforestnurseriesdocumenttheseedsourcefortheirtreesandshrubs,thisisuseful informationformakingdecisionsaboutsuitablesourcesandtoensurethattreesandshrubsthatareplantedwillproduceviable seed.Somenurseriescanalsocontractgrowtreesandshrubsfromseedorcuttings.TheMinnesotaDepartmentofNatural ResourcehasdevelopedseedzonesforMinnesotathatarewidelyusedfordeterminingappropriateseedsources: http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/forestry/ecs_silv/fieldpractices/seedcollection.htmlforforestprojects. Information Sources - DNRForestryWebsite:http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/forestry/index.html
11
Temporary Cover
General Considerations Temporarycoversareusedinawidevarietyof situationsrelatedtoconservationplantings.Insomecases,cerealgrainsmaybe plantedtostabilizesitesinpreparationofseedingpermanentseedmixes.In othercases,perennialnativegrassesareplantedinlowdiversitystandsto stabilizeconstructionareastopreparesitesforaddingmorespeciesafterweeds arecontrolled,ortoallowforthecolonizationofnativetreesandshrubs,suchas floodplainforestrestorationswherespeciessuchasswitchgrassorVirginiawild ryeareplantedtostabilizethesite.AnnualspeciessuchAmericanSloughgrass canalsobeusedtostabilizeareastobeestablishedwithshallowanddeepmarsh plantcommunities. Achieving High Function - Thegoaloftemporarystabilizationinvolvespromotingsufficientestablishmentofgrass speciestoholdsoilandpreventsedimentloss.Onceadditionalspeciesareaddedto(orcolonize)asiteadditionalwildlifeand plantcommunityfunctionscanbeattained. Diversity -Temporarycovercropsaretypicallyplantedinlowdiversityplantingsofonetofivespecies,asadditionalspecies willbeadded(orwillcolonize)overtime. Source Recommendations - Thesourcesequenceincludedinthethisguideisrecommendedfortemporarycover plantings,particularlyifperennialspeciesareplantednearnaturalcommunities.Sourceislessofaconcernforshortlivednative speciesthatareusedforstabilizationsuchascerealgrains. Information Sources - MinnesotaWetlandRestorationGuidewww.bwsr.state.mn.us/publications/restoration_guide.html
12
Appendix A
8)Developorselectseedmixesthatareneededfortheproject.Factorsthatwillinfluenceseed mixdevelopmentinclude:availabilityoflocalharvestedseed,nativeseedbankpotential, stateseedmixesandsubstitutiontables,andseedavailabilityfromvendors.Iflocalwild harvestseedwillbeused,pureseedmustbetestedandgermination,hardseedand PureLiveSeedinformationprovidedonseedtagsforallspeciesthatarerequiredthrougha programorprojectdiversitystandard.Supplementwildharvestseedmixesasneededto meetdiversity,orquantityrequirements.Whenpurchasingstandardmixes,investigate availabilityofyellowtagseed(http://www.mncia.org/). 9)Workwithlocalseedandplantvendorstofindseedthatmeetssourcerequirements;theycan oftenworkwithothervendorstoobtainlocalsourcesofseed.Ifbiddingisconducted,includespecificationsforplant materials.Reviseseedmixesorprojectsequencingasneededbasedonavailabilityofseedandplants. 10)Uponinstallation,keepseedtags(showingorigin).
