SUPPOSE THE DATA IS AS FOLLOWS

DAYS
DAY
AMOUNT SPENT
42
1
MON
37
2
TUE
77
3
WED
67
4
THU
92
5
FRI
52
6
SAT
92
7
SUN
82
8
MON
47
9
TUE
47
10
WED
50
11
THU
35
12
FRI
95
13
SAT
65
14
SUN
110
15
MON
70
16
TUE
95
17
WED
85
18
THU
60
19
FRI
60
20
SAT
42
21
SUN
37
22
MON
77
23
TUE
67
24
WED
92
25
THU
26

7 DAY MOVING AVERAGE

65.57
71.29
72.71
68.43
66.00
57.86
64.00
60.14
64.14
67.43
74.29
79.29
82.86
77.86
74.57
64.14
65.14
61.14
62.14

FORECAST FOR 26 THE DAY

NULL HYPOTHESIS :-

THE QULALITY OF FOOD SERVED IS SAME

ALTERNATE HYPOTHESIS :-

THE QULALITY OF FOOD SERVED IS DIFFERENT

Chicken
Platter
6

Chicken
Spinach
7

Tandoori
Chicken
6

Honey Chicken

Anova: Single Factor

SUMMARY
Groups
Chicken Platter
Honey Chicken
Chicken Spinach
Tandoori Chicken

Count
7
7
7
7

ANOVA
Source of Variation
Between Groups
Within Groups

SS
14.10714286
20.85714286

Total

34.96428571

NULL REJECTED :- WHICH MEANS THAT THE QUALITY OF FOOD SERVED IS DIFFERENT.

Sum
50
57
44
46

df

Average
7.142857
8.142857
6.285714
6.571429

Variance
1.809524
0.47619
0.571429
0.619048

MS
F
P-value
F crit
3 4.702381 5.410959 0.005478 3.008787
24 0.869048
27

QS3

NULL HYPOTHESIS :-

THE SALES OF CHOCLATE IS 984.7

ALTERNATE HYPOTHESIS :-

THE SALES OF CHOCLATE HAS DECREASED FROM 984.7

Data
Null Hypothesis
m=
Level of Significance
Population Standard Deviation
Sample Size
Sample Mean

984.7
0.02
72.6
30
912.1

Intermediate Calculations
Standard Error of the Mean
13.25488589
Z Test Statistic
-5.477225575
Lower-Tail Test
Lower Critical Value
-2.053748911
p -Value
2.16023E-08
Do not reject the null hypothesis

NULL ACCEPTED :- WHICH MEANS THAT THE SALES OF CHOCHOLATE IS STILL 984.7

chi square test

Observed Frequencies
Column variable
Gender

Calculations

Baseball

Basketball

Football

Men

19

15

24

Women

16

18

16

Total

35

33

58
50
108

40

Expected Frequencies
Column variable
Gender
Baseball Basketball Football
Men 18.7963 17.72222 21.48148
Women 16.2037 15.27778 18.51852
Total
35
33
40
Data
Level of Significance
Number of Rows
Number of Columns
Degrees of Freedom

Total

Total
58
50
108

fo-fe
0.203704 -2.72222
-0.2037 2.722222

(fo-fe)^2/fe
0.002208 0.418147
0.002561 0.485051

0.05
2
3
2

Results
Critical Value
5.991465
Chi-Square Test Statistic
1.545759
p -Value
0.461682
Do not reject the null hypothesis
Expected frequency assumption
is met.

NULL HYPOTHESIS :-

THERE IS NO ASSOCIATION BETWEEN GEN

ALTERNATE HYPOTHESIS :-

THERE IS AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN GEND

NULL ACEEPTED :- WHICH MEANS THAT THERE IS NO ASSOCAITION BETW

fo-fe
2.518519
-2.51852

(fo-fe)^2/fe
0.295275
0.342519

OCIATION BETWEEN GENDER AND TYPE OF SPORTS

OCIATION BETWEEN GENDER AND TYPE OF SPORTS

S NO ASSOCAITION BETWEEN GENDER AND TYPE OF SPORTS OR SPORT WEAR IS NOT GENDER SPECIFIC

Debt/Capital ( %)

Return on Capital ( %)

Abbott Laboratories

11

31

Allergan

24

25

Cardinal Health

30

14

Johnson & Johnson

11

25

Eli Lilly

31

40

Merck

15

33

Pfizer

23

SmithKline Beecham

10

22

Bristol-Myers Squibb

12

45

Stryker

55

14

Company

United Health
Universal Health

10

17

38.6

9.8

SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R
R Square
Adjusted R Square
Standard Error
Observations
ANOVA
Regression
Residual
Total

Intercept
Debt/Capital ( %)

RESIDUAL OUTPUT
Observation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Regression Statistics
0.416020456
0.17307302
0.090380321
10.26774438
12

df

SS
MS
F
Significance F
1 220.6543 220.6543 2.092966
0.1785862
10 1054.266 105.4266
11 1274.92

Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat
P-value
31.31958665 5.336275 5.869185 0.000157
-0.302572819 0.209146 -1.44671 0.178586

Predicted Return on Capital ( %)

Residuals
27.99128564 3.008714
24.05783899 0.942161
22.24240207
-8.2424
27.99128564 -2.99129
21.93982925 18.06017
26.78099436 6.219006
29.20157691 -6.20158
28.29385845 -6.29386
27.68871282 17.31129
14.6780816 -0.67808
28.29385845 -11.2939
19.64027583 -9.84028

Lower 95% Upper 95%Lower 95.0%

Upper 95.0%
19.42962534 43.20955 19.42963 43.20955
-0.768578337 0.163433 -0.76858 0.163433

Upper 95.0%

Return on Capital ( %)

Debt/Capital ( %) Line Fit Plot

60
40

Return on Capital ( %)

20
0
0

20

40

Debt/Capital ( %)

60

Predicted Return on
Capital ( %)