Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2.Legal Function
The legal function of corporate social responsibility is to encourage transparency in a company's business practices and financial reporting. Maintaining high levels of legal business practices, such as adhering to Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA, regulations promotes goodwill toward employees. Maintaining high levels of legal financial practices maintains good will among investors, stakeholders and government financial-reporting regulatory agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.
3. Societal Function
The societal function of corporate social responsibility is to respect and invest in the communities in which the company operates. Companies are aware of how the production of their products affects the local community. These companies take necessary actions to diminish the negative impacts of factors such as increased traffic, noise and pollution for the communities in which they operate. The societal function of corporate social responsibility also includes companies reinvesting in the communities in which they operate, such as donating money to local charities.
4. Ecological Function
The ecological function of corporate social responsibility is to not only respect the immediate environment in which the company operates but also to respect the company's effect on the global environment. Companies are aware of the environmental impact the production of their products have on their local communities. In corporate social responsibility, these companies adhere to strict standards in an effort to diminish the negative impact of the environmental
byproducts such as air and water pollution from the production of their products. Having such standards impacts both the local and global environments.
3. Financial Responsibility
Financial responsibility is an important issue in corporate social responsibility. In the wake of the accounting fraud perpetrated by Enron and Arthur Andersen and Ponzi schemes orchestrated by the likes of Bernie Madoff, businesses are questioned about the accuracy of their financial reporting by increasingly skeptical shareholders and government officials, as evidenced by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Employees are expected to act as whistle blowers in such situations, and white collar crime is seeing high-profile prosecutions like that of Martha Stewart or former Worldcom CEO Bernie Ebbers.
4. Political Responsibility
Trading with repressive regimes is a difficult issue in corporate social responsibility. Some businesses argue that working with these regimes will help to advance them and bring rights to the countries. People and governments have demanded that businesses stop trading with repressive regimes, which was most notably observed when several western governments launched an embargo against the Apartheid government in South Africa during the 1980s. Shell Oil received considerable consumer backlash during the 1990s for its complicit involvement with the Nigerian government that murdered anti-oil activists. These issues make doing business with certain governments an important consideration for corporate social responsibility.
Brand Enhancement
When CSR is embedded in an organization's business processes, it becomes part of a longer-term plan that drives competitiveness. For instance, a business that has moved its manufacturing plant to a poor country in order to produce goods cost-efficiently, has to make sure it does not exploit weaker labor laws in the developing world. A consumer in the United States does not want to hear that the suit he is wearing was manufactured by an exploited worker in Vietnam, China or Peru. Rather, a consumer would be happy to know that some of the money he spends on his clothes builds schools and hospitals in poor communities. The brand, its reputation and image cannot be separated.
Con 1: Expenses
The main reason any company would object to participating in CSR is the associated costs. With CSR, you pay for environmental programs, more employee training and efficient waste management programs. Proponents of CSR agree that any expenses to businesses are ultimately covered by stronger relationships with key customers. However, David Vogel indicates in his Forbes article "CSR Doesn't Pay" that investment in CSR programs may not necessary result in measurable financial results.
like the value of CSR in attracting socially conscious consumers, finding socially conscious employees and managing the risks of negative press.