13
Appendix B
Definitions:
AlleleAvariant(oneoftowormoreformsofagene)oftheDNAsequenceatagivenlocus(locationofageneorDNRSequenceon achromosome). CultivarAcultivatedplantthathasbeenselectedandgivenauniquenamebecauseofdesiredcharacteristicsandwhen propagated(usuallyvegetatively)retainsthosecharacteristics. Generation0Seedharvestedfromremnantprairietractsthatwillbeusedtogrownewplants(G1).Generation0seedsare consideredgeneticallyunalteredbyhumanactivityandthecollectionsiteshouldbeinanaturalstate.Generation0seedhasnot beenthroughanintentionalselectionprocessanditsoriginisgenerallydefinablebyageographiclocationfromwhichtheseedis collected. Generation1SeedharvestedfromfieldsreconstructedwithsourceidentifiedGeneration0seed. GeneticcontaminationLossofnativeplantpopulationfitnessduetotheadditionofnonlocalgenesintonativepopulationsvia pollen,seedorplantmaterial. GeneticsensitivityThesensitivityofanindividualspeciestoinbreeding,lossofadaptationoroutbreedingdepression. GenotypeThegeneticmakeupofacellororganism(theallelemakeupofanorganism). GermplasmThehereditarymaterialthatistransmittedfromonegenerationtoanother. HardseedSeedsthatremainhardattheendoftheprescribedtestperiodbecausetheyhavenotabsorbedwaterduetoan impermeableseedcoat. InbreedingThebreedingofrelatedindividualswithinanisolatedorasmallpopulationofplants,sometimesleadingtodecreased geneticdiversityandfitness. LocusThespecificlocationofageneorDNAsequenceonachromosome.AvariantoftheDNAsequenceatagivenlocusiscalledanallele. OutbreedingdepressionWhenoffspringfromcrossesbetweenindividualsfromtwodifferentplantpopulationshavelowerfitness thanprogenyfromcrossesbetweenindividualsfromthesamepopulation. PrairiereconstructionTheestablishmentofprairiespeciesonasitethatcontainsnoactivelygrowingremnantvegetation;suchas anagriculturalfieldorlawn. Pureliveseed(PLS)Themeasurementoftheamountofseedthatgerminatesinastandard(14day)germinationtest,plusthe amountfoundtobealivefromaviability(tz)test.PLSisdeterminedbymultiplyingthepercentgerminationsuccessbythepurityof seed. PureseedSeedexclusiveofinertmatterandallotherseedsnotofthekindofseedbeingconsideredasdefinedbytherulesfor testingseedsoftheAssociationofOfficialSeedAnalysts. RemnantFragmentofaclimaxplantcommunitythatremainsfromaformerperiod,typicallybeforeEuropeansettlement. SelectedtraitsTraitsthatarepromotedintentionallyorinsomecasesunintentionallysuchasheight,flowercolor,form,leafcolor, foragequalityandleafiness. VarietyAtaxonomicsubdivisionofaspeciesconsistingofnaturallyoccurringorselectivelybredpopulations(usuallypropagated byseed)orindividualsthatdifferfromtheremainderofthespeciesincertainminorcharacteristics. WildharvestSeedthatisharvestedfromremnantnativeplantcommunities Yellowtagseed.Sourceidentifiedseedthatiscomprisedoftheleastselectedgermplasmforaspecies.Thelocationwherethe materialwasoriginallycollectedfromnativestands(geneticorigin)isindicatedonthecertificationlabel.
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources An equal opportunity employer
14
Appendix C
Literature Cited:
DiversityReferences Betz,R.F.,Lootens,R.J.,Becker,M.K.1997.TwodecadesofprairierestorationatFermilab,BataviaIllinois,pp.[20]30 inWarwick,Charles,EditorProceedingsFifteenthNorthAmericanPrairieConferenceBend,Oregon. Biondini,M.2007.PlantDiversity,Production,Stability,andSusceptibilitytoInvasioninRestoredNorthernTallGrass Prairies(UnitedStates).RestorationEcology15:7787. Bohnen,J.L.andS.M.Galatowitsch.2005.SpringPeeperMeadow:RevegetationPracticesinaSeasonalWetland RestorationinMinnesota.EcologicalRestoration23:172181. Fargione,J.E.,D.Tilman.2005a.Diversitydecreasesinvasionviabothsamplingandcomplementarityeffects.Ecology Letters8:604611. Fargione,J.,Tilman,D.2005b.Nichedifferencesinphenologyandrootingdepthpromotecoexistencewithadominant C4bunchgrass.Oecologia143:598606. Fargione,J.;Brown,C.S.;Tilman,D.2003.Communityassemblyandinvasion:Anexperimentaltestofneutralversus nicheprocesses.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences100:89168920. Fraser,LHandEBMadson.2008.Theinteractingeffectsofherbivoreexclosuresandseedadditioninawetmeadow. Oikos117:10571063. Galatowitsch,S.M.2008.Seedlingestablishmentinrestoredecosystems.Chapter15:SeedlingEcologyandEvolution.M. LeckandT.Parker(Ed.).CambridgePress. Grace,J.B.,TMAnderson,MDSmith,ESeabloom,SJAndelman,G.Meche,EWeiher,LKAllain,H.Jutila,MSankaran,J. Knopps,MRitchie,andMRWillig.2007.Doesspeciesdiversitylimitproductivityinnaturalgrasslandcommunities? EcologyLetters10:680689. HilleRisLambers,J.;Harpole,W.S.;Tilman,D.;Knops,J.;Reich,P.2004.Mechanismsresponsibleforthepositive diversityproductivityrelationshipinMinnesotagrasslands.EcologyLetters7:661668 Hooper,D.U.,F.S.Chapin,III,J.J.Ewel,A.Hector,P.Inchausti,S.Lavorel,J.H.Lawton,D.M.Lodge,M.Loreau,S. Naeem,B.Schmid,H.Setl,A.J.Symstad,J.Vandermeer,andD.A.Wardle.2005.Effectsofbiodiversityonecosystem processes:implicationsforecosystemmanagement[ESAPublicAffairsOffice,PositionPaper].EcologicalSocietyof America.Jamestown,ND:NorthernPrairieWildlifeResearchCenterOnline. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/habitat/econsens/index.htm(Version24AUG2006). Howell,E.A.,V.Kline.1994.Theroleofcompetitioninthesuccessfulestablishmentofselectedprairiespecies,pp.193 198inWickett,RobertG.,etal.(ed.)/ProceedingsoftheThirteenthNorthAmericanPrairieConference:spiritofthe land,ourprairielegacy:held69August1992,Windsor,Ontario,Canada. Howell,E.A.andW.R.JordanIII.1989.TallgrassprairierestorationinthenorthAmericanMidwest.Pp.395414in Spellerberg,I.F.,F.B.Goldsmith,andM.G.Morris(eds)/Thescientificmanagementoftemperatecommunitiesfor conservation.The31stSymposiumoftheBritishEcologicalSocietySouthampton1989. Howe,H.F.,J.S.Brown,andBZornArnold.2001.Arodentplagueonprairiediversity.EcologyLetters5:3036. Kirt,R.R.2001.Asixteenyearassessmentofvegetationalchangesinprairieseedbroadcastandseedlingtransplant sites,pp.[98]106inBernstein,NeilP.;Ostrander,LauraJ.(ed.)/ProceedingsoftheSeventeenthNorthAmericanPrairie
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources An equal opportunity employer
15
Conference:seedsforthefuture,rootsofthepast:held1620,July,2000,NorthIowaAreaCommunityCollege,Mason City,Iowa. Kline,V.M.1997.OrchardsofOaksandaSeaofGrass,pp.321inPackard,StephenandCorneliaF.Mutel(eds)/The TallgrassRestorationHandbook,ForPrairies,Savannas,andWoodlands.IslandPress,Covelo,CA. Knops,J.M.H.;Tilman,D.;Haddad,N.M.;Naeem,S.;Mitchell,C.E.;Haarstad,J.;Ritchie,M.E.;Howe,K.M.;Reich,P. B.;Siemann,E.;Groth,J.1999.Effectsofplantspeciesrichnessoninvasiondynamics,diseaseoutbreaks,insect abundancesanddiversity.EcologicalLetters2:286293. Jacobson,R.L.,Albrecht,N.J.,Bolin,K.E.1992.Wildflowerroutes:benefitsofamanagementprogramforMinnesota rightofwayprairies,pp.153158inSmith,DarylD.;Jacobs,CarolA.(ed.)/ProceedingsoftheTwelfthNorthAmerican PrairieConference:recapturingavanishingheritage:held59August1990,CedarFalls,Iowa. Martin,L.M.,K.A.Moloney,andB.Wilsey.2005.JournalofAppliedEcology.Anassessmentofgrasslandrestoration successusingspeciesdiversitycomponents.JournalofAppliedEcology42:327336. Martin,L.M.andB.J.Wilsey.2006.Assessinggrasslandrestorationsuccess:relativerolesofseedadditionsandnative ungulateactivities.JournalofAppliedEcology. MinnesotaDepartmentofNaturalResources.2005.FieldGuidetotheNativePlantCommunitiesofMinnesota:The EasternBroadleafProvince.St.PaulMN:EcologicalLandClassificationProgram,MinnesotaCountyBiologicalSurvey, andNaturalHeritageandNongameResearchProgram,MNDNR. Naeem,S.;Knops,J.M.H.;Tilman,D.;Howe,K.M.;Kennedy,T.;Gale,S.2000.Plantdiversityincreasesresistanceto invasionintheabsenceofcovaryingextrinsicfactors.Oikos91:97108. Packard,S.1994.Successionalrestoration:thinkinglikeaprairie.Restoration&ManagementNotes12(l):3239. Perry,L.G.,S.M.Galatowitsch,C.J.Rosen.2004.Competitivecontrolofinvasivevegetation:anativewetlandsedge suppressesPhalarisarundinaceaincarbonenrichedsoil.JournalofAppliedEcology41:151162. Piper,J.K.1996.Compositionofprairieplantcommunitiesonproductiveversusunproductivesitesinwetanddryyears. Can.J.Bot.73:16351644. Piper,J.K.,E.S.Schmidt,A.J.Janzen.2007.EffectsofSpeciesRichnessonResidentandTargetSpeciesComponentsina PrairieRestoration.RestorationEcology15:189198. Piper,J.K.,Pimm,S.L.2002.Thecreationofdiverseprairielikecommunities.CommunityEcology3:205216. Schramm,Peter.1978.The"do'sanddon'ts"ofprairierestoration,pp.139150inGlennLewin,DavidC.;Landers, RogerQ.,Jr.(ed.)/FifthMidwestPrairieConferenceproceedings:IowaStateUniversity,Ames,August2224,1976. Smith,MD,JCWilcox,T.Kelly,,andAKKnapp.2004.Dominancenotrichnessdeterminesinvasibilityoftallgrassprairie. Oikos106:253262. Symstad,A.2000.Atestoftheeffectsoffunctionalgrouprichnessandcompositionongrasslandinvasibility.Ecology 81:99109. Symstad,A.J.;Tilman,D.;Willson,J.;Knops,J.M.H.1998.Specieslossandecosystemfunctioning:effectsofspecies identityandcommunitycomposition.Oikos81:389397.
16
Tilman,D.2001.Functionaldiversity.Pages109120,in,S.A.Levin,EditorinChief,EncyclopediaofBiodiversity,Vol.3. AcademicPress,SanDiego,CA. Tilman,D.2000.Causes,consequencesandethicsofbiodiversity.Nature405:208211. Tilman,D.1999.Theecologicalconsequencesofchangesinbiodiversity:asearchforgeneralprinciples.TheRobertH. MacArthurAwardLecture.Ecology80:14551474. Tilman,D.1997.Communityinvasibility,recruitmentlimitation,andgrasslandbiodiversity.Ecology78:8192. Tilman,D.1996.Biodiversity:Populationversusecosystemstability.Ecology77(3):350363. TilmanD.,P.B.Reich,J.M.H.Knops.2006.Biodiversityandecosystemstabilityinadecadelonggrasslandexperiment. Nature:441:629632. Tilman,D.,J.Knops,D.Wedin,P.Reich,M.Ritchie,E.Siemann.1997.Theinfluenceoffunctionaldiversityand compositiononecosystemprocesses.Science277:13001302. Tilman,D.,J.A.Downing.1994.Biodiversityandstabilityingrasslands.Nature367:363365. U.S.DepartmentofTransportation,FederalHighwayAdministration.PublicationNo.FHWAEP03005HEPN30:The NatureofRoadsides.WashingtonD.C. Wedin,D.A.,D.Tilman.1996.Influenceofnitrogenloadingandspeciescompositiononthecarbonbalanceof grasslands.Science274:17201723. Wedin,D.A.,D.Tilman.1992.Nitrogencycling,plantcompetitionandthestabilityoftallgrassprairie.Pages58inD.D. SmithandC.A.Jacobs,Eds.,ProceedingsoftheTwelfthNorthAmericanPrairieConference.UniversityofNorthernIowa Press,CedarFalls,IA. Wilsey,B.J.andH.W.Polley.2004.Realisticallylowspeciesevennessdoesnotaltergrasslandspeciesrichness productivityrelationships.Ecology85:26932700. GeneticsReferences Broadhurst,L.M.;Lowe,A.;Coates,D.J.;Cunningham,S.A.;McDonald,M.;Vesk,P.A.;Yates,C.2008.Seedsupplyfor broadscalerestoration:maximizingevolutionarypotential.EvolutionaryApplications,Volume1Issue4:587597. Burton,P.J.;Burton,C.M.2002.PromotingGeneticDiversityintheProductionofLargeQuantitiesofNativePlantSeed. EcologicalRestoration,Vol.20,No.2:117123. Casler,MD,CAStendal,L.Kapich,andKPVogel.2007.Geneticdiversity,plantadaptationregions,andgenepoolsfor switchgrass.CropScience47:22612273 Edmonds,S.,andC.C.Timmerman.2003.Modelingfactorsaffectingtheseverityofoutbreedingdepression. ConservationBiology17:883892. Erickson,B.;NavarretteTindall,N.E.2004.MissouriNativeEcotypeProgram:IncreasingLocalSourceNativeSeed. NaturalAreasJournal.24,1:1522. Falk,D.A.;Knapp,E.E.;Guerrant,E.O.2001.Anintroductiontorestorationgenetics.SocietyforEcologicalRestoration.
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources An equal opportunity employer
17
Gustafson,D.J.,D.J.Gibson,D.L.Nickrent.2004.CompetitiverelationshipsofAndropogongerardii(BigBluestem)from remnantandrestorednativepopulationsandselectcultivatedvarieties.FunctionalEcology:18:451457. Gustafson,D.J.;Gibson,D.J.;Nickrent,D.L.2005.UsingLocalSeedsinPrairieRestoration,DataSupporttheParadigm. NativePlants,Spring2005:2528. Heiser,D.,Shaw,R.TheFitnessEffectsofOutcrossinginCalylophusSerrulatus,ApermanentTranslocation Heterozygote,Evolution,60(1),2006,pp.6476. Huff,D.R.,A.J.Palazzo,M.vanderGrinten.2006.RelationshipsBetweenGeographicDistanceandGenetic Differentiation:Or,WhyDontYouWriteHomeMoreOften?P.161inM.A.Sandersonetal(eds).Proceedingsofthe FifthEasternNativeGrassSymposium,Harrisburg,PA,October1013,2006. Hufford,K.M.,andS.J.Mazer.2003.Plantecotypes:geneticdifferentiationintheageofecologicalrestoration.Trendsin EcologyandEvolution18:147155. Johnson,G.R.;Sorensen,F.C.;StClair,J.B.;Croon,R.C.2004.PacificNorthwestForestTreeSeedZones:ATemplatefor NativePlants?NativePlantsJournal.5,2:131140. Jones,T.2005.GeneticPrinciplesandtheUseofNativeSeedsJusttheFAQs,please,justtheFAQs.NativePlants, Spring2005:1424. Jurgenson,J.;Devries,R.2004.AnalysisofGeneticDiversityofIowasNativePlantSpeciesusingtheBeckmanCEQ8000 GeneticAnalyzer.IowaDOTproject9000LRTF409. Keller,M.,J.Kollmann,andP.J.Edwards2000.Geneticintrogressionfromdistantprovenancesreducesfitnessinlocal weedpopulations,JournalofAppliedEcology37:647659. Lesica,P.;Allendorf,F.W.1999.EcologicalGeneticsandtheRestorationofPlantCommunities:MixorMatch? RestorationEcologyVol.7No.1:4250. MartinezReyna,JMandKPVogel.2008.Heterosisinswitchgrass:spacedplants.CropScience48:13121320. McCully,W.G.2000.UtilizingTheEcotypeConcept:AnInsightintoNativePlantEstablishment,inHarperLoreB.L,M. Wilson,(Eds).RoadsideUseofNativePlants.IslandPress,Covelo,CA.Accessedfrom http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/rdsduse/. McKay,J.K.;Christian,C.E.;Harrison,S.;Rice,K.J.2005.HowLocalisLocal?AReviewofPracticalandConceptual IssuesintheGeneticsofRestoration.RestorationEcology,Vol.13,No.3432440. Millar,C.I.;Libby,W.J.1989.DisneylandorNativeEcosystem:GeneticsandtheRestorationist.Restoration& ManagementNotes7:1,1824. Moncada,K.,Ehlke,N.,Muehlbauer,G.,Sheaffer,C.,andD.Wyse.2005.AssessmentofAFLPbasedGeneticVariation inThreeNativePlantSpeciesAcrosstheStateofMinnesota.MinnesotaDepartmentofTransportationResearch ServicesSection,St.Paul,MN. Rogers,D.,Montalvo,A.GeneticallyAppropriateChoicesforPlantMaterialstoMaintainBiologicalDiversity,USDA ForestService,December31,2004. Sambatti,J.B.M.;Rice,K.J.2006.LocalAdaptation,PatternsofSelection,andGeneFlowintheCalifornianSerpentine Sunflower(Helianthusexilis).Evolution,60(4):696710.
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources An equal opportunity employer
18
St.Clair,B.,R.Johnson.2004.StructureofGeneticVariationandImplicationsfortheManagementofSeedandPlanting Stock.USDAForestServiceProceedingsRMRSP33.2004. Smith,S.E.;Halbrook,K.2004.APlantGeneticsPrimer,BasicTerminology.NativePlants,Fall2004:105111. Smith,D.;Houseal,G.RegionalVariationsinNativeTallgrassPrairieSpecies.IowaDOTproject9000LRTF820. Tallmon,D,Luikart,G.,Waples,R.TheAlluringSimplicityandComplexRealityofGeneticRescure,TrendsinEcologyand Evolution,Vol.19,No.9,Sept.2004 Tober,D.;Duckwitz,W.;Jensen,N.;Knudson,M.2008.FiveReasonstoChooseNativeGrassReleases.USDANatural ResourcesConservationService,PlantMaterialsCenter,Bismarck,NorthDakota. Williams,D.W.;Houseal,G.A.;Smith,D.D.2004.GrowthandReproductionofLocalEcotypeandCultivatedVarietiesof PanicumvirgatumandCoreopsispalmataGrowninCommonGardens.ProceedingsoftheNorthAmericanPrairie Conference,No.19:5560.
19